GLORIFIED WRONGDOERS

Tae bow to coin

And those who make it

Ensure our groups

Are cruel and sleekit

M. Campbell

Disclaimer

The information contained herein should NOT be used by anyone suffering from the ignorance of differing worth. Should any such folk continue, they do so at their own risk. To counter any negative effects from the contents of this book, there is an abundance of advice, lies, and utter nonsense available from your appropriately qualified local status seekers, who can ensure any ignorance of differing worth is restored. This is not a self-help or a how-to-get-rich book. There is an abundance of books that cater to exploiting the depression and the greed of those mired within their master’s spectrum of productive slaves. This is not one of them. The information provided here is for information purposes only, just as the paper provided here is for paper purposes only. The reader is responsible for any thoughts, acts, or actions they may or may not engage in during or after digesting the contents of this book. Seasonings are available.

Copyright © 2025 M. Campbell.

glorifiedwrongdoers.com

All rights reserved.

A Wee Bit About This Book.

What’s it all about? Well, as far as this book is concerned, it is about us and how we behave and interact within groups. We shall delve into the world of our large-scale human groups, with the most common type being the social hierarchies that most of us have come to know far more intimately than we may prefer, while much will still apply to the subgroups and other hierarchies within them. We will examine how we are treated by them, how we treat each other within them, how we navigate through them, how we change when within them and how we change them. We will be exploring the reasons for our group behaviours and some of the most common ignorances that infects many of us who are part of such groups. Most of which are a consequence of our status seekers’ desperate attempts to convince as many as they can to value the ignorance of differing worth.

We shall crack the superficial veneer of morality and justice that is used by all of our social hierarchies to expose the ugly side of who we are. There is nothing uglier in human nature than what we do to each other when we have obtained the ignorance of differing worth, to convince ourselves that we are righteous when harming those we perceive as less than we are. We would struggle to create a more efficient social structure that could stifle our progress and potential, as well as elevate our cycles of mass wrongdoing as something to be revered, than our cultures of social hierarchies. So we will explore alternatives that can’t be any worse.

We will look at our true history within our empires of lies, and delve into the mass transition from our traditional slave cultures to our modern debt slave cultures, as no social hierarchy or their empires can exist without their slaves. We examine why a degree of elevated worth will always motivate many to champion slavery and call it freedom, glorify wrongdoing and call it justice, endlessly lie and call it truth, destroy people’s homes and work, and call it progress, as well as rape and murder people at will and call it civilization.

Arguably, the vast majority of people know their particular social hierarchy lies to them constantly, as they must in order to maintain their thin veils of superiority that they use to cover up the truth. So we will explore the reasons why so many of us accept and even value being slaves to the interests of a few, and how our social hierarchies maintain their control and dominance over so many by striving to monopolise everything they can, while glorifying their every wrong and vilifying every right that threatens their elevated worth.

We will explore the theme park of mass wrongdoing that is created by our cultures that pander to the ideology of differing worth. Where lies are truth and truth are lies, where malice is strength and compassion is weakness, where wrongs are right and rights are wrong, where fear is bonding and understanding divisive, where cowards are brave and the brave are cowards, where ignorance is revered and knowledge condemned, where crimes are just and justice is a crime, where change is promised and the promised is changed, where criminals are heroes and heroes are criminals, where blind obedience is order and critical thinking is anarchy, where terrorists are honourable and the honourable are terrorists, and where idiots are experts and experts are idiots.

So without further ado, let us climb aboard our endless merry-go-round of lies, inequality and injustice that is championed by our narrators of nonsense, who promote the art of human exploitation as a great moral virtue. Strap ourselves in and get dizzy on the mythical and magical world of our genocidal self-glorifying wrongdoers, their cheerleaders and their victims that make up our social hierarchal groups and our cults of differing worth.

Chapter 1

The Individuals Within

One individual may appear to differ greatly from another when we only know a limited amount about any individual. This is especially true within cultures of differing worth. But the more we know of anyone, and the more we know of ourselves, the more we can understand and even pinpoint the causes of any differences we have with others. In doing so, we recognise ourselves in everyone else.

To understand our groups and our social hierarchies (or anything for that matter), we must understand their individual components. In this case, us. By breaking down our common basic psychological motivations, we can expose our behaviours and similarities. Understanding our psychology is essential in knowing ourselves and those around us.

The beauty of understanding our psychology (like anything else) is when we have everything we need to piece it all together, everything always fits perfectly, like doing a jigsaw puzzle. Understanding ourselves helps us in explaining the mental processes and behaviours that we all engage in and can observe in all those around us. Should we choose to do so.

Now, despite what many may have us believe, all of us are (for all intents and purposes) the same. Our differences are dwarfed by our similarities, and only magnified by our ignorances. If we think of every trait we have as a spectrum, with some of us at one end and some at the other, and more in between, we all stumble along the many spectrums that make us what we are.

Our environments, experiences and interpretations of our environments and experiences determine where our base zones become home on these spectrums. This gives us our individual psychological sequencing. Study anyone close enough, and we will understand the reasons why they are where they are on the various spectrums of life. We can, of course, polarize those at different ends of different spectrums, but these differences are slight when zooming out to look at the whole of our spectrums within spectrums.

Today, many put much of what and who we are, or become, down to nature and nurture, or our genes and environments. But if our genes and our environments make us what and who we are, then all that we are is the result of our environments, as even our genes are altered by and at the mercy of our environments. We owe the very existence of our genes and ourselves to our environments and the other life forms we share them with. Our environments don’t owe their existence to our genes, although many life forms (and therefore genes) can contribute greatly to elements of our environments.

As the rampant ignorances of social hierarchies can’t help conjuring up almost infinite excuses to justify their wrongs, we get the creation of ignorances like eugenics being used in order to justify their narratives and glorify their ignorances. This is the level of understanding we can expect from groups mired in the ignorance of differing worth. This siding towards genetics over environments to explain many of the problems that come with societies governed by wrongdoing allows hierarchies to avoid their major role in these problems. It is always in the interests of glorified wrongdoers to blame anything or anyone but themselves for the consequences of their actions.

So genetics is just the latest fashion in diverting their responsibility for the effects their actions cause. With the usual degree of utter nonsense that spews from those of us desperate to be seen as more than others, genes have been blamed for anything from poverty and crime to intelligence and drive.

These ignorances are usually based on social status and heavily ignore environmental forces. For example, the idea that poverty or crime is largely a creation of social hierarchies would never enter the minds of many submerged within a group that glorifies wrongdoing. These cultures of greed have always used the method of demonizing and criminalising those deemed to be of low social status as a way of elevating their own wrongdoing to a moral deed.

Even today, many within these cultures that value social status believe their genes are special in some way, despite having much less genetic diversity compared with non-status-seeking groups. Genes are for some, just the modern-day gods used to convince many to bow to those who claim to know them. No matter who we think we are, we are all slaves to what we are (some more than others).

Think of our genes as a recipe for a dish and our environments as the ingredients. A recipe can sit idle for years, and without the ingredients, there is no dish. And every dish is only as good as its ingredients. Our chemical, biological, physical, psychological, social and family environments, and more, all play a part in how we end up becoming who we are and the groups we create. If we fail to understand our many environments, then we fail to understand ourselves and others, as we are moulded by the environments we endure. Ignoring our environments to champion our social hierarchies’ many ignorances may be common, but we are our environments.

Casting the Mould

Our earliest environment (on an individual level rather than as a species) begins with the environments of our parents’ reproductive organs. Some will have healthier environments than others, and can play a role in who we become. Then there is the environment we spend the first nine months of our lives in. There can be vital differences between the environments of one mother’s body and another’s. Not to mention the nutritional environment or the different stimuli we get from the environment outside the mother’s body.

Once we are unleashed into the world, our environments for the vital first three years of life that mould us can vary hugely. Now, within all of these environments up until this point, we have not developed our long-term memory yet. So perhaps it is no surprise that these environments are the least explored in explaining why we become who we become, as we can’t consciously recall what we experienced. Although we can have fragmented subconscious recall (but that’s a different book). At birth, our brains are a quarter of the size they will become, and will grow more in our first year than at any other time in our life.

By the time we are three, our brain is around 80-85% the size of our adult brain and our brain development continues until at least around the age of 25-30 (but arguably longer). Our environments and experiences create our neural networks by strengthening the neural connections that get used the most, and pruning those we don’t use.

We could argue that the who and what we become are largely made from these early environments. To overly simplify it, a happy and safe environment can strengthen our joyful neural network and prune our sad/fearful network, and vice versa. So at this point, our environments have already made us more susceptible to being miserable or joyful, fearful or fearless, anxious or calm…etc. As many parents know, what we call our personalities are largely developed by the age of three.

Once we reach around three years old, we develop our long-term memory that ignites the birth of long-term conscious recall. This enables us to take our experiences with us throughout our lives and use them to navigate our environments. Obviously, there are many experiences we will all share and many we won’t, but even our shared experiences can differ greatly in how each individual interprets the experience. The environments we find ourselves in over the next four years of life can play a huge role in how we are going to behave and interact with others for the rest of our lives.

By around the age of seven, we have all but established our own mindset through all of our experiences and environments. Therefore, it is this mindset that we shall more or less take with us for the rest of our lives. Of course, we can tweak and alter some of our behaviours and traits with later experiences, as well as acquire knowledge and ignorances to increase or decrease our understanding of ourselves and our environments. Whether those changes are superficial or genuine, we all adapt to our social environments to some degree.

We can look around and see others as so much different from ourselves, should we choose to, but when we have the knowledge to understand those differences and how they come about, then we can use this understanding to see ourselves in everyone.

Emotions and Consciousness

We all have our emotions, instincts and intuition to help guide us, yet we can often ignore these ancient tools that are so effective. Our emotions that reside in the older part of our brains are our ancient motivators that help us survive. We can learn so much from emotions, but we can also suffer from them by not absorbing the lessons they teach.

If we wallow in them rather than understanding their cause and how they benefit us, then they can harm us more than help us. Our ability to use reason and logic can help us override our emotions in order to gain a more accurate understanding of them. This deeper thinking part of us can be found in the newer parts of our brains. So we could argue that we felt long before we thought. A trait we all still share on occasion (some more than others).

Many believe emotions are what make humans more than other animals, but this stems from the more-than/less-than ignorances many of us are so fond of. However, we can recognise humans have some level of cognitive abilities that not all animals share, and this combined with our tool-making, can set us apart in that regard. But such self-congratulatory thinking can play down the wonder of biology and the variety of survival strategies it creates.

Without studying every animal, we could conclude that all animals with a limbic system have emotion. It makes sense for other animals to have this basic guidance system, after all, we are all animals (some more than others). Just as our ignorances magnify the differences between one human being and another, they can also magnify the differences between humans and other animals, while ignoring our similarities.

Where there is life, there is consciousness. But too many of us believe humans are at the top of the league in the realms of consciousness (surprise, surprise), as we have a habit of elevating ourselves a bit too much. Imagine one species believing they are so special that they dismiss all others as inferior based on their own abilities within their environment. Or we can save our imagination and enter a social hierarchal education system. OK, we shall try to limit the needless attempts at humour. All life is related, so when we belittle other life forms, we are, in effect, belittling ourselves. Just ask the fungi.

Think of consciousness as a spectrum. We can all experience more than one particular element of that spectrum. Or perhaps more accurately, in terms of energy, vibrations and frequencies, where we have several forms of consciousness that tap into the various energies, vibrations and frequencies that are all around us. Most of us are aware of our main consciousness, as well as our subconscious to some degree and even our unconscious elements, but the other states of consciousness within us can go unexplored and unappreciated. So it is no surprise that many fail to recognise the different elements of consciousness in other life forms, when we often fail to recognise our own.

Let’s take our unconscious state as an example. Now we can claim that we have little awareness within this state, but that is only if we define awareness by the narrow spectrum of our own particular definitions of awareness, or in comparison to the form of our main consciousness. Our unconscious regulates our body temperature, immune system, breathing, shivering and even aids our learning and understanding, to name but a few of the things we do in this state. Remember we are doing all of these things because we (or at least our brains) are at some level conscious that they need to be done, even if we are somewhat disconnected from that consciousness.

Take, for example, the conscious effort our brains have to make when learning a task like say driving, compared to the subconscious effort our brain makes when driving a journey we have done countless times before. We can go from fully conscious to totally subconscious with many of the tasks we do, if we do them often enough. Many things our subconscious achieves today would have taken up more of our conscious mind in our past, and once our subconscious has mastered a task, our unconscious can even take it over to free up both our conscious and subconscious mind.

Our conscious mind loves new experiences and hates familiarity. If we define all consciousness by the limited conscious states that our own minds experience, then we are guilty of defining the whole by its parts. So who is to say our niche on the spectrum of consciousness is any more or any less than that of many other life forms, when even a single-celled life is conscious of its environment and adapts accordingly, and remember we all started as a single cell. When it comes to consciousness, as with all things, understanding our environments is everything.

We are arguably in a constant state of multi-consciousness, but a common and fascinating state of consciousness we may undervalue is the multi-conscious state of mind we occupy when we somewhat waken from sleep. When we are no longer asleep, but not yet awake, we are caught between at least two realms of consciousness. Within this state of multi-consciousness between awake and asleep, our minds are largely free from much of what the conscious mind is burdened with during everyday life. Like what we should, could, or need to do, and where we should, could, or need to be, not to mention all the other drivel we must clutter our minds with in order to navigate through a single day within our cultures of nonsense. Yet we are still able to access our main form at the same time as using our other forms of consciousness.

Within this realm of consciousness, we can actually use our minds more effectively than when awake. With the knowledge and information we have accumulated over our lives, and by being more open to the different interpretations this state provides, we can access our brains more effectively. This state of mind can be great at problem solving when we have acquired enough knowledge to solve a problem, but struggle to put all the pieces together when we are within the noise of our main conscious state of mind alone.

Within a similar state of consciousness, let’s call it the empty mind, we can lose awareness of who and what we are, and even the time and place in which we exist. Like in the briefest of moments when waking and finding ourselves using a different part of our consciousness that is not tied to the outward realities of our existence. Within this time, we are free to explore untethered to the self, before our memory drags us back into the realm of our main consciousness. As we are all capable of altered perceptions of time, we can elongate such moments to explore and escape our conditioning, or ignore those fleeting moments to get back to the familiarity of our main consciousness.

Then there is, for want of a better term, the creative states of consciousness, or perhaps the atmospheric state of consciousness may be a more accurate term. But whatever term we wish to call it, this is where we can tune into any of the different energies, vibrations and frequencies that are all around us. A bit like adjusting a radio to change from one channel to another, we can adjust our consciousness to change to and from different frequencies.

Synaesthesia is one of the closest understandings we have to this ability, which can allow us to create and manipulate our creations at will within our minds while still awake. This appears to be more common in the developing mind of our childhood, so perhaps it dies off in adulthood because it is not something that is developed, encouraged or even acknowledged by most. The use-it-or-lose-it reasoning may explain its loss to many in adulthood. Examples of this state would be the ability to create colourful light shows that dance to music, or complex geometric shapes with an abundance of colours that can all be manipulated at will.

These can also merge with our physical states of consciousness, like the ability to expand our consciousness beyond our own skulls, or like the common out-of-body experience many have when near death and revived from it. For many who have not experienced or embraced these states of consciousness, it can all sound rather ridiculous. But a close common experience to some of these states could be compared to what many call the effects of psychedelic plants or drugs.

Now we could argue that it is not the plant or drug that creates this effect, but instead it merely allows the user to access this state of consciousness that eludes us for most of the time, but that’s a whole other book in itself. If we imagine our main consciousness as a very bright light, which regularly outshines our other states of consciousness, then just like how sunshine renders the illuminating powers of our light bulbs to be somewhat redundant, our main consciousness can overpower our other states of consciousness to the point where we struggle to even recognise them. Thus, there are advantages to blocking the sunlight of our main consciousness.

Anyway, back to emotions. We could simplify our emotions into the basics of joy or pain, or at least our interpretations of them. Our joy/pain balance can be affected by many things, but we could argue that much of our happiness and misery is a choice, as misery can be achieved even when we have all we need or want, and happiness is attainable even when immersed in pain and misery. We all dabble in the power of perception. Many of us often only recognise or perceive emotions based on how we, as individuals, display an emotion, without understanding that different people, like different animals, express emotions in different ways.

Imagine we only had our older brains that are led by emotion to guide us. We may lack a level of insight into ourselves, but it would be enough to ensure the continuation of our species. Love ensures we care for our family, fear keeps us from danger, hate helps us protect ourselves, regret helps to avoid repeating mistakes, pain helps us avoid its causes, sadness ensures we value what is important to us. Joy and happiness help us know what to repeat, empathy and sympathy ensures we care for one another, and anger helps us deal with pain and injustice. Then of course, our instincts for lust ensures we reproduce, hunger ensures a desire to eat, and thirst ensures a desire to drink. Without our supposed relatively recent additions to our brains, we may be more led by our emotions than we already are. And we could argue whether that is a good or a bad thing, but let’s try to keep this book shortish (spoiler: failed).

The spectrums of each emotion have spectrums within spectrums. Going through each aspect of a spectrum in order to gain a complete understanding of a whole emotion can take time to experience, and if we are lucky enough, there will be some we can remain ignorant of. We are capable of contradictory emotions, and we can observe these in most individuals and groups. We can hate an individual or group while showing them compassion, as well as love an individual or group while showing them contempt.

We could argue that the ability to be cruel to those we love is a trait used more by those mired in the ignorance of differing worth. While our ability to be kind to those we hate is more common among those less interested in the delusions of elevated worth or other ignorances. Either that or we just all have differing interpretations of hate and love. It is much easier to feel emotions than it is to understand them, but whether we understand them or not, they do the jobs they have evolved for. Whether we control them to use to our advantage, more than they control us to our disadvantage, depends largely on our environments and many other factors.

Now, let’s go over a few pros and cons of our emotions by exploring the advantages in shutting them off. We can all experience the sense of feeling nothing, even for the shortest of time, but when we experience the grief of a great sorrow or trauma, we can shut off our emotions for longer periods in order to protect ourselves from continued pain. Maybe the effort of maintaining such an intense emotion for so long is why our brains hit this shut-off button as a fail-safe, or a bit like an emotional dial being turned down in our brains to avoid overload. Perhaps this emotionally paused mind exists because we can’t maintain any other emotion for as long as we can maintain an intense grief. So we stop feeling altogether as our only way of breaking its grip on us.

Most emotions are more temporary, with only an intense love coming anywhere close. This emotional void can vary in length, and even if our emotional dial goes from off to its lowest setting, we can spend years or even decades in this off to very low state, depending on the depth of pain, the comfort of habit or even due to an accumulation of sorrows. Although we all have the ability to shut off our emotions, they are really just on pause until we encounter a trigger that accesses them and allows them to flow again. Like a room in our minds that we shut off and never enter, until one day we find the door slightly ajar or thrust open.

There are some who believe those who are in this emotionally paused state of mind are cold or even mentally disturbed, with an array of conditions at the ready to attach. However, this can come from the perspective of defining someone by a reaction to a cause they know nothing about, rather than understanding the process that resulted from the cause.

So, to the advantages of the emotionally paused mind. Once established, it can be a very Zen like state of mind, as there is no extreme of emotion to cause any highs or any lows. Without heightened emotions, we rely heavily on our reason and logic to guide us, as well as our instincts and intuition. As every emotion has a cause, we can often gain a better insight into emotions within this state, as we can observe and understand the cause and effect when void of emotional attachment.

Knowledge of emotions with little or no feeling can develop an ability to see things more clearly and more accurately, as we avoid being clouded by emotion. We don’t need to feel fear to know we are in danger or feel love to be caring, kind or compassionate. Nor do we need to feel anger to understand injustice, sadness to understand loss or joy to understand the joy in something.

When we are free from emotion, we are less likely to be swayed by emotional manipulators, and as all social hierarchies manipulate their populations on an emotional level, it can be hugely advantageous to feel nothing in order to avoid falling for their nonsense. For example, if we look at those who champion any social hierarchy, outside of the usual self-serving interests, we can see many of their behaviours and beliefs are heavily based on emotion, and lacking in reason and logic.

At best, the paused mind is more aware of a lie, or at worst, it has less interest in them. Either way, we can avoid wasting our energy on status seekers or valuing their emotionally based lies, when within this emotionally paused state of mind. Life breaks us all, and within social hierarchies, there will always be those with the desire to participate in the act of breaking others, in exchange for the trappings of wealth and status. We can lose our desire for self-preservation during a great sorrow, and there can be a great freedom gained when we abandon this desire. As intense grief can free us from the will to live, there are few who appear braver than the grief-stricken.

Thinking deeply about anything can help us gain a better understanding, but it is not always the best strategy. Intuition is just our subconscious brains drawing on our experiences and knowledge at a faster rate than our conscious brains can. Very useful for tasks and situations where we need to act fast, but if we stop to think too much and ignore our intuition, we could end up in trouble or even find our pondering fatal. When we draw out our knowledge and information faster than our conscious minds can, we react intuitively instead of pausing to think.

The same goes for knowledge that we have but just can’t recall in the moment. So our intuition comes to our rescue again by letting us know we have the knowledge somewhere, before our conscious mind can access it. Instincts are habits or skills that we are born with and developed to help our survival, often to the point where the whole species shares the same traits, to become a common instinct. Our instincts and intuition often know more than we do, so we should always value them, as we all share them for a reason.

Family Ties

Another thing we share is our DNA, as we are all family. And just like any family, there are disputes, misunderstandings and wrongdoings, but we shouldn’t allow these to lose track of what we are. We are at our best when we come together as one for the benefit of all. However, this can be a rarity within large social groups, never mind a social hierarchy. It may be difficult for many of us to show others within our communities the same compassion and understanding that we would show our own immediate families. But with a little maths, let’s take a look at just how those we pass every day are just that, family.

If we take our direct ancestry alone, we all have two parents. Double the number of grandparents, then double again the number of great-grandparents and keep on doubling all the way back. It takes just ten generations back before we reach over a thousand direct ancestors. At twenty generations, we have over one million. When we reach thirty generations, we have well over one billion, and at forty generations, we have well over one trillion. We could go on, but we start to reach numbers so big that we might run out into our communities and start hugging everyone we meet while saying “hello cousin, fancy a cuppa”. OK, maybe not.

If we were to take an average of one generation being reproduced every 25 years, it would only take 250 years for ten generations, 500 years for twenty generations, 750 years for thirty generations and 1,000 years for forty generations. So from only 1,000 years ago, it has taken over one trillion people to create us. That’s more family than everyone alive today.

Now imagine if any one of those human beings, whose actions resulted in our creation, did not exist, never met or never conceived at that precise moment that they did, then we would not be here. Instead, there would be a whole different set of people who are equally as wonderful and as flawed as ourselves. It puts our existence on a personal level into perspective. Just to think about the vast randomness of what came to make us is awesome in its wonder, and when we understand this, we have a clearer understanding of who we are, as well as who we are to those around us, and they to us.

Time rolls forward for us all, but it is only when we look back that we can truly see where we are and where we are going. Most of us in any area of the globe would not have to go back too far in time to find a common ancestor we all share with others from that area. Now if we think about every one of the one trillion people, in around the one thousand years we owe our existence to, many of those people would have had brothers, sisters, cousins and other children, all of whom we are related to. It is here that we see the wider connections between us all, not to mention all those who were not direct ancestors who may have cared for, supported, or even saved the lives of our ancestors. Imagine if we all had knowledge of our family tree going back forty generations, we would not be asking if we are related, but how.

Having said all of that, these numbers are based on unique ancestors. However, we all have duplicate ancestors, as we are, after all, living on a planet that’s teeming with our cousins. Incest anyone? Now of course, there are always families that get a bit too close on occasion, but this is not to say we all descend from inbreeding, well, not too much anyway. If we imagine one of our parents’ 10-times-great-grandparents also had a sibling whose line of descendants was our other parent, then both our parents would share a common ancestor, giving us duplicate ancestors.

With over ten generations of differing genetic mixing between both parents’ lines of ancestry, there should be enough genetic diversity from our duplicate ancestry to make it far from incest, and this is more common than some of us may wish to believe. When we also factor in the limitations social hierarchies impose onto our genetic diversity, we are a lot more alike than we probably should be, and we could argue that only a species of in-breeds would value social hierarchies, but that would be to ignore how common in-breeding is among other animals and plants.

Let’s look at it the other way. Imagine we are generation zero and have two children, who themselves have two children each, who also have two children each and so on. On the tenth generation, there will be over one thousand people born, and now imagine that tenth generation all lived in the same town or city, this distant form of incest (if we call it this) is inevitable. Then the 20th generation brings us to over a million, then over one billion at the 30th and one trillion people at the 40th, all born over a thousand-year period and all with the same ancestor, YOU.

When we understand this, it’s not hard to see how any of our descendants could find themselves having children together, especially the further on we go. So it is inevitable that we are going to mate with our cousins (although the more distant the better). Knowing our parents and lovers are cousins may sound a little strange, but perfectly normal. There is no one on our planet that we are not related to. This basic understanding is important in knowing how we are all so closely connected.

Belonger/Understander

Well, that’s probably enough about how similar and close we all are to one another. So before we start to throw up, let’s get into some of those small differences and how they affect us within our social groups. When engaging with any individual on a one-to-one basis, we can see reason and logic in abundance (granted, in some more than others).

However, take the same individual and add a third person, then as we have a group, suddenly the reason and logic (in effect the truth) diminishes slightly as group factors such as social status now come into play. Every time we add another individual to the group, we often see reason and logic diminish further and further, to the point where we have a massive group that status seekers can manipulate using our desire to belong, and stupidity can reign supreme. We could almost make it a mathematical equation.

Two people plus one equals minus logic and reason squared.

2p+1= -lr²

How we behave when engaging with only one other individual can differ greatly from our behaviour within a group. When one-to-one, we can be more focused on the person we are engaging with, to a point where we can develop a more accurate read on them. This can allow us to build a level of trust with one another, so that we can be more honest with them, and them with us. When one-on-one, we can usually challenge one another’s ignorances more effectively than in a group setting. Groups and status seekers are more likely to interpret being challenged as being attacked whenever they hear something that they disagree with, or something that undermines or threatens their perceived elevated worth. So any real attempt at an honest exchange is often replaced with a display for status, which can entrench a group’s ignorances with its polarizing effect.

When we engage with a group, there are a lot more people to figure out, and there are inevitably going to be status seekers who suffer from the more-than/less-than ignorance (among others) to contend with. With the increase in numbers, social status becomes something those of us who suffer from an unbalanced ego start to jockey for. While those who have contempt for the ignorance of differing worth may try to challenge people who suffer from it, this usually proves to be a fruitless task, as they are almost always outnumbered in large groups by belongers, who will tolerate status seekers in exchange for the belonging they desire.

Elevated worth often requires an exaggerated reputation of some kind, and any self-respecting status seeker knows how to exaggerate their reputation. So exposing a truth can be interpreted as an attack on a deluded mind’s worth, when it exposes the lies on which their reputations are based upon. Once differing worth has been established in any group, it is wise to have little to do with the group, as those capable of grading some humans over others are vastly more capable of wrongdoing.

However, we don’t always have the option of avoiding such groups. This common collective of senselessness that we can call our group mentality, coupled with our ignorances, can allow groups to dehumanize others as an excuse for inflicting the wrongs upon them that are necessary in achieving elevated worth, and thus a behaviour our glorified wrongdoers always encourage. By wrapping up the self-serving intent of these wrongs as justifiable acts, we attempt to escape the consequences of our wrongs, and so our social hierarchies are born.

We all have a desire to belong and a desire to understand, but most of us sway more towards one or the other when it comes to interacting with groups, although our social hierarchy will always encourage belonging over understanding for obvious reasons. Our desire to belong is so ingrained within us that many of us will suffer psychologically (to some degree) if we are ostracised from the group we belong to, or a group we wish to belong to. Few of us can cope well psychologically with this exclusion, therefore, it has and always will be a target of manipulation for all social hierarchies in persuading others to serve their interests.

Void of a valued stable group to satisfy our desire to belong, we can be more easily exploited by those offering belonging, even when it is only an extremely superficial version. Those of us with more of a desire to belong than to understand are made to dance to the tune of our social hierarchies in order to gain any kind of acceptance.

While those of us whose desire to understand overpowers the desire to belong will always be targeted by status-seeking groups, as their desire threatens to expose the lies all elevated worth is based upon. Understanders (for want of a better term) are commonly portrayed as somehow less-than by status seekers, in order to maintain any value in their lies and to elevate or validate their belongers obedience.

Our environments play a huge role in the direction we sway. If belonging is something we lack, then we may sway more to becoming a belonger, but if we never doubt our belonging, then we can sway more towards becoming an understander. Our early family environment can be crucial in this matter, with our desire to belong fulfilled, the desire to understand can grow free from the desire to belong, as this need has already been met. If we lack a strong sense of belonging from our family in early childhood, then we can develop a strong desire to belong at the cost of the desire to understand, making us susceptible to the perceived unity of any wider group, and so be at the mercy of any group’s status seekers and ignorances.

Our desire to belong and our desire to understand can be viewed like two opposing sides of a power bar, the stronger one desire becomes, the weaker the other. Or like a spectrum of desire with belonging and understanding at each end. As belongers, we must abandon much of what we are in order to adopt the same facades as those around us, while as understanders, we are always in danger of being viewed with suspicion if we do not appear to be projecting the desired facade those around us value. Either way, we must all adjust to our groups that are shackled by status seekers and their lies.

Most status seekers (if not all) are belongers, as we need others to elevate ourselves above and to help us devalue others. Many of our status seekers suffer from the Jekyll and Hyde personality that induces polar behaviours in relation to their perceptions of status, fawning over and glorifying those they perceive to be more-than, while abusing and belittling those they perceive as less-than. In our cultures that heap praise on the selfish, it becomes necessary to heap shame and ridicule on the selfless to help avoid exposing the selfish for what they are.

In order to understand a social hierarchy, and have a desire to belong to it with all its wrongdoing, we can only achieve this if we value harm befalling others, or at the very least, don’t mind it enough, as long as it befalls others and not ourselves. It is more achievable to belong to a social hierarchy if we are ignorant of the wrongdoings they do every day, but if we understand the truths of our social hierarchies, then we make it more difficult for ourselves to accept them within ourselves, and to be accepted by them, especially if we voice those truths.

As belongers, we have to surrender much of our authenticity, as all social hierarchies are built on superficiality, and many of us are willing to pay this price in return for a degree of elevated worth, or even just a degree of acceptance. When, as a belonger, we are accepted, glorified and unharmed, while as an understander, we are ostracised, demonised, and killed, it can be worthwhile to at least mimic the belonger.

Even when it is not life or death, many of us still embrace the superficial because we know those who do not can be at the wrong end of the inequality these social structures thrive on. If we divide people within social hierarchies into belongers and understanders, or the easily suggestible and the less suggestible, the vast majority of human beings we encounter fall firmly into the belongers category.

We could argue, or in this case guesstimate, that it could be anything between 75% and 90% of people who are belongers, and the understanders being the minority within any large social group at around 10% to 25%. With the majority of us willing to override our understanding in order to belong, it is easy to see how this vulnerability within our species can be exploited by any social hierarchy.

Perhaps a more accurate percentage can be found in hypnosis and the placebo effect, as they suggest that around 20% of people are highly suggestible (belongers), and so will believe even the most obvious of lies. While around 20% of people can’t be fooled so easily (understanders), and the remaining 60% having various levels of suggestibility. This would suggest that most of us (80%) are way too eager to value suggestion over truth, but that is just a suggestion.

Our suggestibility is not always fixed and can obviously fluctuate due to varying factors. But as belongers are vastly more likely to adopt the most obvious of lies in order to gain the belonging they desire, this leads to a plethora of lies being valued and tends to create ignorances that are valued for generations. So why do so many of us surrender understanding in favour of belonging, or to put it another way, why do we value lies over the truth? Well of course, all social hierarchies are built on lies, so it is perhaps no surprise that most within them are so willing to accept them.

As lies are so numerous and the truth so devalued within these cultures of greed, it can be difficult to tell the difference between truths and lies. Social hierarchies don’t become so by being more competent, or more just, or more skilled than others. They are just the people who are more malicious than most, and more willing and organised to do very nasty things to their fellow humans, all in order to indulge in their base desires and more-than delusions. When it comes to their malice, lying is only the start. They steal, use, abuse, maim, rape and murder on such a regular basis in order to maintain their dominance over others that there is not a day that passes without their wrongs being felt by many.

So it is within this environment that we all have to navigate, and in understanding this we can see that being a belonger is not as crazy as it may first appear. By valuing the lies of a social hierarchy, we can, in turn, gain acceptance from them, or at the very least, we are tolerated. We also increase our chances of becoming part of them and becoming more-thans ourselves, as those who value the hierarchy are more likely to “succeed“ within them. This alone encourages many to become a status seeker. As belongers, we limit our chances of being targeted by the group, even if it means we surrender our integrity. But many of us are willing to trade this and more for security and belonging.

This is not to suggest that belongers are more cowardly, as survival is one of the most powerful instincts all animals have. When we sense a threat to our survival, it is only reasonable to act in a way that neutralizes that threat. So when outnumbered and confronted by a group of people who are willing to harm anyone who doesn’t bend to their will, it is arguably a wise strategy to go along with their nonsense. At least until the threat has passed. However, when that group becomes an established social hierarchy, then that threat will linger for generations and have a huge negative effect on everything around it. So we end up with these cultures of lies that are organised and controlled by self-glorifying wrongdoers.

We could divide belongers into two groups. The believers/ignorant– those who believe most, if not all, of the lies they are told by their group in order to gain belonging, acceptance and social status. And the deceivers/manipulators – those who sell the lies and/or pretend to value the lies in order to exploit the ignorances of the believers. Although we could argue that most belongers are both believers and deceivers to varying degrees. The mass appeasement of the social hierarchy allows the remaining understanders to be marginalised as the minority, in order to validate the nonsense that becomes commonplace within such groups. There is also the benefit of gaining vastly more friends and mates as a belonger, even if those relationships are more superficial. When we value what the majority values, then we have more people of a similar mindset to bond with.

The belonger’s reward for seeking belonging is more belonging. The snowball effect of belongers. When we look at many different social groups, we can see that belongers and the status seekers they spawn have to go further than just accepting their servitude to a few. They must also mimic the way their social hierarchy talks, dresses, thinks, and behaves, often to a ridiculously comical level. After a while of this mass fawning, hierarchies call this “our” cultures and traditions.

Our desire to belong is so strong that we are often at our happiest when we gain a sense of belonging by aiding the interests of others within our group, as most of us are hardwired to work together for the good of our group. This makes us vulnerable to our status seekers, who can exploit groups by appealing to this part of ourselves that we all instinctively desire to fulfil to some degree.

This leads us on to the understanders amongst us. For some, these are the sane people, the seekers, champions, and protectors of truth. Perhaps from a belonger’s point of view, understanders are the crazy ones, risking themselves in pursuit of something as meaningless as the truth. If lies keep us alive, and truths lead to our death, then to hell with the truth. After all, who wants to risk enduring a more difficult, shorter life valuing truth, when you could have an easier longer life valuing lies within any social hierarchy?

Well, for some, the truth is vastly more important to them than belonging or even the easier path to wealth and status that comes with lying to themselves and others. Valuing lies can be just as difficult an option for understanders as valuing the truth is for belongers. The sheer joy of understanding anything and everything in our world may be lost on many of our belongers, but for our understanders, it can be a compulsion. A deep need that goes beyond our base desires and even the self, as there is more meaning in one truth than in every lie ever told. But of course, all meaning is subjective, hence the differing values.

As an understander, we have a need to better understand things that go beyond ourselves and our own interests, and as obvious lies don’t sway us as much, we are not burdened with the nonsenses of belonging and the many ignorances that come with valuing any social hierarchy. This freedom from most of the nonsenses that many belongers value can give us a huge advantage in understanding, as we have fewer blinkers put on our minds. For many understanders, the effort involved in talking, dressing, thinking, and behaving like others in a group, just to gain some kind of superficial acceptance or value, is just way too futile and exhausting, and life is way too short to spend it on such things.

Perhaps it just comes down to the fact that they understand death more accurately, and in turn life, from a perspective less attached to the self in comparison to the belonger’s perspective. If we know our short time is all we get, why waste it on nonsense? Maybe the acceptance of death and our mortality, along with the desire to understand, helps to dismiss the very real threats that social hierarchies pose to people who call a lie, a lie.

Many of us find solitude difficult as we have a need for the company of others, and this, of course, has its benefits. But within the joys of solitude, we can escape the clutter that others try to contaminate our minds with. We all require a balance of the company of others and the space to be free from them (some more than others). Within solitude, we are free from the judgements of others, regardless of their level of validity.

Here we can grow beyond the confines of our groups or cultures, but if we go too far, even when on the path of truth, we can attract the disapproving minds of those around us. Being right or accurate about something our group is not ready to accept rarely goes smoothly. When confronted with an inconvenient truth, groups tend to attack the individuals voicing the truth, rather than studying what is being voiced or the subject matter in any great detail.

Isolation always has its cons. When we only have our own mind to sculpt our understandings, we can limit our level of awareness. No one to ask or explain, and no one to throw out ideas or bounce them off. Nothing but our own minds, unless we have the minds of others in the way of a book, for example. We can, of course, achieve solitude even when surrounded by others every day of our lives, as our minds can create the most impregnable fortresses when given the need to repel others, as many of us do when surrounded by liars and wrongdoers.

Total isolation from the minds of others can be heaven for some, and hell for others. We could argue that for belongers, this would be hell, and for understanders, heaven, if we are to oversimplify these groups. The mind of the understander could be said to accept itself, and thus it has little need for the acceptance of others, whereas the belonger’s mind may struggle to accept itself enough, hence its need for the acceptance of others.

Social hierarchies, or most groups for that matter, create some kind of identity that they try to inflict upon their followers as a way of branding those who belong to the group. These followers then attach the group’s identity onto their own personal identity, to the point where any criticism of the group’s identity is interpreted as an attack on the individual. We are encouraged to join them or be against them, even if we have no interest either way. Many of us pick group X or group Y in order to be labelled friend of one group, and foe to another, just to play the game of our master’s pawns.

The very existence of people who have their own strong identity (and/or have no need to adopt the superficial identities of hierarchies or groups) is always a threat to any such group. By not using any group’s identifying terms, we undermine their lies by merely disregarding them. Outsiders, or loners as our status seekers like to call them, who distance themselves from any fake identity, must be belittled, mocked and even harmed in order to validate the follower’s choice to value lies. This, in turn, encourages obedience to the group, as few wish to experience this mistreatment. All of our fictitious identities are variants of the same theme, which always tend to revolve around how special those within the group are, and how ordinary or awful those outside the group are. The basic more-than/less-than nonsense.

If we engage with these kinds of groups using reason and logic, or if we fail to pander to the glorification of the group or their lies, we are often met with hostility. Defending the group becomes more important than the truth to many followers/belongers, as it is perceived to demonstrate loyalty to the group and its controllers, regardless of any right or wrong. Today, the need to protect our group’s lies often results in pointless “debates” between groups and sub-groups, as each sticks to the lies they have come to self-identify with. Thus, we commonly end up with the constant bickering and belittling that maintains divisions, rather than uniting us with the truth. A thing all social hierarchies orchestrate their victims to avoid.

Once we tie ourselves and our identity to a fiction, we limit much of what we are in order to fit into the parochial identities of any group. This leads us to be against much of the things we are, just to be seen by wrongdoers as worthy of our existence. This collective delirium can be observed within every social hierarchy, as well as many other groups.

Maybe one day, most of us will understand that we are all the same, regardless of what we like to sell ourselves as. But until then we must endure our status seekers, their social hierarchies and the divisions they profit so much from. We have no doubt had many groups in our past that fulfil both our desire to belong and our desire to understand equally. However, no social hierarchy can ever achieve such a thing.

When we accept ourselves, we have little need for the facades we use as belongers in order to create a persona that we believe is necessary to gain any acceptance we crave. As it is common for us as belongers to mock those who do not require the acceptance of others, perhaps we are attempting to mask our own failings to accept ourselves. We could argue it comes down to a difference in meaning. For the belonger, meaning comes from our relationships and status within a group, whereas the understander holds meaning in knowledge and truth, regardless of its popularity.

For a social hierarchy, those who seek solitude can be seen as a threat, as in solitude, there is more freedom from the controlling dogma they work so hard to saturate their populations with. We could argue that it is just as simple as wanting to belong to the most violently dominant group that turns most of us into belongers, in a bid to avoid harm. This will always cause many of us to attach our own identity to fictions and ignorances that would never gain any worth in a culture free from differing worth.

As belonging and its practices are important to avoid harm, we see this even in the naming of our children, as in many cultures the poor (or less/thans) give their children names that are common to their hierarchy (or more-thans) in order to gain acceptance. While the wealthy can give their children uncommon names, as they can afford to buy their acceptance. Within our cultures of exclusiveness, the disenfranchised are common, so belonging to something or anything becomes a real desire among many. Many of us spend much of our lives playing roles we feel we must play in order to gain some kind of belonging.

Within our cultures of differing worth, it is inevitable that many are going to believe they are not good enough in some way, or too good for others. Whether we indulge ourselves in feelings of inadequacy or superiority, we are using these ignorances to avoid who and what we truly are by allowing ourselves to be compared to others, without a complete understanding of all the elements involved. There is nothing we do psychologically that has not been done before, and there is nothing we feel that has not been felt before. We may be the echoes of those who came before us, and the sculptors of those who come after us, but we are no more or no less than any of them.

So there are pros and cons to being a belonger or an understander. Some of us may even float between the two with the perfect balance of belonging and understanding that our hierarchy finds acceptable. To overly simplify our belonger/understander balance, we choose between security and safety in numbers, or freedom from others’ ignorances. Of course, we don’t always choose what pros or cons we prefer. The traits that sway us in one direction or another, are for the most part, made in our early years of life, or even arguably before that.

Our cultures of differing worth encourage belongers to an extreme degree, and discourages understanders for obvious reasons. So the environments and experiences we all endure influence these traits too. It is also common for us, as both belongers and understanders, to feel like we don’t belong, even if we try so hard to. After all, every social hierarchy needs to exclude the majority of people from their smaller, more-than group, in order to convince themselves and others to value their deluded elevated worth.

As social hierarchies want people to behave in a way that allows them to be easily exploited, the elusive carrot of belonging is used to manipulate their victims’ behaviours. They have no desire to get those they see as less-than to belong to their group. If everyone did belong, then it would no longer be a social hierarchy, and they would lose their delusions needed to portray themselves as special.

So if given a choice to live a lie with some kind of social value, or live true while being oppressed, ridiculed and belittled within these cultures, who are we to judge the choice of others without fully understanding the environments that mould our belonging/understanding balance? As belongers, we pay the cost of belonging, just as understanders, we pay the cost for understanding. Everything has its price.

It is important to note that although we are categorizing our psychological mindsets and behaviours into belongers and understanders, this is only in order to explain a small aspect within the subtleties of our individual behaviours within groups and social hierarchies, and by no means are we defining anyone by these terms alone.

We are all belongers and understanders, and so much more. This is merely to recognise a difference in the approach we can take to things. Like how our desire to belong can leave us susceptible to those with a controlling role within our groups, leading to us becoming more of a belonger or a status seeker. While our desire to understand can leave us so focused on truth, which in turn makes us very sceptical of those in controlling roles, leading to us becoming more of an understander. We are just highlighting a small difference within us when it comes to our psychology and behaviours within a group.

This applies to any form of categorising we may do in order to understand a behaviour or trait we are all familiar with. After all, we are all the same animal, and so all susceptible to the same things. Once we begin to define one another by our small differences, we start to polarize ourselves and others, and before we know it, we abandon all understanding in favour of adopting the more-than/less-than ignorances and run the risk of becoming a valued member of a hierarchal society, as polarizing their populations is exactly what social hierarchies must encourage to make it easier to gain and maintain control over them.

A divided population is more susceptible to extreme exploitation than a united one, thus it is a practice we will always endure with such groups. By promoting their lies to beliefs, social hierarchies can take advantage of our collective desire to belong. Manufacturing a population of believers is always more beneficial to a social hierarchy than aiding the creation of a population of knowers.

With all social hierarchies based on some being seen as more-than others, merely as an excuse for some to take more than most within that group, few are content with feeding the greed of a few at their own expense. So all of these societies are forged and held together with force. The reason the majority of people who walk this planet have to endure these cultures of greed is because most, if not all of us, have this internal desire to be seen as more-than in the eyes of others. It is part of being human, whether we like it or not.

The Humble Ego

This desire to be special in some way (often anyway) lies within us all, and it is something we can all benefit from using, hence why we all have it. Today, we use the term ego to describe the part of us that manifests this desire, and no matter how hard we try, we will all succumb to our ego at some point (some more than others), although we can learn to control it, rather than being controlled by it. The ego acts like blinkers, narrowing our understanding and blinding us to the full spectrum of reality. Very useful when we wish to believe we are more than others.

The ego is a very useful tool we can all use to help us achieve something, as well as maintain or enhance our self-worth, but if we fail to recognise it, we can overuse it to blind ourselves to reality. Like most things in life, a balance is always best. If we fail to understand our ego, we fail to understand ourselves. If we understand ourselves, then we have less need for our ego.

A balanced ego is a beautiful thing that allows us to know our worth, as well as our insignificance, without defining ourselves or others by it. Whereas an unbalanced ego will encourage us to exaggerate our worth or significance, and define ourselves and others by the false perceptions this produces. To ward off an unbalanced ego in favour of a balanced one, we must value ourselves enough to know that no one is more-than we are, but not so much that we believe we are more-than others. However, this is easier said than done for most of us within cultures that encourage our status-seeking self-congratulatory practices. It is wise to ensure we never tether our ego to our self-esteem, or we will forever be at its mercy.

Solitude tends to sculpt a balanced ego for the simple reason that we have no one else to feed our desire to be special, along with the fact that when we are forced to be more self-reliant, it leaves little room for delusions of grandeur. Unbalanced groups, on the other hand, tend to mould the unbalanced ego, as we need to feed our delusions of more-than to seek elevated worth. When void of others to compare ourselves with, we spend more time examining ourselves, rather than others, as when in a group.

Solitude spares us from the superficiality that hierarchal groups wallow in, and this alone can give us a more accurate understanding of ourselves and our ego. Having to do everything for ourselves also spares us any illusions of being above others in doing certain tasks. In solitude, we have no lies to be convinced of or to convince others of. No status to be won or lost. No cheerleaders or belittlers trying to glorify or demonise their or our actions. No one’s narrative to follow or aspire to, and no human grading, social ladder or class to be positioned within. In effect, the ego can become largely redundant when devoid of an audience to display it to.

In the battle between ego and understanding, ego tends to use beliefs as its most common weapon of choice, while understanding prefers using knowledge. It is the paradox of the ego that even when we are aware of it and can use our understanding of it to control our use of it, we can always argue that this understanding and awareness is just in itself our ego controlling us into valuing a self-indulgent ignorance, rather than us actually controlling it.

It is no surprise that all social hierarchies prefer to promote our egoism for its leanings towards selfish beliefs, rather than our understanding, as groups that value beliefs above knowledge are much easier to manipulate than any group that values knowledge and understands what beliefs are, as well as their limitations. We could argue that when it comes to our social groups, egoism is their biggest failing, which in turn means our social hierarchies are our biggest group failures, but good luck trying to convince any unbalanced ego of that.

No chapter or even book is big enough to explore all that we are. But hopefully, we have touched upon enough of our key elements in order to understand what makes large populations susceptible to being manipulated by a few. Speaking of elements, let’s finish this chapter not with who we are, but with what we are, just to keep our egos in check, if for nothing else.

We are all made up of the same stuff, and almost 99% of what we are is made up of just 6 elements. We are predominantly made up of the third most abundant element in the universe, oxygen (65%), followed by carbon (18%), hydrogen (10%), nitrogen (3%), calcium (1.5%) and phosphorus (1%), with potassium (0.4%), sulphur (0.3%), sodium (0.2%), chlorine (0.2%), and magnesium (0.1%), as well as our main trace elements of boron, chromium, cobalt, copper, fluoride, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, silicon, tin, vanadium and zinc. If more of us understand this, then perhaps our standards of nutrition would be much higher, but more about that later.

The iron flowing through our blood was forged in the death throes of giant stars, and is among the most stable of all elements. Just understanding one element of ourselves is fascinating enough, so imagine how fascinating we truly are, void of status seekers trying to belittle others for their superficial elevated worth.

Parts of us are billions of years old, as the atoms within the elements that make us what we are have been recycled more times than a politician’s speech. Just living with the knowledge that we are well-aged and forged from the embers of stars is enough to ignite our thirst for more knowledge (for some more than others). Now knowing we are mostly oxygen is not essential in understanding how we function within groups, but in the effort to understand ourselves more completely (or as close as we can get), it always helps to understand all that make us, us.

The sheer wonder of our existence can often be easily overlooked when we are trapped within groups that glorify the worst of us, over the true wonders that are all around us. If we truly know ourselves, then we know every other human to walk this earth. The problem is, many of us don’t get to explore all that we are, and even if we did, would we acknowledge all that we are accurately?

In order to understand ourselves, we must understand others, as we or no single individual is an expression of all that we are or could be. So empathy becomes our greatest tool in understanding from the knowledge of others, as a way to understand ourselves without having to experience everything first-hand.

However, being highly empathic is more of a curse within our social hierarchal cultures, and this plays a role in why many of us lack in accepting or even exploring who and what we are beyond our group’s perceptions. We are all (to some degree or another) dumb and smart, hateful and loving, forgiving and spiteful, selfish and generous, rightful and wrongful, aware and unaware, cruel and kind…etc...etc.

It is common within hierarchies to cherry-pick from all that we are and define ourselves by the cherries we want in our basket. But without accepting all that we are, we often devalue and delude ourselves in the vain attempt to be perceived as more-than. In the end, whether we allow others to imprint their perceptions of who and what we are onto us, or we create our own, whatever realm of perspective we choose to dabble in, most of us will stick to those perceptions as long as we gain some worth or value from them.

We are what we do and not all that we say. Thus, our actions define us more than our words. But within cultures controlled by status seekers, all are defined by their lies. We must question ourselves to understand others and question others to understand ourselves. Either way, despite what our glorified wrongdoers may say, questioning everything is always a good habit to practice if we value understanding, but not so much if we value differing worth.

Chapter 2

Ignorances

We all have them. Whole cultures are built around them. We may live our whole lives valuing them. Our social hierarchies encourage them, and we harm, kill, and die for them. We are born ignorant of much, and we can acquire a lot more ignorances as we navigate through life. However, possessing the ability to recognise them, not just in others, but also in ourselves, is a talent of great value.

When we know what we know and know what we don’t know, we know more than most. If we think about the millions of years humans have walked this planet, and all the knowledge we have acquired and lost in that time, for every bit of truth we discovered and experienced, there have inevitably been countless ignorances valued in the minds of those in different times and places. For many of us, it is often easier to recognise the ignorances of those from a different time or place than it is to recognise them in our own.

No matter where or when we are, our ignorances will always magnify the differences between us, thus making them an essential tool for all glorified wrongdoers as a socially divisive force. Our ignorance is responsible for more wrongdoing than our malice, making the most ignorant within any group the most dangerous to those they share their time and space with.

As the ignorant can be persuaded to value almost any lie, they are always the best tools to aid in the tyranny we practice every day. So we will always be encouraged to adopt the ignorances our social hierarchies elevated worth relies upon, and by rewarding the ignorant with wealth and status, hierarchies ensure they have a great depth of wrongdoers that are willing and even eager to violate their own kin.

We could divide many of our ignorances into two groups. A known ignorance and a belief-based ignorance. A known ignorance is an ignorance which we know we possess, as we can know we are ignorant of many different things. So we can define this type of ignorance as little more than a lack of knowledge.

A belief ignorance is an ignorance we don’t recognise as such, and mistakenly promote to a belief or even knowledge (or our perceptual knowledge), as we can take a small piece of knowledge and crowbar our ignorances into any perception we wish. So we can define a belief ignorance as a lie we have come to value, when we fail to differentiate between a theory/guess and a perceived truth, from the truth.

We could say that a belief ignorance is a learned ignorance, and a known ignorance is a born ignorance. When we are very young, we are mostly free from the plethora of learned ignorances that those who were born before us have come to champion, and with the more knowledge we gain as we age, the more born ignorances we shed. However, the more immersed we are within our cultures governed by liars, or the more belonging and status we seek, the more learned ignorances we tend to adopt.

The ability to recognise lies and avoid the ignorances they produce is crucial for developing accurate understandings of anything from the information we acquire. For as every lie we adopt or create, we must adopt or generate many more lies in order to maintain the original lie. This leads to new, ever-growing branches of lies stemming from the root of the original lie. This multiplication of ignorances is a process that comes with valuing lies, and is the other side of the same coin of the multiplication of knowledge process that comes with valuing truths. Ignorance can create a desire for more ignorances, just as knowledge can create a desire for more knowledge.

Now we are all believers, and we are all knowers. That is to say, there are things we all know nothing about, so we often make guesses, and we sometimes promote those guesses to a belief. Then there are all the things we know, the truths that we have experienced first-hand and are certain of, we call this our knowledge. Our beliefs can be our own or adopted from others, but we have no first-hand knowledge of our beliefs, if we did, then they would no longer be a belief, it would become knowledge. So we know what we know, and we believe what we believe, and now and then we can all confuse the two.

As a belief is the presence of doubt and knowledge is the absence of doubt, we can’t know a belief or believe what we know, unless we have forgotten what we know, something many of us succumb to as we age. When in doubt about whether information is a lie or a truth, it is wise to never promote it beyond information and certainly never past a belief, until we know it to at least align with some of what we know. When we promote any information to knowledge, we risk promoting a lie to a truth or demoting a truth to a lie, but if we have enough related knowledge, then our beliefs can often hold true.

As belongers, we are more susceptible to adopting the lies of any group we seek belonging to, and are often among the most eager to promote those lies to a belief, void of much or even any scrutiny. When blinded by the desire to belong, or many other desires for that matter, there can be little difference between an obvious lie and perceptual knowledge, so it is within this realm of ignorance that we inflict the majority of our wrongs upon each other. It can be much easier for us to validate our ignorances, than it is for us to challenge them, especially if we have been encouraged to attach our own identity to an ignorance in the way many of us are within our cultures of hate.

With our fictitious psychological identities, we can become so attached to an ignorance that it becomes almost impossible for us to even contemplate the lies we have pinned onto our own personal being. Even when such a lie is exposed to us, we can struggle to accept the existence of the lie. Denial can be a useful tool when clinging to an identity, but if our denial weakens or the truth becomes undeniable, then we risk entering the realm of the identity crisis. Thus, it is understandable that for most of us that use fictitious identities, or other gross ignorances, we prefer the lesser challenging psychological process of denial, over the wrench of recognising our ignorances. This can lead us to hate not just the truth, but the source of any truth that challenges our identity.

As we are a sociable species that loves to be part of a group, being sociable is a trait that can be of great value within a benevolent group. However, within our status-seeking, social hierarchal malevolent groups, this trait can make us vulnerable to their manipulations. As flattery makes friends and truth makes enemies within all our hierarchal groups that are built on lies, we can understand why many of us love to be lied to, but it is unwise to rely on those who practice or surrender to flattery, if we wish to avoid being too ignorant.

All social hierarchies like to force their identities onto their followers/victims in order to keep them firmly under their control, and the more people our social hierarchies can convince or force their identities onto, the more people they can exploit. By using fictions and selling overly glorified, yet basic human traits, as being exclusive to their group alone, our social hierarchies encourage many within their control to attach their identify to these fictions and traits, while perceiving others outwith their group as lacking as human beings in some way. When we don’t understand who and what we are, we are more open to identifying with fictions and ignorances.

If we allow ourselves to attach our own identity to any group and their ignorances, we become ripe for exploitation. Ironically, many of us join groups to avoid or reduce our chances of being exposed to the exploitation of groups, only to succumb to the exploitations of the groups we join. But when almost all of our groups promote human exploitation as a virtue, it can be difficult to avoid. We can gain value within a group if we share the same ignorances, but in chasing validation from others, we can fall into the identity trap. If we define ourselves by the limited definitions of any social hierarchy, then we can ignore many parts of ourselves, while exaggerating the parts we glorify or champion as our own.

We are all guilty of mistaking a lie or a belief for a truth, because we are all guilty of trusting information from others, just as we can gain knowledge from the same process. If we were to remove all of our trust in the information we receive from others, we would rarely mistake a lie or a belief for a truth, but also rarely accept or absorb the knowledge of others either, should they have any worth sharing.

As understanders, we are more likely to miss out on acquiring knowledge from others, as blind trust never comes easy when we understand the level of lies and ignorances we are exposed to. However, as lies are more prevalent in hierarchal groups than truths are, we could argue that it is a better strategy to assume everything is a lie, until proven otherwise, than vice versa.

We all have our own level of trust in others that determines how much we value the information they give. In this era of ease in which our mass information wars are conducted, our social hierarchies have never been so prolific in their efforts to sell their lies, in an attempt to keep any truths at arm’s length from their populations.

With the communication ability of the computer age, many can now voice and even show the truth on a public platform, much easier than ever before. So it is inevitable that our social hierarchies will constantly try to belittle those who share any inconvenient truths, with as many lies as they can muster. Knowing many, if not most of their populations, will value and even adopt this behaviour, as it is much easier to mock than to understand.

As our digital public forums are mostly under the control of our hierarchies, the truth can be swept away into the fringes of our societies with a tsunami of lies, or the more fashionable term of misinformation, as our prolific liars like to call it. In a world where truth is the enemy, we must view all information with a critical mind if we are to get close to the truth. Although not always a good thing to do if wealth and status are our goals. So swings and roundabouts.

How we perceive the information we receive can depend on how it fits into our own existing knowledge, ignorances and beliefs. When we share the same knowledge, ignorances and beliefs as those around us, then we tend to encourage similar interpretations of information. Any information that complements our knowledge, ignorances or beliefs is more likely to be perceived as a truth, even when it is a lie. Whereas any information that goes against our knowledge, ignorances or beliefs is more likely to be perceived as a lie, even when it is true. Our relationship with reality can be a fickle one, as our perceptions of reality relies on the contents of our minds, so we should be careful what we fill them with if we value accurate understandings.

As social hierarchies delude themselves into believing some are more than others, they are handicapped with ignorances from their very conception, and go on to spiral into a vortex of ignorances in order to maintain their founding ignorances. The worst type of ignorances are those that cause harm to others, at least in the minds of those who define harm as a bad thing. Then again, we all have our own idea of harm.

For some, being offended at human behaviour or the sounds we make are judged to be harmful, but to take offence or not to take offence at such things is often a conditioned decision rather than an instinctive reaction to reality. Although for our hierarchies professional offence-takers, the decision to take offence can of course be a very profitable one. So, for the sake of argument, we shall define harm as physical harm. Therefore, anything from assault to murder (and arguable even stealing, and non-physical harm as anything from words we don’t like to psychological abuse (excluding the hyper-offendables).

We inflict these wrongs upon others for many reasons, such as greed, anger, hate, malice, fear, jealousy…etc. But our desire to be more-than others, arguably, plays the biggest role in our wrongdoing, and most of our status is based on the harm we inflict upon others. Seeing ourselves as the good guys and our victims as the bad guys, helps us psychologically to harm those who have done no wrong or those we believe to be less than ourselves, as well as aid in maintaining support from our followers.

All social hierarchies encourage their populations to believe in the dehumanizing of their victims with the infantile caricatures of good guys and bad guys. And of course, it is always the hierarchy and those who feed their greed that are labelled as the good guys, even when it is abundantly clear that they are anything but good.

Then there is our ego. Ignorance is a strength and a weakness of our ego, in that it can blind us to the difficulty of a task, therefore aiding us in its completion, or it can blind us to the wrongs we commit, leaving us ignorant of the consequences our actions inflict upon others. When we have enough knowledge, we can have more control of our ego, as knowledge can help us remove ourselves from ourselves. That is to say that we can see our world objectively and not just from our own self-centred perspective (or even from a perspective inflicted upon us by others), but from every perspective we have knowledge of. Empathy may be discouraged within all who serve social hierarchies, but it lies within us all (some more than others) and is essential in controlling and balancing our ego.

When we feed our ego, we get a distorted view of ourselves, just as we do when we starve it. Our desire to believe we are special has a lot to answer for when it comes to the encyclopaedia of ignorances we have created. So let’s ponder over some of the most common ignorances that our social hierarchies suffer from and inflict upon the populations they control, regardless of the time or place in which they exist.

The More-than/Less-than Ignorances

The need to be perceived as more-than others is important for all status seekers and the social hierarchies they produce. These ignorances encompass an ever-growing group of ignorances, all structured on the same foundations, lies. We use these ignorances to grade each human being or group of human beings, based upon the exaggeration of a small or imaginary difference. Whether its social status, race, wealth, geography of birth, gender, age or any number of the endless excuses we use to declare ourselves as superior to others, matters little to most status seekers, as long as the end result is an elevated worth in comparison to those around them.

As status seekers, we will use anything we can to belittle others in an attempt to elevate ourselves, and there are few ignorances we refuse to use in order to achieve this. Social hierarchies obviously have to promote such behaviour, as they need to sell themselves as more-than others. Let’s look at social status, which is based on the ignorance of differing worth, as an example of such behaviour, as we could argue that all more-than/less-than ignorances are an attempt to gain social status over others.

When we suffer from this ignorance, we can believe we are more deserving than most. We may even value social status more than we value ourselves, to the point where our view of who we are is interlinked with our social status. To distinguish a level of skill or knowledge in any particular field from one person to another is one thing, but to go beyond appreciating someone’s skill or knowledge in order to elevate them as more-than others is only possible with the aid of an array of ignorances.

Status within a particular field to grade competency in that field can be very useful and necessary, but when that spills over into social status, this is where our ignorances spiral out of control. As status seekers control our large groups, it is they who determine what does and what does not deserve elevated worth, so there is no surprise that everything that panders to their ignorances and lies are awarded higher status than anything else.

Their environments of deceit allow these ignorances to flourish. The lunacy of glorifying an individual who excels at one particular task or in one particular environment, is exposed when the same individual shows their complete and utter incompetence within other tasks or environments.

We could argue this is why social hierarchies prefer a specialist culture, rather than an arguably faster evolving generic one, as this could result in fewer people valuing the social status ignorances if vastly more people are given the opportunity to achieve a high level of competence in many fields. But of course, this could be giving such cultures vastly more credit than they deserve, as mass incompetence and inefficiency is inevitable when we gauge people’s abilities on their level of obedience to their masters.

***

There are so many more-than/less-than ignorances that we could fill a whole book with them alone. So we shall instead just go over a few that are very common.

The ignorance of differing worth

This is the bedrock of all our more than/less than ignorances. As a social species, we could argue that we, like other social animals, have the need to vary the worth of individuals within our groups, as it is part of our sexual nature. However, there are many things that are part of our nature that we try to avoid, to aid our groups. To elevate the worth of one individual above another requires extreme self-interest that encourages an ignorance in the worth of others.

This equates social status to an ignorance in the same way as raping and murdering are acts committed by those ignorant of their victims’ worth, even if they are all part of our nature (for some more than others). As difficult as it may be to believe for those of us who attach our worth to our social standing within a group, or even those of us surrounded by people jockeying for elevated worth, we have many individuals and groups that do not suffer from this ignorance.

If we are to believe our habitual liars’ idea of human history, in regards to our apparent relatively recent transition from hunter/gatherer groups to social hierarchal farming groups, then we could argue our use of extreme social status is relatively recent too, or at least to the extreme level we know too well today. For our glorified wrongdoers, it may be ridiculous to suggest that we could have had many groups that valued all within them, instead of just our modern groups that overvalue their wrongdoers, but our modern behaviour makes it no less plausible. Many groups would have treated their wrongdoers very differently than our social hierarchal groups do. The ignorance of differing worth is merely the glorification of exploitation and wrongdoing, as well as those who engage in and benefit from it.

The intelligence ignorance

This is where we define our intelligence based on our own set of ignorances. Intelligence within any species is barely measurable, but this does not stop many from believing they are more or less intelligent than others.

The brain, like any organ, can malfunction and be damaged, but outwith this, our level of intelligence is pretty much the same. Knowledge can vary from person to person, but this has nothing to do with intelligence.

We are all geniuses, and we are all idiots, in that there are things we all understand completely, and things we have completely no understanding of. Most of our understanding of anything is usually somewhere in-between, so it is only from our own perspective of understanding that we see the idiot and genius in others, or ourselves.

Social hierarchies have to encourage the idea that some are so much more intelligent than others, as they can benefit hugely if they promote those who value their lies as intelligent, and those who question them as less intelligent. It also helps in attempting to justify the gross inequalities they inflict upon their populations, by convincing them that their hierarchy deserves so much more than they do because of their imaginary superior intelligence.

For this reason, their education systems are always extremely poor in order to promote this ignorance, hence why they are heavily laden with dogma and light on any real knowledge. If we base intelligence simply on our own knowledge, then we know nothing about intelligence and even less about our ignorances.

The moral superiority ignorance

This is when we fool ourselves or others into thinking that the behaviours and the actions we commit, even when they cause others harm, are done out of some kind of virtue, while declaring those who commit the same behaviours and acts, as less moral in some way, and ignoring the fact that most of our behaviours and actions are done out of our own self-interests, not any superior ability to be moral.

Our morals and principles are little more than delusions for most of us, as the morals or principles we use as part of our identity are often discarded the moment we are threatened with harm or death. If we are told to harm or kill those who harm no one, and refuse without any consequences, then most of us can hold onto these delusions. However, when we are told to harm or kill those who have harmed no one, or be harmed or killed ourselves, then our endless wars prove that most of us will abandon any sense of morality, even if we can still delude ourselves into thinking we have not.

Even those of us with all the best intentions in the world can distort the harm we cause others and sell it as being somehow in the name of good. However, good or bad intentions can be meaningless in comparison to our actions. So it is within the realm of deluded intent where many of us who commit acts of harm upon our fellow humans prefer to reside in an attempt to justify the wrongs we do.

This ignorance is used by all social hierarchies to convince themselves and the individuals within their forces, as well as others, that they are serving a moral cause, rather than the same cause everyone under a hierarchy serves, the greed of a few. Every social hierarchy is immoral by nature, as they must immerse themselves in wrongdoing in order to achieve their elevated worth, but this does not stop our most prolific liars, hypocrites and wrongdoers from monopolising morality and using it as a weapon, as they do with most things.

Armed with this ignorance, we are encouraged to engage in many wrongs in order to force the will of our hierarchies upon others. As servants of a social hierarchy, when we commit wrongs against others while convincing ourselves that our actions are right and even virtuous, we tend to pass our culpability onto the entity or authority we see as being above us, rather than accepting responsibility for our own actions. But we are what we do, not what we think or what we say.

The winner/loser ignorance

This one is always worth a giggle. If infected by this ignorance, we can define ourselves and others as winners or losers depending on our own particular values and ignorances. This ignorance also allows the user to devalue others while elevating themselves, so again, very useful within hierarchal cultures. We are all winners, and we are all losers, as we all experience both, but those who suffer from this ignorance can be oblivious to what is lost in a win and what is won in a loss, as well as seeing wins and losses where there are none.

This ignorance is so entrenched within most of our status seekers that even their manufactured and pre-planned wins come with status attached to them. This ignorance infects even the most mundane of activities. One common example is the competitive conversation that takes place far too often when engaging with those who suffer from this affliction. There is no real attempt to share or exchange knowledge or connect with our fellow human beings to any real depth. Instead the superficial level of declaring a victor of some kind holds more worth than sharing knowledge, ideas or understanding.

With the desire to win a conversation rather than have a conversation, we are more concerned with convincing the audience we are right, than anything else. Even if that audience is only the individual we are talking to. However, within the confines of a social hierarchy, this makes perfect sense when lies hold great value, as the truth does not need to be won in order to exist. But our liars’ elevated worth does.

We all win our lives, and we all lose our lives, we all win, and we all lose in-between, but those who believe they are winners tend to exaggerate their wins and fall silent on their losses. Again, the environments of hate that our status seekers create play a large role in the proliferation of this ignorance.

Winning itself can be subjective, as we can all have different ideas on what is worth winning and what is not. Many who suffer from this ignorance can be baffled by others who have no interest in the superficial wins they value so much, just as those who are free from this ignorance can be baffled by those who obsess over their perceived wins.

Within the confines of our social hierarchies, winners are defined by those who value what their hierarchys values, as well as those who serve their hierarchy’s interests the most. While losers are defined by those who serve them the least, hence why our hierarchies support their winners as they champion the more-than/less-than ignorances they profit hugely from, and belittle those not as keen on bowing to their wrongs. Valuing this ignorance can lead to us attaching our identity to a win or a loss, and when we do this, our minds can become easily unbalanced.

If we all had a 400-trillion-to-one shot of being born (we could even argue higher odds) and around a 220 billion to 1 chance of being the sperm that fertilised our mother’s egg, how many of us who call ourselves winners, define ourselves by beating those odds to win our lives? Within groups of “winners”, the group has already lost, but many are just too mired in themselves and their own delusions to care or recognise it.

We are all of our past, present and future, and more than a sliver of a sliver of the time in which our perceived wins existed. We all lose what we had, have and will have, so defining ourselves and others by the inevitable is all rather nonsensical, as we all start and end the same way, but our ignorances can magnify the differences of our middles. We should remember that every winner within one field is a loser within many others, but few self-respecting “winners” want to hear that.

The gender superiority ignorance

This is a true mainstay among our large-scale social hierarchies, mostly because they are almost exclusively created and occupied by males. Few females need a definition of this ignorance, so they may wish to skip to the next one. This is of course where males believe they are superior to females, but perhaps somewhere or somewhen, there have been or will be large social groups who believe females are superior to males.

However, for now, we shall stick to the more common male superiority ignorance. As males do not bear the burden of creating more humans, they can be forgiven for feeling that anything they do is comparatively inferior. Perhaps this is why many status seekers try so hard to belittle females as a way of bringing this uniquely female achievement down, while pushing male achievements up.

This attempt to level and surpass any male-female achievement score, by our status-seeking-males, leads to an array of ignorances that declare males as superior to females. As the differences of the sexes are magnified by these ignorances, those who suffer from them can show a remarkable degree of apathy for their fellow human beings.

Of course, no sex is superior to the other, but within the confines of a social hierarchy (where humans are divided by ignorances and are graded by their worth to their hierarchy that is predominantly or even exclusively male), it is no surprise that even our sex is used by our hierarchies as a way to divide and grade the populations they control.

This ignorance is usually based on the differing levels in abilities of the sexes, so all the abilities that males have an advantage in are often heralded as justification for this ignorance, while totally ignoring all of the abilities that females have an advantage in. As our social hierarchies revere violence and males have an advantage in our ability to be violent, this plays a role in females being awarded less status within groups that shower status upon the most violent.

With females having many more genes than males, due to an extra X chromosome compared with the smaller male Y chromosome, we could make the argument that this makes females genetically superior to males, and may go some way to explain their ability to outlive males as well as other advantages, but this is just an example of how we can turn any difference into an ignorance of superiority or inferiority, should we choose to, instead of just recognising our differences for what they are and why we have them.

The dehumanizing ignorance

Another very crucial ignorance for our status seekers. This is used to sell their wrongdoing as something to be valued in order to justify harming those who do no wrong. We see this ignorance imposed onto those that share truths no hierarchy wants their slaves to understand, or those who seek to right a wrong inflicted by a hierarchy.

Their monsters and bogeymen (not a lot of bogeywomen out there, funnily enough) are all caricatures of those that represent some kind of threat to a hierarchy’s dominance over their populations, or even other hierarchies. This ignorance is often used to get the slave classes to support their own enslavement by siding with or supporting the nonsense this ignorance inspires.

As status seekers, we are capable of suffering from this ignorance when it suits our needs, and we can argue that we did not necessarily evolve to care for, or even respect, all within our species. But seeing others as less than human is an ignorance that blinds us from very basic truths. We may use it to avoid recognising the parts of us we wish to pretend only exists within those we wish to demonise, or as a way of justifying our own actions, but this ignorance allows many to glorify or demonise in accordance with perceptions, while ignoring reality.

***

Now, in an attempt to save a few trees (or KB’s), we shall end the forever-growing more-than/less-than ignorances there, and move on to a few other common ignorances our groups and social hierarchies like to champion.

Other Common Ignorances

The shared injustice ignorance

This is where victims of a wrong or an injustice demand that others experience the same injustice in order for the victims to feel some kind of misplaced justice. If we take a group of people and force or convince them to accept or at least tolerate an injustice that benefits those inflicting the injustice, then those who experience the injustice can look on those who avoid or refuse to accept the injustice and feel that they too should be exposed to the injustice.

They can even blame their suffering on those who are free from the injustice, rather than looking to those who inflict it upon them. Those who suffer from this ignorance can come to believe the injustices they experience should be shared or inflicted on everyone (except of course, the perpetrators or those benefiting from it), rather than addressing the injustice, because that may seem more difficult to them.

Victims are of course, encouraged by those who inflict the injustice to blame those avoiding it, but perhaps there is an element of envy towards those who avoid the harm they endure, rather than just total ignorance of their plight. Many may not even perceive the injustice as such, and go beyond accepting the injustice to actually valuing it.

When this ignorance is shared by the majority of the group, they can pressurise individuals or groups within the group in order to attempt to make them believe they are in the wrong for not accepting the injustice. When many conform to the wrongs of a few, the nonconformists are viewed as the wrongdoers, while the true doers of wrong are glorified. This is an ignorance that all social hierarchies encourage and benefit from.

The perceived injustice ignorance

We are all capable of perceiving an injustice where none exists, but social hierarchies encourage or force their populations to believe injustice exists where there is none, as a way of exploiting and manipulating their populations to serve the hierarchy’s interests.

This ignorance can be used to encourage the acceptance of any wrong, from stealing to killing, for the greed of a few. Social hierarchies have a very fluid approach to justice, as they must convince their followers that a wrong is righteous when they commit it to serve their own interests, but wrong when others commit it, if it does not serve the interests of a glorified few.

This ignorance is very useful in exploiting a population that has come to value social status, as lowering and elevating human worth can make it impossible for some to be held accountable for their actions. While also aiding in the criminalisation of those who have done no wrong. This ignorance and the perceived injustice ignorance are essential tools for hierarchies in selling the just as unjust, and unjust as just, in order to mask and glorify their wrongs.

The worthy victim ignorance

This ignorance is always on display within all social hierarchies, as it’s a well-worn practice of passing responsibility for their wrongs onto their victims. Victim blaming allows those of social status to continuously practice their wrongs with little consequence.

Few of their victims are spared the constant belittling that is required to sell the wrongs of our status seekers as acceptable, not even the most viciously aggrieved. This ignorance aids our glorified wrongdoers in selling themselves as “the good guys” with their words to many of their obedient and contented slaves, even when their actions prove their maliciousness beyond doubt.

The displaced vengeance ignorance

This staple of social hierarchies is where our glorified wrongdoers encourage the victims of their many wrongs to seek vengeance for an injustice by targeting those who played little to no part in any wrongdoing. Or even create a fictitious wrong in order to distract their victims from their own very real wrongdoing. It is inevitable that this ignorance becomes commonplace within our social hierarchies’ cauldron of wrongs and lies, as they use it to target the innocent and those they wish to harm and exploit.

With our glorified wrongdoers’ practice of hiding behind others and passing blame for their acts onto anyone they can, the innocent or at least the less culpable, are always caught in this crossfire of displaced vengeance. With so many fictions and lies at their disposal within these cultures that fear the truth, or anything that would expose the absurdity of all who value their superficial elevated worth, our glorified wrongdoers can cause enough confusion and doubt to steer many of their victims away from seeking justice against them. This allows our most prolific wrongdoers to engage in their wrongs for many generations, without their victims rebelling against even the most excessive mistreatment and exploitation.

The identity ignorance

This is where we attach our self-identity to any particular fiction, lie, human trait or behaviour our masters demand, in order to be seen as their servants or property. A practice that can be encouraged within or forced upon their slaves. This belonging seeking is a part of our status-seeking, but this superficial grading of one another can fester to such an extreme that we will defend any wrongdoing committed by those we perceive to belong to the same identity. While at the same time condemn the exact same actions committed by others outwith our perceived identities. On the smallest scale, we often do this within our families, but no matter the group, we can maintain objectivity if we choose to.

Superficial identities are very useful for social hierarchies to control and divide their populations, in order to make exploiting them a much easier task. If we identify with fiction X, then we are often encouraged to look down upon those who identify with fiction Y, or any other fiction for that matter. Then there are the many fictions within a fiction that usually come with their degrees of differing worth, but regardless of any lie we may attach our identity to, we all have the same identity. When we have large social groups that are divided into many subgroups, this ignorance can be used to maintain many ignorances and injustices.

The either/or ignorance.

This is where our status seekers present those they are trying to manipulate, with only two possible options within every manufactured narrative and scenario they wish to align with their own interests. The reality of many different options, or even just a third, goes against the simplistic mindset of those of us who wish to harm others in order to elevate ourselves.

This is based on reducing and categorising others into ally or enemy, servile or non-servile, exploitable or non-exploitable, useful or hindrance…etc., in regards to getting others to serve our interests over their own. This ignorance is crucial to our glorified wrongdoers in persuading their populations to ignore the truth and value their lies and narratives. Wrongdoers need an enemy to blame their deeds on, as without one to hide behind, their wrongs are exposed for what they are.

The immortality ignorance.

Perhaps stating the obvious here, but with so many of us susceptible to the manipulation of monopolised immortality that most of our glorified wrongdoers use, it is probably worth putting this one in. This is of course, where people fail to see themselves as what they are, or as any other living thing, and are self-promoted to immortals in order to fulfil their delusions of being special, compared to other life forms and even other people. This desperate bid to deny our mortality is arguably a common human ignorance in regard to our very existence, making it ripe for exploitation.

By detaching their victims from reality enough for slaves to believe that their masters have some divine authority over their lives, rather than them having authority over their own lives, our glorified wrongdoers can dictate the level of obedience to their will, which is required from their slaves to gain the imaginary immortality that they sell, backed with extreme violence, of course. Our glorified wrongdoers try to monopolise immortality to gain the exclusive rights to sell it to their victims, and while many go along with the pretence in exchange for not being harmed or murdered, many are more than happy to value such lies, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, never mind the nature of status seekers.

Social hierarchies create their gods or adopt other popular ones of their time and place, in an attempt to justify and legitimise their control over others. Parroting their lies always comes with the promise of immortality to those willing to blindly obey them.

With the combination of appealing to the ego and fears of their believers, as well as promoting ignorances that aid the hierarchy, we get large groups of people who truly believe they are immortal and will live forever in the imaginary worlds their social hierarchies sell, as long as they do as they are told, of course. A hierarchy’s lie, or “promise” of a better life after death, works brilliantly at getting their slaves who adopt this ignorance to accept their slavery and the wrongs they endure.

This helps our glorified wrongdoers to avoid the kind of actions that many reasonable people would take in righting such wrongs or to free themselves from their oppressors. This ignorance is also very useful when trying to convince people who struggle to accept their mortality, to kill and die for the greed of their social hierarchy, as many of the more mortal among us would question actions that are largely futile (as there is little difference in having tyrant X or tyrant Y as your master) and come with such grave consequences. If many of us spent half as much time focused on the real world around us as we do on the imaginary ones that benefit the few, we would arguably be less likely to go around harming and murdering one another, just so a few can live like the gods they create.

***

Well, we’ll end the ignorances there, or we will need to be immortal to get through them all. Hopefully, we have touched on enough of them to give us an idea of the depth of deceit we must all navigate within such cultures. Many of our ignorances have similar causes and effects. We can ignore them or call them by different names, should we choose to recognise them, but they are always observable. Ignorances are, and will always be, very important to all social hierarchies, so by the simple act of not adopting them, we can face more persecution than those who do. Thus, we are never in any danger of losing our depth of ignorances under such social structures.

Social hierarchies must force, condition or encourage their populations to tolerate gross injustices and inequality, while promoting intolerance towards the mere existence of any people who do not feed their greed. Knowledge becomes something to be concealed and monopolised in order to champion so many ignorances, and should we wish to feel the wrath of any social hierarchy, all we have to do is tell the truth.

There are some of us who lack the ignorances required to harm others without just cause, but there are many who have more than enough to cause harm to even the most innocent. It is within this pool of our populations that social hierarchies find many of their enforcers, who are willing to inflict their master’s injustices upon others, void of reason or even common sense.

As an enforcer for our glorified wrongdoers, we may hold enough ignorances to believe we are serving the interests of our communities, and there may even be a small element of this that we can cling on to in order to justify the wrongs we must inflict upon our fellow human beings.

However, believing our hierarchies are what they say they are, instead of what they truly are, helps hugely in deluding ourselves into believing we are always the good guys. The ignorances, fears, greed and lack of what many call basic human decency, that is required to harm and murder those who do no wrong or cause no harm, including the most vulnerable among us, like babies, children and the elderly, is sadly more common among us than many may like to believe.

With the abundance of wrongdoers we endure, and the barrage of lies they produce, many of us have no interest in understanding the manufactured elements of our groups, and concern ourselves only with how we are personally affected by the wrongdoing that rages around us. Thus, if we are relatively unscathed, then all is good, but without understanding these elements as a society, we allow them to go unaddressed and repeated. However, this indifference to the level of depravity and human exploitation our hierarchies engage in, is exactly what our glorified wrongdoers need to ensure the continuous acceptance and even glorification of the gross wrongdoing that maintains their elevated worth.

When we understand the causes of wrongdoing and the ignorances that are required to value them, we can see the true instigators of them and have a chance to address those causes. However, few social hierarchies are going to recognise themselves as those instigators (certainly not publicly), so their cultures of greed are in little danger of achieving any kind of mass understanding about their social structures, as long as many are forced to value them.

As social hierarchies take advantage of the ignorances many suffer from, regarding their orchestrated wrongs on those who threaten their interests, many under their control will gladly ignore the vastly greater wrongs of their hierarchy, in order to demoniseand vilify their competing hierarchies, as well as individuals and subgroups within their populations.

Social hierarchies must divide their populations with an array of ignorances and lies, to convince their divided groups to believe that the causes of their oppression are on anything or anyone but the true instigators, their hierarchy. Despite the hierarchy having more control over their lives than any other group, many slaves are convinced their oppressors are whoever their true oppressors tell them it is.

If any slave population becomes united in achieving a degree of social equality, or even just knowledge about their social structure, then that population’s focus must be shifted in some way to blaming each other, or a competing hierarchy or group, for any or all of their grievances. Vilifying immigrants or a war are just a couple of popular ways to achieve this.

We are all capable of using our ignorances to justify our less than honourable behaviour and mistreatment of others. When we glorify and demonise, we abandon reality in favour of a convenient perception, and we all do this to some extent, especially when reality is not all we wish it to be. We use many fictitious concepts to avoid accepting our lack of knowledge, morality and integrity. We use such things as gods, astrology, karma and even the retrospective ignorances of fate and destiny to name but a few, but these are just ways of overlooking our lack of understanding or control, in order to convince ourselves and others that we know more than we really do, or are more than we really are.

When we start our journey through life, we all have a strong desire to understand everything and challenge all of our ignorances, and this of course, can be discouraged or encouraged by those around us. Holding onto this desire can take a big blow when we are plunged into a social hierarchy’s idea of an education system, so it is understandable why so many diminish or abandon this desire in favour of the desire to belong, so that we can achieve the acceptance of those who sell themselves as more-than.

Being aware of our own ignorances is always more important than being aware of others. If we don’t question ourselves, then we are in no position to question others. When we recognise our own ignorances, we can see them in others more easily and can even be more forgiving with this level of understanding. Many of the learned ignorances we value stem from our status-seeking, as we attempt to sell as many of them that is necessary to convince ourselves and others of our elevated worth. If we are ignorant to the ignorances we need to elevate ourselves, then we are the ones that suffer and lose much in the process, even if we are totally oblivious to the losses we suffer.

With every generation of status seekers championing the very same type of lies as those who previously benefited from their use, we get to endure them within every social hierarchy, regardless of the time and place in which we exist. The lies and ignorances that every slave generation is exposed to, run variations of the same theme, as they are always along the lines of human worth being reduced to the level of support we (as individuals or groups) have for our hierarchy. The clapping hands and nodding heads of our status seekers sycophants, are always worth more than any inquisitive minds or righteous acts of the less self-absorbed, to any social hierarchy.

We all value lies (some more than others), so just recognising the lies we ourselves have come to value can be a challenging task. Breaking our conditioning or questioning the ignorances we have adopted can be a difficult process. Especially if we value the ignorance of differing worth or have interwoven lies onto our own perceived identity.

The identity crisis is possible in those of us who have attached our identity to fictions and lies. If we come to the realization that the fictions and lies we value are not worth the value we give them, then we may question our own value, as we must alter our identity to break free from the fiction or lie we now understand to be just that. Hierarchal cultures obviously hate to be questioned, as it risks exposing the lies they are built upon, but they can maintain their lies and ignorances by using many different methods, and whether we choose to believe them or challenge them, we are all exposed to them.

Chapter 3

Language – The Power of Lies

All living things communicate, and whether it’s physical, chemical, symbols or sounds, it shows how important communication is for all life. We use all of these things to interact with one another, and can use them as a marker for belonging within our groups. Sound is one of the most common ways we communicate, but the way we think in the languages we know begs the question of what did we use to think in before we had spoken language? No doubt our instincts, senses and gut feelings would have been utilized far more often before we possessed a series of sounds to indicate specific things.

If we imagine a time when we did not have spoken language to communicate with one another, or at least nothing beyond a few sounds, we could argue our thinking would have been limited without the ability to think in a language that had a degree of definition to it.

Perhaps individually, we could have had some sort of unique individual language in our minds to aid our thinking ability, which eventually led to us sharing our inner language with those around us to create the spoken languages that we all use to think in today. It may sound much like the chicken or egg thing (although clearly the egg came first). By using our inner language to think in first, our spoken language is just our sharing of that inner language. A practice we are arguably still trying to master.

Our sounds and symbols can be great tools, but as they can morph into any meaning we choose, it allows miscommunication amongst ourselves to become common. There are thousands of different languages spoken by people every day on the lump of rock we call home, with most of them found in the tropics, but that’s a whole other book. The ability to use sounds and symbols in order to share anything from the simple to the complex in a definitive way, is a true wonder that can go unappreciated within cultures that allow their language to be controlled and restricted by a small group of glorified wrongdoers.

Therefore, this joyous wonder succumbs to the practice of bastardisation that our social hierarchies are so fond of. With not even the languages we use escaping the control of our social hierarchies, or their need to glorify and belittle (as they declare their own sounds superior to that of others), few of our languages get to develop at a rate or to the degree we are capable of. Instead, many languages only survive until one empire of hate dies, and the next empire of hate thrives.

The languages used by our glorified wrongdoers tend to become the dominant language that their slaves are expected to use. Those who do not speak what hierarchies tend to call “the proper way of speaking” are deemed to be inferior in some way and more deserving of having wrongs inflicted upon them. If we take any one of our languages, we will find that among those who speak the same language, many use the same words but attach different meanings to them.

The same words spoken over many generations can have very different meanings over time, and the jargon within different trades or fields can give the same words many more different meanings. Thus, misunderstandings are very common among those who speak the same language, so imagine how prevalent they are among those who speak a different language. In many ways, misunderstanding is the most common language we have, as we all have our own ways of communicating. Although in saying that, the language of lies is probably the most common language within our social hierarchies.

Simple misunderstandings can have grave consequences. Even after millions of years, and with all of our advanced tools, humans are still suffering from communication problems. Although this is obviously exaggerated by our status seekers’ need to proliferate their lies. We could argue that the impact social hierarchies have on languages is rarely positive, as they constrain it, abuse it, glorify it, demoniseit, manipulate it, and even outlaw it to serve their own interests.

Imagine being told the language you speak is against a small group of rich men’s laws, and is somehow less than the language that some particular small group of people uses. Well, for many, there is no need to imagine, as this form of oppression is common among social hierarchies. As even the sounds we make don’t escape the persecution of our glorified wrongdoers’ practices, many have been murdered simply because they did not use the same sounds as their oppressors, and many more will no doubt face the same fate. As social hierarchies strive to monopolise language in all its forms, every manner of wrong has been inflicted upon people who did no wrong, other than use a language that differed from that of their glorified wrongdoers.

Slaves are always forced to talk in their master’s tongue. The need for our modern social hierarchies to control the languages used by their slave populations, is even more important in the debt slavery system than it was in the traditional slavery system, as debt slavery relies heavily on our wrongdoers’ legal system’s idea of consent. This form of “consent” is just a more subtle form of force, which uses the manipulation of words and codes that masquerade as laws to reach any outcome they wish.

In today’s modern world, where technology has seen our population’s ability to communicate with one another skyrocket like never before, our hierarchies are doing what they always do in trying to control how we communicate. Our new-found ability to communicate is a great threat to every social hierarchy on the planet, as the lies they rely on to maintain their control over their populations have never been in this much danger of being so easily exposed. Although, as we have likely never had such a level of obedient slaves as we do today, it is perhaps not that great a risk.

One of the tried and tested tactics of language control used by our hierarchies is to convince their populations that they should be offended by words, as well as restrict free speech. So many adopt this ignorance and demand it be controlled by... Yep! You’ve guessed it, their glorious wrongdoers. So when someone is persecuted and thrown in prison for months just for stringing a few words together, many have been conditioned to believe it is just.

No doubt many will continue to hold such a view right up until the words they use result in them being put in prison, or worse, simply for not complying with their hierarchy’s preferred phrasings. It requires a great many ignorances to value such persecution of those who have done no wrong, while glorifying all the very real wrongs raging around us that are committed by our glorified wrongdoers (who are exempt from accountability), but this is the ignorant environments our social hierarchies produce.

Social hierarchies have always persecuted those who have done no wrong and always will, but with their slave population’s new ability to communicate with each other, controlling who is or is not allowed a public platform becomes crucial for them. It becomes necessary for our habitual liars to control what is said on our publicly accessible platforms in order to minimise any truths about any hierarchy’s wrongdoings becoming public knowledge. As modern technology allows many to directly challenge their social hierarchy’s lying industries, propaganda and dogma, this could influence many of their slave populations to go from a potentially contented population to a discontented one. A fear all social hierarchies suffer from.

Free to Hate or Hate the Free

Free speech is always a hilarious subject within our social hierarchies. Many hierarchies try to convince anyone who is blind to reality that they value the concept of free speech, even while at the same time they are belittling, suppressing, attacking, imprisoning, starving, torturing and murdering those who attempt to exercise this freedom by voicing truths about their hierarchy. Within our cultures of greed, free speech is just like any other right, in that it exists for those who are deemed worthy enough to use it.

Their versions of freedom of speech are limited to those who never veer from their hierarchy’s narratives or interests. Just like their versions of “free trade” or a “free press”. By putting the word free in front of something is a practice used to manipulate the more suggestible among us. This control and oppression of language, and thus the truth, allows our glorified wrongdoers to glorify their wrongdoing, while demonising and criminalising rightdoers who threaten to expose the mass wrongs that their elevated worth is built upon.

What many hierarchies now call “hate speech” is sold as a crime that is worthy of imprisonment, as well as an excuse to steal from people. Real wrongdoing that causes harm can go unpunished, yet a few words are somehow worse than being assaulted, raped or even murdered in the minds of the idiots and manipulators that value such nonsense. If it is wrong to hate, then it must also be wrong to love, as we can use both to commit any wrong, but we can also use both to commit any right. If someone hates rape and murder, then stopping a rapist or murderer would be a crime to our deluded status seekers (granted, within our cultures that glorify our rapists and murderers, this may be a bad example).

Telling slaves that they are not free to hate their masters’ wrongs is all rather ridiculous (especially among slaves who have been conditioned to believe they are free), but consistent with the mentality of glorified wrongdoers. If hating wrongdoers is acceptable, then it should be fine to hate all social hierarchies, but even hate becomes monopolised within such cultures. This is of course, just an excuse to stifle or remove any opposition to a hierarchy’s dogma by branding those who do not repeat their lies as somehow hateful. This is a hilarious concept in itself as all social hierarchies live on hate, constantly trying to inflict it upon their populations, enemies, supporters and collaborators.

We can barely get through a day without social hierarchies and their minions spewing their own hate speech to belittle others in order to elevate themselves. But anyone offended by the language of malicious intent used by any social hierarchy and their minions, should not hold their breath if they expect their hierarchy’s enforcers to respond in the same way they would to a less-than’s truthful words. As hierarchies (in their deluded minds) get to decide who is deserving of hate and who is not, based on who feeds their greed and who does not, “hate speech” is only activated largely when someone who feeds their greed is offended by someone who does not.

This fashionable term of hate speech is used to censor anyone who voices any inconvenient truth, while those who point the finger of hate speech at others are more often than not themselves mired in hate that enters their own speech. So the truth is discarded in favour of picking sides, which are in effect either with or against the hierarchy. The hypocrisy of status-based hate may be lost on those who value such nonsense, but many are well aware of such attempts to control narratives and promote lies.

As all social hierarchies are built on hate, they constantly sell their hate as something of moral value when they aim it at those they wish to exploit. This projecting of their own malice and shortcomings onto others is a standard type of behaviour among status seekers. Our social hierarchies make a habit of blaming their wrongs on their victims and then accusing them of doing what they do. When hate is justifiably aimed at our glorified wrongdoers for the endless wrongs they inflict upon others, hate itself suddenly becomes a force for evil. It is apparently OK to hate our hierarchy’s less-thans or enemies (no reason required), but to hate the wrongs committed by a hierarchy is redefined as an act of hate.

The practice of spreading nonsense and coercing others to repeat it, or face social condemnation from those willing to lie in order to gain or maintain elevated worth, is not new. One of our many modern lies that many are willing to partake in is the invention of endless genders. Part of this lie is the even more ridiculous lies that males can give birth and menstruate like females. The value of these lies for our glorified wrongdoers is multiple. They of course, act as a distraction for their slaves’ attention to be on anything other than the endless wrongdoings their masters are engaged in, as well as being used to weed out anyone with any integrity from their elevated positions, leaving only those willing to pretend (or even believe) that males and females have suddenly become mere perceptions, in the hope of being awarded elevated worth.

With only the weaker and more servile minds that are too scared to speak an obvious truth left in positions of influence and power, our glorified wrongdoers ensure there is little to no resistance (or even objections) from those selected for influential positions, thus securing total obedience to their will. If we possess a degree of integrity and find ourselves in a position of influence, we should expect to be bombarded by the manufactured abuse, offence and hate our hierarchy’s minions and flatterers obediently engage in.

With the endless lies being valued by so many within our cultures of deceit, the truth will often offend those who value those lies, especially if they have been convinced to attach their personal identity to them or gain from them. Social hierarchies profit so much from simply demonising and glorifying language that it will always be a well-worn practice for them.

The Eternally Offended Status Seeker

There are many reasons we take genuine offence at a few words, but even if those words are malicious, hateful, aggressive and intended to harm, the offence still must take place within the mind of the offended. One of the reasons many of us are easily offended is because we have little control over ourselves. The more control we have over ourselves, and the greater understanding we have of ourselves and those around us, the less likely we are to be offended by a few sounds.

Within our cultures of differing worth, offence is used as a tool to be used whenever an inconvenient truth threatens our elevated worth or our lies. We see this when status seekers exaggerate their offence (that is always absent when their hierarchy commits very real offences) as a way of displaying their fake moral superiority. Often vilifying any so-called offender in an attempt to lower their status and display some kind of morality gap between them.

As habitual liars tend to expose themselves, the whole superficial process is revealed when they use language to condemn the very same acts they glorify, depending on the status of the individuals or groups involved. Within all social hierarchies, those of high social status are almost always offended by the truth, as the truth is always an attack on the lies their social status is built upon. Thus, they are among the easiest people on the planet to offend, because anything other than how wonderful they are goes against the self-glorifying practices status seekers prefer to mire their existence in. This is why our social hierarchies always surround themselves with an overabundance of fawners and flatterers.

Just as an abusive individual can use language to justify their wrongs to their victims, our organised groups of glorified wrongdoers do exactly the same thing. Language, like any tool, is wielded by the intent of its users, so we get our wrongdoers forever playing with words to avoid even speaking the truth, never mind recognising it. This nonsense leads to many arguing over the definitions and the etymology of words, which is just a disagreeing of meaning that can be used in order to maintain a manipulation, and one thing all social hierarchies do in abundance is manipulate.

This need for social hierarchies to constantly create differing definitions to make their manipulations succeed, is a huge barrier in any language’s ability to evolve past the effects of a parallel language that undermines itself. Speaking plainly is rare for status seekers at the best of times, but when their status relies on trying to manipulate with words, the beauty of language becomes redundant. Of course, many trades use the same common words with very different meanings, but when a trade inflicts their meanings onto the public, as those in the laws and codes industries do, then the definitions of words becomes a tool for exploitation in the hands of those with intent to exploit.

Doublespeak that is used to deceive and mislead is a language all social hierarchies use, as it helps to avoid accountability, evade explanation and limit the truth. As social hierarchies and their servants engage in doublespeak (or their parallel language) in order to exploit others, it becomes almost impossible for these glorified liars to speak plainly. The closest many ever get to speaking in anything akin to an honest way is when they expose their true malice when they conspire with their fellow wrongdoers.

Wherever there is doublespeak, there is usually a profitable exploitation afoot. More often than not, the truth is a lie, and a lie is the truth, when it comes from the mouths of those with elevated worth. Social hierarchies and their minions are trained to use misleading language that helps them speak endlessly, and yet say nothing, in order to avoid recognition or accountability for their wrongdoings. Language will always be bastardised by social hierarchies because of their exploitative nature, so no matter how much we develop our words, terms and languages, they will always be altered in some way to allow a misled population to be exploited.

Another influence social hierarchies have on our languages is of course, from their need to glorify and demonise. Social hierarchies, by their nature, must censor the world around them from those they control, in order to maintain their grip on that control. So they create the nonsense of good and bad language in an attempt to elevate themselves above others. There is no such thing as good or bad language, there is just language. Just like there is no good or bad weather, there is just weather.

Anyone could categorise anything as good or bad from their own narrow perspective, but the objective mind is not so easily fooled by its own desires. So even words are put into a class system in an attempt to distinguish between those who think they are more-than, and those they wish to proclaim as less-than.

Swearing or cussing is something everyone in every language does, but so many are convinced it is bad (socially, at least), as in doing so, they can gain social acceptance within a group that suffers from human grading. If we are being told from an early age by all around us that some words are bad, then it may be no surprise that many come to believe this. So we end up with a population of hypocrites, being oh so offended by biologically related words they themselves use.

All swearing is related to our biology (predominantly in the pelvic region), and as many of us within our social hierarchy are mired in the ignorance of differing worth, we really don’t like to be seen as just another animal, or even an ordinary human.

Hierarchies have to sell themselves as more worthy or deserving than their slaves, so by staying clear of words that remind their slaves that they are just the same biologically, we get this ridiculous attempt to keep our biological vocabulary under control by belittling all who use it. We end up with status seekers who want to climb these social ladders, having to imitate those who have more wealth and status, by speaking the way they speak, and not using the words they have declared as bad.

As status seekers, we have to do all we can to be as similar to the hierarchy as possible, which results in us talking, walking, dressing, thinking, hating and glorifying the same way our masters do. As well as desperately trying to mimic our hierarchy’s definitions of more-than, in order to gain some kind of belonging or acceptance from those with more status.

This makes status seekers use of language especially vulnerable to adopting the ignorances of their hierarchy. By engaging in this comical mimicry, individuals can raise their social status, but as social hierarchies are predominantly old males, being born female can render the most diligent mimicry useless, as can being a different colour or race from the hierarchy. If we don’t look like our hierarchies do, then all the mimicry in the world can prove ineffective at gaining status within their glorified groups.

Offended By Biology

Swearing is a wonderful thing, and there is good reason why everyone does it. We could argue that swearing is the oldest form of language, as after all, our biological functions came about long before we did. Most of our language takes place in the newer cortex part of the brain, whereas swearing stems from the older mammalian or limbic part of the brain.

This more primal language has many uses, as it helps us cope with pain, it can improve our strength and endurance, it can be a great emotion release, and it can help us communicate a depth of feeling in a faster time by using fewer words than non-biologically related words can. It can even be a sign of honesty, as swearing is usually instinctive and emotional.

Swearing in itself is not bad, but when used to verbally abuse, then of course the verbal abuse can be bad, but we can verbally abuse without swearing and just using words that don’t fall into our pretender’s category of bad language. Like anything we use, it is not the thing we use that is good or bad, it is the intent of the user.

We can swear on a regular basis without a hint of bad intent, but in the minds of those conditioned to believe in good and bad language, ill intent can always be manufactured or misinterpreted, and it is here that many may find offence. As offence lives only in the minds of those who give it a home, the unoffendables often don’t seek social status that much, and they tend to be a more understanding bunch than those who seek out offence at every opportunity as a way of identifying with their fellow status seekers.

Those of us who find offence so easily tend to suffer from many of the more-than less-than ignorances. If we see ourselves as more-than, we can attach the language of our social hierarchy to some kind of superiority, which we can use to delude ourselves into believing we are somehow more moral, more intelligent or more whatever we want.

Swearing has a scale that incites varying levels of offence within the offended. The words we declare offence at can vary greatly from culture to culture, depending on their hierarchy’s fetish for a particular body part or biological act that they wish to vilify. Most parents within these cultures of nonsense condition their children to believe in bad words, mostly because they don’t want their children to lose status or to be looked down upon by others who value the same ignorance. As a result, we get whole populations of hypocrites that swear, but still engage in their social offence game.

Biological words are not the only words that are demoted to the realm of offensive within our cultures of social status. Non-biologically related words that are deemed to have become derogatory in nature over a period of time can incite offence in those seeking status. There is a constant cycle where words that are used to belittle others over generations become unacceptable and are replaced with more palatable words.

However, as social hierarchies must belittle and bully others in order to exist, it is only a matter of time before the newer, more acceptable words are used to belittle others with, and so become offensive to the newer generation being belittled by the new words. The never-ending cycle of offensive words all comes down to the fact that in our abusive cultures of greed, we will never cease to use language to abuse the slave classes into accepting their servitude to the few. This is just one of the many consequences of valuing the ignorance of differing worth.

Swearing is a great way of cutting through the nonsense that many status seekers value, so it is no surprise that it is frowned upon by hierarchies, as it can easily belittle the nonsenses their perceived elevated worth is based upon. Swearing is more acceptable between those unaffected by differing worth or those of equal status, or at least those who see themselves as equal. When we accept each other as equals, we have less need to engage in the pretence of our good and bad language nonsense.

Status seekers do all they can to keep “bad language” from them when in the presence of those they believe to be less-than. This results in repetitive practices such as declaring swearing to be a sign of low intelligence, showing a lack of vocabulary, or appearing uncivilised and any other such nonsense, in an attempt to convince others to value the ignorance and use it to prove their elevated worth, even though they themselves swear. However, no matter how much swearing is vilified by our glorified hypocrites, swearing is part of us all, and it is not going away any time soon.

Our hierarchies are always engaged with promoting the idea that everyone who is anyone (status seekers), should be offended at anything and everything their hierarchy finds offensive. Thus, anyone who values equality or justice, for example, will always be offensive to them. In today’s fledgling tech-driven world, our belongers and status seekers are bombarded with their hierarchy’s targets of offence, while few are encouraged to be offended by the wrongdoings of their hierarchy. By controlling what their slaves are offended by, when a truth leaks out into the public consciousness, any truth or the messenger of any truth can be immediately denied or belittled by the army of professional liars and offence takers, who are paid to champion their glorified wrongdoers’ lies.

Our masters’ desire to control the words of their slaves is nothing new, but in a time when our oppressed populations have modern technology to communicate with one another, it makes sense for our glorified wrongdoers to go to extreme lengths to prevent these technologies from threatening their lavish lifestyles. Hence why we get people going to prison for a comment, while rapists and murderers are sold as heroes.

As every lie our hierarchies tell now comes with a greater risk of being exposed, creating a culture that is offended by everything can be very useful in prolonging the life of each lie, and shortening the exposure to any truth. With many who have been wronged by their hierarchy able to voice those wrongs to a larger audience than ever before, the wronged can unite together against their glorified wrongdoers as a more powerful group than as an individual. Meaning every hierarchy must exert their control over their slave’s ability to communicate freely.

Worse still, the oppressed could use their newfound ability to communicate and find that we are all not as different as our hierarchies try to make us out to be. Knowing knowledge and understanding can be shared and encouraged in a way that aids their populations, instead of being used to exploit and manipulate them, could turn their contented oppressed into the discontented oppressed. Even worse than any of that, the oppressed could start to organise themselves like never before to recognise and address the wrongs and the prolific wrongdoers within their cultures.

It is for these reasons, amongst others, that we are seeing people being sent to prison for months, just because they shared some words that their hierarchy has deemed offensive. Now, there will always be those who see no issue with this, but for the less ignorant, the idea of putting people who have committed no wrong or harmed no one into prison, while we have gross wrongdoers who actually do consistently harm people while being immune to any consequence for their actions, is beyond offensive.

Saying the wrong words is never a justification for wrongdoers to harm others. However, as wrongdoers, we will harm others for no other reason than to appear more than them, so we are often looking for anything that we can use to justify our wronging, and a word or two is more than enough when we are ignorant enough.

Spoken language can be a thing of beauty, as it is a wonderful way for us to share something or express ourselves in great detail, allowing us to pass on knowledge from one generation to the next. Written language can be even more valuable in this task, as it can transcend time more effectively in order to pass on knowledge over many generations, well after those who attained the knowledge are long gone.

This ability to communicate with future generations means we can save a lot of our own time by acquiring knowledge others have already discovered or mastered, instead of spending our time discovering it for ourselves, as no one lifetime is long enough to acquire all the knowledge we may seek.

These gifts from our ancestors can allow us to advance in so many fields at a rate that we never would without them. However, as wonderful as language can be when used as a positive tool to advance our knowledge, it can be just as negative when information is inaccurate or just plain lies, to become a destructive force. This is essential to bear in mind with any information we ever come across, no matter who is passing it on.

It is wise not to believe the words of anyone or indeed anything in this or any other book, until we have given it enough thought, verified it for ourselves or have at least considered the possibility of it fitting into all we know to be true. Although that leaves us dependent on the accuracy of what we define as true, so easier said than done, but this is where our instinct can be of great use.

When we receive a new piece of information, we often instinctively have a feel for whether it is true or not, based upon the level of knowledge and ignorances we already possess. If it fits into all the knowledge we already possess, then we side with the truth, if not, then we side with a lie. But if our knowledge is not wide enough, or we have too many ignorances or beliefs, then our instincts may not be as effective as we would like.

So we have to try and judge for ourselves if the information we receive from others, or those who came before us, is wisdom from years of experience and toil, or just a load of lies made up for the benefit of those who use them. A task some are better at than others, but if we have always practiced the art of judging for ourselves, rather than allowing others to do the judging for us, we will avoid many of the manipulations we encounter.

Just like swearing, we all lie (some more than others). Why do we lie? Well, lies can get us many things that truths could deny us. They can elevate our worth to a group or individuals in order to gain status, positions, friends, lovers, wealth, jobs…etc. Basically, anything we desire. Sounds good, eh! Maybe we should be asking why everyone doesn’t just lie all of the time (those of us who are not status seekers that is).

Well, a whole population of bankers, politicians, lawyers and propagandists (hierarchal journalists, enforcers and teachers) would be a very unproductive one. They would starve off while blaming and suing one another for a lack of food, so maybe not a bad idea after all. When it comes to lies, our pesky status seekers have a lot to answer for.

As all social hierarchies are built and maintained on lies, and constantly at war with the truth, they supply their slaves with a constant conveyor belt of lies with their daily dose of doom from their propaganda practitioners that call themselves politicians, teachers, journalists or experts of some kind, in order to keep their slaves fearful of anything other than slavery. It is no wonder then that lies are so prevalent to those living in such groups, and why most come to value so many of them.

We are by no means the only living thing that lies. Many other life forms also understand the benefits of deceit, but just as we have become very good at lying, we have also become very good at spotting a lie and its liars (again, some more than others). Of course, a lie can be a good thing. It can be kind, helpful, selfless, brave and even noble, but more often than not, they are selfish, manipulative, harmful, cruel, cowardly, and even fatal. The intent of the user determines if a lie is of good intent or bad intent (in the users mind, at least), but the majority of lies we use are to serve the interests of the users.

Etymology That Reveals

Speaking of users, our social hierarchies’ role in how our languages develop and interconnect can be seen in the most common words we use. For example, if we look at the English language, in the past, the people who called themselves the upper class (more-thans) were more French-influenced, whereas the people the upper class called the lower class (less-thans) were more Germanic in their influence.

This merging can be seen in the animals we eat. As the so-called lower classes did most of the hard graft by working with the animals, the words for animals are Germanic related. Whereas the so-called upper classes were the ones doing most of the eating, the names of the meat of the animals they ate were French in origin.

To this day, the merging of these names have stuck, so the Germanic/French words we use are cow/beef, sheep/mutton, deer/venison and pig/pork, for example. Although when it comes to chicken/poultry, we maintain the same word for the animal and the meat, but this may be due to the French word of poultry covering many different types of birds like turkey, duck, swan, pheasant, quail…etc., so all birds and their meat maintain the same word.

With the interconnectivity of language, there are words that have two or more words in them that define the very meaning in the word itself. There is a real, simplistic beauty to these words. It is as if those who first spoke these words were completely free of the nonsense that infect so many, and just condensed something they wished to describe with one word. We can argue that language itself has its roots in this simplistic descriptive nature before it was distorted into tools for the deceitful, and many languages display these type of words.

These words tell us all we need to know about their true meaning rather than their later official definition. For example: - History - a record of the past, simply put is his story, not our story or her story, or even the story. Theological - relating to the study of the nature of Gods and religious beliefs, but simply put, is the illogical with a vowel change and a double L to define the word as being opposed to the logical. Malevolent – wishing evil or harm on others, simply put, is male violent with the removal of a vowel, pretty much sums up the word. Nescience – meaning to not know or be unaware, simply put, as no science with another vowel change sums up the word’s meaning.

Although not a multi-word with a definitive meaning, evil is interestingly live backwards, and as evil describes the acts we commit that interfere with others’ desire to live, they appear to be purposely connected. Just like kin with a d describes how we should treat kin, though we should perhaps be kind to all, as we are all kin. Anyway, as interesting as our words connectedness may be, we can be sure that many, if not most, of the words we hear within our master/slave cultures will be used to form and support lies.

Many people and groups like to be lied to, as what status seeker or vain mind does not like to hear how more-than they are in comparison to others? We lie to ourselves to mask our ignorances, to protect our ego and to give us confidence, and like swearing, lies can help us cope with pain or give us strength and endurance. Some despise all forms of lies, while others lie so much that they don’t know where their lies end and the truth begins.

In almost every social gathering, people are lying to each other constantly, even if they are only regarded as small lies, they are still lies. It is as if we are all aware (on some level) of the truths about our evil cultures that rely so heavily on wrongdoing and human exploitation. But as they are so awful and unjust, we can’t be honest with ourselves or one another, as we fear the truth could lead to us being ostracised from our fragile superficial groups that revere so many lies.

So we tell ourselves and others, what we like to rebrand as polite lies, to keep up appearances and maintain the ignorances we have come to value. We use an endless procession of words to avoid confronting the truth. Lies need to be repeated in order to exist, but as the existence of the truth needs no words, it is always lingering, even in groups of prolific liars. When we understand ourselves, we have less need to lie to ourselves, this can allow us to be comfortable with the truth. However, should we value the ignorance of differing worth, we can struggle to be comfortable with many truths.

Some of our languages even put their idea of feminine and masculine characteristics onto words, for things that are as far removed from anything needing to be related to sex. So perhaps this says more about the profound way cultures assign specific roles to males and females, to the point that they do this even with words and objects. Then there is the language police. Those people who believe the language they use must be used one way and only one way, which is of course, always the way they use it.

This book will have them pulling their hair out, as there are words like belongers, unoffendables, rightdoers and a few others we will try and throw in just to keep them happy in their disdain. Now of course, there are good reasons to try and have everyone understand the same system for the spoken and written words we use to help avoid misunderstandings. However, misunderstandings in language are hugely profitable for hierarchies and those who deal in deceit, so they will always remain to some degree as long as we value exploiting one another over valuing each other.

Language is unstructured, or at least very fluid in comparison to mathematics. The beauty of maths is its natural, multifaceted, incorruptible structure. Maths is everywhere, as it is part of nature and is largely something we discover, rather than invent, with our only creative input being the symbols and words we use to recognise it. The language of mathematics is formed in a set way that is predictable and unchanging over time, so it is extremely reliable (unlike our hierarchies’ languages) and can allow us to be even more precise in how we communicate with one another.

Mathematics is arguably the purest form of language as it is consistent and unambiguous, so it is perhaps for this very reason that maths is so poorly taught to slaves within our social hierarchies, beyond the basic understanding of knowing the meaning of how much their masters demand from them.

In its most basic form, as 1 + 1 always equal 2, it avoids the deceit that our status seekers infect all other forms of subjects using language. Our glorified liars will find it difficult to sell the lie that 1 + 1 = 3, no matter how much any 1 claims to be special or twice as worthy as any other 1. This is a hard sell to even the most gullible among us. The idea that a 1 is a bad or low-status 1, and another 1 is a good or high-status 1 that is more-than the worth of the other, is just as ridiculous within maths as it is in human groups. Yet many only see it in maths.

The pure equality of maths goes against the ignorance of differing worth that all social hierarchies value. When it comes to maths, every 1 is equal, so not a great symbolic field for status seekers to teach those they wish to grade as less-than. Maths, like the truth, is all around us, whether we see it or not. We can use the beauty of its simplicity to help us understand nature and even our own behavioural patterns that are equally consistent. The truth is very similar to mathematics in that it has structure. They both have consistent and predictable forms and an almost infinite abundance of connections.

The structure of truth has a connection to each and every other truth, but as we throw our lies over so many truths, we often struggle to recognise its structure in favour of celebrating our own ignorances. Thus, the 1+1 of truth can be whatever we want it to be when we are illiterate in the language of truth. This makes it challenging to share the truth with those who have been conditioned to avoid, ignore and hate it.

Our language of lies has little to no structure, so it is never far from alterations or collapse. As soon as our liars are gone, their lies go with them, while the truth endures forever. Status seekers and their hierarchies must always mask the structure of truth from those they wish to exploit, but by denying truths that would expose our lies, we also limit our ability to understand the connections that make up the structure of the truth and the realities around us. Unlike mathematics, language is constantly changing and very corruptible, so every generation uses different words from the previous one.

If we look at the forever-changing language around sex for example, we could argue this has evolved as a way for young adults to use different words as a kind of code to distinguish themselves from older adults, to ensure any offspring have a better chance of their parents surviving throughout their childhood. The beauty of language is that there are no limitations on it, so is constantly evolving, as we can all make up words to suit our needs.

Language always trails behind our understanding, so as our understanding grows, we need more language to define our new knowledge, in order to communicate that knowledge to others. Imagine all the thoughts and things that have yet to become thoughts or things. An endless array of words just waiting to be created, and that’s just in one language.

It is easy to understand the importance of a structured language for any group, as it aids in accurate communication. However, as lies and deceit are the norm within our cultures of differing worth, accurate communication is largely redundant within such cultures and only really useful for ensuring our master’s minions carry out the orders they are told to. The idea of a complete language where everything has a word or words to define it completely, will no doubt forever remain just an idea when deceit is so highly valued, but a language that is spoken by everyone on the planet is a more attainable goal, with perhaps a mixing of languages. After all, every language is just a mix of other languages.

However, as social hierarchies celebrate divisions, getting just a few different speaking populations to use one language under such social structures, is almost impossible without the glorious use of force, as is the common method of sharing a language among our cultures of hate.

So a more realistic goal could be to have a global second language that all can use to communicate effectively with, kind of what happens when the most prolific wrongdoers impose their will on the rest of the world’s hierarchies. Although, who needs sound? A universal sign language may avoid the glorification of any one group’s sounds over another, but even here, one group’s signs would no doubt be elevated above others.

Volume Control

As wonderful as words can be, silence can say more than all the words in the world. We don’t need to know words that describe something we all feel, as feeling is understood by the mind, and as our minds are similar, the sharing of sounds can be rendered redundant by a sharing of feeling or knowing when our minds share the same level of understanding.

We can often give our words too much value, especially within cultures of status where many try to win conversations and therefore status, rather than just having a conversation. The way our status seekers set up their conversations in order to declare a “winner” of some kind is always worth a giggle, although it can be somewhat sickening without detachment when witnessing their choreographed “debates” that glorify their wrongdoing.

Our social hierarchies lying industries are all guilty of manipulating language, but their pseudo-justice system have to be the worst culprits, as their own definitions of words that have different definitions on the same words used commonly within their populations, are used to aid exploitation, as well as allowing our deluded wrongdoers to feel intellectually superior.

Winning is always more important to hierarchal justice than justice, thus, this is the measuring stick of worth, not just within this industry, but the whole of these societies. With an excessive amount of value being put upon the perceived victories and defeats that are forever in the minds of those around us, it can be a challenge to share in the true nature of anything. We could argue that when we conquer the self, there are no victories or defeats, as they are the same thing.

When we have the most status within a hierarchal group, most will lie to us, and when we have the least status, most will lie to themselves. By getting caught up in differing definitions of words and glorifying the definitions of those with more status over those with less, the speaker often tries to mask their ill intent behind such practices. Words can incite extreme violence within cultures of differing worth, as status seekers can be desperate to defend the lies that give them elevated worth, or find offence in words that expose a lie they have attached their personal identity to.

Exposing lies, especially in a group setting where there is an audience measuring the social status of those around them, can be a dangerous activity when surrounded by such fragile minds and even more fragile egos. Mocking a lie is often interpreted by the liar as mocking the liar, especially if the liar has come to attach their wealth, status or identity to the lie. With status seekers drawn to positions of influence and authority, it is never wise to expect honesty from those who are paid to engage with us.

With our status seekers’ ridiculous behaviours and claims, they invite being mocked. It is only because of their overactive malice and habit of hiding safely behind their more obedient slaves (who are all too willing to obey when ordered to harm those that mock their masters), that limits the flow of mockery that they deserve. Humour is a very basic behaviour we all use, especially when we are very young and somewhat free from the ignorances and malice that is valued by adults, who have often lost much of theirs in the pursuit of wealth and status. This fundamental joy can take many forms, as it is so crucial to us.

Even within suffering and tragedy, we have a need for humour. We can sometimes struggle to see beyond ourselves and wallow in our pain, but with our humour, we can remove ourselves from our suffering, even if it is for just a moment, as it is much easier to endure anything with humour than without it.

Mocking and belittling in themselves are not bad or harmful activities, it all comes down to the intent of the user. Mocking and belittling among family members or close friends often comes from a place of benevolence, even an act of love that is designed to ensure those they care about don’t succumb to a deluded perception of themselves. However, as our status seekers are overflowing with malice, they often use it as an act of hate.

Within the cauldron of wrongdoing where all social hierarchies live, humour becomes something to fear for our status seekers, as humour is always a great tool to expose the lies and boasts of the more pretentious among us. Status seekers are never too fond of humour that exposes the lies that their elevated worth is attached to. Humour never takes the nonsense of social status seriously, as it cannot be threatened, harmed or killed in the same way that those who share it can be. Social hierarchies always try to control the language of humour with the age-old practice of offence, but making fun of their many ridiculous lies and colossal hypocrisies is irresistible to those not drowning in their masters’ ignorances. Even if sharing such jokes about our glorified murderers comes with its obvious risks.

Perhaps we will reach a point where the word “no” becomes taboo, as our rapists find it too offensive. Manipulating people to become more offended at words than actions will always aid our glorified wrongdoers in their wrongdoing, as any social group that fails to address their status seekers’ wrongs only encourages more and more wrongdoing. Cultures steered by status seekers tend to develop what they like to call a “polite society”, which avoids addressing the truths of their deeds at all costs. As those who are deemed worthy of being part of these polite societies consist mainly of their glorified wrongdoers and their cheerleaders, there is little danger of many of these status seekers publicly voicing a truth that would endanger their elevated status within their group.

This manipulation of language makes it rude, or not polite enough, to address lies or the endless hypocrisy of all the status seekers involved within such superficial groups. Pretenders pretending to value the pretence of their fellow pretenders’ pretences is always overly pretentious and rarely worth our time.

Language that gets to the point is sold as brash, vulgar or uncouth, as it risks easily exposing the lies our status seekers sell, hence why all social hierarchies develop their language of deceit by dressing up their avoidance of the truth as something above the true beauty of language in defining something accurately. The more lies we value, the more we can be offended by the truth, therefore the easily offended are easily manipulated. Excessive politeness encourages many to avoid the truth in fear of offending liars and idiots, thus the fear of offending induces a fear of the truth.

Another hilarious common practice used by our status seekers is the unnecessary increase in volume. Many of us often partake in the practice of using volume in a bid to emphasise something, but many of us use it to elevate our status, as if our level of status equates to the level of volume in the sounds we make. Many within hierarchies, and their enforcers, are encouraged to use volume as a way of displaying their deluded elevated worth. Those of us who wield control over others or are adorned with the power of unaccountable violence can often wallow in this tone assault. As these practices tend to be more of a male pastime, there is the comical more-than male tone that often enters the voices of those trying to have their delusions of superiority recognised by others.

The unnatural forced tone within the sound of language that many status seekers use, in an attempt to give their lies more validity, or to appear more-than in their own minds or in the minds of others within earshot, is always worth a chuckle. But of course, even something as ridiculous as increased volume or a rehearsed superficial tone is taken very seriously by many, as are all things that are backed with a monopoly on violence. As long as we elevate the worth of a few over the many, words will often have their value determined by the status of the speaker, over the accuracy, content or meaning of the words themselves.

Simon Says

Before we end our chapter on language, let us touch briefly on our physical language or body language. As it is equally hilarious. As status seekers, we do like to be physically elevated above those we wish to pretend are less-than ourselves. This behaviour has the obvious representation of differing forms of worth, but perhaps there is also partly a more ancient psychology going on. As we evolved from living high in trees, we tend to feel safer when looking down on our environment, and as we must wrong many to gain elevated worth, perhaps there is a part of us that feels safe from our victims when we place ourselves out of their reach.

Even when we are on level ground, our status seekers really don’t like their victims looking them in the eye. Their inability to literally and metaphorically see eye to eye with their victims is an attempt to make our wrongdoers’ wrongs mentally easier to execute. Even when no immediate harm is afoot, status seekers often feel uncomfortable with eye contact from those they are attempting to deceive, like a tell of their paranoia of being found out. The lowering of eyes and the bowing of heads are very common practices among all who are ignorant of our equal worth, as is the fake smile that abandons the eyes. The more we observe these practices, the more lies we find ourselves immersed in.

Sliding up or down the greasy pole of social status can be as easy as changing our clothes, as well as our language. Talking and looking like the more-thans of a group that values our common superficial human grading practices of differing worth, can afford us great advantages. By appealing to the ignorances of all who value such nonsense, we can traverse the perceptions of the ignorant with familiar sounds and bits of cloth.

With the magical ability to wear whatever a social hierarchy has declared as befitting of a superior human being, anyone can at least look as though they are more-than in the eyes of our status seekers. While most of us may prefer to indulge in our high-status more-than perceptions, over our low-status less-than perceptions of cloth and sound, there can be a lot to gain from the less-than perceptions.

By appealing to peoples less-than perceptions, we can get a much more accurate understanding of any individual or group, as they drop their overly pretentious facades they feel are necessary when engaging with those they perceive as more-than. When engaging with those they perceive as less-than, status seekers’ masks can slip, making them more likely to expose their true selves. Their hate and malice come to the fore when engaging with those they believe are less-than, while they fawn over those they believe to be more-than.

Those born into a world of high-status could be forgiven for having such an unbalanced view of many things if all they know is the pretentiousness of the status seekers and flatterers who surround them. However, all they have to do is appeal to any of the less-than ignorances that are always plentiful within such groups, in order to scratch at the truth, should they wish to. As language is all too often used to deceive within our groups, it is always wiser to ignore what people say and observe what people do, rather than adopting the practice that all social hierarchies encourage, in ignoring what they do and heeding what they say.

Chapter 4

History, Herstory and The story

We are all reflections of our past, on both an individual and group level. Human history is like the sunlight of all of our knowledge, which we cannot bask in, because we live within the shadows of the mountains of lies our status seekers and their social hierarchies build around us. History is written and rewritten so many times to suit the interests of our social hierarchies that fantasy replaces truth very quickly.

Many of us will come to value these fantasies over the truth, as they are so frequently and relentlessly repeated within such cultures. Within the course of a lifetime, the truths that we know are often replaced with lies to be valued by those who come after us. Social hierarchies sell so many lies and ignorances as facts that many within their populations have little understanding of the realities of their own time and place. So we can imagine how easy it is for any hierarchy to sell their whoppers about our history, which always makes them look a lot more than they ever are, and how difficult this makes it for such a population to attempt to understand any truths about their own history.

of status-seeking males, and is largely absent of the perspectives of males that do not value the ignorance of differing worth. However, if our hierarchies’ histories are limited to the fantasies of a handful of males, it is almost barren when it comes to the story of our very creators, our females. His story will always have more value than her story within social hierarchies, as harming others is more of a male pastime than a female one. Many historians and other hierarchal propagandists tend to focus on the more glorified or demonised individuals when repeating the stories their masters have approved.

When it comes to hierarchal history, there are very few real people within these embellished accounts, as most people have been reduced to convenient characters or caricatures of who they really were (if they existed at all), to fit in with the dogma of any hierarchies latest version of events and narratives. Thus, labels and identities are attached to individuals and events, according to the ignorances of the time. To define ourselves from this narrow and distorted view of the story of us is not the wisest thing to do, but many of us do just that, as our desire to belong can render the truth as insignificant. For our glorified liars, history is rarely an opportunity they can pass up in order to sell lies of how great and glorious their hierarchies are, were or will be. As our status seekers reduce human history to their petty jostling for elevated worth, our story often goes untold and gets ignored.

When it comes to any social hierarchy, just being male can give us more status than being female, as most of our malevolent status seekers are male, and also due to the fact that females do not need status to find a mate. Who’d be a sexually reproductive species? It is not exclusively males who value male-elevating ignorances, as even a percentage of females champion male superiority, perhaps in an attempt to acquire some of the status that self-glorifying males hand out, or to avoid their harm.

We could argue, for the sake of sexual equality, that it is only fair that females adapt their behaviour to the ignorances of social hierarchies, just as males do. In saying that, the lunacy of devaluing half of our species devalues us as a whole, but as this belittling is used by some males to ensure females want to have sex with males that are perceived as more than they are, as well as being another divisive ignorance, it will always be valued by our social hierarchies master/slave cultures. However, not all males adopt these ignorances, no matter the social pressures that are put upon them to do so.

Within many hunter-gatherer communities, where inequality of wealth and status are nowhere near as gross as any large-scale social hierarchy, there is often no extreme in the value of each sex. Void of the posturing and the ignorances all social hierarchies require, it would seem we may have had sexual equality long before social hierarchies (or civilization, as many like to call it) came up with their pseudo version to mask their hate for all but themselves. We must give these supposedly less developed groups credit, as many have social behaviours to keep any status seekers’ egos and malicious behaviours in check, in order to maintain equality and harmony within their groups. Therefore, when it comes to social wisdom, it is easy to see who is the least developed.

So why do so many of the ignorances between the sexes stream in one direction within these social hierarchal structures? We are all fundamentally the same, but let’s examine the main challenges faced by females and males that may contribute to the arguably universal sexual inequality within large social hierarchies. As our hierarchies are obsessed with dividing people and grading others as less-than, to elevate themselves, perhaps it should be no surprise that male dominated hierarchies declare females as less-than, as they are less engaged in the business of glorified wrongdoing. The obvious main difference between males and females is that females bear the burden of maintaining the species.

Males can play a small part (some smaller than others) in the continuation of our species, but even if a mother abandons her child at birth, in the same way many males do within cultures that encourage females to mate with their glorified males, she has still endured a great burden that no man can come close to in creating life. This is not to devalue the role males play in creating or raising children, merely an acknowledgement of females as the ones that turn a fertilized cell into a human being, and often risk their lives in the process. This is no easy task if we understand the whole process from fertilization to birth as the wonder of biology that it is, but we can devalue anything that appears abundant if we choose to.

The high rate of miscarriages alone demonstrates the complexity and dangers involved in creating life, and with even our modern health industries remaining ignorant about many of the causes of this issue, it is one that will persist. The burden of creating other humans beings is put on the shoulders of females, with many paying the ultimate price of such a burden. Compared with relatively recent times, the fatal cost of this burden has reduced somewhat, thanks to basic hygiene (although there are bound to be an array of status-seeking males champing at the bit to take any credit).

Male’s Gods Can’t Compete

This exclusively female ability may go some way to explaining males’ need for creating gods, to convince females and themselves that it is not females who hold the key to our very existence, but the gods of males (and therefore males), who are of course, by astonishing coincidence, almost exclusively male. Thus, males use fictions to try to seize control from our female creators, in order to imitate the bond of a mother. Maybe at some subconscious level, some males resent females for this life-giving power, and knowing they can’t compete with creating life, they can instead excel in taking it. In doing this, some males may believe this matches or even surpass female’s god-like power over our existence. As our creators and users of gods like to credit their fictions and lies with the giving and taking of life, status-seeking males can claim to control the whole process, and by stripping females of their major role in the creation of humans, status-seeking males monopoly of life and death grants legitimacy to their wrongdoing. Well, within their minds at least.

Let us not forget that males only have the option of creating and using their gods and ignorances, because a female created them within their body. So if males want to worship something, perhaps they should be worshipping females as their true creators and not trying in vain to steal the credit for themselves through their fictions and lies. Although we could argue that all the behaviours (right or wrong) of males that are used to gain a mate is a form of female worship. Instead, our male-dominated social hierarchies make up lies about who created them and their slaves, as a way of stealing and belittling the truth about females’ heavily dominant role in our existence.

As many males who seek positions of power like to think of themselves as some kind of god, their gods are really just a reflection of their own unbalanced egos. When we are created, we could argue that we belong to our creators, and we could argue further that our mothers are by far the major contributors to our creation over our fathers, as our mothers do 99.9% of the work in creating us. Thus, we belong more to our mothers than our fathers. As the property of our mother and father (let’s remove the varied degrees of ownership for now), we are at their mercy from day one, and it is their responsibility to care for their property, while slowly helping us to take responsibility for ourselves. When we are born, we could argue that our hands and our feet are our parents’ hands and feet, and not ours, as we have yet to take responsibility for them. So, when do we belong to ourselves?

Well, we could argue that childhood is the process of taking over ownership of ourselves from our parents. As parents, we try to give our children all the skills needed to one day take full responsibility for themselves, a task some complete sooner than others. There are many factors involved in the cultural devaluing of females by male-driven cultures. Social hierarchies of course, oppress both males and females, so it is not just females who get a raw deal within such social groups, but many oppressed males often take their frustration of their forced servitude to a few males out on females, as they are easier targets than the heavily defended hierarchies who restrict their lives.

Just like all life, we are a cycle that begins with the elements that make us, being borrowed from our environments (our mothers). Like the oxygen in our cells, the carbon in our molecules, the hydrogen in our atoms, the nitrogen in our proteins, the phosphorus and calcium in our bones, the sulphur in our hair, the iron in our blood and all the other elements that make us what we are, all come from the earth through our mothers at the start of our cycle of life. We use these borrowed elements until we die, then we give them back to our environments to be borrowed time and time again, by other life forms, but of course, the beauty of this cycle can be lost on many of us, especially if we struggle to accept our mortality and therefore our reality.

Males may kill each other for bits of earth, so that a few can play god upon it for a while, but there are reasons why we say Mother Earth and not Father Earth. The earth nurtures us like females do, while many males and their gods threaten and harm us, unless we do what they say, of course. The popularity of the gender ignorance within many of our social hierarchies stems in part from the “traditional” roles we now designate for the sexes, in the caring mother and the wrathful father. The concept of femaleness and maleness being reduced to carer and executioner, or the giver of life and the taker of life, is far from a complete understanding of what we are, but is a common caricature among such groups.

Another factor of sexual inequality within cultures of differing worth is the fact that many females need time away from status-seeking in order to take care of their children, while males are expected to be consistent productive servants of their masters. We could argue there is no greater genuine social status than the raising of a child to maturity, but good luck trying to convince any ignorant male glorifying dominated culture of that. As birth control is a relatively recent common option for females, it is no coincidence that the voices that want to address sexual inequality have become louder after the mass availability and effectiveness of birth control gave many females the time to seek status.

Even the female process of menstruation has arguably hindered many females from the status-seeking behaviours our social hierarchies encourage. What we politely call female sanitary products can often be overlooked in freeing females from hiding away during the monthly cycle which is often demoted to a taboo, like many things that are connected to our biology. Although we should recognise the harm these products can cause, and along with the dangers of birth control, females face the threat of harm and even death when using what many refer to as feminine products, because feeding the greed of a few at the cost of the many is a wonderful thing within these cultures.

It may be a wonder why males do not respect the burden of females more, but despite relieving males of the burden of creating human beings, within our modern cultures of serving the interests of the few over anything else, it is easy to see why females are perceived as less-than in a hierarchal economic sense at least. Pregnancy, giving birth and looking after a baby, does not initially feed the greed of the few, whereas males who can be reduced to productive slaves for the totality of their active lives, can. We say initially, as in today’s world, where parents unwittingly trade their children in exchange for belonging by reducing them to legal fictions (so that their hierarchy can exploit them when they come of age as a debt slave), means that producing more humans is producing future sources of income for the few. So from that perspective alone, hierarchies should be more grateful to females for producing their future slaves.

With males having elevated economic value from a hierarchy’s perspective, as they can be exploited constantly, females having babies is less valuable, at least in the short term, than having productive slaves, or taxpayers as we call them today in most parts of the world. Sexual inequality is never just a one-way street, of course, and social issues can only be addressed by understanding and acknowledging the different challenges both sexes face in navigating their social groups. However, as social hierarchies benefit so much from ruling over a divided population, and with their habit of reducing males to labour slaves and females and children to sex slaves, it will never be a genuine priority for any such group.

As we touched on earlier, if we compare hunter-gatherer communities (HGC) that largely serve the whole group over hierarchal cultures that serve the few, the level of inequality between the two is somewhat dramatic. So just for fun, let us imagine a hunter-gatherer group that is only a few hundred strong or even less. Everyone would be expected to participate in aiding the group and in sharing effort and reward. By using the more efficient strategy of cooperating instead of competing with one another, gross inequality becomes less likely. Twinned with the fact that most within a smaller group would be closely related, and this alone would encourage a more understanding culture than the cultures of greed that too many of us are familiar with today. Within these smaller groups, most, if not all, would likely know what is going on within the group, so that everyone knows what needs to be done for survival or when a threat arises. Unlike our social hierarchies that constantly lie to their populations about what is going on within the group, by manufacturing the harshness of survival and exaggerating things of little to no threat and playing down real threats.

In the more inclusive cooperative environments of a HGC, there would be less room for status seekers to get away with their lies, let alone the formation of status-seeking societies aimed at serving a few of its members at the cost of everyone else. Many of the remaining hunter-gatherers that exist today show vastly more equality, not just among the sexes, but even within the very young and very old. Two groups that get little respect in many of our social hierarchies (unless we happen to be a wealthy male), although we could argue this is in part because such age groups are not usually productive slaves.

As HGC have less tolerance of those we would recognise as status seekers, the braggers, users, liars, manipulators and wrongdoers can be dealt with in a way that curtails their egos and wrongs, as HGC appear to understand the destructiveness of such behaviours to their community. It is not uncommon for persistent status seekers to be killed by such groups in order to maintain social harmony. We do not have an instinct to enslave ourselves into serving the interests of a few over our own or our groups, so all social hierarchies must force or manipulate people to adopt and value this behaviour.

This brings us on to the violence of males. There is an awakening of violence in males that can gain great value in the minds of many, as a way to force others to serve their interests. Let’s call this the enforcement ability realization (why not), where many males usually come to realize around puberty that they can force others to do what they want, by using their new-found size and strength that is gained when leaving childhood to enter adulthood. It is for this reason that young male adults, who often value this newfound ability more than most, are the keenest of all human age groups to use violence upon their fellow humans, and therefore the easiest group to manipulate into acting out the malicious intent that all social hierarchies require to survive.

As males pass puberty and sex becomes important, in turn, social status becomes very important in attracting females within such groups. As most of our social status is based on violence, it is no great surprise that young males are overly keen to harm others, as violence gains status and status gains sex. On a social scale, violence is always used to establish and maintain dominance over others, from teenage gangs to social hierarchies’ armies, males clustering together for safety in numbers in a desperate bid to increase their attraction to females. Males who surround themselves with wingmen to do their cheerleading for them, pander to many females’ desire for popularity and status in a mate. This “status” rarely has to be based on much, just as long as it is enough to be perceived as a marked difference within the minds of the targeted females.

As males, the environments we have been subjected to plays a huge role in whether or not we understand all the ramifications of this ability, and our tendency to use it as a way of navigating our way through life, or to solve problems. We could argue that the younger we are in valuing or experiencing this ability, the more likely we will come to depend on it. Many males understand this ability and the costs of its use, yet have no interest in using it to serve themselves at the cost of others, but many males can’t resist its use in serving their own selfish interests, regardless of the harm they cause. For those who value the unjust use of this ability, it can even become a measure of how male they are. A concept that requires so many ignorances, but one that persists in all social hierarchies, regardless of its time or place.

No matter the excuses we use to justify unjust violence, it tends to attract more violence to counter it, so one act of violence can spiral into generations of harm being traded from one group to another. Females will generally always be less willing to kill another mother’s child than males are, and with the burden of creating human beings, we could argue that most females understand or feel the consequences of such a loss to a deeper level than many males do. However, with malicious status-seeking males killing other males in order to increase the chances of females having sex with them (because there are fewer males to choose from), unjust violence is not likely to end within any social hierarchy.

Violence works in achieving many things, and there is no social hierarchy that exists without its aid, no matter how often they repeat the phrase “violence achieves nothing”. Their populations are constantly under the threat of violence if they do not obey the wishes of their hierarchy. Even the embellished histories of all social hierarchies are overflowing with the glorification of violence. For many males, violence is a coping strategy, and the use of violence can become a way of gaining value with like-minded people. When violent males have influence over other males, they can promote their glorification of violence to encourage others to value and participate in it as a way of gaining status.

Males who perceive females as less than themselves have an arsenal of ignorances at their disposal for anyone with a lack of awareness to adopt. Males obviously inflict much of their violence upon other males, but with the devaluing of females, violence towards females can become justified within such ignorant minds. Many hierarchies not only encourage this behaviour but even deem it necessary in their laws (made by males, of course). As most (if not all) of the lies and fictions within our hierarchal cultures are backed with violence, it may be understandable why so many value such nonsense, but by valuing things that are only propped up with violence, we devalue so much.

Exploiting the advantage in size and strength is obviously something that many males are too weak to avoid in order to abuse the opposite sex and even children. As many status-seeking males take advantage of their size and status to force females and children to have sex with them, we could argue that a percentage of males will always use these advantages to indulge their base desires. Social hierarchies themselves are created by males as a way of convincing females to have sex with them, hence why social status has so much value within the minds of many when it comes to the mating game.

Putting much of the wrongdoing in the world down to a percentage of males who are so desperate for sex that they will do anything to get it may sound like an exaggeration, but it is not without merit. After all, what stronger instinct does any life form have than the instinct to continue the species? Although murdering much of it may seem counterintuitive, so perhaps it is just the instinct to engage in the act that drives us most. Social status is used by many animals to allow males to have sex with willing and unwilling females, and even their young. So in many ways, for animals like us, status is just our way of glorifying coercion and rape. Hence, why our males that have convinced others to perceive them as more-than can rape at will within such rape-friendly cultures, knowing their elevated worth allows them to avoid any negative consequences for their actions.

The Mating Game

Speaking of consequences for our actions, as females endure the brunt of them when it comes to sex, abortions are almost a necessary option for many females, especially within our rape-friendly cultures that proliferate wrongdoing, but also when armed with knowledge of any potential extreme suffering for their child. However, as we are dealing with social hierarchies, where glorifying males over females is common, it is almost inevitable that we get whole cultures that find it acceptable to use abortions as a way of ensuring a male offspring.

Aborting or abandoning a child simply for no other reason than it being female is a consequence of our more-than/less-than cultures. When status can mean the difference between life and death, we open ourselves up to such cruelty and brutality. When we take into consideration that parents who discriminate towards one sex can take this ignorance to such an extreme that they kill their own child, we could argue that some may be better off avoiding a childhood under the control of such minds.

Some may interpret aborting a fetus as murder, but killing newborns and infants is much more befitting of the term and may sound evil to many, but killing our young is a practice that many of our groups have engaged in for as long as our history books go back, and probably before we were even human, as infanticide is common among many animals. Females tend to get the raw end of the infanticide deal. Even many hunter-gatherer groups have higher rates of female infanticide than male.

We are not exclusively killing more females than males in every human group, but there is a strong preference towards female infanticide. So it raises the question, why are we so violent towards female babies and toddlers? It may purely be a resource decision or removing evidence of rape, but whatever the reasons, there is often some kind of logic (as defined by the beholder) behind it, even if it may seem unjustified to others outwith such cultures or circumstances. The needless murder of children is a brutality our hierarchies frequently engage in, and it will never end when we allow a few to indulge in every wrong without consequence.

The practice of passing down the property and wealth of a family to males only, is common among many social hierarchies, as females are often deemed unworthy of having property or wealth. This goes some way in explaining the behaviour of male preference, not to mention the ritual of maintaining a family name through the male line. Although this probably also has a lot to do with a female’s need to convince a male that he is the father of her child. With males holding on to property, sons are often more able to look after their parents into old age than daughters, who are often married off to live with another family.

Then there is the expectation of a dowry, or where the bride’s family is expected to pay for a wedding that a poor family cannot afford. And not forgetting the fact that males often have more income potential than females. Many of the social environments we create (we being mostly males) are geared towards a male/female divide that, unsurprisingly, encourages a preference for males. In cultures that glorify males over females, females can expect to be treated as less than their male brothers to the point where their lives are seen as disposable, and many receive harsher treatment, not to mention less nutrition and healthcare. Males can go beyond the psychotic with their abuses to fulfil their desires and in their pursuit to ensure the children of the females they mate with are theirs. But the practice of mutilating and sewing up females genitals and chopping bit off of males genitals, has to win some kind of award in the evil raving loony championship.

Within our cultures of greed, males are encouraged to engage in flattery and mimicry of their hierarchy to attain wealth and status in order to attract females. While females are encouraged to pander to the beauty standards of their glorified males, in order to attract a glorified male. Although males are arguably less fussy when it comes to sex, many females are encouraged to view most males who have little interest in harming others to attain some superficial elevated worth as unworthy of their attention. With often a larger percentage of females seeking the very small percentage of glorified males, our glorified males ensure they have an over-abundance of females who are more than willing to have sex with them, outwith those they can coerce or rape when exploiting others with impunity is available.

With many females seeking to attain the advantages and delusions that come with being part of a glorified class, this encourages the glorified males to inflict more and more harm onto other males in order to ensure their dominance over female selection. Many of our glorified male wrongdoers have even descended into the brutal practice of castrating their male competition, as a way of ensuring they have sole or more access to females. Parents have even castrated their own sons in order to have them valued by their glorified wrongdoers when they reach adulthood. The term “having a ball” may not have always been a fun pastime for all. Thankfully, for most modern-day males, social or financial castration is the more popular method of ensuring glorified males attract the most females.

In saying that, our high-status males still partake in castrating less-than males. Today, we call it chemical castration and pretend that it is “humane” because it is only for less-thans. In the golden age of our chemical killers, it was inevitable that our glorified wrongdoers would create chemicals to castrate their slaves with, to take over from the arguably more brutal form. We do like to develop more sophisticated ways to harm and kill one another, go us. With the development of our castrating chemicals from the 1940s, our glorified wrongdoers have looked at several markets for their drugs. Using them on “bad” rapists as opposed to the glorified ones has been touted and still used in many countries. The even more dystopian scenario of sterilizing less-thans, or the poor, as those who lavish from their toil like to call them, was, is and probably always will have value within our more deluded minds.

As the poor have not all been castrated (masters still need labour and sex slaves until we create acceptable substitutes), our peddlers in reproductive genocide have turned to the health industry that they have monopolised to sell their wares. Using them as cancer “treatments” is almost a given, as what monopolised toxic, harmful substances are not used by the cancer industry? But targeting the market of pre-pubescent children is particularly evil, even for our seasoned wrongdoers.

Rebranding chemical castration as puberty blockers, and then creating a market for them by demonising and ostracising anyone who refuses to bow to their evangelical sales pitch of gender being a fluid concept, that only good people understand, can only be taken seriously within our cultures of sycophants and idiots. By allowing the few to exploit our children in such a way, we must recognise that our family units and the communities that should protect our children have been totally decimated and conquered by our hierarchies’ greed. But what’s new?

When it comes to continuing the species, young females are the superstars. Thus, they are the greatest resource of all social hierarchies and the thing they all fight over, and why they are predominantly made up of old males looking to sell themselves as more-than, in order to attract, force or buy young females for sex. What better way for old males to force or convince young females to have sex with them than using the fictions of status and wealth, especially as they may lack the athleticism or attractiveness of young males.

Social status can be boiled down to a tool used by males (old and young, but especially for the old) to have sex with young females. Not to dismiss the attractiveness of old females, but within the confines of the mating game, older females become more reproductively redundant. Biologically speaking, this arguably makes total sense, as children rely on their mothers much more than their fathers in those first few years, so by limiting females’ ability to reproduce around middle age, nature reduces the chances of many children losing their mothers in their crucial early years.

Within these environments, males can either use their charm, good looks, wealth or status to attract females, but knowing wealth and status are more likely to aid in the avoidance of any consequences of rape than charm and good looks, this encourages our malicious males to seek these tools of immunity. The social hierarchal mating game is, has and always will be a dirty business. We are not the only species to suffer from the ignorance of social status, and it is rather common within primates, but we are a species that is capable of overcoming it, potentially at least. But we should not hold our breath. Females within most species have most of the control when it comes to reproduction, so our males desire to harm females in a bid to control them to such extreme levels could be viewed as our males’ way of wrestling that sexual control from females, and in turn feed their view of males being superior to females. It’s fair to say that we could judge the worth of any of our male societies by the way females and children are treated within them.

In many ways, males are far less complex than females, especially when it comes to sex, as the male’s role in reproduction comes as the bit part players as far as bearing the burden of maintaining the species is concerned. Females, on the other hand, must pay a heavier price for bearing most of that burden, so sex for females can be a lot more complicated with heavier consequences. Many males will use just about any tool or strategy they can to engage in sex, so females have evolved counters to offset many of the array of disingenuous methods males use to encourage them to engage in sex, especially before contraception limited the consequences of sex.

Take the ignorance of differing worth as an example. Now, even though it is an ignorance (in the sense that it only exists within the mind of the beholder), it is one that has widespread value and as such plays a huge role in creating a social environment where it has meaning. Females (and males) must adapt to that environment or face the consequences of it. Therefore, in the minds of many who suffer from this ignorance, choosing who to or not to have sex with based on their social worth becomes a very real concern. A superficial concern, perhaps, just to gain or maintain any social status they feel they have or want, but there is little within social hierarchies that escapes being reduced to valuing the superficial. This public mating system is important in the race for status, but more often than not, this ignorance is abandoned when hidden from public view.

Social status can be a fickle thing, and both sexes face differing standards in risking losing their status, making the status of whom we mate with a reflection of our own. Females often risk more, as high-status males are far less likely to avoid losing status by having sex with low-status females, than high-status females are if they have sex with low-status males. However, females, like males, will also use elevated status for sex when given the chance, even if it is to a lesser public degree than males. The social status mating game is all rather ridiculous, but it all makes sense when we understand that social status is a strategy many animals use to allow some males to have sex with a wider selection of females.

Many females and males have no interest in the public status mating game, but as they are subjected to those who do, they are often pressured or even forced into having sex with those that their group bestows elevated worth upon. The glorified rape culture’s social status facilitates, ensures rape is common within social hierarchies, as “winners” deserve their spoils, even if those spoils are unwilling human beings. With a third of all women worldwide reportedly being subjected to either physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, or non-partner sexual violence, in their lifetime, it shows the level of violence females endure, even at the hands of those who claim to care for them at some level.

In some parts of the world, over 70% of females endure this abuse, and this is only the females that admit to experiencing it. It can be a dangerous business being a female within the hierarchal mating game, and with many of all the females murdered in the world every year having their lives cut short by a sexual partner, sex can be a deadly business for females. If a third of females endure such abuse, we can at least take from this that most (two-thirds) females avoid such a fate, thus most males are not so fragile that they feel the need to harm or even kill their sexual partners in order to prove their maleness, or fulfil some other delusion. However, it is a huge number of our fellow human beings that we are abusing and murdering on a regular basis.

The rape-friendly cultures of social hierarchies are content to continue the abuse and suffering of generation after generation, as forcing others to have sex with them is the advantage social status provides our status seekers. The farce of rape victims appealing to their rapists or their minions for justice is played out within every social hierarchy, although many know the pointlessness of going through these facades that sell themselves as justice systems, hence the low reporting of such crimes.

With many territorial, financial, and religious social hierarchies organising their rape/paedophile clubs to celebrate their immunity to justice, the disinterest in rapists and paedophiles or their enablers, holding their fellow wrongdoers accountable, surprises few. Lack of accountability is always a problem within hierarchies as they need to allow wrongdoing to thrive, so violence towards females is something that hierarchal groups will always suffer from, given the nature of their existence. But it is always possible to reduce the violence even within these havens of wrongdoing.

Having said all this about males abusing females, many males are more comfortable with committing acts of violence against other males. Violent males tend to attack males in a public setting as they can’t gain social status from violence without an audience, or at least a cheerleader to regurgitate the “glory” of their deeds. However, when it comes to attacking females and children, this is done mostly behind closed doors, as doing so in front of other males could diminish their status, even within cultures that glorify such violence. Males attacking other males as a way of attracting females who admire the ability to harm others is perhaps a valued belief for females, as such acts of violence may be useful in defending them from other violent males. However, hoping to avoid violence by partnering with a violent male may not be the best strategy for avoiding violence.

There is nothing like the glorification of war to convince young men to go around killing one another, and our social hierarchies do love war as it achieves many things for them. Setting aside all the control, slaves, never-ending enemies, resources, wealth and power that inspires war, when it comes to sex, war is great for high-status old males in particular. In war, old males convince young males that there is great honour in dying young, but how would they know?

War is little more than one hierarchy wanting the resources or control of another group or competing hierarchy, yet few who fight in wars acknowledge they are only fighting for the privilege of maintaining or enhancing the wealth of a few, or being enslaved by hierarchy X or hierarchy Y. War gives wealth to the victors, wealth acquires status and status acquires female adulation, so we could argue females love violence as much as males, even if it is only in a roundabout way. From an old, high-status male’s perspective, war is a great way of eliminating much of the young male population in order to free up the sexual availability of their population of young females. Genocide may seem an extreme motive for sex, but we should never underestimate the desire for sex.

We are not the only animal whose males are motivated to kill their own species just to have sex, and evolutionarily speaking, this strategy leads to less genetic diversity. So it seems like a self-harming behaviour that would reduce survival capabilities for those species that partake in this activity. Yet here we are, doing just that with our limited genetic diversity. So it begs the question, has our lack of genetic diversity made us better slaves who will gladly kill and die to feed the greed of a few, or do we kill and die for our masters simply as an adaptation to avoid being killed by them? And if we are the ones that survive, do we really care?

Although if we are honest, how many of us have ever taken into account the genetic diversity of our species during sex? The whole advantage of the evolution of sex over other forms of reproduction is the fact that it produces vastly more genetic diversity that aids in adaptability for survival, but with our status seekers’ desire (conscious or unconscious) to limit the genetic diversity of their populations, we could argue that limiting our genetic diversity is the cost to animals like ourselves that use social status for reproduction.

Males are capable of extreme wrongs in their pursuit of sex, and will often make up any nonsense to justify any actions. One of the most common practices males engage in is where one group demonises another group to the point that the dominant group declares the dominated group as unworthy of existing, and proceeds to kill all within that group, except the young females, whom they often spare to be used as sex slaves. Many of these rapists (or men as they often prefer to call themselves) then go on to demonise and enslave their own children, as they deem them as belonging to the less-than group (Father’s Day cards at the ready).

Some groups, instead of killing or enslaving all the males of the less-than group, resort to castrating them to prevent the less-than males from diluting their “purity” with the more-than group of females, or perhaps in some kind of futile effort to end the lineage of the group they have declared unworthy of existing. But it really just comes down to sex envy. Killing a group of our cousins may wipe them from our aggressor’s versions of history, but not their genetic history that resides within most, if not all, of us, even those who participate in any genocide. Perhaps many believed it was males alone who continued the lineage of a people, or it is just another lie they used to excuse their wrongs, but by breeding with the females of the less-than group, the less-than lineage continues, and the more-than males get what they really wanted, sex.

“Your country needs thieves, thugs, rapists and murderers to feed the greed of a few”, may not be as catchy as “your country needs you” when inviting members of a population’s slave classes to join in the mass orgy of wrongdoing planned by their masters, but it would be a more honest slogan. Sex is used as a tool of war, and war as an excuse for many less-than males to rape, as they know they will almost certainly get away with it. The females of any group that is the target of a hierarchy will often be demonised by the rapists who call themselves soldiers.

Of course, some males will rape other females, males and children with or without a war as an excuse, but many males who rape during war may not see themselves as rapists, and their hierarchies certainly won’t, as long as their fellow rapists have been serving the interests of their hierarchy. Instead, these mass rapes are often excused as unfortunate but acceptable things that happen in war. In order to maintain a steady stream of willing cannon fodder, all social hierarchies must glorify those who are good at obeying without question. So calling a rapist a rapist may not encourage more rapists to join the hordes of killer slaves. Let’s face it, when recruiting people to murder others and risk death, it is not as if any hierarchy is going to be too fussy on who jumps when asked to jump, as long as anyone but the hierarchy is doing the jumping, that’s all they really care about.

Hierarchies give their rapists medals and build statues in their honour, to encourage the next generation of rapists to join the rape gangs that can avoid any of the consequences they may face when committing such acts outside of war (depending on their social status, of course). Many of these rapists may never have raped before and may even go on to never rape again. So why, within the orgy of wrongdoing that is war, is rape perceived in the minds of many males as somehow acceptable? With the lack of accountability, rape becomes an opportunity many can’t pass up on. Rape can even be sold to slave soldiers as a reward for risking their lives to increase the wealth of a few. What this says about the human psyche is rather interesting, in that no matter how much we dress ourselves up as some kind of moral being, when these thin veils of morality are cast off, most of us are fundamentally immoral beings that just play with the idea of morality as a pastime, in order to fool ourselves and others into believing that we are more than what we are.

We share the practice of mating raids with many animals, where young adult males form packs to attack other groups in order to have sex with the females of that group. We, just like many other animals, often kill the males of another group to have sex with the females and their young. And again, we, like other animals, will kill the males and the young in order to coerce females into breeding with their family’s killers.

However, we, unlike other animals, will kill not only the males and the young of a group, but even all the females too (not before raping them, of course). We could argue that we do this in a futile effort to wipe out the “bloodline” of an enemy, or to pander to those who have no control over their egos. As brutal as it is to kill all the males and young of a group in order to breed with the females of that group, it does at least serve a purpose for the attacking males in creating the opportunity to breed. However, as we can slaughter all, it begs the question, are we less moral, less intelligent or just more malicious than other animals that engage in the practice without killing all?

With our money monopolists’ never-ending orchestrated wars, they ensure a steady supply of females and young children they can use for sex. While many of their wars may appear to be futile from the perspective of changing fictions on a map, or the needless excessive death tolls of mostly males, they are always fruitful from the perspective of our mating raids behaviour. Even in complete victory, by taking over the medium of worth within any group, we coerce the females of that group to prioritise sex with the males who control their worth within the group. As sex is our biggest motivator, what we call war is mostly a variant or an extension of the mating raid behaviour. If our hierarchies were honest, their rallying cries for war may be “Your country needs you to kidnap children and young females form a foreign land to become the sex slaves of your glorified rapist”, and they’d no doubt still get volunteers.

We could argue that much of our history is about sex, and rape plays a role in this. Many, most, or even all of us may owe our very existence to rape. Perhaps not the most pleasant of dinner party conversations, but no less relevant to our existence. To inject a little understanding into the consistency of rape during war, we must take into account that within many social hierarchal cultures, females are encouraged to avoid low-status males and to attract males who have a degree of elevated worth.

This can lead to limited options for low-status males, and it is in the interest of high-status males to encourage low-status males to take their frustrations out by going to war and killing each other off, rather than attacking or retaliating against their true oppressors. War is always a win-win for high-status males to increase their mating options with their female populations by reducing the male population, as well as acquiring sex slaves from the spoils of war.

War, with the promise of females and children to be used and abused, can present a very real motivation for not just high-status males but also many low-status males. That and the elevation in social status that always comes in varying degrees for those willing to obey the whims of their hierarchy, can help sell the participation in war and a good thing for many. By offering low-status males forced mating opportunities that their cultures may deny them, our hierarchies can ensure a steady supply of cannon fodder.

This is not to excuse rape within or outwith war, merely to understand some of the reasons that contribute to a percentage of males’ base desires overriding any sense of compassion or right and wrong, although as those with such traits are never too keen on wrongdoing, they are often weeded out from the group of wrongdoers. Sex has a way of showing us that when we strip away all our pretentiousness and ignorances, we really have not evolved as much as many may think we have from other forms of life.

Dying for Sex

War is of course, not all sunshine, rape and unaccountability for males. Being used as cannon fodder for the greed of a few renders most males as vastly more disposable than females. The murder of males often ranges from sad to expected, while the murder of females is more tragic to unacceptable. However, the murder of children is always evil to tragic and murdering babies goes beyond even this. Well, for some more than others. Although no hierarchy has any real issue with such things. The length of time we have lived plays a role in how much we can be demonised and therefore, worthy of being murdered.

When our hierarchies inflict their wrongs onto others, they often use the term civilian or people to describe their murdered victims, who are always labelled under the less-than group. Yet when those they wish to demonise, exploit, invade, harm, or kill any from the more-than group or those who attach themselves to their glorified wrongdoers fictions, these victims are then often described as men, women and children in order to paint their rivals as more unethical in some way for committing the very same act. Although defending and attacking does not fall under the same act, the stronger force often attempts to paint themselves as the defenders, even though they are almost always the attackers.

By demoting their victims to the generic term of people or even monsters, and promoting their casualties to heroes, or men, women and children, our glorified wrongdoers are attempting to devalue their victims while overvaluing their casualties, just to sell the lie that they are more moral or more humane than their rivals. When desperate to mask their own wrongs, it is not uncommon for our dominant hierarchies to throw babies into the mix in an attempt to dehumanise their rivals further. But this is just more of the same old hypocrisy that our status seekers value, as most dominant hierarchies tend to murder vastly more children and babies than their rivals do.

As adult males are the sexual competitors of every social hierarchy, and they are allotted little to no sympathy when they are murdered by any hierarchies war machine (yet the murder of women, children and especially babies are always used to muster some pathetic validation or glorification of their mass wrongdoing), we could argue that this disposability is just one of the burdens of being a sexually mature male within such groups. The predominantly male pastime of murdering one another is more acceptable when males of sexual maturity are being murdered, simply because it lessens competition for females for the high-status males who orchestrate the wars between their male slaves. The murder of very young and very old males garners less support due to their lesser threat of sexual access to females, as well as their lesser physical threat.

Sex is a powerful motivator, and for many males, it drives them to become cruel and oppressive towards females in an attempt to wrestle sexual control in their favour. Belittling, beating and rape are all used to place males above females in the eyes of such fragile minds. When these abusers are given free rein (as those in a social hierarchy are) to fulfil their delusions of superiority, they can build whole cultures around the abuse of females and sell it as something glorious and great or even cultural.

Many suggestible males within such cultures can be convinced to adopt the behaviours of their hierarchy and oppress their own mothers, sisters, cousins, daughters…etc. Many males who obsessively control females often do so because they are trying to ensure they are the only ones who have sexual access to the females under their control. This harsh treatment also increases the chances of any offspring being theirs, even if they don’t win any father or lover of the year contests.

To be fair to males, the uncertainty of being the father to any female’s child is always there, unless they have held a female captive out of the reach of other males (a practice that is not exactly unheard of). Many hostilities between the more insecure within the sexes stem from this reasonable doubt, so females can often be offended at the mere raising of this very real issue, as they misinterpret a timeless male concern for an insult on their character. While females can also be very controlling, they have less need to go to such extremes, as a male’s “virtue” is far less important to females, and females are always 100% sure that any offspring is theirs (well, mostly). Just these two differences alone make the mating game a very different experience for males and females. Both sexes can be blind to the subtleties of each other’s struggles or behaviours, and often make the mistake of putting their own sex’s interpretations of a behaviour, onto the other.

Within our cults of status, being more male or even more female becomes a very real delusion for many. The alpha, beta and more recently added sigma definitions of personality that are used to reduce any individual’s character to two or now three types, is of course ridiculous. While these definitions of our mindsets and behaviours are little more than caricatures of what we are and do, they represent some of the differing interpretations we hold when it comes to how we interact with others.

The alpha and beta nonsense represent the status seekers and their victims, as they mire themselves in the game of differing worth. Alphas are categorised as dominating betas, while betas are categorised as being servile to alphas. Thus, both seek status to some degree. But sigmas (a newly created category that has been made up to try and explain those that don’t fall into the first two) represents non-status seekers who have no interest in playing the game of differing worth, as they know it to be futile beyond the perceptions of the ignorant.

When two status seekers interact with one another, they play the game of more-than/less-than, so one can “win” the perception of alpha, while one “loses” to gain the perception of beta. When two non-status seekers interact with one another, there is no need or desire to engage within such superficial perspective nonsense, this helps to eliminate much of the superficial practices and time-wasting status seekers mire themselves in. When status seekers interact with non-status seekers, there is more often than not a declaration of victory in the mind of the status seeker, as they perceive the non-status seekers disinterest in the more-than/less-than game as proof that they are the alpha. While these interactions can lead to status seekers perceiving non-status seekers as beta to their alpha, they can also leave the status seeker with a degree of confusion as to why some do not value the game of chasing perceived elevated worth.

As young adult males (with their ability for violence) are always the greatest threat to any social hierarchy, they are encouraged to value the lies of their manipulators in order to surrender control of what they think and do. As long as most young males buy into old males fictions and value their wealth and status, and don’t work out who their true oppressors are, or more importantly, don’t do anything to threaten their glorified wrongdoers’ interests, they can be valued members of their hierarchy’s society.

Social hierarchies can control other males’ ability to appeal to females by forcing them to become obedient and productive slaves. This allows some females to believe such males are inferior to their oppressors. By using wealth creation and monopolisation as a form of social worth, hierarchies can bestow varying levels of value on their male populations as a result of living within these environments of social inequality, while females’ worth is mostly reduced to their sexual attractiveness to males. From any social hierarchy’s perspective, young males are competition for young females, and therefore must be made to bow to their will if they wish to attain any social worth, while young females, as the goal, gain status by having sex with high-status males.

As old males have had longer to acquire more wealth and status than young males, old males can use their wealth and status to control a large percentage of young males by taking advantage of a small percentage of highly obedient young males. By granting their more servile young males with a monopoly on violence to create a force that will protect them from less obedient younger males, combined with the privilege of unaccountability to threaten and harm anyone that may not be too keen on being the servants of glorified wrongdoers, this precious and well protected group of overly obedient young males can ensure old males maintain their dominance over a population, even when they themselves are well past their physical prime. Our hierarchal cultures that aid old males sexual access to young females at the cost of young males, makes young males the most expendable people within such cultures, as old males are more than happy to help repopulate the losses that their wrongdoings encourage.

The Deluded Mating Years

The mating game has a huge effect on us all. We can go from intelligent life forms to these obsessive creatures blind to other realities around us. Nature is arguably wise to encourage us to focus so much of our time and effort into reproduction, but we could argue it doesn’t always have a positive effect on our survival. After all, regularly killing off much of your own species does little in achieving long-term survival for any species, not to mention the huge loss of genetic diversity such behaviour causes.

Most, if not all, of us are largely free from the ignorance of differing worth when we are outside of the mating years, as it is only when we hit around puberty that this ignorance gains more and more value for most of us. Then, once we are old and grey and reproduction becomes less important, we no longer need to value this ignorance as much.

From a reproduction perspective, if old males want to reproduce, they require a younger female. Hence why our hierarchal social structure ensures old high-status males can gain more sexual access to young females than they arguably could in a less oppressive social structure. For the sake of argument, let’s say the mating years are around 15 to 50ish, generally speaking. Many of us within these years can become preoccupied with the mating game and even define ourselves and others by it, and our interpretations of it. Social status and many of the ignorances that stem from it can gain great value within these years more than any other stage, as both sexes try to sell themselves to one another depending on the culture’s definitions of what makes each sex desirable. Therefore, many of us abandon much of what we are in an attempt to live up to those definitions.

The mating years also ignites the ego when status becomes real within the minds of the users. If we try to feed our need to be special, our egos can become very unbalanced, very quickly. With an unbalanced ego and chasing status, it is inevitable that we will develop a clouded view on reality. For this reason, in many ways, when we are very young and very old, we tend to be more understanding, logical and reasonable human beings than we are within the mating years, especially when it comes to defining ourselves and others accurately.

Perhaps, void of the paranoia of suspicion and the emotional turmoil the desire to attract and maintain a mate can cause, our minds unclouded by the mating game, can be used for other cognitive activities. It is no coincidence that the very old and the very young have the least social status in our hierarchal world, as they are generally less egotistical and so have no need of it (also they tend not to make the best slaves or taxpayers), yet in cultures less dominated by the ignorance of differing worth, like some hunter-gatherer groups, the old and young have a lot more value bestowed upon them, as well they should. The very young and the very old are often wiser than our status seekers (who isn’t) who are often too preoccupied with sex and its surrounding effects. Thus, wisdom is often more easily surrendered when mired in the mating years.

With the pursuit of status being primarily a male pursuit, in that it serves as a front for the pursuit of females, it inevitably leaves its mark on our hierarchal cultures as a grossly unbalanced division of value within the sexes. We see this in almost every field, with only the exception of the low valued fields of caring and cleaning, as these are seen as a more subservient feminine roles. It is of course, not that males are more competent in every task other than caring or cleaning than females are, but males are vastly more prone to exaggerating their level of competence than females. There are a few tasks that don’t make a lie of male superiority, but that does not stop many believing it to be true within cultures of status.

Let’s take the basic task of cooking, as most of us, if not all of us, engage in this task to some degree, as we all must eat. The idea that males are better cooks is laughable to anyone who understands cooking, but for many who value status, it is a valued ignorance. The catering world (like most industries) is brimming with males desperately seeking titles and awards, in the very male pursuit of status and recognition.

Defining cooking or any other field by the fashions and whims of those who bestow titles and awards (mostly males, of course) is ridiculous. But it all plays into the more-than/less-than ignorances social hierarchies use to survive. Many value ignorances simply on the basis of the level of wealth and status generated by the act, rather than the final product. Anyone who gets paid to cook and therefore pays taxes to their hierarchy, will always have more status than those who can cook better food but don’t pay taxes to their masters, as is the case for many females that fall under a title like housewife.

The pursuit of status, recognition and wealth will always be encouraged by hierarchies, as they control the monopoly on such things within their populations. The seekers of these things must feed the greed of their hierarchies, but it is of course, a very flawed and hugely inefficient system, as far as creating thriving, cohesive and progressive human groups is concerned.

The idea that some are so much more than others can only become wide spread with ignorances. This even leads to notions of “the greatest” becoming very real concepts within such ignorant minds. The lack of understanding in developing a skill or talent is abundantly clear within such cultures that waste so much. We waste so much time, potential, resources, and lives when prioritising the greed of a few.

Let’s examine “the greatest” concept ignorance a little, just for the fun of it. It is obvious that within the constraints of every social hierarchy, the lack of opportunity stifles the depths of skills people can develop. So within these oppressive cultures, we could argue that the greatest surgeons have never touched a scalpel, the greatest inventors have never penned their inventions, the greatest biologists have never seen a cell, the greatest leaders have never given an order, the greatest carpenters have never touched a chisel, or the greatest artists have never touched a paint brush. We could go on, but needless to say, the greatest concept is mainly used by male status seekers as a way of exaggerating their worth to themselves and others who value such nonsense.

Normally, this ignorance can be humoured by competing with a relatively small number of people, by proving to be more competent at a task under certain conditions within a certain time period. To be ignorant of how we developed our competence in any task can lead to us to allow our unbalanced egos to aid us in indulging in such an ignorance. Every human being on the planet is better at something than most other human beings on the planet, and every one of us can choose from wallowing in the ignorances of our ego and define ourselves and others by the things we are good at, to accepting the fact that we are all capable of many different things, without the need to grade the worth of anyone based on those things.

We can use our ego to help us value what others within our social group’s value, so if we are born into a violent group, then violence can give us value, thus we can attach our ego to violence. If our group values tool creation, then its tool creation. Whatever the groups that we are born into values, can hugely influence our sense of self-worth and, as such, the ego we attach to it. However, this will not apply to all, as all groups have many ignorances and inefficiencies that will be glaring to many.

Those who recognise these ignorances, rather than adopting the group’s established values, may direct their ego in a different direction or observe the futility of using it to support their ignorances. We can be guilty of defining ourselves by the time and place in which we exist, but if we broaden our self-definitions beyond these somewhat superficial parameters, we can gain vastly more accurate definitions of ourselves.

The ego can be very useful when controlled to a degree, but when it is uncontrolled, then its desire to be more-than or dominate others can become a nightmare for those who have to put up with them. Those who force their will onto others often do so because they lack something within themselves. So by taking from and harming others, they can create a sense of lacking in their victims. Perhaps this allows our wrongdoers to feel normal or better about themselves, and ignore or forget their shortcomings. Many males tend to attach their ego to dominating others in order to inflate their self-worth, so the more-than/less-than ignorances are rife among such males, even to the extent where they can believe they are god-like. To lose touch with reality to the extent that we believe we are some kind of god is sadly not uncommon.

Greatness is a thing that can be found within the uncontrolled ego of men (and women), but wherever there is greatness, there is just someone with an unbalanced ego and a load of ignorances. As a species, we often suffer from these deluded minds when we achieve any kind of ability, power or control over others. When we become blinded to reality, it can be such a shock to us when our ignorances are exposed, that our whole sense of self-worth can be destroyed. It usually requires the enablement of others for this state of delusion to be reached. So this is why it is common for those who believe themselves to be great, surround themselves with those who enable this delusion, rather than those who favour the truth.

Being flanked by flatterers and hangers-on may do wonders for our ego, but it won’t do the same for our level of understanding. Now, of course, we all have an ego, regardless of our sex, and the uncontrolled female ego can be a whole different kind of nightmare. The female ego tends to be a lot more subtle and a shadow of the males in terms of causing harm to others, in scale at least, but can be more than equal in terms of malice. Perhaps as our main creators, and with more understanding of the preciousness of life, their desire to harm others is greatly reduced compared to males.

Even when it comes to the love lives of people, social hierarchies can’t help trespassing on the privacy of grown adults who choose to become lovers. So we end up with rituals such as marriage as a way of profiteering from and monopolizing human behaviour. Those who bow to the nonsense of their hierarchy are rewarded with status and wealth in the form of tax relief, titles and the like. It even becomes common within these social structures to belittle those who do not engage in their hierarchy’s rituals. Marriage can be reduced to males branding a female as theirs, as a way of discouraging other males from touching their female or females.

Now this may seem like a very oppressive way for one sex to treat another, but within the construct of the mating game, it makes perfect sense for males to do this in order to increase their chances of any offspring being theirs, even if it is mostly a socially superficial and psychological behaviour. DNA testing, coupled with accessible and reliable contraception, may have decreased the need for marriage as a superficial tool to avoid becoming a cuckold male, but it will always be a very profitable tool for hierarchies in many other ways. Many do marry without jumping through the hoops set out by their hierarchies, but as they are less profitable for a hierarchy, these practices are not encouraged if they are outside of the control of their profitable laws.

In the mating game, romantic love is often sold by many as the main goal, rather than just a by-product of the reproduction process, but no matter where we may fall on the spectrum of romantic love for a mate, we often distort what love is. We fall in love for ourselves, as all love is arguably a selfish act, but many somehow see it as totally selfless or even a cure all for many things, and the desire to be loved is closely linked with our desire to belong and be special. Even although all love is selfish to varying degrees, we could define selfish love as our most base type, and selfless love as a more advanced form of love. If we take our common vengeful lovers as an example of selfish love, we can observe the superficiality of such proclaimed love, as they not only wish ill on those they say they love or loved, but actively harm them in order to manage the self within themselves. This is arguably an immature form of love that does not go beyond the self. A more mature love would not be limited to the self, but would genuinely and not superficially extend to the recipient of the love, and such a love does not harm those they love.

Despite many stories, songs and poems, love is time limited and is never enough, as what is love without understanding, respect, compassion or empathy. Within the mating game, misunderstanding is often the language of love between the sexes, as the level of meaning put on different things can vary greatly between any two people, never mind the sexes. Concepts such as “The one” are used to mask our lack of understanding of our psychology and the mating game. But as we use such concepts (as well as other more ridiculous retrospective ignorances like “love at first sight”) as tools to enhance or display our depth of love in order to encourage a stronger pairing, and in turn to give our offspring a better chance of survival, who is to say these things don’t hold meaning if they can contribute to our species continuation?

We could argue that it is the mating game that encourages us to favour our desire to belong over our desire to understand, as belonging encourages similar behaviours and beliefs, even if it does limit our desire to understand. This mass mimicry ensures we can attract a greater number of potential partners, as we are more attracted to those who are most similar to ourselves in behaviours, beliefs and level of understanding. Whether we use love to help or to harm, we will all suffer from it, no matter if we desperately seek it or do all we can to avoid it.

As hierarchies are predominantly male, the narratives of what is expected by other males and females comes from this small group of self-glorifying males, and of course these narratives benefits this small group. So both sexes are encouraged to serve and acquire status from this small group, but often in different ways. Males gain status by doing all the work the glorified males don’t want to do, and females gain status by aspiring to be with a glorified male. Thus, males are encouraged to value themselves by their work and females by who they have sex with. So just the usual labour and sex slaves. It is no surprise that most cultures of greed encourage young boys to fantasise about what they will work as, to earn their approval or status from their hierarchy, rather than serve their own interests and grow in line with their own values. While young girls are encouraged to fantasise about being swept away by a wealthy, high-status male, to live happily ever after in their ivory tower, looking down upon the less-thans, rather than fantasies about being swept away by the wit and charm of the local homeless guy, to live a happy, fulfilling life living off the land in a tent.

As we go from childhood to adulthood, males come to terms with their power to force others to their will, while females come to terms with their power to create other human beings and the male attention such an ability attracts. Within the context of sex, this equates to females using their power to choose who they wish to partner with, while our more fragile glorified males can override females’ power to force them into sex. This balance of sexual power plays out to varying degrees within all social hierarchies. The more sexually oppressive the group, the less choice females often have, while the less sexually oppressive groups give most females some choice to choose, at least within the context of their social conditioning, but within all hierarchal cultures, females are always encouraged to look for status-seeking males. We say most, as the practice of rape and coercion is always going to be an accepted behaviour within social hierarchies.

Males often tend to put a lot of effort into the lead-up to sex, while females often put more effort into what comes after sex. Arguably, this is due to the fact that males after sex are void of the burden of creating life, having fulfilled their role in the human creation process, while the female’s role has just begun. While females get on with the task of maintaining our existence, status-seeking males can get on with doing all they can to reduce the survival of many of the humans our females create. As females often give their lives to continue the species, while males often give their lives to reduce our populations, we often create a kind of arms race between the sexes that can be measured in our numbers. The balance of births and needless murders shows what sex is “winning” in any given time period within our cultures of wrongdoing.

Social hierarchies, from the poorest to the wealthiest, all engage in the sexual exploitation of predominantly women and children, by allowing a percentage of males to use wealth and status to buy immunity. Glorified males will always need less-thans as a resource to be exploited for sex, so ensuring plenty of less-thans is always very important to them. With the manufactured use of gross poverty, injustice, and inequality within even the wealthiest of populations, our more-than males ensure a plentiful supply of young, exploitable sex slaves.

By using their oppressive environments, many hierarchies have even convinced many within their populations to believe that reproduction is a practice that is only for those who can afford it, so the poor must struggle just for a basic existence to feed the greed of the few, while the rich can breed. This financial and psychological castration of those deemed unworthy of belonging to the species, may align with the ignorances of many who are mired in their delusions of elevated worth, but it does very little for our social cohesion, not to mention our genetic diversity.

The mating game is all about those little bundles of joy who grow up to be the newest set of thieves, users and abusers, rapists and murderers, as well as, of course, all the lovely people of the world who wish no harm on anyone. As a parent within our cultures of greed, it is common to spend our time trying to acquire wealth and status in order to share that wealth and status with our children, or just to put food in their bellies and a roof over their head.

However, as a child, we benefit more from a parent that gives us their time than one who gives their wealth (psychologically at least, if not socially). The first few years of life are where we are moulded the most, yet it is common for many to be unaware of the importance of this time. Mothers and fathers can be guilty of this, but fathers in particular have a habit of missing the importance of this time, mostly due to the fact that they must serve their masters will as a labour slave, or maybe believing the later years are more important in their children’s development.

We are all flawed, and our children can suffer for those flaws or hopefully learn from them, rather than be damaged by them. As parents, we are our children’s greatest teachers, as we are the ones who usually spend the most time with them in those early years. Talking and storytelling are important in passing on knowledge, but parents that can only teach with words will limit their influence on their child. All children love to be involved, so doing things together is often more important than any amount of words.

Parenting and social hierarchies have much in common, as they can both have the power to treat those under their rule with kindness or cruelty, but there is no greater cruelty than that experienced by a child at the hands of their parents (although, as children, we are more likely to experience cruelty if we have a step-parent). Threats are common from both to control behaviour, but this coercive approach always has its deficiencies. When we threaten others, their actions are begrudging, but when we inspire others, their actions are willing.

Having babies has changed somewhat over the years within the slow grind of social hierarchal progress. We no longer have too many glorified males sticking their urine-stained hands into pregnant women in order to drag their children out of them. We no longer have to lie to convince the families of women who die needlessly of infection, that it was some “god’s” plan that any newborn child that survived will grow up motherless. Ah! True advancement indeed.

Now we have advanced to having industries that lower our fertility and industries that serve to help us conceive with that lowered fertility. So, as having babies has become more difficult (with a lot of help from our glorified wrongdoers), it has become very profitable for these industries. IVF can be a great tool for many to have children, as long as they can afford it that is, but a growing industry in the world of baby making is surrogacy. In a culture of equality, surrogacy would arguably be an act of love or great kindness, but within social hierarchal cultures of greed, those who have been given more can exploit those who have been given less, even when it comes to creating more humans.

With surrogacy, more-than females don’t even have to endure the burden of maintaining the species, when they have their slaves to do it for them. Already, many females around the world are enslaved into surrogacy in order to spare more-than females the cost of creating life. This will no doubt become more common within our cultures of extreme inequality, and it would not go beyond the realm of possibility if we end up with cultures that only allow more-thans to reproduce, and less-than females to be used as the incubators for the more-thans children.

This is arguably a forerunner for when we are growing our genetically modified descendants in labs. No doubt there will be more attempts to produce a genetically obedient slave class to serve the more-than class, in an even more servile way than we already do. Most human behaviours are reduced to crimes within all social hierarchies, as an excuse for exploiting their populations, but when less-than females having children is a crime, we could argue that a great big asteroid hitting earth may be doing us all a favour.

As many of our groups are united by kin, our need to breed outside of our closest relatives would have played a huge role in uniting different groups and generating relationships of cooperation. Although with our status seekers, the practice of raping and pillaging other groups is something we may have always liked to dabble in too. Stealing females from other groups to inject some genetic diversity into their own, does serve a practical purpose, even if it is somewhat barbaric in nature over cooperation.

The practice of females stealing males for the same purposes is obviously more of a male fantasy. We are still stealing females and children to this day, in order to satisfy our status seekers’ base desires, so not much has changed on that front. No hierarchy is going to be honest and declare their desire to wrong so many, just so that they can have sex with whomever they wish, thus they mask their basic desires behind their lies, rituals, fictions, wealth, and power, in order to appear respectable. As appearing is the best they can hope for.

Sex can motivate our status-seeking males’ need for the humiliation rituals they are so fond of. With the modern combination of feminising males with chemicals in drugs and foods, as well as encouraging many to be anything but a male, we could argue this is just an exaggerated form of the de-masculinising practices that all male status-seeking animals engage in. With our copious use of chemicals turning male frogs into female frogs with Atrazine, there is more than likely a link to the feminising of human males within the same time period we have been exposed to these poisons. There are many species like ourselves that partake in status-seeking rituals that involve a male (or set of males) dominating another male (or set of males) in order to render them less of a threat to their monopoly on sexual access to females. So by feminising males, our glorified males get to lessen any threat to their dominance.

As many males are willing to go to extreme lengths to prevent other males from bearing children, this can be easily dismissed as mere rivalry for females and an attempt to ensure any offspring from the females they mate with belong to them. However, that would be to ignore the level of malice involved in many of our practices compared with other species. It would appear this behaviour, in part, comes from the status-seeking male’s idea of winning. By ensuring genetic descendants, there may be a sense of superiority or even victory over males they interpret as their competition. However, as we went over how closely related we all are in our first chapter, we are not quite as unique as we may think we are. By limiting our genetic diversity even further with the practices of status-seeking, we compound our genetic stunting.

We could look at a group that many call the SAN people of Africa as a good example of how more successful social equality is over social inequality when it comes to genetic diversity. These are people that arguably understand the importance of behaviours that avoid genetic stunting more than most or arguably any other group in existence today. By using social behaviours such as sharing and curtailing any kind of status-seeking, these groups of people have become the most enduring population of any other we know of.

It is interesting to note that no matter where we go in the world, when we are within a status free group or a group of equal status, most of us use the very same mocking of status-seeking behaviours that the SAN peoples use to maintain their equality of status. Many within groups of differing worth are unsurprisingly encouraged by status seekers to perceive the behaviour of mocking status seekers as bad in some way, while the pandering to such nonsense is elevated to some kind of social value. As the most genetically diverse people on the planet, the SAN have a huge advantage in dealing with disease over most other groups, due to the genetic bottlenecks our social hierarchies are so fond of causing with their combination of inequality, injustice, disease, war, genocide and famine.

While the rest of us have lost half of our genetic diversity over the last 150,000 years, the SAN have avoided the same fate, perhaps due to their more benevolent behaviours. The behaviours social hierarchies encourage in using social status for sex to reduce the genetic diversity of their populations are not valued by the SAN. Another behaviour social hierarchal group’s use to restrict their genetic diversity, is by declaring their desire to not dilute their blood with humans they perceive as less-thans.

Within groups that value equality, there is no greed of a few to kill for, fewer lies to feed paranoia, fewer wrongs and wrongdoers to be glorified and less need to demonise or hate those who do no wrong, making war and famine easier to avoid. Many may consider the SAN people to be less advanced, and of course, in some ways they are, but it depends on the perspective we are viewing each culture from. From the perspective of technology, comforts and wealth (as defined by our status seekers), a typical modern social hierarchy is more advanced, but from the perspective of freedoms, equality and community, the SAN are arguably far more advanced.

Even if we examine famine between such groups, hunter-gatherer groups are less likely to go hungry than hierarchal farming groups, as they are not reliant on mono crops. Social hierarchies need farms and farmers in order to control the food of the populations they wish to lord over, so by making people dependant on the food they control, they can enslave any population to their will. Hunter-gatherers are a problem for social hierarchies as they rely on themselves to put food in their bellies, so they can’t be controlled in the same way.

The idea that hunter-gatherers saw what a great idea farming was and abandoned their way of life, maybe far-fetched, as even our hierarchies histories shows the armies that farmers produced were used to kill any hunter-gatherers opposing their land grabs. So if there was any dramatic switch from hunter-gatherer to farmer, it is more likely (in part at least) to have been a genocidal one, rather than an enlightening one for many groups. After all, what is enlightening about going from a community that shares highly nutritious foods among everyone, to communities that hoard the most nutritious foods for a glorified few, while feeding most low nutritious grasses and starving them?

Do the SAN people value social equality because of their genetic diversity, or is their genetic diversity a result of social equality? Perhaps the recognition of ourselves existing in others, in a genetic or any other form, is enough for us to respect those around us, but for our more-thans that see themselves as so different from others, harming and murdering others becomes easier with superficial differing respect. The idea that social equality creates more genetic diversity is a valid one, as more males would contribute to the gene pool if all are socially equal, as opposed to a social hierarchy that encourages many females to procreate with males who have been bestowed with some form of social status.

We just have to look at our history to see how a few males, using social status, can force thousands of females to procreate with them and cause a dip in genetic diversity among their populations, not just in their own time but for future generations. When we have hundreds or even thousands of siblings within a region, and thus make incest far more likely, a high rate of duplicate ancestry is almost unavoidable. From a male’s perspective, some may see this as success, as they have ensured their genes stay in circulation for some time and guaranteed that preciously fragile male title of legacy that females take for granted. But let’s be honest, we don’t need to understand the existence of genes or genetic diversity to work out any male’s motivations.

The Conquerors Corrupt Chronicles

As much as sex plays a huge part in our story, we have probably covered it enough to move on from it. So we will end our sex wars on the subject of time. As time itself is monopolised by our serial-monopolist, it is interesting that the male 7 day cycle of peak testosterone and sperm is still represented in our weeks. However, the female 28 day cycle of ovulation that mimics the 13 moons a year is no longer represented in our months. Of course, these cycles are averages, but we know our calendar has been heavily tampered with by our more malicious hierarchies. Could this be a deliberately sexist structure or just another coincidence?

With the 28 days, 13 months a year calendar, with an additional New Year’s Day, it is far more efficient and predictable structure than the mess we have today. Even the beginning and end of the year has been altered. Why would anyone define a new year as starting in the beginning of winter (our Dec 21st)? When defining the seasons, we still do it in the order of Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter. Spring (around our current March the 20th) is the obvious New Year, and with Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec meaning 7, 8, 9, and 10 respectively, there has clearly been 3 additional months after this to represent the rest of the year till Spring. Perhaps they call April the 1st “Fools Day” as a way to mock those not within the “Special Peoples” group, who know what our year should be. As this is the standard of intellect that many status seekers suffer from.

With time itself enduring the whitewashing of our history from our prolific lairs, we can understand the depth of malice our deluded more-than are capable of. The number 13 itself appears to be part of this whitewashing that began around the 1800’s (surprise, surprise). To this day many are convinced that 13 is bad in some way, with our masters industries towing the line by emitting 13 from the numbering, this lie can be seen throughout our time-thief’s cults. Building and hotel floors and rooms, airplanes seats and rows, airport gates, streets and houses, as well as many sports, to name but a few, have all aligned themselves to discriminate against our natural number of months. Perhaps the woeful way that maths is taught in these cultures, explains why those who suffer from 13iphobia have no problem using, sitting on or walking down the 13th anything when there is a 14 sticker on it.

Many of our groups have or had a culture of designating the oral history of their group to certain individuals, who would be tasked with informing their group members about the stories of their history. They would pass this knowledge down to each generation in order to fulfil the desire of future generations to know their history. If we gained the historical knowledge of the oldest person we know or knew, who gained their knowledge of the oldest person they knew, and so on, our knowledge would go far beyond our own time. But of course, there are flaws to oral history, not to mention our status seekers’ love of genocide, which means we consistently wipe out much of our own story to have it replaced with the ignorant egocentric dogma of a social hierarchy.

Knowledge of the past allows us to see what is coming long before it arrives, while ignorance of it shocks us at the inevitable. A population that does not know its history, never mind human history, is much more likely to fall for the lies and exploitative tactics that social hierarchies repeat over many generations, in order to maintain the master/slave dynamic. Wiping out the story of a conquered people is often important, as allowing their history to live on often exposes the lies of righteousness our glorified wrongdoers try to sell.

Anyone wishing to understand our true history over the last couple of hundred years alone would learn much from knowing the activities, profits and losses of the groups that hide behind corporations that manipulate public narratives for their own gain, by monopolising our mediums of exchange. But instead, many adopt the lies these very people sell about the events of their time as well as the past. Wrongdoing will always be a very profitable and glorified business, when most buy a wrong that is sold as a right, and a right that is sold as a wrong.

Modern history is much about the rising and falling of our status seekers’ fictions in the form of empires or civilizations. As our hate-filled cults spend their time trying to dominate and destroy one another, in a bid to wipe their competitors off of their maps. The consequences of such profound losses, just so a few can monopolise human exploitation, are often ignored or played down in favour of the glory of the few that benefit the most from the apocalyptic nature of social hierarchies. When we look beyond the ramblings of the self-glorifying few, our story is vastly more remarkable than all the lies ever told.

We should embrace our history and learn from it, but our social hierarchies hide from it, as well they should. Our hierarchy’s versions of history vary greatly, as bulldozing themselves into it as a glorified part always gets in the way of reality. Even when it comes to our total history, they can’t help but impose their ignorances and narratives onto it. Most of modern-day known human history does not go much beyond 4000 years ago and stops dead after earths last great cataclysm of over 11,000 years ago. So let’s examine the common version of what is told as our story, setting aside the obviously male fabricated gods creating humans versions, which gains value with those of us that struggle with coming to terms with our mortal fragility, and those who like to manipulate them.

The largely accepted modern-day version of our story goes somewhat like so. From our evolutional conception (today's modern humans), we go straight into the Stone Age, where we stay for one to eight hundred thousand years (an ever-changing figure depending on who is telling the story). In all this time, we do very little apparently, until just a few thousand years ago, when we get the birth of our great and glorious cultures (or civilization as many prefer to call it), that rise out of farming for food. From here, we are “led” by the great and the glorious more-thans, into the wonderfully advanced world of attaching our worth to fictions that are controlled by a few, to produce the grand masters/slave cultures that we still use to this day.

Now, this highly ignorant version of our story serves the narratives of hierarchies very well, as they must always convince as many of their slaves that their authority comes from their superiority, and not from the efforts of those they enslave. So the narratives of an ever-advancing culture, where most are guided by the greatness of their masters, fit well into the more-than/less-than cultures that serve the fantasies of our status seekers. What is with the long Stone Age, you may ask? Not to knock on stone, as anyone who has worked with stone knows, it can be of great use and takes great skill to work on, it is certainly more difficult to work on than wood is. Whatever happened to the Wood Age? Where did it go? Perhaps it got too much stick. (Ah, we’ll keep that one in).

The mere idea of ancient cultures that were more developed beyond the cartoonish Stone Age caveman causes a few problems for our glorified wrongdoers. For a start, it forces the recognition of the fragility of our groups over time in comparison to nature’s powers, and this undermines the lies used to encourage the obedience of a population to the greatness and superiority of their hierarchies in ensuring their security. Although masters telling their slaves whom they use, abuse, and terrorise at will, that they care for their safety, is hilarious to all but those ignorant of their nature.

Selling the idea of an ever-increasing level of development is common for such groups, as it helps them appear competent in progressing in some way, despite them usually devolving into more extreme levels of inequality and injustice. Not to mention their common practice of destroying each other to gain some elevated worth, so anything that sways from this concept is normally ignored. Then of course, there are their very recent gods that are used in an attempt to legitimise our wrongdoers’ wrongs, which are sold as proof of our status seekers divine authority over others. If the old gods of our ancestors died out with them, then the idea of their slaves even thinking about this concept relating to their own gods may lead to a few too many contented slaves questioning too much for their hierarchies liking.

The idea that we were only capable of developing a large population or civilization just a few thousand years ago, is a little far-fetched. This is often the time period that is claimed by our cultures of liars, where we developed large scale agriculture for the first time. Now, let us for a second pretend that this was true. If we have an abundance of resources, as well as animals to hunt and plants to forage, we can easily accumulate an overabundance of food to grow a large population.

Granted, these types of environments may be rare, especially from today’s perspective, but not impossible. It may be difficult for many within our time (that celebrates the mismanagement and destruction of our environments and natural resources, just to enrich a few) to imagine our world having lands, rivers and seas that are teeming with highly nutritious animals and plants, but we have the word paradise for a reason. With a population that is capable of managing and sharing their resources in a highly efficient manner, large scale groups are more than possible.

The idea of a gradually continuing rate of development is also ridiculous, especially for those who can observe the opposite happening within their own time. We have developed our knowledge and technologies only to lose them and rediscover them later. We can only guess what we have lost to time (for now, anyway). There is abundant evidence that tells us that the knowledge of our ancestors has been lost to many of their descendants, but who is to say how often this has occurred in the realm of human history. There is all likelihood that much of the knowledge of our time will be lost to our descendants, in favour of the dogma of a future social hierarchy.

The Stone Age Cycle

Let’s take a look at the last 150,000 years or so of our existence to examine reasons for possible advance and decline cycles in our development. In that time, there have been many global events that would have had huge consequences for life on our planet, and there will be many more, as the great year cycle alone appears to produce cataclysms with astonishing regularity. A great year may sound like a summer of fun in our youth, but astronomically speaking, the term “Great Year” describes the circular path in space that our tilted polar axis takes to complete a full circle.

This circle takes roughly 25,000 years (give or take a millennium or so). So, that leaves the obvious question of what’s going on with these cycle points to cause this. Understanding this could go a long way in explaining why human cultures are not as advanced as they could be. Maybe we just don’t get enough time to advance beyond the social hierarchal stage of human grouping, as we have our populations decimated on a regular basis by earths constant cataclysms, and must start from scratch in rebuilding and reacquiring lost knowledge all over again.

Perhaps we now just find ourselves between events that will wipe out our civilisations, just as they have done many times before. A cycle of hierarchal cultures that spend their time exploiting the majority of our populations for labour and sex, just to serve a few, will always struggle to advance at the same rate as a culture that uses everyone’s true worth and intelligence to serve us all. If we are doomed to maintain social hierarchies, then this could be the cost of them.

Cultures that only serve the few and are built on lies will not unite within times of extreme crisis, and why should they? The glorified few of today’s world have their caves or bunkers full to the brim with resources, to ensure they are the ones who survive such events, so that they can become the cavemen’s masters in the next cycle. Perhaps this is why many believe we stayed in the Stone Age for so long, because the only survivors of each cycle were the people who hid in caves, and the only things that were left standing were made of stone.

We may find it hard to understand the level of devastation our volatile planet exposes us to when we live within a time of relative calm, but let’s think about how long it would take to wipe out all traces of our existence on this planet. Well, on the surface of it at least. We would struggle to see much of our existence after 10,000 years, but after 25,000 years, we would struggle to know we were here at all. So within one great year, everything we have made that exists today could be long gone, except maybe the stone we used. Perhaps our future civilisations will refer to our time as the Stone Age too, because stone is all that ever remains.

Let’s look forward 30,000 years from now. In that time, we shall experience 3, or at least 2 major cataclysmic events, as we are near the 12.5k event stage of the cycle that will devastate our populations around the world. Especially if we do not understand or prepare for them. Perhaps if we could jump in a time machine to the times just before each event, we would be confronted with cultures similar to our own, where they have little to no knowledge of their history, and they are instead filled with stories that present their hierarchies as the most advanced in human history, just as ours do today.

Outwith our regular great year cycles of devastation, there are many other ways we can have our populations drastically reduced or even wiped out completely. Examining our past events can give us a clue about our future, and may make our never-ending Stone Age sound rather appealing. We have had massive temperature drops killing up to 86% of all life, a decrease in our oceans’ oxygen killing 65% of aquatic life and volcanic gases destroying the ozone layer killing 96% of all life on our planet, to name but a few of these events.

We could also face destruction from asteroid or meteor impacts, solar flares and gamma ray bursts. Pole shifts are common, where the north becomes the south and vice versa. These sudden large pole shift could cause mass catastrophe with huge worldwide floods and tectonic shifts. And during these events of switching, our magnetic field can become distorted and fail to protect us from solar rays.

There is even the possibility of earth losing its magnetic field, as there is evidence that earth has come close in the past to losing it. Around 565 million years ago, it became so weak earth almost lost it completely before convection (its inner electrical generator) kicked in, but there is the theory that this event led to the explosion of diverse life on earth, so swings and roundabouts. How does impending doom lead to an abundance of life forms? Well, the theory goes that when the magnetic field became weak, Earth was bombarded with a lot more radiation, and as there was not a lot of factor 3000 kicking about at the time, this led to more frequent mutations in the life forms exposed to it. This in turn would create a lot more genetic diversity that may have kick-started the Cambrian explosion.

So perhaps radiated mutant genes are not all bad, as good can come from bad, just as bad can come from good. Although we should probably hold off on booking a holiday to Sellafield, Chernobyl, Fukushima or the Yucca mountains for the time being. These are just some of the known cycles Earth goes through from time to time, and we can only imagine the ones we know nothing about yet, but maybe we don’t get so lucky if we are still around for the next one. No social hierarchy is equipped to deal with such events to any degree of efficiency, well, not as far as the survival of the groups they lord over is concerned anyway. They will react the way they always react to anything, in thinking only of themselves and their own interests at the cost of their less-thans.

Despite many parts of today’s world being overly concerned with the global warming industry’s profit margins, we should also consider the possibility of a frozen earth, as our planet has experienced just that on more than one occasion, and, quite frankly, makes global warming sound wonderful. Around 716 and 635 million years ago, during the Cryogenian period of our planets past, living on Earth would have been a challenge too far for us. When we consider that these global ice ages lasted around 50 and 15 million years respectively, it’s not exactly something to be waited out in a bunker.

Surviving 50 million years of ice is a tough ask for most species, but there are obviously a few that are hardy and small enough for the task. Although that may seem like a walk in the park compared with the 300 million year ice earth we call the Huronian glaciation. While our glorified wrongdoers cause more pollution than any other group of human beings, with their war machines’ endless pursuit of genocides, they have convinced many of their slaves that a cow’s fart or using a plastic product that they themselves profit from manufacturing is a bigger threat to the planet than their own actions. Our planet will be fine no matter how much we feed the greed of a few, and we may destroy many of our environments in doing so, but our planet will recover in time. We, on the other hand, might be a different story.

Just for a laugh, let’s explore some possible future scenarios in how our groups would deal with the inevitable oncoming cataclysmic events our planet experiences periodically, as we hurtle through the universe on the spaceship we call earth. The structure of our social groups may not matter a jot for some events, but could play a huge role in how we handle others.

The one very real possibility is that we maintain the master/slave cultures that are built on exploitation and lies, and as far as an effective response to global dangers is concerned, these social systems are rather useless, as they are unstable by nature and are doomed to constant conflict in order to maintain their gross injustice and inequality. With competing hierarchies, there is little chance of the unity required to deal with mass events effectively, and even if some unity could be achieved, it would still have to contend with the endless differing interests from the factions that these systems create.

A second, less likely possibility is that we go down the egalitarian route, where all have the opportunity to contribute in many different ways to create vastly more possibilities for solutions. This may seem highly unlikely, but arguably the most effective of any group structure when dealing with threats to our very survival. If every human on the planet had access to honest and true information and knowledge, ignorances would be less of a hindrance as they are within social hierarchies.

Therefore, with so many minds being used in creating solutions to problems, it would be a matter of when, not if, many of our problems are solved. Now, as lovely as that one sounds, sadly, one of the most likely scenarios we end up with is where we have a hierarchy that has become so powerful and dominant that they end up creating a world under their total control, where there is not even a remote chance that they could be threatened by those they dominate.

A planet of slaves where everyone does what they are told or face greater levels of inequality, injustice or death (the status quo on steroids then really), would always result in a glorified few hiding behind the enforced sacrifice of the many. A practice that we are all too familiar with. There are many paths our social groups could take, but even if all of those paths lead to extinction when any of the next big cataclysmic events hits, extinction is an inevitability for almost every large multicellular species. So who are we to say it is a bad thing? Maybe the void we leave behind can be filled with a more intelligent life form that would make the most of their time in paradise. However, as we have survived all the ones we have faced so far, it is more likely that for the majority of these events, we just have a mass reduction in population, leaving the survivors to form their own hierarchies in the aftermath.

Our modern doomsday folk that sell the idea of climate change Armageddon to enrich themselves may not want those who feed their greed to acknowledge this, but global temperatures have and will always fluctuate. This is nothing new, but using this on a global scale as an excuse to justify the many wrongs social hierarchies must commit in order to maintain their elevated worth may well be. When our planet’s temperature rises significantly, there has no doubt been a mass migration from the equator, just as there has no doubt been mass migration towards the equator when the temperature drops significantly.

With social hierarchies being our more common form of groups, this would surely have been met with the same attitude that today’s wrongdoing worshippers have. We can imagine the conflict that would ensue when large groups of people have no choice but to leave their home and try to settle in a more hospitable environment, which are already occupied with status seekers. With our glorified wrongdoers having to divide our populations, it is inevitable that we would lack the cohesion, understanding and compassion that would be required to address such a problem without the usual unjust and violent outcomes. The chances of working together to solve problems with a logical and reasonable solution that is best for all, instead of a glorified few, is highly unlikely.

The Milankovitch cycles, which basically explains Earths differing proximity and angles to the sun, suggest we should have been cooling instead of warming over the last 9,000 years. If we look at Earths average temperatures over the last 500 million years, then that is exactly what we see, as we are in one of the coolest periods of that time. Now, if many believe we are the reason for any warming with our activities, we could argue we are doing ourselves a favour in avoiding global cooling.

We must bear in mind that no matter if our planet was heading towards becoming a ball of ice or a ball of fire, our social hierarchies would always be using it as just another tool of exploitation, as this is what they do. Selling the latest doomsday scenario of climate change helps to instil fear into their slave classes and excuse their use of climate weapons, and thus encourages a dependency in many to bow to their masters’ will in order to gain salvation. The endless well-funded fearmongers that profit from pretending to address any real and imaginary dangers are just par for the course within our cultures of deceit.

It was not so long ago (the late 1970s) that we had the usual puppetry of self-proclaimed experts, predicting that there was an ice age on the way to freeze us all, and this would entice mass migration as we all run to the equator to avoid our doom. However, when temperatures began to rise slightly, our self-proclaimed experts had to think up another way to cash in on their fearmongering, so they swung the other way to declare that global warming was going to see us all burn. As the planet did not warm up enough or turn into a ball of fire and ash, while even showing signs of cooling again, our glorified wrongdoers have had to settle on the terrifying threat of “climate change” to scare people into valuing exaggerated or imaginary threats over the very real threats that the master classes pose to their lives.

As our glorified wrongdoers try to promote carbon dioxide to public enemy number one, despite our hierarchies killing vastly more people than all the energy used or all the cows’ farts in the world, they rarely speak of how earth has got greener lately, with vastly more plants growing to take advantage of the extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And more plants mean more oxygen, so not all bad, eh! Life on earth thrived during the Cambrian period when CO₂ levels where around 15 times higher than today. It turns out carbon life forms love carbon, who knew? CO₂ also aids crop yields, so perhaps we should be taking advantage of this instead of saturating our crops in poisonous chemicals.

Human beings (or their gods) played no part in our planet’s creation or in making it a paradise for life to flourish. We may contribute to making this paradise less inviting, but larger forces than ourselves will “destroy” or “save the planet” without any help from us, regardless of how much wealth we funnel into the hands of a few. Despite our hierarchies actions and the status seekers who prop them up, we are capable of understanding ways we can manipulate our environments to suit our need without destroying our environments.

With weapons or tools (every tool is a weapon for our glorified wrongdoers) that can manipulate our climates, atmosphere and seismic activity, our masters can sell the doomsday idea of climate change as a way to cause wildfires, floods, earthquakes and tsunamis in the regions of our planet that are disobeying or even worse, challenging our global masters, void of much condemnation. Environmental genocide is an easier sell for hierarchies to their populations than the transparently overused self-serving lie of “spreading democracy” that is currently used to rob and murder millions.

What is now becoming an ever more parroted phrase by the lying industries of “extreme weather”, as opposed to the more honest and old-fashioned “weather”, is a far more palatable way of encouraging their slaves to bow to their masters’ will than any truth. The ability to change periodically is a defining feature of weather, but hierarchies selling the nature of something as proof of a lie, is a practice they don’t limit to the weather.

If we look at European hierarchies lies of relatively recent history, where they like to insist that the American and Australian continents were “discovered” by them just a few hundred years ago, many believe this despite many other groups and civilizations coming and going. This sounds so ridiculous to even the least curious of minds, yet such lies are still told to this day. However, such lies are more a sign of these hierarchies trying to maintain their perceptions of superiority among their slaves, and something to hide their genocides behind, than any attempt to record reality.

For our average social hierarchy, controlling, maintaining and expanding their bordering territories is enough to keep them busy, plus hierarchies as a rule never prioritise understanding the world they live in over satisfying their more basic needs. So when knowledge of these continents eventually reached the glorified ignorant minds of Europe, their hierarchies must come up with more lies to justify the lies they had already told their populations previously, in order to maintain the lies of superiority and divine authority, as who is going to glorify idiots that don’t know much about the planet they live on…well, OK, maybe many. So we endure lies of how great and glorious Europeans discovered these continents all by themselves.

Did they also “discover” populations of natives in those lands? Sure, there were already people living there for thousands of years, but that can all be explained by declaring those people as less than human, so they don’t really count. That and the fact that the sheer number of people that are required to be murdered in order to steal lands and resources from others, plays a role in the need to create lies of a sparsely populated land that the glorified group populated as there were few or no people there, in order to hide their genocides and land grabs behind. Hierarchal history swipes huge chunks off our story, but as they rarely admit to their own ignorances or wrongdoings, thy must always come up with lies in an attempt to hide the truth of what they are from their obedient slaves.

The Keepers of Lies

Most “historians”, as they like to call themselves, gain a degree of worth within their social hierarchy because they are obedient to them, and in order to gain worth within any such group, we must adopt or at least pretend to adopt the ignorances of that group. Social hierarchies often harm anyone giving an accurate account of their actions, so they are only going to bestow their status on those who champion the lies and narratives they wish to sell. Therefore, as most “respected” historians must adopt the ignorances of their hierarchy, they are likely to be ignorant to the realities of their own time, as they must adhere to their hierarchy’s narratives. And anyone ignorant of their own time is unlikely to be accurate about a time in which they did not exist.

The Covid-19 genocide is a good modern example of how many who live through a time period, can have little to no clue about the realities of their time and instead choose to believe the lies their hierarchies sell them, despite all logic and reason. No doubt, when all who lived through this period of time are long gone, our glorified wrongdoers’ history books will be selling their lies about how a naturally occurring pathogen was effectively conquered by the incredibly selfless work of our champions of greed.

The truth about how pathogens were created in order to inflict harm to feed the greed of a few, promote digital MOE usage and imprisoning most of the planet, while stripping many of their bodily autonomy to inject them with a cocktail of harmful drugs that lead to the harming and deaths of many, is unlikely to be what anyone aspiring to attain social worth will be reciting in order to pass any history exam.

One example of how our hierarchies pseudo-historians must march to the same beat from their hierarchies drum of lies, in order to gain the wealth and status they desire, is their comical lies in explaining the hundreds of pyramids we have all around the planet. Selling pyramids as tombs of more-thans, despite never finding a body in any of them, requires a level of malice that all social hierarchies have in abundance. The most obvious or likely explanation of them being used for some kind of energy and/or to purify water makes the most sense for any large population, but as our modern hierarchies are relative newcomers to the fields of energy and water purification, we can understand their reluctance to acknowledge any such ability in those they sell as inferior.

Of all the pyramids around the world, the ones in Egypt are arguably the most well-known, and Egyptians are often credited with building them by our peddlers of lies, even though the issue of their existence all around the world kind of hinders such a narrative. Luckily for our glorified liars, most populations that receive their anti-education to limit the use of basic logic don’t ask too many questions.

The fact that the Egyptians (as well as other groups around the world that are credited with the construction of our pyramids), never claimed to have built them, as they existed long before they ever came along, always seems to be a taboo subject among our glorified liars. The lies of our pyramids are, of course, manufactured to align our past with the narratives of our hierarchies’ versions of history. A practice they will always value.

Historians within a social hierarchy face the same social dynamics as anyone in any other field, so they must become mimics to attain wealth and status or value the truth and face belittlement. As status seekers require others to elevate their worth, and their belongers or followers also gain a degree of social elevation from their connection to more-thans and their lies and fictions, we can understand why there will always be many willing to play the roles of puppet influencers. By glorifying anything we connect ourselves to, we are attempting to glorify ourselves to a degree in the process.

Let’s use our status seekers gods as an example, and this is not to pick on such an obvious lie or those who value such lies, but merely as it is a very common example of this practice, though we could replace it with many other lies. Anyway, most who champion the lies of “their” god will obviously glorify this god above all other gods in a bid to elevate themselves above others. This exposes the status seeker in most of us, as even the lowliest of followers try to attach themselves to anything that is commonly perceived as more-than. Try finding any status seekers that think their god is the worst god of all the countless gods we have created. Good luck with that.

If social hierarchy’s history books were even close to the truth, then those who ponder over them may have a chance of learning from history, but they are so laden with lies that they often serve little value other than entertainment. However, that’s the point of these altered histories, to ensure few of their slaves learn from history in order to aid our glorified wrongdoers longevity and control. Social hierarchies produce the same results they always produce, so the idea of any population learning this from history has to be managed, in order to convince a population to value the lies that maintain and even glorify the master/slave cultures that are inflicted upon them.

Our history and present may be littered with wrongdoing, and wrongs will always be glorified by social hierarchies, but we should also recognise that it is also teeming with all the things that are truly worth valuing. Like the endless acts of kindness, love, compassion and understanding that we can all appreciate, yet go unrecorded by those that monopolise our histories. Acts of courage, bravery and righteousness are always on display every day by those declared as less-than, despite the overwhelming pressure social hierarchies use to discourage such behaviour. Few of these acts may find themselves in any social hierarchy’s history books where villains are promoted to heroes and heroes demoted to villains, and where rights are interpreted as wrongs and vice versa, but that does not make them any less real.

Social hierarchies often sell their history as a chain of great achievements that were due to their superiority or greatness. They like to take the credit for anything and everything that holds any kind of value, while ignoring the people who were the ones who attained any valued achievements. Hierarchies like to sell the idea that their empires are built by their glorious few, who are always so much more than most, but the reality is that all of their empires are built by their slaves. They omit their wrongdoings and pass them on to others whenever they cannot be struck from history.

Their genocides are denied, glorified, forgotten or transferred onto others, while endlessly reciting any committed by their competitors, even though their stench of hypocrisy can never be masked by any amount of lies. Human history is full of peaks and troughs, and not the constant progressive advancement that social hierarchies try to sell it as in order to sell themselves as the peak of human development. This lie is tarnished at the mere idea that a previous social group could have been more advanced in knowledge, technology and medicine or in any way whatsoever.

As many within our social hierarchal populations value many lies in regards to our history, we get many who value different versions of history from different hierarchies, yet few hierarchies are interested in the true version. Let’s take one modern example of how many of the slave nations around the world are conditioned to believe their masters lies and narratives. There are many to choose from, but in the spirit of rebellion towards the orgy of wrongdoing our social hierarchies glorify, we shall cast an eye over the false perceptions that are sold by many about Haiti as some kind of backwards nation that is ripe with poverty, because it is riddled with corruption and political incompetence (as if those making the claim are not).

The Haitian rebellion around 1800, is, for some, regarded as the only successful slave revolt in known human history (though a somewhat misleading accolade), but with the invasion of our medium of exchange monopolists’ minions in 1915, they would pay the price for resisting their masters will. As we know, our status seekers can be a vindictive and petty bunch, so Haiti has been one of the most oppressed countries in the Americas, and stripped of its wealth as an example of what happens to slaves who refuse to feed the greed of a few.

Despite its title as the only successful slave rebellion (ignoring the absurdity of such a claim for a moment), we must bear in mind that even a population of slaves will more often than not create their own social hierarchy of masters and slaves. Haiti is a good example of the way in which our hierarchal moral hypocrites treat those who attempt to be free from the slavery orchestrated by those who control our mediums of exchange.

The island they share with the Dominican Republic shows the stark contrast in how gross corruption and obedience to the greed of a few is rewarded and disobedience is punished. A practice echoed throughout our present and past. The descendants of slaves that populate Haiti may be paying the price for their ancestors’ desire to be free from bondage for a very long time, if our global glorified wrongdoers maintain their stranglehold over so many of us. Human history is full of slave revolts, and while the more ignorant may put these revolts down to disorder or disobedience, they are inevitable, as any group of people at the wrong end of our glorified wrongdoers acts, are entitled to enact justice upon those who wrong them, no matter how many people our wrongdoers may reward or convince to demonise their victims by calling them names such as savages, barbarians, uncivilized or terrorists and the like.

For those of us who don’t come to understand the realities of social hierarchies until adulthood or even late adulthood, if at all, it can be a common practice for many to perceive the past as somehow less corrupt or less malicious than their present. The good old days when people were more respectable, and leaders were real men… blah… blah... blah, can be an ignorance trap many of us fall into, especially if we believe our glorified wrongdoers versions of history and the ones that were sold to the generations that came before us.

This ignorance says more about our own perceptions than it does about our past. Social hierarchies are always the same in that they allow as many as is needed to commit their self-serving wrongs free from accountability. This always leads to corruption and wrongdoing being normalized throughout our history, just as it is in today’s world, and always will be when the greed of a few is the priority of any human group.

All social hierarchies are brimming with the vain and deluded, who fool themselves into believing in the importance of whether they, or their caricatures, are remembered by one generation or more. To be remembered by others after we die is something that happens to most, if not all of us, to some degree, but no memory outlasts time, no matter how many statues we make of ourselves. Many may wish to be part of history, but what they often mean is they wish to be part of their glorified wrongdoer’s history, as we all become part of our story, whether a glorified few recognise it or not. But not all have any desire to join the many fictions within such glorified mythical stories. Whether we believe all, some or none of the stories of our past, we all live in the shadows of lies and truths that those who came before us valued.

Well, hopefully we have touched on enough reasons and examples of how the truth and our story is constantly under attack from our status seekers, who need to lie about everything to achieve their goal of elevated worth. In every part of the world today, more of the same type of lies are added to our story each day, and as long as we are governed by status seekers, the lies will never stop. However, with our modern tools giving us more access to our own true history, many have less need for the works of fiction their glorified wrongdoers have always sold to their slaves.

Our present is a reflection of our history and our future, with the same acts played out over and over again, the only difference being the time, place and individuals involved in the exact same processes of behaviour. If we could go to different places at different points in time, we would encounter the very same characteristics in people with slightly different faces, displaying the very same behaviours. We are what we are, and just like any life form, we are rather predictable.

Chapter 5

Social Hierarchies - The Power of Hate

The desire to be special infects us all (some more than others), but when we wallow in this desire, we are capable of losing touch with reality. This can cause us to overinflate our own worth, and in turn devalue the worth of others we share our time with. To grade all humans based on the value they bring to a small percentage of people within a large group, may be insane to many of us, unless we find ourselves as part of this overvalued minority, but whether we value this nonsense in return for the possibility to be seen as more-than in the eyes of others or not, we must all navigate through such groups that do.

Those of us who wish to be seen as more-than must climb over others to do so. Hence, why hierarchies are always reducing their fellow humans to slaves to be positioned under them. So what are the advantages of glorifying a few at the cost of everyone else? Hmm, well, apart from allowing a few of us to live like gods, there are none for the vast majority. What are the disadvantages? Way too many to cram into one book (but let’s have a go).

Wrongdoing is essential in creating and maintaining social hierarchies, so in order to value them, we must either be ignorant of their prolific wrongdoing, hence ignorant populations are a must, or we value the wrongs they commit, hence the reason for social status to differentiate between the worth of the wrongdoers committing the same wrong.

Few of us will have the joy of finding ourselves growing up in a society free of social status and its differing worth, so perhaps we can at least understand why many come to value the very things that cause so much wrongdoing. Social status is a crippling disease most of our cultures suffer from, and with it infecting more than ever before, there are no signs of a cure anytime soon. As we are encouraged to excuse wrongdoing when those wrongs serve the interests of an elevated few, and with wrongdoing being glorified by so many around us, we can understand why we become so accustomed to causing each other harm. As social hierarchies are born from and maintained by force, in order to glorify those who cause much of this harm, we often vilify all those they harm in order to raise the value of the wrongdoers and their acts. This is why social hierarchies always need an enemy, whether it is individuals, subgroups or other hierarchies within or outwith their own.

The constant need to vilify others to glorify themselves and their actions never ends. We rarely hear anything other than how great, glorious and wonderful our hierarchies are from the mouths of those who are a valued part of them, and if we do hear any truths from individuals within them, they tend not to remain part of them for very long. On this basis alone, many instinctively know social hierarchies cannot be trusted due to the consistency of their wrongdoing, and of course, there is never a shortage of evidence to verify the depth of deceit and wrongdoing they engage in. So let us begin with the kindest of cruelties that are always on offer from the gross wrongdoers who prefer to call themselves leaders.

Why the obsession with lies? Such a tricky one. Well, we can’t glorify gross inequality and injustice with the truth, so lies are a must. The truth is the enemy of all social hierarchies; they are at war with it every day. With their political propagandists and others that masquerade as journalists and experts in different fields (being used to help sell the lies required to tolerate gross wrongdoing and differing worth), the truth is quickly transformed by their lies in the hope that their lies become their truth to their slaves.

This allows the delusions of more-thans to be forced upon the realities of their less-thans. If hierarchies were honest and the populations that are dominated by them clearly understood them for the self-glorifying wrongdoing parasites that they are, as well as recognise the level of malice they display on a regular basis, their slave armies would be constantly on high alert to the threat of their slaves rebelling. In fact, armies are regularly used to discourage slaves breaking from their bondage, but this is always more expensive than selling a few lies. So an honest social hierarchy will forever be a myth, only valued among manipulators and idiots.

Inefficiency in all fields (other than wrongdoing) is a standard practice of these cultures of greed, as even with contented slaves, hierarchies can never tap into the true potential of any population that is hamstrung by oppression and lies. Social status is the driving force used to give lies value, and as social status is linked to wealth, the lies of the rich have more value than the truths of the poor. Or the lies of those with high social status will be seen as true, while the truths of those with low social status will be seen as lies (at least in the minds of those who value the ignorance of differing worth).

Fictions are one of the main products of all social hierarchies, as fictions can bend to the will of a few much easier than reality, and few slaves are free from them. When a population has adopted the array of fictions their hierarchy imposes upon them, many can spend an eternity arguing over such fictions. However, this is ideal for any hierarchy, as populations that are mired in fictions will largely avoid the realities of their group structures.

Rituals are a great way of taking the ridiculous seriously. These ostentatious displays normally occur on a regular basis to reinforce lies and show the wealth and dominance of the hierarchy. Social hierarchies are of course, designed to work for the few at the cost of the many, so hierarchies have to constantly balance between fictions and force to convince their slaves to value their servitude. Thus, their liars and enforcers are their most valued slaves, as they are used to ensure more and more obedient slaves fulfil their masters more-than delusions.

As enforcers are crucial to all social hierarchies in harming those they wish to exploit, they are often subjected to the practice of taking oaths and vows to take advantage of their ignorances to ensure loyalty and obedience. Even if, later down the line, enforcers discover the truth about what they are told to do, this ritual strips them of the very human practice of adapting to new knowledge by reminding them that they took an oath, or vow, to do what they are told to do, even if they no longer wish to do it. Enforcers are encouraged to surrender their free will, compassion, empathy and sense of justice in exchange for their social hierarchy’s ignorances, hate and superficial sense of honour that always reeks of hypocrisy. It is no coincidence that the word soldier is a variant of the term soul dyer.

We all have this thing that defines all that we are, not just parts of us that we can break down into lesser parts, but the totality of what we are. Some call this our soul, but we have other terms like our heart, our spirit, our being and even the god that is in all of us. Not to be confused with out status seekers definitions of a god that is mostly a fictitious dictator, but the god within us that is capable of so much. For the sake of argument and to align with this language, we shall use the term soul to define our totality. We have our complete soul intact when we are very young, but our soul can be broken when we experience trauma or loss. When our soul is intact, we have more empathy for others, but when it is broken, our empathy can be affected, and we can become more capable of inflicting the most heinous of wrongs onto others.

To be a hierarchal enforcer or any other servant of tyranny, it is easier to engage in wrongdoing if our soul is broken. As trauma is a great way to break our souls, our hierarchies use trauma and the traumatised to serve their interests. Many who are placed within our hierarchies have been traumatised in some way, as they are more willing to commit the wrongs that all social hierarchies engage in. There are, of course, many ways to traumatise people, and we could argue that there is nothing more traumatising than the torture, rape and murder of children and babies. Something our hierarchies are very fond of doing.

For those who are encouraged or forced to engage in such things, their soul can be broken forever. We can all mend a broken soul, but some can be more broken than others. By allowing only the most obedient into their secret societies or clubs, where such ritualised acts upon our youngest and most vulnerable are glorified instead of condemned, hierarchies can keep their wrongs a secret and ensure their candidates for elevated worth will interpret any other wrong asked of them in the future to be much easier to commit in comparison.

To form and sustain a social hierarchy, we must share a portion of our ill-gotten gains with a percentage of the group that will support and engage in our wrongs, as, despite what one group of dictators may sell a rival as, no one rules alone. Loyalty for wrongdoers is always important, as they always risk being exposed by their fellow conspirators. Hierarchies, by their very nature, and with their spy networks and basic underhand behaviours, always encourage betrayal. So any complaints of disloyalty are always rather rich, but they do like their pots and kettles.

Only a fool can expect others to be loyal to their greed, although there is no shortage of fools in groups that value differing worth. As social hierarchal civilization is the celebration of differing worth and its malicious intent, with groups, within groups, within groups…etc., constantly jostling for a degree of elevated worth, this makes loyalty to fellow wrongdoers much more of a temporary activity until an advantage emerges. The practice of scratching and stabbing each other’s backs as they slide back and forth along their spectrums of differing worth is an endless cycle that will endure for as long as there are others to disparage. This constant conspiring against one another comes at the cost of any real development within such groups.

Conspire Collude Connive

Social hierarchies constantly conspire to elevate themselves at the cost of the communities they violate and pretend to serve. Yet even this obvious truth is doubted by many who have become so mired in the torrent of lies that flows from their hierarchies’ rivers of deceit, that they actually vilify those who voice the truths of the conspiracies, rather than connect the obvious sequence of events that benefit the hierarchy, as well as ignoring their previous history of such acts. All social hierarchies conspire to harm others, it’s what they must do to gain elevated worth. Every status seeker must do this to some degree, regardless if they are aware of it or not. No social hierarchy can exist without people conspiring with one another, and many within them are encouraged to praise those who inflict the most harm, in order to create a large scale mindset that values the more-than/less-than ignorances.

Social hierarchies are the very definition of conspiracy. Convincing even one individual that they are honest and righteous is in itself a successful conspiracy. The reason all social hierarchies are born from force is because most people have no desire to be controlled or enslaved to serve the interests of a few over their own interests. Thus, in order to force people to do so requires wrongs and conspiracies in order to establish dominance and control of groups over generations.

Try approaching even a small group of free, self-sufficient people, and ask them if they wouldn’t mind redistributing their resources and wealth to the point where they have so much less than they already have that they increase their own struggle to survive. While paying for a few distant glorified people to live in luxury. And try this void of force or the threat of it. Good luck with that. Now, try it with a large army of wrongdoers with the weapons and desire to harm and kill. It tends to make a difference. These wrongdoers don’t just turn up out of the blue, they are all part of the conspiring that must take place to achieve such wrongs and maintain them.

Conspiracies are not a theory under any social hierarchy, they are a necessity. Mass wrongdoing needs its planners. Declaring every truth that is exposed about them as some kind of crazy theory is a desperately pathetic attempt to try and hide their true nature and intent that is plain for all to see (well, for some more than others). It obviously makes sense for those who partake in conspiracies to declare the truth about their actions as a theory, in order to deny their culpability.

The modern practice of hierarchies branding every inconvenient and obvious truth as a conspiracy theory is just our glorified wrongdoers version of “it wasn’t me”, while ridiculing their accusers and pointing fingers at others they wish to harm. Despite the obvious need for conspiracies, it can become common amongst many of our modern contented slaves to dismiss such things as implausible. Ironically, this view in itself is a conspiracy that has been orchestrated by their glorified wrongdoers, but that may be difficult for some to comprehend.

Perhaps considering the truth of such things is just too difficult for some of us, as it would call into question many of the lies we may have come to value, or may even have attached our own personal identity to. So now many hierarchies use the term conspiracy theories for anything and everything that comes close to the truth, or anything that is not attached to the dogma they preach to their populations in an attempt to distort reality.

Many see through these obvious lies, but they are primarily aimed at maintaining the servility of their obedient slaves. With their modern mainstream mass misinformation manipulators, hierarchies can create their own misleading conspiracies in order to misdirect and distract others from what is really going on. Like throwing a haystack of lies onto a needle of truth. This practice of burying inconvenient truths under heaps of lies can be used to create enough doubt in many, even if it’s just until the goals of their real conspiracies are achieved, or generate enough disinterest that few even care about the truth. History shows us that our present has and future will have endless needles that need burying.

There is an abundance of tools in the liebox social hierarchies use to maintain and grow their dominance over others. The need to divide their populations with lies is a true must for any aspiring social hierarchy. As a hierarchy, we must divide our controlled group of people in order to prevent them from uniting under a shared cause, as this would threaten the control and even the existence of our social hierarchy.

Divisions within any group that values the ignorance of differing worth can be achieved with almost anything. Poverty, wealth, religion, sex, ethnicity, politics and endless other things can all be used to encourage kin to hate kin. However, we must manage these divisions without them spiralling out of control, so there is a sweet spot of division. Too little creates the threat of a united slave class, and too much creates the threat to the stability and even existence of the hierarchy.

With the right balance, we can superficially unite and divide our slave classes in order to use them when we feel it is necessary. A well-balanced, divided population can be encouraged to unite in the killing and dying of countless innocent people one day, then manipulated into hating each other the next, in order to serve the interests of a few. Many wars are conspired long before they come about, and false flag events are a well-worn tool for every social hierarchy, especially when the aggressor needs to sell themselves as the defender in their planned wars with their targeted groups, as this gains support for their orchestrated wrongdoing.

This popular tactic of killing those they already dominate under their own fiction and passing the blame onto a targeted group to gain support in stealing the resources of others, is very common. Just don’t expect any hierarchy to report them as such, or put them in their history books. Using false flags to instil a hatred for the targeted group can be used to unite even the most divided population and create a desire to harm a perceived enemy. All while their true enemy (their hierarchy) performs their strong righteous defender act to gain popularity and mask their murderous ways.

Once a social hierarchy has used their populations to achieve their goals of self-enrichment, they must quickly break up any unity that may develop between rival subgroups during the unity of war (as nothing bonds our status seekers more than an orgy of wrongdoing), and encourage divisions before these groups work out that they are just the same. No hierarchy wants their slaves of differing worth to understand they share the same oppressor, and get any ideas of shared goals to alleviate or eradicate their oppression. Thus, post-war manipulations are just as important as pre-war ones.

If a controlled people turn their attention on those who create their hardships and oppressions, instead of on each other, the social hierarchy can be threatened to adapt or even be replaced. To avoid any slave revolt, time-limited social concessions may be made by a hierarchy to appease a united population to some degree, or a more extreme oppressive approach can be required to regain a previous level of control or gain an even more oppressive form.

Different social hierarchies will have differing levels of oppression and injustice, but they walk a tightrope when they become too extreme, as this can force out the human being in even the most brainwashed of enforcers or other obedient slaves. If too lenient, they allow those they oppress to speak freely and risk their populations becoming too aware of the scale of wrongdoing committed with great frequency.

It appears easy enough to convince most that a wrong is right, but when the wrong is so extreme and so obviously wrong to even the belongers/status seekers among us, then the hierarchy can be in trouble of collapse, as they need others to value them in order to exist. Not being oppressive enough can allow people to reconnect with their freedoms and lead to a disobedient population, a combination that can threaten their control. Once they lose the obedience of the oppressed, hierarchies create an opportunity for other factions, hierarchies, sub-hierarchies or those they have oppressed to take their place.

Under a social hierarchy, people are reduced to livestock that are fattened up with lies to make them easier to exploit. The more we gorge ourselves on their lies, the less obvious our oppression can seem, as we can be convinced that our freedom is whatever our enslavers say it is. Tell a sheep in a fenced off field that it is free to roam that field while putting another sheep in a small cage, and that sheep may feel free. However, to a passing sheep that roams free from any master’s cage or fence, they are both at the mercy of their enslaver, and that sheep in the field may no longer feel free once it understands its confinement. Valuing any lie robs us of much, and if we fail to question everything, then we risk valuing anything. When we value the lies we are told or tell ourselves, we can grow overly sensitive to the truth. Hence, why, this is a very common behaviour among those who champion the ignorance of differing worth.

As we step up the severity of wrongdoings our social hierarchies practice to using and abusing, we must bear in mind the sheer scale on which this is done. As social hierarchies are born from violence, it is no surprise that it is so prevalent within them, as in order to exploit most people, we must manipulate and threaten them. The conditional carrot and stick approach is commonplace in these cultures of greed, but they only have so many carrots to go round, and an overabundance of sticks. Social hierarchies use people to do all of the things they really don’t want to do. So by declaring all of the tasks they wish to avoid as low-status tasks or jobs, while bestowing the highest status onto themselves, social status allows them to distance themselves as far from the most unpleasant, dangerous or hardest working tasks as possible.

Let us take the farmer as an example. In many ways, they are the true superstars of every large population and the top requirement for the development and maintenance of any empire of greed. Yet their social status is lower than that of many less-productive fields because of the hard work involved. When governed by those that avoid doing anything physically difficult, physical work is reduced in status to align with the actions of our status seekers.

The forcing of others to do the work we don’t want to do also becomes a sign of status. Social hierarchies fail their populations on a daily basis with their malice and ineptitude as “leaders”. So if they packed up and went on strike for a few months, their contribution to society would go largely unnoticed (well, maybe not to those they terrorise). But if farmers fail to do what they do, then whole empires and civilizations can crumble.

With social status, many of us can become so conditioned to value things of little worth that we devalue the things we require just to survive. We are used and abused by a few in order to feed them, glorify them, enrich them, pleasure them, fight for them, die for them, labour for them, create for them and even validate their malice. We all pay the price for this, even those of us who are part of that few or unaware of the cost. For those of us in any doubt of our subjugation, when told by our social hierarchy to go to war in order to maintain or enhance the wealth of a few, we just have to say no thanks to understand how enslaved we truly are.

If most knew or even cared how people who refuse to kill other human beings are treated by social hierarchies, whether they have no interest in feeding the greed of a few, are peace-loving people or are aware of the true nature and futility of our wars of greed, they would be under none of the illusions of the freedoms that social hierarchies try to sell. The kindest treatment of those who refuse to fight in these well-orchestrated wars organised by our social hierarchies is to be labelled cowards in order to convince others that obeying them is being brave.

Yet what is more cowardly? To obey those who are stronger and more numerous than us, or to defy them. The rewards of many who are too brave to kill for the wealth of a few, was, is and no doubt always will range from belittlement to death. A social hierarchal population can never go beyond mere pawns in the ritualised game of gods, which those deluded enough to believe they are like to play.

This brings us to the cruellest of wrongdoings our social hierarchies practice, which is to imprison, torture, maim and murder purely to serve their own interests. Of course, it is common for them to paint those who endure these treatments as less-than in some way. So they label them villains, criminals, terrorists, evil-doers, bad guys, fraudsters, thieves and murderers to name but a few, yet every social hierarchy is all of these things and worse. Thus, if we are to engage in these activities, then we should always aim to inflict them upon thousands or millions of people, if we wish to be celebrated for them rather than vilified.

The scale of hypocrisy within social hierarchies is enormous and rarely matched, as they present the awful acts they commit as good, glorious, brave, just, necessary and even honourable, while condemning the very same acts committed by those who don’t serve their interests. War and genocide are merely tools to be used by a social hierarchy to achieve their self-serving goals. They will always speak of how ethical they are, but their actions prove their morality is non-existent or very fluid at best. Wars are always about the same thing, control over resources and the wealth they bring. Human beings are nothing more than a resource for social hierarchies, and always one of the top resources, as slaves build all empires, leaving our glorified wrongdoers free to indulge in their own base desires to be special.

Telling most of our modern slaves that they are slaves will often be met with denial, despite all social hierarchies levels of inequality and injustice. But even with the many contented slaves our social hierarchies produce, we as human beings are not so lacking in intellect that we are always going to tolerate such mistreatment. The level of wrongdoing that is required to maintain differing worth can’t go ignored by so many for so long (with perhaps the exception of our modern-day contented slaves who are conditioned almost from birth to accept or ignore such wrongs).

The obvious (to some more than others) gross injustice and inequality, always has and always will lead to periodic cycles of rebellion against the mass wrongdoing required to maintain it. In today’s world, many social hierarchies no longer find the word slave palatable, so they use different words like servant, employee or a legal fiction, but whatever words they prefer to use in order to reduce a human being to a thing deserving of exploitation, they always try to justify their malice in some way.

The Chains of Compliance

Now, of course, many modern hierarchies have their codes or laws that say slavery is bad, but this is little more than a rebranding of the definition of slavery, rather than the removal of the master/slave social structure that all social hierarchies are built and maintained on.

Social hierarchies break their own laws on a daily basis, so they are rarely worth the paper they are written on. So let’s take a look at a relatively more honest time when a slave was called a slave. Before the rebranding of slavery, social hierarchies would steal (or tax, as they prefer to call it) a portion of wealth from the population of those they deem as somewhat worthy humans. So those with property, land and businesses. Using our limited historical records, we could argue that this tax was usually on average, around 10%, and obviously, many slaves paid no tax as they were deemed unworthy of being compensated for their efforts and had no property, as they themselves were viewed as property.

Even their own children were not regarded as their own and often became the property of their masters. A practice that still remains to this day, as parents reduce their children to a legal fiction when trading them for a birth certificate. Anyone who has had their children stolen from them by their social hierarchy users and abusers can testify to this enslavement. But more about that later.

The rebranding of traditional slavery to debt slavery was made to benefit those that wished to monopolise debt slavery. By encouraging and forcing other social hierarchies to make the transition to exploiting debt slaves instead of their traditional counterparts, our medium of exchange monopolists took control of the whole slave industry.

The “abolition of slavery” may have been sold as some great advancement in social equality, but it is just yet another lie used to mask a takeover bid to monopolise the industry of human exploitation. Slave markets were largely replaced with employment markets that are in effect the same thing, somewhere more-thans go to acquire less-thans who will do what they are told to do. The abolition of differing worth would do much more for social harmony and equality than any slave industry’s marketing team could ever achieve. But no self-respecting status seeker would want to give up their ego-feeding levers.

As hierarchies generate much of their wealth by stealing from (or taxing) their populations, it is vastly more profitable for them to “free” their slave populations and promote them to legal fiction slaves that can earn wealth and own property. That way, there is more for the hierarchy to steal. As slaves normally outnumber the non-slave population, this pseudo-abolition of slavery on paper can greatly multiply the number of people a hierarchy can steal (or tax) from, without losing the ability to exploit people for labour, war, sex or anything else they wish. So now, instead of slaves just serving the interests of their immediate masters, they are made to serve their immediate masters or employer, their hierarchy or government, as well as the money monopolists who enslave them all.

To go from a hierarchy that once took only around 10% from a small perceived worthy portion of their population, to taking over 30-50%+ from all their populations wealth (except the wealth of the glorified few of course, who are exempt from theft/tax), means it has never been a better time to be a social hierarchy, and we will delve more into the abolition of slavery nonsense later.

This mass thievery and enslavement, using debt that is controlled by what we now call our banking or financial systems, helped to orchestrate this more profitable debt slave culture to create the slavemaster’s utopia in which we live today. The great wealth produced by the rebranding of slavery has made our social hierarchies very wealthy, and with the level of propaganda that is constantly aimed at their slaves, it is understandable that many become content with the idea of feeding the greed of a few, over serving their own interests or even the interests of their communities.

With at least one out of every 200 of us being subjected to the more traditional form of slavery, some argue that we have more traditional slaves today than we have ever had. And when we add the remaining 198.9 out of every 200 being reduced to a debt slave to some degree, it is not difficult to recognise that we are a slave species. Generally, the more territory and therefore slaves a hierarchy has, the more power and wealth they acquire.

Many of us may scoff at the idea of our “advanced civilization” using their populations as slaves, especially if we have always been obedient to our hierarchy’s demands, but not all slaves are shackled with iron or beaten with whips and sticks. Within the modern rebranded slave trade, human beings are shackled with debt and flogged with lies. Freedom is restricted and then sold as an attainable goal to those who obey, as a way of encouraging compliance, just as it was when slaves were called slaves. Obedient slaves usually just get bigger and more adorned cages than disobedient ones.

Modern slaves no longer belong to individuals, as that would be immoral, so instead they belong to corporations and the group of individuals who hide behind them, because, as we all know, corporations are much more moral than individuals. As this more covert way of enslaving people is declared as a much more ethical way of enslaving people than the more traditional iron and chain method, we get many who overestimate the freedoms of debt slaves by using terms such as employee or civilian, rather than contented slave.

When it comes to our status seekers, the greater the layer of lies we value, the more “sophisticated” we tend to see ourselves as. So interestingly enough, it is no coincidence that the very definition of the word meant deceptive, misleading, unnatural, impure, spurious and disingenuous, while being unsophisticated meant being ingenuous and natural. As status seekers often like to see themselves as more sophisticated than others, and when understanding the historical definitions of the word, it is hard to argue with that assessment.

Some may struggle in defining a modern-day slave as a slave, but if we look at what we have always done in serving our most basic needs of water, food and shelter, how many of us are free to attain these things by ourselves before we are attacked by those who call themselves civilized. Many who go to catch a fish or a bird to feed their family, are harassed by thieves insisting they need a licence to feed themselves. The same goes for building a shelter, and even the basic act of going from point A to point B is always an opportunity for status seekers to exploit others.

Criminalising basic human behaviours and needs by limiting the options of their populations means they are easier to control and exploit. When almost all control is taken from them, there is little people can do without feeding the greed of a few. By removing the ability of their populations to be self-sufficient, hierarchies make their populations reliant on them and therefore much easier to exploit. The reliance on an exclusively controlled medium of exchange just to survive greatly reduces a population’s ability to form any real resistance against their oppressors, never mind advance to any great degree.

Obedience Masked as Respect

As we are not born with a desire to be enslaved, let’s have a look at those of us who, more often than not, blindly help our masters to create our empires of slaves. No respectable social hierarchy in the modern era is going to lower themselves to be the enforcers of their own nonsense, so they buy enforcers from their slave populations to do the dirty work of harming others for them. A hierarchy of slaves has always existed, and no doubt always will, as promoting obedient slaves above disobedient slaves is a very simple way of controlling, encouraging and rewarding subservient behaviour, as well as keeping the slave population divided.

Within the slave hierarchy, ambition is sold by their masters as going from being ordered to obey every command and being harmed if the effort is deemed unworthy, to barking out orders and harming those our masters or we have decreed to have underperformed in some way. So there is always going to be some sort of status bestowed upon slaves who become enforcers for their hierarchy. With a degree of elevated status and wealth available for slaves who aid in the enslavement of their own kin, hierarchies encourage their slaves to slither along their spectrums of differing worth. Most of us, given the choice, would probably prefer to be the ones doing the harming rather than be the ones being harmed, and such abusive practices work great at instilling hate among slaves. Our history shows us what happens when slave populations unite, so all social hierarchies use enforcer slaves to discourage this.

Social hierarchies always discourage their populations from asking too many questions, but this is taken to an extreme level when it comes to their enforcers. Their modern armed or police forces always deploy this kind of oppression against the individuals who find themselves serving these hierarchies. Blind obedience is always encouraged and even demanded from their enforcers, as allowing their servants to drift from the narratives their hierarchies use to cover their wrongdoing could result in a lack of enforcement, and, therefore, less profitable endeavours.

Now it is easy to criticize those of us who suffer from blind obedience, but we must remember that for most, this conditioning can start from a very early age. When we grow up in a culture where most people who have any kind of wealth and status are the ones who champion the ignorances their hierarchy forces them to value, we can at least understand why many use those ignorances to obey their glorious wrongdoers.

So we get generation after generation of slave wrongdoers that believe they are the good guys, simply because their hierarchy told them so, and void of any real analysis, many can justify (at least to themselves) the wrongs they commit, and even morph them into rights. But of course, we are all human, and even the most brainwashed of us in favour of differing worth can come to the realization that the acts we committed were merely to feed the greed of a few, and that they were wrong.

Such a realization may come too late for our victims, but we must bear in mind that most people who execute the wrongs our hierarchies inflict upon others are predominantly young males from what we now call disadvantaged backgrounds, coupled with the heavily distorted propagandised view of the world their hierarchies subject them to. So any such realization can take time to gradually creep up on us, as we gain more understanding of the world we find ourselves in.

We must also bear in mind that many young males are arguably among the most unlikely of adult groups to see those they are harming as someone’s child, especially if their victims are of similar sex and age, or older. A lack of life experience and empathy plays its part in our eagerness to harm each other, and this is not to excuse our wrongdoing, it is just to understand some of the many reasons for it. Blind obedience may be interpreted differently in the minds of some, but it is nothing more than a slavemaster’s dream to have slaves who will do anything they are told to do without question.

Once a hierarchy has created its obedient slave army, the preferred term to use when exploiting these slaves is through orders. Blind obedience to orders from those with more wealth, status or titles can become totally normal for many. We will never be free from the excuse of “just following orders” to justify the many wrongs we inflict upon one another, as long as we have social hierarchies. Again, in understanding this behaviour of blind obedience, we must understand the very abusive environments that enforcement groups create for our overly obedient slaves, as anyone within these forces who has refused to obey the magical orders of these groups will know too well.

So it can be much easier and safer to do what we are told, regardless of right and wrong, than it is to question or refuse to engage in any wrongdoing. However, we must all take responsibility for our actions at some point. Many are attracted to becoming enforcers for many reasons, from good and honourable intentions to exercising our desire to harm others. Our social hierarchies take advantage of those from all ends of this spectrum.

However, if we are too extreme in our desire to harm others, then we can become a liability to our hierarchy if our actions become widely known and damage the lies of respectability that all social hierarchies hide behind. Similarly, if we are too honourable and have a desire to do what is right, then we threaten our hierarchies same lies of respectability if we refuse to engage in actions we know to be wrong. If we voice those concerns within the force, we are disruptive, and if we publicly voice any concerns, we are traitors.

Every force under every social hierarchy have treated enforcers who refuse to engage in extreme wrongdoing very badly. This can range from the mildest repercussions of demotion or expulsion, to imprisonment, torture and even death. Many enforcers have lost their lives in standing against the wrongdoing of their own colleagues and hierarchy, and there are few medals, monuments or awards for those who do so. If we seek value within any social hierarchal force, we could argue it is wise to go along with any glorified wrong to gain status, if that status means more to us than any desire to be honourable or righteous.

Those of us who obey our glorified wrongdoers can attain all the accolades our hierarchies throw out, and one of the most common is how brave those who obey are, but the bravery of those within these forces to make any stand against their master’s wrongs will never be called bravery by their hierarchy. So there is a goldilocks area on the spectrum of rightfulness and wrongfulness that makes a “good” slave enforcer that all social hierarchies prefer, but all can be exploited.

In times of peace and especially in times of war, our social hierarchies are often hostile to any kind of reasonable debate or criticism to their methods of control. So all within their control are often deemed either patriots or traitors, depending on the level of obedience they demonstrate. The mere idea that there could be individuals within a hierarchal population that have no interest in participating in serving the interests of a handful of people is almost inconceivable to those our social hierarchies have convinced to self-identify as a patriot to their greed. So if anyone is not for feeding the greed of a few, then they must be against it, even when they play no role either way, and leads them to be branded as the enemy in the paranoid minds of our status seekers. By using such manipulative tactics, hierarchies encourage others to participate in order to avoid being harmed by them.

Warmongering is always at the fore of a large, dominant military hierarchy, as the odds of coming out on top of any conflict are always in their favour. With the huge profit margins of an unlosable war almost certain to expand their level of wealth and control, it takes little to convince such a culture of greed to gain great investment in the industry of war. It is not just social hierarchies and the industries that support war that are keen to engage in their orgies of wrongdoing, but many who join armed forces are often conditioned to glorify the acts of war, and are therefore keen to test themselves to emulate or surpass those who have been glorified before them. For many generals, war is their opportunity for glory, fame and status, and even fulfils the status seekers idea of becoming part of their hierarchy’s history. For these reasons alone, many will be eager to engage in the mass wrongdoings of war, just to stroke their own egos.

According to the histories of social hierarchies, the greatest generals are often the ones who murdered the most people and stole the most wealth, territories and property. However, we could argue that the greatest generals in history never went to war, as they helped to maintained peace and a stable society. By reserving their glory for generals who stole great wealth for their hierarchies, rather than bestowing it upon those who defended or maintained it, hierarchies show their nature of valuing excess greed. Prolific invaders who engage in mass murder and genocide with regularity are highly valued by many social hierarchal histories, and even used as a source of inspiration in generating great wealth.

This helps many in aspiring to conquer as much as they can get away with, just as their predecessors did. Social hierarchies tend to kill more of their own population than that of a competing social hierarchy, unless of course, they are particularly prolific invaders. This alone should be enough reason for any population to construct their own social systems free from social status, but let’s not let reason get in the way of mass murder or the glorification of genocide. We could compare social hierarchies to the making of stocks and soups, in that the scum always rises to the top.

If any group of people were going to set up a new social structure, it would be reasonable to imagine that in order for the group to thrive and advance at a decent pace, among the most important things to establish after the basics of water, food and shelter would be a system of education, health and law, as well as a fair and efficient distribution of resources and labour. Now, of course, some may believe we already have all of this, but the reality is that all social hierarchies use these things not for the good of the group, but in order to serve the interests of a few. Void of a political system that values social equality, everything becomes a tool to develop differing worth. Systems of education, health and law, as well as a medium of exchange, are just some of the tools used to manipulate all those under the control of the social hierarchy, but more on these later. For now, let us examine the idea of at least establishing the basics of water, food and shelter.

There should be few of us that are unaware of how extreme the levels of inefficiency and unfairness are within our cults of differing worth. As millions die of hunger, while obesity kills millions more every year, the absurdity of valuing our desire to hoard and our unwillingness to share is exposed. Millions go hungry due to our glorified wrongdoers orchestrated inequality and famines, while we have billions of tons of food lost and wasted, not to mention that we deliberately destroy tons of food just to keep market prices at levels deemed acceptable by the few who monopolise our resources and industries.

On top of that, there is the fresh water we waste on growing this wasted food, combined with inefficient irrigation, poor crop choice and our inability to reuse our own wastewater for crops, which contributes to the inefficient way we use our fresh water. While millions die from dirty drinking water and related diseases every year, most of whom are children, much of the world’s fresh water supply is monopolised by a few, who gain great wealth by selling it to those who can afford it.

To add insult to injury, while we have millions dying of dehydration due to the lack of wealth and access to clean drinking water, our glorified wrongdoers even enrich themselves with their charities that pretend to resolve the problems they create, just to further feed their greed. As for the basic of shelter, with estimates of more than 150 million people that have no shelter and 1.6 billion that have inadequate shelter, just having a safe space to call home is out of reach for many. While saying nothing of the endless land grabs and forced migrations of our endless bankers wars, or the billions of people who are subjected to the bankers mortgage frauds and greedy landlords that leave many teetering on the edge of homelessness.

This is just the basics of water, food and shelter, never mind anything else. As long as we are chained to the wasteful competing mentalities our social hierarchies encourage, over a cooperative mentality, this wastefulness of human life and our resources will no doubt continue, and most likely become even more unbalanced and inefficient as the most glorified few become even fewer. As competing social hierarchies squabble for power and control amongst themselves, they can always fall back on their more-than/less-than ignorances to justify all those who needlessly die every day.

As those who are doing most of the dying have little to no social status, it is of no great loss as far as any hierarchy is concerned. For those who suffer from the ignorance of differing worth, it can be perfectly reasonable when whole nations are asked to mourn the death of one glorified wrongdoer, even if they died an aged-related death at the age of 100. Yet the death of millions of less-thans is barely noteworthy. This sad and consistently repeated practice sums up how pathetic these cultures truly are, in terms of any kind of moral sense. But within any culture that perceives a wrong as right, what use is any kind of morality?

As cultures mired in social status all suffer from the more-than/less-than ignorances on a large scale, this makes them more unstable than a more equal or egalitarian group of people. To raise the status of one individual, we must lower the status of everyone else. Thus, we lower the worth of all. To achieve this to the same extreme in a more egalitarian group would be more difficult, as the acts of status seekers in such an environment would be seen for what they are, when void of the glorification of any individual. As status seekers must perform some very nasty acts of violence and be very selective about morality in order to wallow in their delusion to be special, pseudo-morality backed by force becomes the norm and is a practice that we can observe within all cultures mired in social status. No matter the time or place, they exist.

Just as many growing up in an egalitarian group would come to value equality, many growing up in a culture of differing worth come to value inequality. Once differing social status is established, getting others to value it is more easily achieved, and equality is reduced to a nice but impractical (less profitable for a few) idea in the minds of status seekers within such cultures. For those who understand that we are all worthy of our lives, free from the wrongs of others, ridicule awaits, as this mere concept is reduced to an absurd fantasy to those of us mired in the delusions of differing worth.

The instability of social hierarchies is something that even these compulsive liars acknowledge, but this recognition is more to do with their attempt to glorify and justify their own hierarchy as the victors in the volatile process of organising groups with a human grading system, rather than any real understanding of the inevitability of such groups’ failures or the level of resistance people have against being enslaved to serve others. Many social hierarchies have the same old story of being enslaved by another evil hierarchy, only to bravely and gloriously defeat or escape their enslavers to free themselves and start their own glorious hierarchy.

The endless cycle of groups going from the enslaved to the enslavers and vice versa, will no doubt play out as long as we have our social hierarchies. Now we could argue there is nothing unjust about the enslaved going on to enslave or kill their enslavers, but once the enslaved gain their freedom, there will always be a few who will succumb to their own greed and desire to be special, when given the opportunity. So the cycle of the oppressed becoming the oppressors and vice versa rolls on. That and the master’s habit of evading the wrath of their slaves, only to return at a later date with an army to restore their “social order”, is part of our behaviour.

Even with all the good intentions in the world, human beings are human beings, and the idea that we are more than others lies within our egos. Therefore, given the opportunity, many of us would succumb to such delusions, hence why we end up back to the ways of masters and slaves. So no matter how many times we overthrow a social hierarchy, we usually just replace them with another. We could argue that even if a group of people are intimately aware of the destructiveness of social hierarchies, then escape their enforced servitude to set up their own social structure, if they don’t create laws to protect their population from status-seeking wrongdoing or any social practices in curtailing elevated worth, within a few generations (if not sooner,) those who never knew or cared for the inefficiencies and injustices of social hierarchies, would soon be vying to feed their more-than delusions by acquiring as much wealth and power as they can.

So what is power within our groups? Well, at its core, it is just the ability to get others to do what we want them to do. We can achieve this with force, wealth, status or the rarer method of genuine respect. As hierarchal power creates wealth and hierarchal wealth creates power, those who have wealth can use it to gain power, and those who have power can use it to create wealth. For those of us who value having control over other people, we can use this power to delude ourselves into believing we are superior or more special than those we inflict our whims upon.

When we are given too much power over others, it is inevitable that many of us will use this to toy with the lives of those we see as less-than, as a way of consolidating the value of the ignorances we have developed to reach this level of delusion. Within our superficial status cultures, most are encouraged to hand over their power to almost anyone that wants it, especially if they claim to have some kind of authority over them. So most are encouraged to give it away as if it is nothing to them. This may appear ridiculous to the free, but good luck finding such folk in today’s world.

As social hierarchies have to buy others and give them relative status in order to create a tier system of social worth to prop up their own elevated worth, once this has been established, hierarchies can rely heavily on status to strip others of their power in order to enrich themselves, as status is the easiest and cheapest way to take other people’s power from them. This brings us to respect. Now, of course, there will always be those who confuse respect with obedience. Fear, wealth and status are all superficial forms of respect, but for a status seeker, obedience is an adequate form of respect. As all status seekers are themselves superficial, and as their actions and words never match, superficial respect is about as good as it gets for status seekers.

Genuine respect for an individual or group can only be achieved through their actions. Unlike the superficial form, we can’t buy it, intimidate it, threaten it or force it, unless we surround ourselves with liars and fools. It is often only when we give that we are worthy of genuine respect. Making this the rarest and most difficult way to acquire power within cultures that champion wrongdoing. Genuine respect is the most enduring form of power, as people who give their power to those they respect often do so because there is more meaning in what they do and a trust in their intent, and gaining power is rarely a goal of those most worthy of it.

Now, of course, the more we are susceptible to lies, the more difficult it can be to differentiate between the genuine and the superficial, and as meaning is subjective, we can attach it to almost anything. We see this within every hierarchal group. Respect is ours to give or deny, but too many of us give it to those who are undeserving of it. It goes without saying (yet saying it anyway) that we should all have a base respect for everyone, and most of us know from an early age how to respect others by simply treating each other how we want to be treated. Yet this basic instinct often gets lost and distorted the more we are exposed to the ignorances of a social hierarchy.

Having power over others is something our status seekers desire, as in their minds, it confirms their superiority. As those who seek power are usually driven by the ugly side of our nature, the powerful will always exploit the powerless. Our compassion, love and understanding has little use to us if we desire power just to serve our own base desires. When we use our ability to understand what we are instead of allowing our ignorance to guide us, it is difficult not to have a degree of compassion and love for our fellow cousins. By using the beautiful side of our nature, we are vastly more capable of aiding others to empower themselves, in order to help them flourish, and much less likely to see others as something to dominate and control. Thus, in essence, our malice conditions us to fawn over some and disrespect others, while our benevolence conditions us to respect all.

We can be either encouraged or discouraged to respect others by our parents or carers, but every social hierarchy encourages all to respect those whom they have bestowed status upon, while encouraging disrespect on whole groups that they deem unworthy of even basic respect. Many will adopt these ignorances, but many will ignore them despite the social pressures and maintain their basic respect for humans and all life. Power gained by genuine respect is a more advanced form of respect (even a lesser form of love if you like) that we can all succumb to when we see something we value in others. It is not as fragile as our status seekers diluted versions of respect that are always built on lies.

With our glorified wrongdoers’ forms of respect being based on fear, greed and ignorance, it is only useful on those who indulge in such things, but can vanish in the greedy, the fearful and the ignorant to defy those that demand any superficial respect, as soon as their greed, fear or ignorance goes unfed. For the most part, we all value the same things, but if our values become only about ourselves, or we adopt them from any hierarchy, then we can become as hypocritical as any social hierarchy.

Fictions Do No Wrong

The people who make up our social hierarchies like to hide behind a myriad of fictitious entities, such as corporations, states, countries and gods, to name but a few. By declaring any of these entities as a driving force behind the mass wrongdoings inflicted on their own slave population (or a foreign population any hierarchy wishes to invade and bring under their control), a hierarchy can use these fictions to attempt to mask or mitigate their accountability for the wrongs they commit. The handful of people who are responsible for orchestrating our mass wrongdoings, benefit hugely form such fictions, as they can use them to conceal their identity, true intent and the level of prosperity they gain from the harm they inflict.

Telling people to kill and die in their thousands or millions, just so a handful of people can increase their wealth and status, may be an honest approach to warmongering, but maybe not the most effective in encouraging others to join such a cause. Killing and dying for a fiction, on the other hand, like a corporation, state, country or god, is more acceptable to those of us who have been conditioned to attach part of our own identity to such fictions. Thus, forcing fictitious identities onto slaves is always crucial.

The birth of corporations allowed social hierarchies to encourage their populations to risk their own wealth and time in acquiring their money monopolists’ tokens of worth, as long as they hand over a sizeable percentage of their earnings to their hierarchy, of course. It is not difficult to understand why this no-risk and reward-only system holds great popularity for our hierarchies, though it does tend to create mini empires within empires. By encouraging others to create their own businesses or corporations with their own wealth and time, social hierarchies gain greatly by stealing (or taxing) a large percentage of any wealth others acquire, and lose nothing when others fail in their ventures.

In fact, our hierarchies can gain when others fail, and their practice of taking from others is often the leading cause of their failure. These controlled mini empires within their own empire can generate huge wealth with little to no investment, outside the necessary glorified wrongdoers who engage in forcing others to bow to the will of the few. However, should a corporation become too large and powerful to be able to afford their own army of wrongdoers, then they could become a rival, rather than a vassal, so they always need to be controlled. This is why most “leaders” of industries are puppets of our hierarchies, and why every industry is heavily monopolised.

Today, our social hierarchies are fictitious corporations that mimic the identity of the fiction given to the land mass they rule over, so they hide behind corporations that hide behind countries. This helps in convincing many into believing they are serving the population of a land mass or country, rather than the profit margins of a few who own a corporation with the same name. There are no countries, just corporations that pretend that their interests and the interests of the populations and land within their control, are the same. So flags and borders become reason enough for many to engage in wrongdoing, while feeding the greed of their corporation’s shareholders is glorified as some kind of honourable act, and even translated into serving THEIR country. This ignorance goes even further when the populations these corporations rule over are expected to glorify all involved in achieving the loot of wealth and slaves, the few get to monopolise. Whether we are forced to or want to serve the interests of a few (or “our country”, as it is sold), there will always be a market for such work within any social hierarchy.

With most of us all too willing to attach our identity to our glorified wrongdoer’s imaginations, the majority can be easily manipulated into defending or being offended by something that is not real. No country, god, state or corporation needs to be defended from anything, as none of them exist outside of our minds. They are all just concepts of our imaginations or, at best, concepts we use to define something. We may as well defend time, but as time does not require regular genocides in order to exist, it may be difficult for our glorified wrongdoers to drape the veil of time over their murderous intent.

Although, in saying that, we should not rule out a “your time needs you” as a rallying call for our future genocides. By using conceptualization to encouraging their slaves to value any glorified concept, our hierarchies have an easier time in manipulating all who come to value such concepts. Whether it’s a fiction attached to a land mass or an imaginary arbitrator of human authority, it matters little to any hierarchy, as long as their slaves do what they want them to do, any fiction will do.

We have created so many gods that the mass popularity of just a few is only due to the level of wrongdoing and regular genocides committed by those who forced their victims to value these fictions. Depending on our definition of a god (and leaving any of us mere mortals who have totally surrendered our minds to the ego, out of the equation for a moment), we have created thousands to hundreds of millions within the short period of time we call our known history. If we add the millions of years of human history to this, then we can only imagine how many gods or other fictions many of our ancestors have valued at some point in time, and no doubt we will go on to create millions more, especially if we never evolve past our social structures of differing worth.

Many modern social hierarchies confine themselves to the imaginary lines on a map that they use to carve out the territory they control, and they can often only widen these lines with bribes, threats or force. Whereas a hierarchy that creates its own gods and religion can use its lies and threats to control others outside their borders, without the need to buy an army to take any territory. A method of conquest that is a lot easier and less expensive than a solely territorial hierarchy. With the vastly cheaper costs of a few liars, propagandist, or preachers, to that of huge armies, using gods and religion to monopolise a population, is kind of a no-brainer for our glorified wrongdoers.

Solely territorial hierarchies that do not use these glorified lies are confined to owning the resources and people that live within their borders. Whereas religious hierarchies can manipulate a much larger amount of people all around the world, as their control is over all immortal minds that glorify those very human beings that claim to offer everlasting life, and not limited to the glorification of a particular territory in the same way our solely territorial-based hierarchies are.

Although as both types of hierarchy see people as a resource to be exploited, we will always be little more than a source of income to those who hide behind status-based fictions, not human beings worthy of respect. As our religious hierarchies begin by the usual way of violent conquest, or by being created by an already established social hierarchy that has already engaged in violent conquest, the common hypocrisy of their laws/rules, peace and love is conveniently ignored by many who come to value them.

Once a religious hierarchy has established their military dominance, and by not limiting their greed and wrongdoing to those within one specific imaginary line on a map in the same way a solely territorial social hierarchies does, they can conspire within and even alongside many territorial social hierarchies in order to gain a lot more influence and control over vastly more people. This can often result in tensions between a religious and a territorial hierarchy, as they compete for the wealth of their victims by jostling for influence and control. By sending out their missionaries to produce more slaves and income, these salesmen of immortality can infect cultures far from their own borders, to greatly increase their master’s wealth. Many of their victims are prepared to pay handsomely for their immortality, while those who offer little wealth in return for any immortality can always be used for labour and sex as payment.

As gods are so profitable, why would any competing hierarchy adopt the gods of another? Well, many reasons. Being forced to is always a popular method of convincing any competing social hierarchy to adopt any nonsense, but when any religion or god becomes a widespread ignorance within their own or a neighbouring hierarchies’ population, they can take advantage of those who are already obedient to these ignorances. Thus, by influencing or controlling the narratives of immortality, any hierarchy can benefit hugely from this source of manipulation. This adoption of a collective use of a widely accepted social exploit has the added benefit of discouraging any invasion from a rival hierarchy, as it can create many allies instead of enemies from competing hierarchies who have adopted the same exploit surrounding their slaves’ immortality.

Any growing alliance under a religion or god will also encourage neighbouring hierarchies to follow suit, or risk being isolated or a target of any alliance that is united by the same ignorance. It is no coincidence that the widespread religions of today’s world are largely social hierarchies that are neighbours, vassal states, colonies or ex colonies. It appears their gods do love their proximity. Despite what some may have been led to believe, no god has created any human, but humans do create gods. Now we could argue the number of gods we have created are at least in the millions or even billions, but we won’t waste time on debating something that only exists within the minds of the ignorant.

Regardless of the number of gods we create, modern religious hierarchies tend to reduce them down to one, and of course, they put their one god on a pedestal above all others, in an attempt to sway people from the control of a competing god or religious hierarchy. These hierarchies encourage those they control to belittle other religions and gods, as well as deny their existence, so we end up with the lunacy of millions of people who see the nonsense of religions and gods within others, but not within themselves.

The more people a religious hierarchy can indoctrinate into their group, whether by force, coercion or persuasion, the more wealth they can amass. So it is no coincidence that the top two wealthiest religious hierarchies of our time have larger populations under their control than competing religious hierarchies. Many may have been led to believe that their gods (or their administrators) love their followers, but they obviously love their wealth more.

Our gods are predominantly a creation of men, as they are vastly more concerned with status than women are. As many of us tend to be more easily influenced by rich men, rather than poor men, we can understand why many follow rich men’s gods over poor men’s gods. When understanding the uses of gods, we can’t discount the fact that many male extreme status seekers see themselves as gods, or at least wish to be seen as one, as this is a very common human desire that lurks within the recesses of the male ego.

For many of us, gods serve two purposes. The first purpose gives us an excuse to maintain and excuse our ignorances, and the second purpose allows manipulators to use and abuse those of us that use gods for the first purpose. No prizes for guessing which purpose social hierarchies are most fond of. Now, for those that use gods for the second purpose, the gains are obvious, but what’s in it for those of us who suffer from the first purpose? Well, let’s face it, no human can know everything, even if we live a thousand lifetimes, although we could argue some could get pretty close. It can be difficult for many of us to accept our ignorances, and even more so for a status seeker, but when it comes to gods and religions, for many, it is largely about social acceptance and belonging, but there is also the inability to accept our mortality. So when someone comes along and tells us that there is no need to accept our mortality, then those of us that struggle to do so can be swayed into denying it.

By deluding ourselves into being immortals, it not only costs us our profound knowledge and appreciation of life, but we also surrender our power and wealth to the terms and conditions placed on the immortality that is being sold to us by those who control religious hierarchies. It is within these immortal contracts where these manipulators generate much of their wealth and power. Which, like many frauds, are used over and over again to create great wealth and power that allows a few to dominant the immortal industry. The industry of immortality has few overheads, as lies cost little to produce, so perhaps it is no wonder that many have turned to this industry to enrich themselves or even just to make a living, as even the most unknowledgeable, incompetent and unproductive of us can often lie with ease.

All social hierarchies wear masks of virtue and morality to hide their wrongs behind, but religious groups take this type of manipulation to a whole different level of nonsense. Religions are so ludicrously contradicting, hypocritical and fanciful that even the most suggestible minds can struggle to take them seriously when void of violence and oppression. However, for masters trying to get their slaves to value their will, when masked as the will of the particular god they have convinced their slaves to believe in, lies are obviously an easier way to control slaves than fighting them all the time. As lies are much cheaper than enforcers, our time of a golden age of glorified wrongdoing is saturated with them. However greedy the immortal industry is, our gods can’t compete in wealth when it comes to the frauds of our monopolists of human worth. Never have so few taken so much from so many, using the combination of lies and violence, than our medium of exchange monopolists, but more about them in the next chapter.

Religious groups do love their prophecies and tend to dramatise them as some kind of divine evidence to validate the lies they sell, even though anyone with a basic understanding of human nature, as well as nature and its cycles, could easily predict future scenarios without the need to attach such events to a lie. As religions are used by social hierarchies as another lie to aid and justify their human exploitation industries, it is perhaps no wonder that many oppressed hierarchal groups form their own religions in order to defy or distance themselves from their oppressors. It is more common for such groups to create a variant on an already established religion, as it is much easier to convince disgruntled followers of one religion to value something they are familiar with, rather than something completely different. Gods and religions are used as weapons, just like every other tool, and are mere extensions of our hierarchies’ desires in demanding obedience to the greed of a few.

Our territorial social hierarchies demand obedience in exchange for inferior belonging, or face more extreme oppression and violence. Our religious social hierarchies sell obedience in exchange for the comforting lie of an eternal life of joy, whereas disobedience is sold as an uncomfortable lie of eternal pain, coupled with more extreme oppression and violence, while on Earth, of course. All social hierarchies sell the lie that a fiction is more than any individual, and when it comes to generating great wealth for a few, we could argue that they are right.

Those that do not suffer from the delusions of rich men’s fictions, and are kind, compassionate and actively righteous, present a real problem for hierarchies that use moral righteousness for exploitation. The mere idea that some people do the right thing without the need of rewards (real or imaginary) from our hierarchies fictions, exposes their law-abiding and religious people’s behaviours as reward-based acts that most animals respond to. Making it obvious that they are not quite as righteous or as moral as many of them are encouraged to tell themselves.

This makes more actively righteous people a target for hierarchies and their followers, as they must attempt to maintain any validity to the lies they sell, and there are no wrongs that have been spared on those who are actively righteous, by those that claim to monopolise righteousness and morality. These self-glorifying wrongdoers even credit their deeds as their duty or gods work, to selflessly discredit their own malice, ignorance and greed. However, not all respect their false modesty. It takes an advanced form of selfishness to indulge in any god, whether it be a rich man’s one or our own. By using the lie of a god, we allow our ego to betray our intellect, meaning we can ignore every truth that can bust our bubble of self-importance.

All social hierarchies love their secrecy, and who can blame them, as any wrongdoer who is trying to sell themself as righteous must keep their actions secret. Many belongers and status seekers can gain elevated worth from secrets, as knowing something others don’t know is a very basic activity in convincing ourselves of our specialness. Hierarchies can exploit this to take advantage of their more obedient and mentally weaker slaves. Secrecy can maintain their silence about any wrongdoing or anything else that counters their hierarchy’s narratives. Enforcers are especially encouraged to be secretive about the wrongs they are told to commit, for obvious reasons, as are all who involve themselves within their wrongdoing industries of hate, in exchange for a degree of elevated worth.

The Puppet Show

The words that flow from hierarchies may be steeped in lies, but their action tell the truth, hence why they constantly construct barely plausible reasons for what they do, in an attempt to mask the truths of their actions. So if we ignore their words and observe their actions, then we step closer to the truth. As the truth is a great threat to social hierarchies, it is common for them to attack those who voice a truth, rather than debate the subject in any genuine manner, as that could go down the path of exposing inconvenient truths. As a result, many within these cultures (especially those of high-status) adopt the competitive method of conversation, which reduces the activity to a shallow point scoring contest that renders most conversations or debates to be totally pointless. However, from our liar’s point of view, rendering a conversation or debate to a pointless exercise is a win, as it aids in avoiding the truth. Hence why this method is so widely used and taught to those earmarked to become part of the hierarchy and their cheerleaders.

As almost all those involved with representing their social hierarchy engage at some level in the mass wrongdoings they inflict upon others, it makes all involved a target of those who have been wronged. Hence why the most enduring social hierarchies are the ones that hide behind their stooges, far from public view. This way, those who hide behind a hierarchy can avoid any kind of personal consequence for their wrongdoings and offer up their sacrificial lambs, who obey their will, as an offering to any disgruntled population, group or individual that decides not to endure their wrongs any longer. By using puppet hierarchies as a shield against accountability, appeasing the wronged in our modern cultures can be as easy as a resignation, or as extreme as abandoning their servants to the justice of the wronged.

Either way, the real hierarchy can avoid any harm and can buy another set of puppets, or even set up their systems of wrongdoing among another population if they lose control of theirs. Our medium of exchange monopolists are the most successful at this, as their hierarchies can endure for a very long time when they have the ability to buy anything and anyone.

As effective as this system is, it presents the problem of a stooge using their position of power against the hierarchy that put them there to do their bidding, so they need to be somewhat selective. This involves indoctrinating their candidates into a small special group, as well as compromising any candidate, as insurance to guarantee their obedience. Once this has been achieved, the candidate is primed for a career as a glorious puppet leader, who, like all those who serve their hierarchy, are awarded sufficient status and a degree of wealth, as well as the freedom to wrong others of lesser worth.

Hierarchies always like to tell their populations who they should glorify and who they should demonise. Unsurprisingly, it is mostly people who serve the hierarchies interests that contented slaves are encouraged to glorify, and those that don’t, become worthy of demonising. The usual suspects of their superficial enforced hero worshipping, are of course, the hierarchy themselves (or the puppet class they put in their place), their enforcers and generally any of the glorified wrongdoers who are involved in the daily wrongs that take place in such cultures.

This need to control their population’s adulation or appreciation is crucial for hierarchies, as if their populations were to be influenced by others that do not glorify wrongdoers, then they run the risk of turning their contented slaves into discontented ones, and they are much more difficult and costly to deal with. Our modern cultures are filled with status seekers in every field, and with fame, wealth and status all up for grabs, many are encouraged to look up to these shallow, superficial tools of our hierarchies, simply because they gain rewards for their obedience. But no matter who we glorify, many of us occasionally like to seek justice, so hierarchies always have a great need for security, as their victims often attempt to right the wrongs of our prolific wrongdoers. This makes it always laughable when hierarchies declare they are beloved for their deeds, while they are surrounded by security to protect themselves from those at the receiving end of those deeds.

Groups that concentrate their power into the hands of a tiny percentage of their population are much easier to take over or even destroy than any group that empowers all within them. This is just one of the many great weaknesses of social hierarchies. Once a hierarchy has enslaved their populations to serve their interests, it becomes a lot easier for their successors to step into the role of chief slavemaster without too much resistance, as the role has already been established and gained value/acceptance within their populations. For this reason, succession is the preferred method of master making, but any power vacuum often attracts other status seekers to fill any coveted positions. When a master’s position has been established, many others, outwith the planned successor, can attempt to claim all the benefits of being that particular slavemaster for themselves.

Even foreign invaders that infiltrate, defeat or destroy an established hierarchy can use the established system of succession as an easier way to take control of a population, compared to using an invasion force to defeat a whole population. Adopting the ignorances that have already been established by the previous hierarchy can give an air of legitimacy in the minds of any slave population that has come to value those ignorances. Adding to the already established ignorances and discounting some of them over time, will meet much less resistance from a population than forcing them to replace one set with another overnight.

Our modern social hierarchies maintain their contented slaves by drastically reducing their choices in life, while presenting them with superficial choices instead. Mass deceit is used as a way to convince them that they are a free people who are not as controlled as they really are. When slaves believe they are free, yet think nothing of handing over vast quantities of their wealth, time and power to their hierarchy throughout their lives, then these human being have been successfully reduced to serving the base desires of a few over their own, and this is the goal of all social hierarchies. When they have convinced most of their population to value their servitude to a few, these contented slaves will create more contented slaves in their offspring, and by convincing their own children to value such obedience without question, it makes it much easier for a hierarchy to control successive generations.

As all social hierarchies are superficial by nature, social status breeds these superficial people who are consumed with appearance at the cost of reality on almost every level. So their behaviours, understandings, relationships, values and even their sense of self can be at odds with reality. When we lose who and what we are within a culture of adulterated worth, then those losses can be very difficult to regain. When we are in life-threatening or extreme situations, the facades that many adopt from their social hierarchy are stripped away, as people are a lot more honest and open with one another when the superficial nonsense they are encouraged to value serves no purpose. Without this barrier of ignorance, we can see each other as the same, so we can often bond with each other more when void of the need to grade each other on any wrongdoer’s spectrum of worth.

Social hierarchies can use our disinterest in reality to their advantage in many ways, but especially when convincing others to kill and steal for them in their orchestrated wars. Many hierarchies even sell the experience of being their henchmen and cannon fodder as a family experience, where people can find belonging and friendship, as long as they jump when told to jump, steal when told to steal and kill when told to kill, all without question, of course. If we are of the mentality that we feel the need to dominate others in order to give ourselves an easier life or personal worth, while the wrongs we commit can go unpunished and even revered, then a social hierarchy is for us.

Wrath or reward, threaten or buy and harm or help are the carrot and stick tactics of encouraging obedience and control. A typical modern social hierarchy use their government to dangle the carrot of wealth and status in front of those that will do exactly what they are told, and the stick of persecution and poverty to those that don’t. The propaganda of “greed is good” starts early in life, even before most of us are forced to endure their education systems, but the constant barrage of nonsense throughout our lives from their propagandists never ends.

For most of us not born into a den of wrongdoers, we will be expected to go through the vetting process of our particular hierarchies if we wish to become as much a part of them as we can. These processes can vary, but all serve the same purpose of feeding the greed of a few at the cost of everyone else. Most of today’s slaves will be expected to repeat the lies their education systems sell. If we do well at repeating, we can get into their higher education systems that are just as poor as their normal ones, but comes with a certificate of highly obedient slave that entitles the holders to be elevated above other slaves.

If we are bad repeaters or even worse than this, if we actually recognise their lies and question them, then we will have to make do with the belittling needed to reduce our worth, and as such be expected to endure more wrongs inflicted upon us by those with more status. Once we escape the indoctrination hell of their education systems, we are expected to become happy taxpayers that value the feeding of the greed of a hierarchy, in exchange for a degree of acceptance and the probability of avoiding excessive harm. If we spend our lives working hard and surrender much of our wealth (and humanity) to serve the interests of the few, we can have it all, as long as all we have can be stolen, taxed, controlled and profited from that is. Fear and guilt are sold to these populations as a way of controlling any real ambition outside the confines of feeding the greed of a few, and many buy it like it’s water in the desert.

Within our cultures of differing worth, ambition and success are reduced to wealth creation, and as long as our hierarchies are getting the major share of that wealth, obedient slaves are labelled as ambitious and successful, while their less obedient slaves are deemed as unambitious and unsuccessful. Puppet billionaires are used as an idealised status seeker to encourage effort and obedience to the master slave system. Yet these “leaders of industry” are just slaves in better cages than most, as it is their master’s money that gives them their elevated worth.

Many modern social hierarchies like to sell the idea that anyone can become very wealthy and achieve high status. It is this lie that helps to motivate many slaves to value these systems and feed the greed of a few. It is, of course, impossible for a meaningful percentage of any such population to achieve this, as it would dilute the status that hierarchies value so much. As a result of this particular lie, we are bombarded with these mostly fictitious, never-ending examples of those that came from low status to achieve great wealth and status, like they are the norm when they are anything but. They are paraded like carrots dangled in front of donkeys to make them work harder, and used to convince their populations that if they too value their servitude to the greed of a few and work harder than others, then they too can achieve their version of success.

The few who do achieve great wealth and status (outside of most who handed it on a silver platter) always need a bit of help and luck, not to mention being in the right place at the right time, as well as being willing to jump through the hoops their hierarchy demands they jump through. But examining this ruins the narrative of “success” packaged in their form of rags-to-riches stories. Social hierarchal cultures must sell the idea that if only all of their slaves work as hard as they do (so not very,) then we too could have it all. However, when it comes to these cultures, hard work means very little.

Imagine a social hierarchal culture as a 100-meter race where those who reach the finish line are the “winners” to be glorified within the hierarchy. We don’t all start at the starting line, some start this race already finished or at the finishing line, with snipers ready to kill anyone with morals from getting too close to the line. While others may as well be at the other side of the world for all the chance they have of even getting into the race. Yet we are, and no doubt always will be, bombarded with the nonsense of the social climbing dogma, by cultures that sell attainable social status as a way of appeasing any discontent for a master/slave system. But by revering differing worth, we encourage inequality and the glorification of greed, and the wrongdoings it requires.

Our social hierarchal education systems promote ignorances, their justice systems promote injustices, and their political systems promote divisions and tensions, all in order to keep their slaves content with inequality, injustice and productive to the greed of the few. As we will explore the education and justice systems in more detail later, let’s, for now, have a laugh and examine our social hierarchies’ political systems.

Politics at its basic core is a gossip club, whose members want to be popular or seen as more-than. They spend much of their time concerned with who likes or dislikes who, who wants to exploit who, who has leverage over who and who is exchanging favours with who. So just the basic he-said-she-said stuff on steroids, with the addition of an army of enforcers to play god with. Even when those who have good intentions for their populations, get into positions of high-status within any social hierarchy, they can become too in tune with the group’s internal politics over wider objectives.

These political systems are used in a way to maintain and even glorify the malice of social hierarchal structures. Claiming credit from others, while avoiding responsibility for their actions and blaming the consequences of those actions on others, are a standard practice for social hierarchies. Governments, monarchs, dictators or whatever our social hierarchies wish to call themselves or their competing hierarchies, are all pretty much of a muchness. Fictions are great for pretending one social hierarchy is more advanced than another.

The dictatorship is often now reserved for any competing hierarchy that refuses to bow to the will of a more dominant one, yet all social hierarchies are dictatorships, as the few always dictate to the many, no matter what words they use to define themselves or how many pointless elections they stage. By creating a just-sounding superficial political identity for their populations to identify with, social hierarchies can champion these identities as a way of steering their victims away from their true master/slave reality. With competing social hierarchies using different fictions to hide their dictatorships behind, they can always rely on having an enemy by adopting differing political identities to maintain a fear-based dependency within their slaves’ minds.

Our glorified wrongdoers have many words to describe their master/slave social structures, depending on the particular narratives they wish to sell. Calling a social hierarchy a democracy does not make it democratic, or calling it socialism does not make it socialistic. These are just ideas or fictions that are sold to enslaved populations in an attempt to convince them that they are not part of a master/slave culture, and help them believe they are part of some kind of community that is so different from others. This aids in the divisions all social hierarchies need to thrive. Social hierarchies rarely call themselves what they are, and instead like to declare themselves as various isms or cracies to distinguish themselves from competing ones, but this is like comparing poo for a horse with poo from a cow, at the end of the day, it’s all just poo.

Speaking of poo, let’s try to contain ourselves as we delve into the hilarious world of voting in elections for political groups and individuals, as a method of appeasing an enslaved population’s desire to end or lessen their servitude to the greed of a few. The system of slaves voting for their masters’ puppets every few years is sold as representational governing. This allows many of our glorified wrongdoers to somehow sell themselves as democratic, but when all those governing have to do what their masters tell them to do, it renders the whole process of this farce to an act of theatre that is only valued by many of our more suggestible minds.

Now, of course, this is not how social hierarchies sell their voting systems to their populations, as everyone is asked to take this nonsense very seriously in order to try and legitimise the whole process. Well, everyone who is deemed a valued member of their population, that is, as not all get to participate. One of the most ridiculous and common lies used to encourage slave populations to distract themselves from addressing their true oppressors (in favour of miring themselves within their hierarchy’s political soap operas) is to pretend that their ancestors gave their lives for the right to vote and to serve some great purpose, instead of just engaging in every wrong at the behest of their money monopolists.

The standard approach to giving a population some kind of superficial say in the individuals or groups who will pretend to “serve” them is to present them with at least two main options. The option of having individual/group X or individual/group Y as the face of their dictators may hold great meaning for some, but not all. Both X and Y individuals or groups will claim all sorts to gain any kind of win, but both will do exactly what they are told to do by the hierarchies they serve, should they gain these puppetry positions. If they do not, then they tend not to last very long, or even get into the position of serving their hierarchy in the first place.

Many of the individuals who prove to be worthy of serving the greed of a few are cherry-picked for their ability to sell a lie or for their susceptibility in believing them. Hence why such cultures promote liars (who try to deny reality) and idiots (who don’t want to accept reality), above all others. When representing any social hierarchy, the ability to value or sell a contrived reality, along with the careful construction of social respectability, is important in the theatres of deceit that are the politics of differing worth.

Our social hierarchy’s political systems do a great job in disengaging their populations in the practices of their social structures, by focusing on distractions and mostly irrelevant nonsense. The more of their slaves any social hierarchy can convince to vote for gross wrongdoers x or gross wrongdoers y, to become the CEO of their masters corporations that trade in wrongdoing, the fewer people they have opposing their wrongs in a more effective manner. As many of their slaves waste their time on the cycles of the changing faces of their wrongdoers public puppetry, in return for a patronising pat on the head for being good slaves with notions of upholding their moral duty (as long as those morals champion wrongdoing), the more suggestible slaves are encouraged to belittle the less suggestible for not participating in the farce that is their dictators puppet selections.

With much of their slave class’s efforts and focus on their political entertainment systems that sell little but lies to mask their wrongdoing, social hierarchies can drastically limit any real political threat to their control. The so-called democratic process of choosing our dictator’s mouthpiece is ridiculous, like being cornered by a gang of thugs and being told you are going to be attacked, but in the name of a democratic process, we are going to allow you to choose who does the attacking, thug X or thug Y. But the delusion of choice will always be a choice for some. Even if a population were to be given any real choice in a vote, it is rendered pointless when there is zero verification of any vote by its participants. A small child could construct a voting system that allows its participants to verify their votes, but denying this ability is the reason social hierarchies use the facade of voting to appease any desire for real social improvements from their populations.

Social hierarchies are somewhat all the same, but as this doesn’t stop them from selling themselves and their competitors as anything from a great and wonderful democracy to an evil dictatorship, let’s take a look at the ones that call themselves a democracy. This is all the fashion with today’s glorified wrongdoers, as it arguably works best at producing contented slaves. Democracy is supposed to value social equality, so right away, we know this flies in the face of the very principles of any social hierarchy. This makes democracy obviously impossible within these social structures, but remember we are dealing with bare-faced liars who would sell any lie in exchange for social status, so this does not prevent the idea from being used to manipulate others, even if the reality is obvious to many.

One member, one vote, is the mantra of a democratic social group where all have an equal say in how the group functions. But, of course, this is far too close to equality for any social hierarchy, so instead, they use the vastly more corruptible system of representative democracy, where one individual is somehow supposed to represent thousands or even millions of individuals.

Not exactly the greatest anti-corruption measures then, but that’s kind of the point. In a true democracy, wrongdoers would have to corrupt or influence a large percentage of individuals to achieve their wrongs, but a representative democracy makes wrongdoing thousands or even millions of times easier, making it ideal for any social hierarchy to assume business as usual, while it acts morally superior to its competitors. As these cultures engage with the ceremonial ritual of voting for their latest dictator’s friends every few years, our glorified wrongdoers get to ensure little threat to their control and dominance, just like any other dictatorship.

In It Together

Arguably, we cannot blame our cultures of slavery on the slavemasters alone, as they are almost always fewer in number than their slaves. Obviously, individuals who resist their enforced servitude to the few can be easily picked off when most people within a large group are mostly content to go along with serving the interests of that few. However, we could argue that the masses within these cultures of greed hold at least some level of responsibility for their own enslavement by tolerating their glorified wrongdoers, instead of bonding together to resist their oppressors and hold them accountable for their crimes.

Slavemasters can take advantage of our desire to avoid harm, but if we are to challenge our glorified wrongdoers, we must accept that harm will befall us either way, as inflicting harm is what enslavers do. Social hierarchies use their most obedient slaves to inflict most of the harm they benefit from, so as long as our slaves are willing to harm one another in order to glorify our most heinous of wrongdoers, we will continue with such cycles.

Maybe most of us are more than happy to accept and participate in our cultures of wrongdoing as long as we are far from most of the harm. So maybe it is just a matter of the degree of collective harm we are willing to accept before we challenge such behaviours. For some, it may be better to be harmed resisting enslavement than to be harmed serving it, as aiding in our slave systems just ensures its continuation.

Many of us are content to live with gross wrongdoing in exchange for the lie of a future that we will never have, but for some, it is better to return a wrong to the wrongdoer than to accept the wrong. Now, of course, we are maybe being a little harsh here on the enslaved, as hierarchies may be smaller in number than their slaves, but they are usually the largest organised group within any population, and recruits from those they enslave in order to buy a level of appeasement. So any slave revolt is almost always outmatched in size as well as wealth, resources, weaponry, influence and propaganda, compared to any hierarchy. A small group of slaves stand little chance against such odds, and every slave population is littered with the corpses of those who tried to aid their fellow human beings. However, when a population of slaves unite, they always pose a threat to even the largest of empires, even if it is just to ignite the concept of resistance to bondage within their own or other slave populations.

There is, always has been, and always will be more honest and benevolent folk who are capable of backing up their good intent with not only words, but deeds. Some will go to great lengths to avoid engaging with our social hierarchies status seekers, while others get involved with them voluntarily in a belief that they can genuinely make a difference for genuine good (as opposed to the superficial form that is regurgitated by almost every self-absorbed, malicious status seeker).

Some will achieve a few goals to a degree, but most will find dealing with our glorified wrongdoers to be a thankless task. So thankless to the point of causing endless offence to our malicious cousins, should we side too far with the truth or justice? The truly righteous can expect derogation, defamation, dismissal and death should their good intent interfere with the interests of the unrighteous. And this practice is played out all over the world within ever social hierarchy on a daily basis, in order to prop up the fragile foundations of lies they are all built on.

We could argue that our political systems are used for the benefit of our hierarchies’ descendants, as a kind of inheritance fund that keeps the flow of wealth and power in the hands of more-thans and away from less-thans, even though less-thans can eventually creep into all social hierarchies to a degree, using the same practices as those within them. Leaving the development and day-to-day running of any society in the hands of a few who hide behind corporations, and the politicians who represent those corporations, is always going to end the same way, with the glorification of wrongdoing and the demonization of rightdoing, regardless if a few with good intent infiltrate their ranks or not. Instead of making their social structures less oppressive, those with a degree of good intentions are often used by our hierarchies as a “typical” example of those involved within them, to try to mask the true nature of the majority of their glorified wrongdoers.

Our hierarchies political systems will always be saturated by those who strive to be involved for personal gain and the malicious intent that often comes with it, but we can’t discount all those with good intent to make a positive difference to their communities and sacrificed much to advance their social cultures, as just mere window dressing, even if the results of their efforts gain little or are overturned by the proceeding generations of glorified wrongdoers.

For every individual who succeeded in achieving any kind of progress, there are no doubt countless more who failed. Not through lack of effort but due to luck, their time, circumstance and the slow evolving nature of social hierarchies. There is only so much that good intent can achieve within a master/slave culture mired in ill intent. Social hierarchies often hamstring those outwith their inner communities to limit their chance of getting into any real position of power. It is no coincidence that positions of power often go to those who are family members, or even those of so-called secret societies within societies, in order to maintain their exclusive nature and profitable narratives.

Secret groups, and groups within groups are plentiful when it comes to the chase to feel special with the use of exclusion, and our money monopolist have created and control most of them. Secrecy is very important to our glorified wrongdoers, as without it, few of their slaves and followers who serve their interests, would be so keen on glorifying their wrongs if they knew the truth. Now, there may be some secret groups that have all the best intentions in the world and use secrecy in order to avoid persecution from the ruling group of mass wrongdoers, which is obviously a necessity.

However, the great strength of secrecy from any oppressor’s perspective becomes a great weakness within any group, as groups that value secrecy are so much easier to exploit than groups that value transparency. That’s not to say secrecy for any group can’t be very useful in achieving their goals, especially in avoiding accountability. All social hierarchies have their secret groups that scurry around in the background and shadows to allow their hierarchies to take advantage of plausible deniability. Many of us champion governments, monarchies or religions while being oblivious to those who control these corporate entities and their wrongdoing. These fictions, just like many others, are used as facades of righteousness for our glorified wrongdoers to cower behind as they get on with the business of harming others, void of their population’s critical eye.

The facades of social hierarchies’ political systems and their politicians who serve themselves, while pretending to serve others, are always promoted by their propagandists (or their mass mainstream media, as we now prefer to call them) as existing for the good of their populations, despite the consistently obvious truths of their intent.

Many who have worth within these populations come to value these liars who sell their excessive greed as not only something that is good for all, but something that all should aspire to. Although if a world where everyone would sell their granny in exchange for a little wealth and status is really something most people want, then perhaps we should all be encouraging those hierarchies with nuclear weapons to start firing them everywhere, and let another species have a go at this whole living thing.

Honest journalism has no place within social hierarchies, so only those prepared to repeat what they are told to repeat will hold any “journalistic” worth, as our pseudo-journalists are reduced to useful liars or idiots. Thus, being malicious or ignorant is a prerequisite for the job. This however does not stop honest, determined, brave or even naive journalists investigating the truths no social hierarchy wants their slaves to hear, but many of them will be prevented from publishing their findings by their masters who will use threats to their careers, families and lives if they step out of the very confined lines of what the deem as acceptable and what has to be censored, in order to maintain their hierarchies lies.

It is perhaps easier to get away with the same lie if the lie only happens once within one average life span, but the lies that are repeated far too often in the same time period can wear thin, even among the most obedient of slaves. Promoting a lie to an opinion, and then selling that lie masked as an opinion in order to make it more believable, is a common practice among our status seekers.

Opinion-base systems work great at avoiding the truth, and as the truth is the enemy of all social hierarchies, their systems rely heavily on opinions in order to sell their lies. All the lying industries they produce are heavy on opinion that is combined with an elevated status in an attempt to equate more validity to a lie than the truth. So we endure these political, educational, medical, journalistic…etc., industries, that are awash with glorified wrongdoers’ opinions that must be valued by anyone who wish to be a valued member of their group. Even hierarchal scientific industries that claim to value the truth more than any other industry suffer from the same practices.

As hierarchies produce an array of temporary fictions that many of us attach our identity to, perhaps it is only if we are ignorant of the fact that these fictions are only temporary, that we can come to truly value them. The belonger within us all may have something to do with valuing mere concepts that serve the few at the cost of ourselves and all around us, over the blatant truths that lay before us.

Our need for social interaction may make most of us susceptible to preferring to belong to a group of slaves, rather than living free in isolation. So we end up pandering to and valuing the superficial belonging that all social hierarchies sell. Due to the nature of social hierarchal groups rewarding those who pander to the hierarchy’s lies and wrongs, they end up with predominantly fawning flatterers that are void of integrity, in positions of elevated worth in order to support their master’s narratives, wishes and delusions. As few of those valued by a hierarchy are willing to risk their own degree of worth by challenging the wrongs and lies that they are paid to repeat and champion, mass wrongdoing can easily thrive.

When we overindulge in our ignorances, malice and ego, we rely heavily on lies to justify our actions, hence the behaviours we can observe in every hierarchy. Every lie or fiction we create only exists within the minds of a specific group of people and in a specific time and place, as only those who hear of or think of the lie, can come to value it. The great value that status seekers place on ignorances and lies may appear like a waste of time for many unsullied by the ignorance of differing worth, and in the wider scheme of things they are a total waste of time, however, for our glorified wrongdoers, there is little that benefits them more than the perceptions of their ignorances and lies being valued by others, and the very real advantages those perceptions afford them.

While on the subject of time, we can’t avoid our status seekers’ obsession with time wasting. Hierarchies waste their slaves’ time as well as their own with all their nonsense, although within the minds of our status seekers, limiting the development of their group, themselves and their slaves, is no doubt worth their elevated worth. For many, it is better to be a king in hell, than an equal in paradise.

Making others wait and waste their time, is a practice that is rife within hierarchal cultures, as in the status seekers mind, this ability to waste the short time others have in life, makes them feel more powerful that those they steal time from. Our time thieves often go to great lengths to steal others’ time, and such petty and vindictive minds will often take great pleasure in doing so. Masters forcing their slaves to labour and pleasure them are all examples of robbing others of their time, and of course, the endless murdering of millions of people is the ultimate way to steal time from others. Anyway, back to the selling of lies.

Getting enough people to adopt their perceptions is always a toil for every hierarchy, until they have broken enough slaves into indoctrinating their own children into becoming obedient slaves. Many practices are used to achieve this, and as censorship is glorified lying, it is no wonder our tyrants love it so much, and sell it as a necessity for anything from moral to security reasons. However, the real reason is mostly to hide their wrongs from any real scrutiny.

The farce of heavily censored populations valuing their liars’ lies, even when told they live in “the free world” by their tyrants, would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic. Although the modern mantra of selling tyranny as “the price of freedom” is always worth a giggle. The truth strips us of our ignorances whether we like it or not, and censorships allows us to stick our heads in the sand, so we can hold on to the ignorances our hierarchies sell us. Censorship aids our glorified wrongdoers and their minions, and by seeing no evil, hearing no evil and speaking no evil, we allow evil to reign.

We cannot expect much more than glorified wrongdoing and all-encompassing nonsense from cultures that are governed by the nodding heads and clapping hands of human beings who have been reduced to sycophants. Social hierarchies are where the disloyal demand loyalty, the selfish demand selflessness, the cowardly demand bravery, the lawless demand order, the unjust demand justice, the dishonest demand honesty, the dishonourable demand honour, the untrustworthy demand trust, the immoral demand morality, the insignificant demand significance and the useless demand usefulness.

Even if any hierarchal culture had a thousand years of social advancement (well, as much as they are limited to) behind it, no matter how advanced social hierarchies may perceive themselves, they have an innate desire to maintain their master/slave cultures as their ignorance of differing worth is at the very heart of what they are. Within such cultures, it just takes one moment in time with a stroke of a pen to undo generations of struggle in achieving social advances. The same generation that valued one particular freedom can be encouraged or forced to value the restriction of that same freedom, and even hate those who still value it. This is how fickle our superficial groups that value differing worth are.

The use of the perceived injustice ignorance can halt and even reverse social advances, as morality, like justice, is very fluid within any social hierarchy. This is often the case with many of the individuals within them, but morality can be fluid in most (if not all) of us, as most of us who believe our morals are set in stone have not had the misfortune or fortune (depending on our interpretation) of having our beliefs exposed.

We must also bear in mind that the environments of those at the controlling end of a social hierarchy are not exactly one of peace and love to all. More often than not, they are full of the treachery, deceit, backstabbing, wrongdoing and the one-upmanship that we would expect from status seekers that glorify wrongdoing. With many willing to sell their first-born in exchanged for some wealth and status, we can imagine any child born into such an environment will do well to reach adulthood with a healthy respect for their fellow human beings that have been labelled as less-than. Many are conditioned from an early age to see others as less-than, and can even face ridicule and mockery for displaying the empathy and compassion we all share, to those deemed unworthy of it.

Those abound in wealth and status often fixate on the egocentric idea of some great and glorious legacy that they pass on to their children (often with most or all the bad bits left out, as is the way with glorifying), saddling them with the burden of living up to some imaginary ideal and the expectation to match or surpass their glorified ancestry. This can often encourage many to surpass the level of wrongdoing that those who came before them achieved. Yet if we use the percentages of suggestibility, then there will always be some from that 20% that are born into our most glorified of wrongdoers, who will not buy into the lies of superiority or adopt the ignorance of differing worth, even when brought up within communities and environments that benefit hugely from such an ignorance. So if our nations of slaves lack the ability or drive to create a culture that values equality over extreme inequality, then maybe our only hope for such a culture lies within the 20% from the very hierarchies that lord over such slaves. So yeah! We’re doomed. Well, to be fair, there are genuine examples of such individuals from the glorified classes that attempt to balance the scales of injustice and inequality to some degree, but as they are very much up against an overpowering, malicious force, perhaps we should be grateful for any such attempt, regardless of its level of impact.

If we examine our modern world and get back to our secret societies or religions for a moment, we can observe the indoctrination of the most influential individuals within these societies of gross wrongdoing, who have been lured into our medium of exchange monopolists’ (MOEM) secret cults, as they all sing from the same hymn sheet. By promoting the most corruptible and psychologically weak who join these “secret societies” as “the most talented” in any particular field, our MOEM can control what influences their slave populations the most.

As hero worship is part of valuing the ignorance of differing worth, many are encouraged from childhood to engage in this ignorance in order to use their hierarchy’s manufactured “heroes” to influence their world view, among other things. Of course, some of these “influencers” may well have good intent to a degree, and take their oaths in ignorance of the true level of wrongdoing our MOEM indulge in, but all are expected to play their roles in exchange for their degree of elevated worth. Those with more of a conscience may even wish to side with right, but it rarely ends well for them if they become too righteous. With thousands of years of secret societies killing millions in order to control human worth, our planet is now riddled with weak-minded, obedient people in positions of influence, hence the joke that we are today.

As hierarchies try to convince their slaves that their enforcers, puppets and entertainers are heroes, they attempt to rob recognition from the true heroes that exist within the lives of many. Like the parents who sacrifice for their children, or the children that sacrifice for their parents, or the people who are always there for others when they need them.

Our status seekers try to sell the idea of heroes as only those with wealth and status, as this is something they have in abundance. If integrity were the measure of a hero, then our status seekers would struggle to be anyone’s hero, hence why it is not. We can tell a lot about a society by those it admires the most, and as servile entertainers are the heroes of our hierarchal cults, it tells us all we need to know about them.

Modern Slave Life

Let’s examine more closely the average expectations our modern social hierarchies inflict upon those born with their master’s branding and within their borders. Once we have entered this beautiful world of abundance, our parents or carers are expected to register us as the property of our hierarchies, who hide behind their corporations, in order to mask their master/slave relationships.

So we are given birth certificates that are little more than our master branding us as their property, to be used by its owners. Few may question why there are no born certificates, as birth means beginning, so should be the day we are conceived. Thus, should we all not have a birthday on the day we were conceived and a bornday on the day we were born?

Well, it’s all just manipulation of language in order to manipulate the human beings that value it, but more about how admiralty law is used to enslave and exploit populations later. Once we reach the grand old age of around 5, we are expected to spend at least a decade within their education (indoctrination) systems that are little more than propaganda cathedrals.

Here we are expected to worship our great and glorious masters, swallow every lie and bow to their every whim. Those of us who comply with the social conditioning are deemed intelligent and worthy of some status, while those not on board with the lies are deemed less intelligent and only worthy of low-status. Once out of these dogmatic education systems, many put value in the propaganda of their hierarchy’s media that sells them their daily dose of doom, in order to instil fear that can only be abated by their heroic hierarchy.

Depending on the status inflicted upon us, we are divided into competing groups of differing worth that are commonly called the working, middle and upper classes, with lower and upper variants. However, despite the divisions of wealth and status, all classes beneath the hierarchy are expected to feed the greed of the few and are encouraged to blame one another for all the problems that their hierarchy inflicts upon them. Each grouped class often gets their own superficial political party to attach their identity to, in order to prevent them from aspiring to achieving any real social change within their populations.

Even though the political puppets our hierarchies use to hide behind always bow to their hierarchy, regardless of any promised challenge to the norms of excess greed and wrongdoing they may make to their populations, may engage in the electing of their dictator’s puppet farce for a lifetime. After a lifetime of work and being an obedient taxpayer, we might be given just enough of our wealth back to scrape by in our old age, and as our lives of servitude to a few winds down, our social worth gets reduced to our regular participation in voting for our dictator’s puppets. Then, when we discover that we are not immortal after all, our hierarchies come sniffing around for any wealth they can steal from our families after our death.

This is to say nothing of those with zero to negative status, such as the unemployed, the criminalized and those who have no house or the dreaded immigrants who are the scourge of all respectable wrongdoers, and thus are given little to no social worth. These groups are often sold by social hierarchies as the enemies of our obedient taxpayers, and their lowly worth is used as a deterrent to anyone not too keen on obeying their masters.

All of society’s problems (orchestrated by a social hierarchy, where they steal the wealth of their population to feed the greed of the few) are somehow blamed upon groups that have the least amount of wealth and power. And because their education systems are so bad at harnessing inquisitive minds and great at producing servile ones, this lie holds great value among many because the common level of awareness on display within our hierarchal slave populations is so low. Much to our master’s delight.

Jobs, jobs, jobs sound more palatable to most modern ears than slaves, slaves, slaves. Our political hierarchies love to glorify the idea of jobs for the communities they control, not because they care much for the lives of their populations, but jobs create taxpayers that they can use to enrich themselves with. Slaves, slaves, slaves may not have quite the same ring to any politician’s manipulative speeches, and is perhaps less encouraging for many to seek such a title. But there is little difference between the rebranded debt slave system and the traditional slave system, especially when it comes to the distribution of wealth and labour, as well as who is worthy of being a sex slave and who is not.

In the traditional system, slaves were expected to work for their masters in whatever capacity they were told, while in the rebranded debt slave system, all slaves are encouraged to believe that they get to choose what they wish to do with their lives, and as every choice involves feeding the greed of the few who have monopolised any such choice, their masters always profit. This way, our modern-day slaves do much more for the few than any traditional slave system could.

As being an employee or employer has replaced being a slave, being unemployed can hold great worth, but unemployment is used as a control mechanism, as 100% employment gives employees more power to pick and choose their desired vocation, and could lead to many jobs not getting done to maintain the luxury lifestyles the glorified few adore so much. Any group can have all contribute in some way, or to put it in terms our modern slaves and masters will understand, have 100% employment.

But with a smaller percentage of unemployed people to overly belittle and treat worse than most, it encourages others to obey their masters in order to avoid such a fate. In order for our slavemasters or modern-day corporate masters to lord over their slaves, unemployment is one of the tools used to maintain power and control over their workers. As all social hierarchies have limited roles to be filled at the glorified end of these societies, many compete for these limited positions of high-status slaves in order to limit their hardships, and there will always be someone willing to fill such glorified roles, no matter the immorality of the role.

Even if we spend our whole lives working, and as taxation is glorified thievery, most of us will be working just to maintain the basics of food, water and shelter. Working to survive is not exactly the ideal of any advanced human group. Even hunter-gatherers surpass these limitations with ease, but as hierarchies require less-thans to serve more-thans, we can’t create less-thans without treating others poorly.

Many fear unemployment due to the significant drop in the wealth and status it can bring, but for those capable of existing on very little of either, it’s not always such a catastrophe. One individual’s impoverished wealth and status of unemployment is another individual’s freedom from such nonsense. When we are of little to no worth to a group and care little for their deluded perception, we can be free from most of the ignorances of that group, especially when we know our own worth and aren’t too concerned if those we share our time with share our level of awareness.

Modern debt-slaves are required to not only have enthusiasm for their servitude to the greed of a few, but are also expected to have a passion for it. Any normal human being that has a normal reaction to being exploited is considered to have a bad attitude and, therefore, is undesirable for anything above the lowest positions in society, even when they possess more knowledge, skill and awareness within any field than any obedient slaves who are awarded the titles of expert. This encourages many to join the cheerleaders of tyranny. Even selling the notion that quitting is a bad thing helps our wrongdoers to manipulate their victims into accepting their mistreatment.

Not quitting on ourselves or something we really value has its worth, but quitting on something we are told to value or things that are not truly worth our time and effort holds great value. The joy of quitting or letting go of things that are not as important to us as others would like us to believe is very underappreciated in cultures that serve the interests of a few. All social hierarchies put great importance on the unimportant, so there is always plenty worth quitting on.

Goal seekers may not appreciate the joy of being goalless, and status seekers may not appreciate the joy of being statusless, especially when all obedient slaves are encouraged to value their master’s goals and status. The joy of pursuing what we value or find interesting, over the goals or status laid before us by our self-serving hierarchies, may be a joy few status seekers wish to aspire to, but such things can be harder to kill in some than it is in others.

Cultures of greed encourage their populations to be constantly seeking something in order to validate their worth. Many are persuaded to believe that their happiness and contentment rely on obeying their hierarchy’s interests, and are encouraged to hold contempt for those who have little to no interest in any of the pursuits that pander to those interests. By following their falsehoods, fads and fashions in order to attain the superficial trinkets, titles, positions, status and wealth on offer to the most obedient, many are more than willing to surrender to their masters’ conditioning in order to fulfil their base desires and be perceived as more-than.

Just another Sex Cult

We (and other animals) use social status for the same reasons, for males to monopolise sex with females. Well, that and resources, but as having more resources than other males is used to attract females, it arguably all comes down to sex. And as sexual exploitation is a standard practice and the goal of social hierarchies, all cults are sex cults.

Many of us may like to think we are superior to other animals, but we are no different to any other animal that makes use of social status for sex. Politics is just our males desperately attempting to position themselves above each other so that they can get priority over females and resources, and get away with using and abusing their fellow human beings with the acceptance, or even blessing, of those around them. Of course, we are all capable of uniting as a group of equals that respect one another, but no hierarchy has any interest in equality.

Those of us who wish to harm others, or have such fragile self-worth that we need to belittle others in order to feel special or worthy in some way, are more attracted to the master/slave cultures our hierarchies champion. Within these environments, many are ready and willing to praise those who give them worth and harm anyone who threatens their precious social status. This creates a snake pit of sycophants, flatterers, liars, backstabbers and general all-round wrongdoers who infect all social hierarchies. When we are surrounded by others who commit many wrongs and avoid any consequences, it will encourage many of us to engage in wrongdoing, as well as find justifications to excuse our actions.

There is no end to inciting divisions in the cults our status seekers form in order to sell themselves as masters, and others as their slaves. The only difference between a cult and a culture is its size. As cults’ populations are vastly outnumbered and often consumed by the larger population they exist within, cultures must belittle cults for using the same practices they themselves use, because they become a competitor for their slaves obedience. Cultural genocide is a common practice our glorified wrongdoers partake in, as they must try to force as many new slaves as they can into valuing their master’s cult over their own to ensure obedience and control behaviour.

However, when a recently enslaved population proves too difficult to brainwash into the glory of their oppressors, more genocides and population clearances can be used to achieve control. Land grabs are as common as status seekers within our cultures of greed, and the tried and tested method of driving large populations from their homes in order to install their own set of obedient slaves, who have already been indoctrinated into serving their hierarchy’s greed, will thus feed that greed more effectively than any population that knows their oppressors’ true nature.

Many modern-day social hierarchies sell their cults of democracy, socialism or whatever nonsense term they can get away with, to convince their populations that they are part of their masters’ political systems, when all they will ever be are their pawns. Each lie or delusion that their slaves buy from their hierarchy’s true nature has the added benefit of being used to install hate within competing populations. Orchestrated hate makes it easier for our hierarchies to recruit wrongdoers from their obedient slaves who take the bait.

This ensures many will inflict any wrong upon anyone their master wish to violate. Their fictitious group identities are little different from any other delusion that hierarchies use for the same purposes. No matter the lies in use, it always comes down to social hierarchies manipulating their populations for their own benefit, this will never change as long as social status holds such great value. There are no democratic or socialist countries on our planet, they are all just social hierarchies that use their lying industries to sell their master/slave cultures as anything other than what they are: tyranny.

Populations under the heel of a social hierarchy will always have plenty to oppose, but by removing all opposition to their wrongdoing and creating a superficial political system, whether we call it a dictatorship or a democracy, our glorified wrongdoers can ensure they achieve a monopoly on power and control over their populations that buy into their servile political structures. With our modern social hierarchies being mostly pseudo-hierarchies that our real clandestine social hierarchies use to control their populations, these puppet masters can have much more control over a much longer period of time, when their slaves don’t even know of their existence. No one can complain or seek justice against those who are well hidden from view.

This is the role of the puppet. To take their population’s ridicule and direct it elsewhere, even at themselves, should they be told to, as long as it is well away from the true hierarchy. As all lies die with their liars, and the truth needs no voice to live forever, hierarchies must constantly produce new generations of liars to keep their lies going.

These deceivers champion their believers, while demonizing all who recognise them to aid in their conveyor belt of valued liars. As our lying industries rely on their opinion based cultures to render most of what we do as meaningless (outside serving the few, by attaching status to lies that are sold as opinions), these cultures can spend generations mired in the opinions of their malicious deceivers.

Our social ideologies are a great way of distracting slaves from the realities of their hierarchy, as they allow the wrongs that hierarchies always engage in to be sold as aligning to the nonsense of the particular ideology they are trying to sell. Many of our modern-day social hierarchies use ideologies that are just rambling glorifications and demonizations from the habitual liars that frequent the political spaces of our glorified wrongdoers.

As all social hierarchies are dictatorships, the popularity and acceptance of these pseudo-democracies we have seen springing up over the last couple of centuries is down to the fact that they have indoctrinated their populations into valuing them, by forcing them to spend a decade or more with their paid liars since the mid-1800s.

The scale of nonsense that is parroted by those mired within these political systems and their sister lying industries is a mine of comedy gold, but of course, those with the malice and power to murder with impunity are rarely too fond of having their nonsense recognised, never mind ridiculed. Humour is often a struggle for status seekers as they must always appear to take their own lies seriously. The hysterical group response to the mere presence of the glorified individuals that take on the role of the public face of a social hierarchy is as superficial as all involved in their heavily orchestrated performances that are always on display within all hierarchal cultures.

Their manufactured “adoring” crowds who, are coerced by a combination of fear, greed and ignorance into playing the role of worshippers of their human gods in an attempt to convince others to do the same, can be observed within every culture of greed, as they stage their ceremonies that celebrate gross inequality and injustice. The very common practice among status seekers of surrounding themselves with flatterers, in order to elevate their perceived worth with anyone who cares to take their performances and lies seriously, is always worth a giggle. Even as much of what they do is staged and rehearsed, they always have their bad actors who stumble from their script. The lying industries of politics and media are used to encourage and celebrate our ridiculous pomposity as a thing of worth.

As immunity to wrongdoing is a perk of the more-than, our modern hierarchies that sell themselves as moral in some way have to pretend their wrongdoers are held accountable for their wrongs. Our social hierarchies’ public forums are deafeningly silent when it comes to reporting on the workings and daily wrongdoings of their glorified wrongdoers, as we would expect when every public forum is owned by them.

Our modern-day media with their pseudo-journalists that trade in lies and orchestrated narratives, serve up their hierarchies political pantomimes (that are as well scripted as any theatrical performance) as something to take seriously, in an attempt to convince their more gullible slaves into believing their great social system hold their so-called leaders (the puppet hierarchy) accountable in some way, even if it is only to the very slimmest of degree.

Whenever there is discontent among the slave classes, our hierarchies’ puppets are often sacrificed in order to appease any unrest. But “sacrificed” in the political sense of being given a golden handshake that comes with wealth, status and another lucrative position within their masters lying industries, as a reward for their efforts in feeding the greed of a few. There are many of us who would not mind volunteering for that kind of “sacrifice”. Few within their lying industries dare to question the fact that the resignation of an individual or two never addresses the endemic failures of the systems any social hierarchy creates.

However, as the point of such systems is to harm, these “failures” are only ever recognised as such when they attract enough public attention to cause enough embarrassment that exposes their moral hypocrisy or pseudo-justice. Once any public interest has been appeased or diverted, it is back to the business as usual of mass wrongdoing for our hierarchies and their minions, as each puppet position has an endless queue of replacements all jockeying for their turn on the golden stage of theatrical political manipulation.

Pseudo-democracies produce the most contented slaves, as slaves of the mind pose little to no bodily danger to their masters. This is the great attraction of pseudo-democracies for all of our gross wrongdoers. In a more (and we can’t emphasise the word “more” enough) honest social hierarchy, the slave classes often knew/know who their masters were/are, but as in a pseudo-democracy where their true masters hide in the shadows, free from any ridicule or scrutiny, few direct their justified hate for the wrongs they experience at those most worthy of it.

One of the many problems with the puppet leaders that are used to create a pseudo-hierarchy, is that they more often than not have even less competence, understanding and obviously integrity than the low bar that is set among those of a real social hierarchy, as political puppets must bow to and play their way through the games of obedience their masters political systems use to weed out those that possess such traits.

Thus, becoming a sycophant is a prerequisite in gaining any worth within them. Although those less influenced by obvious lies and their liars can always play the role of sycophant in order to gain a degree of power within any hierarchy, and once they have gained enough worth to have no need to play up to those of more worth, they can drop the nonsense behaviours that they never came to value.

These more cunning individuals are usually more competent in any position of power than their hierarchies, or those who embrace sycophantism wholeheartedly to become part of them. As with most things, when we have to really work for something, we develop a better understanding of it, as opposed to having it handed to us on a plate or given to us just because we are good at flattering the egos of those in a position to reward such behaviour.

When competing hierarchies engage with one another, those who are merely being used to deliver their master orders can struggle to gain the respect of those who are more than mere mouthpieces within their social hierarchy. Whether a hierarchy uses puppets or not, once a position or fiction has become established to align with the glorifying and demonising practices that support gross inequality, it really doesn’t matter who fills those positions, as long as someone is playing the roles that stabilise control for the hierarchy and their wider hangers-on.

The few or two party systems, where each pretend to oppose one another in order to maintain the interest and obedience of the population (while each party serves the exact same purpose in serving the interests of a few), are played out time and time again all over the world. Even when each and every change in our groups of political performers yields the same results, many still value the illusion.

Social hierarchies political systems are little more than their public relations departments. For slave populations, politics is in effect their national soap operas, filled with actors who learn to repeat the lines that all the actors who came before them repeated. So we get a never-ending drama series that remains the same over time. It’s just the same old tired storylines with different faces. Meaningless speeches overflowing with words that say nothing are all too common within hierarchal politics.

Public figures, puppet leaders and lowly administrators are all reduced to actors in the pantomimes that try to convince a population that inequality and injustice are good. These manufactured political leaders are used to sell tyranny as leadership, and control every field that most of them know little to nothing about. Having a career politician who has never been a teacher or worked in the health industry running an education or public health system is obviously ridiculous. This inevitably leads to gross incompetence, but for any hierarchy, it is better to maintain control of an incompetent society than relinquish control to produce a highly efficient one.

A social hierarchy can fall under the heel of another if their leaders fail to convince their slaves of the importance of defending one slavemaster over another, but taking over any hierarchy can be as easy as eliminating a few dictators or “leaders” as they prefer to call themselves. The idea of leadership is always encouraged by status seekers for many reasons. One of them is to make it easier to dominate others and keep power and control in the hands of a few over generations.

By killing a few “leaders”, a competing hierarchy, group or uprising of slaves can be greatly weakened or conquered, but with a population of people that don’t fall for our status seekers definitions of leadership, they can encourage each other to lead themselves, thus killing a few within such a group can be pointless in halting any opposition. We can argue that the masses of any group who surrender their cause when their leaders are removed are anything from disinterested in their leader’s plans or their leadership in general, to lacking in the courage of their hierarchy’s forced convictions. Although it is the nature of belongers to hitch themselves to any passing wagon.

Leaders (as defined in the true sense of those that benevolently lead, rather than the status seekers definition that malevolently conspires) outwith a social hierarchy, tend to lead by example when void of the ignorance of differing worth or any concern of being surpassed by those they share their knowledge with.

In fact, we could define a leader as someone who wishes to be surpassed by those they aid, whereas the status seekers’ superficial definitions of leadership tend to be mired in exploiting others to serve their own interests. Superficial respect can be translated into genuine respect if our minds value the superficial. Our social hierarchies are only capable of the superficial and forced respect they are renowned for, as we would expect within groups that value inequality and injustice. Thus, genuine respect is scarce within such cultures.

Any adult telling another adult that they have authority over them is always ridiculous, but then again, much of what hierarchies do is ridiculous. So, in order for anyone to take such nonsense seriously, violence is used as the usual method to validate our status seekers’ need to be seen as more-than. However, violence always has the drawback of often being met with violence, so conditioning a slave’s mind into being a contented docile slave is a more palatable strategy for social hierarchies, hence why so many today try to sell themselves as defenders instead of attackers in order to hold the high moral ground.

This is why we get these ridiculous terms like “pre-emptive” attacks from aggressive groups in an effort to try and keep their slaves’ support for their wrongdoing. Our glorified wrongdoers sell these unprovoked attacks as a necessity because they “believed” that their victims would have attacked them in the future. This is akin to rapists claiming that they had pre-emptive sex with their victims, as they believed that their victims would have had sex with them in the future. Thankfully for our modern wrongdoers, many believe such nonsense, as their slaves have been conditioned for decades to believe in obvious lies.

The modern lying industries that are used to condition a free-thinking human being into becoming an obedient slave, brings our hierarchies great value. There are many lies and fictions available to achieve this, but their religions and gods will always be used, no matter the creation of more sophisticated ways to exploit people. We can all pretend that our desires are a god’s desire, so it is all a bit ridiculous that so many believe such a fraud, despite the abundance of evidence available for all to see.

Few populations under a social hierarchy are free from religion to some degree, as religion is so successful at exploiting the inevitability of death and the denial of it to produce obedient slaves. It may be easy to mock grown adults that live their lives at the behest of other adults who claim to represent a magical authority figure that only exists within their minds, but that would be to ignore the very real social conditioning all status-seeking animals engage in. As a social species, we are heavily reliant on relationships, and social hierarchies are little more than the glorification of an abusive relationship.

Most dominant social hierarchies are only dominant because they are the most prolific wrongdoers, and as they rely on a large army to incite violence and commit wrongs upon others, this glorified mass of wrongdoing tends to spiral into imperialism, even if our modern-day liars find the term unfashionable. In fact, imperialism is an inevitability, as any hierarchy that has invested so much in the creation of a large dominant force and gained so much from exploiting its dominance over others, is never going to use this force to keep peace. Instead, it will always be advantageous to use it to steal from more and more groups, so endless wars are always going to be in the interests of any dominant hierarchy. As hierarchies now encourage their obedient slaves to build mini empires within their empire to exploit the efforts of others, many ignore the tyrannical nature of empire in order to align it with their own self-interests.

The glorified dogma of a dominant hierarchy that wishes to spread equality and justice around the world by liberating an oppressed population from their evil dictators is a lie we get on an almost daily basis from our dominant hierarchies and their vassal states in the modern era of endless war. If we were to look at their own populations of slaves, it would appear that these hierarchies only value theoretical freedom and equality for their enemies.

The fact that they can’t even spread freedom and equality within their own borders is always overlooked by their sycophants, as is the fact that the only liberating that these hierarchies are ever interested in is the liberation of resources and control from a competing hierarchy to themselves. That and controlling their money, of course.

Competing social hierarchies strive to become the most dominant one, as dominating others, rather than cooperating with others, is any self-respecting hierarchy’s dream scenario that is fuelled by the drive to fulfil their spiralling delusions of elevated worth. Just as they dominate the lives of their populations with unjust laws, so too with their treaties do social hierarchies agree on which is the most dominant hierarchy. Usually dependent on the military strength of that hierarchy.

This creation of a status among social hierarchies mean there will always be a top spot to strive for (outwith their medium of exchange monopolists, of course). History shows us that there are cycles to the top spot, with hierarchies on the rise and others on the decline, which often results in war between the declining top spot and their replacement. However, as war is just an everyday practice for such groups, it is not exactly a great shock.

Our medium of exchange monopolists (MOEM) may have omitted themselves from their own history books, but they always play their role in the rise and fall of the empires they infect. For many, monopolising human worth is always worth destroying communities for, and when such control is threatened or even lost, any MOEM accumulated riches means it is not too difficult to implement their excess greed elsewhere.

In our game of MOEM’s puppet empires, once top spot has been achieved, we could simplify their cycles starting with a wealthy rise, as production and trade increase due to the monopolies and mass thievery that comes with being the most prolific wrongdoer. This is followed by a period of dominance that has a booming economy, until that succumbs to the more and more excessive greed and gross inequality of wealth and status, which all usury groups are fond of. This often leads to an economic downturn as they become less competitive and less productive as the rulers and their ever-growing army of glorified wrongdoers and sycophants, spend more than they can steal.

In the death throes of our MOEM vassal’s hierarchy top spot, desperate measures and wars ensue in an attempt to halt the inevitable decline, as they are surpassed by a more innovative and productive hierarchy. Such prosperity will always attract the attention of our MOEM, who can easily switch their bases of operation for the mass wrongdoing they need to inflict upon the world, and have the new top hierarchy they own to pay for and supply the enforcers of tyranny that they need to thrive. As the slaves born within their borders become more aware and discontent with their oppression, foreign slaves outside of their borders are often drafted in to prop up the ailing beast of empire in an act of desperation to hold onto their delusions of superiority, as well as to cause the discontent they need to exert more oppressive controls.

With the glorification and widespread deployment of usury, and the accumulative effect of a larger and larger portion of wealth going to fewer and fewer people over the course of a hierarchy’s cycle, these hierarchies secure the certainty of their decline and even collapse. Although the few valued slaves who enrich themselves at the cost of others may still believe greed is good, right up until their victims exercise their vengeance. But many tend to leave any group once they know their exploitations are no longer tolerated, and often move on to use their elevated worth to exploit a different, more accepting population.

When any dominant empire is generations into their reign of terror, they can allow themselves to become overly confident of their superiority and underestimate their slaves and those they wish to encompass into their empire. All empires build up an enormous amount of victims with the motivation to seek justice, and if their victims unite as one, it can cause real problems for even the most dominant of social hierarchy. The big difference in the next change over for top spot that has not been much a factor before within our known history, is the introduction of nuclear weapons, assuming they are real, of course, and not just another lie to ensure fear in slaves.

If the changeover comes with war, as it usually does, we (or those still here) may see if these weapons alter the cycle or just create somewhat more devastation than these changeovers usually cause. Empires will always come and go, but they are all just fictions that our wrongdoers hide behind. When any empire falls, the human beings that are defined by them, don’t all suddenly disappear, they just get consumed by another of our status seekers fictions. The rise and fall of empires may be important to status seekers, but such changing fictions mean nothing to our group behaviours.

Imperialism has become unfashionable (in part due to the somewhat mass awareness of the obvious gross wrongs it requires), but also the idea of having a small group of foreigners from the other side of the planet, enslaving a population and stealing their resources, is hard to sell as moral and right. Hence, why committing the same wrongs by using a small group of people from that same population is now much more palatable. Therefore, our modern imperialists must no longer publicly celebrate their aggressive, malicious intent, and instead go through the pretence of selling themselves as defenders, instead of aggressors, in order to gain public support for their genocides.

This is where false flags, fictions and lies come into their own, as any aggressors can kill a few of their own slaves, blame it on their targeted group and then pretend that their ensuing raping and pillaging of their targeted communities is an attempt at defending some fiction. Thus, the greedy aggressors are sold as glorious defenders. No matter the lies or name-calling our pseudo-defenders engage in to sell unjust aggression as a moral defence, arguably, those who receive the first blow are always deserving of inflicting the last.

The Futility of War

As our largest and most celebrated empires become so by having many people within their groups that are willing to harm and murder many that have done them no wrong, our empires are the glorification of wrongdoing, and none have committed more wrongs than our MOEM empires. Countries are a relatively new spin on the now unfashionable empire system. However, our empires of slaves are just as present today as they have always been.

Now they hide behind corporations, puppet political systems and large influential international organisations. The world maps that our glorified wrongdoers use to define their fictions are just another lie used to hide their mass wrongdoing that is always on display. If we use the traditional empire map system that shows the territories under the control of a dominant hierarchy, our world maps would look a lot different, and more accurate in terms of who owns and runs what. Although an honest map would pretty much just consist of our MOEM and a few demonised hierarchies unwilling to bow to their greed.

As there are really no countries, just corporations that use the same name of an area of land, these corporations own all within that territory, and not just the raw materials, but the human population too. In this system, nothing belongs to the populations that live there, not even themselves. Modern hierarchies sell their populations as collateral to our MOEM, in return for huge loans to pay for their lavish lifestyles and fantasies, at colossal interest to their “taxpayers”, of course. This inevitably results in the MOEM owning all within that state.

By convincing their slaves to identify with the corporations that own them, our modern-day slavemasters have convinced their livestock to be loyal to their master’s greed. With so many valuing the cult of countries by bowing to the conditioning of pride and passion for their fictions of flags and borders, slaves are not just willing, but even proud to serve the interests of the glorified wrongdoers who pretend to be the thing they attach their identity to. Stealing, raping, maiming, and murdering are all things no one wants done to themselves, but when merely asked to do these things for the interests of a few individuals that hide behind such fictions, these acts suddenly become great and glorious deeds within the minds of the more suggestible.

The most dominant social hierarchies (or any for that matter) do not become so by being moral and just. They become dominant due to their desire to commit every wrong imaginable on a mass scale, upon those who are weaker or less malicious. As false flag events are necessary for aggressors to sell themselves as some kind of great and glorious defenders of something moral and just, while masking the fact that they are the orchestrators of mass wrongdoing, they get many to believe their targets are the bad guys.

By blaming their own actions on those they wish to steal from and harm, hierarchies can glorify their heists and orgies of wrongdoing as some kind of moral crusade, while always playing the victim and hero. These orchestrated acts that are used to manufacture an outpouring of misplaced moral vengeance against targeted groups have nothing to do with justice or morality, regardless of what their lying industries may bombard their populations with. As false flags work so well at selling and justifying pre-planned genocides, we will be experiencing them for as long as we have social hierarchies.

Truth may be sold as the first casualty of war, but truth is the first casualty of differing worth and has no place within hierarchal cultures. Their treaties and declarations of war or peace are also built on lies. Declarations of war from our hierarchies are rarely unplanned, and they are often years or even decades in the making. As war is always one group of people trying to steal from another group of people, the group that is doing the stealing are what we could define as the bad guys, but social hierarchies have to convince their enforcers that they are the good guys, even when it is abundantly obvious that they are the bad guys. This is why hate, lies and ignorances are vital to any social hierarchy in order to recruit the more suggestible among us, to enforce their wrongs.

Social hierarchies’ enforcers are (more often than not) built around an abusive culture that is designed to weed out anyone who has a strong sense of right and wrong, while championing those willing to obey and to wrong others with little to no reasoning, other than the good guy/bad guy nonsense as their justification. As our hierarchies abuse their enforcers in order to get them to value the hate and lies that are necessary to harm, void of a just cause, those unwilling to harm for the greed of a few have to be belittled in order to elevate the more compliant. With 80% of us falling into the suggestible category when it comes to our group mentality, our hierarchies always have more than enough willing slaves.

As an enforcer for a social hierarchy, we can be used as cannon fodder between one population of slaves and another while competing hierarchies thrash out a deal. Thus, war and its victims are negotiation tools that are used to influence the terms of our hierarchies contracts, or treaties, while their slave populations are used as merely disposable tools of leverage to gain a better deal.

Competing hierarchies sit back while deploying those under their control to murder each other just to gain the ascendancy in their negotiations. Once one side has won or both have come to an agreement and they decide it is time to complete their contract or treaty, hierarchies declare an end to much of their orchestrated killing, maiming, torturing, raping and thieving. So, like some magical group kill switch to wrongdoing, their obedient slaves suddenly put aside all the hate and rhetoric they have been forced to comply with, and it’s back to labouring for their masters rather than killing and dying for them.

While hierarchies are usually free from the harm they incite to quench their greed, their slaves must pay with their lives, families, health, sanity, wealth and property. But alas, with just a few lies, it is all worthwhile as their slavemasters declare the obedient participants as heroes, give them a few medals and declare the whole endeavour of their orgy of wrongdoing as something honourable and glorious that has to be commemorated for generations to come, as this will encourage others to follow the same demented lunacy.

Creating a population that buys into the glory of their masters wrongdoings is always a goal of social hierarchies, and those who fall for this nonsense are labelled as great patriots who love their hierarchy, fiction or country, as many now call it. Yet when it comes to a competing social hierarchy doing the exact same thing, they are often labelled as extreme nationalists or terrorists in the rebranding process of the same acts that occurs at every level within our cultures of hypocrisy.

To be a patriot or not is a common nonsense used to either belittle or shame anyone who has no interest in feeding the greed of a few, while glorifying those that do, or at least those who are forced to value such lies. Enforcers killing and dying at the behest of their fictions CEO’s maybe something that many find righteous and glorious, but this obvious nonsense will never be valued by all.

Not being a patriot of any corporation is obviously not a bad thing and maybe even a glorious thing if we are susceptible to glorifying, but in order to convince their more suggestible slaves to engage in the act of taking lives and surrender their own, such mistreatments, from belittling to killing of disobedient slaves, can be all the incentive many need to comply with their masters’ will. If we understand that the fictions of our time and place meant nothing to all who came before our existence, and will mean nothing to all after they are gone, maybe we wouldn’t be so gullible to such nonsense.

All enforcers are heroes and villains, depending on which of the receiving ends of their actions we are on. For hierarchies and those of us that gain great wealth from their wrongdoing, they are heroes, and for all those of us that are wronged in the process of their orgy of wrongdoing, they are villains. Despite the lies social hierarchies inflict upon their obedient slaves, their wars are not about nationalism, democracy, freedom, religions, gods, good v evil, to save a population or even the planet, these are just necessary lies that are used to distract their populations from the truth and demonise their targeted group enough to encourage their servile folk to hate and harm them. As obedient slaves must value lies more than the truth, we are always vastly more likely to kill for a lie than we are to kill for the truth, but the truth make idiots of us all.

Doing wrong can affect our own joys. Even the act of righting a wrong can dampen our joys, unless we are of a particularly malicious, vindictive and petty nature that we get some kind of joy from harming others. Speaking of which, those who voluntarily join the ranks of our glorified wrongdoers’ enforcers will always have varying intent in mind.

There are always going to be many different reasons that make us so willing to harm others in exchange for a little wealth and status. For our low-status status seekers, there is the opportunity to have a form of power over others that we may never have without joining our largest group of wrongdoers. So, gaining the ability to intimidate, terrorise and harm others, while being protected as a glorified wrongdoer and free from any accountability, can be very attractive for many people.

Enforcers are the most obedient slaves within any social hierarchy, as there is almost no wrong that most will engage in when told to, regardless of any sense of morality. By being conditioned to obey those who adorn themselves in elevated worth, many aid in their glorified wrongdoer’s malice. With almost all enforcers coming from the slave classes, the lure of wealth and social status (as well as having a degree of power over others that they may not otherwise experience) in exchange for blind obedience and an abandoning of any integrity is a price worth paying for many, but it can be made very difficult for them to do much else.

There is little to no informed consent involved with the recruiting enforcers, as many of those that are manipulated into taking an oath to serve the interest of a few, often have little understanding of whose greed they are feeding. Even if they do realise they have been duped into being a glorified thug, they can be accused of treason or worse if they decide they no longer wish to harm others just to enrich their masters. Those who blindly obey, surrender their ability to fight for a just cause, as all they can ever fight for is their instructor’s desires. Only those who are free to walk away from a fight without consequence, are free to fight for something of worth. Anything else is just survival.

This is why hierarchies often desperately try to convince their slaves that their survival is dependent upon their master’s desires being met, and when they start killing their less obedient slaves who exercise their freedom to walk away, it becomes true to an extent. Forcing people to fight in wars is always necessary for all social hierarchies, as there is always a percentage of their slaves who know how to recognise a lie.

Our empires require wars (against competing hierarchies and their populations) to maintain and grow their control over those they wish to enslave to their will, and every new generation of slaves need to be taught that their freedoms don’t supersede the greed of a few. Every “great” empire is only great in its level of wrongdoing and built on the backs of its slaves, but as status seekers like to take the credit for the work of others, their hierarchies declare themselves as the builders of empires.

All social hierarchies (from their conception) are declarations of war upon all those they wish to dominate. Instead of seeing their fellow human beings as equals, they see enemies everywhere, as anyone capable of saying what they see or recognising a lie can threaten their elevated worth. Declarations of war are not even required to steal from others now, as simply labelling any competing social hierarchy as terrorists (like there is any other form of social hierarchy) is justification enough for a more powerful hierarchy to invade and violate another.

An ignorant and oppressed population is easily herded into any war, at home or abroad, with just a few lies. Those who do not share in the delusions of a social hierarchy’s superior human status will always be the enemy, as they challenge their hierarchy’s wrongdoing by their disinterest in such lies, while those who tolerate or even glorify their wrongdoing add value to a social hierarchy, as they allow themselves and others to be devalued just to satisfy the desires of a few. However, the moment these contented slaves discover the truth or no longer value their role as a subservient human, they are often automatically reduced to enemy status, no matter how well they have served the interests of the few up until that point.

Even members of the few within the social hierarchy can quickly become the enemy if they go against their hierarchy’s will. The concept of traitors is not restricted to a hierarchy or their willing minions that swear eternal allegiance to their greed. Those who have no interest in serving the greed of a few, oppose any hierarchy or get involved in the lunacy of such a concept can all be branded as traitors despite no betrayal or even the lifting of a finger to aid their wrongs. As long as their hierarchy brands them as their property, any action or inaction that displeases the hierarchy can result in the creation of a traitor. Our hierarchies’ laws on treason are particularly hilarious and ridiculous in order to allow them to justify any whim or malice they wish to exercise.

As one of the spoils of war is always free or cheap labour (or slaves as we used to call them) that is wrenched from the conquered populations, hierarchies can greatly increase their wealth from such practices. Destroying faraway communities in order to capture slaves is a standard practice, but in the modern-day equivalent that pretends to value the abolition of slavery, we destroy faraway communities (or spread democracy as our lying industries like to call it) and then encourage and aid the surviving victims to travel to the lands of their invaders. This avoids all the unpleasant business of chaining and transporting the newly conquered slaves back home. By transporting them to the lands of their conquerors, or getting them to struggle through large distances and profiting from their orchestrated plight all the way, our hierarchies gain the influx of slaves (for labour and sex) they require.

By rebranding slaves as refugees to appear as if they give a damn about human life while committing genocides, our glorified wrongdoers use their immigrants to obediently perform the tasks their native discontented slaves are not too keen on performing, at a cheaper rate, of course. Our empires cause these mass migrations not just with the destruction of their victims’ homes, families, towns and cities, but with the loss of their resources.

With the introduction of excessive wrongdoing, many conquered populations have little option but to migrate from famine and poverty to somewhere they can find safety, food and the degree of wealth that is required to survive in cultures controlled by a MOEM, even if that means embracing slave labour for those who orchestrated their plight. Our social hierarchies will always be going around with their swag bag in one hand and weapons in the other, to carry out their glorified practices of robbery and genocide, driving millions of people from their homes to reduce them to an exploitative resource for societies of differing worth.

When trying to encourage or discourage war, the killing of children is often used as a tool to traumatise or lie. Of course, the unnecessary death of a child is always a terrible tragedy, but is it any more tragic than the unnecessary death of an adult who is, after all, someone’s child? Killing the enemy can always be glorified when it is adults being killed, but it is always difficult to glorify the killing of children. Well, for most but the most ignorant and hateful of minds. If it is more of a tragedy to kill children, then at what age do we define the boundary between childhood and adulthood in order to measure the level of tragedy, or in order to glorify the killing of an individual?

Well, it would seem around puberty, as this is when young males become competition for females, making them legitimate targets in the eyes of our more malicious and envious males. Children are always part of warfare, whether we like it or not, as even if only adult males were to be involved in the violence of war, children would always be affected by the loss of their relatives. Killing people who have done no wrong is all in a day’s work for a social hierarchy, and they are never above using or killing children to serve their own interests, no matter how many words they may use to say otherwise.

Wars are predominantly slaves killing slaves while their masters cower behind their wealth and status, but if our warmongering masters and their families were the ones in the front lines of the battlefields they glorify, there would be few wars. However, with an endless supply of ignorant slaves, war is a constant when it is so easy to turn kin against kin with just a few obvious lies.

The wars our social hierarchies engage in for resources with competing hierarchies, may, on occasion, come with a peace treaty. But their populations are never awarded such a courtesy, as the more-thans are always at war with the less-thans they must harm to maintain their elevated worth. As long as slaves are killing slaves, war will always be glorified and used to enrich the few, but when slaves start to kill their hierarchies, suddenly war and violence are transformed into less-than forms of wrongdoing such as savagery, barbarism or the modern-day terrorism.

Whether our social hierarchies populations of slaves gain any real or perceived victory or defeat in war, post-war, they will still be slaves to their old or new hierarchy. So it is always reasonable to ask, what the hell are they fighting for other than the privilege of being enslaved by group X or group Y? Despite the common declarations of victory from our lovers of genocide, there are no winners outside the very few who profit from the orgy of war. Everyone else loses. Every family loses, every population loses, and every army loses, yet the warmongering never ends when social status is valued.

The futility of war for the populations under the heel of our social hierarchies’ war pigs is always exposed in the aftermath of war, as our slave populations killed and die for the honour of bowing to master X or master Y. They are slaves before a war and slaves after a war, regardless of how many of them die or how many they kill. The term “freedom” is often used to glorify ill intent by those who actively and wilfully restrict and deny others from exercising theirs. As the acts of seeking elevation above others within our large groups come with harming others, none of our glorified wrongdoers care a jot for freedom, other than from their own accountability.

As no population wants to go to war (void of status seekers at least) and must be lied to in order to sacrifice their children or volunteer as cannon fodder, hierarchies use their lying industries to maintain a constant flow of lies that mire their populations in a forest of fictions. With their slaves preoccupied with this orchestrated nonsense, they become totally ineffective at addressing their forced servitude to the greed of a few, and easier to control and manipulate as they promote fictions above reality.

We can create all the fictions we wish and give them as much meaning as we want, but all of these things will never go beyond concepts that exist in the minds of the beholder. The truth will always eliminate every ignorance we invent. We can ignore those truths from the day we are born to the day we die, but they are always there. As the dust of truth lingers all around us, no amount of truth cleaners can cope with its never-ending onslaught, but that’s not to say our status seekers, with their truth dusters, do not try.

All social hierarchies destroy communities, as when even one is elevated above others, they cease to be for all. This leaves little to no community within them, outside of the superficial and pretentious ones they are famed for. Social status in itself is anti-social as it is used to divide and harm. Our malicious more-thans do like their blacklists, shunning, and banishing or cancel culture, as many call it today, as exclusion helps to sell the ignorance of differing worth. As division and hate are rebranded as exclusivity, exclusion becomes something to value within our communities that are infected with differing worth, despite it being the opposite definition of community.

Social hierarchies must manufacture hate in order to divide its populations, and even to unite them in targeting others. Once an orchestrated superficial hate is ignited in the minds of their followers, then this alone can be more than enough to convince many to commit wrongs upon their targets. Once the wrongdoing begins and the wronged understandably develop a genuine hate for their wrongdoers, the inevitable retaliation and defending against their wrongdoers creates a more genuine hate in the minds of those who initiated the wrongdoing, over the superficially manufactured hate they started with.

Even when our corporate enforcers have killed and died for a manufactured hate, and are told to stop after their masters have come to an agreement or treaty that they can profit from, the hate does not cease just because a magical peace is declared by those who have earned great wealth from the resulting carnage. Hate has a habit of lingering, and our social hierarchies take full advantage of this, as they aim it at individuals or groups that sail too close to the truth of their actions, allowing them to exploit their enforcers further by manipulating the transference of their hate onto others.

With social hierarchies paying their enforcers to do their dirty work for them, both parties dilute their culpability for the wrongs they commit. Hierarchies can claim a degree of plausible deniability or even innocence as it is not them that commit the wrongful acts, despite being the ones that orchestrated them. While enforcers can claim a degree of diminished responsibility or even innocence, as they are told by others to commit the wrongful acts, despite being the ones who commit them. Both hierarchies and enforcers are guilty of the wrongs they inflict upon others, but this does not stop them shirking from the responsibility of their own actions. A trait that is well-worn among status seekers.

It takes years of conditioning for many enforcers to reach the stage where they can transform any act of wrong into a justifiable act when commissioned by those with more wealth and status than themselves. There is always going to be a percentage of any large population that will gladly engage in tyranny, especially if protected by the shield of social status and wealth, as well as armed with ignorance and malice. Our hierarchy’s minions can even mire themselves in superiority when glorified for their wrongs, while those outside the special bubble of glorified wrongdoers are vilified for the very same acts.

The practice of accusing their competition of what they themselves do is a common one among hierarchies, especially dominant ones. Terms such as extremists, terrorists, fundamentalists, criminals, organised criminals, murderers, thieves, rapists, abusers and fraudsters can all be used to define every social hierarchy, but by declaring the monopoly of such words to be hurled at their rivals, they can turn these terms onto those they wish to wrong.

Even though there are no greater terrorist groups than a social hierarchy or their governments, such terms are now so overused to describe anyone who resists their mass wrongdoing, that a disabled old pensioner who texts a truth on social media can now be labelled a terrorist. Not supporting genocide is an act of terrorism this is the level of lunacy we can sink to with differing worth. As social hierarchies pretend not to be terrorist organisations, despite relying on terrorising those they wish to be more than, we will always endure them projecting themselves onto others.

For these pseudo-anti-terror terrorists, telling the truth is rarely in their interests, so projecting what they are onto their victims helps to sell their wrongs as somehow justifiable to a percentage of the ignorant populations they produce. By encouraging their slaves to ignore the fact that there is no greater terrorist threat to any population than the social hierarchy that controls them, many slaves come to value their masters hypocrisy. Many of today’s mass terrorists groups that call themselves governments, constantly attempt to instil fear within their populations, so it is always laughable when they insist that their victims are the ones that are trying to inflict fear.

The threat of a genuine attack from any of the many groups of people our glorified wrongdoers harm is very insignificant in comparison to the real daily threat all populations face from their hierarchy. With the added common practice of false flag events, designed to gain support for pre-planned genocides, we could argue that the practice of our mass murderers in superficially comforting the families of those they have murdered, in order to use the anger of their loss as a weapon to point the finger of hate at their targets, is an especially cruel one. But cruelty is just a standard practice for any hierarchy.

By manufacturing crisis after crisis for the slave classes to immerse themselves in, our social hierarchies get to steer the attention of their slaves away from themselves and the wrongs they commit. The common narrative that is proven to work well in quelling discontent among any population is a fabricated enemy that is sold as some great threat to the slave classes.

This makes slaves scared of any alternative to the misery of their servitude to a few. This lie is often used to convince a population of slaves that they are being treated so poorly by their hierarchy because of some perceived enemy, and not because that’s just what their hierarchy does. Those susceptible enough to value these lies can be encouraged to ignore the obvious fact that their own hierarchy restricts their basic freedoms, and instead obediently blame their hardships on their hierarchy’s targets.

When it comes to crisis management, our social hierarchies are beyond pathetic, mostly because they are generally the ones causing the crisis in the first place, in order to be seen as the saviours of their own disasters. However, in a genuine crisis, the idea that their slaves must remain unaware of the true extent of any crisis is very common within our dens of status seekers, as these more ignorant minds often believe that their less-thans lack the superior intellect that they possess in order to cope with a truth.

The more aware among us know full well that the reason hierarchies must lie to their slaves about the true extent of any crisis is because their authority and power is very fragile. As their power is all based on lies, there is nothing like an unscripted real crisis to run the risk of their slaves abandoning those lies and their willingness to serve the interests of the few. All social hierarchies constantly sell the lie that they have their population’s best interests at heart, and this lie is always crucial in times of crisis to maintain the level of control needed to have their positions of masters within their master/slave cultures, respected by the less aware.

Those who have a desire to elevate themselves at the cost of others are arguably barely worthy of the basic respect most afford their fellow humans and even other life forms, yet many of us are willing to respect and even glorify the prolific wrongdoers that live among us. Whenever a group of people that don’t value their oppression within a social hierarchy start to organise themselves into a unified group, they are immediately targeted by their hierarchy in order to avoid a lessening of their control over their population. The usual tactics of infiltrating, dividing and dissolving such groups by bribing, threatening, assaulting, imprisoning and killing those within them are used in order to maintain the status quo of all social hierarchies.

Protest will always be a part of these master/slave cultures, as slaves obviously lack any real social engagement beyond their oppressors’ facades, so the only types of protests that are taken seriously are those that affect the two things all glorified wrongdoers care about, wealth and status. By disrupting their flow of wealth, protesters simultaneously challenge their master’s status and the control they define themselves by. Without their wealth, they have little status, as thanks to our MOEM, this is the most common measuring stick for all status seekers, so it is no wonder hierarchies surround any large protest that threatens their wealth with enforcers who are prepared to harm and kill to facilitate their greed.

As social hierarchies are exclusive by nature, they will always incite conflict among their populations using differing worth to encourage them to hate each other. As the many wrongs needed to achieve inequality gain support by rewarding those who obey their glorified wrongdoers, our hierarchies surround themselves with those who profit from their wrongdoing in some way. Hierarchies use layers of people to create a protective barrier between themselves and those they wrong, and most of these people will have to sell their integrity to varying degrees in order to form a protective culture around their most gross wrongdoers.

The more we glorify them, the more we are included within the social groups they rule over. Any group that excludes others for little to no reason is arguably not worthy of belonging to, but too many of us find the idea of being more than others too difficult to resist. Social hierarchies encourage our desire to be special in order to create status seekers that they can manipulate with ease, as those that seek status are much more likely to respect it in others. When we fail to see people for what they are, it can often be because we don’t want ourselves or others to see what we are.

As long as we allow our desire to be special to be used as an excuse to harm and divide us, we are sadly stuck with social hierarchies as our main type of social structures. Despite the “concerns” from many about the injustice that streams from the gross inequality that these systems champion, how many of us really care that much for others?

As cold and inhumane as these cultures are, much of the apathy for gross injustice within these social systems stems from the systematic enslavement of their populations. The scale of wrongdoing and the low value empathy has within such cultures plays a role in our tolerance for gross wrongdoing. Many of us are too preoccupied with ourselves and our own struggles for survival (of which much is orchestrated by our hierarchy) to even think about the plights of those we share our time with.

As we navigate through the ignorances and insincere values of these cultures, many of us may believe we are lovers of equality, but if we were to take any individual from the lowest status and give them the highest status, what percentage of people would become content to enjoy the trappings of gross inequality? We could argue over that percentage, but it is this very real scenario that plays out within social hierarchies to varying degrees, as a way of buying influential individuals or groups to side with the cruelty of such cultures.

Buy the enemy, blackmail the enemy or kill the enemy, either works at removing them. We are more than capable of creating inclusive social groups that offer equality of opportunity to all, but if we wish to be seen as special or more-than, then we have to ask the question: is that what we really want, or are too many of us content enough to see most of our cousins suffer needlessly, just for an overwhelmingly limited opportunity to say we are special?

All social hierarchies have their social status spectrums that encourage their sycophants and status seekers to slither across, by harming or at least condoning harm upon others. These spectrums of differing worth can hold very real significance within the minds on many that have allowed themselves to descend into these pits of ignorance.

To attach our identity to anything as superficial as a social hierarchy will cloud our understanding of much, as if we fail to separate ourselves from the superficial, we are less likely to separate lies from truths. One lie can have a domino effect of knocking down a series of truths that become lost to the minds that value a series of lies needed to maintain the original lie. For every lie we value, we run the risk of allowing it to blind us to many truths.

When the voices of any social group are limited to the ignorant cheerleaders of a glorified few, we can’t expect any kind of truth to be fully valued, as our sycophants are more concerned with who to nod and clap for than anything else. Whether we seek status or not, we are all going to be exposed to the pathetic political posturing of pompous people who are desperate to have others see them as more than they are. Many of us who fall for our desire to be special can delude ourselves into believing our lives have a special purpose, and if we fail to fulfil that delusion, we can allow others to fulfil it for us. This leaves many status seekers open to manipulation in exchange for a sense of purpose that social hierarchies dangle as carrots, even if that purpose is harming others.

Avoiding knowing what we are, in favour of defining ourselves by the group, is the curse of the social creature. Few of us seek power to serve others. Most of us do it to serve ourselves, no matter how much we may attempt to convince ourselves or others of our lack of self-interest and greed.

Some of us just need a bit more time than others to remove the blinkers the ego can force us to wear, while others never even know they are there. In our cultures of greed, where even the truth is enslave by our glorified liars, not valuing the lies can draw the attention of the more malicious among us.

Hierarchies have their differing groups of differing worth that they pigeonhole everyone in, depending on their worth to the hierarchy. If we have no interest in any side of the divides that all social hierarchies rely on, we immediately become a target for our glorified wrongdoers and their minions, as, at best, we are reducing their number of productive slaves willing to serve their interests, and at worse we may influence other slaves to serve their communities and themselves, instead of the greed of a few.

All of our groups rely on a degree of cooperation, whether it’s voluntary or forced, but our hierarchies sell their superficial notions of competition within their monopolies in order to justify forced cooperation and the idea of differing worth, to encourage their slaves to strive towards being more productive in feeding the greed of a few, rather than helping each other.

Competition and competitiveness has its value, but when it is used to glorify inequality and injustice, it is merely another tool used to create support for gross wrongdoing. If we become so ignorant or so oppressed that we don’t even question our ignorance of differing worth, then we should not be too surprised when those we allow to act like gods condemn others to their anti-human treatments that they inflict upon the populations they hold control over.

Manufactured Deprivation

Poverty, like violence, is a great controller of slaves. Our hierarchies impoverish their slaves in order to force compliance, and none do it better than our medium of exchange monopolists. Most of us on this planet are crippled by the systems of poverty inflicted upon us by our hierarchies, and having to listen to the nonsense of those who are largely free from this affliction, telling those who are not, that they are somehow less-than, is beyond pathetic.

It is akin to someone putting someone’s legs in chains, strapping them to a large weight, then having a foot race, only to have the unchained sprint past them to declare themselves as a faster runner in a bid to convince themselves and others into valuing the lie. Yet armies of status seekers are used to prop up the array of lies that aid in the proliferation of orchestrated poverty. Poverty has to be manufactured and maintained for social hierarchies to flourish.

Criminalising human nature in a large percentage of any group (the poor or less-thans) has to be the most inefficient way to organise our social groups, but as it limits freedoms and choices for most, it works well for groups that value inequality and injustice. If we look at our social groups from a problem-solving perspective, then removing poverty and the criminalising of all who do no wrong are the easiest ways to creating a more efficient and harmonious social group. There are few problems that our groups cannot solve, but within the realms of social hierarchies, these problems are highly valued for championing exploitation and differing worth.

As our social hierarchal loops of human misery have their cycles, we could argue the ignorance of differing worth is within our nature as a social species, thus the cycles of the oppressed becoming the oppressors or the weak becoming the strong, is a common pattern among our groups. As many groups flee persecution just to establish their own system of persecution, it appears that we are never really against persecuting for the sake of it.

We just prefer to be the ones doing the persecuting, rather than being the ones experiencing it. Those who oppose their hierarchy’s tyranny and go on to replace them, often turn out to become the very same thing they opposed due to their lack of understanding of themselves and/or human nature itself. Putting control of any group’s enforcers into the hands of a few or even a single individual will always facilitate tyranny.

Those that chase control of any force are always going to use that force to keep control. The powerful will always exploit the powerless when they adopt the delusion of elevated worth and indulge in its rewards. Social status holds differing meaning and value among any population divided by differing worth, from those that know it is used to justify every wrong, to those who believe it is a recognition of their deluded sense of superiority, and everything in between. As hierarchal societies are incapable of going beyond the base desire stage of social development, we could argue that this social immaturity is a necessary stage in social development, if it were not for our more egalitarian hunter-gatherers, but development is not always linear.

The real wealth of any social system is the human beings within them, not their masters, materials or resources. Even social hierarchies know people are our greatest resource, but they only know how to exploit them to serve their own limited base desires. They are terrible at tapping into the level of skills, knowledge and understanding people have, never mind our scale of potential.

With our hierarchies preoccupied with serving their own interests, not only does their social dynamics stifle development, but the technology and infrastructure within the territories they control suffer from inefficiency and poor development. On a regional and world-wide scale, this lack of development due to little vision and cooperation between hierarchies, as well as their need for destruction, is magnified more so by the little to no global infrastructure. So prioritising the greed of a few will always stifle our progression.

Within these cultures of deceit, even many of the most honest individuals learn that the truth is wasted on their social hierarchy and their army of minions, so they give them the lies that they want to hear. Thus, it is little wonder that progress is always tedious when honesty is a crime. Many mired in the ignorance of attaching human worth to their level of wealth, may be forgiven for thinking money makes things happen, not people, but no amount of money can farm land, build houses, make roads, develop technologies or even fight wars for that matter. It all comes down to the actions of people.

We can make more money in a few seconds than every human being that has ever existed, and we can make every individual on the planet a billionaire if we wished to. That’s how little meaning money holds outwith those enslaved by it. We may be able to control people’s actions with wealth, status, violence and humiliation rituals, but we could as easily inspire people’s actions with cooperation, equality and justice instead, leading to inclusive groups over exclusive ones.

We are more than capable of producing large groups that serve all instead of a few, but only if we understand the worth of all. So, how much time do we waste harming each other, just to feed the greed of the plague of parasitic status seekers in our groups? How much time do we waste reducing the worth of individuals and groups by our wrongdoers’ mediums of worth? How much time do we waste valuing ignorances and lies? How much time do we waste trying to fit into a social system that most are excluded from? How much time do we waste on social hierarchies? Well, there is a good chance the answer to all these questions is all the time we have, but time will tell.

Chapter 6

Our Tools of Exchange

Shiny rocks, dull rocks, coins, paper, cardboard, wood, teeth, salt, minerals, spices, people, animals, plants, knives, labour, sex, tools, cigarettes and alcohol, as well as digits on a screen, are among some of the stuff we have used as a medium of exchange or to give something in exchange for something else. Today, our hierarchies use currencies as their medium of exchange, with numbers on a screen (or digital currency) being the most dominant one, as there is next to no cost for the controllers, nor any restrictions in its production.

This makes digital worth as easy as pressing a key for our modern-day medium of exchange monopolists (MOEM) to create wealth for themselves, as well as controlling it and all those that use it. A medium of exchange (MOE) or the concepts of money and currencies are just tools we use, potentially very useful tools, but tools nevertheless. Many may believe money is the root of all evil, but the ignorant often blames their tools. Money, like any tool, is not good or bad, and like any tool, it is the intent of the user that can be good or bad, depending on the realm of perspective we choose to define such things by. As all social hierarchies are born and maintained with malice, ill intent is always more common when it comes to their use of tools.

We could say knives, guns and explosives are evil or bad when used to harm, but they are great tools in the hands of those with good intent, to cook, defend or mine. Just as a hammer or chisel can have great use, but with bad intent can kill. If we create an environment based on differing worth and we produce people who see others as less-than themselves, then such ignorances will always be used as an excuse for wrongdoing. So, put any tool in the hands of those wrongdoers within these environments of bad intent, and the results are inevitable. With the ignorance of differing worth essential for our status seekers to have their lies valued, our MOE is used as a medium of our worth within such cultures to promote the idea of differing worth. This helps to gain acceptance and even support for the wrongdoing that social hierarchies engage in.

When all are enslaved by it, our MOE becomes something many are often forced to obsess over, as the absence of it can threaten our status and even our very survival. Obsessing over this tool can produce negative effects on our lives and those we share it with, but this can be said for any tool. Imagine someone who obsesses over a vacuum cleaner, an egg timer, a treadmill or any tool for that matter, they are not likely to be the most stimulating of company to spend our time with. So before we go blaming our tools for our own behaviours, we should take a look at ourselves. Pondering all the possibilities of a tool and how they are most likely to be used within certain environments, and the intent of those within those environments, would limit any notion of tool blaming.

There will never be a social hierarchy with good intent. They are by their nature designed to harm. When it comes to our MOE within such cultures, there is a distinctly manufactured lack of public interest and understanding about how this tool is used, and of the intent of its controllers. This mass ignorance that stems from the social control and conditioning orchestrated by our MOEM and their education systems and propagandists ensures we endure environments that don’t threaten the power of those who monopolise our MOE

Many who are immersed within a culture that suffers from the ignorance of excessive differing worth (as most in our modern cultures do), find it difficult to differentiate human worth and our accumulation of their masters MOE as two completely different things. It is likely that we have been using the ignorance of differing worth (or social status) long before we were even human, but with our cognitive abilities giving us the capacity to understand and respect the worth of all, we have no doubt created many egalitarian groups in the course of our existence and still have a few inclusive groups kicking about, even if small in number.

If we imagine a time when we would help those within our communities without question, mostly because we would be more aware that we are related to half the community in some way or another, but still, we are more likely to aid someone who needs help in a community where all have equal worth, or when we need to rely on each other when our group numbers are smaller. As our communities grow in size and we splinter into differing groups, we may feel less and less related to others. Any increasing disconnection among any group may limit our desire to aid others, as without the knowledge of their intent to return a favour, we increase our risk to being exploited.

As unquestioning aid becomes less common when the ignorance of differing worth takes hold, people begin to want something in return for their efforts or goods, other than the promise to return any favour or goods. When we perceive some as more-than and less-than, goodwill is among the first things we lose. Once goodwill starts to fade, as it tends to do when status seekers go unchecked, the tallying of deeds and goods becomes necessary for many, and will, of course, be encouraged even more when we factor in the emergence of excessive greed. Once our self-serving exploiters who take more than they give are tolerated, the scroungers and parasites of communities (or “the elite” as they like to call themselves today), with their endless conspiring, don’t take long in dividing their communities with differing worth to establish a social hierarchy.

As these takers destroy much of the goodwill and sense of community among even the kindest of people, keeping a record of who owes whom and for what becomes necessary. Mostly for the hierarchy to know what they can steal from their less-thans. Exchanging favour for favour, or goods for goods. or goods for favours and favours for goods, has its worth, but even this can be rather difficult when dealing with larger and larger groups. Once our interactions with each other has replaced unquestioning aid with transactions, negotiations almost becomes one of our defining behaviours. With negotiation, our exploiters can thrive and create their cultures where less-thans are in no position to negotiate anything other than obedience. Within such large groups that are barren of honesty and goodwill, more-thans often see other people as something to be exploited, rather than as a fellow human being to be respected as such.

The environments we live in are used by our MOEM to exploit the groups that use their MOE, and our environments are manipulated to aid in that exploitation. For example, communities that use shells or feathers as a MOE are open to exploitation from those in an area where shells or feathers are abundant. This would no doubt encourage many to control the areas of abundance in order to monopolise the MOE for themselves.

Today is no different as a few control data systems to monopolise digital money, in the same way mining and its metals that money was (and still is to an extent) once backed by, is still controlled by a few. Those that have monopolised our mediums of exchange that are used all around the world can exploit the individuals, groups, nations and continents that use them to serve their own interests. Allowing our MOE to be controlled by a few is always going to end up with gross exploitation.

Many of us as children react the same way when we first wrap our heads around the concept of money or our MOE, and the gross inequalities and injustices this tool is used for. We often theorise the simple solution of just making more of it and giving everyone enough. Even though this is a perfectly reasonable solution within our child’s mind (or any other for that matter), we are dismissed as too ignorant by the adults around us, who have already been conditioned to value the ignorance of differing worth, as well as the interests of the controllers of this tool.

Children who see the simple solution void of the ignorances of the conditioned adults around them, are often branded as naive or stupid to mask their accuser’s ignorances. Many of us go on to become those same adults that dismiss this simple and recurring concept most children rightly deduce when yet to succumb to the dogma of any MOEM. The reason the recurring nightmare of each generation’s willingness to aid in the condition of the next into valuing the malicious use of our MOE is because of the level of control the controllers of this tool have over the social environments we live in.

Our social hierarchal education industries that belong to our MOEM steer us away from the truth about the MOE we use every day to exploit and grade each other with. Yet any reasonable mind would insist that understanding how we use it should be common knowledge among all who use it within any social structure worth valuing. Instead, our glorified wrongdoers use the strategy of flooding their victims with lies and misleading information that is sold as way too complicated for most less-thans to understand, in the hope that few do in order to mask the realities of their frauds and the gross inequality and injustice that is inevitable when the MOE we use is owned by a few.

So we get the world of banking, finance and economics where everything is made to be overly complicated to a ridiculous degree, in a desperate attempt to hide the level of fraud, control and manipulation that is designed to enrich the few and exploit the many. A monopolised medium of exchange will always be used to strip others of their wealth and independence to create slaves dependent on their masters.

Our MOE at its best is a tool we use to organise large groups of people in order to achieve effective and relatively fair exchanges and trading among the group. At its worst, it is used to control people’s lives and cause widespread harm to most, as it does today. With most people on the planet living on next to no money, or living from payday to payday even within the richest hierarchal societies, only those absorbed in their own bubble would argue we use it at its best.

Now we could argue that our practice of using an exclusive MOE for malicious purposes is because “we”, as in all the people of the world, don’t have an inclusive MOE. Instead, we use a MOE that belongs to a small group of people who are obviously going to use their control to exploit those that use it, because that is what most status seekers do to others when they have power over them. Our present and history is laden with the corpses and broken families that are a result of tolerating a MOEM, as will our future.

We could argue that this ugly side of us is due to the gross unjust social environments we all experience, and void of a just social environment, our desire to harm others is merely an adaptation to these environments. So let’s give ourselves the benefit of the doubt, well, to a degree. At least until a large social group takes control and ownership of their own MOE as an inclusive tool for all, to advance their culture beyond serving the interests of a few, and use it to develop a cohesive, just, and respect based culture. If not, the mass exploitation of human beings that comes with allowing a few to control our MOE will continue.

Banking on Naivety

It may be difficult for many who have never known anything other than the lies surrounding the exclusively controlled MOE they have always used, to truly embrace the idea of an inclusively controlled MOE existing under the control and benefit of all, instead of a few, but we are more than capable of using such a tool to organising ourselves in a vastly more just and efficient way than we do today.

With this in mind, we shall touch on why a MOE is very useful, as well as the “official” story of how the world came to be confined to the use of a MOE that is exclusively controlled by a few, in order for that few to elevate and lower the worth of every human being that is forced to rely on it. We won’t go as far back to our first MOEM (because who can?) as we really only know about our most glorified of wrongdoers practices over the last 3 to 4 thousand years or so. So let’s skip ahead to our relatively recent modern era, where greed is good, and the monopolisation of everything is the norm. Now, in order to cut a very long story short, we will also skip some stages, so don’t be looking for a complete deep dive, expect more of a skim.

Anyway, as we can imagine, once differing worth is established, and we start to form larger communities that celebrate gross inequality, like our social hierarchies, many of us are going to be encouraged to specialize in a certain field. Specialization helps status seekers avoid contributing to any group and concentrate on stealing from the group. It also helps to isolates any slaves understanding of the whole. So let’s take one of our slave class jobs, for example, a farmer, who grows food, can trade his food for chairs with a carpenter who makes chairs (eh! where are we going with this). All very lovely until the farmer has a house full of chairs and no longer wants any more, but the carpenter still wants food.

Now the carpenter needs to trade his chairs for, let’s say knives from the blacksmiths and then trade those knives for food with the farmer. Once the farmer has enough knives, the carpenter needs another third party to trade with to get his food from the farmer, or find another farmer who needs chairs, diversify into making tables, change his trade or eat less. Well, there are many options really for the carpenter, but we are getting off track here. Anyway, as we touched on earlier, trade can become a complicated business when we constantly need to trade our products more than once to get the product we wish to attain.

Having to involve a third party into every trade at least doubles the amount of time we need to spend on trading. A MOE is just that third party we use in order to simplify how we trade with one another, by using a product that we trust has an agreed value that others will honour. This is the beauty of a MOE and can be very useful when a group is organised to aid one another instead of harming each other. However, it is never wise to put trust in any monopolised MOE.

This product we call money has to be of some value, as who is going to give their valuable products, like say a cow or a horse, in exchange for a bit of grass or a leaf from a tree. Therefore, it has to be something most people will value. So by making it something rare or hard to attain, such as gold or silver, we can validate the worth of the MOE. This also means that controlling the mining industry is very important for our money monopolist. Once we give gold and silver some kind of value, this value can be used as a measure to create a standard level of exchange. But these products all come with their own set of problems.

Metal coins are heavy, making moving a large amount of them from one place to another, difficult and susceptible to robbery, as it is hard to run away with heavy goods. Gold can also be used to coat other metals to masquerade as solid gold coins or bars, but like any MOE we use to maintain inequality, there will always be justified incentives to create counterfeits.

Once we trade over large distances and across the globe, these problems become extreme, as when we have an abundance of slaves and develop huge economies, the scarcity of gold, for example, starts to become a problem in limiting the amount of wealth we can have or trade with when it is tied to the amount of gold we have taken from the ground. All of this shows the need for a much lighter, more numerous and more convenient MOE, like the ones we use today that are based on the belief that its owners or makers are trustworthy, rather than based on the scarcity of gold or other commodities. However, a trustworthy social hierarchy! Will we ever learn?

Paper money has its origins in China, as the Chinese developed paper over a thousand years before Europeans did, so it comes as no great surprise that they would use this product as a MOE long before anyone else in our era. However, paper money had its share of failures over the centuries, as we would expect with anything trust-based within cultures of deceit. Now this is the part that our MOEM sell as the origins of modern banking.

In Europe (England), apparently all the more-thans of society grew a distrust for the king (trusting a status seeker! How could they?), because he would use the wealth of the hierarchy to fund his wars and lavish lifestyle. Just like every other king before him, but let us ignore reality and stick with our MOEM story. This distrust resulted in the more-thans giving their wealth to our MOEM in the form of their goldsmiths for safe-keeping, who were apparently perceived as far more trustworthy (OK!). So we end up using paper notes as recipes for the gold and goods we store with our goldsmiths, and these notes become a lot more convenient than carrying gold around with us.

As these notes become more popular, we start to get paper money that has gold to back its value, or the gold standard, as we call it. Now, of course, there is no real surprise when our goldsmiths (or banks) exploited this system to enrich themselves by dishing out more notes than they had gold stored in their vaults (a practice not only still in use today, but the standard practice).

When everyone with gold in their vaults catches wind of this practice and rush to collect their gold that has already been stolen from them, then the system crashes, (as long as we define a system that is designed to defraud people as a system crash, that is, where the customer always loses, and the fraudsters always win). These “crashes” obviously occur with the frequency we would expect from groups that celebrate thievery, and we now use the term “bank run” when bankers run away with other people’s wealth.

These mass robberies and frauds that are hysterically sold as a financial crisis, are so common within such cultures that they have become normalized and even glorified into the structures of our glorified wrongdoers’ banking, financial and economic systems. Once banks become a common arbitrator in the rush for elevated worth, many want in on playing the game of gods, so we get many different banks desperately seeking customers to defraud.

One of the many problems with different banks issuing different notes is that it hinders the use of a MOE, so we end up with our central banks standardizing the notes we use within a particular territory. This is all very lovely until we wish to travel across territories that have different notes, and this issue is ongoing to this day. An issue a small child could solve, but we must bear in mind that few hierarchies can match the intellectual problem-solving abilities of a child, when mired in the ignorance of differing worth and excessive greed.

This “official” birth of modern banking reeks of the usual stench of nonsense our MOEM are forever exposing their victims to. If we analyse this time period with any degree of curiosity, with our usual MOEM tactics of buying, threatening or destroying the hierarchy in order to control it as a political front, we see the same pattern. Once any trust (in its most loose sense) in the hierarchy (or king) has been widely questioned or destroyed, as our MOEM did by selling themselves as more trustworthy, our MOEM and their puppets are seen as a better alternative for many. Then, as the population has a degree of division, our MOEM can buy, use and enflame the slave classes’ hatred for their masters to have kin kill kin, as they did with their civil war that followed.

After yet another banker’s war, the balance of power in England went from their previous hierarchy (monarchy) to the victors of the war, our MOEM. As all good MOEM hide in the shadows to remove the possibility of being replaced or even removed, their puppet government became the official power, as it remains to this day. Once all this was achieved, England had its first central bank that controlled the wealth and lives of all who used it. A pattern that would be repeated all around the world thereafter.

We currently have over 200 central banks that make the money of the countries or regions of our planet. Then we have the major central banks that basically own or control their smaller counterparts. These major central banks are owned by a few families and groups that lord over this glorified human exploitation industry.

Wherever our bankers’ most dominant social hierarchy may be, we normally find our money monopolists exploiting that population as cannon fodder and executioners to orchestrate the wars they need in order to force others to their will. War is always necessary in creating populations that will tolerate a MOEM and the gross greed and inequality that comes with them. Hence, why in today’s world, our MOEM enriches themselves by insisting that the rest of the world use their most obedient groups MOE, or face the violent consequences of daring to use their own.

Now, pretty bits of plant pulp may have no real value to anyone, but we could say the same for gold or silver, as their value is only based upon all who collectively agree to attach value to these shiny things. So if we believe something has value, then it has value. As every hierarchy knows, believers are deceivers’ best friends. Unless we are trading products for products, our MOE is, in itself, always a belief system, regardless of what it is based upon. So, going from a belief in the value of gold to a belief in the trust (albeit a forced trust) in our social hierarchies, despite the obvious consequences of trusting prolific liars, is just as fickle as basing it on anything else (although we could always trust nature’s language of mathematics).

As we touched on earlier regarding territorial social hierarchies exploiting their population’s belief in their authority, and borderless religious social hierarchies exploiting people’s belief in immortality, we could argue that the most powerful hierarchy is the one that controls our belief in our MOE, as the other two are, after all, chasing their products of human worth and control.

Our MOE hierarchy can buy every other social hierarchy that uses their exclusive MOE. We may soon have one group that controls all the money used in the world, and we could say this is the ultimate social hierarchy that will rule the world. By tolerating a MOEM, we allow ourselves to be controlled by those unworthy of determining our worth.

The Sockmaker

Whether we use paper, metals or digits on a screen, matters little to any MOEM, as if we wished to we could use anything. We could even use socks as a MOE. Whatever product we use, by granting exclusivity of that product to a few who make it, we hand those makers total control of our MOE and, therefore, human worth. Making socks as our MOE will sound ridiculous to many, but no more ridiculous than tree pulp or shiny rocks. So just for the hell of it, for the rest of this book, we shall refer to our ultimate social hierarchy that controls the MOE we all use as our sockmaker. Even if it is just for the fact that it has 13 fewer letters than the ultimate social hierarchy, and we know how they feel about 13.

On a little side note, it is interesting that the word sockmaker is not recognised as a “real” or “official” word by the language police, yet the word shoemaker is. This is no doubt due to the social status of those partaking in each craft. Shoemaking (a “real” word) was traditionally a male activity, while sockmaking (any language police may wish to imagine a space) was traditionally a female activity. Thus , rendering the female craft to be subjected to the lower end of the differing worth that exists between the sexes within our cultures of ignorance and inequality. Our status seekers may manipulate language to serve their own interests, but in solidarity to the worth of female industry, we shall use the word sockmaker unapologetically, regardless of the ignorances and biases of those that wish to police language in favour of their status seekers, desires.

Now, as a sockmaker, once our MOE has become common in its use, or after we have forced it upon others, we can buy almost any individual, group, government or army we wish. We can use this level of control to manipulate all into becoming reliant on our product and then exploit all that rely on it to survive. We can incite wars and back both sides, knowing we will always be the winners no matter what.

This ensures the creation of slave nations that will always do our bidding when chained by our system of loans to create a never-ending debt. We can control economies and increase or decrees the wealth or poverty of populations to suit our interests. There are so many advantages to being the sockmaker that maintaining those advantages can, for some, be worth destroying worlds for, and destroy they do, as many groups that have gone against the interests of our sockmaker know too well.

The populations already under their heel are conditioned to be all too willing to massacre any group their masters point to, always in the name of any glorified lie. With the creation of a sockmaker, our mass MOE becomes a mass medium of control and makes the timeless practice of social hierarchies stealing from others easier than it has ever been. No need to hire an army of wrongdoers to forcibly take from others when lives can be ruined at the touch of a button.

Anyone showing a hint of disobedience to this master class can easily have their property, livelihood, family and lives taken from them without much fuss from the slave classes that obey in order to avoid the same fate. Calling our mass wrongdoers “masters”, and their victims “slaves”, may have fallen out of fashion in favour of the modern-day rebranding of the financially independent lording over the financially dependent, but the master/slave relationship changes little, no matter the language used, or the time and place we use it.

As wealth and status are just tools social hierarchies use to convince others to do what they want them to do, these social systems allow the interests of a few to hamstring the potential of all. Within today’s world, where everyone is a debt slave to their sockmaker, was it a coincidence that the Slavery Abolition Act 1833, the Bank Charter Act 1844, the compulsory Education Act 1870 and the introduction of the compulsory Births and Deaths Registration Act 1874, along with the mass practice of birthdays themselves, all took place around the same time?

Well, no. This rebranding of slavery from traditional slave to a legal fiction debt slave allows the legal fiction slave to earn a degree of wealth and therefore pay into their social hierarchy’s tax frauds, thus deceiving them into valuing and participating in their sockmaker’s system of serving the greed of a few. This new stable income stream increases collateral and allows social hierarchies to borrow more from the sockmaker, giving them greater purchasing power for more affluent lifestyles, infrastructure,…etc., while increasing the power, wealth and control of our sockmaker. Our sockmaker, like any drug baron, needs to “lend” their product in order to get any group addicted to using it.

Social hierarchies or nations gain their wealth in many ways. They have their natural resources that are attached to the territories they rule over, hence why many are always so keen to take territory and resources from others, but our territorial social hierarchies love their taxes, as what thief wouldn’t want their victims to hand over their wealth willingly? So they encourage their populations to trade and be taxed as much as possible, to the point where it becomes totally wasteful, as is now very much the norm. For example, we are at a point where our technologies are designed to fail just to feed this greed. We can make products that last a lifetime, but by assuring they fail after a limited time, we can multiply the amount of profits corporations make and therefore increase tax revenue.

If most people need to buy a product ten times in an average lifetime instead of once, then a hierarchy and their corporation that monopolise their industries, just multiplied an income stream by ten times. The waste in materials and time alone are testament to the lunacy of gross greed, but with the added factor of filling our planet with an excessive amount of unnecessary and harmful materials, it takes this practice to stunning heights of stupidity. But as long as money (and the elevated worth it brings) is valued above all else, we are stuck with such things. Social hierarchies want their cut from every trade that happens within their territories, so it serves their interests to drag anything and everything into their realm of taxation, regardless of any of the costs they themselves do not feel, understand or care for.

Social hierarchies compete and cooperate with one another depending on how they can benefit from their relationships, and like any self-serving individual, if there is an advantage to be exploited, then the relationship can change faster than we can say “vassal state”. Trade can tell us much about the relationships of social hierarchies, and in our modern world, the term “free trade” says so much. In a time where trade is anything but free and heavily restricted, it is always amusing when this term is rolled out to mask the restrictions imposed on most, and let’s not even get into sanctions. Oh, hell, why not!

Well, as we would expect from any sockmaker, the desire to have all bend to their will is strong, so attempting to destroy the economies of any competing social hierarchies that will not lay down to their demands is all part of a day’s work for our most glorified of wrongdoers. With currently (2022) just under 40 countries (containing a third of the world’s population) under sanctions imposed upon them by those unhappy with any trade happening without their commission, it shows their level of contempt towards any group that wants to chart its own path. Free trade, anyone? If anything, these sanctions should unite these 40-odd countries to trade with one another more, using their own MOE, not to mention the fact that a third of all the humans on the planet could raise rather a large army to fend off the sockmakers’ mercenaries trying to crush them under their heel.

As our sockmakers can lend infinite digits on a screen, it does not take long before our sockmakers have all the social hierarchies they lend to, indebted to them. Social hierarchies can use their rebranded slaves as a stock value to attain credit from their sockmaker overlords. As these social structure are greed based, they will almost always spend more than they have, and when we combine this with our sockmaker’s rates of interest on their “loans”, it is inevitable that these social hierarchies are going to rack up huge debts.

Our world is in debt (well, our social hierarchies are), but our social hierarchies do not owe Mars or Pluto. They are, of course, indebted to our sockmakers, as well as each other to a degree. Yet it is always their slaves or populations that are expected to pay their masters debts. With the world in debt for hundreds of trillions and increasing every second, this tool of spiralling never-ending debt can be used as an excuse for our most glorified of wrongdoers to justify inflicting poverty upon most of us, thus ensuring their continued iron grip on controlling indebted groups, but only if we ignore the extreme opulence and wrongdoing that such lies facilitate.

Measures of Worth

All of our social hierarchies are measured by their wealth or gross domestic product (GDP), which is supposedly determined by the value of goods and services within its economy over 3 months or a year. And who measures this wealth? Well, unsurprisingly, another corporate entity that is under the control of a social hierarchy, so no chance of any corruption there then. This GDP only measures the wealth of transactions declared by their obedient taxpayers and corporations, so hardly ever going to be an accurate measurement within our cultures of gross fraud and corruption.

Reducing the wealth of any part of the world to the amount of socks they are worth to a hierarchy, does not exactly give a boundless understanding of the worth of that region. However, we must bear in mind that worth under any social hierarchy always comes down to who or what feeds their greed, so we are tied to this measurement as long as we are stuck with those that make them. GDP is more a public measure of a social hierarchy’s swag bag than it is of any territory or population’s worth.

Within our modern-day countries, we commonly have a central bank (and those that don’t should expect to have our sockmaker’s armies committing genocides against their populations under the banner of freedom and democracy, any time soon) that sells digits on a screen (digital socks) and prints money that has its value backed only by the belief of those that use it. These banks then lend their tokens of belief to their targeted social hierarchies, who in turn use these tokens of belief to convince their populations to obey their wishes and serve their interests.

This leads to the social hierarchy to be in debt to the central bank that did nothing more than make the belief tokens they have forced others to value, so in reality, our social hierarchies have taken no real wealth from the central bank and the central bank has endured no real cost (unless we count the comparable minimal costs of creating numbers on a screen and printing a pretty bit of paper). So with little but screen digits and bits of paper lent and borrowed, where is the great wealth of debt? Well, the true wealth of these MOE products are in the added value given to them by a believing and obedient population. Just ask any religious hierarchy how profitable belief in any lie can be.

With the added divine power of belief given to these screen digits and bits of paper, it is no surprise that our glorified wrongdoers are going to force these products onto others and lend more and more to quench their greed. This leads us to inflation, something every status seeker’s ego knows much about. By making more and more money, we create an abundance in circulation (even if most of that is within the hands of a few in the form of screen digits) and so devalue the belief in these tokens of exchange to get a little closer to the reality of the nonsense that keeps these kinds of practices going.

Our MOE loses its value when the few can’t easily use it to buy the many. The more money there is in circulation among the slave classes, the less value our more-thans have. By increasing the wealth and therefore status of less-thans, we somewhat reduce the status of those already deemed as more-thans. So, in order to maintain their more-than/less-than dynamic, we get the routine practice of hierarchies purging the wealth from their populations in what they like to call a recession or a financial crisis. If a population is allowed to build up their own wealth, they will be less exploitable, so inflation, as well as a ”financial crisis” and other tax frauds, can all be used to relieve them of it.

Inflation may be sold as a rise in the price of goods, but an increase in the volume of money that decreases its value usually has more to do with it, so in effect the inflation caused by central banks creating money at will is just another more subtle form of taxation on less-thans. Hierarchies like to have a stable and ever-increasing income, so when abundance or scarcity raise its head, inflation is used and in many ways is the effort to maintain or increase their wealth. If, for example, we look back when European corporations started to rape the Americas of their gold and silver, as well as many other riches, this influx of wealth did not create vastly richer communities.

Instead, it had the effect of raising the costs of goods, so these riches would buy less than they would before the influx. So inflation counters the excess of a MOE, and traders raise the cost of their goods to match an increase in purchasing power within their communities, as well as covering their own increased costs. The few will always benefit from great wealth, while their slaves must always be held down to ensure they have others to elevate themselves above, regardless of how much wealth we have.

Inflation in today’s world is largely just another tool of oppression wielded by our MOEM, with the lowering of inflation (a bit of an oxymoron) used to entice the overuse of a MOE, while high inflation discourages its use among the masses. Low inflation is mostly used to increase a population’s personal debt in order to create unbalanced contracts that tie a population’s wealth and assets to our sockmaker. Then, when they decide they have attained enough victims to exploit, the raising of inflation or an orchestrated financial crisis is used to steal all they can from them. Although, as status seekers rarely like to call a spade a spade, we no longer call it stealing. Today, we call it capitalism, as capitalising on social inequality is somehow deemed more palatable.

The boom and bust strategy of our sockmaker’s frauds or capitalism is a wonderful strategy to create debt slaves by offering the carrot while delaying the incoming stick. It is nothing more than the usual conspiring, greedy mindset that all social hierarchies are governed by. But, of course, this does not stop them from selling it as something else. A never-ending conveyor belt of economists, stock traders and financial experts that are always in great shock when a crash hits (mainly because the boom has given some of them a lifestyle they now know is in jeopardy), yet are willing to sell any reason for its cause rather than the truth.

Economist, financial experts and the like, are all paid up members of their obedience cult, and as fanatics of the religion of money (as well as the usual degrees of malice and ignorance our status seekers come to value), they rattle off all the nonsense they are told to parrot, while conveniently ignoring the number one practice of wealth generation that human beings have ever had, wrongdoing. Far easier to steal from others and have slaves do all the work for us, than try to stand on our own efforts. While the world’s dominant hierarchy have their glorified wrongdoers stationed all across the world in all of their vassal states, as well as those forced to bow to their will, those that are paid to pretend their genius financiers are responsible for a dominant hierarchies wealth, voice little of the fact that their hierarchy has thousands of trained wrongdoers ready to murder millions of their fellow human beings, in order to keep the wealth of others feeding the greed of their glorious few.

Our sockmaker’s highly orchestrated banking industry gives out their socks as loans, and in return, they get their socks back with extra socks in the form of interest. This really does not gain them much more than socks that they can already make in abundance, so there is no real gain if all you gain is more of the same thing you can create an unlimited amount of.

However, by organising economic booms to encourage populations to get themselves into debt by giving out loans of a never-ending supply of digital socks to anyone and everyone, then when the time is right, our sockmaker can trigger economic crashes to strip these populations of their real wealth in the form of property, labour, sex..etc. This allows the sockmaker to simultaneously trade their socks for the likes of property, that has more real value than their socks or money that many believe has value, all while impoverishing their victims, who, as debt slaves, are easier to manipulate or force into surrendering their property.

It is interesting that banks are not allowed to own land to safeguard against them buying any territorial social hierarchies source of income. A plan that is rather naive at best, as banks can simply use their ability to press a key on a keyboard for a few seconds to produce enough wealth to buy any corporation or industry that can own land. However, they can own property like buildings/houses/cars and steal them with their mortgage or loan frauds, but with banks allowed to own property and not land, the owner of a house often owns the land the house sits on.

So, going by their own rules, when a bank comes to repossess, steal, foreclose or whatever term is used to call taking ownership of a house from the family or individuals that live in it, while handing it over to a bank that paid nothing but a lie for it, people may be forced out of their home or property, but should not be forced off their land. In fact people should charge the bank rent if they continue to use their land and refuse to remove the house that the bank now claims as their own, off of their land. Of course, few do this as all those involved in these things are paid to serve the banks’ interests as well as their own, and not the people’s interests. Let’s take a moment to examine this property-grabbing fraud in a little more detail.

Our banks create nothing but digits on a screen and transfer these digits to one of their victims (or customers, as is now their preferred term) accounts so that their victims can buy a house that others built. Those who spent their time and effort on building the home and buying all the materials that were required to build it were also given some digits on a screen by our bankers. All those wishing to use the house must beg the banks for some digits on a screen, even though the banks have not lifted a finger in creating the house, yet by owning all the worth within any population, all must bow to their altar of greed if they want the basic of a house, and continually give them offerings to their greed or be punished. Ah, the joy of cults.

When these cultures produce too much money, and it circulates among their populations as they do in the boom period of the boom and bust model, where credit can’t be given away fast enough, as they did during the Covid-19 pandemic, for example, then there is an imbalance between the amount of money and the amount of stuff to buy. So let’s say everyone got loans and suddenly all started buying anything and everything with their new-found wealth, then if most had a similar standard of living, prices go up so that their class system of differing worth can rebalance the order of who gets priority over others.

Master/slave cultures would be difficult to maintain if all had equal access to the same things. So once its bust time, prices rise in order to prevent everyone using their increased wealth to buy their way out of slavery and the control of their masters, everything has to cost a lot more in order to slow their buying power and thus limit their independence. But can’t we just make more stuff, you ask? Well, we could, but remember these are social hierarchies, where gross inequality and greed are glorified and sold as something to be celebrated. So we can’t have too many on the more-than side of the fence, as this would not allow our glorified wrongdoers to be able to feel as special as they wish if everyone had what they have.

The modern-day debt slave is created by attaching every human being to a birth certificate that is used by their social hierarchy to create a bond that is basically an I.O.U in the same way money is, but this bond has the worth of a slave attached to it. So the bond’s value is backed by the slave who identifies with the birth certificate in the form of a lifetime of tax revenue, hence why debt slaves are conditioned to call themselves by the slave name on this certificate with their date of birth as a kind of barcode.

Hierarchies can use this bond to trade with the banks as collateral, and as the practice of modern-day banking (in principle at least) is to multiply the worth of collateral by ten times the amount, this means a bond worth 1 million allows the creation of an extra 9 million. It is a bit like the reverse of the old masters or kings practice of stealing 10% of their valued slave’s wealth, but by multiplying what they take by ten times, this system ensures they gain vastly more worth than the old system generated.

Forever Inflating Greed

Anyway, back to inflation, as we will delve more into the debt slave nonsense in our Right and Wrong chapter. As inflation is in itself just another controlling mechanism we use to exploit others, the recent Covid-19 pandemic is a good example of how we use inflation under our sockmaker’s era. As our glorified wrongdoers shut down “the free world” (too many jokes to choose from here) to exert more control over their slaves by convincing most of them to use their clean germ free digital MOE, over the dirty and dangerous tactile forms, and void of the usual level of passing around of currencies, they had to hand out their digital currencies for obedience, rather than productivity, to all who were commanded to stop living and stay at home. This required the mass production of digital numbers on a screen to fund this new stay-at-home culture that most productive slaves were forced to endure (hard times all round, eh!).

Thankfully, our ancestral slaves never had to endure such mistreatment. Perhaps we should take a moment to appreciate the courageous, strained fingers that spent a few seconds of their lives bravely pressing a key to create the digits on a screen that many came to rely on for their survival. OK, maybe not. This mass increase all around the world in our digital MOE meant that our slave populations had too much wealth kicking around for their masters’ liking.

A world of only rich people can’t buy slaves, so the creation of poor people is a basic must for any social hierarchy. Post domestic incarceration, or after a void in the daily grind of their servitude to the greed of a few, many were walking away from their jobs in order to pursue a more meaningful existence. Perhaps this is just one of the better consequences of forcing their productive slaves to stop producing for their master’s greed, even if it was only a temporary measure to hook their money junkies onto the digital form.

All masters eventually learn that when their slaves get to experience any kind of freedom from their oppression, they tend to want to keep it. So with too many slaves enjoying their time on this planet to pursue their own interests, instead of wasting it bowing to the greed of a few, “The great resignation” came when many were no longer content to feed the greed of others, after tasting a little respite from the practice. Thus, our masters must incentivise their slaves to get back to work in order to continue to feed their greed, so in steps huge inflation in order to force people back into servitude, and with the relative ease of existence during lockdown, transformed back into the hardship of existence under the heel of our glorified wrongdoers toil, we stem the flow of people choosing anything but a life of servitude.

As inflation is used to impoverish those that threaten to interfere with the system of gross inequality that all social hierarchies champion, all is good in the world again. Our sockmaker’s ability to control interest rates and inflation ensures our slave populations remain financially dependent, regardless of how much they work, earn or build, when it can all be taken from them at the whims of their masters. Whether we view the manipulation of our MOE, interest rates and inflation as legalised theft or a wonderful way to keep slaves working for little, it is likely to infect our cultures for some time.

With the recent cluster of orchestrated deceit that was given the title of the Covid-19 pandemic, turning the world into an even larger and more restrictive prison than it already was, it is a sad reflection on how far we have come to accept our slavery. Our liars and wrongdoers’ global exploit was not that difficult to achieve, as it was met with mass obedience rather than mass outrage. Perhaps unsurprisingly, considering the level of indoctrination to blind obedience that most experience.

Within the melee of demonising and criminalising anyone who hinted at the truth in order to force mass obedience, our social hierarchies around the world put their MOE production into overdrive (so pressing a few more 0’s on a screen). As few within many countries were working to earn the money they received, and their idiotic economic theories were not being repeated that much during this period by their elevated intellectual classes, and to few people’s great shock, differing worth was maintained even when almost all were housebound, as more-thans were given much and less-thans were given little for doing the exact same thing, nothing.

The economics of differing worth is as simple as a few having much while most have little, so our glorified wrongdoers must employ an army of liars to pretend that economics and finance is some great mystical thing that only special folk who have been awarded a certificate of elevated intellect are in a position to even begin to understand. Thus promoting the simplicity of glorified stealing to something that is so massively complex that only a few should every even attempt to understand it. Although the orchestrated event of Covid-19 was used to wean populations off of physical money and encourage them onto the digital form. This ,in itself, could be a wonderful tool to exchange with, but this is totally dependent on the intent of the controllers, so no prizes for guessing how that is going to go in the future with our glorified wrongdoers at the helm.

The manipulation of inflation and slave wages to create their booms and busts helps our glorified wrongdoers to maintain the system of greed to ensure slaves are always concerned with survival, and not the social structure that enslaves them. We are already having people stripped of all their wealth and plunged into poverty, with banks allowed to steal our life earnings at will, but at least when we have physical money that can be put out of the reach of our glorified thieves, we have a chance to survive.

Now imagine when all our wealth is digital rather than physical, how easy it will be to control people and their wealth with the mere threat of making them a financial outcast at the touch of a button, for any reason our sockmaker wishes. Although we could save our imagination if we defy the greed of a few or just stick around for a bit. Welcome to the future of poverty control.

Poverty is a very important tool social hierarchies use to create obedient slaves, as without poverty, not many of their enforcers would be so willing to be used as cannon fodder to feed the greed of a few. If all are poor, then none are poor, if all are rich, then none are rich. All wealth is relative, and if we want to feel rich, we need others to be poor. Equality is so beneficial to any group in creating unity and mutual respect that our glorified wrongdoers must always ensure gross inequality in order to avoid such things from threatening their elevated worth.

Poverty is a great tool to mire people into circumstances where they will do almost anything they are told to do, in order to escape their controlled environments to even the slightest degree. So by manufacturing poverty to make people more susceptible to being used and abused, our hierarchies can ramp up their level of exploitation. Without the ignorance of differing worth, there is no need to oppress others in order to pander to the idea that some are more-than others. Poverty in of itself is often only defined in comparison to very specific forms of wealth, and many superficial ones at that.

If a modern-day contented slave observes a hunter-gatherer tribe, they may convince themselves that these people are living in poverty, simply because they don’t have the stuff they have, not to mention any money. If our base of reference for poverty is having less stuff and money than those around us, then we are likely to come to this conclusion. Even if this tribe had an overabundance of food, water, shelters, medicinal plants, free time and resources to live comfortably, many would still see them as poor or less-than, as it may be difficult for people who are so indoctrinated into the divided communities that are social hierarchies, to see the value in being part of a united community that doesn’t define each individual by the measures of worth their hierarchies impose upon them.

The psychological wealth that comes with unity and freedom may not be as easy to measure in others if we are conditioned to value the superficial measures of differing worth and the divisions and oppressions it creates within our social hierarchies. Hierarchal cultures not only create physical poverty but also psychological poverty in the minds of many that suffer under their control. Maybe some or most of us prefer to live as a slave in a wealthy city, than an equal in a perceived poverty-stricken village, but when those who are forced to spend their lives feeding the greed of a few in order to eke out an existence in attaining food, water and shelter, look down upon those who easily attain such things with a fraction of their effort and time, it can be hard not to smile at the absurdity of it all.

Large groups of people working together can, of course, share in the level of wealth they create, but the equal distribution of any collected wealth is always going to be avoided with the use of differing worth. The vast majority of wealth hierarchies create is by the exploitation of less-thans, slaves, the poor or whatever our hierarchies call those they have declared to have little to no worth.

The few acquire great wealth because they benefit from the efforts of the many, not to mention the social systems of control and oppression they inflict upon the populations they treat as their slaves. Imagine we all served our own interests in the way of building our own homes, hunting/farming our own foods and working to acquire our own stuff and wealth, some will acquire slightly more or less than others.

Now imagine one individual enslaves another to serve their own interest, suddenly that individual can double their productivity and wealth, all for the cost of feeding their slave, who will more than earn their food. Now imagine an individual who has hundreds of slaves, no matter how hard any other individual works, they will never come close to producing the same kind of wealth as someone with so many serving their interests can.

Yet we endure these glorified wrongdoers telling their slaves that they are lazy because they don’t use the same exploitative practices that they use. Scaling this up into our large social hierarchal groups, we can see that the wealth of the few is the product of slaves, or as our modern hierarchies call them today, employees. Masters can’t exist without slaves, employers can’t exist without employees and social hierarchies can’t exist without the ignorance of differing worth.

A common practice or con that is a regular feature within the world of our sockmaker’s slave nations is when a more powerful social hierarchy that has enslaved or at least manipulated a weaker one into surrendering their resources and wealth to them, declares they are sending aid to help them. This pretence takes many forms but commonly the form of giving a MOE to their victims or “less fortunate partners” is used to help them appear humane in some way, but in reality this so-called aid is nothing more than a PR stunt as the money is more often than not sent back into the corporations that they own, in order to create a debt that the slave nation will struggle to pay at the cost of their development.

When it comes to money and social hierarchies, there is no such thing as aid or charity, as they are merely dressed up one-sided contracts that feed the greed of those more dominant or in control of the MOE. The charities of status seekers are mostly used to buy public tolerance or even affection for the gross wrongdoings they celebrate. Many buyers of good faith or philanthropists as many call themselves, can enrich themselves greatly in the process of trying to appear compassionate to the struggles of others, while simultaneously committing every wrong from theft to genocide, and glorifying their elevated worth that requires the belittling and oppression of others.

As we tend to measure wealth by how much stuff we have, and our MOE tally is a measure of our ability to aquire stuff, our status seekers modern MOE is in itself worthless without its believers, especially its digital form, as we can at least burn paper money to start a fire. This equates to our MOEM being in control of all who bow to their religion of money, and as is the practice with all religions, many are forced to become followers or face the wrath of all who believe their glorified liars.

With most obeying our money gods, it is easier for them to act like the gods they see themselves as in murdering those who oppose them or destroying the worlds of any less obedient groups. As our MOE is only worth the collective perception of worth within a population, our sockmaker can take advantage of these populations’ perceptions in order to attain much, if not all of their stuff, and at no cost to themselves other than the straining of a finger on a keyboard that can buy an army of wrongdoers.

Everything from our time, family, lives, property, goods and resources are given away in return for these magical digital numbers or digital socks that we cannot shelter in, eat, drink or use for transportation, void of a shared belief. Monopolising our MOE is by far the easiest strategy in known history that we have used to enslave large populations, nations, continents and almost all of the world. A strategy that will continue to be used for as long as our percentage of contented slaves believe the lies of their most glorified wrongdoers.

Many are encouraged to define themselves and others not only by how many socks they have but how they collect them, in other words, their profession or their jobs. As our sockmaker can make as many socks as they please in a moment, and with most of their debt slaves forced into jobs yielding little above a minimal existence that is orchestrated to serve the greed of a few, all who exchange their time and effort for their master’s socks, will always be their slaves.

The Obedient Slave

Our status seekers work hard to produce obedient and even contented slaves, as they are more productive for them, and with almost everyone within today’s cultures reliant of a MOE for their basic survival, our MOEM have created the most obedient and contented slaves we have ever produced on such a scale, by using paper and ink, instead of iron and whips, accompanied with the usual lies and force, of course. Traditional slaves were bound with iron to prevent them from escaping to lands that were free from their enslavers, but for the modern-day debt slaves, who are bound to our sockmaker’s products, there is almost nowhere to escape to, as almost everywhere, everything and everyone is already owned by or under the control of our sockmaker. So with no need for any iron chains, our debt slaves can be declared as “free”, at least if only in comparison to our traditional slaves’ bodies.

Trying to convince any adult that has valued a set of lies from childhood, to re-examine their beliefs and ignorances, is rarely going to go down well at the best of times, and is almost always a thankless task that can easily be interpreted as patronising or manipulative. But let’s say we tried to enlighten such slaves to the realities of their manipulated contentment. There could be little reason for them to alter their mindset, as what would they gain by doing so? If we have grown to interpret lies as truths, it is not always easy to question those lies too much, and with many encouraged to attach their very identity to many of these lies, we can understand that few of us are ever that interested in meandering down the path of self-uncertainty that can become an identity crisis.

Even if, as an obedient slave, we had any desire to contemplate the idea that we have been lied to all our lives, or just examine our beliefs and understandings a little more closely, to undo years or decades of indoctrination and ignorances would take a bit of time. When we also consider the fact that most, if not all, of those that surround us within our communities and even our own families, will likely possess similar beliefs and ignorances, it can make any attempt more difficult for us, with the risk of being alienated and belittled for straying from the groups perceptions.

As contented slaves, with our compliance to aid our champions of differing worth, we can go about our lives believing right is wrong and wrong is right or anything else we are told to believe, in exchange for less harm befalling us. And as long as we feed the greed of a few, we have a degree of worth within our master’s society. If we did come to the realization that we are being used and manipulated, not for any greater good but just to serve the base desires of a few and aid in their wrongdoing, we could argue that this helps us in no way, and more than likely hinders us if we begin to step out of our hierarchies narrow behaviours of compliance that is expected of any good slave or citizen.

It may be somewhat unfair to ask the question, how do we make a contented slave a bastion of truth, justice and freedom when their environments are as far removed from this as they can be? By accepting or even embracing all the lies, injustices and oppression that hold great worth within our cultures, we can argue that being a contented (or even just an obedient) slave is inevitable, as all life adapts to its environments.

We could argue that contented slaves are merely more accepting of (and more willing to) participate in these tyrannical environments, while discontented ones struggle more than others to accept living a lie. But perhaps this is being overly kind to ourselves. Of course, not all contented or obedient slaves are oblivious to the realities of the glorification of differing worth.

Many are more than aware of their slavery, but without any other real alternative or even the possibility of one, should we really criticize any slave that recognises the reality of how cruel social hierarchies are to those that stand for anything of worth or stray beyond their control, while still accepting their servitude to such cruelty?

Although if we wish to have anything better than a master/slave society, we stand more chance of convincing our slaves to refrain from serving their glorified wrongdoers than we have of convincing our glorified wrongdoers to refrain from exploiting their slaves. Masters always broadcast the costs of disobedience but never the steeper costs of obedience to the few. Without disobedience to tyranny (no matter how much it is cloaked in morality or democracy), our large-scale cultures will never evolve beyond the masters/slaves dynamic.

Billions of people bowing to the will of our MOEM is arguably enough to know we are not as intelligent as we think we are. This reality that we live in begs the question, why do billions accept all manner of wrongs inflicted upon each other, just to get their hands on another man’s socks, when they could easily make their own? Well, we could pin it all on our percentage of status seekers within every group that help those billions to become divided by force and ignorances, at the behest of the few that are united by malice and greed.

This divide and conquer strategy aids in tackling bigger groups in stages. Our social hierarchies are often just the largest organised group that back their interests with every wrong imaginable. A large organised group can oppress billions by taking them on bit by bit, so that the few always outnumber the many. Let’s say we have an army of 100 taking on an army of 1000, being outnumbered 10 to 1 isn’t great odds, so what if that 100 takes on just 10 at a time to switch those odds in their favour. Instead of engaging in one battle against 1000 where we are likely doomed, we can engage in 100 battles where we can’t lose. This is in effect the strategy of all social hierarchies.

However, today, they prefer even better odds than this, and by dividing communities and families, and making it a crime for groups to unite against them, more often than not, the odds are usually millions of glorified wrongdoers against one individual. And they still insist on calling themselves brave, even with these odds. By causing divisions within any large group, a small group can, in time, pick off the larger group, and individuals stand little chance against any united group. A monopolised MOE is a great divider, as is all the divisions of ignorance, status and power that fall from its table. All we have to do to counter the ill intent that comes with monopolising this tool is to give all equal wealth, or at least equal opportunity of wealth, with an inclusive MOE that grants all equal worth. Uniting our nations of slaves would be a start, though easier said than done with our status seekers at the helm of our cults, lurking around every corner waiting for any opportunity to harm those they perceive as less-than.

We only have to look at the practices and the people, families and groups that own most of the corporations that are used to legitimise the mass fraud that is our monopolised MOE, to get a sense of the depth of corruption and malice that is required to reduce a MOE to a medium of control on such a global scale. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), who are, of course, owned by our sockmakers (who isn’t?), give loans with such extortionate interest rates that they know can’t be paid back, in order to privatise and commandeer the services and resources of their targeted hierarchy.

Whenever any country refuses the terms the IMF wish to impose upon them, they are immediately flooded with sanctions, armies and mercenaries from the nations that the IMF have already enslaved, to create violent factions within the targeted country that will destroy their economy while slaughtering their populations, in a bid to ensure their terms of creating a slave nation are accepted. Or they just go in and replace their targeted leadership with their own to secure the compliance they demand.

Our greatest strength is often our greatest weakness, and for social hierarchies this is no different. Their strength lies in their ability to divide those they wish to enslave and manage the factions they create in order to avoid facing a united foe set on revenge. However, this strength becomes a weakness that can be exploited by any invader or sockmaker, who can simply befriend all the many factions who have been wronged by an established social hierarchy, and use them to topple the hierarchy that refused the invaders’ terms and replace them with those they now own.

The Bank of International Settlements sells itself as the supporters of central bankers by acting as the bank for central banks. So not a hint of nonsense there then. Guess who owns this bank of banks? Yep, the same wonderful folk that can make themselves trillionaires every second. This modern-day king of kings can aid those who are subservient to their interests and destroy those who have little desire in pandering to them, all while claiming to “foster a culture of diversity, inclusion, sustainability and social responsibility” as well as to “act with integrity”. Even a bad fiction writer could not make this stuff up.

The religion of money has its fanatics, like every other religion or lie that feeds the greed of a few, and the reaction of any young child being told about the religion of money by an adult believer tells us all we need to know about how ridiculous valuing the fraud is. While on the subject of religion, even many religions, as well as other groups, have and do practice a no interest on loans policy, because even these lovers of wrongdoing know the destructive force this simple act has on the cultures that practice it. Hence why, our sockmakers are often forced out of many groups.

Even today, in our era of mass acceptance of interest, religious and other groups that have not yet been converted into glorifying the interest on loans, are demonised by our sockmaker and their champions of greed. Having just one state in the world that doesn’t use the excessive exploitation of interest causes a real problem for or sockmakers world domination ideals. But their propagandists can always sell such states as bad/terrorists/barbarians/uncivilized or whatever their slaves need to hear in order to murder their populations.

When we borrow something from others, the idea of giving them back what we borrowed is, and has been, common sense for most human beings. But in order to quench the greed of our glorified wrongdoers, most of us have been conditioned to accept giving back twice or thrice as much (or even more) when borrowing. Imagine we borrowed a car, lawnmower, ladder, bike, tool…etc., from someone, and we were expected to give back two, three or more cars, lawnmowers, ladders, bikes, tools...etc., back to the lender.

No one would be keen on borrow anything, and everyone would be pleading for and even forcing others to borrow their stuff, just like private banks do. This anti-sharing behaviour is also great for destroying any sense of community among many groups. Borrowing a MOE did not always involve a doubling or trebling of the debt owed, but this usury is certainly common now in the age of the debt slave system. Paying interest on what we borrow can lead to a small debts becoming huge debts, and this is one of the easiest ways we can exploit and steal from others, while selling ourselves as righteous and valuable members of our communities.

If we compare a bank that would hold gold in exchange for paper to our modern banking system, the goldsmiths could only imagine such a lucrative way of exploiting people. Let’s say every customer of a bank that deals in a MOE based on gold turn up one day to demand their gold back that the bank has already stolen from them, that bank is in big trouble.

Now fast-forward to today’s grand thieves, and even if every individual on the planet turned up at these banks to demand back their MOE, which is based on a belief (and a load of glorified wrongdoing), the bank can easily supply everyone with as many digits on a screen as they wish. If this caused a raise in wealth within the slave classes that they need to exploit, all they would have to do is raise inflation to make the MOE worth less and therefore maintain the extremes in differing worth. The “too big to fail” nonsense is used in a futile attempt to hide the fact that hierarchies that accept and glorify such frauds are owned by our sockmakers. Although there will always be a percentage of their slaves that will value such a lie.

Use My Money, or Else!

Banking is built on fictions, as is their legal systems, and the human beings that hide behind these fictions can exploit others easily when such a system of nonsense is given value. Banks don’t lend to people, they lend to their fictions. Just as the legal system does not harm people, only those that attach themselves to their fictions. No human being can have a bank account, only their legal fiction. Human beings that re-present themselves as a fiction (or a load of nonsense) can have wealth in a bank, and banks are allowed to steal (or seize, as they prefer to call it) from legal fictions but not human beings, as they have the right to own property, apparently, well, unless they are a less-than, of course.

Lending to social hierarchies or governments is always more attractive for any MOEM, as, unlike other groups or individuals, slave trade corporations that sell themselves as governments, almost always pay back their loans, as they have a population of slaves they can forever steal from and use as collateral. With governments forced labour backing their ability to repay loans, our sockmaker encourages their social hierarchies to force many to be obedient taxpayers that will always feed their greed.

The interest-free Bradbury pound that was issued at the start of ww1, as the population rushed to get their own money from the bankers who orchestrated the war and who, of course, had already stolen it to feed their greed, is one example of an alternative MOE that any sovereign nation can use that does not inflict crippling interest onto that nation or its population. But as this hierarchy is so owned by our sockmaker, it is perhaps a bad example, as it only happened with their owners consent. Our sockmakers are not too keen on anyone having their own MOE.

By using their own MOE, a state does not have to pay interest to themselves, so no ever-growing debt accumulates. But by adopting the farce of “borrowing” a MOE from a different private corporation and then repaying huge amounts of interest on top of any magically manifested loan, our sockmaker gets to enslave whole nations that are forever indebted to them. Why doesn’t every state make their own MOE rather than allowing themselves to become beholden to our sockmaker? You may ask! Well, our history and the present shows that it never ends well for those that refuse to bow to our money-mad monopolisers, as every individual and state that has resisted the desire to live under the boot of our sockmaker, know only too well the level of malice that spews from our MOEM. That, and the fact that most hierarchies are owned by them and those that resist end up being destroyed or ostracised by every other hierarchy that lives on their knees. Just ask North Korea.

Any medium of exchange system free from our sockmaker’s monopoly that hints at gaining widespread use, will always be met with force, as it threatens their control, and the creators of such a thing will always be targeted by the puppet politicians, armies, governments and countries they own. When you control most states and can buy anyone who is willing to sell themselves, it is not too difficult to buy any social hierarchy that is brimming with ignorant minds. And if that proves fruitless, the power wealth has over many can be used to threaten, strangle, or even destroy any state into submission that refuses to become our sockmaker’s slaves. We only have to look at the world’s most demonised countries to understand the power our sockmaker have over the minds of our highly conditioned and suggestible populations.

The only way to end the vilification of a less prolific wrongdoing hierarchy, compared to the ones our sockmakers use, is when our sockmaker takes control of their MOE. As only when they are enslaved by our sockmaker do they become a worthy and respectable state. Our history is littered with a trail of death and destruction of all those that defied our sockmaker, with endless genocides glorified in the name of any lie that their greed hides behind.

With such control over our tools of exchange, and with whole populations or countries able to be brought to their knees and devastated even without the costs of a single soldier having to go in and destroy communities, we no longer need a mass horde to destroy what we build, when our sockmaker can achieve the same results by simple monopolizing our populations MOE to prop up or bring down economies. Controlling the “finances” of all who rely on it, is the same as controlling all who rely on it.

Our sockmaker’s empire can easily outlast their territorial and religious counterparts that rely on their slaves to believe in their borders, flags and gods. No matter how much value we put on these lies, we tend to value the belief in money a lot more. Our sockmakers habit of hiding in the shadows behind their puppets to avoid any backlash from their incessant wrongdoing always helps with their longevity. As we can force our slaves to value almost any lie that comes with a group identity, these identities change like the wind, especially when forced into valuing one over another.

However, as the fiction of money is so entrenched as a measure of differing worth among our status seekers, most who attach their identity to being a more-than, will value this fiction above others, regardless of how many they may be required to adopt. We can grant ourselves all the titles and status in the world, but if we lack our main source of worth, then they mean little. If the title of the world’s smelliest person comes with the prize of becoming a billionaire, many would covet such a title and be rolling in anything that came out the back end of any passing animal, but if such a title came with the prize of a bar of soap, few would be interested in it.

Our money empires do the opposite of our other forms of empire, in that although they all rely on secrecy, our MOEM use anonymity to distance themselves from their slaves to the point where few even know of their existence. Whereas our other forms rely on their prominence to add credence to their dogma of superiority, which relies on a degree of fame to promote the adulation and hero worshipping hierarchies desire. As the later method attracts more attention, these empires tends to invite bigger targets upon them from those seeking justice for the wrongs they inflict upon so many.

Our MOEM have been around for a long time, and what family is going to give up their golden goose that guarantees them so much wealth, power and control over so many, when it is so easy to get away with it all. Needless to say, our MOEM empires deeds are immersed within our known history going back thousands of years, even if they have attempted to omit themselves to avoid any scrutiny. The installation of central banks that have invaded almost every country in the world over the last 300 years or so has played a huge part in the rise of the debt slave system. It is no coincidence that one of the oldest central banks that still exists to this day is in the country that started and encouraged the transition from the relatively low profitability of traditional slavery, to the hugely profitable debt slave system.

With estimates ranging from 20% to 75% of a population being slaves in various social hierarchies around the world under the traditional slavery system, we have now restricted our free peoples even further, as we have enslaved around 99.9% of the world’s population using the modern debt slave system to varying degrees of servitude to the greed of a few. It does not matter where we are on the spectrum of debt slavery or our degree of worth, if we oppose our sockmaker, all of our wealth and even our lives can be taken from us at the touch of a button under this system.

As whole countries become slaves to these glorified wrongdoers, their chains of slavery are rebranded as “national debt” in an attempt to convince their populations to believe they are a free people. As there is no war our sockmakers do not profit from when funding both sides into huge debts, this ensures they are the only true winners from our endless warring, so continuous war is always going to be a useful tool for them. As our sockmaker is incentivised to start wars to force states into borrowing, to fund the destruction and then the rebuild, as well as create desperate slaves, this cycle will always continue.

Two of our sockmaker’s most popular wars of late, within the orgies of our glorified wrongdoer’s greatest hits, may have been sold to the more suggestible among us as battles of good v evil, but this lie is repeated time and time again as a front to their true intent of monopolising our MOE and resources. As Germany were not too keen on the boom and bust strategy of our sockmakers, or being enslaved by them, they faced the same choice that many of today’s less obedient states do.

So after a couple of scuffles, where our sockmaker’s central banking system “persuaded” the more stable cooperative banks of Germany to bow to their might, Germany went from evil empire when resistant to our sockmaker’s will, to a valued member of our sockmaker’s portfolio of vassal states. World War 1 allowed our sockmaker to take control of Germany’s MOE and eliminate gold being used as coins in Germany, as gold puts limits on their ability to create vast wealth from nothing, thus limiting their control, as there are only so many gold coins we can create, but have no such restrictions on an unlimited supply of paper notes or digital numbers. To this day, those who hint at creating a MOE using gold coins still find themselves surrounded by our sockmaker’s slave armies.

So why was Germany the North Korea of its time? You may ask. Well, simple, because our sockmaker did not have total control of their MOE, just as they don’t control North Korea’s (yet). Between the late 19th and early 20th century, Germany had a better economy and a more advanced society than their competing hierarchies, and as they were unwelcome latecomers to our MOEM Europe’s table of colonialism, they were only going to become stronger and stronger, just as all that dine at the table of mass wrongdoing tend to do. With the envious eyes of their competing glorified wrongdoers upon them, Germany was an obvious target for our sockmaker and the slave hierarchies they owned.

By lining up a series of events and using the kind of well-worn logical gymnastics that only our glorified wrongdoers can get away with, our sockmaker declared Germany as solely responsible for WW1 in order to remove the threat of a stable banking system interfering with their more socially oppressive and unstable banking system. This, in effect, made Germany the debt slaves of our sockmakers, and by controlling their economy and hierarchy, they reduced their society to a shadow of what it once was. Financial extremism or financial terrorism may not be the buzz words thrown around the marketing departments of our MOEM, but this is exactly what our MOEM engage in.

After WW1, our sockmaker reduced the very stable Goldmark (backed by gold as the name suggests) to the Papiermark, which was much easier for our sockmaker to manipulate (anyone seeing a pattern here?). Then, in 1924, this was replaced by the Reichsmark, and with the usual underhand practices our sockmakers partake in, this was manipulated back onto the gold standard by creating secret monetary expansion without formally renouncing its connection to the gold standard. A great magic trick that overvalues its worth. So, with the same fraudulent practices we see time and time again, of using financial control to destroy the less obedient, WW2 completed the “takeover bid” of the German economy in order to limit its threat to our sockmakers control in Europe.

The Bank deutscher Lander central bank was formed in March 1948, and in the same year, Germany's new Deutsche Mark banknotes were produced in the land of their conquerors, as is normally the case in the aftermath of fighting wars to control a populations MOE. This bank went on to be replaced with the Deutsche Bundesbank in 1957, and these forced replacements have aided in reducing Germany to a vassal state ever since, and reducing their population to the same standard of debt slaves as the rest of their vassal states.

This laid the foundations of our sockmaker’s Euro currency across much of Europe, making it even easier to manipulate all who use it. Any MOE that is backed by nothing but violence will always result in the use of violence. So here we are, with WW3 and a new “bad guy” that won’t use their money always lurking around the corner.

As Europe fell to history’s most evil empire, our sockmaker’s minions were again unleashed onto the rest of the world. When enough people were murdered and communities destroyed, a central bank would be installed within the defeated nations to ensure complete control of all within them. With few countries left to resist our sockmakers central bank takeover system, we are arguably not too far away from having our first real global empire, which has total control over all the world’s MOE and the human worth attached to it.

Just a few more lies and a whole load of wrongdoing, and these few may fall too. With such an unprecedented level of control in our known history, we can imagine the ensuing results to our freedoms from reducing everyone on the planet to an extreme debt slave will be dire. Even though almost every country has bowed to the tyranny of our MOEM, those that have been conquered can retake control, and more will inevitably rebel, as all lies have a shelf life.

We only have to look at how countries that show any resistance have been treated so vilely by all under the control of our sockmakers, to understand the lengths they will go to in their bid to be our planet’s MOEM. The ferocity of the continuous contemptuous, demonising and belittling of anyone free from their grasp is so far and beyond reason or reality it is a wonder anyone falls for it.

However, with the astonishing levels of ignorances most within these controlled populations are encouraged to adopt, many are content to blind themselves to basic logic and reason, though we must always give credit to our belongers and status seekers for much of this. Let us just examine one of the most obvious lies and idiocies that is rolled out as an excuse to commit and glorify genocide under the guise of spreading democracy. The nuclear weapons hypocrisy.

On the subject of nuclear weapons and lies, we can’t not mention the farcical way some of our sockmaker’s puppet hierarchies have used these tools to justify and even glorify their pre-planned genocides and mass theft’s, to gain control over our world’s MOE, resources and industries. So let us just connect with reason for a brief moment and shed a little logic and common sense that their politicians, media and obedient slaves are sadly lacking when it comes to one of their biggest hypocrisies of the last few decades.

These tools of mass destruction (again, assuming they are real) are sold by many of their users and owners as a means to deter others from attacking them. Arguably a fair point. Until, of course, those they want to dominate agree with them and wish to have the very same tools in order to deter others from attacking them (mostly those who have them). However, as these dominant hierarchies are in the business of attacking others while crying victim to rob them of their resources, they conveniently create a double standard that allows them to use these tools and the threat of their use, because they sell themselves as glorious and good, while selling those they wish to attack as evil and bad. Despite their own vastly more extensive record of evil deeds.

By turning the desire of any state to protect itself from an aggressors, into an evil empires thirst for world domination, that must be conquered and brought under the heel of the glorified empire that actually does almost have world domination, our serial attackers somehow glorify themselves and the orgy of wrongdoing they inflict upon others as something to be valued, instead of condemned. Most among their glorified status seekers and suggestible slaves play along, as they champion such nonsense to gain social worth within these dens of hypocrisy. Countries not too keen on the idea of having our sockmaker ruling over them are sold as these evil empires that go about committing all the worlds wrongs, while those accusing them of such things turn from any mirror that accurately reflects their accusations back at them.

With our sockmaker sending their slave countries to invade other countries, consistently year-on-year, as well as overthrowing social hierarchies that attempt to rid themselves of their control, the fact that the demonised countries are far more peaceful seems to matter little in the minds of those that champion debt slavery.

So we get our sockmaker’s controlled countries that have nukes, declaring their demonised countries as monsters who must be destroyed because they want the same right to defend themselves, just as our sockmakers controlled hierarchies do. And the cherry on top of this layer cake of hypocrisy is that these controlled countries that are enslaved by their debt masters, declare their desire for world domination as “the spreading of freedom and democracy” when they all live under veiled dictatorships themselves. Yeah! Let’s take a minute to enjoy that one.

As our MOEM recently conquered countries begin their journey as a debt slave nation, having to accept ridiculous loans that will keep them forever indebted to our sockmakers, they suddenly become a welcomed addition to the rest of the world, who have joined the debt slave trade. No prizes for guessing the last remaining empires of evil that are on our sockmaker’s hit list, those doers of wrong, those less-thans and monsters who are constantly raping the world of all that is good...apparently.

Everyone knows about the endless military bases these “bad” countries have all around the world that are primed to invade anyone at a moment’s notice to keep their evil empires burning bright, or do they? Well, of course, they don’t, as it’s all just lies to justify genocides and every wrong we can commit. Our sockmaker’s most glorified and dominant puppet hierarchy has at least over 800 military bases in 85 countries, and even more secret bases hidden away.

Yet somehow they have convinced many to believe that a “bad” country that attacks no other is a threat to the world, while these “good” or self-glorifying countries that invade half the world while threatening the other half are no threat at all, despite the mountains of corpses their genocides produce.

Anyone would think there must be no corner of the world free from these so-called invading hordes, yet we would find it hard to go anywhere on the planet where any of the controlled countries have not invaded. Needless to say, if we were to ignore the words of our glorified liars and examine their actions to compare the number of invasions inflicted upon the people of the world, between our sockmaker’s glorified countries and their demonised countries, our sockmaker’s minions are miles ahead. Oh well, let’s not allow the truth to get in the way of a wonderful goody v baddy story that so many of us are fond of.

If we are to use the good guys v bad guys analogy, many who have been indoctrinated within our money monopolists societies would struggle to even consider the idea that the bad guy won their world wars, such is the level of lies these cultures are immersed in. If we stick to WW2 for a moment, maybe few good slaves know or even care that our MOEM held meetings in Switzerland with all sides during the course of the entire war, not to broker peace but to ensure all parties have sufficient funds to continue the wholesale slaughter of millions, all while ensuring they themselves profit hugely from the murder of millions, of course. A pattern that many who spend their time fixating over their master’s ideologies seem to be oblivious to.

Shall we compare the level of wrongdoing committed by these “bad” countries, to each “good” country that demonises them? Maybe not, this book is long enough, but we can’t fully understand our wars over the last 300 years (and beyond) without understanding our money monopolist’s involvement in the events of this time period. With a monopoly on the production of money, any group can fall to our sockmaker by exploiting the greed of a few within any hierarchy who are happy to sell their territory and kin.

Creating a problem for people, then offering a solution to that problem, is a practice we have used to manipulate others for a very long time. So by impoverishing people to create debt slaves and destroying nations with war and economic sanctions to create slave nations, our sockmakers always have the solution to all the problems they create with their endless supply of debt.

The Price of Tyranny

If we are going to enter the magical world of our sockmaker’s manipulations to value money more than logic, shall we just tap the tip of the iceberg on the costs of the incessant glorified wrongdoing that is war on a monetary level, as the human costs hold less value for our social hierarchies. So as of 2023, we spend at least $2.2 trillion on trying to dominate, control and murder each other, all so a few can live a life of luxury, while most are forced to spend their lives trying to justify their existence.

As is our tradition, our single most prolific wrongdoers spend the most, with almost 40% of this $2.2 trillion being used to steal from, as well as maim and murder others. Now for those of us who have been convinced to be outraged when an unemployed person gets their precious taxes to barely feed themselves or their family, and rejoice in thanks to anyone in a uniform for their service to the greed of a few and all the horrific acts that this entails, this may seem like a wonderful activity to spend our wealth on, but many see the insanity of it all.

If we are sticking with the belief in our money, then imagine how much good, instead of wrongdoing, we could do with $2.2 trillion. We could build infrastructures, houses, roads, bridges, tools, factories, hospitals, schools…etc., instead of blowing them all to bits. We could train real teachers, doctors, scientists, engineers...etc., instead of obedient soldiers intent on killing each other. We could develop technologies designed to aid our lives instead of ones designed to end our lives.

We could feed people instead of starving people. We could spread our wealth to reduce gross inequality, OK, that last one went a bit too far, let’s not get carried away with ourselves. We almost entered into a world of reason for a moment there. As we step back within our cultures of greed, the greedy must force their wrongs onto others, then be protected from those they wronged. So spending on the security of a few will always be our hierarchies’ priority, hence their need to call their minion enforcers heroes to a hysterical level.

A child that still retains the ability to ask themselves the simplest of questions can work out the cultures they have been born into, like - who controls the people or populations? ...enforcers. Who controls enforcers? ...governments. Who controls governments? …the owners of our MOE. Who controls the owners of our MOE? ...don’t ask. Well, that didn’t take too long. It may be more obvious to some than it is to others that all who use and have been made dependent on our MOE are enslaved by the owners of our MOE, and our acceptance of injustice and inequality can play a big role in how long it takes us to become aware of our master/slave cultures, if we ever, do for that matter.

With our populations of obedient slaves outnumbering our population of disobedient slaves at around 4-1 (if we accept the percentages of suggestibility), it is very easy for our glorified wrongdoers to deal with those from every generation who refuse their master’s wishes to not question the ill intent and wrongs they inflict upon us. For every disobedient slave, there are many obedient slaves who will gladly murder them in exchange for a fraction of a sliver of their master’s wealth and status. If all who serve the malice of our sockmaker realised that it is not their neighbours, the unemployed, migrants, political opponents, differing nationalities or fictions that are their enemy, but their social hierarchies and those who monopolise the MOE they use, then maybe we could address the endless poverty, enslavement, rape, murder and wars that are the result of gifting a tiny few with so much power over us all.

Our MOE does not have to be reduced to a medium of differing worth. If our money and wealth is based on our beliefs, maybe we need to alter our beliefs, although we may need a bit more than chanting “I believe I am rich, so therefore I am rich” to spread our wealth more evenly among us. To avoid gross inequality, we must have an inclusive MOE that is transparent to all, as handing exclusivity of such an important tool for our social systems to a few is always going to end up the same way.

There are many ways we could create a fairer, transparent, inclusive and more stable MOE that does not lead to a sockmaker’s utopia, although achieving this under any social hierarchy will always be difficult, as few masters value equality. If we ever get beyond our status-driven social systems and recognise the worth of all, then we are more than capable of creating a world of abundance for all. Within such a world, we could have a MOE that we all know and understand, instead of a financial systems that is based on deceit.

Just for fun, let’s look at one such lucrative deception. Seigniorage, instead of scamming, is a term our MOEM uses to describe the difference between the cost of producing a MOE and the accepted value of a MOE. So if a £20 note costs 0.3p to make, then the profit is £19.99.7, and if a £100 note costs 0.3p to make, then the profit of its production is £99.99.7. If we take the production costs of digital currency, then whether we produce £1 or £1 trillion, the cost of holding a key for a little longer can generate endless profit margins. So if a loan of one million only costs the pressing of a button, why not pay it back with the pressing of a button, rather than using our time, effort and resources to do so.

As only a small percentage of money is now in the physical form of paper and coins, while almost all is in digital form, we can certainly see the benefits to becoming a digital sockmaker over a physical one. Hence, the push to digital with the help of Covid-19. What self-respecting status seekers wouldn’t want to be the ones creating vast wealth with the touch of a button, rather than earning it with toil and time? With the creation of such positions always being coveted by their fellow status seekers, and other hierarchies wishing to emulate at least part of our sockmakers practices in order to compete for the crown of controlling most or all of our populations’ MOE, the wars to control our sockmakers’ empires will last as long as we use an exclusive MOE.

Time is the one medium of exchange we all engage with, and although some of us will inevitably have more than others, time is equal for everyone. Within our cultures of differing worth, time is sold as more valuable to those with status than those without, an ignorance mainly in the minds of those immersed in the more-than camp, obviously. With our status seekers habit of robbing others of their time, in so many more ways than one, a less imbalanced culture would hand people much of their time back to them, as there would be far less need for the mass scale of wastefulness such groups of greed are mired in.

We all trade in the time we have, and we all give it to and take it from others. Whether we believe our time is worth more, often depending on a comparable amount of socks we attain from that time. We are all robbed of a share of our time, and we all gladly give it to others, making time the original and everlasting MOE. Our time is the most precious MOE we will ever have, so we should spend it wisely. Many don’t realise how precious it is until it is too late. Far too many of us are forced to pay too much of our time in exchange for too little, but we can change this if enough of us want equal worth over differing worth. We don’t need these glorified wrongdoing intermediaries to control our ability to exchange with one another. We are capable of creating a MOE that is free from our wrongdoer’s third party manipulations.

Communities are always divided as a means of control, and even the efforts put in by many to unite their fractured communities are often undermined and belittled by their hierarchy. Any effort that is effective at uniting communities outside of the set parameters that are decreed as holding no threat to gross inequality or injustice will have their hierarchy sniffing around to syphon off as much wealth as they can take, in order to limit and control its effectiveness. Those who have little desire to cooperate in feeding the greed of the few but wish to aid their community, will find themselves targeted by their hierarchy and harmed in any way possible, even when they have done nothing but good for their communities.

When within our cultures that let no good deed go unpunished, it is understandable that many don’t even bother trying after a while. This suffocating grip our sockmakers has on our populations ensure united communities are the exception rather than the rule. There is a unity that only comes with equality, a bonding of mutual respect that is destroyed within cultures of extreme gross inequality. Those at both extremes of our wealth and status divides can often experience more social isolation from those deemed to be in the middle of our ludicrous MOE human measuring tools. The social destruction of differing worth affects everyone, even those who benefit from it the most and recognise it the least.

Chapter 7

Law and Order v Right and Wrong

From the smallest village to the largest empire, or a small group of benevolent hunter-gatherers to a large, ignorant and malicious population ruled by a hierarchy, regardless of the size or the preferred intent of the social groups we form, our sense of right and wrong is always present, even if it is corrupted by extreme ignorances. Within our groups of differing worth, we tend to establish a set of rules for the group to function to the advantage of those who govern them.

Their laws may be sold to mimic justice, but as all social hierarchies must portray rights as wrongs and wrongs as rights in order to hide, justify, glorify and moralize their wrongdoings that fuel their elevated worth, few on the receiving end of such unjust laws buy their hierarchy’s lies. Laws may be sold as an attempt to form a cohesive group and control wrongdoing (or monopolise it in the case of social hierarchies), but as all cultures of differing worth spend their time dividing groups and inflicting gross wrongs upon them, their laws are just another tool that is used to reward the overly obedient few and exploit the many.

Any justice system or laws that are worth valuing would be best achieved when everyone is aware of the laws and has equal access to a remedy when they have been wronged. But, of course, within all social hierarchies, this basic principle of any social group becomes corrupted like everything that is touched by the ignorance of differing worth. Although creating laws to limit wrongdoing will apply to many of our groups, it becomes less relevant within our social hierarchal groups, as they are held together with wrongdoing and violence, and not a mutual respect for one another. Wrongdoers are never going to be capable of creating a justice system, so we end up with the buffoonery that they try to pass off as justice.

Our cultures of differing worth may have their justice systems, but they exist merely to satisfy their lust for appearance over substance. If they were capable of creating a justice system of any worth, they would have little time for anything other than prosecuting themselves. These systems of justice that are created by the unjust set a very low bar for justice, as we would expect from those overly keen on practicing injustices. So let’s explore the murky world of our social hierarchies’ injustice systems, to examine how they are used to convince many that wrongs are right and rights are wrong, and how they glorify the dehumanizing practices and treatments they engage in.

We could argue that most of us (if not all) know instinctively what is right and what is wrong, at least to some degree, but our environments can play a huge role in our perceptions of right and wrong. The sense of right and wrong is like any other emotion, in that we can feel it regardless of what those around us wish us to feel. Its depth of feeling can persist even when ridicule awaits us if we refuse to mimic the ignorances and feelings of those around us for a degree of acceptance.

Our sense of right and wrong can be just as consuming as our sense of love, hate, joy, sadness...etc. Our instincts of right and wrong can be reinforced by our environments or corrupted by them, and so within any social hierarchy, as right and wrong is largely subject to social status, those that value the ignorance of differing worth will always have contradictory definitions of right and wrong. We are all more than capable of perceiving a wrong as right and vice versa, but the more ignorant we are, the more we can struggle to differentiate between the two.

We only have to observe the huge scale of hypocrisy and contradictions that all social hierarchies and their status seekers peddle in, to witness how easy it is to convince ourselves of the righteousness in the wrongs we commit when we suffer from the ignorance of differing worth. We can all use our greed, fear and ignorances to aid our hierarchy by adopting the behaviours and mindset of those around us.

The rules of any hierarchal group are made-up by the hierarchy in order to serve the hierarchy, if those rules were made by all within the whole group, they would serve the whole group, but they are not. The rules and the laws of privileged males are a pale shadow of the instincts of right and wrong that we all share, yet many of us put aside those instincts and feelings to win the favour of those who make unjust laws when we are within an environment that give wrongdoing value, as this is not only encouraged but rewarded.

Social hierarchies and their minions can use social status to justify any wrong. Even the murder of thousands or millions of people can be sold as a right when our wrongdoers know they will never be threatened with any consequences for their wrongs. Our glorified wrongdoers can steal from, defraud, abuse, kidnap, imprison, assault, rape, torture, maim and murder anyone they wish within their populations, knowing the justice system they own will protect them. As no one is going to imprison themselves, social hierarchal justice systems have no need to value right or wrong, nor justice, allowing hierarchies and their minions to embrace their ignorance and malice. These hierarchal justice systems’ main role is to sell the pretence of justice, while exploiting the population under their control to maintain the order of masters and slaves that all social hierarchies are built on.

No large social hierarchy teaches their laws or how to seek a remedy to the people they wish to exploit, for obvious reasons. Instead, they monopolise access to their justice systems. This allows our hierarchies and sockmakers to ensure only those willing to abandon or corrupt their sense of right and wrong, can participate in a system that always serve their masters’ interests. Imagine if everyone in a population knew the law and had access to a system of justice that treated everyone the same.

This would threaten those of high social status, as even those deemed to be of low-status could gain justice over any wrongdoers, regardless of their elevated worth. The notion of a fair trial or due process of law for all, within any group that values differing worth, is ridiculously farcical. So it is never going to happen within cultures that value social status. Within our social hierarchies that are brimming with wrongdoers, the appearance of justice will always be more important than justice, and despite their thin veils that are used to mask mass wrongdoing, there will always be those that see through them.

Right and wrong is almost stupidly simple. Harm nobody kind of covers most of it, but, of course, one individual’s interpretation of harm can be different from another’s. Most would agree that harming someone would include stealing, assaulting or killing. However, even these wrongs can turn into rights under the right circumstances, and many may argue over such right circumstances, so maybe not as simple for some after all.

The context of an action is crucial in determining it as just or unjust, so our glorified wrongdoers are always manipulating and controlling the context of the actions they wish to demonise and glorify to suit their own interests. As do many individuals. Social hierarchies rely on the blurring of circumstance to convince their followers (or subordinates, as they like to call them) to engage in these wrongs. This blurring of the truth or plain old lying can often be as simple as installing a belief in the good guy/bad guy nonsense that many of us use to justify the wrongs we commit. So, with a little tweaking within our realms of perspective, almost any wrong can be perceived as just.

With decades of indoctrination into the superficial greatness and righteousness of their social hierarchy, we can at least understand why so many subordinates engaged in the mass wrongdoing that all social hierarchies need to engage in to ensure dominance over their populations or competing hierarchies. However, there is more than brainwashing afoot when so many appear so willing to become a pawn or enforcer to the greed of a few.

Even if all under a social hierarchy were aware of every lie and every wrong, we could argue that just with the practice of bestowing more wealth and status on obedient slaves over disobedient ones, they would have more than enough to fill their ranks, void of any concern for right or wrong. Many, or even most, people involved within their hierarchy’s justice systems may believe they are on the side of justice, and will even have many examples to convince them of such a lie, but it always requires selective morals and the abandoning of empathy to a degree, to serve wrongdoers, as when justice is controlled by wrongdoers, it is always very selective.

We could argue that those who have no desire to be treated as more than others, would agree that having laws that condemn all basic wrongs and champion all basic rights is the best way to ensure a harmonious society. While our status seekers need an unharmonious society to gain elevated worth, hence their useless justice systems.

Bearing in mind that a so-called wrong can be right, as in the form of self-defence, there are rights or a sense of justice that many of us value regardless of the laws within the groups we find ourselves mired in, as the when and the where of our wrongdoers laws can have no bearing on right and wrongs to those not indoctrinated into the glory of differing worth. Our sense of justice is part of us all, no matter how it may be manipulated by those around us or even by ourselves. We all use it how we choose, no matter the time or place in which we live, but our environments will always have their influence (in some more than others).

As social hierarchies’ mere existence is to oppress others in order to be viewed as more than, their populations are constantly embroiled in a never-ending battle to satisfy their sense of justice. But no sense of right and wrong will ever be (or not for long) respected by any social hierarchy, unless it benefits them. Any time the remnants of our unadulterated sense of justice or timeless laws (rights forever valued, void of status seekers) are introduced into the laws of our hierarchal groups, they are for their populations to adhere to, and certainly not the social hierarchy or their minions that violate such laws on a daily basis.

Even when elements of our timeless laws become part of a social hierarchy’s justice system, in the case of “Common Law” for example, these laws can be bypassed in many ways at any time that suits the hierarchy. By creating their “games a bogey” laws, such as martial, emergency or the more fashionable terrorist laws, that can be used to ignore and violate the existing laws they pretend to value, social hierarchies can exercise their true nature under the veil of protecting some fiction or group from an imaginary threat. When laws are only valued or enforced when it suits us, then they have no value other than manipulation and are reduced to mere stories that we like to tell ourselves.

By concealing the processes and the magic words attached to the secret languages of their justice systems, as well as having more than one form of law system in place to get around any timeless laws that affects the interests of the hierarchy, hierarchal justice can be a game of laws trumping laws in order to favour those making them, rather than those desiring justice. Many social hierarchies have more than one set of laws to rule over their populations in a bid to sell the idea of a just society. One set of laws that appear just will be held up as great and glorious, while another set of laws that trespass on the rights of all are hidden behind the more just-sounding laws.

We now have these pesky (somewhat) timeless laws in the form of human rights laws, which must be begrudgingly championed by social hierarchies that sell themselves as righteous. But these laws are predominantly just tools used in the PR war between competing social hierarchies who jostle for a superficial moral superiority when engaging in their mass wrongdoing, as this is the only kind of moral superiority they can afford. So we get our hypocritical, self-declared righteous social hierarchies champion human rights when dealing with competing hierarchies, while they totally ignore them when it comes to their own wrongdoing. We cannot expect any individuals or groups that suffer from the ignorance of differing worth, while having power over others, to truly value timeless laws when they know they don’t have to.

Stealing people’s wealth is the basic function of hierarchal laws, and this fuels the ideology of differing worth. But this can be a costly business, as paying for an army of subordinates to subdue and enslave any free people, as well as maintaining their obedience, all comes at a cost. However, these outgoing costs of these glorified thieves are almost always worth the incoming wealth they steal, so from our glorified wrongdoer’s perspective, well worth the cost, if we set aside the human cost of lives wasted and ruined by the whole process that is. Having to constantly pay subordinates to travel to and battle with individuals, families and communities to strip them of their wealth, is all very messy and makes it difficult for any social hierarchy to sell themselves as champions of justice. Well, to some at least. This behaviour can make it so obvious to even the most suggestible that they are just sanctioned thieves and murderers, especially when they bear witness to it. So by using laws to force their slaves to pay taxes and such, hierarchies get to sell their tax fraud thievery as reasonable in the eyes of those who value differing worth.

Right and wrong are terrible concepts to use for any social hierarchy, as they are habitual wrongdoers, but laws and codes, on the other hand can make any wrong acceptable to many within such groups. By glorifying laws and their makers, many can come to respect laws that benefit a few, over basic right and wrong, but it is always foolish to respect laws that are not even respected by those who make them. Most of us don’t need any rich men’s laws to know what is right and what is wrong, and we could argue that most abide by the principles of right and wrong when void of gross harm, inequality and oppression, as many do despite enduring cultures that value such things.

Laws are important to any large society, but when they are at odds with our sense of right and wrong, they deserve all the contempt they inspire, and they are as ineffective at maintaining social harmony as they are at maintaining justice. However, we must bear in mind that these two things are not the goals of any social hierarchy. Hierarchal civilization is the celebration of lawlessness and criminality, but don’t expect any glorified wrongdoer or their status seekers to agree, as they value their immunity to the crimes they commit. Thus, valuing the ignorance of differing worth will always result in the glorification of wrongdoing.

One of the dumbest phrases, saying and even legal principles (a comical concept in itself) that we get from our glorified wrongdoers is “ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law”. Now we are not talking about right and wrong here, as most don’t need hypocritical wrongdoers lecturing them on such things. Instead, this is the deliberate attempt to exploit people who do no wrong. Our malevolent slavemasters are forever conjuring up thousands of new codes or laws in order to excuse their wrongdoing and criminalize those who do no wrong. And if all within these societies had to know every one of them and their constant malicious amendments, no one would have much time for anything else. The laws and codes of social hierarchies are little more than a game where there is only ever one winner.

Rules for Thee Not for Me

If we created a game where we make the rules, but our rules only apply to our opponents, and we can change the rules at any point in order to ensure we are always victorious, then we can claim to be masters of our game. That’s our social hierarchies’ justice systems in a nutshell. It is always in the rule maker’s interest to get as many people as possible to play their game with them, as the more people that play, the more they win. Hence why all large populations are entangled within their hierarchy’s game of unjust laws against their will. This fraud maybe farcical to many, but within the minds of some of our status seekers who attach their worth or identity to a “winner” of such nonsense, this or any form of victory from impossible defeat holds great value.

A social hierarchal justice system is just like any other business or corporate entity. So, like every corporation, they concern themselves with profit. Go into any courthouse, and they even tell you when the courts open that they are always open for business, they are never open for justice. Think of them more like a glorified casino, where some may win now and again, but the house always wins. As with everything under a social hierarchy, appearance is everything, so these courts are in the business of selling the appearance of justice and profiting hugely from it.

With the vast amount of glorified thieving and fraud around our planet being rebranded as justice, the justice industries take vast amounts of profits every year for their shareholders, as they try to distance themselves from being seen as just another corporation that is only concerned with the acquisition of wealth, and instead sell themselves as some kind of authority in right and wrong. As stripping their populations of wealth ensures the extreme obedience of most, while exerting their dominance over any less-thans that are not so keen on obeying every ridiculous extortion racket their hierarchy conjures up, they limit resistance to their wrongdoing.

Justice is always up for sale in these cultures of greed on a corporate and individual level. Corporations can buy new profitable codes or laws, while some individuals who can afford it can break as many as they wish when justice is remedied with money. Let’s say we used hair as the remedy for a crime instead of money. So instead of us being fined x amount of money or giving money to all involved in the justice system to escape our oppression, we give our hair or are fined x amount of meters of hair instead.

Just like money in our cultures that give most little and a few way too much, it would create a very unfair system that would see our jails filled with baldy people, while those with long hair can roam free, breaking laws at will, knowing they can afford to evade justice. Baldies would be targeted by police to increase conviction rates because they are less able to defend themselves from our glorified wrongdoers, and the hairy elite would end up dominating our world.

A grossly unequal society is always going to produce a superficial system of justice that allows wrongs, real and perceived, to be remedied with the medium of worth the hierarchy has in abundance. So we unsurprisingly get those who have plenty of this magical money, creating a system where money is the remedy of most, if not, all crimes. This allows the creators and their followers to almost always evade any real justice for their wrongdoing, while the slave classes, baldies or poor can’t afford the same privilege, thus become open to being used and abused instead. This practice encourages any population to seek whatever medium of worth their hierarchy has monopolised (be it hair or digits on a screen), for if they do not, they will be persecuted to a greater degree than those who do. With money as our medium of worth, the guilty high-status rich can easily escape justice, while the innocent low-status poor cannot afford to escape injustice.

Any individual who commits no wrong, navigating their way through a social hierarchy, will always find themselves in trouble if they insist on doing right. The cost of doing right when surrounded by wrongdoers can be just as steep as the cost of doing wrong when surrounded by rightdoers. On a side note, the fact that wrongdoers is recognised as a word, yet rightdoers is not, says much about such cultures.

Anyway, as always, our environment is everything, but even within our wrongdoer’s paradise of social status that conditions many to value the injustices that prop up the ignorance of differing worth, most are aware at some instinctive level of what is right and what is wrong, yet too many of us often allow our sense of right and wrong to become warped by those around us.

We all start out with a very strong instinct for justice, and anyone in any doubt of this should try dividing a cake among children unequally. The more we try to gain any kind of value within a social hierarchy, the more we must dull this instinct in favour of belonging, acceptanc, status and wealth. Either that or we just fool ourselves into believing that doing wrong is doing right, as long as we belong to the more-than group. Most of us want to be treated fairly, well, right up until we desire or have elevated worth, then we are not so keen on others being treated as well as ourselves.

Once we have deluded ourselves into believing we are so special that we deserve more and want to be treated as more than others, we can become more tolerant to wrongdoing that benefits ourselves and feeds our delusions of superiority. If we are ignorant enough to think we are more-than others, then we become much more capable of harming our own cousins. The ignorance of differing worth is not just harmful at the extreme end of the spectrum, but even in the smallest of doses, it can allow us to justify our wrongs against others. Many of us that only play a supporting role in mass wrongdoing can perceive the less direct actions we do as enablers of wrongdoing, as playing a part in aiding our gloriously elevated heroes.

As social hierarchies are our modern norm, we have these justice industries that are full of criminals and wrongdoers who interfere with human rights every day. But as they are generating great wealth and elevated worth for their masters, they are granted the special treatment of unaccountability, along with the elevated status of glorified wrongdoer that all who serve their social hierarchy attain on becoming part of the club that feeds the greed of a few.

With this special power of harming others with impunity and being glorified for any wrongdoing, it’s not difficult to understand why these positions attract people who enjoy harming and having power over others. Even righting wrongs becomes a crime for less-thans, as more-thans monopolise revenge as well as all forms of justice.

Now, of course, there will be many that involve themselves with and even champion these superficial justice systems, who have all the good intent in the world, and some may even believe the hierarchal groups that they are serving do value rights over wrongs. We can all appreciate anyone with good intent trying to right wrongs, but they themselves are up against an industry that can swallow them up without much fuss if they try to right any wrongs that serve the interests of their hierarchy. As obedience is the best trait for recruits, doing what we are told, rather than questioning what we are told, allows lies to be valued. And just like any military force, there is not a lot of love for anyone within a domestic force who goes against a profitable narrative, especially when they are in the right.

As the main purpose of our self-glorifying wrongdoers’ laws is to protect the hierarchy and all their interests, such laws will always be valued by many who benefit the most from them, but not so much by those who are targeted by them. Despite our social hierarchies being the very definition of unjust and corrupt, we will always endure their lies to the contrary.

As their justice industries thrive on injustice and corruption, it always requires valuing many ignorances and lies to value such systems. Like all compulsive liars, our superficial justice systems play with words to convince their victims that their lies are worth valuing. With the aid of a parallel language in order to manipulate people into reducing their status from human to slave, or to the property of a corporation, their nonsense and deceit is valued by those who profit from it.

From Human to Fiction

In the magical code world of the legal society, legalese is the parallel language that is used to deceive people into contracts that only benefit those who make the code. So like most laws in that respect then. When it comes to today’s world, all countries have various systems of laws or codes in place with various levels of justness, but legalese helps to hide wrongs behind words. For many of our English-speaking social hierarchies, we still use common law (although not if our glorified wrongdoers have anything to do with it) and legal codes or legislation.

Common law uses the common language (English in this case) to give everyone a common footing in a court, in principle at least. Whereas legal codes use the language of legalese (designed to sound like common words but with very different meanings), which is used by those who understand this language to manipulate those who do not. This allows the simplicity of manipulating words to criminalize human behaviour. For example, a hunter becomes a poacher, a gatherer becomes a thief, a traveller becomes a driver or passenger, and a human becomes a civilian, illegal alien or any other legal fiction.

This makes dragging any man or woman from the rights bestowed upon them under the lawful world of common law, into the slave world of the legal system, as easy as using a magic word or two from the deceit-stained dictionary of legalese. This wordplay allows our glorified wrongdoers to treat their populations as their slaves, while maintaining the facade of justice by pretending to value just sounding laws. The legal system is fundamentally a contractual system that uses a collection of code laws (not human laws) like Civil, Cannon, Roman and Admiralty to name a few.

These systems of codes are designed to control trade and the wealth trade brings, by reducing everything into a contractible exchange. Slaves have always been a part of these contractual code systems, as they are a contractible product, and there is a good chance they always will be, as they are the main resource of any social hierarchy. We can sum up common law as the closest thing our hierarchies have to a system that governs right and wrong. But, of course, within any group that values differing worth, there is always differing rights and wrongs regarding identical acts. The legal system governs upholding and profiting from contracts, even if those contracts are unjust, forced upon, unlawful, or so obviously and completely wrong (as all slave contracts are, regardless of being bound by iron or debt), the legal system cares not a jot.

So how do our social hierarchies reduce their populations to debt slaves? We rarely hear a status seeker ask. Maybe because most are too obedient, but let’s embrace disobedience and attempt to answer the question. As hierarchal justice is an industry and a subject that is designed to be deceitful, it goes back a very long time (as new empires like to mirror the habits of old ones to add authority and legitimacy to their own) and is, of course, shrouded in nonsense in order to mask the true intent and actions of all involved. But as with most things, simple truths and questions can expose the essence of anything, so let’s try to simplify the whole nonsense.

The Cestui Que Vie Act was introduced in 1666 (yeah, yeah…all the devil nonsense) while many were too busy putting out fires to notice (a tactic used many times to ramp up oppression). The act was to subrogate (the old switcheroo) the rights of men and women in order to reduce their status from human beings (and outwith the protection of the common law) to the commercial property of the legal system. This, in effect, declared all men and women as dead or lost at sea, so there is no need to grant them any rights. Yep, we are all dead, apparently, and lost at sea according to these lovely folks. So, as we are all just populations of the dead, our living glorified wrongdoers can legally claim all that we own for themselves, as the dead don’t need rights, nor their own wealth or property.

Our slavemasters did this to move their populations’ lawful rights out of their reach and drag them into what they call admiralty law, which is basically a bunch of laws about promoting lawlessness and wrongdoing (or banking and merchant transactions, as some prefer to call it) at sea, and therefore does not adhere to the rights and laws of the land.

So basically, when we are on land, the laws and rights of that land apply (only if we are a living human), but if we are at sea (legally or physically), then the game’s a bogey, and we have no rights. This is just a long-winded legal way of saying if we are going to break the law (this is not an IF, but a WHEN for our social hierarchies), we should make sure we are at sea or in a legal system where the laws of the land don’t apply. Hence why our modern prolific wrongdoers use corporations to hide within the legal industry that encourages wrongdoing.

All of this land/sea nonsense held great value around the time our Europe’s empires were fighting over vast newfound resources and stealing them from one another at sea. So they are really just selling their wrongdoing at sea as somehow just, in the same way they do on land. When we go to court and are forced into the dock, we are all dead and at sea, thus our rights on the land mean nothing unless we know how to maintain them. Nothing at all dodgy about that then. Just as admiralty law required boats to have berth certificates in order to steal a portion of their commercial wealth, debt slaves are required to surrender and register their offspring as a commercial entity that becomes the property of our masters’ legal industry in the way of a birth certificate.

When we are born, our parents are pressured into registering us with the corporations that pass themselves off as the authority of the territory into which we find ourselves. It matters not what the name our hierarchy uses to sell itself as something more than a group of selfish wrongdoers, so let’s call our average “country” Slaveland, for example. This corporation, having the monopoly on violence, can be very persuasive in convincing people to do what they are told, so let’s not be too hard on our parents for signing us up for slavery. After all, their parents did the same to them.

Now, Slaveland creates birth certificates for each new human being born within their territory. This is like a receipt, or a branding for their property that can then be used in the same way people used their gold receipts as collateral to buy things with. Instead of a medium of exchange (MOE) based on the value of gold, our social hierarchies use the more valuable resource of human beings as the basis for borrowing from their central bank overlords. States with many debt slaves have more debt securities that allow larger loans, which they can use to pay for a lavish lifestyles. Today, our masters call their borrowing levers of worth state bonds, as our masters do like their slaves in bondage.

Once Slaveland have created their bonds, they can then trade them with their central bank or others. Thus, a degree of each state’s worth is backed by the debt slaves’ worth in the form of taxation, as well as other forms of fraud and exploitation Slaveland will bleed out of them. With our sockmaker encouraging states to borrow their way into vassal status, the endless borrowing creates an ever-growing national debt with the extortionate rates of interest on every loan. So Slaveland is obliged to increase taxation and fine their slaves for anything and everything in a futile attempt to reduce their debt to our sockmaker.

As their political systems are forced to focus on the short term, everyone grabs all they can within the window of time they have any power, and few care too much about the forever mounting debt, and arguably, few should, as it is all nonsense. So our sockmakers central banks can sit back and enjoy their total control over all who use their socks. With every government or country they control forced to use this method, their puppet hierarchies borrow more and more to ensure our sockmakers have ever-increasing leverage. This leverage is used to ensure no interference to their never-ending supply of labour and sex slaves that are required to fulfil their every desire.

Anyway, back to the birth certificate. This is a legal document that is used to force unwanted contracts onto people who have been registered to states by the fiction of their name. No one knowingly enters into these contracts, and by simply saying our name and date of birth, we are, in the eyes of these deceivers, re-presenting our status from a human being called Joe Blogs, who has rights and protection against wrongdoing in common law, to the lower status of a legal fiction called JOE BLOGS, who has no such rights or protection.

Capitalising our name is how the legal industry differentiate between our legal fiction and the human being, and by conditioning and pressuring their populations to identify with the legal fiction that was created for them in order to capitalise on their obedience, they ensure most play along with this gross injustice.

This makes stealing from and exploiting people as easy as sending a letter with their fictional name on it, or just getting people to say their name aloud. Remember, we are dead, so when we receive anything with our name in capitals, like the lettering on a tombstone, it is addressed to the dead us and not to the living human that has rights and protections under the law. By responding as the dead, we are re-presenting ourselves as this dead entity of cargo to be used by its owner in whatever manner they wish, so we reduce ourselves to their property. This is the level of nonsense we are dealing with that ensures our hierarchies can always exploit their populations, regardless of how many rights and laws are made to protect them from exploitation. Our modern-day slavemasters prefer to call themselves capitalists for a reason.

Slaveland attempts to deny their debt slave system by championing the perceived justness of common law with one breath, while selling their legal debt slave system as a system that rules by consent. By playing with the word consent, this apparently allows them to justify stealth slavery and continue the long traditions of human exploitation that all social hierarchies rely on. Let’s examine for a moment the legal industry’s idea of “consent”, and avoid eating during this because this nonsense is hilarious.

So within these systems, the social hierarchy sends out their glorified thieves and wrongdoers to go around demanding the names of any individuals they wish to target. Once an individual says their name, their status is automatically reduced from a human being to the legal fiction that is attached to their name. Enforcers are trained to get every human being they wish to harm and exploit to identify with the legal fiction that is their capitalised name. So the corporations that hire all these enforcers to go around harassing and harming people who have done no wrong, just have to convince people to share their name in order to adhere to their definition of consent.

In this wrongdoers’ paradise, stealing from people is as easy as asking them their name, as by the mere act of saying our name, we are giving consent to everything and anything those that own the name desire. At least according to these legal systems. If consent does not require any agreement or awareness to any act or contract, then every slave that ever lived has consented to their slavery, and everyone who has ever been wronged was wronged by consent the moment they shared their name. According to such nonsense.

Imagine rapists going around asking women their names and then proceed to rape those who give their name. Thus, by using the legal industry’s concept of consent, we could argue all of our rape victims gave consent. Although, given the stance on rape within our rape-friendly culture, there is a good chance that this is a given for many anyway. These are the laws of our glorified wrongdoers, so we should not expect much more than excuses and justifications for the acts they commit and inflict on their populations. It is also a good example of the futility of law-making under any social hierarchy, as even with all the struggles and efforts that many endure, and with others giving their lives for the opportunity to create just laws, even our attempts at timeless laws can all be ignored or eradicated in favour of more profitable and oppressive laws that feed the greed of the few.

Social hierarchies immerse their population into their propaganda industries from a very early age, in order to condition them to accept the role of a legal fiction. Their education systems drum home the language and ignorances required for the exploitation to succeed, as well as attempting to get their populations to identify themselves to Slaveland or whatever the hierarchy’s territorial fiction is called. Along with their education systems, hierarchies use their media and political systems to pressure their populations into adopting all the ignorances these exploitative systems champion.

As these populations are discouraged from distinguishing between right and wrong or ignorance and knowledge, most end up unwittingly valuing their diminished status in exchange for belonging. If anyone wants to steal from a man or a woman, then under common law, they would be breaking the law, but by reducing any man or woman to a legal fiction, then the legal system allows those who hide behind fictions to steal from people by forcing exploitative contracts onto them. That’s just one of the less brutal wrongs of stealing, but there is no wrong that a legal fiction will be spared, as they are in effect the property of another, and therefore theirs to do with what they wish. Slavery running parallel with the “rights” of some, dependent on status, is not a new concept, and one that will no doubt always be in use for as long as we have hierarchies.

As our modern social hierarchies use their legal systems to enrich themselves and their partners in crime, who also hide behind their corporate identities, it will always be profitable to declare human behaviour as illegal, even when not unlawful, so that the few can profit from human behaviour. The only people who should concern themselves with legalities are those who willingly enter into contracts that are totally transparent, but, of course, there is much less profit in transparency than there is in deceit. To do something unlawful would be to do something wrong, to do something illegal would by-in-large be to avoid feeding the greed of a few, hence why the remedy for anything illegal is usually money.

Fining people for being alive is an easy way to enrich ourselves if we get all to agree. Yet all fines for debt slaves are unlawful, as they have not knowingly entered into any contract to agree on paying any other party for anything. No meeting of minds and no full disclosure, just threats and violence are the only due process required. No human being, outwith any specified agreed contractual obligation, should ever worry about doing something illegal, as anything and everything has, is and probably will be at some point illegal. Going outside for a walk and taking a breath of fresh air while feeling the sun on our skin was illegal for most around the world not so long ago. This is the lunacy that comes of valuing differing worth. Thus, we get wrongdoers telling rightdoers that they are criminals, and must pay them when doing no wrong or be harmed.

The Crime of Being Human

Most human beings on the planet will do something illegal every day, yet those same people will have done no wrong. In the greedy eyes of our social hierarchies, declaring everything as illegal is just a control mechanism, and a very profitable control mechanism at that. This control is sold to other corporations that are owned by the more-than class in the form of legislation (code changes), as another source of income for our social hierarchies and interested parties. By offering a profitable change in these codes, both parties can take advantage of the exploitative system of debt slavery that is already established. So let’s say we create our own company where we produce robots that aid us in every way.

Once we have exhausted the wealthy market and begin to lower costs and prices to appeal to the mass market, we can imagine our product becomes a commonly used tool. Then, to increase our profits (as never-ending growth is somehow the marker of “success”), we can buy a change in legislation that would make it illegal for anyone to use our product without having a licence. Then, with the mass increase in profits from the licencing fee and fines rolling in year after year, we can become a hugely wealthy company.

With our vast wealth and subsequent power, we can buy further changes to these codes that could make it illegal for anyone to go outside without one of our robots to assist them, and we could sell this as a security concern with the safety of the population in mind. Now, if people want to leave the security of their own homes, they must buy our product or face a diminished existence. Well, that is if people still have the right to have a home by the time we all have robot assistants.

All of this may sound ridiculous to many, but this is the very type of nonsense most people are exposed to day-in-day-out when it comes to our legal systems. We are already pressured to pay for documents to use our own property and travel from A to B. Having more than one set of laws that contradict one another allows our social hierarchies to avoid accountability in one set by using the other, while at the same time dragging their victims from one set to another in order to exploit them.

With common law governing right and wrong and the legal system governing contracts, in essence, if we do no wrong under common law, then we don’t go to jail (in theory anyway), but if we do no wrong under the legal system, we pay a fine and/or go to jail. So if we do nothing at all, common law will have no problem with our actions, but the legal industry will. Thus, we can understand why our glorified wrongdoers prefer the fluidity of the legal world to the rigidity of the lawful world when it comes to their practice of human exploitation.

So we have the law industry and the legal industry to “help” us regulate how we should interact with one another, and it could arguably be very efficient at achieving this, but remember, we are dealing with social hierarchies, so inefficiency reigns in order to serve the greed of the few. The law should be the law, that is to say, a set of rules that apply to everyone regardless of status or wealth, but, of course, this very basic principle is impossible within any culture that values differing worth.

The basics of do no harm, with robbery, assault, rape and murder being the main wrongs we all want to avoid experiencing, holds little worth as all of these wrongs are glorified by our social hierarchies that commit them on a regular basis. Knowing the difference between right and wrong can become blurred to anyone who values the ignorances hierarchies rely on.

As social hierarchies use language in an attempt to mask their wrongdoing from those unable to recognise identical acts, within such minds, their overlords never steal, they seize. They never bribe, they lobby. They never defraud, they adhere to procedure. They never blackmail, they make offers. They never harass, they make inquiries. They never kidnap, they apprehend. They never hold hostage, they imprison. They never torture, they rehabilitate. They never sexually assault, they perform strip searches, or adhere to protocol. They never assault, they defend themselves. They never murder, they have unfortunate incidents, and, of course, they never rape, never, honestly. Nope! Never, well…apparently. OK, maybe only on very rare occasions by a “bad apple” that may have eluded justice for decades (as is the norm for our glorified wrongdoers), but apart from that, no rapes to see here. Honestly.

As mentioned previously, rape is one of the few wrongs all social hierarchies engage in that they can struggle to glorify, but that’s not to say they have not tried. As rape is difficult (not impossible) to glorify to even the most ignorant of populations that accept and glorify almost every other wrong, our social hierarchies focus on vilifying and demonizing their rape victims in order to maintain their rape-friendly cultures. To glorify and justify a wrong, many wrongdoers demonisethe victims of their wrongs using their pseudo-morality, or the good guy/bad guy ignorance. To steal property from others can become the good guys taking from the bad guys, or even more ridiculous is the idea of liberating property.

One of the most hilarious terms that is used by our dealers in nonsense is declaring their glorious thieves as custodians of a property, human or otherwise. To assault others can become the good guys restraining the bad guys, and to murder others can become the good guys stopping the bad guys. The less aware will find these perceptions more than acceptable, as long as they buy into the lie that they and their hierarchy are the good guys even when engaging in wrongdoing.

Every population inflicted with a social hierarchy will be conditioned to believe their masters are the good guys, despite all the evidence that proves otherwise. However, no matter how hard they try, it is difficult to sell the idea that the good guys raped the bad guys (especially when their bad guys are children), while maintaining the delusion of moral superiority over the bad guys. Maybe one day all of our rape-friendly cultures will find a way to make rape a widespread glorious act, like every other wrong. Although, as most are ignorant of their hierarchy’s practices, many already engage in the hero-worshipping of our most prolific rapists and paedophiles.

When the legal society force their one-sided contracts onto people in order to exploit them, those who are not too keen on being exploited are kidnapped, assaulted and imprisoned. This often results in families being broken up and children being put into “care”, causing the desired stress and anxiety to be inflicted on the less obedient. This is to encourage obedience within their populations to the greed of the few.

With many even losing their lives simply for doing no wrong and causing no harm, it may be a wonder why so many come to value this daily mistreatment of their communities, but we could argue that real communities where people care for and look out for one another are wiped out as soon as any social hierarchy is established. As our cultures of greed reduce our communities to glorified groups of sycophants, who are concerned with the delusions of differing worth in the forms of image, reputation, wealth and status, to name a few, the practices of compassion and understanding get little exercise.

Imagine if an openly profit-based corporation treated people in the same way, by harassing them in their homes and demanding them to pay them for the pleasure of using their own property. Well, no need to imagine when we have corporations doing exactly that and subjecting many to the mercy of the great wrongdoers of the legal society. With the corrupt political systems all social hierarchies require to flourish, where any industry can buy a law or code that will generate them great wealth by pressuring and deceiving people into contracts that make it illegal to live or use their own property, without paying a glorified few for the privilege, they get to criminalize a huge percentage of their populations who have done no wrong whatsoever. So, when is our property, our property? Well, it’s all just playing with words and sounds, so as humans we have property rights, but as a legal fiction we have none, as slaves cannot own property.

The legal industry has its roots in the Greek and Roman eras, which is why they still like to use terms and words from those times in an attempt to give their authority some kind of greater legitimacy or legacy. It began from people exploiting the ignorances of those who knew little about the laws of their group in return for a payment, so not much has changed there then. We did get a golden age that was largely free from the legal industry for a few hundred years that has been labelled as the dark ages. Most likely due to the fact that the legal society didn’t have any great control or influence over much of Europe in those centuries, as “justice” was a more local affair than a central power that dictated to others as we have today. A dark time indeed for human exploitation.

This period must have been a hard time from the perspective of our glorified wrongdoers legal nonsense, as their ability to steal from Europe’s populations on mass would have been diminished without their corrupted minions in every court. If this age were summed up by those free from exploitation rather than those who profit from it, they may have called it the light ages, as they were free from the darkness of mass wrongdoing committed by those who hide behind the legal industry.

Just as social hierarchies overvalue themselves in order to devalue others, they do the same with time periods, among other things. Perhaps the darkness could refer to the lack of literature to survive the period, because when it comes to the legal world, if it is not written down, then it did not happen. A very convenient philosophy for our wrongdoers, aiding the literate to exploit the illiterate, while maintaining their perception of honour.

The legal world only exists on paper, and to harm humans, they must reduce the status of a human to a thing in order to maintain what passes as honour in their minds. So let’s touch on some of the nonsense of word play, doublespeak and other forms of deceit that are used to maintain their perceptions of honour. They use terms like “capitis diminutio”, which, when translated from Latin means head decrease, but in effect means to decapitate the man who has rights and reduce them to a slave who has none. This is why “i” refers to a human and “I” a thing, as the small “i” still has a head (yep, all very pathetic). So capitalists now teach their slaves to us the I and never i.

Capitis, as well as having links to decapitate, is also linked to capitalise, meaning to take advantage of, which is what the legal industry does to every human’s name in order to reduce their status from human to legal fiction. Hence why they always address their contracts of deceit to humans under the legal fiction name that uses capital letters, because they are attempting to capitalise on humans misunderstanding their code world in order to strip them of their wealth. Diminutio with an additional n is diminution, meaning the process of diminishing, lessening or reducing the status of a human.

An earlier definition of diminucioun, meaning the extenuation of sin, pretty much sums up how the legal industry treats humans. Now we won’t go into every word, term or phrase the legal industry uses to exploit people, as life is way too short and beautiful to spend it immersed in the silly nonsense they use to justify their wrongdoings. This is just one or two of the countless examples of how the people who hide behind the legal industries exploit language to enrich themselves, and shows the level of contempt for human beings this industry has always had throughout its history, and always will within cultures that value differing worth.

The legalese language is the language that is used by our social hierarchies to mislead their populations, and has run parallel with the English language for a few generations now. By using the same words that have two different meanings under these two languages, along with other words, phrases and terms that are foreign to an English speaker, we can understand the wide scope for manipulation this system allows. Let’s take the common automobile for example. Now under common law, all have the right to own property, and as far as owning an automobile is concerned, all are entitled to travel in their own property free from harassment.

As the legal industry are supposed to only regulate contracts, people (or men and women) who use their automobiles should be free from the legal society’s claws, as they have no contract in place. The legal industry regulate commercial automobiles and those who operate them in order to ensure a standard of competence within those industries. Therefore, commercial automobiles are called motor vehicles, and their operators are called drivers (not men or women) in order to distinguish them from non-commercial users. All very lovely and reasonable so far, but in order to steal from a larger group of people, the legal industry needs to drag people from the non-commercial common law into their realm of deceit that is forced commerce. So in steps the debt slave system.

By simply using the slave name to reduce people’s status, and by rebranding the actions of a human being into a term of contract, in the form of a traveller to a driver, and their automobiles to motor vehicles, the legal industry can massively increase their wealth and any hierarchy’s profits, as there are vastly more non-commercial automobiles in use than commercial motor vehicles. Car manufacturers and sellers are used to snare their victims by reducing their buyers’ status from owners to registered keepers to facilitate the fraud.

Instead of people buying cheap public liability insurance, they are misled into buying the vastly more expensive commercial drivers’ insurance that can be more than ten times as much, if not more, not to mention the endless ability to fine those dragged into the legal world. More and more codes are made up to extort as much as they can from people, even fines for having air fresheners within your own property is deemed a crime, dependent on your social status, of course. So even although no one agreed to or signed a contract to be a driver to transport people or goods for financial gain, they are treated as if they have, and certainly receive no gain or wages from these phantom commercial activities. Void of any disclosure, never mind full disclosure, these types of enforced contracts are used by our glorified wrongdoers to justify their frauds.

This fraud is unlawful and avoidable for those that can stay on the side of common law, but few fall into that category, as every institution under a social hierarchy will encourage their populations to feed the greed they all profit from. Stealing the property of those less compliant with these frauds is also a great moneymaker, even though all property is supposed to be returned to any so-called accused, but it’s always one rule for some and another rule for others within such groups.

After these fraudulent cases are concluded, these so-called public servants are supposed to return any property they may have “seized” in any case. But, of course, this would limit profits, so it rarely happens without going through a very precise protocol that is kept from the public for obvious reasons. “Return property” within the common law side of a court, maybe the magic words they need to hear in the magic forum they need to hear it, before they even consider any kind of human decency, but, of course, they only need to incite a few magic words or actions to drag living humans back into their dead slave world, and all within these “justice” industries are trained to do just that.

Criminalising people for being human or using their own property will always be vastly profitable, so it is unlikely we see an end to it any time soon, as the lunacy of these practices will always be justifiable to the ignorant who value differing worth. Let’s try to examine this further in order to really appreciate the level of ignorances that are required to instil in any population to make them accept such nonsense. We shall take the example of our masters wanting their slaves to pay for their propaganda in the form of a TV licence, with the addition of fines for the privilege of using their own property.

Now, to live in a world where people are put into prison for using their own TV in their own homes, may sound perfectly reasonable to those enriching themselves from such frauds, but this is an example of how easy it is to condition many slaves into believing a right is wrong and a wrong is right when refusing to comply with such obvious wrongdoing is deemed as a crime. This particular wrong is, of course, sold by our glorified wrongdoers as fair and just, and as they lavish in wealth and status, many that commit the heinous act of watching their own TV in their own homes without a bit of paper that says they are obedient and valued slaves, are sold as criminals and terrorised by all involved in the fraud.

Where will this type of fraud end? What if we had to pay for a licence to use our own shoes, and were fined or imprisoned if we didn’t use the right shoes for the right occasion. A licence to use our own bed, and fined or imprisoned if we overuse it. A licence to use our own toothbrush, and fined or imprisoned if we don’t use it enough. Once our own property is no longer ours, we may need a licence to use our own feet, and be fined or imprisoned for not taking enough steps or taking too many steps.

A licence to use our own voices, and fined or imprisoned if we don’t repeat enough lies or speak too many truths. All this may sound crazy to many, but no less crazy than any other trespasses on our rights that many already accept and experience every day. To have a few glorified people dictate to grown adults what they can and cannot do, especially when they are harming no one, is a pile of nonsense. But as long as that nonsense is backed by a monopoly on violence and rewards those involved, it will always be valued by many.

As police can steal anything from anyone (largely subject to status and knowledge of the law) in order to enrich themselves (or to pay for their bonuses, equipment, works parties…etc.) by merely declaring their victims as “suspicious”, we can see just how profitable it can be to go around accusing innocent people of being suspicious. When the police are stealing more from their populations than all the demonised thieves within that population, we can get a sense of the sheer scale of this glorified thievery. The police just have a better PR team than less-than thieves, as well as a justice system that only punishes their competition. As most are unable or unaware of how to hold these thieves accountable and pursue a “Return property” case under common law against their glorified wrongdoers, this practice will continue to blight our populations.

Social hierarchies have a habit of staging everything in an attempt to mask their deceit. Their overly orchestrated performances and their willing performers of deception are always on display, ready and willing to champion their glorified wrongdoers, and their courts of injustice are no different. Violence is always the main controlling lever for social hierarchies to control their slaves, regardless of how it may be dressed up within their contrived laws and justice systems. Hierarchies can’t rely on reason or logic, and the truth must be avoided at all costs, but, of course, the deluded and the ignorant may see reason in harming many, so a few can live like the gods they invent.

The debt slave system may, on the surface, appear less violent than its traditional form, but the violence is just more subtle and hidden behind cloaks of respectability and veiled threats, that attempt to justify human exploitation. Our hierarchal justice systems sell assault, sexual assault, hunger, food poisoning, dehydration, sleep deprivation and uncomfortable temperatures as just some of the basic “humane” abuses that are acceptable ways to treat those who lack the social status to commit a crime (real or imaginary) with impunity, or those who fail to serve the interests of the few.

Even when drinks or anything that is defined as food are available, it is not uncommon for them to be seasoned with bodily fluids and other things that do our health no favours, as we would expect from groups that celebrate their ignorances and malicious nature. The unnecessarily cruel nature of our social hierarchies prison systems are a mere reflection of the level of malice and vindictiveness that our glorified wrongdoers possess in abundance. Denying people access to fresh air and vitamin D from the sun, while feeding them a diet of harmful and nutritionally barren foods, could be argued as punishment enough for most crimes, without the abuses their enforcers are encouraged to carry out in order to satisfy their more-than delusions. Yet many enforcers go above and beyond the malice they are paid to engage in.

The practice of subjecting people to the exact same punishment (with only the variant of time exposure) regardless of the crime or imaginary crime has nothing to do with justice and more to do with oppression. While many may champion the fact that a mass murderer and someone who has never harmed anyone or done any wrong are given the same form of punishment, it is a practice that can only exist within groups that are tremendously ignorant and controlled. So obviously ideal for a social hierarchy.

Our glorified wrongdoers and their minions can always rely on diminished responsibility to justify their wrongdoing using the chain of command system that encourages individuals to surrender any sense of right and wrong, in favour of obeying those declared as more-than. This allows the participants of wrongdoing to absolve themselves from any personal responsibility for the acts they engage in. Although most prisons are designed with the level of malice that all social hierarchies share, there are many luxury prisons for those who do not have the right level of connections to avoid prison, but do have the right level of wealth to avoid the overly malicious treatments dished out in most standard prisons. Who said crime doesn’t pay?

Protected from Freedom

Within our social hierarchies, laws are not to prevent wrongdoing. Wrongdoing is the law, and our social status determines our actions as right or wrong, regardless of the act. Common law may have been an attempt to treat all equally under the law, despite the inevitability of failure within a culture of differing worth, but the legal industry is blatantly used to ensure gross inequality under their codes for sale that masquerade as laws. If common law had any worth, it should be common knowledge, but our hierarchies’ education systems ensure their slave classes know little of how to keep their masters’ greed at bay. As the wrongdoing industry is big business that few other industries can come close to matching, human beings killing millions of human beings is all just good business.

In a world where everything is reduced to a corporate entity, and a lie written has more valued than a truth spoken, right and wrong holds little worth. Our glorified injustice systems ensure paper and ink are the modern-day weapons of choice for those who lack the nerve to face those they conspire to harm. Our glorified wrongdoers can even be on the other side of the world, tucked up in their beds, as their victims are violated under their warped banners of justice. By using their monopoly on language, our glorified wrongdoers now sell traditional slavery as a bad form of human exploitation, and debt slavery/employees as a good form of human exploitation, even though the practices are in effect identical. When enduring those who value fictions and declarations of representing fictions, it is wise to assume a load of nonsense is about to befall us.

The legal industry is full of professional complainers who make and file complaints about their victims in order to steal from or harm them, even when they have done no wrong. Whereas in common law, when someone has been wronged, they accuse their wrongdoers, so they are called accusers. A police constable is supposed to uphold the common law and deal with accusers, while a police officer upholds legal codes and deals with complainers to enrich the corporations that buy codes from a state’s rulers, in the form of legislation or statutes. However, by allowing the same individuals to magically represent both of these roles or fictions at the same time, hierarchal policing can exploit their victims with ease by floating between the two in order to legitimise their extortions.

If a population understood that police officers are attempting to defraud people by entrapping them into one-sided contracts, and police constables are (in theory at least) there to uphold just laws that protect all equally, then perhaps they would demand that officers are separate and distinguishable from constables, so that they could be free to refuse contracting with the more deceiving fraudster officers, without them exploiting their dual position as a constable to coerce their victims into such contracts. But where is the profit in that? Exploitation is to social hierarchies as water is to fish, so their laws will always be riddled with this type of nonsense in order to achieve their goals of elevated worth.

By eliminating informed consent and using the glorified enslaving system of capitalism, social hierarchies can use their multi-purpose enforcers to reduce the human beings they wish to exploit into a fiction (the capitalised name). As these deceitful enforcers are paid to reduce us to the property of their hierarchy so we can be used in any manner our malicious overlords wish, gross deceit is a must. At least in the traditional slave system, our social hierarchies were somewhat more honest about using people as slaves. But with the benefit of a few more lies, a lot of deceit and the comparison to traditional slavery to fall back on, today's hierarchies can convince many of their slaves that they are free and not slaves being used to feed the greed of a few.

One wrong affects many, so in our cultures that celebrate wrongdoing, few of us go unaffected by the endless onslaught of wrongs. The practice all social hierarchies use in treating those who do no harm as criminals, while treating those who do much harm as heroes, inevitably causes huge ripple effects throughout the populations they infect. With our glorified wrongdoers’ victims automatically labelled as the bad guys or criminals, especially if their victims are addressing their hierarchy’s wrongdoings, many are susceptible to championing wrongdoing in order to avoid such labels. Our hierarchal justice systems are so bad that many less-thans have no choice but to seek their own forms of justice. This is, of course, belittled by glorified wrongdoers as “vigilante justice”, yet it is no different from any social hierarchy’s glorified versions. They are both susceptible to lies and the liars who are plentiful within all groups that suffer from differing worth.

The narratives on organised crime within our hierarchies are always worth a giggle. Listening to the high-status organised criminals that are social hierarchies, pretending to care about the wrongs and victims of low-status organised criminals, is impossible to take seriously without ignorance or fear. As wrongdoing is a practice that is encouraged by our glorified wrongdoers, it is always hypocritical for social hierarchies to complain about crime when those they brand as criminals are merely emulating their behaviours. But it’s no easy task trying to get through a day without having to endure a hypocrite or two hundred, within our cultures of differing worth.

All social hierarchies work hand in hand with their organised criminal groups, as they are just the demonised wrongdoers of our social hierarchies’ glorified wrongdoers. As they have much in common, working together aids both sides in the business of human exploitation, with the added benefit of the glorified wrongdoers being able to blame the demonised wrongdoers for any wrongs that become too exposed to their obedient slave classes. Convincing the more suggestible that those who are granted elevated worth are somehow worth trusting is important to every hierarchy in selling themselves as anything more than the organised criminal groups that they are.

The illegal drug industry is often perceived as the domain of our demonised organised crime groups, but that would be to discredit our glorified ones, as so-called illegal drugs are primarily used to pacify and criminalize the slave classes. Leaving aside the fact that legal drugs harm and kill far more people than illegal ones, the illegal drug industry enriches many of our hierarchies in more ways than one. Even the use of illegal drugs comes with differing perceptions, based on the ignorance of differing worth. The rich junkie/poor junkie phenomenon that persists within our hierarchal societies, makes all the difference when it comes to the perception of crime or non-crime.

Less-thans are always criminalized within groups that champion gross inequality, therefore, the actions of more-than individuals will always be more acceptable, while the same actions of less-thans are criminalized. Poor junkies can be used to fill prison labour camps, while rich junkies are sold as in need of help but remain fine members of society. A criminal society, yes, but a society nevertheless. A less-than drug dealer may be labelled a crime lord, while a more-than drug dealer is labelled a doctor or pharmaceutical salesperson, but the main difference is that the glorified ones usually pay “official” taxes to the hierarchy that monopolises social status, while the demonised ones usually do not and dabble in bribes instead. So in effect the same thing.

It is always hilarious how our glorified wrongdoers and their minions report on crime with their grossly hypocritical twist on every narrative. Constantly demonizing the crimes of their slaves and enemies, as they desperately try to elevate their crimes to the same level as the elevated worth they decree upon themselves, always fools many. So we endure the farce of high-status fraudsters telling their victims to be wary of low-status fraudsters, as having our wealth stolen from us is apparently much more acceptable when the thieves have high-status.

Robbing from an individual can lead to a prison sentence or worse, but with say a pension fund, charity, banking or business licence, we can rob from millions of people and be heralded as valued members of that society, with immunity from accountability. Thus, crime is always more acceptable when we harm a greater number of people. The same applies to any crime, as high-status abusers, rapists and murderers all hold great value in our grossly unjust societies that portray them as the “good guys”, while low-status thieves, abusers, rapists and murderers are heralded as the “bad guys” within the pantomimes our social hierarchal dominated groups’ versions of justice.

When the bad guys are the good guys and the good guys are the bad guys, the orgy of wrongdoing never ends, but that’s social hierarchies for you. If we do away with the concept of good guys and bad guys (never going to happen with so many wrongdoers needing to glorify their wrongs) and just have guys, then the more susceptible among us may be able to judge more accurately the right or wrong of any act, when void of the factitious identities attached to any glorified or demonised individual or group. Whatever lies we need to repeat or tell in order to justify harming others that do us no wrong, they tend to spawn more and more lies. Addressing the lies of any social hierarchy is like trying to catch all the water from a ferocious waterfall in one bucket. The lies just don’t stop coming, and the volume can overwhelm those that attempt to examine the torrent of lies that flow from our glorified wrongdoers.

Speaking of a torrent of lies, our hierarchies media platforms are always mired in the lies that their hierarchy/sockmaker instructs them to repeat. Monopolising these mediums of information allows our glorified wrongdoers to sell every one of their wrongs as righteous, and any righteous act to right the wrongs they inflict, as wrongs. Journalism is always a crime within social hierarchies. Well, journalism that is free to report the truth, rather than the pseudo-journalism of orchestrated performers that aid their glorified wrongdoers. The vast majority of those that are sold as journalists within a culture of differing worth are just more of their hierarchy’s propagandists.

When journalists who share the truth are routinely harmed, imprisoned and murdered, we should not be too surprised to find most within such an industry are grossly lacking in any integrity. For most, it is better to be a living propagandist than a dead journalist, yet there are always those willing to risk their lives for the truth. Liars and idiots can gain great worth within this industry, just like the other lying industries. Those that masquerade as journalists to sell the lies they are told to, are either too scared to risk their wealth and status for the truth or are ignorant of it. Either way, they are rarely worth listening to.

As status seekers rely on appearance more than reality, when snared in any trial, dressing to the standards of those deemed as more-than can be enough to convince many of innocence within these justice systems. While dressing like less-thans can be enough proof of guilt for many sufferers of differing worth, regardless of the truth. Even attractiveness plays a role in our ability to avoid accountability for a crime, so ugly, poor people are always at a huge disadvantage to attractive, rich people within any of our hierarchal kangaroo courts.

Less-than groups, like those driven into poverty, are often declared as responsible for having the highest crime rates within social hierarchies. This lie is usually valued by the more-thans and those aspiring to belong to such groups. Yet even in the most crime-reddened part of the world (as defined by our glorified wrongdoers), the crimes committed by less-thans are always dwarfed by the crimes committed by more-thans. However, in order to sell the lie, crimes committed by more-thans are dressed up in just sounding laws or glorified in some way, while normal human behaviour is criminalized for those within the less-than groups.

This way, every master’s crime is just, and every slave’s existence is a crime. Our social hierarchies like to use “crime figures” (bear in mind that doing no wrong can always be interpreted as a crime in such cultures) to tally up the reported crimes that they have taken seriously within a territory, in order to use it as a political tool to serve their interests. But as they never count the vast array of crimes they themselves commit in these figures, they are merely an indication of the level of obedience among their slave classes. If they were to include their own crimes in such “crime figures”, then even their most crime riddled areas would pale in significance to the colossal number of crimes any hierarchy inflicts upon others.

Terrorism is another pile of nonsense. It may be sold as something only less-thans are capable of, by those who declare their own acts of terror as glorious and righteous, but our hierarchies merely use such a term as an excuse to vilify their victims while ironically glorifying the terror they inflict upon them. By branding anyone that challenges their wrongdoing as a terrorist and having such ridiculous concepts as anti-terrorism laws, which basically attempt to justify imprisoning anyone indefinitely without any evidence of a crime, or even any need to conjure up fake evidence, hierarchies can openly ignore their own laws to persecute anyone they wish without much concern from their slave classes that value the lies they are fed.

These laws are also used as some kind of justification for our glorified wrongdoers to install spyware in every common device they can, in order to circumvent their own laws to violate the privacy of all. Anyone that protests against more-thans polluting their environment can be branded as an eco-terrorist, or a political terrorist for protesting against the tyranny of a hierarchy, or a cyber-terrorist for using the internet to share a truth or a state-terrorist if we avoid feeding the greed of the few in any way. Needless to say, anyone that does not bow to the greed of a glorified few runs the risk of being labelled a terrorist of some kind (by real terrorists) in order to discourage people from being righteous in any way.

Glorified wrongdoers have always persecuted anyone that displeases them, and have always ignored their own laws to take advantage of their immunity from accountability. The whole terrorism nonsense is just the latest fashion in glorifying wrongdoing. Many of our glorified wrongdoers have a list of designated “terrorist groups” (often puppet players that are used to sell the idea of good guy/bad guy), and they even have a global terrorism index that is, of course, always deafeningly silent on the terrors they themselves inflict upon others, as well as other equally laughable attempts to define their gross wrongful acts as something to value, while demonising anyone attempting to right those wrongs. Anti-terrorism laws and rhetoric coming from our most prolific terrorists are basically conveying the standard “do as I say, not as I do” nonsense that all glorified wrongdoers encourage their slaves to value.

Death and taxes may be sold as certainties of life by our glorified wrongdoers, but throughout most of human history, taxes would have been of no concern to anyone. The taxation fraud our hierarchies use to ensure they can steal any amount from anyone they wish, in order to ensure few individuals or groups gain a degree of self-sufficiency, is sold as some kind of social enterprise for the benefit of a population, instead of being recognised as a system of perpetual theft of hard-earned wealth from their low-status slaves, who must always have so little, that they are forced to do the bidding of those who steal their wealth. The victims of this mass thievery, as well as the many other forms, are labelled as the lower or aspiring class (poor), while those who avoid it are called the upper class (rich), but if the rich were robbed as much as the poor, they too would be poor.

Our hierarchal tax system is just another glorified wrong that is sold as a necessity by glorified wrongdoers, with the aim to enrich the few and punishing the existence of their slaves. Income tax is the punishment for effort, inheritance tax is the punishment for a lifetime of effort and property tax is the punishment for investing in or building our own homes, to name but a few.

Taxation is just a glorified protection racket that offers its victims to pay their abusers for not harming them. Again, our glorified tax criminals just have a better PR team than our demonised criminals. Taxation’s predecessor of tribute formed the same practice of forced obedience, and to this day tribute is something to be paid rather than given. Only liars, idiots and those that can’t recognise wrongdoing, proclaim crime doesn’t pay.

Consuming the Innocent

Among the many wrongs committed by our social hierarchies, one of the cruellest is to steal the children of those they have decided are of low enough worth to feed their desires. For those who have the luxury of only having to imagine this nightmare, think about the reasons why often armed men force their way into the homes of people who have committed no wrong, in order to take their children from them.

Now, of course, there are cases of neglect and harm towards children, and no one would argue against protecting children, but we are not referring to such cases here. Anyone can appreciate the difficulty of assessing a child at risk from their own family, but there are many cases where there is no such risk, yet children are kept from their families for months and even years. There are industries that make huge profits from stealing children from loving families, and as long as such actions provide a flow of profits, our status seekers will continue the practice.

Poverty, personal vendettas, greed and other base desires, or just the desire to have nothing to do with our glorified wrongdoers, can be enough of an excuse for the malicious individuals within these industries to take children from their families. So-called charities, religious groups, government agencies and the legal industries all profit from breaking up families without a care for the damage they do. Even when it is obvious to anyone that no child is at any risk from their family, the desire to serve their own interests above the interests of low-valued children can be enough for many to continue the torture. And these acts won’t be cited in their terrorist reports.

Pretending to care for children is always used as an excuse for terrorising families. In fact, many are aware that child abuse is a common practice experienced by children in the “care” of a social hierarchy, as it is just another wrong our glorified wrongdoers know they can commit void of consequences. Every social hierarchy abuses children, and their slaves accept it. This is just one of the costs of elevating the worth of wrongdoers.

By keeping children from parents and forcing parents to jump through their never-ending legal hoops, with the “promise” of returning their children to them, the legal industry and connecting industries can ensure a customer base for years. The ignorances and malice that is required to do these things to our most vulnerable shows just how easy it is for us to accept and drag out the cruellest of wrongs, using wealth and status to convince all involved in these acts to commit such wrongs against those we should protect the most.

The magical term of “return property“ done in the magical way that cuts through our commercial child abusers nonsense, can be used in their kangaroo courts in order for our children to be free from these champions of wrongdoing, but again, few who have their children stolen are made aware of their nonsense. Even a parent calling their children their property is deemed inappropriated, not because it suggests the child is a slave to the parent (although our glorified wrongdoers will sell it that way), but because under common law, human beings (or a man and a woman….more word play) have the right to own their own property, but the legal system owns or has jurisdiction over the term child or children, so this is why they pressure parents to use their legalese terms to feed their child abuse industries.

Parents are the ones who create their own offspring. No state, no god, no commercial entity or legal fiction creates a human being. So all children are the property of their parents, even if the term children is monopolised by the legal industry. Our social hierarchies do love to insert the fiction of a god into their justice systems, and why not, as what is one more fiction on the mountain of fictions that is their justice systems? Fictions can be exploited to be whatever we want them to be, so if parents can be convinced that a fiction created their children, then they become easier to exploit, as all gods (and other fictions) are the property of a social hierarchy. Stealing children from their parents on mass is a common practice for many social hierarchies, especially when they are trying to exert their authority upon a new population.

By committing these wrongs, it can be easier to eradicate an existing culture and stop a whole generation of slaves from valuing their heritage, and instead adopt their new master’s lies. Without our parents to guide us, we are open to abuse and manipulation from social hierarchies and their cheerleaders.

So by conditioning the children of a conquered people to value their lies, a social hierarchy can avoid the disgruntled slave population stage and ensure an easier transition to a more obedient slave population. Parentless children, as well as being good targets for abuse, as they have no family who will ask uncomfortable questions of their hierarchy or their minions, also make good obedient cannon fodder for the same reason.

Breaking a law that harms others is a totally different thing from disobeying the company policies or codes of our social hierarchies’ corporations. We will always be disobeying these codes as the nature of these codes are anti-human, and so always facilitate this perverse justification for exploitation. So if disobeying a code justifies punishing and imprisoning people, and using plants is disobeying a code, then we will always be criminals, as humans will always use plants. If going from A to B is disobeying a code, then we will always be criminals, as humans will always go from A to B. If using our own property is disobeying a code, then again we will always be criminals, as humans will always use what is theirs.

Having a family, speaking our native language, our level of melanin, our sex, gathering, walking, talking, speaking the truth, and even protecting ourselves and our families, all disobey the codes of some corporate entity at some time and place. There are endless amounts of ridiculous anti-human codes or laws that only those who lay down and die could hope to avoid, and, of course, even suicide is against their laws, so even this act is somehow criminalized. Except when “suicide” is used to cover up our glorified wrongdoers’ murders that is.

Another wonderful joke we get from our glorified wrongdoers is their anti-corruption laws. Social hierarchies declaring they are against corruption is akin to politicians saying they are against lying, or bankers saying they are against fraud. The nature of the beast remains obvious, no matter how much it condemns its own characteristics.

Our justice industries are like any other hierarchal industry in that they are only concerned with profits and the elevated status that goes with it. Anyone who makes the mistake of believing they exist to uphold justice or right wrongs only needs to be on the receiving end of their hierarchy’s wrongdoing to know better.

Now, of course, they will right some wrongs, mostly wrongs committed by those of low social status, but nevertheless, this is often enough to sell the idea of a righteous justice system to many. However, as justice is mainly for those who can afford it within our cultures of greed, it is easy to see through this thin veil of pseudo-righteousness to witness the level of corruption that governs these justice industries, just as it governs every other industry under a social hierarchy.

Even though many of those involved in our unjust justice systems may have good intent, we must remember that within our cultures of greed, status seekers will always be encouraged to put their quest for status above much else. So we get many from every level of our justice systems, whether they are public prosecutors, police, judges, lawyers, administrators…etc., who put their own self-interests and careers above any sense of right and wrong, regardless of any moral intent. We must also bear in mind that many status seekers have a habit of being rather petty, malicious and vindictive, especially when they attach their personal identity to their position and status. This inevitably leads to many pursuing personal goals rather than any form of justice.

Many within these industries are well-paid individuals who gain more wealth and status, not for getting to the truth or executing justice, but for having a high conviction rate, regardless of how that is achieved. It is a fractured system that creates many cracks in order to allow those deemed special enough to slip through to avoid accountability, while trapping those who have done no wrong. However, anything that is created by wrongdoers is always going to assist wrongdoers, so these cracks will always exist for them to exploit.

The money to be made at every level of these justice systems makes criminalising innocent people a must in a culture where all are defined by how many socks they have accumulated. By using these industries to strip populations of their wealth and property, the balance of differing worth that these cultures value can be maintained and controlled.

Most people within any large group will do little to no real wrong in their lives (definitions may vary), so by making everything a crime, our social hierarchies can exert their control and will onto innocent people who would otherwise be exempt from their justice system’s exploitation, if we were to believe these cultures cared for justice, that is.

Punish for Profit

The accumulation of prisoners can be very profitable to our glorified wrongdoers and can create huge profit margins for the industries involved in the justice process, as well as connected industries. Profits abound not only in the creation of prisoners but in the exploitation of prisoners with enforced labour, or the token attempt to justify slave labour by paying a tiny percentage of a pittance to prisoners, in order to uphold the superficial morality our social hierarchies love to engage in to win public support for their wrongdoing (backed by the threat of violence, of course).

As prisoners are often treated as having among the lowest status of all in society, this is more than enough for many to excuse slave labour, and so encourage many industries to take advantage of this vastly cheaper labour force. This practice encourages and incentivises the imprisonment of larger numbers of a population, and with the level of propaganda all social hierarchies thrive on, this practice is valued by many. As if being imprisoned for doing no wrong and receiving the same form of punishment as those who commit some of the worst things we do to each other was not bad enough, but having to then be made to work for free, takes us from debt slave to traditional slave, if we discount the token pittance payments made to sell the illusion of morality.

Forced labour is not exactly new and is the defining feature of hierarchal civilization. Thus, this practice will always attach itself to differing worth, making this just one of the delights in store for many prisoners. The usual abuses and torture that the ignorant call rehabilitation are always on offer, not to mention the conditions we inflict on prisoners that many would not inflict upon any animal. As our modern-day hierarchies are so entwined with lies and offended by basic truths, they no longer call their torture dungeons, torture dungeons. Instead, prisons or the farcical terms of correction and rehabilitation facilities sound nicer to our tyrant’s supporters’ ears.

The conditions and treatments prisoners are made to endure go beyond the punishment of losing the one thing we all share equally, our time. If we are to agree that denying someone who actually commits a real crime, their freedom of movement and restrict them to a controlled environment for a certain period of time, as a suitable punishment, then there should be no need to add extra malicious punishments on top of that. For those who have never been imprisoned, it may sound like a soft punishment, and we could argue that it may be somewhat for those who have maliciously taken someone’s life, but the vast majority of prisoners are not there because they murdered someone.

In fact, the majority of prisoners in prisons have not committed any violent crime, which is the only real argument for using prisons in the first place, in order to protect others from their violence. Instead, we fill our prisons with less-thans that do no wrong, but lack the wealth and status to avoid their persecutors’ malice. For anyone under the impression that losing our free time is not a sufficient punishment, try spending a few months in even the most comfortable of luxury hotel rooms and see how long it takes before the need to escape the room becomes overwhelming. Losing a sizeable portion of the short and precious time we have in life is a severe punishment (with perhaps the exception of our deluded immortals), but especially severe for those who have done no wrong.

Those charged with overseeing this punishment on prisoners can often become the creators of extra punishments, as mistreating, abusing, degrading, humiliating and dehumanizing our fellow humans is all part of a day’s work for those mired in differing worth. With the benefit of status and unaccountability, prison guards can get away with just about every wrong we can imagine, simply because they are performing these wrongs on people deemed unworthy of basic respect.

A culture of malicious belittling is just the foreplay for assaults, sexual assaults, rape, torture and murder, to name a few of the wrongs prisoners can expect to have added to their sentence of confinement, along with many other unnecessary punishments. The conditions that prisoners are expected to endure can be vile, unnecessarily cruel and humiliating, and then once they are released from their bondage, they are expected to value the society that mistreated them so badly. Good luck with that.

Hierarchies will always engage in torturing their prisoners, just as they will always terrorise their populations. Our modern-day hierarchies may sell their torture chambers as beacons of humanity by comparing them to the days when most of the wounds they inflicted were visible, but there is little that is humane about hierarchal justice. By demonizing prisoners, we make this inhumane treatment of people not only acceptable, but valued by many that seek elevated worth or just basic social belonging.

Many who have never been to prison believe they are violent places because they hold violent prisoners, and, of course, there is an element of truth to this. But it is those who run the prison who create a violent environment, as they are the ones that control that environment. It’s the same type of lie used by hierarchies when they claim immigrants or others are responsible for the negative aspects within the cultures they lord over and create.

It is the nature of those of us who value the more-than/less-than ignorances, to exploit those within a group who are deemed less-than we are, so perhaps we should not be too surprised that when we give one group of people power over another, they are inevitably going to take advantage of their unaccountability to satisfy their ignorances and base desires.

Holding their victims in such conditions that accelerate ill health and death is nothing new for our glorified wrongdoers, and they will continue this practice as it allows them to sell this type of abusive and murdering technique as more acceptable than other, more direct forms. Forcing prisoners to harm and murder other prisoners allows hierarchies to sell their murders as a consequence of their demonised prisoners’ violent tendencies, while somehow convincing many that the practices that are orchestrated in their prisons have nothing to do with the hierarchy that controls every aspect of them.

If prisons are supposed to help society to be free from crime, then, of course, they are utterly useless, as the most prolific criminals are the ones who own the justice system, but that aside for a moment, as prisons have a higher population of non-violent criminals than violent criminals, the majority of prisoners are of little physical threat to anyone.

Segregating violent people from non-violent people would be obvious to any logical mind, but as we are dealing with social hierarchies, mixing the two makes it much easier to orchestrate as many “unfortunate incidents” as they wish, in dealing with anyone who fails to grasp the magnificence of their glorious masters. Those involved within these justice systems conspire with one another to harm others as a standard practice, in order to elevate themselves or their careers, at their victims’ cost.

With many people put into prison even when there is no evidence of a crime, as so-called due process is rarely offered to those of low-status, it is never too difficult to imprison anyone a hierarchy targets. The process of an investigation into any crime or so-called crime is often incredibly poor, but for an accused of low social status, there is often less need for anything resembling a thorough investigation, as most can’t afford to defend against a system of wrongdoers that has unlimited funds and outnumbers them by hundreds of thousands, if not millions to one. Police are often content to have anyone take the fall for a crime to bolster their conviction rates, rather than have unsolved cases. Investigating a real crime and proving who committed it can be very difficult and costly, so we should not be too surprised that thorough investigations are rare and usually occur depending on status.

Even if we can afford to have a semblance of an investigation or the luxury of a trial, there is little to no chance of having impartiality within these cultures of hate that propagate ignorances to an extreme. Whether its police, lawyers, judges, juries…etc., all are only people (glorified or otherwise) who are all products of a society that champions and demonises wrongdoing depending on the status of the wrongdoers. Ignorances, bias, prejudice and emotion can all play their part in condemning the innocent, even if they are afforded the luxury of a trial by jury.

Even if we get a jury, such trials become more about who is the better storyteller and who has the most social status, while evidence and the truth can play little to no part in the process of those making a decision on guilt or innocence, leaving them to base their decisions on little more than beliefs, feelings, perceptions and, of course, the expectations of their elevated groups.

A trial where we are judged by our peers (ignoring the obvious problems that come with being judged by random people that may have never investigated anything in their lives) are supposed to be an improvement in assessing a case, while limiting the effects of corrupt justice systems criminalising anyone they wish, as opposed to trials that are judged by a judge who serves the interests of that justice system and the state that owns them. However, in our modern age, where all the rights and laws that exist to protect the innocent can all be body swerved by dragging everyone into the corporate legal world, in order to criminalise people who have done no wrong, it is no surprise that very few people even get a trial.

With some social hierarchies failing to even provide any trial, never mind a pretend trial, for as much as 95% of their prison populations, we can see just how little these systems care about any kind of justice and more about conviction rates and the exploitation of human beings. Many who have done no wrong are forced to endure months and even years in prison, as those who profit from these justice systems pretend to be “working hard” on arranging a trial, while torturing people to take a “deal” that always benefits the glorified wrongdoers.

When confronted with the reality of being submerged within a corrupt justice system, many are more willing to accept being blackmailed or taking a “plea deal” as some like to call it, as any faith in getting a fair trial within these systems can quickly die after enduring months or years of harm. This practice of imprisoning people for a long time, without any evidence, any victim or even a hint of wrongdoing, just to encourage their victims to accept a plea of guilt, is a profitable one for many involved in these justice systems. Financial incentives for those involved in attaining convictions and guilty pleas creates a culture that prioritises personal gain above uncovering the truth or exercising justice.

This makes persecuting innocent people, even when there is an abundance of reasonable doubt and even certainty of innocence, commonplace. This practice also allows lazy investigation into crimes, and helps to maintain the public delusion that these systems are effective at achieving justice by having highly inflated conviction rates. With few innocent people given the courtesy of a fair trial to prove their innocence, a social hierarchy, as well as all involved in their persecution, can pretend they right a lot more wrongs than they really do. Innocent until proven guilty may be available for some, but many will be treated as guilty until they prove they are innocent within these systems, despite the burden of proof being on those planning a new house, car, kitchen or holiday with their high conviction rate.

Those who judge without understanding cannot judge effectively, making the ignorant perfect judges within our cultures of differing worth. As understanding always takes effort and is discouraged within such cults, most prefer to judge others based on their group’s perceptions. Being judged by our peers instead of a single individual, arguably, does at least give the appearance of some kind of limit on corruption, but not very much, as they are only in the position of judging others because they themselves have been very obedient to their hierarchy. This alone arguably renders their judgement as poor at best.

Jurors are often selected for their predisposition to the favour of their selectors, to ensure convictions, rather than their ability to understand the balance between real evidence, hearsay or reasonable doubt, never mind right and wrong. Jurors, like all involved in these justice industries, have their ignorances that influence their thinking, and we see this clearly in the way juries can base their verdict purely on the appearance of the individual on trial. Few jurors, like most of the population, understand how their hierarchy’s justice system works, never mind understanding the laws they pretend to value, and we won’t even get into jury nullification.

Even if we had highly efficient professional juries that were trained in understanding different types of evidence and investigations, they would become corrupted within any social hierarchy in order to prevent them from convicting most of their hierarchy. Public prosecutors are really just private corporations’ prosecutors that serve the interests of their employers, not the public. By pretending to serve the public’s interests above their own, it’s easier to exploit their populations, and we see this all too often, especially in legal cases where there is no wrongdoing.

Imagine we are dragged into court, having done no wrong, to be faced with “Bob’s Big Burger Booth” corporation trying to prosecute us because we ate a burger without onions or some other nonsense. Many would question the validity of these courts and laws. However, by using the land’s name or an established authority instead, we can be prosecuted by “Slaveland” or “the king” or “supreme leader” with less questioning around the legitimacy of such nonsense, as it sounds more official when the corporation bit left out, of course.

The truth is, we can all be prosecutors, and for many, what some call “private prosecutions” is the only way to even get a case heard, especially when it is against someone serving their social hierarchy. However, as hierarchies monopolise their justice systems, they are not going to encourage their populations to use any real access to their justice system by encouraging them to conduct their own prosecutions against them.

Kangaroo courts are not the only show in town, as we also get the hilarious spectacle of our social hierarchies conducting investigations into themselves, with their justice systems and forces forming their own internal investigations with the inevitable outcomes that occur when accountability is at zero. Imagine all the burglars or rapists in any area have an office, and every time someone is burgled or raped, they have to report it to their office. Solved cases would be a rarity, and that is the standard result when those of low status rely on their hierarchy’s institutions for justice. Too many who work in these justice industries will happily see people being harmed for doing no wrong whatsoever, while they, at best, get a token investigation done for the wrongdoings they commit, just to say they investigated any incident before declaring no further action needed, even when their wrongdoing has cost someone their life. The ignorant can even find great glee in such things, as it feeds their superiority affliction.

So we have this utter lunacy where most of those who work for these justice industries can almost never commit a crime in the eyes of these farcical systems. While those of us who have never committed a crime in our lives, can suffer abuse at the hands of those within these industries and even end up having our property, children and lives taken from us. We can be abused and imprisoned simply for being viewed as less-than in the minds of the ignorant, who care little when many lose their life during or after the ordeal they subjected their victims to.

To counter this entrenched injustice, it is left to the public to prosecute those within the justice industry who commit these crimes against the public, as they will not prosecute a member of their own club unless there is sufficient public pressure to right the many wrongs the public endures on a daily basis. Yet how many people know how to use their social hierarchy’s justice systems without being pacified by a lawyer or any other more-than? Not many. This is, of course, by design, as hierarchal education systems are so utterly pathetic when it comes to teaching its populations how to use their own justice systems, because if all were competent in the nonsense practices that are passed off as due process, the justice industries would not be able to use and abuse the public for fear of being held accountable by those populations for their lawlessness, in the same way the slave classes are.

As social hierarchal can only play with the idea of justice, their justice systems and courts are like games to be played, where only the home players know the rules of the game in order to always ensure victory for those players and defeat for their victims. Even if their victims work out the rules of the game, the rules can be changed at will in order to ensure the controlling players always win. Manipulation of codes, laws and words are used in order to set up their victims and mask the scale of blatant robbery hierarchies thrive on, by selling the illusion of justice, rather than judging any right or wrong.

Anyone who has experienced their hierarchy’s justice system void of any wrongdoing will know the level of contempt many of those involved in these industries have for the public they claim to serve. They will lie, threaten, use and abuse in order to “win” their case or gain some other perceived victory that satisfies their egos and ignorances. With the protection that comes with being in the largest criminal gang around, they know they can get away with this behaviour, as agents of our glorified wrongdoers can do no wrong in the eyes of their wrongdoers justice system, as long as they are ultimately serving their masters greed.

No individual involved within a social hierarchys’ justice system or forces (police or armed) are paid to concern themselves with right and wrong, they are paid to do what they are told to do, and that is always to facilitate their hierarchy’s monopolies on wrongdoing. Right and wrong may be sold to many of them as motivation, and the good v evil nonsense is usually thrown in there too, but it takes a lot of ignorances to ignore the wrongs we are expected to commit while pretending to care about justice.

Oath-taking and superficial loyalty are always a must for social hierarchies and the ignorant minions they bestow their authority and monopoly of violence upon, as few of us naturally defend and aid wrongdoers void of threat or reward. Members of our hierarchies’ forces and secret cults in particular are often exposed to these glorifying and demonizing conditioning rituals, as they always possess the means to threaten their hierarchy by sharing the truth. So it is always important to make sure they are the most broken in or brainwashed, to ensure they don’t think about using their knowledge or power for anything other than serving their hierarchy’s interests. All who follow and bow to the altar of ignorance are always the easiest to manipulate.

Those of us susceptible to glorifying and demonizing others make the best enforcers for our glorified wrongdoers. An enforcer who knows all are equal could end up trying to hold those with status accountable for a wrong, so such people are usually weeded out of these forces. When horrific wrongs committed by enforcers are exposed, the same type of rhetoric, like a “bad apple among the barrel” is often used to excuse such acts. However, it is always a rotten barrel that expels any good apples, in a bid to rid themselves of anyone that values right over wrong.

Many enforcers are more interested in imposing their will and egos onto others, rather than upholding any law, and most don’t even know the laws of their land and are instead trained in the more profitable and exploitative legal nonsense. As no accountability whatsoever allows enforcers to harm others at will, they can indulge themselves with their more-than/less-than ignorances to an extreme. In fact, many are incentivised by their hierarchy to indulge their violent and vindictive tendencies to create reactions in their victims, so that they can sell a normal human reaction as the act of a criminal, to encourage a population to become unnaturally obedient.

As enforcers, threatening people becomes the only language we use in order to pander to our masters’ will and our own delusions of elevated worth, and we use every wrong to fulfil these delusions with the added threats of prison and death. Prisons are just part of our hierarchies’ systems of oppression, and they are never about rehabilitation, no matter how many try to sell them as such, as what are they wishing to attempt for at least a second time to habilitate to? Well as habilitate means to clothe or dress up, and to fit, then they wish to dress everyone as a slave and fit them into their master/slave cults, thus their meaning is obviously to restore them to an obedient, productive and profitable slave (or a taxpayer as they prefer to call them), even if they were never that in the first place.

As prisons and those hired to run them dehumanise people in order to exploit them, the extreme environments of mass wrongdoing imposed upon prisoners are environments that can turn the mildest, calmest, righteous, non-violent human being into someone who wants to harm all those involved in the wrongs they are or were subjected to, as our desire for justice can run deep. As many enforcers are the instigators of punishment, rather than the overseers, they inevitably invite themselves to be targeted.

Take any child and stick them in a cupboard for hours at a time, even for just a few weeks, and that child will understandably have a few issues they may wish to express. In many ways, we can judge a society by how they treat their prisoners, and most hierarchies treat them very badly at best. As prisoners make the cheapest workforce within our cultures of greed (as they don’t need to be paid and can be exposed to awful working conditions once their status has been reduced to sub-human), whenever a hierarchy’s workforce is not large enough, it is easy to criminalise and imprison the low-status in society to bolster that workforce.

With our hierarchal prison systems being used as another income stream, rather than a fitting punishment for any real crime, we can see how lucrative the business of criminalising human nature can be and fits well within the ethos of any master/slave culture. Imagine a population where no one harmed anyone, under a social hierarchy, this is, of course, impossible, as harming people is what they do. But just for the fun of it, let’s imagine a non-crime spree has broken out. All involved within these justice industries would become impoverished without their products to feed their lifestyles, not to mention their stakeholders. Making everything a crime and everyone a criminal ensures easy pickings for our unjust justice systems to maintain and enhance the greed of a few, and reward all of those involved in the process.

With the abundance of wrongdoing that our social hierarchies engage in, it is no surprise that protests are a common occurrence among their populations. Many even proclaim their social advancement over competing social hierarchies with things like the so-called right to protest, even when it is common for protests to be met with force from the hierarchy. Any peaceful protest that is too close to threatening the profits and control of a hierarchy often results in the protesters being demonised and our hierarchies’ enforcers being glorified to avoid addressing any issue raised.

This demonising of people who are often just asking for very reasonable basic respect, is very easily achieved, as many social hierarchies have their minions, fringe groups and so-called secret societies that they can use to manipulate their population into valuing abusing people that desirer basic considerations. That and all their enforcers are conditioned to perceive their hierarchies’ slave classes as their enemy. In the case of peaceful protests, hierarchies can simply send their malicious groups into any protest and pretend to be protesters in order to incite violence. Once a protest can be declared as the actions of a violent mob, the reason for the protest can be ignored while concealing the hierarchy’s acts of violence on the true protesters. This allows those that organise even the most peaceful of protests to be vilified as the instigators of lawlessness, in order to silence the protests’ concerns or cause, as well as discourage future protests.

We also have the bizarre concept of a “legal protest” that gives any protest a bad name, as the whole point of a protest is to disagree with our glorified wrongdoers’ legal wrongdoing by causing them an inconvenience to create public awareness of their wrongdoing, not to be herded into a quiet corner where they can be ignored and ridiculed by their minions.

The very method of protesting by taking to the streets just shows how grossly inefficient these social groups are when it comes to any real social engagement or social debate. But this is, of course, by design, as no social hierarchy wants to dilute their control, wealth and power among those they wish to dominate. In fact their intent is always to acquire more at the cost of those they lord over, hence why we see these corporate entities of government sprawling into more and more of their populations’ lives like an uncontrollable parasite the longer any reign lasts.

Laws, codes or rules, status seekers can call them what they want, but they are more often than not, little more than glorified threats from masters to slaves at the heart of the nonsense, as they are created by a hierarchy to ensure great control over those they dominate. With these gospels of hypocrisy superimposed onto their slaves’ reality, it is no wonder that many involved within the industries that profit so much from them can waste a lifetime and even generations trying to fit their seas of nonsense into a thimble of truth.

Their ignorant intellectual classes are used to debate their pseudo-morality in an effort to distract themselves and others from its sparseness, while transforming every right into a wrong. Nonsense is always nonsense, but when it is backed by violence instead of evidence, then that nonsense gains more value and is taken more seriously by the ignorant who suffer from differing worth.

By declaring a monopoly on violence, social hierarchies get to evade accountability from their own population. But when they desire to conquer a competing social hierarchy, their monopoly on violence is shared with their population, as long as they control who their population can be violent against, and there is nothing like war to unite an ignorant population. Within the cauldron of war, where greed is paraded as righteousness, we get a hysterical barrage of sham morality from our social hierarchies in order to rally support for the protection or enhancement of the wealth of a few, and more often than not, it works.

The Naked Truth

Right and wrong are, of course, just concepts within our minds, concepts we use to navigate within ourselves and the groups we are part of. Nature could not care less about such concepts, but then again, as we are nature, perhaps it does to a degree, as the idea of right and wrong can loom strong within us (some more than others) and other animals. In a way, all wrongs come down to stealing. We want something others have, so we harm others to get it, and as status seekers are never too keen on sharing, their prolific wrongdoing is perhaps inevitable.

We even have laws that make our own bodies a crime. People being subjected to our wrongdoers’ terror for doing no wrong but being naked, only makes sense to people conditioned to a culture that frowns upon nakedness. The irony of cultures that criminalise nakedness, while forcibly subjecting their victims to it in order to humiliate and abuse them, appears to be lost on many that value such things. We may be the only species that sees itself as naked, and we could argue about the reasons that led to this concept. Ah, to hell with it, let’s explore some of those possibilities just for fun.

Now, of course, we cover our bodies to protect ourselves from harsh environments, but even in climates that we find perfectly comfortable to be naked in, our modern hierarchies now force or encourage their populations to cover up. At least the parts of the body they magically declared as offensive (normally mirrored in their language). Our hierarchies have a great influence on what we wear, as clothes are used to signify social status and worth within these groups. Then there is our need to differentiate between opposing groups, such as to facilitate our habit of killing each other at the behest of our status seekers, as two large groups of naked people who all look alike could confuse our glorified murderers with whom they have been told to hate and kill.

Our political structures have not evolved much from our primate cousins, as some primates are dominated by a large, powerful male in order to control females for sex. Whereas others form coalitions to create a credible threat to any larger, more powerful individual or group, in order to gain control of females for sex, and we too can drift between the two depending on the social environment.

As social status is used by males to help convince females to have sex with them, it is possibly in part at least, that for our older males and our somewhat past their prime male coalitions could convince those they have control over to cover their bodies in a bid to discourage their females from being tempted to have sex with younger low-status males in their prime. Not to mention status-seeking can be much more malicious when those of lower status look better than those with high status when naked.

Once the status delusion becomes common, status seekers desperately try to mimic those of high status in every aspect, so draping their bodies in whatever their hierarchy drapes theirs in becomes common. Of course, there are more sinister reasons why we cover up rather than just another superficial attempt to appear more-than, as rape is a very common practice within our species. With differing worth promoting rape as a right among many, covering up our bodies and our children’s bodies to discourage our more-than rapists, is going to play a factor.

It is no doubt all of these reasons and more that many identify with the concept of being naked and accept that a naked body in public is a criminal act, rather than just a natural thing. But when we are putting people in prison just for being naked, while glorifying wrongdoers, we really have to question ourselves. Within a social hierarchy, freedom of the mind can result in the body being confined to prison, while a confined mind that serves the greed of a few can grant the body freedom to roam.

As doing what is right within a wrongdoers’ cultures can lead to persecution or death, most individuals and groups avoid this deadly habit. As every hierarchal police force is paid to force the populations they claim to serve into surrendering their wealth into the hands of their hierarchy, those not too keen on the extortion always risk violent treatment. The group of people, many know as gypsies, shows us the level of contempt free people can expect from social hierarchies and their minions.

Having a group of relatively free people within the borders of any social hierarchy presents a huge problem for a hierarchy who have established many lies and institutions to produce generations of contented slaves. Having contented slaves interact with people who display even the smallest of freedoms they themselves lack can undo much of their indoctrination. When slaves come to understand that there are people who are free from much of the persecution and exploitations they experience every day, they are often ignorant enough to hate those with more freedoms than themselves, rather than hate their oppressors.

If slaves understand there are people who avoid being so easily exploited by their social hierarchy, it could lead to those slaves questioning much of the nonsense they may have come to value. For this reason, all social hierarchies must demonise, belittle, and ridicule groups like gypsies to ensure they are perceived as less than even the lowliest of slaves within that hierarchy. This helps to encourage their slaves to value their oppression over the freedoms of gypsies or other relatively free people.

Being vilified for existing is just the start of the wrongs any free, nomadic and borderless people should expect from any territorial hierarchy. Destruction and theft of property, assault, rape, murder and genocide, gypsies have experienced it all, as have the ancestors of contented slaves, so they have a lot in common. It is no wonder gypsies keep their interactions between the slave nations they pass through to a minimum, as many contented slaves will gladly persecute free people if they listen to their master’s lies and suffer from the shared injustice ignorance. We could argue that the freest people on our planet are those who have the least contact with any hierarchy. A challenge that becomes more difficult with each passing year.

People who ignore rich men’s lines on maps (or illegal immigrants as social hierarchies like to call them) can expect much of the same treatment that gypsies have endured. Immigrants are not registered as the property of the social hierarchy of the lands that they immigrate to. So, technically immigrants have more freedom from their legal nonsense than the resident debt slaves do, but, of course, no social hierarchy respects their own laws, so persecution is always near. To deem migration illegal should be of little concern to anyone, as everything is deemed illegal to our glorified wrongdoers in order to exploit human beings, but as their armies of wrongdoers are vast and overly keen to inflict harm on others, many must be cautious of their nonsense to limit the harm they could receive.

Those who rattle their sabres whenever their masters tell them that immigrants are responsible for their hardships rarely seem too concerned when immigrants that have enough wealth and status to upgrade their labelling to investors, do the exact same thing those they are encouraged to hate do. So good immigrants and bad immigrants are unsurprisingly defined by wealth and status within such cultures. We are a species that has always migrated in order to aid our survival, and no amount of oppressive laws will ever change that. Ironically, most, if not every, individual that partakes in oppressing immigrants owes their existence to immigrants. However, as ignorances are so highly prized, many maybe totally unaware of the basics of our species history and nature.

In our modern world of deceit, migration is just another resource to be monopolised, exploited and profited from by breaking up and destroying families. Years of extortion by the legal industry to validate their existence, as well as being exploited to satisfy the usual labour and sex desires of glorified wrongdoers, is the kind of treatment many immigrants can expect to endure in such civilized societies. The ignorances required for one human being born within a line on a map to see themselves as more-than another born outwith the same line are vast, but social hierarchies are never short on ignorances. As immigrants are one of the groups of people that hierarchies try to convince their contented slaves of being responsible for the level of oppression they endure, it is easy to see why many who value their hierarchy’s lies, view immigrants as a major problem.

Only those registered as the property of the social hierarchy that controls them are classed as civilians of that hierarchy. Anyone not registered, or born outside of their control and enters their territory is free from much of their legal control. As non-civilians are not registered as the hierarchy’s property, they should be classed as humans, at least up until they are forced or coerced to re-present themselves from a human being to something that is less-than, like an immigrant. All humans that re-present themselves as a legal fiction, are subject to the whims, codes or legislation of their hierarchy. Those plucked from the slave classes to serve their masters’ interests, as enforcers, for example, can gain exemption from many of these rules or laws.

Our hierarchies have a habit of using immigrants to bolster their forces when their slave classes have either been decimated, as their cannon fodder, or when too many slaves know too well the true nature of their hierarchy, and thus have no interest in serving their greed as target practice for those they wish to enslave. As those who join these forces are expected to harm others, they cannot be subject to the same standards as civilians, who are expected to obey every unjust rule and act as a saint, no matter the wrongs that befall them. While enforcers can do no wrong, no matter the wrongs they commit, as long as they serve their masters’ interests.

It may seem obvious to many that it is the social hierarchy that dictates the lives of their population, and not any group of less-than immigrants, but as long as slaves are focused on immigrants, or anything else for that matter, they are not focused on their master’s culpability. The unemployed, houseless, low-status criminals, prisoners and immigrants are all groups who are often dehumanized and stripped of their human status, in order to be exploited and pointed at as a reason for all the problems that come with enduring any social hierarchy and the malice they require to elevate themselves above others. Basically, any group that a hierarchy is not regularly stealing money from (or non-tax-payers as they call them), are not always seen as being equally human to those that feed the greed of a few.

The Farce of Human Rights

While on the subject of being human, let’s embrace our hypocrisy and dive into the murky waters of human rights. We shall try to keep this as simple as possible, and get to the point of how they are used in order to maintain wrongdoing. So we have “The International Bill of Human Rights” (IBHR), which is made up of three documents or treaties that include “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR), which was introduced in December of 1948. Then in 1966 (more devil nonsense with a flipped 9) we get the additions of the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” (ICCPR) and “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights” (ICESCR).

These later additions in effect, trumped the UDHR in favour of our sockmaker and social hierarchies political and commercial interests. There was inevitably a dispute, with the USSR and so-called “developing countries” who all wanted one single treaty, where all adhere to the same rules, on one side. While the USA and so-called “developed western countries” (or our sockmakers most controlled vassals) that wanted two documents, on the other side, as a single document was against their capitalist policy of human exploitation, federalism, and USA stakeholders support. Well, we all know we can’t go around making human rights that negatively affect the interests of USA stakeholders, as that would just be complete and utter madness.

Now, to nobody’s surprise, the more economically dominant hierarchies (the ones that own the monopoly on human pseudo-morality and our MOE) ended up getting these rights split between the ICCPR and ICESCR treaties, in order to serve their interests more than the rights of human beings. The UDHR focuses on human rights (sort of), whereas the ICCPR and ICESCR treaties are legally binding instruments on the basis of the principle of pacta sunt servanda. So that clears that up then! Basically, this nonsense is used to reduce the status of any human being to something of less worth and more exploitable under these laws in order to avoid having to respect their human rights.

Calling a human being a civilian, employee, immigrant,…etc., is an act that surrenders their human rights in favour of our glorified wrongdoers one-sided contracts, which are void of full disclosure. Pacta sunt servanda is a Latin phrase that translates in English as “agreements must be kept” or “promises must be kept”. In other words, when “parties” enter into a contract, they must respect the terms and conditions of the contract representing the expression of their agreement, even when those “agreements” are forced, coerced, or even none-existent in the minds of the exploited. Thus, reducing human rights to something that celebrates human exploitation.

Our present and history are full of social hierarchies breaking treaties, promises, agreements and contracts, so again, it’s all just for show until leverage can be gained to rewrite any agreement. It is a principle in international law (Yep! Apparently, they have a principle, who knew?), which says that international treaties should be upheld by all the signatories, but this definition is linked to its application in international law, whereby signatories to a treaty must perform their obligations in good faith.

So we are putting human rights into the hands of our social hierarchies’ good faith, instead of hard, enforceable laws. Yeah, that’s always going to end up the same way. This basically means that these additional “covenants” to human rights allow our social hierarchies to wedge their enforced contracts between human being and their human rights, making human rights totally redundant and reducing them to a public relations exercise. As if this is news to any aware slave.

Let’s say human rights are supposed to (in principle at least) apply to all humans, but in the world of our deluded status seekers, some of us are more human than others. So, for the sake of argument, we shall set aside our deluded friends understanding of what a human is, and recognise that we are all human, regardless of any other identity some may impose upon us.

As we are all human outside the confines of a social hierarchy, we shall view human rights as applicable to all, at least in this book, if not within our own particular cultures. So, as human rights are applicable to all, they are a great threat to all status seekers and their social hierarchies, as anything that protects those they need to harm to elevate their own worth is always going to be viewed in a negative light to those wishing to inflict that harm. Hence why social hierarchies are never too keen on human rights, and much prefer to sell the idea of civil rights, which are, in effect, the rights of slaves. So most hierarchies glorify their civil rights while avoiding the subject of the human rights that they violate on a daily basis.

Hierarchies interpretations of crimes against humanity are always good for a laugh, as those who are normally judging who has committed such acts have committed the very same acts, and more often than not, to a much greater degree. International law is also hilarious, as we get this mass hypocrisy where hierarchies declare the acts and actions they commit as great and glorious, while identical acts and actions by a competing hierarchy merits condemnation. A hierarchy that champions its thirst for nuclear weapons, while condemning another hierarchy for even thinking about defending itself with the same weaponry, is just one example of how utterly pointless international laws are within our master/slave cultures, and exposes them as just another veil of pseudo-morality used to hide mass wrongdoing behind.

Let’s have a chuckle and examine these “human rights” that many hierarchies like to champion, while condemning others and ignoring when it suits them. Many human rights are concealed or obscured within the laws of social hierarchies, or adumbrated, as they prefer to call it, and pass off lesser rights as human rights, so that they can claim to respect human rights as part of their whole pretence in valuing human lives. On another side note, isn’t adumbrated a great word. Meaning to resemble something else. Thus, a dumb rate of civil rights passing itself off as human rights, lends to it definition rather accurately.

Anyway, the joke goes even further with the term “universal inalienable human rights”, used by wrongdoers to sell themselves as moral champions, even when most know these rights are not applicable to individuals within a small village, never mind universal, and are very much alienable under any social hierarchy. Their whole system of bribery, or lobbying as it is now called, along with the practice of selling laws that profit those who hide their wrongdoing behind corporations, also celebrates the fact that their laws are very much alienable.

Human rights sound all very lovely, but when even those declaring them have no interest in pretending to uphold them, they become the same as every other “right” individuals have under a social hierarchy. Granted, “the right to do what you are told or be harmed”, may not sound quite as catchy as “human rights”, but it would be a hell of a lot more accurate.

Anyone browsing over these human rights will understand why no hierarchy cares for them, so we could put them down to a marketing campaign that was used to appease the slave classes in the aftermath of our sockmaker’s WW2 meat grinder. Or we could be more forgiving and say they came about due to the efforts of the more benevolent among us, although they rarely get a look-in within our cultures of glorified wrongdoing, so maybe it was just the fatigue of mass wrongdoing, or a combination of these and many other factors.

Either way, as agreements or treaties between social hierarchies are rarely honoured or stand the test of time, these compulsive liars were never going to honour the UDHR, as they are incapable of being honest with themselves, never mind each other. And our glorified wrongdoers can’t help themselves in wronging others when the opportunity to gain more wealth and status arises. Anyway, let’s have a quick look at the human rights within the UDHR that our hierarchies were so desperate to amend, as they could not even pretend to abide by them for two decades before amending them to suit their desire to harm others.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Article 1:- All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. [Well, this just goes against everything a social hierarchy stands for, no wonder they hate it, and what about our sisterhood?].

Article 2:- Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. [Yep, social hierarchies pretend to value all of this with a straight face].

Article 3:- Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. [Well, everyone at the right end of a hierarchy. Those they need to murder, enslave and terrorize do not qualify as “Everyone”].

Article 4:- No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. [“Shall” means not now, but maybe one day, so this is just more word play, as without slaves there is no hierarchy. Traditional slavery may be out of fashion (well, for most), and debt slavery celebrated, but with more slaves and fewer free people than ever before, only status seekers can take this one seriously].

Article 5:- No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. [Unless at the hands of a social hierarchies enforcers. What school or any other hierarchal institution does not do all of these things to their victims? And good luck observing this one being respected within any hierarchal justice system].

Article 6:- Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. [A person, not a human being. A fiction or thing can be a person and has lower status than a human, so hierarchies like this one to aid their exploitation. Even within their HUMAN rights, they can’t help reducing the status of a human to an exploitable entity].

Article 7:- All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. [As long as they can afford it, but a social hierarchy without discrimination, and one that understands the word equal, where are they?].

Article 8:- Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. [Sorry, ladies, only granted to him, but no social hierarchy respects their own laws, never mind their population’s rights, so not really missing out on anything here, and good luck finding competent national tribunals].

Article 9:- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. [Shall, maybe one day in the future, but for now. Many will be subjected to such things on a daily basis, and this was very much the case during the Covid-19 farce].

Article 10:- Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. [No hierarchy would be happy with a little equality, never mind any full version. Independent and impartial from Mars, perhaps. And what about charges against her?].

Article 11:- 1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence. [Social hierarchies rarely waste time trying to prove guilt and much prefer to assume it until their victims prove their innocence, and public trials are fast dying out and being replaced with coerced plea deals as laws are avoided in favour of exploitative legal code. And yet again, what about her guarantees for her defence?].

2. No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed. [Shall again. We can some day in the future enjoy the few freedoms we have, up until those freedoms are against their laws or codes, void of the punishment of breaking a future law. Basically, if we break a law that does not yet exist, we won’t be punished for breaking it when it was not against the law. How gracious. We are such a hateful, petty and vindictive species that we need this law].

Article 12:- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. [Again, ladies, no protection of honour or reputation for you. Swap the “No one” with the “Everyone” and replace the “nor to” with ”and”, and this is like a to-do list for every social hierarchy. Shall again, as we have spyware in almost every home].

Article 13:- 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. [Freedom of movement is obviously interpreted as restricting and extorting. Not seeing the bit about a licence or being fined anywhere in this one. Well, we can understand why all social hierarchies really hate this one].

2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. [So immigrations is all good. No passport required then, even if we don’t own our own private jet. Well, as long as we are male and own a country, this one is great].

Article 14:- 1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. [If only there were a country we could go to that did not practice persecution to seek asylum in].

2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. [No asylum for wrongdoers, unless they have wealth and status, of course, and aren’t all crimes of a social species political in nature? And as the purposes and principles of the UN are contrary to rightdoing, our hierarchies actually comply with this one].

Article 15 :- 1. Everyone has the right to a nationality. [All slaves require a masters branding].

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. [Shall again. Slaves can’t escape their masters’ branding and can only adopt or swap one fiction for another. Either way they must always have a branding. Anyone who refuses to identify with their master’s fictions can be housed in the nearest mental asylum. How progressive we are, but what about her nationality?}.

Article 16:- 1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. [None of us would be here if we relied on marriage to found a family, but it’s nice to see females are included in this one].

2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. [None of that obligated half consent for unintended spouses’ nonsense allowed, well, for some anyway].

3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. [This one is hilarious, as what “state” does not destroy families every single day, and where is this society that protects families? If the family is the glorified few that is natural and fundamental to theft, fraud, torture, rape and murder, then maybe this one makes sense].

Article 17:- 1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. [Up until their hierarchy decides to steal it, of course].

2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. {As long as they do not engage with a social hierarchy or their minions in any way that exposes them to these glorified thieves, and are females still unworthy of owning property? Again with the whole deferred shall thing, it’s like the words “will”, “can” and “should” don’t exist, as well as basic morals].

Article 18:- Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. [Yep! Some of us are so far gone that we feel the need to make a law that grants those worthy enough the right to have a thought and a conscience, as we can only imagine where we would be if such a law did not exist. Males can choose any rich man’s god they wish or manifest their own, but sorry females, looks like you’re stuck with the ones your given, and don’t even think about manifesting any of you’re own].

Article 19:- Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. [Except those who share inconvenient truths. Non-disclosure order, anyone? No wonder social hierarchies with their need to “censor” the truth, really hate this one. Try exercising this on any of their heavily controlled public platforms. We could fill endless books with the names of all who have been persecuted, imprisoned and murdered for exercising this right within every social hierarchy].

Article 20:- 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. [Until our hierarchy’s stooges and enforcers with their malice, weapons and tear gas arrive to make things anything but peaceful. We can see why no hierarchy values this one, as if they did, they would need to bin all their nonsense loitering laws that are used to prevent groups that don’t celebrate gross injustice and inequality from getting together].

2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association. [Unless we wish to have any social worth or slide along the social spectrum of differing worth. The compulsory registering of new-borns, nationalism, compulsory taxation, compulsory education and conscription, to name a few, all go against this one and shows how little our hierarchies respect this].

Article 21:- 1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. [We all have the right to become our dictator’s puppets or engage in the pretence of meaning in choosing one. We are so spoiled. Well, the males of the species at least].

2. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. [As long as he, not she, has a country and enough money or worth to appease those who control the access].

3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures. [The will of the people will be ignored in favour of the interests of corporations with which those in authority are affiliated. The outcome of secret votes are much easier to manipulate and control than any transparent free voting process. That probably explains the “secret or Free” option, with every hierarchy unsurprisingly choosing the secret one. Although there’s that word shall again, so maybe we might get genuine elections one day].

Article 22:- Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality. [All slaves have the right to have a think and come to their own realization, as long as they realize they are less-than their masters, by giving them a meagre social existence that makes them appear less-than in order to facilitate mass exploitation. As members of any society are subject to the spectrum of differing worth, this right very much depends on where we fall on that spectrum. Again, sorry ladies, no dignity for you, and forget about developing your personalities for free].

Article 23:- 1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. [All slaves are free to labour for their masters in any of their monopolised fields, which all feed the greed of the few by allowing a third to a half of their wealth to be stolen from them in the form of taxes. If just and favourable conditions were respected, there would be no hierarchies, and we all know our species would have died out long ago without protection from unemployment. Only a slave culture could stigmatise the joy of not being a slave to others].

2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. [Except if you are female or another form of low-status human. This one isn’t exactly our capitalist’s ethos. As if a group of status seekers would ever value this one].

3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. [All who allow the few to steal a large percentage of their wealth will be aided, in order to continue the practice, should they become unemployed, as long as they are male, of course. While those unwilling to work for their masters will be subjected to an existence that is unworthy of human dignity].

4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. [All slaves have the right to gather and have a moan about their servitude, as long as they continue to hand over their wealth to a few. Again, as long as they are male. Anyone seeing a pattern here?].

Article 24:- Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay. [Does a 15-hour working week with 26 weeks holiday a year sound reasonable to everyone?].

Article 25:- 1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. [As long as that standard includes malnutrition, homelessness, destruction of the family unit and very poor medical care. All social hierarchies desire to strip their slaves of circumstances beyond their control, so no wonder they hate this one. And again, sorry ladies, no standard of living for circumstances beyond your control for you].

2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection. [All those born in wedlock would not exist if all those born out of it did not. It says much about our cultures that there are words between “All children” and “shall”. And again, maybe one day, so for now, bastards may or may not enjoy the same social protections].

Article 26:- 1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. [Our hierarchy’s attempts to condition and indoctrinate their slaves into serving their interests will be free of charge. How generous, so no taxes to pay for their education industries then? A high level of obedience will grant access to higher conditioning. Indoctrination into differing worth is compulsory, so we have a form of torture as a human right. Hierarchies must really love this one, as the basis of merit is our wealth and status].       

2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. [Well, anyone who has had their family broken apart, raped or murdered by the United Nations notions of peace, will understand their direction of education is one of valuing lies and wrongdoing. If anyone knows of any peace the UN has maintained, then put your answers on a postcard and send it to the UN. Winner gets a 2-week holiday to the latest part of the world that is experiencing the UN’s version of peace. As for tolerance, understanding, respect, friendship and fundamental freedoms, no hierarchal education system can stomach this one, but as it shall be one day, they don’t have to worry for now].

3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. [But not to their offspring. Parents will have a say in the lies their kids are told, but have no right to be told any truths their hierarchy disapproves of, but maybe they shall, one day. For example, many parents who choose not to have their kids told they are in the wrong body (in order to enrich the few who sell castrating drugs) or can transform every wrong into a right by simply wearing their master’s magical enforcers uniform, have no such prior right to choose].

Article 27:- 1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. [Community! What community? If we suffer from the ignorance of differing worth to become status seekers and sycophants, then maybe we too can be part of our community’s culture of hate and wrongdoing. To “enjoy” what passes as the arts can often be a challenge, void of the ignorances of the time and place, and to “share” in those scientific advancements is to overpay for everything that has been monopolised and patented by a large corporation. All social hierarchies destroy communities, as exclusive societies hate inclusion, so as long as we are participating in poverty, all’s good].

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author. [Until those with high status use the legal industry to steal it from them. Sorry again, ladies, no moral or material interests for your work].

Article 28:- Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realised. [But every hierarchy will ignore them, and partly realised is unattainable in any culture of differing worth, never mind fully].

Article 29:- 1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. [Wow, these guys really hate females with a personality. Basically, only productive male slaves can develop a personality, according to this lot anyway].

2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. [Well, we first need to have a just, moral and democratic society that gives a damn about the welfare of its population, never mind one that has no females in it to make use of this one. More shall stuff, so again, maybe one day].

3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. [Well, if our purposes and principles are engaging in every wrong, then this is one of the only human rights that hold worth within our cultures].

Article 30:- Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. [So don’t use this declaration to engage in our glorified wrongdoers’ age-old practice of interpreting wrongs as rights. We have hierarchies that are vastly more qualified for such things. Those that own the UN and other vassals must have had a good giggle about this one].

Now, we may poke a little fun at these human rights for obvious reasons, as let’s face it, status seekers’ nonsense cries out to be mocked. However, we could argue that having the concept of human rights among social hierarchies and their slaves is at least a step in the right direction, even if they are ignored or bypassed by every social hierarchy that couldn’t care less about such things, as they all love reducing the status of humans to something they deem unworthy of human rights. Making all slaves aware of the mere concept of human rights can be a struggle alone within our cultures of wrongdoing, never mind getting a sizeable percentage of a hierarchal conditioned population to value them.

These UDHR may well be used by gross wrongdoers to pretend they value some kind of morality to gain support for inflicting their wrongs onto those they demonise, but at least it’s something regardless of its superficiality. We must bear in mind that these human rights are made up by a social hierarchy that call themselves the United Nations, which is a private corporation whose primary concern is the interests of its owners (who are, of course, our lovely sockmakers) and not the rights of human beings. Yep, they own everything.

Uniting Wrongdoers

The United Nations (UN) is, of course, a complete farce and just another exercise in glorified hypocrisy. The UN is our sockmakers’ attempt to mask their wrongdoing behind notions of morality and common decency, despite displaying a distinct lack of such things on a regular basis. The UN sells the idea that all nations that join (or bend the knee) are afforded protection from any invader by all those who are part of the UN (the likely invaders they want protection from), with all members having to contribute to a UN army that would defend any member under attack.

This sounds like something any nation would like to be part of to avoid being attacked. However, no UN army has ever been activated to defend or even attempt to defend any of their members from their invaders (who are mostly our sockmakers’ vassals) in the endless wars that the UN’s owners profit from so much. The UN is nothing more than a propagandist’s dream, where hollow words are regurgitated and listened to, and as their high-status liars (who are selected for their ability to argue over the colour of poo) engage in their moral pretence, as thousands or millions are slaughtered in their latest genocide, until their takeover goals are achieved.

By using militarily stronger nations to rape weaker nations into submission, our sockmakers can ensure they take control and monopolise the MOE and other resources within any nations that threaten to serve themselves, rather than the greed of our MOE monopolists. As the UN is just another example of our status seekers attempt to feign some kind of value in morality and justice, their human rights are little more than a tool for our sockmakers and their social hierarchies to use against their competitors in the usual hypocritical style they are accustomed to. These practices are rolled out every time there is a desire to demonisea targeted group.

With 27 references to the rights of males rather than all humans, our glorified wrongdoers cannot even escape their gender ignorances when drafting up HUMAN rights. Even after “all men are born free and equal” in Article 1 was changed to “all human beings are born free and equal” (by, of course, a woman), they still could not recognise the other 27 ignorant or sexist gender statements on human rights.

Even though these toothless human rights are as superficial as their creators, if most of us were to put aside our desire to be more-than, stop hating on each other and respect and protect the rights of all, instead of hoping some corporate entity does what we currently won’t do in sufficient enough numbers, we might stand a chance of gaining some basic respect for human life within our social cultures. But until then, these human rights will be like all the other facades social hierarchies champion as righteous, like their enforcers, justice systems, political systems, watchdogs or regulators in order to mask the truth from their contented slaves.

As most social hierarchies only champion human rights when criticizing their competitors and fall silent on human rights when it comes to their own wrongdoings, they will always produce glorified wrongdoers who sell themselves as the saviours of those they wrong. They are constantly creating problems and then offering the solutions to the problems they create, for a price, of course. This very basic form of fraud works well within cultures of greed and is repeated in every field over vast swathes of time, so it looks like we are stuck with the practice for a while. The laws of men are made to make those men rich, so we always end up with rich men’s laws rather than just ones.

Many of the laws of men are vague in order for them to be flexible for those who make them (the social hierarchy), and those of high status within these justice systems who are prepared to glorify wrongdoing, such as judges, are left to interpret their laws as they wish in order to create a multi-tier justice system. Thus, we end up with those involved within these justice systems left to argue over pathetic and ridiculous interpretations of laws for years, decades and generations rather than focusing on any notion of right or wrong. Unfortunately, we will never be short of people willing to argue about nothing rather than get to the point of anything, especially if they are given wealth and status to do so, as it beats working for a living and serves the interests of those committing the wrongs they argue over.

As social status creates a culture where a percentage of us can indulge in our greed and ignorances by giving a few of us vastly more wealth and power than we deserve, those of us who attain these glorified positions can afford to inflate our egos to an extreme. So those who want to be part of the more-than mob must pander to the egos and/or the pockets of these gatekeepers of greed. Hence why those who flatter high-status idiots can gain more wealth and status than those who are vastly more competent, or those who can easily outwork any sycophant. Saying a few words that our hierarchies don’t want to hear can be enough to gain a death sentence, as there is no ego more fragile than one gone unchecked. How a few sounds we make can disturb such fragile minds to the point where they demand death to the sayer, kind of sums up the level of mental weakness of those who make up social hierarchies.

For social hierarchies to gain support for their wrongdoing, all they have to do is declare everyone that they wrong to be a criminal. The amount of “criminals” a hierarchy has entrapped within their justice industries can be a measure of the scale of wrongdoing that any hierarchy engages in, as righteous and even innocent people will always be criminals within a social hierarchy. A religious social hierarchy is just the same as any other hierarchy, but instead of declaring everyone a criminal, everyone is declared a sinner. All sinners and criminals can buy their absolution for the right price, of course, because as we all know, gods and justice love to take other people’s wealth, or at least the men that own and partake in these glorified private members clubs do.

As many wrongdoers experience a form of joy from the pain of others and by inflicting pain onto others, there is always work to enjoy within our hierarchies. If we are of a mind that we desire to commit every wrong imaginable upon others while avoiding any consequences of such acts, then becoming a demonised criminal is not the best way to go about. Pursuing status and wealth will always help to a degree, but by far the best option would be to simply become a part of any social hierarchy or to join their enforcers to achieve such a goal. Taking life is part of survival for all meat eaters, but, of course, there are some of us who take pleasure in harming and killing our own kind as well as other forms of life.

When we must kill to survive, like hunter-gatherers, we could argue that most tend to do so void of any malice and with a healthy respect for the process and the lives that we take to sustain ours. However, when those of us who are too deep in our own self-importance and drunk on the delusions of the self-serving flatterers we surround ourselves with, attempt the age-old craft of hunting in the form of our modern one-sided sport, we get a glimpse into the different mindsets we are capable of when void of any understanding of life’s worth.

The tasteless gloating over a recently killed carcass that we see from status-seeking “hunters” is a stark contrast to that of most who hunt to survive, but that’s not to say hunter-gatherer don’t have their status seekers who do the same, even if it is to a lesser degree. We can observe this difference too when we have different reasons for killing each other.

Those who kill for wealth and status or other unjustifiably reasons (definitions may vary) are more likely to take some form of pleasure in the process. While those who kill for reasons that are more than justifiable (again, definitions may vary) are less likely to take any pleasure in the process and instead view it as a necessity in survival or righting a wrong. Necessity leaves little time for malice, while opulence allows it indulgence.

By producing very ignorant and dependent populations, social hierarchies ensure they have a plentiful supply of glorified wrongdoers who will commit any wrong for them. Acts born of malice, vindictiveness, spite, pettiness, hate and ignorance that harm the innocent are all promoted as righteous and just acts in the minds of those indoctrinated into valuing differing worth and the hate it inspires. We could excuse enforcers to some degree, as they are merely the pawns of their masters, but we are all responsible for the actions we partake in.

However, we should not underestimate the conditioning that goes into producing people who naively engage in mass wrongdoing, while believing they are somehow good. Within differing worth comes a kind of diminished responsibility, by convincing the obedient that their masters are so superior to them that they should ignore their own instincts in favour of obeying their more-thans. This allows many to engage in wrongdoing with the ethos of “just doing my job” to muffle their conscience.

A social hierarchy and their obedient wrongdoers can always avoid self-responsibility for the endless wrongs they commit within cultures that glorify wrongdoing, but assuming we are not so ignorant as to be totally unaware of what we do, switching off our conscience is not always so easy. Although perhaps an elevated lifestyle reduces the difficulty of being overly concerned with right and wrong. By using so many wrongdoers in the process of their wrongs, glorified wrongdoers can convince themselves and others that no individual is totally responsible for their actions, as they are all just following the orders of some great and glorious entity.

As mass culpability is magically transformed into mass diminished responsibility when it comes to wrongdoing within any social hierarchal group, our level of suggestibility plays a role in our ability to engage in wrongdoing, as what group of belongers cannot be convinced to harm or even help others when instructed to do so by those who offer them belonging? It is uncommon for belongers to refuse to comply with their groups, as this would expose themselves to harm from those intent on harming all who oppose them.

When it comes to our modern malicious social hierarchies, where enforcers claim to exercise due process of their laws, even the right to remain silent is not respected. As we would expect for those who use the manipulation of words to criminalise people who have done no wrong, it is in their interest to harm those who exercise this right. When their targets are void of any wrongful act and fail to say the magic words required for their “consensual exploitation”, these enforcers will subject their victims to every wrong imaginable in order to fulfil anything from their own malicious desires to the desires of their hierarchy.

The standard violation of assault and sexual assault, as well as the ever-present practices of belittling and humiliating, are all too common for those who exercise their right to remain silent, as their abusers desperately try to reduce their victim’s status or find some code or law they can abuse to trespass on the rights of those they wish to exploit. With these justice industries filled to the brim with fellow conspirators, it becomes very easy to form a lie or story that fits into the good guy/bad guy narrative they like to use when justifying their wrongs. If enforcers within any hierarchal population spent half the time righting wrongs as they spend on committing them, that society would be a much more just place to live.

Right and wrong can be easily corrupted among status seekers, as they rely on threatening others to agree with their lies. However, a wrong that is accepted by almost all around us is no less of a wrong, just as a right that is vilified by almost all around us is no less of a right. Standing by this simple recognition is rarely appreciated in cults of differing worth.

As our hierarchal police are in the business of theft, extortion, entrapment, planting evidence, trespassing on the rights of others, harming anyone they are told to harm and any other wrong their cult deems necessary to feed the greed of their glorified few, police are not public servants, they are public terrorists, as they are not bound by the laws they pretend to uphold and their main job is to maintain and enhance the wealth and control of the few they serve and pledge allegiance to.

Our hierarchies’ constant war on their masters’ populations creates never-ending vacancies that grant immunity for their slave enforcers to engage in their masters’ practice of glorified wrongdoing. By merely joining such groups, slaves immediately increase their worth as they have agreed to actively perform the wrongs necessary to maintain differing worth, and so affording them a rise in status from an ordinary slave to a more valued one.

The Abolition of Common Sense

In 2021, the International Labour Organization estimated that there are around 50 million traditional slaves around the world, of which around 70% are females, as our predominantly male glorified wrongdoers do love their sex slaves. 50 million is apparently more slaves than at any point in history. So with debt slaves being normalized and an unprecedented number of traditional slaves, the slave industry is booming, hence why our hierarchies are richer than ever before. Isn’t capitalism great? How is that abolition of slavery nonsense looking now?

Historically, when slaves were in no doubt of the restrictions on their basic freedoms, a large percentage, if not most of the population, would have been intimately aware of the mass wrongdoing of the criminals who governed their lives.

The rebranding of traditional slavery to debt slavery, mixed with the superficial carrot of sliding along their social spectrums of differing worth based on obedience, is arguably a more sophisticated form of slavery that helps to convince a greater number of slaves to be content with their enslavement. Slaves that are unaware of being slaves are arguably the most enslaved of all, and are much more productive and much less of a threat to our glorified wrongdoers.

It is worth nothing that the same industry that protected the customers of traditional slavery by declared low-status human beings as their property of high-status human beings, has changed little despite their pseudo-abolition of slavery. Today, the same industry protects the same customers of debt slavery by declaring low-status human beings as indebted to high-status human beings, so in effect just the same old crap.

In today’s master/slave cultures, there are arguably many more delusional slaves who believe they have freedom than slaves who know they are slaves, while understanding the few freedoms they do have is dependent on being productive and obedient to the whims and desires of a few. By convincing their delusional slaves that a right is wrong and a wrong is right, social hierarchies can encourage their slave classes to simultaneously believe they are free, while valuing restrictions on their basic freedoms and the wrongs that are inflicted upon them. With our modern system of slavery, social hierarchies gain much more control over their populations by using a fraction of the effort and expense required with traditional slavery.

All our hierarchies lying industries play their part in conditioning human beings into accepting servitude to the few, and the glorifying of wrongdoers starts when they are very young. Being forced into a decade of repeating lies from those who pretend to be teachers, the daily dose of doom that spews from those who pretend to be journalists, the sickening sycophantism that celebrates the ignorance of differing worth from those who pass as entertainers, and the heavily orchestrated, insincere and pretentious performances from political puppets, all helps to maintain a torrent of lies and propaganda that convince many to value gross inequality and all the wrongs it requires.

Populations that are exposed to such levels of indoctrination are much easier to conform to tyranny than those that are free from so many liars. With no paid liars or teachers, journalists, politicians, scientists or experts (as many liars prefer to call themselves), infecting the minds of a group, there would arguably be far fewer people willing to value differing worth to the level most do today. Our less hierarchal controlled social groups, such as some hunter-gatherers or those isolated from our mass wrongdoers, are arguably a lot less tolerant of wrongdoers than our large populations that are ruled by them, as they are not conditioned to accept all the wrongs being committed all around them in the same way our modern populations are.

When wronged, groups free from the ignorance of differing worth punish their wrongdoers, as is right, but when our wrongdoers have more status and immunity to accountability, it’s a different matter. The oppressed population of a social hierarchy are encouraged to accept the wrongs committed by those deemed to be more-than, and even beg them for assistance when wronged by those deemed to be less-than.

Right and wrong does not change on a daily basis, but this does not stop our glorified wrongdoers using the legal industry to invent thousands of new frauds (or codes, as those in the lying industries like to call them) almost daily. These daily new codes that are mostly just new justifications for corporations to steal from and harm others, are so frequent because it is the business model of governments to use their laws to facilitate human exploitation and sell these self-serving codes to any corporation that can afford them (mostly those our sockmaker owns). The populations of all governments are a resource to be exploited, and they also rent out that exploitation for increased profits. As all policy officers are paid to enrich those who can afford to buy the codes they follow, these policy officers or police officers will harm anyone they are told to by their code loving masters, regardless of right and wrong.

Social hierarchies that have more control over their slave populations have a habit of selling themselves as more lawful or “civilized” than their competitors, who they portrayed as more brutal or lawless for having less control over their slaves. Our more established hierarchies often claim their slaves have more freedom than others, as there is less need to brutalise contented slaves who do as they are told every day without any real resistance to their will, than there is for social hierarchies that are trying to establish their control over a population that are resistant to being enslaved.

So in effect, contented slaves are arguably the measure of civilization. Civilization or to be civil, are terms we use to describe our groups of slaves that are so broken into serving the interests of a few, that they show little or no resistance to their servitude or slavery. What self-respecting civilian does not swell with pride in serving their masters who claim to be or represent the lie or fiction that is sold as their master’s landmass or god?

Civilization is the acceptance of our master/slave societies. It’s now obsolete meaning from the early 1700s of “law which makes a criminal process civil", kind of sums up its ethos of elevating criminality to civility, as well as criminalising human behaviour and human beings whose status is reduced to a civilian. Civilians beg for privileges and civil rights, not human rights, so in effect, privileges and civil rights are for slaves, and something only slaves beg their masters for.

Human rights are only for humans, and arguably no one should need to ask for such a thing, but we are where we are. Civil rights (the rights of slaves) are a good example of how slaves can be conditioned to value their servitude and dehumanization by perceiving some worth in the restrictions and violations imposed upon their freedoms. Slaves ask for rights, while the free exercise them. In any hierarchy, all laws are meaningless, as they have no bearing on the hierarchy or their most obedient minions, thus it is only their slaves that must abide by them.

The Heroes who Harm our Children

There is arguably no wrong we engage in that is as vile as the raping and murdering of children, yet every social hierarchy and their populations accept these wrongs as part of their cultures of differing worth. Of course, those of low-status are branded as criminals and even the more dramatically exaggerated “monsters” for engaging in such acts, but when elevated worth is injected into the mix, these acts are normalized and accepted as part and parcel of cultures that value the omnipotence of glorified wrongdoers. Every community that values differing worth may not be too overjoyed at having their children treated in such ways, but by tolerating and glorifying the wrongs of a few, they invite these acts to be inflicted upon their own children.

As sexually abusing children is difficult to glorify even for our seasoned liars, it is treated like any truth among liars and demoted to a taboo subject. So all seeking to be “valued members of society” must avoid voicing its practice or face the levers of power these abusers hold. With the nature of these wrongs and our hierarchies’ habit of denying the wrongs they engage in, it can be difficult to get an accurate understanding of the scale of how many lives we harm with these acts.

Some investigations on the subject have concluded that from a fifth to almost half of a hierarchal population, have been sexually assaulted as children, with females obviously enduring this fate more than males. We could argue that this is what we are, but within our cultures of differing worth that values abusing others, and where slaves are subjected into a life of unnecessary poverty and struggle, we should not be too surprised that we exploit our children to the same extent we exploit everyone else, when greed is sold as good, and wrongs are sold as rights.

Sex slaves have always been and always will be in high demand by social hierarchies, as sex is the main reason we value differing worth in the first place. Our long-serving traditional slave system, as well as our debt slave system, will always produce a substantial number of sex slaves for those of elevated worth. As all of our hierarchies value human exploitation, they openly normalize sexual exploitation with the acceptance of prostitution, even if they pretend to be offended by it with the pseudo-morality they are so fond of displaying.

As every hierarchy tries to pretend to be virtuous and moral (or as much as they can appear so), they publicly condemn prostitution with their words, while being their best customers and actively engaging in sexual exploitation, as well as every other wrong. As part of their deceit, hierarchies like to credit less-thans with organising their sex slave industries (or adult and child trafficking industry), even when it is their systems of justice, transport, politics, border control and everything else these hierarchies touch that creates and supports this industry. After all, many within our hierarchies are regular customers of sex slaves as well as prostitution.

Every hierarchy is depraved, but they must always publicly condemn the acts they seek to satisfy their depravity. As females and children have less status within our male dominated hierarchies, reducing them to commodities for sexual exploitation is more acceptable among many of our status seeking males. Those forced into prostitution or sex slavery can be easily belittled and even blamed for their master’s cultural desire to sexually exploit others. This, of course, leads to the sexually exploited being targeted and silenced by our hierarchal justice systems in order to maintain the pretence of hierarchal morality and protect their glorified individuals, groups and cultures that demand sexual exploitation.

Those who prostitute their integrity have a habit of looking down on those who prostitute their bodies. Our corporate whores may hold elevated moral worth within our corporate-dominated cultures, but only because they have been convinced to value human exploitation. Whether we are prostituting our integrity or our bodies, we are all victims of our master’s slave trade. When we create cultures that violate our integrity, bodies and many other things we possess, in order to justify our existence to the greed of a glorified few, all slaves become the whores of that few. To belittle and demonise those who refuse to sell anything in exchange for the warped ideals of differing worth is the norm within such cultures. So the self-sufficient are a danger to all social hierarchies, as they have less need to sell their own worth in exchange for the superficial worth any glorified wrongdoer is selling.

This makes our modern hierarchies legalised control over their slaves a must, to ensure their debt slaves are never independent and instead reliant on their hierarchy’s mercy. Thus, the harm they need to inflict upon their slaves is used to coerce consensual exploitation. Our hierarchies’ justice systems that celebrate human exploitation always attempt to legitimise their wrongs in the eyes of those gullible enough to believe they are just. Where once slaves knew they were ruled by violence, today's slaves are encouraged to believe they are ruled by consent, and as long as few ask for explicit consent, the lie can be sold to many.

We are not the only animal to harm and murder their own for sex based reasons, and we are unlikely to be the only malevolent creature to have roamed our planet, even if we do take it to a more extreme level than others. Humans trafficking humans for labour and sex may be done on a scale no other animal can come close to, but our exploitative behaviours are not unique to us, even if our practice of making exploitative laws is.

When one of our groups dominates another, the males of our dominant groups have even created laws that criminalize low-status people for having sex with high-status people. Mostly to discourage low-status males from having sex at all, rather than an attempt to prevent low-status females from having sex with high-status males, as that would kind of defeat the whole point of our more-than male’s tyranny. These laws are, of course, an attempt to ensure sexual access to both groups of females for the more-than male group, while denying access for the less-than male group. A behaviour we share with many animals.

The constant need to make laws in order to violate the freedom of others is never-ending for our glorified wrongdoers. Not so long ago, we had professional drafters who were employed to write legal documents, and they were often paid by the word, so as we can imagine with such a system, it is going to produce documents that have vastly more words than are needed. A practice that still exists to this day, as lengthy legal documents and contracts try to hide their true intent among a sea of words. Our glorified wrongdoers are constantly producing their codes or laws on the conveyor belt of nonsense they thrive upon, in order to maintain and enhance their level of wealth and to trump any rights or laws that limit their income or control.

With their black hole of nonsense that devours every right to justify all the wrongs committed by our glorified wrongdoers, there is no logic or reason that can’t be translated into a wrong or a crime. With most now conditioned to value the nonsense of coerced consent, it is easier for our hierarchies to buy support for their wrongdoing, as openly torturing everyone within a territory to sign a one-sided contract would damage public relations and respect for any social hierarchy (well, among those who have it). So, with the slightly softer method of word play backed by violence or the threat of violence, along with the many systems of deceit, the same can be achieved. Rights and wrongs are universal and never changing, while the laws of rich men change like the wind, with our liars and idiots bending to every breeze.

Wrongdoing is always a very profitable industry. The police and the justice system are among the most prolific thieves in any social hierarchy, as they are paid to steal any property from anyone (the low status in particular). They are incentivized to steal from people by their hierarchy, and rewarded with a cut of the profits from their thefts (as this is a normal practice for hierarchies to buy the superficial loyalty they need from those they give free rein to terrorise people).

As those who claim to uphold the laws of their group merely do the bidding of their hierarchy, policing is reduced to just another racket, like everything else under the racket of social status. The police, like all corporations, are predominantly interested in attaining wealth for their shareholders and themselves, more than solving crimes or righting wrongs. A social hierarchal police force is much like a sales team who are sent out to acquire as much profit for their employers as they possibly can. Those who sell the most cases and bring in the most wealth are the superstars who get promoted, while those who value right over wrong are of lesser worth.

Our glorified wrongdoers have always had their sadistic social score systems, and our modern technological versions are used to restrict their debt slaves’ few remaining freedoms, even more than they already do. This will no doubt get even worse. Privacy has always been subject to differing worth, with those of high status being granted it, while those of low status being denied it, and it is now lost to more than ever before, with spyware embedded in almost every piece of technology and even household objects. Privacy for our hierarchies is a right, but privacy for their slave classes is a crime, and with slogans such as “if we have nothing to hide, we have nothing to fear” being valued by the more obedient and naive of slaves, hierarchies can limit any resistance to their hypocrisy.

The war on plants is another hilarious concept that can only be valued within a society brimming with liars and idiots. Along with many of the incredible ignorances and wrongdoings that many value, this concept is only used for the purpose of passing exploitation and wrongdoing off as some kind of moral activity. The idea that one human being can tell another human being that they are a criminal for using a plant (that humans and other animals have always used) with any degree of sincerity is ridiculous and even laughable, especially when they themselves have used the same plant. If a grown adult wants to digest or do whatever they want to do to their own body, then that’s up to them. But as hierarchies see themselves as more than others, they often think their ignorances have more validity than generations of knowledge, especially if they can enrich themselves with such practices.

Many social hierarchies pretend that their concern for the safety of their population is their motivation behind trespassing on their freedoms, but as their motivation is always greed, this concern for safety is rarely on show for the many that they wrong every day. When these corporate entities and their sales teams come to harass and assault us and order us about, we really should be compensated for our time in the same way all involved within the process of mass wrongdoing are.

Many even have laws that say all should be fairly compensated for their labours, but this would eat into their profit margins if all their victims did this, so they obviously conveniently ignore such laws. Although many who know the game, always ask if a request or demand is a wish or an order, to distinguish between being compensated for carrying out orders or getting nothing for granting a wish. Those involved in the mass wrongdoing are trained to avoid admitting to giving orders, and even their admin teams who send threatening letters to facilitate their thefts and abuses, avoid certain words and phrases too.

The legal industry addresses their intent to steal from us using the capital name (slave name) with the word “MUST” being used instead of “ordered”, in a bid to avoid compensating their victims who carry out their orders. They also manipulate their victims into re-presenting themselves as “YOU”, in an attempt to lower the status of a human to a fiction”. Regardless of the intent of any hierarchy’s minions, they are bought to uphold the lies and oppressions of their owners, and the more effective they are at doing this, the more value they will have bestowed upon them.

Most comply regardless of intent. Righteousness can be a fickle virtue in many of us, as we often view it through a limited perception that tends to be heavily biased towards ourselves. In the same way that many of us can find it difficult to see beyond our time and place, and come to value the injustices and wrongs we live with, but can look to a different time or place where we do not exist and criticize the injustices and wrongs other people lived with and accepted, we often do the same with our own perceptions, especially if we have been stripped of our empathy.

Lying to Ourselves

If we are truly honest with ourselves, how many of us really care about justice or right and wrong? All Social hierarchal systems present their victims with two options: with us or against us, regardless of any kind of morality. So let’s simplify this with an imaginary scenario where we are a social hierarchy that takes 100 people and present them with two options.

Option one:-

To say what we tell them to say and do what we tell them to do, while glorifying everything we say and do, even when they know it to be wrong. In return for their obedience, our slaves are given belonging and superiority over others, with enough social status to have their own slaves. The freedom to travel anywhere at any time, have sex with anyone or anything, and even harm almost anyone they wish without consequence. The wealth to buy anyone or anything, and avoid most persecutions, while having more freedom than the vast majority of slaves can ever imagine.

Option two:-

To reserve the right to challenge what we say and do, while valuing freedom of speech and choice based on the principles of right and wrong. In return for their disobedience, our slaves will have their property and wealth stolen from them regularly, be declared as less-than others, limit their right to travel, be forced to feed the greed of a few, persecuted, imprisoned or even killed if they exercise basic human rights or voice any inconvenient truths.

This may seem like a fictitious scenario to many, but it is the basic principles on which social hierarchies are built on. And as they all wish to hold the monopoly on wrongdoing, it is no great leap to understand that all those who serve them are contributing to mass wrongdoing.

Now, if we are being honest and ask how many of those 100 people would take option one, it is going to be a high percentage. If we take the percentages of suggestibility alone, we could estimate that around 80% of people would take option one. So we could argue that most of us really don’t care about right or wrong, at least not nearly as much as we care about ourselves. This is not to belittle us as a species, it is just a recognition of the differences between what we are and what we often believe we are. In fact, we could argue that the majority of us do value right and wrong, but within the confines of our master/slave environments, most are manipulated or forced to abandon these values in favour of compliance with our glorified wrongdoers.

Whether we are the ones inflicting the wrongs, ordering the wrongs, doing the admin to facilitate the wrongs, tolerating or turning a blind eye to the wrongs, or even just being completely ignorant of them, we could argue that we all share a varied degree of culpability in creating cultures that value them. Thus, it is obvious that way too many of us are willing to get involved in the business of harming others. When we award impunity to any individual, we are encouraging them to wrong others, and when we award impunity to any group of people, we are always creating a culture of wrongdoing.

As every social hierarchy is brimming with “bad guys” who will inflict every conceivable wrong onto others to fulfil their desires to be more-than, all who serve these prolific wrongdoers are, in effect, also the “bad guys”. No matter how many times a hierarchy tells us that we are the “good guys” when we do what we are told, if we are capable of being objective, there is no denying the truth of the actions we engage in while desperately trying to convince ourselves and others that we are harming others for some great and glorious cause. All who partake in serving the greed and base desires of a few will always have to harm others, whether they want to or not. This makes the “good guy” delusion a must for most who wish to hold on to some kind of moral identity.

Thus, the practice of demonising all those we harm in order for us to hold on to any thread of righteousness, is common among our glorified wrongdoers and all who serve them. If we were all judged on the totality of our actions, rather than any amount of worth a few adorn us with, or how much our actions benefit that few, perhaps more of us would be able to recognise a wrong when we see it, never mind when we engage in it. Whether we recognise the way to gain wealth and status within any culture that values differing worth, is to join the hordes of wrongdoers that gain such things from the suffering of others, or we choose to delude ourselves into a perception of moral superiority, as long as we serve such groups, we are aiding, encouraging and proliferating wrongs, meaning we are always the bad guys to varying degrees.

Everything we are lies within us all. A fact that many of us fail to recognise. No matter how we wish to perceive ourselves, we are all capable of ending up within any section of our spectrums (glorified or demonised), depending on our conditioning or even in spite of it. We could argue that there is no such thing as a wrong when exercising vengeance upon those who indulge in the greatest of wrongs, but no human being should ever lose their status as a human being, no matter the circumstances. However, as status seekers love their fictions, titles and awards to wallow in the delusion of elevated worth, the practice of dehumanizing people will always exist within all social hierarchies.

The legal industry thrives on dehumanizing their victims by manipulating people into re-presenting themselves as something other than human, just so they can exploit people in accordance with their glorified nonsense. We can only ever present ourselves, as the concept of re-presenting ourselves as something we are not is ridiculous. But within our social hierarchal cultures, the truth is always the enemy, so their re-presenting lies are given great value in order to allow-status seekers to re-present themselves as something to be revered or glorified, rather than present themselves as the wrongdoers that they are. With a justice system that makes everyone a criminal regardless of wrongdoing, it ensures many avoid engaging with that system, and as a result, many wrongdoers can avoid any consequences for their actions, and so, encourage more wrongdoing. Hierarchal justice systems will always be designed this way to protect their glorified wrongdoers and force their slave populations to accept and therefore encourage a culture of wrongdoing.

Within such cultures, the morally barren sell themselves as morally superior to those with the moral character to do no harm without just cause. Torturing innocent people in order to extract a confession for a fictitious crime and justify abusing or murdering many is a practice our glorified wrongdoers have always practised and no doubt always will. But with the aid of their fluid morality and endless ignorances, our status seekers can always rebrand their wrongdoing as a moral cause. Differing worth and justice do not mix, no matter how many status seekers say otherwise.

We do not have to live in a wrongdoers’ paradise, as we are more than capable of respecting each other enough to resist harming each other in exchange for some perceived wealth and status that is monopolised by a few. Holding everyone in society equally accountable to its laws is one very basic way any social group can achieve a semblance of social harmony, but this will never be achieved while most tolerate the ignorance of differing worth. It always comes back to our desire to be more-than others that holds us back. An inclusive justice system will always be less effective at facilitating mass wrongdoing than the monopolised justice systems our hierarchies enjoy.

Whether we sacrifice ourselves as a consequence of valuing truth and justice, or harm millions of others serving our own interests with lies and wrongs, we do what we do largely due to our environments, the experiences we have within them and our interpretations of them. Many of us mimic the behaviours we observe. Thus, the abused become the abusers, the bullied become the bullies, the lied to become the liars, the manipulated become the manipulators, the terrorized become the terrorists...etc.

The principles of right and wrong are parroted by many status seekers, but there is no such thing within a mind that values differing worth, hence why they stick to their rich men’s laws and codes that cower in the shadows of such principles. If we are honest about our behaviours, then we would recognise that few of us have any real principles, as most of us would rather be the one murdering someone who stands by a principle, than being the one being murdered for valuing any. As long as we don’t have our principles tested, we can all delude ourselves into having them.

All social hierarchies are criminal cultures, as elevating just one individual within any group will always encourage wrongdoing, and we can observe their justice systems going through the motions of protecting one set of wrongdoers while punishing another, to sell the illusion of giving a damn about justice. Even within their criminalized groups, they spend their time locking up one set of wrongdoers just to replace them with another. As these environments support and require wrongdoing, they always need a less-than group to blame for the built-in problems all groups of differing worth create. Thus, the wrongdoing is never a problem, as it is a necessity, while having uncontrollable wrongdoers is the only real problem they face, other than the rarer, more righteous influential individuals or groups that may crop up on occasion.

If we rely on social hierarchies to reduce mass wrongdoing, we will endure it forever. If populations educated and organised themselves to police those in positions of authority, in order to limit and tackle the excessive trespasses on human rights that our glorified wrongdoers commit daily, then they could help reduce the wrongs their communities endure. But those making any such attempt would no doubt find it difficult to avoid being targeted by their glorified wrongdoers. As long as the greed of a few is being catered to, there is no amount of wrongs that will not be tolerated, and no amount of victims that are too many.

Co-operation is much more advantageous to all within any group than conflict, whereas conflict is more advantageous to the few who are protected the most from it, at the cost of the group. Thus, our hierarchies prefer social conflict over co-operation. When wrongdoing comes with consequences, co-operation is encouraged, but when wrongdoing comes with immunity, conflict is encouraged. Hence why our groups that are brimming with glorified wrongdoers value immunity from their acts. The tools and technology of our modern era has finally reached a level that can make co-operation between all within our groups easier than it has been for some time, but as our serial monopolists reduce such tools to a weapon of division and hate, the norms of conflict reign.

With our glorified wrongdoers forever manufacturing conflicts to keep their slaves distracted from the truth, as well as constantly conjuring up new codes to ensure their less compliant slaves have little influence and restricted access to public forums, our hierarchies can swarm the consciousness of their populations with utter nonsense to keep their minds and efforts far from the wrongs and the wrongdoers they endure every day. So the ball and chain of conflict will be tethered to the ankle of human prosperity for as long as the unjust have more worth than the just, and wrongdoers are united, while rightdoers are divided.

Chapter 8

Knowledge - The Enemy of Lies and Hate

The pursuit of knowledge is the pursuit of truth, so never anything our glorified wrongdoers want to encourage their populations to pursue too much. Instead, the desire for knowledge is limited to their own self-interests, and something to be monopolised and controlled in order to serve those interests. This leaves all social hierarchies struggling to acknowledge or even care for all the knowledge within their populations, leading them to succumb to the inevitable fate that comes with glorifying lies and ignorances.

There are few pursuits more freeing and fulfilling than the pursuit of knowledge. The desire to understand everything around us, including ourselves, is something we all share (at least up until we put belonging or status above understanding). There is a vast amount of knowledge all around us, just waiting to be plucked from our environments, and whether we choose to acknowledge it or not, it is always there.

In today’s world, we can only imagine how our species would fare if we ever took advantage of our collective intellect to understand and use all the knowledge nature offers, instead of spending our time grading one another on our hierarchies spectrums of differing worth, where many of us content ourselves with the education industries that our social hierarchies use to morph intelligent human beings into obedient slaves. When obedience to the lies and narratives of the few takes priority over knowledge, the ignorant always have more worth than the knowledgeable.

As social hierarchies require ignorances and hate to survive and thrive, it is no wonder knowledge (truth) is an enemy they must constantly battle with. Thus, knowledge always becomes something to be denied, controlled and hidden in order to create their contented slaves. Our hierarchies industries of hate must take our desire to understand and reduce it to a desire to serve the interests of a few, and much of this is achieved by selling the intelligence ignorance as a reality in order to get as many slaves to value the concept of more-than/less-than human beings.

Knowledge is like precious gifts that we all pick up from our experiences. We all have similar and differing gifts, and we can choose to share our gifts with others or hoard them to ourselves, but within our cults of differing worth, hoarding is encouraged the most. We learn from a very early age the power of the word “why”, as it helps us acquire more gifts. In asking “why”, we receive at the very least some information, and on occasion knowledge.

However, this habit of asking “why” is heavily discouraged within our social hierarchal education systems, as there are many questions they really don’t want their potential contented slaves to know the answer to. So metaphorically grab your pseudo-psychological A+ to F intellectual identity (no E’s please), throw it in the bin where it belongs and let’s wonder down the deceit-infested aisles of the cathedrals of ignorance our social hierarchal education systems call schools, colleges and universities.

Where do we start with this nonsense? Well, let’s first address our intelligence before we get into how social hierarchies bastardise it. As mentioned earlier in the intelligence ignorance, intelligence within any species is barely measurable, void of things like inbreeding, an abnormality or damage to the brain. We are all more or less copies of each other, so our differences are relatively meaningless to very slight. We all have similar brains, just as we all have similar thumbs, but we don’t force our ignorance of differing worth onto how we use our thumbs.

Given the luck of having fully functioning thumbs and brains, how we use them in the way we hold or think will always have a degree of variation, but to suggest that one way of holding or one way of thinking is more than any other way, is largely subjective. It can be argued that intelligence is whatever we want it to be, according to how we choose to define it. And, of course, our glorified wrongdoers define it as being found more in those who obey their will and repeat their lies, but there are many less demented ways to define intelligence.

Let’s say we define intelligence by the ability to exploit others, so one life form with more intelligence than another life form would be able to exploit that life form. Using this definition, many of us may be forgiven for thinking we are the superstars of intelligence, as there are few life forms we do not exploit, but this definition would also mean that bacteria and viruses that exploit us are more intelligent than we are. Although our glorified wrongdoers may value a definition that glorifies parasites. If we define intelligence by the ability to co-operate, then it could also be argued that this makes us as equally intelligent as the microbes that we have developed a mutually beneficial (mutualism) symbiotic relationship with. As we both benefit from each other’s existence.

Many of us may think we have superior intelligence over other life forms simple because we make tools, but if we are defining intelligence based on one particular ability, then we have the problem of defining which ability requires the most intelligence. We are obviously heavily biased towards our “special ability” of tool making, but we could easily argue that any number of special abilities our fellow life forms are capable of are an example of their superiority. Even our special ability of tool-making has a lot to do with our hands (with our opposable thumbs being the superstars) than just our brains, as what good would an intellect for tool-making be without our hands?

If we define intelligence by the number of neurons in our brains, then elephants are 3 times more intelligent than we are, and let’s not even get started on orcas, or we may develop an intellectual inferiority complex. If we use brain size to define intelligence, then we do not even have the largest brains of our human species, never mind among other species, and so we don’t come close to being the most intelligent life form on earth, as there are brains more than six times bigger than our own out there. So elephants, dolphins and whales would be defined as more intelligent than we are using size alone. Our ability and desire to communicate with other life forms is poor at best, but anyone who has spent time with such large-brained animals knows there is a great intelligence there.

We can barely communicate or recognise intelligence effectively within our own species, so we can imagine how difficult it is for us to communicate with other life forms in an effective manner, but maybe one day we can improve our ability to communicate and recognise the intelligence of our big-brained cousins. Who even needs a brain to be intelligent, as living cells have an intelligence within them? If we define intelligence by the mass of life, we could argue that, as plants make up by far most of the biomass of life on earth, they are the superstars of intelligence. Many of us may like to distinguish ourselves from other life forms by our intelligence, but we celebrate our intellectual impotency by the way we organise our social structures based on serving the most basic desires of a few, rather than exploiting our collective intellect, so what does that say about us and our level of intelligence?

Some may define intelligence as the capacity for learning, reasoning and understanding, and we can do this along with many other life forms. So if intelligence becomes defined by what we learn, reason and understand, then we are reducing intelligence to input and the subjective interpretations of that input. If we define intelligence as having the capacity to be self-aware, then who are we to say what life forms are self-aware or not, especially when we can argue that most of us have a very poor sense of self-awareness.

We could define intelligence as the ability to solve a puzzle or a problem, but they come in so many different forms that it would be very difficult to ever accurately grade one form as more complex than another, never mind trying to grade the intelligence required to differentiate between the different forms. Not to mention the desire for participation. Many view intelligence as the ability to recall information or knowledge on request, but this is merely a memory test at best and not an intelligence test. However, this does not stop social hierarchies championing memory tests, as it measures obedience to the repetitive chanting of lies more than it measures intelligence.

Even if we used the speed at which we work something out to define intelligence, we ignore many factors such as familiarity, personality, desirability, curiosity or transferable skills, to name but a few. We could even argue that intelligence is merely the by-product of a life form’s survival programming and serves only as that purpose. In doing so, intelligence can be defined as fulfilling a life forms base purpose of reproducing, but we then have to differentiate between the complexities each species face to grade intelligence. Of course, we could argue that each life forms purpose is to fulfil their abilities within their own particular niche or try to adapt to another, but that’s a whole other subject.

If we define intelligence as the thing we experience when we are not preoccupied with all the things our biology programmes us to be concerned with, then intelligence becomes measured in the amount of “leisure time” experienced. Forcing slaves to concern themselves with their basics needs reduces the time they have to ponder over anything of great meaning, to ever master delight. If we define intelligence by what we are competent in, then when it comes to creating grossly unjust groups, we can declare ourselves as highly intelligent, and when it comes to creating a just group, we can declare ourselves as almost complete idiots.

If intelligence is defined by the actions of a species that aids its ability to reproduce, then we could argue that those who orchestrate most of our wrongdoings are more intelligent, as it helps them monopolising sexual access to more females to ensure more offspring. Thus, our most prolific rapists become the most intelligent of us. Although killing millions to reproduce others is more of an individual aid to reproduction rather than a species one, but that has not stopped many from exercising this practice.

Perhaps we are just not intelligent enough to be able to understand or define intelligence, but we are more than intelligent enough to know the difference between knowledge, information and beliefs. We all possess the intellect and ignorance to accurately and inaccurately understand and misunderstand these three categories, and maybe that is our biggest problem when it comes to us defining intelligence. As we can see, when it comes to intelligence outside of our hierarchies blatant self-serving definitions, it can be a complicated business, as with most multifaceted things. What we can be certain of is that all who believe they are more or less intelligent than others are idiots when it comes to intelligence, but then again, who isn’t?

Anyway, back to our ignorant modern standard of intelligence. With the introduction of compulsory education over the last couple of centuries, social hierarchies have created very obedient populations by spoon-feeding state ideology into the minds of their slaves from a very early age. This allows the master classes to decide and control what their slaves should learn, and more importantly, what they should not, in order to create the most ignorant populations in known history, as far as common sense is concerned, at least. Social hierarchies will always harm their populations if they do not do what they want them to do, or do not say what they want them to say.

So compulsory education is little more than an extension of this oppression, as it belittles and harms anyone that thinks or knows what their masters don’t want them to think or know. Compulsory conscription strips a population of free will by forcing them to kill and die in order to protect or enhance the wealth of a few. While compulsory education strips a population of free will by forcing them to become obedient taxpayers in order to enhance the wealth of a few. Anyone seeing a consistent theme yet? They are both designed to feed the greed of a few at the cost of the slave classes, with one arguably being slightly more abusive in nature than the other.

From Prussia with Love

Compulsory education has its roots in the Prussian state as a way to create a more obedient army and population. This system of indoctrination gained great value among the master classes after their loss to Napoleonss forces in 1806. A loss that was, of course, blamed on their slave soldiers’ desire to live and run from being used in the front lines as cannon fodder, instead of protecting the wealth of their masters, who were far from any battlefield.

Running from a mass death trap or such deluded genocidal hatred is a very common-sense thing to do by any intellectual standard, but social hierarchies prefer their slaves to abandon common sense and die when ordered to, so changes had to be made to rid their population of common sense and any remnants of free will they may still possess. By convincing much of their population to ignore their instincts and accept the dogma of serving the interests of the few over their own, in the way of enforced duty, respect and loyalty to their masters, social hierarchies massively increased obedience to their will and reduced the threat of being overthrown by their slave classes.

Prussia used their indoctrination prisons (or schools) to create a very obedient population who were conditioned to follow orders and to respect and even adopt the ignorance of differing worth, as well as the nonsense of social status that comes with it. Our willingness to be led by idiots is very weak, so forcing ignorances and lies upon their populations is necessary in overcoming this, along with the usual threats of violence, of course.

Those classed as the poor were subjected to the intellectual poverty that these schools celebrate, before being “freed” after enduring around a decade of dogma, and then going on to become a productive slave, in order to maintain their lowly wealth and status. While those classed as the wealthy went on to “higher education” to be placed into positions that maintained their higher wealth and status. Children were freed from the hell of these glorified lying institutions every year in the summer months, so that they could help their slave parents with the harvest, as most worked as farmers to literally and metaphorically feed the greed of the few. The school summer holiday is a practice that still exists to this day. Fewer slaves may work on the land these days, but apart from that, not much has changed.

With traditional slavery, most slaves would be under no illusions of their oppression, and as a result, slave revolts were common and costly for every social hierarchy. However, by also controlling the minds of their slaves rather than just their bodies, it lessens the frequency and ferocity of slave revolts when a population of knowledgeable discontented slaves are replaced or pacified with ignorant contented ones. With the vengeance that a lifetime of cruelty inspires, slaves would often justifiably murder their vindictive masters, sometimes on mass, but with today’s more obedient slaves, the worst that most social hierarchies can expect is a large protest of low-status slaves, who can be easily ignored before they go back home to continue to feed the greed of a few.

With this alone, we can understand why indoctrination or “education” is so important to our glorified wrongdoers. With the French Revolution igniting the worst fears of every social hierarchy in Europe, when slaves did to master what master do to slaves, it is perhaps no coincidence that the rebranding of the slave trade and compulsory education took place relatively soon afterwards. Forced “education” was so important in convincing whole populations into attaching their identity to the debt slave system, nationhood and many other fictions our glorified wrongdoers made up to exploit their slaves with.

Hierarchies have always had schools to indoctrinate the next generation of glorified wrongdoers into valuing the practices that come with those that suffer from the ignorance of differing worth, but they were mostly for the hierarchy and those who could afford to aspire to be part of it. Prussia’s compulsory education system of the masses aided in a mass multiplication of those clouded by the hate and malice required to champion the greed of a few, that results in a more “loyal” population to their glorified wrongdoers.

This arguably played a big role in Germany’s “success” in the wars that led to its unification or adoption of the fictions of country and nationhood, which began their existence in 1871, as well as their somewhat renaissance period of advancement that led to their neighbouring hierarchies feeling somewhat threatened or even envious. As the economic power of Germany began to threaten that of the most glorified of wrongdoers, our sockmakers hierarchies would incite WW1 to halt Germany’s influence (and monopolise their MOE) and ensure the demise of Prussia, as well as other states not too keen on being a vassal. Although the abolition of Prussia would not be official until 1947, after WW2 completed the elimination of Germany as a free sovereign state, and turned it into the vassal state that it remains today.

With every hierarchy recognising the power of Prussia’s mass indoctrination system, it gained widespread use among our glorified wrongdoers. As independent and critical thinking had to be eliminated in order to avoid too many slaves straying from the glorification of their masters, compulsory indoctrination may be a master’s dream, but few slaves would ever be keen to endure a decade of lies willingly.

So, as we can imagine, this may have proven difficult for the first generation of our slave populations around the world, as children would be influenced by their parents who had not been subjected to the same level of forced indoctrination. After one generation of this indoctrination system, many of their slaves will do the state’s job for them in producing obedient slaves in their own children, by repeating and passing on the lies and behaviours they have been conditioned to value.

Breaking Ties – Orphans and Asylums

So, how did we get this first global generation to ignore their parent’s truths and common sense, in order to adopt their glorified wrongdoer’s dogma? Steal children? Kill the parents and steal the children? Force parents to abandon their children? Rape camps where women are “encouraged” to surrender any resulting children to be used by the state, based on some kind of twisted morality?

Use their many genocides to enslave the resulting orphan children into becoming that first generation? Well, no doubt knowing social hierarchies, all of the above and more could have been deployed in the creation of our world of debt slaves, so let’s take a wee peek into this transitional time period, just for the fun of connecting a few historical dots.

The 1800s is a very interesting time in our debt slave history, and even though this time period (like every other) has been heavily doctored to suit the needs of a few. What cannot be denied is the huge, unprecedented number of orphans our social hierarchies were accumulating and selling into slavery or servitude, all over the world around this time. Maybe the child catchers of this time were not as fictitious as some make them out to be. There were so many children being hovered up by social hierarchies that orphan trains filled with children for sale went around the globe from about the mid-1800s for almost a century. This practice was so widespread that it had to be very profitable for all involved, but where were all the parents?

Even with the never-ending wars, the glorification of rape, poverty and poor health practices that can produce many orphans, the vast majority of orphaned children would normally be taken in by family, friends or even neighbours before our communities were destroyed to the extent they are today. So our glorified wrongdoers were obviously up to no good in producing such vast quantities of orphans and profiting from their parentless state. Not much has changed then.

Industries were packed with children to labour for the master classes, and we can only imagine how many of them were used for sex, so perhaps stealing children was a strategy to fill the factories of the industrial age with young impressionable slaves, who would willingly put their own future children into their hierarchies “education systems“, in order to produce that so important first generation of overly obedient slaves. The Lunacy Act and the County Asylums Act of 1845, which led to the compulsory construction of asylums in every county, were used to steal children from their parents by declaring anyone as insane or idiotic if they were not as valued or as obedient as their hierarchy wished them to be.

Even today, in our pseudo-moral cultures, anyone who is perfectly sane and has done no wrong, but is forced into our glorified wrongdoer’s justice systems in order to be fleeced, and refuses to engage in the nonsense of magical words and actions, can still have their sanity questioned, and thus their children stolen from them. So-called mental health experts, who are very obedient to their hierarchy’s will, can be called upon to further diminish the status of their victims, and we know our social hierarchies love to harm people who have the least status.

By declaring the less obedient or society’s undesirable as insane, our social hierarchies can then justify (at least in their own disturbed minds) stealing the children of those newly declared as insane, under the pretence of concern for their child’s welfare. Destroying families is a very common practice for all social hierarchies, so a focus on this could explain the masses of orphans created in this era. And by convincing orphans and the rest of the population that their parents must be mad for even questioning the lunacy of glorifying the horror of spending a lifetime feeding the greed of a few, at the cost of our own existential worth, social hierarchies can ensure that few obedient slaves will believe any inconvenient truths that those branded as insane happen to speak of.

Declaring anyone as insane for speaking the truth is a practice that has always existed within social hierarchies and will never end. Punishments have varied, although prison or the asylum may, for some, be preferable to death, as long as a lobotomy can be avoided. There are few wrongs that those involved within the mental health industry have not inflicted upon those they deem to be less-than, as being granted a monopoly on sanity to declare the sane as insane and the insane as sane, allows our glorified wrongdoers to discredit anyone that voices the truths they need buried.

We only have to look at the way many socially valued people within these cultures of greed are encouraged to win a conversation rather than have one, and view anyone who disagrees with their hierarchy’s lies and narratives as being somehow intellectually inferior, to recognise the effects compulsory education can have in portraying madness as sanity and sanity as madness.

We all have an innate desire to learn and understand, and this is no more abundant than when we are young. This desire can be encouraged or discouraged depending on those around us, but the moment we enter into our social hierarchies education systems, this desire will always be discouraged to some degree as they attempt to steer this desire in a direction that aids their control. Thus making their populations more servile to their masters’ interest at the cost of their own.

Exploiting our desire to belong is just one of the many manipulative behaviours these cultures use in order to blinker their population’s curiosity. Distrusting knowledge and trusting beliefs are also heavily encouraged to steer their victims from the truth. Social hierarchies use their education systems to subdue our desire and vast potential to acquire knowledge, as they attempt to convince their populations that they should instead value their very limited narratives that feed the greed of their hierarchy and encourage obedience to their will.

Within these schools of status and hate, we endure the never-ending monotony of being told useless facts, lies and opinions void of any real context, that we are supposed to recall at a later date, where these very obedient teachers who have been conditioned to believe this is what intelligence is, will declare the intelligence of their students based on this nonsense. Then, for some reason, everyone has their intelligence defined by one test in any given subject at the end of their schooling years. So no matter how competent anyone may have been at those subjects over the course of the previous decade, and if, for whatever reason, their final year does not allow them to focus on these tests, then their previous level of understanding and competence becomes irrelevant.

We won’t even go into our circadian rhythm that requires us to sleep more at the age when we take these tests, as one of the many reasons that underpins this lunacy. We cannot discount the number of people within these systems that understand only too well the lies they are being told to value, and despite enduring these lectures of ignorance for so long, are still capable of using their desire to understand devoid of the ignorances they have been pressured into adopting. But arguably, most fall for the lies.

These end-of-school tests are more about the level of obedience and gullibility of the students. They have nothing to do with intelligence and are, at best, a limited memory test that the majority of students will forget in no time. Then we have the idiocy of attendance intelligence, where these clowns of education decree that those who attend their classes less often than others, are unworthy of achieving a similar level of understanding or competence, even when they outperform those who never miss a class. This attendance based definition of intelligence shows the depth of disinterest in any awareness and understanding within students, and only promotes those who obey their nonsenses, while belittling more competent but less obedient students.

As young children, we are more accepting and aware of our lack of knowledge, so we generally know what we know and don’t pretend to know what we don’t. However, when exposed to hierarchal environments, we can increase our interest in the ignorance of differing worth, leaving us susceptible to elevating our ignorances while denying them. We can struggle to acknowledge our lack of knowledge when conditioned to believe it is a sign of being less intelligent. Thus, too many of us pretend we know more than we do, when we wallow in the intelligence ignorance. Any mind paralysed by the ignorance of differing worth will always handicap its ability to understand.

We all reach the stage in infancy when we question everything around us. The “why years”, for want of a better term, is a crucial time in our development. When surrounded by those who value lies, our “whys” are rarely appreciated, and obedience to liars is encouraged. With our “whys” answered with lies, we can either adopt the lies or accept our need to manoeuvre around the level of manipulation and ignorance possessed by those around us. If we are lucky enough to direct our “whys” at those who value the truth, then we can grow our understanding in the things we are interested in much quicker. But telling the difference between the dishonest and the honest, or the knowledgeable and the ignorant, within cultures that value dishonesty and ignorances, is a challenge we must all navigate.

The why years help us to understand the power that one word can give us in gaining much knowledge, but when adults find their ignorances exposed by one word from a small child, they often add another lie to defend the previous lie, or just attack and belittle the child in a vain attempt to mask their level of ignorance. With the combination of personal attacks and lies being the normal response when merely asking a simple question, many just stop asking questions from the truth sensitive minds they find themselves surrounded by, as the futility of the practice becomes obvious.

By disengaging with their communities in a bid to avoid being lied to constantly, these cultures alienate many within their communities who could otherwise be of great benefit beyond just another prop that is used to elevate a glorified few. As knowledge is always the enemy of our hateful hierarchies, they always try desperately to limit their slaves from gaining any beyond the lies and nonsenses they champion. In our early years, we are highly efficient at learning, though once we have adopted enough ignorances from the lying industries, this efficiency can plummet somewhat.

To teach or to preach? Teachers hand their gifts to others by rewrapping the gifts that were given to them or by sharing the gifts that they themselves discovered. Preachers throw stones at others by picking up the stones of ignorance that were thrown at them or by hurling the stones they themselves found. We are all teachers, and we are all preachers, as we are all guilty of sharing our knowledge and our ignorances. We will all endure many preachers, but if we are lucky, we might encounter a teacher or two. Preachers can teach, and teachers can preach, so the ability to know when one crosses over to the other is worth more than any sockmaker’s shiny qualification.

The best teachers tend to have first-hand knowledge and the ability to pass that on to others in an efficient manner, while preachers tend to repeat what they have been told, while obviously having no first-hand knowledge of what they preach. Ignorances can be easily spread with the aid of preachers in the same way knowledge can be spread with teachers, so within a social hierarchy, teachers are always going to be outnumbered by preachers. Anyone who has experienced a social hierarchal education system has endured this preaching, even if they perceived it to be teaching. The preaching of a hierarchy’s dogma and propaganda is necessary in order to condition their populations to accept and even value the oppressions they experience.

As it is much harder to exploit a knowledgeable population than it is to exploit an ignorant one, all social hierarchal education systems are so awful when it comes to knowledge and excel at championing ignorances and lies. Any good teacher encourages their students to question everything they teach, but preachers tend to discourage any questions that get too close to the truth.

When those who suffer from the ignorance of differing worth and the intelligence ignorance, are telling us what our worth is, we would be wise to ignore them. A decade of preaching can be pathetic and painful for anyone with a desire to learn, as the lessons in lies are so slow and repetitive, and the little knowledge that does seep out from our preachers of differing worth, instead of being built on and progressed, often becomes stagnant at best.

Almost anyone can learn almost anything, but because the intelligence ignorance is so rife within these schools, finding a teacher that understands this is like finding a shadow in the dark. We must bear in mind that most of those who call themselves teachers within these education industries got to be in that position because they were good at obeying and repeating what they were told, without too much questioning. So, as this gave them value, many of them believe that by preaching what was preached to them, should hold value in others. Any teacher of worth wants to be eclipsed by their student, but a preacher more often than not wants to keep them under their shadow. When we study for ourselves instead of others, we can often teach our best student and learn from our best teacher.

To Make a Debt Slave

Our modern-day widespread compulsory indoctrination, or education systems, as our social hierarchies like to call them, played a large part in the transition from the traditional slave system to the debt slave system. Devoid of iron chains, debt slaves need to be conditioned to enter into our glorified wrongdoers forced consent and the harmful contracts they have no idea they are entering into. If their populations were not programmed to identify with a legal fiction that reduces their status from human to slave, then they would not be as easy to exploit by the deceitful legal industry.

So these education systems are vital for the debt slave system as all children are encouraged to identify with their capitalised legal fiction name, and the branding of their masters in the form of a nationality, in order to re-present or magically transform them from a human being to a legal fiction. This way they can be “morally” exploited as adults when they have wealth, labour and chastity worth stealing. Although many glorified wrongdoers have no issue in stealing the chastity of children.

With traditional slavery, social hierarchies have less need to “educate” (brainwash) their slaves into valuing their lies, as they already have total control over them by having them bound in chains, beaten regularly and murdered if they fail to obey. That and slaves are not entitled to own property, so hierarchies always had the right to steal any wealth slaves had. In today's rebranded debt slave system, where slaves are encouraged to willingly feed the greed of their masters, lies are vastly more important in convincing a human being to serve the interests of a glorified few above their own, so our indoctrination into obeying our masters starts early in life.

By using a decade of indoctrination to convince their slaves to accept or glorify their bondage to their masters’ levers of control, our glorified wrongdoers make it easier for them to sell their pseudo-righteousness and morality to a large percentage of their slaves that are willing to buy it from them. Our social hierarchies education systems are always brimming with ignorances and lies that sell the glory and righteousness of their masters, and how every decent member of their society should obey them. There is little let-up on their lies even after a decade in their schools, with their daily dose of doom from all of their media, justice and political systems that are all part of the profiting propaganda preachers who sell any lie in return for another man’s socks.

Hierarchies always like to sell the idea that they are more intelligent than others, and this ignorance often infects the whole of their societies. This is just another element of the constant glorification of the hierarchy that must be maintained to convince their population to accept their servitude to a grading system of human beings. Most who enter these education systems have no concept of some being more or less than others. So this ignorance is imposed on children from the start, with the use of reward and punishment techniques to control thinking as well as behaviour.

As each year goes past, the percentage of children who begin to adopt the intelligence ignorance as well as their hierarchy’s human grading system, grows. We could again use the percentages of suggestibility to gain an accurate percentage of people who leave these schools fully equipped with the ignorance of differing worth.

Hierarchies use terms like intellectuals (even though we are all intellectual) as a way to describe those who are paraded as more intelligent than most, but it is more accurate to describe many so-called intellectuals under a social hierarchy as those who value their indoctrination more than most, while self-congratulatory, suffering from the intelligence ignorance.

These self-proclaimed more-thans value and repeat many lies, and are wheeled out whenever a social hierarchy wishes to validate a lie to their populations by declaring their prestigious liars as experts. Intellectuals and other celebrated more-thans, can be so ignorant of their own ignorances that they regularly slap themselves on the back when they “discover” something that those of low status already knew.

The intelligence ignorance is so deeply entrenched within their education systems, to the point where many are totally convinced of the imaginary vast differences in intellect between those of differing social status, all thanks to the art of preaching. Ask a small child to teach something, and many will show how something works. Ask the same child after a decade of being preached at, and there is a good chance they will have adopted the habit of preaching and unlearned the skill of teaching.

Teaching is, of course, a broad spectrum, but fundamentally, in order to teach, we explain, then we demonstrate, then we practice. It is within this practice that we acquire a first-hand understanding of the subject and where information can be promoted to knowledge. We can skip the explaining part to learn by mimicry, but we can go further still and jump right to the practice part without a teacher and enter the realm of the self-taught.

The art of tinkering or trial and error may not be valued in schools, but as anyone who loves to learn and invent knows, it is of great worth in acquiring knowledge. Within this realm, we can progress at a faster or slower rate, depending on the comparable knowledge and effectiveness of any teacher. If a teacher has a complete knowledge of the subject and has a genuine desire to share that knowledge, then being self-taught can be a slower and more difficult prospect, but how often do we encounter such a teacher who is willing to take the time to pass on any knowledge?

We are much more likely to encounter preacher/teachers whose knowledge and desire to share is limited, not to mention the biases and ignorances of any teacher. So given this inevitability, being self-taught has its advantages. Free from the biases and ignorances of any teacher, we can develop a more accurate or unconventional understanding of a subject that can complement or even surpass the understanding of any teacher or established beliefs. However, this can backfire if we are unaware of our own biases and ignorances.

Void of a teacher with a total understanding of a subject, we can, as students, acknowledge and accept our teachers’ limitations and once we have absorbed their knowledge, we can work with them to try and fill in any gaps. We can, as teachers, recognise our level of understanding and share our limitations to give our students the space to explore any subject fully and the freedom to theorise those gaps in knowledge. But good luck with that in any sockmaker’s school. A healthy teacher/student relationship should work both ways to some degree, as a good student can often teach something to even the most knowledgeable of teachers, and a good teacher never retires from being a student.

There are endless things that can attract our minds’ focus and interest. Our minds’ input and interpretations of the very same thing can vary dramatically in the value and interest we put on them. This is what often leads us to appear so different from one another. We all have different passions, and as such, we learn different things at different rates. Hierarchal schools do not even register this concept, and as a result, they treat every child like some kind of generic robot that needs to be reprogrammed into obedience on a very specific timeline, rather than the complex individuals that we all are, never mind the differing environments we all endure.

Many of us favour mimicry as an effective way to learn, especially in our early years, but there are many different styles of learning. Schools focus primarily on the style of lecturing or preaching, which is arguably among the least efficient ways of passing on knowledge, but highly valued within our cultures of deceit because it is hard to show a lie and easy to repeat them.

The War on Thinking

Creativity, imagination and ideas are all threatening concepts to a social hierarchy, so they have to be constrained in order to encourage obedience to any culture of greed. This promotes the idea that only some special people (obedient slaves) are creative. Of course, we are all creative. Many just never get the opportunity to show it, and even those that do, will not be valued unless their creations comply with the narratives of their hierarchy.

Imagination is essential to our understanding as well as our creativity, so it is no surprise that hierarchies attempt to limit this gift we all share in order to produce obedient adults who will trade their curiosity and imagination for the pursuit of social status. A healthy imagination could lead to children thinking deeply, and they can’t have that. Any child who takes a few moments to think deeply about any of the lies they are being encouraged to value are often dismissed as a daydreamer, or even labelled with the modern affliction of attention deficit disorder (ADD) or its various branches, as is the latest craze in belittling those who don’t value having lies being preached at them.

The art of not listening while feigning to listen becomes a necessary skill for those wishing to avoid the onslaught of lies they face on a daily basis, but no doubt this psychological skill comes (or will soon come) with some mental condition attached to it, with an accompanying patented drug, of course. In ignoring the innate inefficiencies of these education systems, and declaring the children that are forced to endure them as the problem, the cheerleaders for these preacher-heavy environments can absolve themselves of their ignorances and level of incompetence.

Then there are those abilities that many have but are never even spoken of, never mind developed. Like our creative states of consciousness, where we have the ability to create and manipulate our minds in various ways between the external and internal worlds of our minds. Perhaps those who have no first-hand knowledge of such things could argue there is little practical use for these abilities, but they can be a great tool for learning, imagination and creativity.

They are arguably a lesser used frequency we can tune our minds to, and can, for example, be used for doing mathematical equations with ease. However, it is unlikely these tools will be developed within our hierarchal cultures. These hierarchal education systems trade in the dumbification of their populations in order to produce a class system of slaves to serve the greed of a few, obedient minds are rewarded with more wealth and power than critical minds, as the obedient mind is much easier to control. By bestowing a degree of elevated status onto the obedient, the lies they are more willing to repeat have more validity in the minds of those who suffer from the ignorance of differing worth.

We have a great instinct to teach and to learn (some more than others), however, within a culture of differing worth, it is not always beneficial for anyone with a degree of worth to pass on knowledge that others can use to gain the same status or potentially surpass them. This is why status seekers always make the worst type of teachers.

Let’s imagine someone has relatively high status within a particular field or trade and wants to maintain or slide along the status spectrum of their profession. And let’s say they had to train others. If they are competent teachers, then they would pass on their skills and knowledge to others in order to have a more efficient colleague or work force. However, this would give those they trained the opportunity to replace them or even surpass them. So, with the threat of losing their position or chance of promotion, even the most competent of teachers are encouraged to be incompetent in order to serve their own interests within these environments of differing worth.

Discouraging good teachers reduces the efficiency and advancement of every industry, profession and society as a whole, but this is exactly what all social hierarchies do, as they put the interests of a few above everything else. This hoarding of knowledge is, of course, a common practice within our status seekers cults, and helps to contribute to the low level of awareness among all, even those doing the hoarding. If what we know was a puddle, then what we don’t know would be an ocean.

Being aware of our lack of knowledge is the first step in gaining an accurate understanding of our level of awareness. A step we are all more than willing to take as children, but more hesitant to take as adults, especially if we attain any status and fool ourselves, aided by the emergence of our ego, to overvalue our depth of knowledge. There is a student and a teacher in every one of us. We all know much and little of many things and can even learn from those who know little of what we know much of, if that little they know has escaped us in the fog of attaining complete knowledge in any field. Our jigsaw pieces of knowledge are spread among us far and wide, regardless of any superficial status, but by limiting our understanding of anything to the few pieces in the possession of a glorified few, we do little to complete our jigsaws of understanding.

On leaving these education systems, many can find immense joy in casting off the shackles of the less aware that have held them back for so long. To escape their dungeons of hate and be free from their torture of lies, to rekindle their desire to learn, can be like basking in the sun of knowledge after years of living under the dark clouds of ignorance. To share our knowledge with others is, in many ways, an act of kindness. It can even go as far as making the difference between life and death for some.

Cultures of differing worth hate to share, and are far from kind and more about domination and control, so we should not be surprised that knowledge is also something they feel they must dominate and control, regardless of how limited their knowledge may be.

When it comes to social hierarchies, knowledge comes and goes due to the nature of their instability, but timeless knowledge is always there, free from the acceptance of all around us, if we wish to see it. No matter the time or place we exist, timeless knowledge is always relevant, that is to say it does not rely on our existence or ability to recognise or discover it for it to exist, unlike our status seekers lies that try to masquerade as knowledge.

Within our hierarchies, there will always be lies passed off as knowledge and knowledge passed off as lies. Timeless knowledge is always the purest kind, but even this can be reduced to a fiction if it serves the interest of its sellers. As obedience is valued above awareness, we end up with the most obedient getting rewarded with papers or certificates, that tell the hierarchies established industries that these are the people who will serve them best, because they will follow instructions and do what they are told without much thought or fuss.

By allowing the obedient to monopolise influential positions, hierarchies can maximise control over their societies by maintaining ignorances that have served them well, even when this stops or slows down progress. The information we receive from others can be promoted straight to knowledge if we trust the source, but when we know the source is prone to lies, only a fool would trust a single word. Yet many ignore the endless lies that their glorified wrongdoers are steeped in, to value their latest lie. If we trust that everyone will have their own interests at heart, then we won’t go far wrong, but on the rare occasions we are wrong, we can enjoy the wrong more than the failure of being right, so it’s a win-win.

Being wrong about something is something we all do, but when we attach our personal identity to something we are wrong about, then we are more likely to struggle to accept our ignorance. We all make mistakes, and mistakes can be a very efficient way of learning, if we do not repeat them too often. Mistakes can be a wonderful thing, and as long as they cause no harm, they are better teachers than most. It is only our cults of differing worth that sell the idea that a mistake is something those that are labelled as failures do, as another way to discourage learning.

When we separate our self-identity from our emotions, knowledge, views and beliefs, we free ourselves from any fear of being wrong or appearing less intelligent than others, thus allowing us to absorb more knowledge. We all achieve this mindset in our early years of life before we adopt superficial identities or value the ignorances of those around us. Hence, why we consume knowledge so quickly and freely in those years, but we are capable of achieving or coming close to this state of mind at any time in life if we wish.

Avoiding the practice of identifying ourselves with some notion, lie or fiction, can aid our ability to consume knowledge free from the expectations of those mired in such things. The beliefs of all hierarchal cultures are largely provisional, and as timeless knowledge or nature’s knowledge is forever, it will always be denied, hidden, lost and forgotten within such groups. When we are devoid of good teachers, we should turn to nature, as it is the greatest teacher we know. Nature has no biases or ignorances to infect or identify us with, and it is always consistent in its teachings. So if we fail to gain the knowledge it holds for us, it is kind enough to repeat its teachings until we do.

There are few things nobler than the pursuit of knowledge, and few things less noble than its oppression. But these two things collide when knowledge-hungry children meet these education systems that are full of “teachers” who are paid to share their desire to be servile to the interests of a few, over passing on knowledge of worth. As we don’t all get the same freedom to learn, being encouraged to learn form before we can walk, can result in a completely different mindset to one that is actively discouraged from attaining anything but lies. Whether we are from an encouraging environment or not, many of us may find these schools enormously disappointing if we had any notion of gaining knowledge from them.

Schools preach that we must follow the path set out by our hierarchy, and with all of those paths leading to feeding the greed of the few, rather than gaining any knowledge of worth, it is no wonder that many leave with more ignorances than they started with. The paths they encourage are to get a job and pay them for the privilege, start a business and pay them for the privilege or work for them and pay them for the privilege. So basically, all are encouraged to become a productive slave to their masters’ needs and desires.

Modern hierarchies are only interested in encouraging people to pay them in the way of their time on earth with taxation, while those who have no interest in feeding their greed will always be deemed as being less-than in some way. When people have spent much of their lives being told how to behave, how to think, what and who to value or hate, then it can be difficult to break free from that servile mind-set.

We see this when people spend much of their time procrastinating about doing something they really want to do, while maintaining their servitude to others. Populations are conditioned to achieve the targets or goals (normally wealth and status) set by others of elevated worth, so when it comes to their own less superficial goals, many can be less driven, as they become so conditioned to striving towards serving their hierarchies interests of acquiring their product.

When we are not given the freedom to think for ourselves, our ability to do so can become hampered. A “use it or lose it” kind of thing. If we do not allow our intellect to mature, then we are doomed to have much of it guided by others. Cultures that only value an obedient intellect will harm itself, as well as many of those whose intellects differ from the staple diet of obedience and valued ignorances that are used to excuse many to perceive their fellow humans as less-than. This results in schools destroying the potential of many and much of the genius of our species, in favour of the celebration of obedience and ignorance, in order to encourage many to wallow in the idolization of a few.

Social hierarchal education systems, like all PR departments, are reduced to propaganda centres for the corporations that own them. Propaganda and dogma start early in schools to reduce us from the knowledge-hungry beings we all are, to the acceptant slaves of our hierarchies. This and the constant hypocrisy, lies, and contradictory nature of social hierarchies, help to produce sizeable confused populations that are paralysed with enough doubt to reduce their ability to challenge their hierarchies in any meaningful manner. A social hierarchy’s education system is fundamentally taking intelligent children and turning as many of them as possible into ignorant adults, who will become their cheerleaders rather than their critics, as there is always much to criticize.

The illusion of Intellectual Superiority

The IQ test is just another lie that social hierarchies use to convince their slaves that their masters are more intelligent than they are, despite being a complete joke when it comes to measuring intelligence. Yet these cultural compliance tests that are sold as a way of measuring intelligence by many social hierarchies, to justify harming or discriminating against any group they deem to be less-than, holds value among many, especially among the more obedient who unsurprisingly often score higher than the disobedient, but that’s kind of the point.

IQ tests are a product of our cultures of differing worth that have a need to create divisions in their populations, and these tests attempt to justify the gross imbalance in the distribution of labour and wealth that all social hierarchies champion. As they have nothing to do with measuring the intelligence of anyone, taking the test has a lot more to do with measuring the test-takers level of compliance to their hierarchies conditioning after years of indoctrination. These tests simply allow hierarchies to select those less opposed to their cult of wrongdoing, for positions of worth within their cultures, as they are often more likely to go along with any nonsense they are told to.

We have already gone over how difficult it can be to define intelligence and how subjective the process can be, but, of course, our status seekers have little need for any depth of understanding when they can simply declare themselves as more intelligent and harm or kill anyone that disagrees. We may have only been saddled with the nonsense of IQ tests for little over a hundred years, but this is just the latest incarnation of our status seekers’ attempts to convince themselves and their sycophants of their pseudo-intellectual superiority. However, once their intellectual classes catch up to the same level of scrutiny a child’s mind can muster, to expose these tests for what they are, they will invent another idiotic way to polarise the intelligence of those they need to manipulate.

Maths is often used in IQ tests as it is arguably the universal language of nature, but maybe it’s not as universal as we may think. Many take maths for granted as they are taught it from such an early age that counting becomes second nature after a few years, and the obsession with money and constantly measuring each other to try to gauge each other’s worth within a group may go some way to taking numbers for granted. However, apparently, there are some languages we humans use that have no numbers at all, so instead of counting they use terms like a few or a lot. Anyone with a desire for understanding and who has experienced the education systems of a social hierarchy (so any education system then) may know that one of the joys of mathematics is that any hierarchy or teacher’s ignorances and biases have little to no sway on maths.

Unlike their views on the language they speak or the versions of history and reality they are told to repeat, or any of the blatant lies and glorifications they bow to on other subjects, maths is mostly free from manipulation. That’s not to say we can’t create lesser forms of maths and define all mathematics by it, while being ignorant of or suppressing other, more efficient forms. Teachers and others will go on endlessly about what they believe and why they believe it, as if everyone is enthralled by their guessing games, but with maths, there is less of that nonsense.

This is why so many teachers almost despair when they have to teach maths, as they know there is no way of blagging it, unlike other subjects. If someone stated that they believe six divided by two was four, then they would lose credibility on that subject, but if they state they believe whatever lies their masters tell them to believe about any other subjects, then there are always going to be those who interpret their beliefs as truths.

The goals of social hierarchies are always small, as they never go beyond gratifying the base desires of a few. As this is their standard incentive, they are always mired in overvaluing any achievements they claim as their own and stealing the credit for anything their slaves achieve, in a vain attempt to appear as the intellectually superior beings that they try to sell themselves as. All while passing blame for all their own failings onto the same groups they demoniseand belittle. Under a social hierarchy, it does not matter how much collective knowledge we have, as the few has control over whether or not we can take mass advantage of any knowledge. Knowledge will always be viewed based upon how it can be used to serve the interests of a few, not all.

If any knowledge threatens a hierarchies control or wealth in any way, it will be denied, criminalized, suppressed or belittled until the hierarchy wrestle control of any new knowledge or technology that can emerge from that knowledge, and monopolised it as their own. Sharing knowledge or ideas all becomes rather pointless within these cultures if we have little interest in wealth and social status, so we lose out on all that potential in exchange for some of us being treated as more-thans on the sliding scales of worth that is measured in wealth and status. Knowledge allows us to see the wonder in everything, but with our ignorances, we blind ourselves to that wonder, so our social hierarchies much prefer to deal with an intellectually blind population who can only see wonder in their masters and their minions.

Our bullying cultures now pretend they are anti-bullying, and the practice of adding the word “anti” to the behaviours of our glorified wrongdoers and their minions has become a common method to convince the most gullible of slaves that they live in some kind of moral society. These societies that manufacture gross poverty create pseudo-anti-poverty groups to go through the pretence of wanting to end poverty.

We have these hateful cultures creating anti-hate groups, organised criminal cultures creating anti-crime groups, fraud cultures creating anti-fraud groups, rape cultures creating anti-rape groups, terrorist cultures creating anti-terrorist groups…etc…etc. It is a wiser practice to put the word pseudo in front of most of the things our glorified wrongdoers try to sell as moral or just. It works the other way too, as anti-democratic groups create pseudo-democratic groups, anti-justice groups create pseudo-justice groups…etc…etc. For some, being told what to believe is enough to adopt a belief, but for others, seeing is believing.

Hierarchal school teachers are one of those professions that all social hierarchies glorify to some degree (as they are paid to sell their hierarchy’s lies), even though many of our teachers have a history of harming children, and still do. When it comes to bullies and bullying, schools are just social hierarchies nurseries, where these teachers’ belittling behaviours and bullying are an integral part of them. Thus, teachers are the worst and most prolific bullies in any school, as they are paid to enforce the will of their hierarchy onto the next generation, in order to prepare them to value the bullying and disrespect they must endure within their society.

Teachers, as among the first of many bullies that most living under a social hierarchy will encounter, use many tactics to persuade their students to value obedience to their hierarchy. Lies are, of course, a standard practice, but guilt, shame and fear are all encouraged within these human grading camps, as well as violence, of course.

Hierarchal teachers (as well as the wider society) encourage children to adopt their ignorance by grading their fellow human beings based on the array of ignorances their particular hierarchy champions. Once the more suggestible children have adopted the more-than/less-than ignorances, then they too can adjust their behaviour to mimic the adults around them, by belittling, ridiculing and bullying those they have been taught to view as less-than.

The level of disrespect this type of behaviour encourages can lead to the same violent outcomes in children as it does in adults. All social hierarchies are disrespectful to their entire populations, as they try to manufacture a superficially glorified, enhanced form of respect for themselves, while degrading all around them. So we can understand the need for this widespread abuse of our children’s intellect and bodies within these cultures’ schools. Some of those who call themselves teachers have committed every wrong imaginable on the children in their “care”, from name-calling to even going as far as killing them, if their status is less-than enough.

Some teachers are not above exchanging grades for sex with their students, but whether teachers are inflicting emotional, sexual or physical violence upon their students, and despite their wrongdoings, most will be praised simply for being a part of their hierarchy’s glorified lying industries. Even cultures that somewhat understand the immense harm caused by justifying violence against children for no reason other than petty infringements, and have gone to the bother of making a law opposing needless violence against children (Yep! We really need a law for this), they still have their fair share of violence towards children.

Teachers, like all of us, have their flaws and ignorances, and teaching intelligent human beings a bunch of lies can be a difficult profession. There is no need for the unnecessary violence aimed at children who don’t perform as desired within any world where all are equal, but it is necessary within these cultures that glorify wrongdoing and differing worth, and in conditioning and forcing people to accept the gross injustices they will experience throughout their lives. As teachers themselves are largely the obedient children of their generation, they may lack the level of insight or understanding required to teach different people effectively.

There are some people who are great at teaching but have no interest in pandering to their hierarchies ignorant understanding of intelligence, so they will never be able to become a school teacher within any such culture. While some who are awful at teaching can qualify as a school teacher by glorify and repeating every lie they are told and demonizing the truth. With the prolonged indoctrination that comes with becoming a hierarchal educator sold in the form of higher education, most teachers are encouraged to attach the intelligence ignorance to their personal identities, and this can cause them to interpret a child’s perfectly reasonable and benevolent questioning as a personal attack that often leads to the level of malice that many teachers display to those that question what they won’t.

Higher education is little more than a gateway to higher wealth and status, as well as gaining access to the social circles of the more-thans. This allows some of us to wallow in our manufactured superiority while ignoring the reality of the controlled environments that elevate some and diminish others.

The superficially elevated intellect of our obedient slaves helps their masters to rebrand our master/slave cultures, to sell their grossly unequal relationships as superior/inferior, employer/employee, educated/uneducated, manager/worker, leader/follower, or whatever term is more palatable to our glorified liars in their grading systems of human worth. With extreme inequality a mainstay of social hierarchies, the rich can buy their hierarchies bits of paper or certificates that declare them to be intelligent enough to be of more value than those who cannot afford them. This farce allows the more-than classes to fool themselves and others into valuing their contrived intellectual superiority.

Certificates may be these magical bits of paper that are used to “certify” whatever lies those handing them out wish to declare as true, but in cultures of differing worth, such lies will always have worth. Even many of those who are deemed to be of low intelligence within these cultures of social status can come to value much of the lies and ideologies of the hierarchy that oppresses them. It is as if, after almost a decade of having nonsenses drummed into their ears, at some point between infancy and adulthood, most have just decided it is easier to go along with the lunacies of their time and place than it is to challenge them. And who’s to say they are wrong? Perhaps when confronted with people who believe they are more intelligent than others, we should be kind and humour them, as they are just unaware of their own ignorances.

Common Sense - The Intellectual’s Nemesis

Social hierarchies use the term intellectuals as a way to describe those who sell themselves as more intelligent than most, but it is more accurate to describe many intellectuals under a social hierarchy as those who value their indoctrination more than others, as well as suffering more than most from the intelligence ignorance. These intellectually glorified “intellectuals” are sold as experts in their field, well, right up until they speak of any inconvenient truths that expose their hierarchy’s lies at least, and then they are decreed as some kind of charlatan that never knew anything in the first place.

The intellectually glorified are used to fill positions of high-status, in an attempt to convince their populations that only special people can attain such positions. The lying industries like to collect these intellectuals in order to add some kind of validity to their nonsense. The education, justice, media and political industries embrace any liar willing to repeat what they are told to, with the political industries in particular cherry-picking the best liars for themselves, as they always have the most need for them.

Once infected with our superior intelligence ignorance, we can struggle to accept that we can be wrong about almost anything, especially within the field of our worth or when in the presence of those we believe to be intellectually inferior to ourselves. The danger of having the idiots of our hierarchies intellectual classes believe they are intellectually superior to anyone, never mind most, is that they are more capable than most in taking one truth or even a notion of a truth, to build their idiotic ideologies on. Especially with the encouragement of many who suffer from this socially superior ignorance to the same level. No matter the social hierarchy’s time or place, we can observe these idiotic ideologies and the value their hierarchies put upon them.

With social hierarchies using their elevated intellectual classes to prop up their cultures of glorified wrongdoing, there is always the repetitive hilarity of stating the bloody obvious as an intellectual “discovery”. This is repeated among intellectuals time and time again within these groups that suffer from the delusion of intellectual superiority. Even with our basic behaviours, they rebrand common knowledge to a difficult intellectual puzzle, that only the superior minds of this class can solve, as they declare that they have discovered some great revelation in our social behaviours (or what some call sociology), among other things, that was always abundantly clear to most unaffected by the intelligence ignorance.

Our hierarchies’ intellectuals do love their political melodramas. Students are taught to value their political systems, whatever they may be, and our modern standard glorifies the mere act of voting for a new CEO of … (Insert bordered territorial fictitious corporate name here) every few years or so, and sells it as some great display of democracy, when it is only an exercise in the power of years of consistent brainwashing. Candidate X or candidate Y are only in the running because they are more often than not, part of the right private members clubs that only accept those willing to do what they are told, more than they are willing to do what is right.

As so-called higher education is a breeding ground for a social hierarchy’s best liars (who can be used to sell their lies to the next generation within their lying industries), we will never be short of glorified liars. Higher education encourages their students to aspire to gain elevated worth within their master/slave cultures, in the sliding scale of master roles, leaders or the management classes as they prefer to call them.

Fragile superficial pompous leadership that cannot accept criticism and relies heavily on bullying and censorship, becomes something of value, rather than the more natural forms of leadership that can more than withstand a few truths. Censorship is a hierarchy’s friend, as it is just another form of deceit and a glorified way to deny the truth. One group of adults telling another group of adults that they are unequipped to know what they know is ridiculous, but necessary in creating a culture where some adults can exploit and control other adults.

Social hierarchies control their education systems to the point where they are nothing more than brainwashing camps, aimed at dividing human beings into differing levels of exploitation, where knowledge is the enemy and not the goal. The practices of exclusion and division are exercised, just as it is in their wider society. This conditions people to be more accepting of the fractured communities they find themselves in, as excluding most from society allows a few to monopolise it.

The concept of slavemasters has become unfashionable and is now instead sold as leaders, managers, bosses,…etc. The practice of the master classes walking into positions that they are highly incompetent in, glorifies inefficiency and incompetence in every field they infect. Hierarchies condition, train or educate those decreed as more-than, to champion servitude to their hierarchy in order to encourage others to adopt the same ignorances. Those of high-status, or status seekers, who attend these various levels of mini-master-making (leadership or management) schools, are more often than not learning the skills of human exploitation, or the more palatable terms of manipulation and controlling people, more than they are about how to lead any field or industry.

Studying the art of being a slavemaster changes little over time, with adopting the Jekyll and Hyde personality being a must. Belittling, lying, excess volume, violence or the threat of harm and violence, winning a conversation rather than having one and stealing credit while passing blame, to name but a few of those arts, and the dehumanizing of their fellow human beings, of course, are always among the lessons of master making. Although the number one lesson they must all take on, is the art of kissing the ass of those who claim to be more than them. An art all good slaves (but ideally all slaves) must also display.

This nonsense works best on people who have been primed for exploitation, as most are today, simply by restricting their freedoms and inflicting poverty upon them. By manipulating language, many no longer see masters exploiting slaves and instead see “enterprising hard-working individuals forming large corporations that benefit economically challenged people by giving them jobs”, and this nonsense is what many are encouraged to pass off as leadership.

With management school now a standard for any aspiring master, our glorified more-thans are taught how to manage little more than lies, and those they targeted them at. The best kinds of managers or leaders are those who have more understanding than most about their field and can pass on that knowledge effectively and honestly. Well… the best at least outwith our hierarchal versions, as far as creating a high degree of efficiency is concerned, but not so great in championing the greed of a few.

By allowing those of status or those seeking it to walk into positions of control based purely on the ability to manage slaves, rather than any level of understanding for any field or industry, we get these industries and fields that become highly incompetent, inefficient, and so very wasteful on many different levels. The vastly closer to a natural form of leadership that comes with time served competence is far more productive and efficient, as well as helping to create a much more harmonious social environment than entitled leadership. However, social hierarchies are never fans of harmonious social environments.

As what social hierarchies term as “higher education” is little more than a reward system for the most obedient slaves (who are expected to go on to work in less labour-intensive positions than their disobedient counterparts), many overvalue obedience over much else. With more wealth and social status on offer regardless of the level of social contribution to those that pander to and serve gross inequality and injustice, higher education can attract many who seek to be seen as more than others, or at least wish to be seen as more than they believe themselves to be. Social hierarchies churn out their political masters or leaders who love their meaningless speeches and slogans, and “Indoctrination, indoctrination, indoctrination” is not exactly the slogan that will be championed by any politician trying to win public favour as they pretend to care about creating a knowledgeable population, but it would be a more honest slogan than “Education, education, education”.

Speeches are always the preferred medium of communication between oppressors and the oppressed, as they lack any meaningful exchange and only highlights the interests of the oppressor. We won’t descend into the endlessly rehashed drivel of political speeches or slogans like “make X great again” or the timeless “change”, but education is always there or thereabouts when it comes to gaining public favour for our modern social hierarchies puppet political leaders. Different hierarchies deploy different methods to sell their shrines of propaganda as temples of knowledge.

Most (if not all to some degree) use the standard controlling practices all social hierarchies love to use, but for puppet leaders who are paid to sell a system that churns out more-thans and less-thans instead of knowledgeable human beings, it can be a tough sell. Yet luckily for those tasked with convincing any population into valuing mass wrongdoing and the dumbification of their children, these political systems allow the constant recycling of “leaders” to ensure no one individual has to stick around long enough to take responsibility for their deeds before they are moved on to a cushier number, as a reward for selling their masters’ lies. This allows each new puppet to simply blame the previous puppets for the poor standard of education, while they themselves continue with the same standard. So every generation of good slaves blame the puppets and never their masters.

With social hierarchies’ slow progress in every field, they are only truly valued by those that profit from them. When we combine this with their practice of destroying anyone that threatens their lies, it makes having a quality education system almost impossible. The best these social structures can hope for is dividing their education up, in order to ensure less-thans receive more lies, while more-thans can be given some truths.

By using their default mode of encouraging division and isolation, social hierarchies can exert a level of control on the knowledge they share with their populations, while still getting to use a smidgen of their collective intellect to serve their own selfish interests. Cultures that value the sharing of knowledge would obviously aid every preceding generation, but for our cultures of differing worth, this would also reduce their ability to exploit people in the way they are accustomed to. Every industry exploits the lack of knowledge their populations have in order to profit from the manufactured ignorances they are encouraged to value. In many ways, the largest manufacturing industry within such cultures is the ignorance industry.

Within the cauldrons of ignorance that we call schools, where even the basic joy of thinking is discouraged, as thinking is rebranded and demoted to a disorder or daydreaming, we and our children must shed much of what we and they are. By promoting the mere idea that if any child takes the time to think about or dares to challenge any of the lies being presented to them, as a problem stemming from any child, those who peddle in lies can have their malice glorified.

Any such child must be bullied or belittled by the liar (or teacher, as they prefer to be called), in an attempt to validate the lie at the cost of the child’s worth within their group. As thinking is discouraged within our cultures of deceit, we endure many who gave up on the practice in favour of social acceptance and a degree of elevated worth, who often use all kinds of tactics to encourage many to follow in their footsteps down the path of blind obedience.

Junkie Students

Belittling and praising, condemning and awarding, dividing and uniting, harming and helping…etc., are all part of the repertoire of all manipulators, liars and idiots alike. With our health and drug industries monopolised like every other, many children are encouraged and even forced to take harmful drugs in an attempt to eradicate very human reactions and behaviours to the nonsense these education systems mire themselves in. With many, but the most obedient, now having some kind of disorder or condition attached to them. Those who decree these phantom “human brain diseases” conveniently have their expensive remedies for every disorder or condition they wish to create. Drugging children for being human may allow hierarchies to subdue those not too keen on their lies, and profit hugely in the process, but it is an awfully cruel way to treat our kids, just to feed the greed of a few.

With much of their population fully indoctrinated and stripped of their free will, empathy and critical thinking, in favour of obedience to anyone with more wealth and status, hierarchal schools ensure they have plenty of obedient slaves to fill their enforcer groups. People who will do as they are told before even thinking about the whys of the actions they commit, are every slavemaster’s dream.

As hierarchies rely on the dilution of responsibility that allows so many to engage in excessive wrongdoing, by all playing the parts they are told to play in harming so many of their fellow human beings that helps to sell their masters a degree of plausible deniability, doing what a perceived more-than has told them to do, is often a good enough reason for most indoctrinated into differing worth to abandon reason, justice and even basic human decency. Our hierarchal enforcer’s uniforms may change from time to time and place to place, but those who wear them don’t.

As hierarchal education systems must produce believers, as opposed to knowledgeable people, anyone can preach a belief void of knowledge, but any good teacher who is willing to share knowledge will struggle to sell beliefs that contradict their knowledge, making teachers less valuable to any hierarchy. A society of knowers will never be as accepting or as willing to engage in mass wronging, to the same level as a society of believers.

With most of us falling under the umbrella of belonger, many of us will accept any dogma that is thrown at us to varying degrees, but many will also understand they are being lied to day-in-day-out, and that can be difficult to endure. It can be difficult for children who know a lie when they hear it, to get through the days, months and years of dealing with other people’s expectations of valuing the absurd nonsense and lies that are always sold as knowledge within these cultures. Anger, frustration, despair or even bewilderment in the level of value given to the nonsense that unfolds around them can be common among those who are only interested in knowledge.

This often results in disengagement and disinterest in anything these schools have to offer. Teachers can be ill-equipped to deal with those who understand the difference between knowledge, belief and information, and have the ability to recognise the lies that they themselves cannot. This often leads to such children being stigmatised as less-than, even at such an early age, by those who masquerade as teachers. Instead of attempting to understand the reactions of those who know they are liars, many teachers who are immersed in their own ignorances, view those who put no value on such lies as the problem in order to avoid questioning the lies they are trying to sell.

Our children come up with various strategies in an attempt to maintain a degree of sanity while immersed within the extreme level of ignorance at school, and even at home if their own families echo the ignorances they know to be such. For example, mumbling or a reluctance to even talk, for many children, can become a tool to humour the ignorances of adults who don’t want to hear any inconvenient truths, their worth is built upon. Any child who knows that the system they have been subjected to is useless for what they wish to learn, can use various methods to limit or avoid having to engage with those who offer them only ridicule, ignorances and little to no knowledge.

Traits are monopolised by those who feed the greed of the few, in a bid to elevate and belittle in accordance with the dogma of superficial success. Only people who pander to their hierarchies parochial understanding of success are tagged with traits such as driven, focused, ambitious, dedicated,…etc., while those who fail to strive towards the superficial goals of feeding the greed of a few are declared as having none of these traits, in a bid to sell the more-than/less-than ignorances. We could argue that many among our populations of debt slaves are driven, focused, ambitious and dedicated to minimizing their involvement with our glorified wrongdoers and their systems of oppression.

The mere idea that there could be people within their disparaged groups that have no interest in the superficial goals these cultures champion, while being more than equal to any within their glorified groups, may barely enter the minds of our status seekers, but that does not make it untrue. Despite the pressures to adhere to these glorifying and demonising hypocritical cultures, many still emerge unscathed from the shadows of hate and ignorances without adopting their hierarchy’s desired mentality, and knowing full well the consequences they are exposed to in doing so.

Declaring anyone who agrees with us as intelligent and those who disagree with us as unintelligent is a very immature and egocentric way of defining intelligence, and shows the level of psychological maturity that most status seekers descend into. But this is the basic principle that our social hierarchies use to define intelligence, as it fits well into a culture governed by lies and ignorances. To control the desired narratives their populations come to value, hierarchies limit the voices that their populations hear. Obedient human beings are reduced to just another brick in the wall of ignorance that our glorified wrongdoers can hide behind.

As these defenders of greed are promoted as experts and rolled out in an effort to legitimise any lie (to the point where anyone who has not been indoctrinated into the glory of greed, and lacks the glorified papers to have any kind of worth, is automatically dismissed as unqualified to possess the ability to understand anything), our hierarchies can convince their obedient slaves to value obvious liars over anyone exposing an obvious truth. The gender as a concept lie is just another recycled example that our glorified intellects are instructed to champion in order to belittle the truth and common sense, as well as those that share it.

As elevating the worth of a few over others requires so many lies, convincing many that the truth holds little worth is a necessary practice for all social hierarchies. Hoarding knowledge and restricting the sharing of it is something all social hierarchies do in order to give themselves an advantage over others, as status seekers and even young children know this practice is great at exploiting others with.

There is almost an innate pleasure many status seekers experience at the mere idea that they know something others do not, especially if it is a manipulation they directly benefit from, but even when it is merely gossip, it can be enough for many to perceive themselves as special in some way. It is perhaps no great surprise then, that what they pass off as education is little more than what they want a good slave to believe. Our hierarchies’ education systems are the recruitment grounds for their cults of differing worth. When lies are the lessons, our hierarchies educators have to be selected for their suggestibility to lies, while weeding out those who value the truth, as they run more risk of challenging their lies.

Most of us want the best for our children, but within our cultures of greed, too many of us are happy to achieve this at the cost of others. No point in being more-than if there are no less-thans to exploit. The pursuit of knowledge may be a noble thing, but for status seekers, it is just another tool to be used for exploiting others.

Slave School Master School

Social hierarchies predictively have their varying levels of worth attached to their schools. The slave classes have schools to train them to be good slaves. The middle or aspiring glorified wrongdoer classes have schools to train them on how to look down on some, while being subservient to others, and the glorified wrongdoing classes have schools to train them how to justify, glorify and mimic the actions and behaviours their parents’ engaged in. The latter is where many of those who prefer to call themselves “world leaders” are chosen to be placed into the puppet positions our sockmakers have established. Selling the idea of working hard to attain a fraction of our wrongdoers’ wealth within our sockmaker’s utopia is nothing more than a pep talk for slaves, as those who risk the most gain the least reward, while those who risk nothing gain the most.

By discouraging people from developing their critical thinking in favour of obedience to lies, many become oblivious to reality, as they allow themselves to be spoon-fed narratives and lies their masters wish them to value in order to facilitate mass exploitation. Once this state of ignorance has been reached, it can be difficult for reason and logic to have any kind of impact on the altered perceptions of our more obedient slaves, but on the upside for them, they will have more status within their cultures, as liars and idiots are always very useful to our glorified wrongdoers.

As long as we glorify our status seekers, knowledge will remain something to be hidden and monopolised, instead of shared and developed. Hierarchies differing levels of education that are given to their slave and master classes respectively, is an example of how they attempt to hoard knowledge for those who are of more worth in their eyes. We see this type of mass hypnosis to obvious lies time and time again within such cultures that have been conditioned to value what they hear, over what they see and even what they know.

High-reward/low-effort jobs are reserved for those who value and aid their glorified wrongdoers, while low-reward/high-effort jobs are reserved for others, especially those who don’t value or wish to aid the glorification of wrongs and their doers to the same level. The deliberately poor level of knowledge sharing, combined with the grading of social worth based on elevating and lowering the perceived intelligence between the obedient and the curious, allows all social hierarchies to ensure that most in their populations are conditioned to believe their time is worth less than that of the more glorified. With all social hierarchies in need of obedient slaves, this mistreatment encourages most to become exactly that.

As the intellectual classes within our social hierarchies are predominantly used to support their hierarchies lies, many attempt to sell themselves as intellectually above the snake pit that is hierarchal politics, where most jostle to be their master’s favourite pet. From the lowest management position to our sockmakers aids, all must flatter and berate in accordance to the superficial social grading that their tools of worth can buy. As such, glorified minds are perceived to have more of an understanding of almost everything over the devalued intellects of others.

There is an array of elevated language, fictions, ignorances and lies that they are expected to regurgitate whenever confronted by their perceived less-thans. By miring anyone who is prepared to listen to them in their overly complicated nonsense, the truth can be avoided to a large degree. The forever obedient intellectual classes can be wheeled out whenever a social hierarchy needs to sell a lie, event, war or orchestrated disaster, in order to convince as many as possible of the lies they are trying to sell.

When sharing valued ignorances grants us social status and sharing knowledge grants us harm and death, a large percentage of our social hierarchal populations are destined to remain as ignorant as their hierarchies wish them to be. These experts are revered as a kind of word of a god on any subject, as long as those words align with their hierarchy’s narratives, of course. The idea of an expert as someone who knows all about a subject is one that many value, but the reality is that few if any such people exist.

Many who claim to be an expert do so based on the average understanding of their field, and some have often just given up on gaining more knowledge on a subject in the belief they have a total understanding. Some of us will always have more knowledge than others on different subjects but as with most things, complete knowledge of any field is almost unachievable when viewed through a mind mired in differing worth, especially as our status seekers are mostly just content to appear to be more knowledgeable than others. Using comparable knowledge can, of course, be effective at measuring differing levels of understanding among any group, but when malice is our standard, we often just use this for exploitation.

Our hierarchies anti-knowledge education systems helps to create the malicious idiots they require to grow their empires of hate. Remaining ignorant of our status seekers level of wrongdoing, may gain us a degree of wealth and status over others, but by championing our ignorances at the cost of the truth, we tolerate an impoverished mind. Although for many, this will always be an acceptable cost to having our base desires met.

As we would expect from groups governed by status seekers, individual achievements are celebrated and glorified, while all who play a role in any perceived or real achievements are ignored in favour of elevating the worth of a few. Many of those who claim the credit for others work, often rebrand themselves from liar and thief to ambitious and successful, in order to glorify their actions and hide their malice. This practice leads to our status seekers evoking their habit of monopolising words to attach ambition solely to their behaviours, over that of the more benevolent among us. In the minds of many of our status seekers, there can be no such thing as ambition in those that do not seek wealth or status.

To brand many people as unambitious if they lack the same level of obsession over the many fictions our status seekers prize so highly, may reduce people who put no value in their fictions and lies to less-thans in the minds of many status seekers, but such perceptions can mean little to those who have less malicious ambitions. People who achieve their goals every day, outside of any hierarchies malevolently restricted “ambitions” that are attached to elevated worth, can be somewhat philosophically confrontational for our status seekers, who are conditioned to continually strive to jump through every hoop their masters put in front of them in order to attain such perceived elevation.

Obedience and flattery may be promoted to drive and ambition for those willing to adopt their hierarchy’s lies, but if we all define the things we do as achievements, then we are all high achievers, as we all do what we do, but how much value or worth we attach to what we do is subjective. As our hierarchal education systems attempt to limit the ambition of all who endure them, such “ambition” is sold as something the slave classes should value if they wish to free themselves of their masters’ wrongs, to at least some degree. As long as slaves obey their masters will at the cost of their own, perhaps, maybe, possibly they too can one day be special enough to live free from the same level of persecution that many experience for not valuing their master’s definitions of ambition.

By promoting the “highly educated” (or highly obedient) into positions of high social status, we are domesticating human beings in the same way we do with other animals, into yielding to the interests of their masters. We reward those who are docile and obedient with the right to breed the next generation of slaves, while culling the less obedient who respond more aggressively to enslavement. There are many practices that go into achieving the passive populations that all social hierarchies dream about, but nothing is more effective in achieving servility than controlling what a population thinks.

As more-than schools (where the next generation of puppet leaders graduate from) place the obedient into influential positions around the world, to “lead” in the manner they have been told to, they ensure longer reigns for our shadow empire of hate. With the limitations greed and self-interest impose upon us, these “leaders” confine their groups to the stagnation of every field they touch, as they wrap their ball and chain of malice and incompetence around progress, in order to maintain the master/slave cultures they have come to value. Having their name put into their masters version of history, alongside the other glorified wrongdoers they are told to admire, is often a motivating factor among each new generation of overvalued wrongdoers.

Our sockmakers’ education systems have whitewashed their prime role in all the wars and wrongs they have incited over thousands of years, to control our mediums of worth (as we would expect from those who had to engage in prolifically evil deeds to now own everything and everyone). Within cultures that rely on the ignorance of differing worth, hiding our wrongs from our victims to glorify inequality and injustice is just one of the perks of owning the controlling mediums of information and indoctrination. Few good slaves dare question those orchestrating the lies these schools are told to sell in their curriculums, and when we allow a few to own our systems of sharing knowledge, then the few can dictate what knowledge is shared and what truths are replaced with lies.

As our MOEM can own almost anything and anyone, it’s obvious that they will not want all of their wrongdoing known to those they exploit. So they are never going to allow any real knowledge of their actions to be taught at any of their schools. Hence why these caldrons of ignorance attempt to get as many of their slaves to believe the fairy tales of the big bad evil man, who must be stopped by the great and the good minions of our sockmakers. With many valuing these lies, it allows our sockmakers to sell themselves as these passive folk who help the economies of their slaves, when the reality is the opposite, and anyone who sees their lies for what they are is labelled as less intelligent and not given their glorified certificates to prove they are a valuable member of their master’s cult.

The historical regularity in which individuals and nations are tagged as the “bad guys” for not fully submitting to international private central bankers, who will happily murder millions to monopolise a MOE, is not something their schools teach. As our sockmakers vassal hierarchies lying industries are owned by those willing to murder half the world to satisfy their own desires, many are led to believe all the wrongs, assassinations, forced regime changes and wars that are orchestrated by our MOE monopolists are great and glorious things that should inspire us, instead of disgust us.

The history of our money monopolists

Our medium of exchange monopolists have been around for some time, so let’s just, for laughs and giggles, do what no sockmakers education system will do, and loosely string together a few steps in our history of monopolising money in order to monopolise human exploitation. Let’s begin with the Phoenicians, who had their empire around three and a half thousand years ago, with their base on the island off of Tyre (around modern-day Lebanon).

The Phoenicians, like any sockmaker, profited from exploiting those that used their MOE, and so “encouraged” (forced) others to use and value their monopolised trading tools, in order to create a dependence on their medium of worth in as many populations as possible. Just as our modern-day sockmakers monopolise trade and resources to exploit their populations, the Phoenicians expanded their empire throughout the Mediterranean and beyond to do the same. The practices used to “encourage” populations to tolerate a monopolised MOE by our modern-day sockmakers, were arguably similar to that used by the Phoenicians. Buy enough armies and hierarchies to threaten and destroy those that are not too keen on being enslaved by those who wish to monopolise human worth.

A few hundred years into the Phoenicians’ largely seafaring empire, hordes of marauders turned up by sea to terrorize the hierarchies and populations of the eastern Mediterranean. Today, we call this group “the Sea People”. With the usual practices of mass murder and destruction, “the Sea People” caused chaos in the whole region and set many cultures back, and even ended some before returning to where they came from (sound familiar?), but this is all in a day’s work for our sockmakers. Although when we say the whole region, “the Sea People” did not harm the Phoenicians, as few bite the hand that feeds them. Our modern-day sockmakers use the same practice of buying an army that they can hide behind and blame for the destruction they orchestrated.

As is the standard practice for establishing ourselves as a MOEM, once we have weakened or destroyed those who may oppose our tyranny, the Phoenicians minted their new currency that was used by their victims to complete their control over all who used it (again, sound familiar?). This established the Phoenicians’ trade network as the largest the Mediterranean had seen in our known history. Just as our modern era of sockmakers have, by using the same practices to build and control the world’s trade networks to dominate trade markets today.

Plato referred to the Phoenicians as “lovers of money”, so many groups knew they were big fans of monopolising it. As such, just as today’s sockmakers use their monopoly to harm all and elevate themselves, the Phoenicians’ wrongdoing had inspired their victims to hate them with a passion. So, when under a thousand years later, Alexander the Great came along, many may have felt he was doing all in the region a huge favour when he drove much of the Phoenician hierarchy and their minions out of the region, by getting through the most impregnable city of the age that money could buy, in the island fortress of Tyre. It is perhaps no coincidence that Alexander the Great eventually met the same fate as many who have challenged or threatened our sockmakers monopoly on our MOE, just as others face the same threat today.

If we look through the history of our most prolific wrongdoers, our sockmakers have always used somewhat easily defendable places as their base of operations, and they do like their islands. After fleeing to their colony of Carthage, our ancient sockmakers use this as their bases and went on to build themselves another puppet empire. And just as our sockmakers have established control over the differing globally dominate empires of the last few hundred years, we could argue that they did the same during the transitioning of hierarchy dominance across the era with Rome and beyond. From Tyre, Carthage, Rome, Venice, London, the Swiss Alps, Washington, Hong Kong and Singapore, (not to mention a few other places) our MOEM know they need a safe place to hide from their victims’ justice.

With our sockmakers’ ability to hold a grudge, and their vice-like control over most European/western hierarchies, perhaps the crusades were our sockmakers trying to regain what they believe to be their home region and take back control of it. Although the crusades also worked well at bankrupting European hierarchies, so that our sockmakers could take them over by lending them funds to pay for their war machines and calling in the debt at extortionate interest rates. Sound familiar?

Using the same practices of buying hierarchies, armies and populations favour with their endless supply of their MOE and religious hatred, our sockmakers continue to expose the region to their reign of terror even to this day. But then again, what region is not subjected to our sockmakers reign of terror? When our sockmaker’s European empires expanded around the globe, their reach stretched all around the world, where their vassals’ colonies, who were murdered into submission by countless genocides, helped them gain even more wealth and control than ever before.

With Hong Kong and Singapore used as our sockmakers base of operations to enslave Asia into their monopolised control over human worth, and Washington in the Americas to do the same in the west alongside London in europe, these highly defendable places aided in their world domination of the human exploitation industry. Japan (another island) was the last Asian country to fall to our sockmakers European colonisers, as they proved to be the most resistant to becoming another notch in our sockmakers bedpost (arguably in part due to them being an island). Once under their control, our sockmakers used the population of Japan to do their bidding in both WW1 and WW2.

Japan was used in WW1 to attack Germany’s Asian colonies in the long process of destroying and taking control of Germany’s banking system. As perhaps part of a deal, Japan expected to be rewarded with its sovereignty and freedom from European colonialism after WW1. During the 1919-1920 Paris peace conference (yep, those that incited war, mass destruction and the murder of millions, actually called their victory parade a “peace conference”), where treaties proclaimed who were the masters and who were the slaves, Japan, perhaps rather naively, believed the promise of sovereignty would be upheld during this conference by those who repeatedly proved to have no integrity. To maybe only Japan’s surprise, their masters broke their promises and did not allow them to break from their servitude. Where they very much remain today.

During this conference, Japan even proposed a racial equality clause in the League of Nations charter. No doubt because they were intimately aware of the racial inequality that their European masters valued. Our sockmakers most controlled nations of Britain, USA, France and Italy did not even want to pretend to value such a thing, so these “big four” rejected the proposal, as their elevated worth was aided by the racial discrimination of others. Article 22 of the League of Nations covenant is a glorious example of how ignorances are always valued by those who profit from them. It is particularly derogatory towards central Africans, maybe because Germany had colonies in the region, who knows? Perhaps our sockmakers knew Japan would be crucial during WW2 to maintain their empire, so they could never let them go their own way.

Japan was used by our sockmakers to maintain the boot of tyranny on the necks of the Asian countries their European vassals had colonised, as the European vassal hierarchies needed their armies back in Central Europe to extend their sockmakers control, and dominate the MOE in that region. If Asia were free from Europe’s genocidal minions, the people of those countries might have got used to the idea of keeping their own resources to themselves, so no doubt there was a bit of the old pitting vassal states against one another to ensure no unity in Asia threatened our sockmakers dominance. Thus, in WW2, Japan, with perhaps using the knowledge of the previous broken promises in WW1, took their chance to gain the sovereignty they had been denied, but like many who live under the heel of tyranny of our sockmakers, they became the tyrants they had resisted for so long.

When Germany was defeated, and our sockmakers had sold their genocides in Europe and beyond as a great moral deed to be used to justify their future genocides, Japan was unsurprisingly sold as great evil doers for committing the very same acts and practices that European and American colonisers glorified, when they themselves violated the very same populations in Asia.

From the Phoenicians wars to our modern-day wars, it is fair to say we will always be murdering one another if a few control our MOE that all human worth is reduced to. Hence, we find ourselves today, where few hierarchies have managed to hold out from the constant onslaught of our sockmakers control, and their willing murderers who will commit every wrong for their master’s socks. However, this does not stop our sockmakers from selling their vassals as sovereign states, even though without a sovereign monetary system, these states are far from sovereign.

Alexander the Great was just one of many popular figures people rallied behind in campaigns against our money monopolists socially destructive force of excess exploitation, or usury. Alexander was no doubt influenced by Plato and Aristotle, who were apparently very much against usury. We could argue that other historical popular figures who may have understood that no society can flourish with never-ending debt, and whom often met similar fates, which is often a clue to opposing our money masters, include St Augustine, Julius Caesar, Seneca, Muhammad, Charlemagne, Edward III, Dante, Pope Clement V, Martin Luther, Napoleon, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Mahathir Mohamad, Hitler, Thomas Sankara and more recently Saddam Hussein, Hugo Chavez and last but by no means least, the leader that helped to achieve the unicorn of a debt free state within our sockmakers modern golden age of forced debt slavery, Muammar Gaddafi, to name but a few.

This is not to suggest that all (or even any) of these “leaders” were not status seekers or infected with the array of ignorances status seekers must carry, but as with most things, there are differing levels of ignorance and malice when it comes to human exploitation. All social hierarchies exploit their slaves (or populations) to varying degrees, but by monopolising a MOE and using that position to inflict interest at ever-increasing excessive rates, it’s always going to end up the same way, with these monopolists taking everything from these populations. This always results in the same standard our modern societies have succumbed to, where a tiny few own most (if not all) of what there is to be owned, and reduce everyone else to a life of survival at the mercy of their owners. When, as a MOEM, we have taken all there is to take, what has any population got left to give us when their communities are destroyed, but themselves? Freedom and democracy, anyone!

Now, sure, we are skipping over vast swathes of our sockmakers orchestrated wrongdoings, but needless to say, they all follow a similar pattern. As we can see, there is very much a need for our sockmakers to hide in the shadows, and they do this in many ways. Using many fictions is just one practice to hide behind, but, of course, they do like to credit others with their efforts by decreeing the transferable status of villain or hero onto those that perform in their pantomimes of genocide.

Few who are adorned with elevated worth within their cultures dare to speak publicly of even the existence (never mind the actions) of their shadow masters, and our well-conditioned “teachers” ensure their deeds are not shared within any of their masters’ education systems. With our sockmakers pulling the strings of many of their most murderous vassal empires, and crediting their vassals with their murder count, it is not hard to conclude that our sockmakers clandestine empires are responsible for most of the needless murders of human beings in our known history. But don’t expect those that call themselves teachers to be addressing this in any of their schools.

Another subject that has all but been erased or shelved to the realms of myth and fantasy is giant humans. Since the birth of our money monopolist’s forced indoctrination systems that rewards ignorance over knowledge, the mention of giant humans can bring scorn, but let’s look at it logically. During the Pleistocene Epoch, around 2.5million to 12,000 years ago, there was a peak of giant mammals roaming the earth. Are we to believe we were not among them, and ignore all the evidence, bodies, and testimonies that were widespread before mass indoctrination, just to appease our masters’ lies? From our status seekers perspective, if many giant humans were kicking around for a while, acknowledging this can expose many of their lies about their history, as well as be interpreted as a blow to their egos, as height is always very important to those that seek elevation above others. Not sure how we wandered down the path of giants here, but hey!

Anyway, enough of this historical dot joining and back to school. Hierarchal schools are always keen to encourage their slaves to look up to others, so that others can look down upon them. Hero worship is always a well-worn tool of all social hierarchies, with their heroes coming mostly from obedient slaves or their own glorified wrongdoers. Highly obedient and ignorant individuals make the best heroes and enforcers for any social hierarchy. The oppressed will always have a degree of motivation to go to war against their oppressors, so social hierarchies must constantly sell the idea of phantom enemies to ensure their slaves don’t recognise their true oppressors.

Enforcers that are suggestible to obvious lies will have little issue in harming and killing any such phantom enemy of their masters, even if those so-called enemies are their own families. The practice of re-presented a glorified thief and murderer as being a patriot to the fictions of a few, where hierarchies can use their enforcers to steal the resources and wealth from their targeted phantom enemies by exploiting those who confuse loyalty to a few glorified wrongdoers with being righteous, is common within hierarchies schools.

Within hierarchies, the highest intellectual status is often reserved for those who limit themselves to one specific field. Now, of course, this does allow total absorption in their chosen field, but as everything is connected, such a practice often leaves blind spots that go unchallenged by those within any field. Those who understand the connectivity of every field and enjoy the pursuit of many fields are encouraged to stick with one in order to gain their superficial elevation in status that these cultures value.

If we take the story of Archimedes as someone who pursued many fields of knowledge and was killed by a Roman soldier after a long siege, we could argue that, for all the benefits that come from the pursuit of knowledge, knowing how to kill each other will always be our most valued intellectual skill. Some may say that a genius was killed by an idiot, or the idiot was the one who didn’t know how to defend themselves successfully, and the genius was the one with the sword, but whatever the knowledge we pursue, it is always limited when we isolate ourselves within one field.

Today, just like every other time in cults of differing worth, our knowledgeable murderers murder many like Archimedes all the time, as all who know differing worth is an ignorance, will always be feared by all who use it to elevate themselves within any field. We will continue to murder those who could help advance our collective knowledge as long as our priority remains serving the base desires of a few. Our habit of wiping out whole civilizations and assimilating any survivors into the conqueror’s culture shows how easy our knowledge and technologies can be lost to the base desires of a few.

The Idiotic Genius and the Genius Idiot

Only a fool thinks they can’t be fooled. Those who are overly concerned with being perceived as a fool (such as status seekers) limit their own potential and understanding. As there is an idiot in every genius and a genius in every idiot it is idiotic to define anyone as only one or the other. Learning is the practice of idiots, not learning is the acceptance of staying an idiot. Those who understand that we are all idiots, should have little need to prove otherwise to anyone, but cultures mired in the intelligence ignorance are brimming with status seekers who are overloaded with ignorances of the very nature of what we are.

No one is any one thing, but hierarchies profit more from painting all black and white. No individual is all bad or all good, all intelligent or all dumb, all sinner or all saint, all hero or all villain...etc. But this does not stop many status seekers from brandishing their labels onto those they wish to elevate or devalue, in accordance with their ignorances.

Many hierarchal groups and fields are led by those who are vastly less competent than others. With our social structures that need liars to sell the lies needed to champion the more-than/less-than ignorances, obedience to the nonsense of such lies is always rewarded above competence, knowledge, and skill within any field. Hence, the hordes of sycophants that make up the vast majority of valued members of our social hierarchal societies and fields, while those with a degree of integrity are shunned to the outskirts of such groups.

Social hierarchies have little to no interest in developing socially, and why would they? If the few have everything they could wish for, and control of those they wish to exploit, and even those who may threaten their lifestyle of opulence, all is good, no matter how many must suffer and die for their excess privilege. By keeping their slaves busy with the cycles of rebuilding and destroying their own communities, the repetitive nature of hierarchal social structures can be celebrated within any of its realms of regression, stagnation, or relative advancement. With hierarchies in every field monopolising the advances or discoveries made by those of less status, it discourages many from even getting involved in aiding any field when we know our glorified status seekers can easily control the products of our efforts, just to enhance their own wealth and status to further glorify themselves.

So-called higher education pretends to encourage and value debate among their carefully selected students, but what they really value is controlling the narratives of debate by reducing any real debate into a form of censorship. Those who try to bring the truth into their heavily orchestrated methods of debate can be easily belittled and demonised for going against or exposing the narratives that any hierarchal society’s valued liars are paid to repeat. Our glorified liars must avoid any real acknowledgement of the consequences of glorifying inequality and injustice at all costs, as their lies can’t stand up to any real scrutiny. Hence why their so-called debates are little more than performers who conspire to belittle anyone who won’t repeat their lies.

The self-serving, manipulative practice of arguing well for a lie is rebranded as a valued trait of the highly educated. This practice of declaring a winner of a conversation that is being judged by those suffering from the same ignorances, is obviously a wonderful way to sell any lie among our status seekers, as they get to ignore the truth in favour of the false perceptions of those susceptible to this form of manipulation.

Even science does not escape the tirade of lies that spew from our glorified wrongdoers, as they try to sell nature in alignment with their own ignorances and interests. It is no wonder their understanding of the world around them grows at a snail’s pace and even regresses, when feeding the greed of a few is always the priority with these cultures. Even when others look to those that are less ignorant for guidance, the common practice of attempting to shame and belittle those who question obvious lies encourages many of us to avoid trying to hold our status seekers and glorified wrongdoers accountable for their lies and wrongs.

By monopolizing science, our social hierarchies can manipulate a level of control to legitimise any lie, in the same way they do with their monopolies on justice, violence, mediums of exchange, media, education,…etc. Science is our attempt to understand how everything in nature functions and is connected, but when we struggle to even connect with each other within such cultures, it is perhaps no wonder that many of these connections elude such groups.

Social hierarchies attempt to attach fear and guilt to any disobedience of their will into the minds of their populations from an early age, by convince them to value some kind of fictitious ordained authority. Hierarchal education systems are temples that worship collective ignorance (so like all temples really), where kids are taught to be more than others, rather than encouraged to gain more knowledge than they have. It is where our slave populations go to be convinced that they are not slaves, in order to render them ineffective at becoming anything other than slaves.

Washing the Brain

A hierarchy that has broken their population’s desire for knowledge in favour of the belonging that is dished out for obedience, does not have to rely on force alone to oppress their slaves, as they will oppress themselves. This is especially effective when conquering a new population, as adults will understand exactly who their oppressors are, so they will never fully obey them without a degree of resistance. However, by forcing their children to endure years of propaganda, hierarchies can ensure the next generation and subsequent generations of an enslaved population come to value their oppressors and their lies.

By making their indoctrination mandatory, social hierarchies offer their slaves the choice of oppressing their children’s free will and desire for knowledge, or face prison. Locking up these hardened criminals for the heinous crime of not surrendering their children to forced indoctrination may seem like a practice that has been long abandoned, but we are still subjecting too many parents to these abusive institutions, as there is too much profit for the few in doing so. We could argue that these are the best kind of parents who sacrifice themselves to one prison system, so that their children can avoid the same fate of another, but our cultures of greed will always paint anyone who disobey their interests as criminals or less-than in some way.

The fact that all those involved in the persecution of parents who commit no wrong, other than wanting their children to be free from the barrage of lies and abuse that these education systems peddle in, have themselves been indoctrinated into serving the greed of a few, is often more than enough evidence to prove it to be something that should be avoided, if we wish our children to value justice and their fellow human beings enough to cause no unjust harm. Only within a culture that values extreme wrongdoing does this disgusting practice of destroying families have value.

Stealing the children of slaves to force them into their “education” systems that do little more than brainwash most into becoming an obedient slave, allowed our glorified wrongdoers to not only enslave the body of their slaves as they did with the first generation of parents, but also enslave the minds of their children. A slave that knows they are a slave can at least have a free mind, but slaves that think they are free are more enslaved than most. An enslaved body can be expensive, as it requires supervision to ensure the mind does not act to free the body, but an enslaved mind is much cheaper to deal with and can allow the body to roam freely to the degree that its masters allow, as they are less likely to try to free themselves or challenge their oppressors.

By enslaving the mind, the body will follow. In order to ensure the slave classes never focus too much on their true oppressors, hierarchies keep their slaves busy with labour and nonsense, so they won’t organise or even think too much about what they are doing with their short time here. This is just one of the many practices that aid in the goal of creating obedient slaves. A lifetime of labour that is void of long time periods away from the grind of feeding the greed of a few is expected from all decent slaves. The misery of doing meaningless work that serves no value to ourselves is sold as a reality of life, rather than the abnormality to our nature that it is.

After a decade of indoctrination to the greed of a few, many are content to spend most of their lives slaving away to feed that greed at their own cost. By keeping most people too busy trying to achieve the basics that most hunter-gatherer societies achieve with little effort, our obedient slaves provide little resistance to their glorified wrongdoers’ actions. Only in retirement (if it still exists for the slave classes after the age of retirement is pushed up until death) do many get the time to contemplate the realities of the world their masters orchestrate to facilitate their maliciousness, but with the combination of a lifetime of valuing lies and the physical frailty that is now common in old age after a lifetime of toil, most pose little risk to the younger generation of obedient slaves who are all too willing to harm anyone their masters point to.

We have allowed our desire to understand to become monopolised by our glorified wrongdoers, leading to most of us repeating their lies. These education systems are not just poor at sharing knowledge and good at convincing many to believe in lies, but are so bad from an intellectual perspective that they have arguably created the most incurious and ignorant human populations to ever walk the earth. Even the more servile among us that get to indulge in our desire for knowledge to a degree, must stay within our masters limitations.

Conditioning hierarchal populations to accept differing worth and all the wrongs necessary for its existence requires many practices, with the incentive of a small percentage of a population given the chance to become part of the glorified few to its varying degrees, being a common one and reason enough for many. When populations accept that their wealth will be stolen from them if they do not bow to the will of a few, their compliance to the injustices that are required to support differing worth allows a few to have so much more than most.

By encouraging their students to celebrate gross inequality and injustice, these schools ensure the next generation of wrongdoers have little concern or even awareness of the wrongs they will be asked to engage in and support. Schools are where many are persuaded to ignore reality and even what they see right in front of them, in favour of the lies of anyone who has been bestowed with wealth and status. The ancient art of saying what we see becomes an act worthy of scorn in order to steer young minds towards valuing even the most obvious of lies that our eyes can easily expose.

We are all more than one thing, but to glorify and demonisein the way cultures of status do, we are encouraged to define ourselves and others by one thing, and that thing is usually defined as how our social hierarchy perceive our worth to them. As their education systems try to persuade as many of their students as they can, to view their fellow human beings through the very much manicured narratives of their hierarchy, this aids in the grading of people, while ignoring the very real multi-faceted aspects and abilities of everyone under their control.

These education systems try to inflict their biases, ignorances, fictions and world view on to their populations, so that they can be used to manipulate the behaviours of that population to align with their hierarchies interests. A curriculum that conditions an implied level of consent in human beings to become servile to the corporations that profit from their servitude will always be more valued to a social hierarchy than a curriculum based on knowledge.

After many years of having numerous cloaks of identity thrown over us by anyone with a smidgeon of social value, in an attempt to cover up the truth that we are all pretty much the same, many of us can come to accept these identities in order to appease the ignorances that these cultures are mired in. If we only allow others to answer the question of “who am I” for us, then we can deny who we are. As polarizing one group of people from another is a standard practice for status seekers, empathy and compassion is often reserved only for those who have been tarnished with the same fiction.

Empathy is important for us to understand others and their motives, so again, it is perhaps no surprise that empathy is discouraged within these education systems, in order to produce a more self-serving population that aspires to mimic the actions of their glorified wrongdoers, rather than challenge them. Devoid of empathy, many can struggle to understand the true nature and motives of those they glorify, or the struggles of those they demonise.

The slave schools that hierarchies force their chattel to endure are steeped in the stench of malice that oozes from those who wish to be masters of others. Many who experience these glorified children’s prisons, with their dogma and lies that such slave schools preach, come to value their slavery to the point that they will go on to believe almost every lie any masters tell them. Convincing anyone who is forced into doing something, that they are free and not slaves, despite being coerced into these prisons with violence or the threat of it, and hunted down like escaped convicts should they fail to be present for their master’s lectures on differing worth, is arguably a great achievement for any master.

Many may value the “education” that these schools preach based on the rewards they attain for repeating what they were told, but for those more interested in understanding than belonging, there is little doubt about the nature of our slave schools, no matter the status any status seekers attach to them. As our slave schools are designed to condition most slaves into accepting and even glorifying the acts of serving the interests of a few at the cost of themselves and others, we can observe the great value they have given to our glorified wrongdoers over the period of time in which they have been used to increase assistance and reduce resistance to their greed.

Anyone could be forgiven for thinking that these pathetic excuses for an education system are run by idiots who believe that intelligence is defined by our ability to echo the sounds that we hear, thus putting our intelligence on par with a cave that possesses the same ability to bounce sounds around the air of the source. However, they are, of course, manufactured to be awful at sharing knowledge for a reason, because our hierarchies are more interested in rewarding those of us who lack the ability or desire to question what they are told and possess the ability to regurgitate sounds, as this group is much easier to manipulate into valuing their wrongs.

When our desire to learn is based on our need to gain acceptance or status among our groups, then this becomes our priority of learning, so we value mimicking those around us over any subject. When our desire to learn is based on the genuine thirst for knowledge that we all have as young children, then the priority becomes the knowledge alone and not all the superficial nonsense that comes with differing worth or methods of delivery.

As every field is reduced to a group of glorified status seekers jockeying for the elevated positions within their field, we lose our ability to advance those fields in favour of the practice of glorifying a few. The challenges we experience as a species will always play second fiddle to the interests of the few within such cultures, and as such, when a true challenge is presented, as opposed to the manufactured challenges of war, poverty, crime, famine, homelessness,…etc., these cultures are ill-equipped to deal with them.

Hierarchies are usually the first to flee any community that is about to fall to any incoming doom, as leaving all their slaves behind to be slaughtered is no great tragedy when they can always find more slaves to elevate themselves above. The problems we face from adhering to the lies of a few may be substantial, but they are nothing compared to the problems nature’s truths can subject us to. If we ignore all the knowledge nature shows us every day, in favour of the lies of a few, we risk limiting our longevity, but as we are inflicted with social hierarchies, who’s to say that is a bad thing. As long as we restrict our knowledge with differing worth, we may end up back in the Stone Age, needing to relearn the limited knowledge we already possess, all over again. This may just be the cycle of our cultures of differing worth.

The Immortality of Truth

There is knowledge that is only relevant to a time and place, which only has a degree of worth until those who give it worth die off. However, timeless knowledge that is in effect the truth that is always relevant, no matter the time and place, never dies. As lies die with their liars and the truth needs no voice to exist, timeless knowledge existed long before we did, and will be relevant long after our species is gone.

The sheer bombardment of lies and ignorances we face within our lying cultures is somewhat staggering, especially when we consider our potential. Valuing lies and belittling truths may make us very valuable to any social hierarchy, and shows the survival of the fittest theory is dwarfed by the survival of the most suggestible, but it also produces very ignorant human beings. If those who value the lies of their hierarchy took a moment to consider the fact that differing worth does not value knowledge, then maybe some would not be so keen on spreading such an abundance of lies, if any value knowledge over their base desires, that is.

Our knowledge will always be limited by our practice of status-seeking, and promoting lies and its wealthier cousin, beliefs, above knowledge, will always occur within this practice. By encouraging their populations to bond over what they believe, instead of what they know, hierarchies have a much easier time in manipulating their populations to their will. However, timeless knowledge is always of worth, regardless of the level of worth decreed on the sharer, or what knowledge is glorified or demonised by any hierarchy.

As our cultures of greed encourage us to live a superficial life filled with the ignorances that all social hierarchies profit from, an authentic life, where honesty and truth holds meaning, becomes the exception, rather than the rule. By avoiding truth and encouraging beliefs based on lies, social hierarchies attempt to rid their populations of the curiosity that comes with the awareness of not knowing something, and replace it with a desire to overly value beliefs out of fear of appearing less intelligent. It is common for us to mistake a belief for knowledge, and thus prevent us from knowing. If we are content with a belief, we have less desire to know.

If we define our intellectual identity based on what we believe, then we can fool ourselves into thinking we are very intelligent. We can even do the same if we know a lot about little or even a little about a lot, but if we base it on what we do not know, then we are more likely to come to a totally different conclusion, assuming we have the self-awareness to recognise all we are ignorant of. If we explore the different realms of perspective on anything, then we can restrict ourselves from glorifying our ignorances, but when we mire ourselves within just one of our own perspectives or one of any groups, then we are more likely to become a valued member of any hierarchal cult. If we are consumed within the fog of our own self-interests, then we will always restrict our ability to see beyond ourselves.

When we are very young, we love to learn and have fun, and learning is always fun until we endure status seekers, of course. Learning is always much easier when we have a fun-loving teacher who can pass on knowledge in an engaging way, rather than the dreary, disengaging monotone militaristic ideology of preaching that all social hierarchies use to kill the fun of learning for many. We learn more when we have an interest in something and can learn at our own pace.

When we learn for the sake of survival or status and wealth, we are merely acquiring information for those functions, regardless of its duplicity, but when we are free to learn what we desire to learn or for the sheer joy of attaining knowledge, then we can open ourselves up to the much greater breadth of knowledge that is all around us. Instead of the arguably more natural process of encouraging children to become free-thinking, independent adults, hierarchal schools are designed to encourage their victims to behave like obedient children even when in adulthood, by perceiving their oppressive masters as some kind of parental authority that has to tell them what to do and what to think, even when childhood is long gone.

In order to value social hierarchies, we must be ignorant, manipulative or both, so their education systems program their victims to be ignorant and if they are ignorant or wealthy enough, then they can move on to higher education to be programmed into being manipulative too.

Although management school for managers sounds better than manipulation school for manipulators. We only have to observe the pantomimes that these performers often go through when their elevated indoctrination is complete with their graduation ceremonies, to understand the power of the intelligence ignorance and why hierarchies fill their influential positions with their certified liars and idiots who pose little to no threat of exposing their masters’ acts.

Many within these cultures claim that they want their children to be well-educated, but what they often truly mean is that they want their children to gain status and wealth from the masters of their cults. It has arguably never been so easy to educate ourselves and our own children. Granted, our glorified wrongdoers will do all they can to discourage parents from teaching truths to their children, as they always have by demonising and criminalising those who do so outside of their master’s doctrine that promote fictitious realities. But if we truly wanted to have the most educated children on the planet, then keeping them as far from a hierarchal school would be a good start.

Even if we do educate our children to a much higher standard than any hierarchy could, without their master’s certification of obedience that they sell as qualifications, the most educated individuals on the planet would have little worth within such cultures. Thus, many parents have little to no concern for their children’s level of understanding, and are more concerned with their child’s position in their hierarchy’s spectrum of differing worth. Before we go scrubbing Mother’s Day and Father’s Day from our calendars, we must bear in mind that this is a good strategy to improve survival within groups that will harm and kill those who are less keen on adopting their ignorances. Even if it does mean we limit our level of understanding on many subjects.

Our current cultures have barely begun to understand the endless possibilities nature can provide us with, as well as losing much knowledge within the farcical process of elevating a few above everyone else. We always have the potential within any of our populations, regardless of their time or place, to recognise all of nature’s lessons. Yet we take our newest members of the species and place them into these systems of hate, in order to exercise the near death of their compassion, empathy, curiosity and desire to understand. Arguably the most important role of these systems is to take children that know they are the same as those around them, and convince them to value the ignorance of differing worth, and once valued, this can be used to manipulate the desire for acceptance into obeying those elevated by this ignorance.

The stunting of our understanding, to ensure many or most rarely stray from any level of understanding that goes beyond our base desires, does little to expand our knowledge. The potential of most is crushed or at least encouraged to pause their passions until they fulfil the desires of their hierarchy. As many are encouraged or pushed onto the treadmill of a paused life, where carrots and sticks are brandished in order to coerce obedience to the greed of a few, many must plod along, collecting their carrots and blows from sticks until retirement in old age, before they gain a semblance of freedom to live the life they wanted or fulfil the potential they once had, but are now too old to pursue.

For our slavemasters, having the lives of their slaves paused in a state of servitude, or convincing them to value their slavery until their bodies become too frail to labour productively, ensures adults in the prime of their lives are focused on their master’s levers of worth, until their peak ability to threaten their master’s control over them has passed.

Of course, it does not have to be this way, as we are more than capable of valuing knowledge over ignorances to produce a true education system that is based on knowledge, and allows students to absorb as much knowledge as they wish. Instead of holding back children with the notion that every age group must learn the same thing at the same pace and in the same style, we can create a vastly more adaptive and personalised system to suit the needs of each individual or type.

We can abandon the intelligence ignorance and the ignorance of differing worth to value all, thus allowing all of us the opportunity to discover and develop our passions and abilities within various fields.

We can create a supportive cooperative education system that recognises the worth of all, instead of a competitive system that glorifies and demonises in order to produce adults that aspire to slide along their hierarchies master/slave spectrums or worth. Instead of throwing our stones of ignorance at those who come after us, like most of those who came before us did, we could gift those that come after us with our knowledge.

However, this will always remain a mere fantasy within our social hierarchies, as it goes against the nature of glorifying wrongdoing. So for as long as we continue this practice, we will have to endure their harmful and wasteful systems of indoctrination that celebrates ignorances over knowledge.

Chapter 9

The Wealth of Health

Health, like most things we rely on, is never appreciated more than when we no longer have it. Our bodies and their contents are the most important things we ever really have, so we should always treasure them. Within cultures of social status, where most are forced to toil for a few in order to justify their existence, we see many trade their health for a little wealth, only to realise too late which has more value, while there are many whose health has failed them, willing to trade all of their wealth for their health, leaving the poor and unhealthy vulnerable to the exploitative nature of such cultures.

Within these cultures of greed, it is inevitable that our empires within empires (or corporations within corporations) will take advantage of a population’s ill health. A cynical mind could suggest this incentivises our glorified wrongdoer’s medical industries to encourage or prolong illness, but there is no need for cynicism when the truth is all around us. Thus, we see these medical industries that are ready and willing to exploit the sick, by focusing on the most profitable treatments to prolong or maintain ill health, rather than seeking remedies or cures to limit or eliminate illness.

Despite greed taking priority over the health of any social hierarchy’s population, there are, of course, many who enter these health care industries with good intent and even go on to help many people, but they are still used as pawns in their social hierarchy’s game of human exploitation, just as every slave within every industry is used in the same manner. The history and present of these medical industries have their share of advancements, even if they only occur at a relatively slow pace, but they are also littered with calamity, regression and severe negligence, where so many are harmed and killed in the pursuit of profit. And their future will be no different.

With Germany being among the first nations to recognise the importance of having a healthy population by introducing a national healthcare system in 1883 (during their somewhat of a renaissance era), many other hierarchies followed suit. Albeit decades and even over a century later, with many still lacking this basic of social groups. Those of elevated worth have always had more access to healthcare than lowly slaves, and today, half of the world’s population doesn’t have access to healthcare, with millions more having to make the choice of suffering and dying, or pushing themselves and their families into extreme debt and poverty, in order to pay for any help. Yet we still attach the word humane, named after our species, to compassion. Our healthcare industries may now concentrate on treating symptoms to maintain the core causes of ill health and a steady income stream, as a one-time cure is only a one-time payment, but we are capable of much better.

Imagine if the plumbing industry acted in the same way by treating the “symptoms” of a leak, rather than the leak itself. Constantly paying a plumber to come and treat the dampness caused by a leaky pipe would make a plumber a lot richer than just fixing the leaky pipe the first time around. If our hierarchal health industries were about producing a healthy population, then they have a very poor record of late, but, of course, its main goal is the same as every other industry, to collect more and more of their master’s socks. This makes the desire for a healthy population using preventative health care a non-starter for our cultures of greed, as the profits would soon dry up if a large percentage of the population were not subjected to their long-term “treatments”.

Millions die every year due to “medical errors”, and even our sockmakers World Health Organization (WHO) reported that four out of every ten patients are harmed during primary and ambulatory (outpatient) health care. The most detrimental “errors” are related to diagnosis, prescription and the use of drugs (or “medicines” as they are often referred as). Having a 40% chance of being harmed by a medical industry that claims to care for the health of others, would suggest a rather poor level of competence.

However, as our hierarchal medical industries’ priorities wealth over health, we can understand the lack of care that may lead to the death of millions every year. Hierarchal societies do not care about the lives of their slaves, regardless of how many words they use to distract the more suggestible among us from their actions, yet despite their endless mass wrongdoing, many believe the illusion that mass murderers, genociders and their supporters actually value life, other than their own, of course.

Their health industries leaderships (like every other under a social hierarchy) are saturated with social status seekers who are deluded by the ignorance of differing worth. This crippling ignorance that overvalues some individuals in order to undervalue others limits the effectiveness and competence of any workforce. As the nature of hierarchies is to give most to the few and less to the many, they will always encourage many to focus on attaining and maintaining elevated worth at almost any cost.

As accountability is a bad word for status seekers and often avoided at all costs, those with more-than status within these health industries tend not to recognise the harm they cause to so many people. Much of this will be due to a fear of being sued in our money obsessed cultures, making denying any culpability necessary in a bid to cling to positions of worth or to protect the interests (and profits) of the industry at large. Just like many of their diagnosis, failing to recognise the problem does nothing to address it.

We are made from nature, and nature can cure many of the ills we face, but many of nature’s cures are now scoffed at, ridiculed and even declared illegal, at least up until the point where our hierarchies corporations can exploit and control any of nature’s gifts in order to feed the greed of a few. When it comes to medicine, nature is overflowing with cures our ancestors would arguably have been vastly more aware of than our present-day populations that are spoon-fed whatever these so-called health corporations profit from the most.

Many of nature’s cures are ignored by our sockmaker’s medical industry as only patented man-made drugs can be owned, controlled and profited from, on the scale they enjoy. Well, at least for the moment, until our glorified wrongdoers have claimed ownership of all nature holds. As modern medicine is and always has been as corrupt as every other industry within our social hierarchies, and focuses on treatments to generate a lifetime of profits as opposed to a one-off cure that holds far less profit, the Holy Grail for modern hierarchal medicine is not a cure, but a drug they insist has to be taken for a lifetime.

By controlling the legalised drug industries and demonising the uncontrolled illegal drug industry, a few corporations can generate huge profits by making drugs that cost little to nothing to make, and sell them for a small fortune within our greed-is-good cultures. Even though many of these drugs are harmful to fatal, our health industries do not let this get in the way of the more important practice of profiteering from the suffering many endure. Our glorified wrongdoers can easily get around any harm their products cause by declaring their causes as “side-effects”. This is a bit like calling a badly burnt hand a “side effect” of putting our hands in a fire, or calling death a “side-effect” of being hit by a speeding train. There is no such thing as a side-effects, there are only effects.

Claiming a drug aids one thing and shouting loudly about that one desirable effect to sell the product, while quietly labelling other undesirable effects as “side-effects” within their small to nano-print, is a common practice within our cultures that value deceit. While on the topic of deceit by the hypocrites who take their bank balance more seriously than their Hippocratic oath, let’s take a wander down the corpse infested past of our compassionately inept social hierarchies health care, to give ourselves an idea of what we can expect from our present and future, and peer behind the curtain of deceit that is forever pulled in front of our glorified medical industries.

Let’s take the history of scurvy as just one example, a disease (or condition) caused by a deficiency of vitamin C that can damage our health and even kill us. In our evolutionary past, this would not have been an issue for us, as, like most animals, we too once had the ability to produce our own vitamin C, but as with most things to do with mutations, there is always the element of risk in spinning the genetic roulette wheel. The gene that our distant ancestors used to make our vitamin C (the Gulop gene on our 8th chromosome) has mutated enough times to prevent it from now doing just that, as mutations are kind of like evolutions way of killing genes as well as changing them.

Pseudogenes, is the term we use for genes that no longer perform their original function, whether to become redundant or in favour of a new function (maybe the term Pseudohealthcare should be used for similar reasons), and we have many thousands of such genes in our genome. It’s the price of evolution. Anyway, historically humans have known for a long time that consuming foods that contain vitamin C is a cure for scurvy, with many of them even being documented as far back as 3000 years ago, and undocumented cures will no doubt go even further back than this. However, social hierarchies are not the best at passing on knowledge and tend to prefer killing others rather than learning from them. So the practice of repeatedly forgetting and rediscovering knowledge, leads to the kind of unnecessary tragedy that such cultures of greed inspire.

It is not just the millions who died during the European hierarchies colonizing orgy of terror from this time period that began in the late 1400s, where more sailors (let’s be kind) would die from scurvy during their long voyages of plunder, than in the course of the wrongdoing or warring they would partake in. But even before and after this time period, many died of scurvy due to their ignorance of nature’s cures. We won’t go into the whole historical debacle of this time, but to sum it up, our most prolific glorified wrongdoers were given the knowledge to cure scurvy by peoples they would call “savages”, and even their own servants who used such cures.

However, due to a combination of their own inability to believe those they perceive to be less-than, could possibly know more than their glorified medical professions, and the fact that most of those doing the dying were well within the less-than category of their populations, the cures were not implemented. Sound familiar? Today, the modern world has the knowledge and desire to cure scurvy (at least for now), but for hundreds of years, millions of people died unnecessarily as these hierarchal-based medical industries congratulated themselves on being experts in human health, while being totally ignorant of their own level of ignorance and the level of knowledge within those they perceived as less-than. One look at modern medicine shows us that little has changed since.

Doctors and health care workers have always killed people, as we are all susceptible to making mistakes, and we all have our own ignorances, so when dealing with the health and lives of others, our errors are always going to come with graver consequences. Many mothers died literally at the hands of doctors, with their poor hygiene, before they took the idea of bacteria or germs seriously. Whether doctors are telling people to smoke or take harmful drugs that will damage their health and even kill them, just to give themselves some extra income, we must bear in mind that they (like everyone else) are working within a social hierarchy and are subjected to the same pressures of differing worth that many face.

Doctors are by no means the only profession to gain wealth and status for committing wrongs, and even when the stakes are life and death, the celebration of incompetence that social status, cronyism and nepotism inspire will always lead to unnecessary suffering and death. Imagine if a large corporation who specialized in cheap poisoned fish, told staff in the catering industry that for every poisoned fish they sell, they will get a huge bonus, but the fish will harm peoples liver over time and may even kill them (as a side effect), even knowing this, many will gladly encourage people to eat this fish to increase their wealth at the expense of others health. We can be a cruel species even to ourselves when differing worth is valued.

Our hierarchal medical industries and those who work in them are often so glorified that most of the wrongs they inflict onto others are quickly covered up, denied or excused by trading the level of good they do (levels will vary) as a counter to the level of bad, regardless of the extent of harm they cause. Social status is the protector of much wrongdoing within these cultures that will gladly kill to maintain appearances, and the medical industries are no different to others in taking advantage of this.

Now, of course, these medical industries do much good and make their advances in helping many (especially those who can afford it), but as glorifying anything is just a valued ignorance, we allow more and more harm to befall others by avoiding a balanced and accurate understanding of the practices and treatments these medical industries partake in. With only 60% of customers avoiding harm or death, avoiding these health industries can be a safer option for many. The corporations that sell products used by our medical industries to be consumed by their customers play a huge role in much of the harm inflicted on many. Giving doctors financial incentives to push unneeded, overpriced and often harmful treatments is a very profitable strategy, even if it is very unethical. But what hierarchy cares for ethics?

Washing our Hands of Death

Let’s take the basic common practice of cleaning our hands in aiding the health of others as an example of how glorifying and demonising cultures always struggle to advance at any real pace, when mired in the ignorance of differing worth. Ignaz Semmellweis, a doctor who worked in an Austrian hospital in the mid-1800s, noticed that women who gave birth with the “aid” of a doctor had a much higher death rate due to infection than women who were aided by midwives. As this went against the male-glorifying practices we all know too well, he tried to work out how these apparently superior, more intelligent and educated males were being outperformed by inferior females.

Although, given a basic understanding of how females are treated in such cultures, it is possible that a female individual or group had already worked it out, but were overshadowed by the ignorances of male hubris until Dr Ignaz took them seriously. Anyway, after pondering an array of ridiculous theories, he eventually came to the truth of the matter, in that the male doctors practices of autopsies and let’s say other habits that left their hands brimming with life forms most of us would prefer not to have in certain parts of our bodies (don’t ask), meant that they had vastly more harmful bacteria on their hands than the midwives, leading to a much higher rate of infection among the mothers they were trying to help.

Once he introduced the practice of hand-washing before aiding any pregnant woman, the death rate due to infection drastically reduced. Now this knowledge could be used to save millions of people’s lives and help our understanding of biology to develop, but, of course, he too, like us, was immersed within a social hierarchy, so that did not happen. With their social status and wealth to protect, the status seekers within the health industry refused to accept the truths that were presented to them, and so, many doctors refused to wash their hands despite the risks they exposed to the lives of their patients. Our practices may change, but doctors killing people due to their omnipotence has not.

Instead of accepting that a group of intellectually glorified individuals could be killing people due to their ignorances, and absorb new knowledge as a remedy, the age-old practices of status seekers kicked in, and Ignaz Semmellweis was declared as the problem and fired from his job for stating the truth that doctors were killing people because they didn’t wash their hands.

The backlash for valuing the truth and the assassination of his reputation may have played a large part in him eventually being put into an insane asylum, or he could have been just another victim of the practice of declaring anyone who speaks a truth that may harm the interests of our glorified wrongdoers as insane and imprisoned there to stop him from undermining their gravy train. Pointing to the truth when within our groups of liars tends to have a predictable effect.

As the pace of advancement for status-seeking cultures is on par with a sloth suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome, our glorified wrongdoers eventually had to accept the truth that doctor Semmellweis tried to tell the world about, but many mothers needlessly lost their lives while they dithered in their own egos and greed. Sound familiar? It may have taken decades and well over a century for hand-washing to become a standard of care within our various health industries, but better late than never, even if it is too late for all the mothers and children who died just so others could celebrate their ignorances and elevated worth. On the same theme, we can see the same level of ignorance being repeated with their antibiotic hand-washing, as these health industries are going backwards in their understanding of bacteria, even if they are being consistent in putting profit before health.

With our habit of valuing the ignorances that enrich a few at the cost of the many, the drug industry has never had it so good, as they can buy medical professionals, policy-makers, propagandists and as many self-proclaimed experts as they wish from every lying industries, to help sell their cheap and often harmful products as something of high value. When a product that costs very little to produce can be sold for so much that many can’t even afford to buy or use it, we should hang our ethical heads in shame.

However, this level of greed does at least make the drug industry one of the wealthiest on the planet, and where there is wealth, there is power, not exactly to be used for good but to be used to monopolise their grip on the health of many. When greed is the most glorified motivation, causing more suffering is always going to be more profitable than ending it. Therefore, we cannot be too surprised at the lengths and depths that these industries will go to in order to profit from the suffering of others. Especially within our hierarchal cultures that need to inflict a steady dose of suffering upon most.

The drug industries monopoly on health maybe a social hierarchy’s dream, but it is a nightmare for anyone seeking a cure from ill health, as when “a customer cured is a customer lost” philosophy is the level of our malice, ill health becomes common. As with every other industry that is heavily monopolised by a few, progress in medicine and health care has to drag behind the greed of a few, instead of being free to flow with the knowledge and innovation that we always possess. By looking down on knowledge, just because it comes from those who are looked down upon, we continue our hierarchal healthcare tradition of allowing many to suffer and die needlessly.

What our glorified wrongdoers term as “legal drugs” kill vastly more people than what they label as “illegal drugs”. Our health industries with the help of their legal drugs are now among the top 3 killers within many of our cultures, but as they are largely monopolised to generate great wealth for a glorified few, killing so many people is just a side-effect of their greed. Whereas “illegal drugs” are not patented, so have avoided this monopolisation. Thus, as anyone can use them, they are declared as illegal to limit any competition to the monopolised drug industry.

That, as well as the fact that criminalising plants makes it so much easier for any social hierarchy to harm anyone they wish, simply by claiming they committed the heinous crime of possessing a plant. Humans have always used plants and always will, no matter how many demented wrongdoers declare them to be bad or criminal, simply to fill their own pockets, but this is just another example of how social hierarchies profit from criminalising human nature and human behaviour with their anti-human practices.

The drug industries have monopolised health care simply because they pander to the greed-is-good mantra that all social hierarchies champion, regardless of the human and social harm that is left in their wake. And just like every other industry that is heavily monopolised, our sockmakers are always lurking behind the scenes, pulling the strings of their puppets. Natural cures are the enemy of the drug industry, despite the vast majority of their drugs coming from nature. Let that sink in for a minute. As nature cannot be patented (well, it can if we change our definitions of nature), drug corporations use their wealth to steer their customers away from the cheaper cures that exist all around us.

The greed driven patent system, which the drug industry uses to monopolise the sales of a drug in order to control its price and profitability, works against innovation and development within the medical industry, just as it does in every other industry. With most drugs being taken from nature, it makes more sense for us to use the less harmful natural cures or treatments, but within our cultures of greed, our dealers in death take our natural cures and alter them in order to be patented once it has been transformed into something that is distinctively different from what exists in nature, even if it makes their drugs so different from the natural cure and less effective.

We are what we eat, or in today’s drug overdosed and poisoned world, we should maybe change that to we are what we consume, but this does not change the fact that food is medicine. Our diet hugely affects our health and development, and can play a large role in our length and quality of life. With most of us now living in an urban environment rather than a rural one, the majority of us are now more disconnected from the foods we eat than ever before. The quality and nutritional content of the food we eat is very important to our health, but unfortunately, our glorified wrongdoers do what they always do in harming others to elevate themselves by even turning food into a weapon.

Social hierarchies have always taken the best quality food for themselves and left their slaves with lower quality and lower nutritional foods, but it is only the last few generations of slave populations that have been exposed to the mass poisoning of their foods. With many of us consuming petroleum drugs and petroleum foods, the next time we run out of seasonings for our food, perhaps a visit to the local petrol station instead of the local supermarket will give us the taste we are used to. Within cultures that show such disrespect and contempt for most people, we should not be too surprised that the food those people are fed is shown an equal level of disrespect and contempt.

Controlling food is a practice hierarchies have always used to control their populations, as starving slaves often present less resistance to tyranny than well-fed ones. Today, the master classes are afforded what we now call organic food (or food as it was called for all of human history), while most of their slaves are fed poisoned or the more palatable term of “conventional” food. These conventional foods are sprayed with poisons or antibiotics, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and insecticides (cide means killer, so never a sought-after ingredient for any decent chef) to give them their more marketable names.

But regardless of what we call them, they are designed to kill biological life forms, and we are all biological. Although these poisons are marketed to kill life that is smaller than ourselves, we are obviously going to be affected by these poisons, especially when consuming them on a regular basis. With more than half of our cells consisting of bacteria, these poisons can hugely affect the balance of our microbiome, as well as our human cells, to contribute to our ill health and even death.

These poisons not only harm and kill microbes, insects, plants and humans, but also destroy our environments, along with the other life forms we share them with. If our bodies are made up of 100,000 proteins, and we make all these proteins from a combination of 20 amino acids, it is a bit like our language in that we make many words (a million or so in the English language if we count them all) from the 26 letters in the alphabet. When we fail to produce essential amino acids, then our health can suffer, as we lack the ability to produce the proteins that our bodies require to function. Just as if we failed to produce the sounds we make from the letter A or E, then our language would suffer, as we would lack the ability to produce many sounds and words.

Like the importance of vowels in our language, there are 9 essential amino acids that our bodies cannot produce, and without these, our health is compromised. We get many of these essential amino acids from bacteria, fungi and plants that have the ability to produce these amino acids with their Shikimate pathways (a kind of biological factory that produces amino acids or their building blocks) that the human body, like other animals, lacks. The poisons we put on our food can block their ability to produce these amino acids through their Shikimate pathways, making the foods we eat lacking in the essential amino acids our bodies require for good health. Now, if all of this already sounds rather dire, strap yourself in.

Dying for a Bite

The millions of tons of poisons we spray on our foods don’t just go onto our pests or weeds (unfashionable plants). The majority of the poisons sprayed on our food leaches into our environments, killing the microbes in the soil we need to grow nutritious food, thus rendering much of our soil unsuitable for growing nutritious crops. As the vast majority of these poisons run into the soil and then the water table, rivers and oceans, we end up drinking, as well as eating them. We can even breathe in these poisons as they evaporate into the air, then fall in the rain to coat us and even our organic foods, rendering them no longer organic.

Ironically, the very things that can remove these poisons from our environment are the microbes and fungi that these poisons kill. If we stopped poisoning our food, then, given half a century or so, we might reduce these poisons from a toxic level within our environments, but, of course, their overuse is far too profitable to stop using, and profits for the few tend to come before the welfare of all under a hierarchy

In the same way drugs are used to deplete our bodies in order to cause new problems that another drug will treat, that in turn will cause new problems that another drug will treat, and so on, the way we treat the soil we grow our food in goes through a similar process. We poison the soil and then put more poisons into the soil to try and counter the previous poisoning, and so on. It is a wonderfully profitable system for the corporations that sell the poisons, but no good for producing healthy, nutritious foods.

With more life forms in a single handful of fertile soil than all the human beings on the whole planet, we can understand how devastating these poisons can be on the microbes that much of life on earth relies on. This microbial genocide results in many of the foods we now produce having a fraction of the nutrients they once contained, because we are destroying the microbiome our soil needs. Minerals are a large part of our nutritional needs, and no animal or plant produces all of their own mineral requirements, so we get them mostly from the soil our foods grow in. The microbes our profiteers are at war with are essential in nutrient availability and cycling in healthy soil.

As our bodies require around 20 essential minerals, we can understand how important mineral-rich soil is to our health. The bacteria and fungus in soil helps to enrich the plants that grow in it by predigesting the minerals they and we require, but as the soil in many parts of the world is becoming increasingly barren of life and the minerals they produce, we are making our soil unsuitable to grow crops due to our use of poisons, as well as our other destructive practices that contribute to soil degradation. If it takes a thousand years to produce three inches of topsoil and modern farming is losing it up to 30 to 40 times faster than it can be replenished, we can clearly understand that modern farming is unsustainable using today’s practices.

With modern farming hooked on phosphates, the wars for phosphate resources for our food and energy will no doubt continue for some time to come. We all come from the dirt beneath our feet, and we will all go back to it (unless we are so miserable that we encase ourselves in metal boxes, to avoid the minerals that gave us life, being reused by our fellow life forms), so harming our soil is harming ourselves. We are more than capable of solving these issues with the knowledge we already possess, never mind researching for new knowledge and developing new innovations.

Korean natural farming methods that use microbes, bacteria and fungi to heal soil and grow incredibly nutrient rich food, is an example of a more eco-friendly way to produce foods that help us, rather than harm us. What some call terra preta, a man made soil used for thousands of years, proves our ancestors knew how to turn barren soil into fertile soil, to increase crop production in ways that shame our modern-day practice of the mass poisoning of our environments. There are endless individuals in our past and present that worked/work with our environments instead of against them. Viktor Schauberger, who used copper to harness nature’s energies to aid our environments and increase crop production, is just one of many. If our will to produce highly nutritious foods was as strong as our will to elevate the worth of a few above that of the many, then we would already have such food.

The poisons we put in and on our foods not only weakens and riddles us with diseases, but they do the same to the plants we wish to eat. So, could stopping the poisoning of our foods, possibly be the solution to this problem our corporate masters came up with? Yeah, you guessed it….NO! Where’s the profit in that. Instead, their solution was to take our foods and alter their genetics so that they are resistant to the poisons these corporations profit from. Many plants are now genetically engineered (GE) to serve the interests of our corporations’ profit margins, rather than our nutritional needs. With our crops engineered to metabolise the poisons they are drenched in, they are absorbing these poisons, meaning they can’t be washed off, no matter how much bicarbonate of soda we steep them in, leading to us consuming even more of the poisons.

Let us just take a moment to bask in this wonder of lunacy that only those drenched in greed could have come up with. It’s akin to paying people to go around breaking others peoples legs with hammers, or something equally capable of breaking bones, and instead of a logical solution to this “problem” being stop paying people to go around hitting people with hammers, we instead decide that genetically modifying our leg bones to heal in half the time, in order for a few to profit from both the hammer sales and GM bone sales, as a reasonable solution to a self-inflicted problem. Yep, greed is good.

We could argue that the ability to genetically engineer our crops in itself is not inherently bad. For example, we could use this ability to add real medicinal properties to our foods as well as nutrients that are harder to come by. But we are dealing with our social hierarchies level of malice and playing with genetics can always have unforeseen consequences. When GE crops and all their seeds are owned by a corporation to exert their control over world markets and to steal land from farmers, we should not hold our breath waiting for GE crops to stop being used to harm people. One such example of the level of malice and greed we encounter is that many genetically modified seeds are engineered to not sprout successive generations of plants, in order to deny farmers the ability to regrow crops year after year, meaning farmers must continually buy overpriced seeds from the corporations that claims to own them.

This planned obsolescence of nature itself is only possible within cultures of greed, and is no doubt set to become ever more extreme the more we give control over ourselves and the world we live in to a few glorified wrongdoers. Foods poisoned with pseudo-vaccines are already being sold as a great way to enrich the few. Selling them as edible vaccines may lead to most having little choice but to consume their master’s bitter pills of tyranny, regardless of the mass harm and death it causes.

GE crops have been used for decades to steal farmland all around the world by our sockmakers GE crop industry. This practice involves planting their GE crops near, or next to, their targeted farmland in order to have their seeds blown (or thrown) into the non-GE farms they wish to steal. By claiming the farmers they target of “illegally” using their GE crops, these corporations, with their lawyer heavy teams of wrongdoers, can use their corrupt legal system to do what it is designed to do, and steal from the many to give to the few. As few farmers can afford to even have anything that resembles a fair hearing, these corporations end up “winning” and bankrupting their victims in order to steal their property from them. This practice has destroyed many families, homes, incomes and lives.

As a result of our acceptance of these greedy wrongdoers and the crippling debts they impose upon their victims, many farmers have committed suicide due to our cultures of greed treating them so badly. Populations dying of hunger on mass because they couldn’t protect their food from the greed of a few is a practice we repeat often. When all the world’s farmland is owned by one corporation or group, it may be too late to remove poisoned food from our diets. It is farmers who build civilization and help them grow, not social hierarchies or their enforcers who peddle in harm and destruction. We should not have corporate stooges who are only interested in enhancing their personal wealth, dictating how we grow our food if we want healthy nutritious food. Our farmers and gardeners have an abundance of knowledge on how to grow healthy nutritious foods, but they may lack the bribing skills or means that are required to have their voices heard by any social hierarchy.

Since the mass introduction of heavily poisoned and genetically modified foods into our food chains in the chemical age, we have seen a dramatic increase in ill health from the foods we eat within our populations. Between the poisons we put on our foods, and the resulting lack of nutrition and medicinal properties we receive from these poisoned foods, we fail to nourish or protect the membranes of our organs.

With the huge increase in health conditions such as dementias, like Alzheimer’s, especially in females and Parkinson’s, especially among males, as well as autism, cancers, depression, thyroid diseases, diabetes, allergies…etc., in the last 30 years of our practice in the mass poisoning of our food, it is difficult for most of us to avoid the consequences of this greed-driven practice. With most of our crops now poisoned by the chemical industry, it has led to these foods causing many inflammatory diseases, which have now become the number one cause of death around the world, even outdoing the regular forms of mass killing that hierarchies love to inflict upon their slaves.

Chronic inflammation within populations that consume these poisoned foods is normal, as inflammation is a normal biological response to injury. With health industries that care more for profit than health, their solution to the problem is not addressing the source of the problem, but instead to increase the sales of more drugs. Killing people slowly with poisons is nothing new, as many murderers have used this tactic to avoid suspicion of their deeds for a long time. But the mass murders that those who hide behind corporations inflict using the same slow poisoning tactic is a relatively recent practice that appears to be escalating. So many are robbed of their lives and their loved ones just because we put wealth before health, and with the delaying tactics that many murderous corporations deploy to extend their profitable killing sprees, we will no doubt see many more of us harmed by their greed.

With nutritional deficiencies playing a huge role in our poor health, and even though many are well aware that human nutrition is a science of its own, our modern cultures of greed keep pumping out tons of low-nutritious foods and even stuff that has such little to no nutritional value that it should not even be defined as food. Real healthy food takes time to grow and cultivate, whereas low to zero nutritious stuff that is sold as food is made with the cheapest of ingredients, with many of them being made in a factory or laboratory rather than in nature. As with everything under a social hierarchy, science itself is under their control and willing to sell itself to the highest bidder. This allows our hierarchies to champion any scientific authority that is prepared to sell any lie they wish, while discrediting those with more integrity.

As a result, we get scientists with integrity declaring a product as being harmful to health one day, and then scientists who have taken bribes, declaring the very same product to be beneficial to health the next, or vice versa. This endless lying for easy profits leads to many within such scientific communities who will prostitute themselves for corporations to declare nutritious foods that we have always eaten as being bad in order to sell less nutritious and harmful products.

As an example, many have been convinced that butter with its saturated fat is bad for our health, while believing “spreads” or margarine, that is full of trans-fats from having hydrogen pumped into the oils that are made in a refinery, is a much healthier option, despite the fact that trans-fats rarely occur in nature, so our bodies do not possess the ability to break them down safely, making them hazardous to our health. Trans-fats disrupts our body's ability to metabolize essential fatty acids, increase our risk of heart disease, as well as an array of other health risks, so pass the butter, please.

While on the subject of trans-fats and their effects on our health, the vilification of cholesterol is an example of how these industries make up reasons to justify the sales of their products. We use our cholesterol when the sun hits our skin, as it is an essential part in our biological process to make vitamin D. We have over 900 receptors in our body for vitamin D. That’s how crucial it is to our health. Cholesterol is in every cell wall in our bodies to make them waterproof, and it also forms testosterone, estrogen and other hormones, so drugs that reduce our cholesterol can wreak havoc with our natural and sexual functions.

When someone has heart disease, cholesterol plays a part in trying to heal the damage, so when someone dies of what we call heart disease, they can have more cholesterol than normal because it was trying to address the problem of heart disease. It’s akin to blaming a doctor who was trying to save a patient who had been shot for killing them, simply because they were present when they died. Cholesterol is sold as a problem that needs to be fixed with drugs like statins. Statins are sold as a drug to prevent heart attacks by reducing cholesterol, and even though they do reduce cholesterol, we could argue that they themselves not prevent heart attacks, as many things can reduce our cholesterol. So what is the point of them other than to feed the greed of a few?

In fact, many studies have shown low cholesterol is associated with an increased chance of death, cancer, up to a 50% risk in birth defects, aggressiveness, kidney failure and peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage), while statin drugs have been linked to dementia, so it seems like these industries are creating problems where there are none for way too many people. If lowering our risk of heart attacks and strokes is our goal, then the act of regularly donating blood shows in some studies up to a 75-80% decreased risk of such events. When it comes to many of the drugs these industries of greed peddle in, we could argue that if it were not for the placebo effect and its ability to help us overlook harmful effects, as well as the status of their salespeople, their use would drastically fall.

Anyway, back to nutritional deficiencies. Let’s explore vitamin D as an example. This vitamin (or hormone, as stated previously) is very important in many of our biological functions, so a deficiency can play a huge role in our quality and length of life, and arguably deserves more respect than it gets from our modern health systems. Most of us get the bulk of our vitamin D from sunlight and diet, so such a deficiency is not just dietary related but environmental too. The balance between our need for vitamin D and our need to protect ourselves from ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a challenge we place on our melanin production. Therefore, our skin darkens or lightens as a response to our environments to aid in this balancing act.

Melanin is a wonder of nature we all benefit hugely from, even if our differing levels of it equates to our differing worth in the minds of those ignorant of its wonder. The differing UV levels around the planet can add very real health concerns when we migrate over great distances, as many of us do. The levels of melanin we produce are adaptations to our environments, so when we switch from a low UV part of the world to a high one or vice versa, we can suffer from the effects of a change in our environment. If we have high melanin as a protective result of living in a high UV environment and go to a low UV environment, our high melanin can work against us to hinder our ability to produce vitamin D at the same levels as before, similarly from going in the other direction, our low melanin limits our ability to deal with a high UV environment.

Vitamin D-rich foods become more important in low UV areas of our planet than high UV areas, as these more wintery parts of the world induce seasonal vitamin D deficiencies. As many work indoors, much of modern city life leaves us in the shade away from our rays of sunshine, and with the whole social status thing around nakedness, we further limit our surface area for producing vitamin D with.

Then there are our more oppressive cultures that force females in particular to cover every part of themselves, in order to appease the male desire to rape and as a way of passing the blame of a male wrong onto their victims. This behaviour can greatly limit females of their chance to produce adequate levels of vitamin D. As one nutrient can require the presence of another in order to aid its absorption, we can understand the importance of a varied diet. Being disconnected from nature can damage our health as much as a low nutrition-diet can, so sometimes all we need is to get out more and feel the warmth of the sun on our skin.

When we put profits ahead of reason to satisfy the more-than/less-than ignorances of a few, we can’t be too surprised that this is going to lead to cheap nutritionally void food stuff being fed to those deemed less-than, while more-thans get the pick of nutritious foods. Nutrition is a science that is as consistent as any other science that is free from manipulation, but for those who value the never-ending conveyor belt of commercials that masquerade as scientific studies into nutrition, it can appear to change on an almost daily basis.

As the need to feed the greed of a few infects every aspect of social hierarchies, the scientific fields of these cultures can proclaim their objectivity as much as they like, but they too are subjected to the trappings of these social systems. Social hierarchies use scientists like any other proclaimed authority to legitimise any lie that benefits them, in the same way they use their imaginary gods to claim their interests match with some higher authority. Scientists, like the well-paid liars who sell themselves as experts in finance, economics, law, journalism, health or any other field, are used to deceive the slave classes in the same way.

As a result, we get this never-ending conveyor belt of self-proclaimed experts being used to constantly contradict the truth, in an attempt to cause enough confusion that will sell the products they are being paid to promote. Thus, one day a food source is healthy, then the next day it is not, and this nonsense is only tolerated because the truth has little value within such cults. As all of our social hierarchies systems prize corruption, it is easy for our mass murderers who hide behind corporations to continue their genocidal practices on many of the world’s populations, by simply denying scientific facts, even when such facts are long established.

Millions, if not billions of people, are put at risk as long as our wrongdoers can profit from the practice. With all their high-status nodding heads and clapping hands on the payroll, those who harm so many can rest assured of not facing any consequences from their actions. Within the greed is good mentality of social hierarchies, they can have their scientific communities 100% certain on a product’s harmfulness to human health and have that knowledge well documented, but only a few “expert” scientists are needed to sell out their profession, and with the help of the lying industries, enough doubt can be placed in the minds of a population conditioned to value status over truth.

Trust Me, I’m a Liar

Speaking of the lying industries conspiring to harm for profit, we can’t let one of the most recent worldwide health frauds go by without a mention. The Covid-19 pandemic is a popular example of how little respect our social hierarchies have for the lives of the populations they oppress. Their facades of laws, rights, morality, finance, trade, political autonomy and even just basic decent humanity all fell away to expose their true faces to many of even the most contented of slaves. With many being harmed by their endless lies, greed, ignorances and fearmongering, not to mention the always on offer hatred and persecution for anyone who challenges their lies, our glorified wrongdoers maintained their tradition of profiting greatly from the suffering and deaths of many.

Going for a walk, breathing in fresh air, feeling a ray of sunshine on our skin, going from A to B, meeting family or friends, hugging and even standing close to someone all became “illegal” for the slave classes, but as usual, these legal codes were magically transformed into “guidelines” for the master classes. It is much easier to manipulate an ignorant population using hysteria than knowledge.

Using the hysteria fed by our glorified wrongdoers and their armies of minions to encourage people to demoniseanyone with a basic understanding of biology, as well as an understanding of social hierarchies, led to many being vilified for respecting their own bodies. The lying industries churned out the same orchestrated dogma word for word, as part of their religious practices to their gods of greed, always willing to repeat any lie they are told to chant, all over the world, to encourage as many as they could to be injected with an experimental and deadly, but highly profitable drug.

Sensible human beings who understood what a vaccine was and wasn’t, or had no desire to fill their bodies with a cocktail of untested chemicals, were rebranded as crazy anti-vaxers who had to be treated as dangerous terrorists. Many were ridiculed, had their businesses ruined, sacked from their jobs, arrested and assaulted for exercising the basic human right of choosing what they do or don’t want in their bodies.

How anyone who refuses to take something that is not a vaccine can be labelled as being against vaccines is like saying someone who eats fish that are real fish, and not “fish” that are made of onions, is against fish or is an anti-fisher. Perhaps some of us may be convinced to believe that eating fish-shaped onions is the same as eating real fish, but this is the kind of nonsense that gains value within our cultures of ignorance. A pseudo-vaccine that does not immunise against a pathogen is not a vaccine, just as a pseudo-fish made from onions is not a fish.

Basic common sense is always an enemy of our glorified wrongdoers, so even though we have many within our health industries who would have handled Covid-19 vastly more efficiently if their knowledge was championed as much as our glorified liars were, our cultures of greed sided with the mass profiteering of a few over public health, as they tend to do. Within a system that worships social status and wealth more than knowledge, a responsible and rational response to anything must always bow to greed. When it comes to an honest and well-balanced approach to anything, our social hierarchies are highly inefficient, as they constantly lie and exaggerate their knowledge while downplaying or denying their ignorances and wrongdoings, in order to partake in their social elevating practices of passing blame and claiming credit.

Social hierarchies must go through the pretence of caring for human life in order to exploit their obedient slaves’ ignorances, and in some ways, we either have to give them credit for pulling off such an obvious lie or accept that most people just really don’t care enough about others that much. Many may feel they are helpless or are just too preoccupied with their own needs, but our cultures of greed always encourage their slaves not to give a damn about their fellow human beings, unless they have status, of course. The Covid-19 pandemic is just another example of this pretence of valuing life, morals or even justice, as hunger, for example, is vastly more deadly man-made tool of murder than Covid-19 to human beings, with around 25,000 people dying of hunger every day, not to mention millions more who go malnourished daily and the resulting consequences to health this causes.

Hunger requires no research into a solution, nor any drug or vaccine, as we already know the cure. We just have to let people eat, instead of impoverishing them and destroying tons of food to serve the interests of a few. Few individuals involved within a social hierarchy have to concern themselves with hunger, as serving their interests is all that matters.

As infectious diseases care little for our ignorance of differing worth, they are vastly more of a threat to more-thans than hunger could ever be, hence the need for hysteria at infections and not hunger. The true number of deaths from Covid-19 is still up for debate. The huge drops in natural flu deaths or anything else for that matter, suggests that many who may have died of flu, died instead of our manufactured Covid-19 virus or the “treatments” used by our dealers in death. We also know that Covid-19 death rates were exaggerated in order to justify the hysterical response to it, as well as increase the drug industry’s profits.

The need to exaggerate the fatalness of Covid-19 and other factors, would explain somewhat of any discrepancy in claimed Covid-19 deaths to overall death rates. To complicate matters further, we must also factor in those who may have lost their lives unnecessarily as a result of shutting down our communities, which drastically limited access to health care and other restrictions that impacted our health, not to mention the impact on mental health from isolation or the restrictions on basic freedoms. Vitamin D deficiency was understood very early on to play a large role in how severe people would be effected by Covid-19, yet our glorified wrongdoers were telling, as well as forcing people to stay indoors in order to avoid a free source of vitamin D that would aid their health.

No corporation makes huge profits from people getting natures free health boosters, and we should not rule out the possibility of our descendants being forced to buy a licence to make them worthy enough to feel the sun on their skin. Criminalising people for getting some fresh air and essential vitamin D from the sun was just one of the injustices faced by the slave classes, while their masters did what they wished. Then, of course, there is the lunacy of claiming that their highly profitable experimental drugs (or pseudo-vaccines) are safe and effective. The only thing they were safe in was ensuring huge wealth for a few and effective at robbing millions of people of their freedoms, wealth, health and lives.

Any vaccine that needs to be constantly “topped up” is not a vaccine. How vaccine “boosters” were even suggested and not met with mass ridicule is a sad reflection of just how ignorant our hierarchal societies really are. With the added effect of causing myocarditis and clots (among other health risks from the so-called treatment that harmed and killed many), it can be difficult to filter through to the real mortality effects of the Covid-19 virus alone. Many deaths during Covid-19 that had nothing to do with the virus, as we know, many were registered as deaths from Covid-19 in a bid to coerce people into taking a pseudo-vaccine. Some of our homicidal profiteers manipulated the death rates to make it appear like “unvaccinated” people were dying much more than “vaccinated” people.

Many people who took a pseudo-vaccine and caught Covid-19 from it or afterwards, only to die of Covid-19 or the vaccine within 4 weeks, had their deaths classed as unvaccinated in order to maintain the pretence that a pseudo-vaccine could actually immunise anyone against a pathogen, and perhaps mask the true instigator of their death. Only those who survived 4 weeks or more after taking these pseudo-vaccines and their “boosters” were classed as vaccinated. Knowing that people were most at risk of dying from these “vaccines” within the first few weeks of taking them, we can understand why it was necessary for those who profited from these drugs, to practice such lies and manipulations in order to aid their wealth grab.

Classifying deaths from other causes as a Covid-19 death, and all the other practices that our glorified wrongdoers engage in helped to inflate the risk and severity of Covid-19 and the effectiveness of their “treatment” to facilitate their agendas. If we ignore our masters lying for a moment and go by the World Health Organisation (WHO) figures, there was less than 7 million deaths from Covid-19 virus in the 4 years from its initial outbreak. We must bear in mind that the WHO, as a branch of the UN, is owned by our lovely sockmakers, therefore are no strangers in battling with the truth. So absolute no chance of any lies or manipulation happening there then.

So, for the sake of argument, we will enter a fantasy world where social hierarchies are honest and trustworthy. If we are to say 7 million Covid-19 deaths is accurate, and when over 9 million people starve to death every year, then that is 36 million dead from hunger within the same period of time. Are the lives of 36 million people who starve to death worth less than 7 million lives lost from an infectious disease or harmful drug? According to our social hierarchies, apparently so, as no high-status folk die of hunger.

Our social hierarchies are willing to shut down the world for profit and in order to protect themselves from catching a disease. So while they destroy crops with their weather weapons and chemicals, and organise food supplies to ensure millions starve to death, many slaves value the lie that their masters care for them in some way. We waste billions of tons of food every year just to enrich a few and starve slaves into obedience, so we have the food but not the will to share it. Instead, lies like we need to send money to this group and that group, are sold as solutions to a problem that has always been part and parcel of the practices that social hierarchies’ value. Money is always our status seeker’s answer to everything, as their status is based upon it, but feeding their greed is the solution to nothing.

During the pandemic, we could not make enough money to maintain the order of our master/slave cultures, and while the frauds of the stock markets and financial industries were closed down to sever their master plan to hook their victims onto their monopolise our digital MOE, our hierarchies economists were nowhere to be seen to explain their usual deliberate overly complex and hypocritical economic drivel of how monopolised markets are wonderful at creating wealth, to justify the few having more than the many. Instead, despite commerce almost grinding to a halt, money was no object when it came to protecting the delicate species of the master classes as they funnelled even more of the world’s wealth in their direction, while most were confined and herded into their homes.

When it came to the pay structure of staying at home, less-thans were given little to do nothing, and more-thans were given much more for doing the exact same thing in order to maintain the social inequality that all social hierarchies value and have spent centuries building. Thus, even when almost all contribute nothing equally, unequal rewards are maintained.

As only our less-thans die of hunger, we are encouraged to ignore such things or not give a damn about the lives of less-thans. But if a more-than dies in old age of natural causes, then every status seeker must at least feign sorrow in order to be seen as a respectable member of their superficial society. Orchestrated poverty and hunger encourage obedience among the slave classes, and have always been inflicted upon them to exert control over them. These are tools social hierarchies have and will always use to make famine more common in “civilized” cultures that hate to share, than in cultures that are more adept at sharing.

Our hierarchies and sockmakers have played a big role in starving millions of people in order to establish control over populations. With some of their most deadly in the last few hundred years killing between an estimated 60 and 125 million people in China, India and Russia/Ukraine alone, as well as the orchestrated famine in Ireland (to name but a few), it is fair to say our sockmakers depopulation programs are very popular among each generation of sockmaker. Many of our master’s famines are hidden within their fogs of war, as this comes with more acceptability in the minds of obedient slaves.

When we add the more recent starvation programs of the populations not too keen on being overly obedient debt slaves, like in Yemen, Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan, Sudan, Gaza, and of course Ethiopia, which still endured many famines since successfully resisting our sockmakers’ servitude, it is not difficult to see the practice of starvation being used by those who desire to be more-than. As long as the few are worth more than the many, we will always struggle to move food from A to B when B is on our sockmaker’s blacklist. With weather modification tools being used as weapons to cause droughts and floods to disrupt or even destroy the crops of any bad debt slave nation, starvation is a practice that has become easier for our mass murderers and will no doubt continue to happen to those who say no to our sockmakers.

The fact that Covid-19 was man-made and with many even working on producing a more fatal version, it is no great stretch to theorise that our glorified wrongdoers will use a similar tactic in the future to help fulfil their malicious intent to be more-than. Social hierarchies have a long history of using biological warfare against those they wish to dominate, and the fact that the majority of populations around the world valued the blatant lies and contradictions their glorified wrongdoers used to manipulate them into blind obedience only encourages further use of this practice. Watching people declare they are free while championing their own servitude to a few, even when at the same time that few are imprisoning them for going for a walk, is always worth a giggle, but during the Covid-19 pandemic, even this source of contradictory amusement became too extreme.

Telling others to value freedom and not leave their home (those that had one) in the same breath allowed many of even the most obedient slaves to question the liars they trust. With the ease in which most populations happily conceded their basic freedoms and rights (of the few they had), as well as demonizing those less willing to abandon sanity in favour of hysteria, it may not be long before we are having our plandemics sponsored by those who have created them. Maybe next time we will have a real vaccine ready, and by pricing out the poor, we can use this practice as an effective culling method to ensure slave populations become even more compliant than they already are.

It is no coincidence that after the lockdowns, a percentage of many populations did not want to go back to their jobs of servitude to feed the greed of a glorified few, especially among those who were paid the same to do nothing all day as they were to work all day. Maybe it sparked a little understanding of the fraud that is a monopolised medium of exchange and its associated industries, as well as the nonsense of spending a lifetime chasing another man’s socks.

Perhaps with a small taste of freedom from the daily grind their dictators expect of them, many came to break with their hierarchies conditioning and indoctrination to realise there is more to life than the nonsense of feeding the greed of a few. Our glorified wrongdoers did what they always do when they don’t have enough slaves to serve their interests, by creating more slaves with their manufactured inflation and “cost of living crisis” to inflict poverty among their slave classes in order to bring them back in line with their wishes. That and the always popular needless warring, of course.

Post-Covid-19, parts of the world with an abundance of food were told there was a food crisis, while those with an abundance of energy were told there was an energy crisis. All this while they were exporting their excess food and energy. The magical ability to produce any amount of money with the pressing of a key, which was exercised to excess during the lockdowns to pay people to stay at home, suddenly and miraculously disappeared.

As all the fraud industries opened back up, their economists were again rolled out to declare whatever they were told to declare by their masters. So they parroted all the usual doom and gloom necessary to convince discontented slaves to obey their master’s wishes. So, with the hysterical response to the threat of a virus with a fatality rate of less than 1% ebbing away, and the mission of scaring their slaves into using their digital MOE complete, it was time to get their slaves back to feeding their greed, as the everyday business of mass wrongdoing got back into full production for our hierarchies.

The Covid-19 debacle is just one example where our glorified wrongdoers sold a narrative to gain acceptance of a fraud that they profited from, no matter the cost to those they wronged, a practice every social hierarchy engages in on a daily basis. Deceivers encouraged their believers to reduce science to just another belief system, where their masters are the saviours, of course. Glorified wrongdoers telling their contented slaves not to question them and instead to believe in the science or scientist of those who prove almost daily that they know and care little about science, is always funny, as the very nature of science is the pursuit of truth and something to be scrutinised in great detail, not something to be believed in.

Our glorified wrongdoers cannot help themselves in trying to monopolise everything. So even the very field of science, that is supposed to encourage and stand up to vigorous questioning to eliminate the need for any belief system in favour of truth, falls to our liars. However, as hierarchal cultures are far from a group that values truths, the need to transform lies into beliefs are always going to be there. There have always been many established beliefs within social hierarchies’ science that are largely based on the wealth and status of those proclaiming their beliefs as truths, and no doubt there always will be.

As Covid-19 had a very low death rate, and with a drug that did nothing to help anyone from catching the virus being accepted by the majority of people on the planet to enrich a few, our glorified wrongdoers can only imagine the profits to be made with a more deadly virus that actually has a vaccine that works. No doubt we will always have some people somewhere working on such a business model, as mass genocide has always been a lucrative business for social hierarchies.

With around 80% of our hierarchies’ populations taking a Covid-19 “vaccine”, it fits very neatly into the percentage of belongers within our groups. The percentages of suggestibility played out very accurately when it came to convincing people to value the lies of a pseudo-vaccine, as it does with many other lies. The sciences will always be distorted to fit into our ignorances and our nature, but luckily, there will always be at least that 20% of us who have more interest in understanding than belonging.

Forever in our Hearts, Lungs, Brains, Liver…

While on the subject of useless to harmful things, let’s look at our so-called health regulators who are supposed to ensure the products we consume and use are safe, but, of course, regularly fail, as we would expect within any culture of greed that highly values corruption. When wealth and status are up for grabs, for most there is no such thing as right and wrong, especially in cultures that glorify wrongdoers and vilify victims.

Let’s take one example (from so, so many) of how harming people for profit can continue even when these self-proclaimed health regulators make attempts to justify their existence. A Chemical known as Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA or c8 for short) was used for almost 70 years in many industries and sold as “safe and effective” despite being poisonous and linked to many health conditions. So after decades of death, harm, denial, and vast profits, it eventually gets banned as a danger to health and the environment.

For the few who hide behind our corporations that made huge profits from this harmful chemical to maintain their income streams, all it took was a tweaking of this chemical cocktail and a rebranding to GenX to get those profits rolling back in. Now GenX is sold to be as “safe and effective” as PFOA was for much of its life, and all is good in the world again. As long as the few profit as much as possible, and “health officials” who also make huge profits from these industries keep declaring GenX as officially safe, it will flood our environments.

This is just one example from thousands of chemicals pumped into our environments, and shows how those who profit from harming many can hide behind the fiction of a corporation, and how easy it is to maintain their profits and social status even after they have caused much harm by playing chemical roulette. Chemicals such as PFOA are what some term “forever chemicals” as they take thousands of years to break down, and are used within many products.

So banning them may reduce or stop their production, but not the effects they have on our health, as they are going to be around for a long time. Many if not all of us, will have some of these chemicals in our bodies, and these chemicals that harm us today may still be around in a few thousand years to harm the health of generations of our descendants. So they are a gift that keeps on giving.

Another consequence of the toxic chemicals and pollutants we consume and spew into our environments, is the decline of our fertility. Over the last 50 years, our fertility has plummeted in no small part due to the vast amounts of chemicals we inflict upon ourselves (for the greed of a few, of course). Male sperm, for example, is known to decline when exposed to many of these chemicals, but a male can recover his sperm count if he avoids these toxins after 3 months (no easy task in some parts of the world). However, any male whose mother consumes or is exposed to these chemicals before they are born can forever have a less than normal sperm count and be more likely to become infertile as a consequence of chemicals that can make males more feminised.

This is not to say that such males are less than others, but only to recognise the chemical differences in males caused by exposure to such environments. One could even argue that with every new generation exposed to this mass poisoning over the last 50 years, males have become more feminised with every generation, and it may play some part in the current need for many males to self-identify as female. Although our sockmakers social manipulation and acceptance of such a thing will always play a role.

The war on testosterone is well armed with its anti-body, estrogen. The high consumption of soya, which is high in estrogen, plays a role in unbalancing our hormones. Additionally, just to compound the problem, the mould that grows from soya is also high in estrogen, and as we feed the animals that we eat with this high estrogen food, we get it in the meat we eat, even if we try to avoid soya food products. We must also factor in the estrogen from drugs like female contraceptives.

If only around 10% is being absorbed by the body, most of this estrogen is urinated out into the water supply, and we use a lot of water. Then there are the estrogen chemicals found in many products, the estrogen in soaps and body washes, for example, are absorbed into the body through our skin. With our high exposure to estrogen through our food, water, cleaning products, pesticides, plastics, perfumes,…etc., and males behaving more feminine and even identifying as female altogether, perhaps it won’t be a man’s world for much longer. Although it’s more likely to be just another more-than male ploy to reduce competition.

From a social hierarchal perspective, the feminisation of males could be argued to be a good strategy for high-status males to maintain their status, by subjecting their competition to a dramatic reduction in testosterone. Maleness itself has become something to attack in some quarters, unless, of course, the males in question are glorified wrongdoers or their obedient minions. Estrogen controls many aspects of our health in both women and men, including glucose balance, lipid homeostasis, brain function, and bone metabolism.

An excess of estrogen is not only a threat to males’ health but females also, adding to the risk of weight gain, osteoporosis, thyroid disorders and cancers, to name a few of the hazards to our health this problem imposes. With our hormones playing key roles in our health and functions, a hormone imbalance can affect us in many ways, and with our foods coming with extra hormones to enrich our synthetic chemical producers, we risk disturbing this balance when we consume these foods.

With the prolific use of our chemicals being accepted by our hierarchies slave populations, despite the known damage to our environments and the health of all life on earth, it begs the question, is there more to these products being inflicted upon the world other than the usual motivation of greed? As they affect fertility and hormone balance, perhaps that is the effect our glorified wrongdoers desire.

These effects aid in the overpopulated planet ideology valued by many status seekers, so this is one way of culling the less-thans from the populations of the world without facing any opposing army that may not be too keen on their families being wiped out. The combination of the rise in low fertility and gender confusion will aid in such a goal, and the fact that many hierarchies around the world are telling their political puppets to push the endless genders idea, while condemning anyone with enough common sense to understand nature to such a great depth of insight that they know what constitutes a female, proves yet another conspiring effort from our glorified wrongdoers.

If we spent half the amount of our time, resources and wealth on developing good, nutritious food production, as we spend on harming and murdering one another, we could easily sustain larger populations as well as a much higher quality of life for all than the low standard that is all too common today. If those who believe there are too many people on the planet and are entrenched in the idea of reducing the population as a remedy, really had any courage of convictions, then surely their own suicide would fulfil their own ideology without affecting those not so ignorant.

This may allow the rest of us to take advantage of our population size instead of demonizing it, to achieve things that status seekers can’t even dream of. A cynical mind may theorise that there is a malicious intent from our champions of malice to hamper the fertility of the slave classes, as well as profiting from “fertility treatments”, as machines replace their slaves more and more each day, but when all our sockmakers minions are bragging about how wonderfully advanced there are at using viruses, drugs, foods, tools and technology to fulfil their depopulation agenda, no cynicism is necessary.

With millions of less-than females enduring forced sterilization and forced abortions, and millions of less-than men and women being paid to be sterilized, it is clear that our more-than masters don’t want their less-than slaves breeding too much. Compound this with our hierarchal narratives of convincing less-thans that they are too poor to breed, and we can get very different attitudes towards big families based on status from these ignorant societies. We are not the only species whose fertility is on the decline, as we share our increasingly poisoned environments with many other species.

The fertility industry will no doubt grow, and as there is evidence that even males created with the aid of such treatments have low sperm counts in adulthood, combined with our toxic environments, populations may plummet without the assistance of any sockmakers army of murderers getting their hands too bloody. Many may believe that population decline is a good thing, but they are heavily influenced by their glorified wrongdoer’s mentality of social status, where some are more than others. So if the less-thans become less, then all the more for the more-thans, seems to be the ethos of our status seekers who are blind to the abilities and potential of all.

Hierarchies have always forced their interests and control onto their slave classes reproduction, whether they are discouraging it to limit any reduction on their overabundant share of resources, as a somewhat glorified ethnic cleansing of the poor, or encouraging it to increase their armies due to expansion or mass losses. It’s always about the effects on them. As machines take over the labour of slaves and even serve the sexual needs of the master classes, many status seekers may champion their latest series of genocides and their future planned ones as a necessity, as long as they are not the ones being wiped out, of course.

Population decline may not be seen as a problem for those deemed more-than, but large populations can easily be a good thing and advantageous if we ever had a culture that valued each individual equally. Although no social hierarchy will ever take advantage of the collective intelligence of any population, as they are too focused on serving their own base desires, by limiting our populations, we limit the potential chances of increasing our knowledge, understanding and problem-solving. But as this is the norm in today’s world, there may be few too concerned about such a loss of potential.

Anyway, to go back to Covid-19 for a moment, let’s take a stab at how the monopolizing of biological weapons that masquerade as cures led to this event. The coronavirus was isolated in 1965 as an infectious, replicable viral pathogen that could be used by our glorified wrongdoers as a weapon, as they tend to do with everything. A year later, in 1966, the first step to what would lead to the Covid-19 release in 2019 took place. The SARS (another pathogen engineered from the coronavirus) outbreak of 2002 may have been a trial run for the Covid-19 plandemic.

With the Covid-19 outbreak beginning in December of 2019 and the first patent for a Covid-19 vaccine being filed on January 20th 2020, it appears that chasing patents is more important than any cure within our cults of differing worth, but it is also likely that they already had their harmful pseudo-vaccines ready to go before the 2019 release.

The first vaccine to be patented was the smallpox vaccine in 1802. Patenting a cure to save millions from death and suffering may appear obscene to many, but not in our cultures of greed. Patents are never done to aid anyone but the few who own them, as well as those needed to be bribed to achieve them and those who monopolise their industries. Playing god with people’s lives is just part of the lunacy that comes with being mired in the delusion of elevated worth.

The desire to be a god is a common affliction in the minds of many status seekers. Although Dr Jonas Salk, who created the polio vaccine, obviously agreed with many less self-aggrandizing folk about hoarding exclusivity of a cure that could save many from death and suffering as a bad thing, as he himself never patented his vaccine, and it still remains widely available for use.

Vaccines have always worked by introducing our bodies to a weakened pathogen in order to cause an immune response to defend against the pathogen. Whereas our life patenting monopolists’ new mRNA-based vaccines work by using synthetically created mRNA molecules that provide genetic instructions for our cells, so absolutely no concern there then.

Who doesn’t mind those who hide behind a profit based entity, feeding them with foreign genes? Deaths from these “vaccines” are denied to align with the endless lies that prop up the whole farce of the Covid-19 genocide, in order to protect all those complicit in its execution. With these deaths being sold as anything other than what they are, our seasoned liars sell notions of unexplainable deaths, sudden deaths or excess deaths as the terms used to avoid addressing the harm and deaths caused by forcing and manipulating many into taking drugs that were at best untested, and at worst known to harm and kill.

With the deaths from the Covid-19 virus being grossly exaggerated and the ever-increasing deaths from the pseudo-vaccines being treated as some kind of taboo subject (for obvious reasons), it begs the question: What is the more deadly of the two, the manufactured virus or the pseudo-vaccines?

With few who profit from these things interested in the answer, we arguably have our answer. With most of us persuaded into taking a pseudo-vaccine containing foreign mRNA that has led to the new common pathology of white fibrous clots in humans, the harm and death from these pseudo-vaccines may continue for some time to come, even if the excess deaths that they cause are ignored by most of our status seekers.

As our culpable hierarchies do what they always do in insuring their wrongs and lies are covered up, they threaten all with any degree of social worth with the usual practices of persecution and character assassination should they even talk about the truth, leading to the usual bizarre nonsense of status seekers using endless words that say nothing. There are always these secrecy laws that all social hierarchies use to hide their wrongs and lies behind for 50 or 100 years or so, in order to ensure all involved in their wrongs and lies get to live out their lives, free to enjoy the rewards of their wrongdoing and avoid any consequences. If the truths about the Covid-19 genocide were to be hidden within these laws, then all involved in the genocide and most of those related or connected to the initial victims would be dead long before the truth is admitted by our seasoned liars.

Social hierarchies rely on believers to add credibility to their lies, so the more believers they can create, the bigger the con they can pull off, as liars alone can often make a lie a hard sell. With hierarchal cultures much more reliant on opinion than truth, they can always buy enough opinions to repeat any lie they wish. The Covid-19 debacle may be a popular example for many where our hierarchies, doctors and scientist put their own interests above the lives of millions of people they pretend to care for, and some may even perceive it as an exception, but this has always been our hierarchal cultures standard practice.

With our modern-day snake oil sales folk being too greedy and/or too ignorant to even question the lies they are told to repeat, such deceptions are the norm within our cultures of hate, not the exception. The Covid-19 farce is just one example of how fearmongering and lies are often enough to strip away the veneer of our pseudo-freedom-loving egalitarians, to expose themselves as the closet totalitarians that will gladly champion gross wrongdoing, that they are. We often pretend that we are something we are not, to ourselves as well as others.

As every industry is riddled with fraud within our cultures of differing worth, our health and scientific industries are no different in defrauding people, as this is encouraged within such cultures to achieve greater social worth. Many scientific studies and trials that conclude the opposite or differing claims of those paying for them are often hidden or ignored to avoid public knowledge of a lie. Lying may be highly valued to maintain social status, but maybe one day our health and nutritional sciences, as well as all the sciences, will get the respect they deserve. However, as long as there are huge profits to be made by disrespecting them, they will continue to be bastardised to suit the narratives that serve corporate interests. Within our cultures that put great value on obvious ignorances, lies and fictions, it is viewed by many as insanity to be sane to the truth.

The unnecessary deaths doctors and others in the health industry cause, regardless of their time and place, is a practice that will always continue as long as there is wealth and status up for grabs. It is not too long ago that doctors were injecting their patients with lead, cocaine and mercury, as well as engaging in the practice of bloodletting, although mercury apparently had some success for doctors at killing the parasitic worms of cancer. Bloodletting, as mentioned earlier, also seems to help in reducing cardiovascular health risks, so maybe modern medicine is just catching up with what our ancestors already knew.

Anyway, this is not to demonise doctors or the health industry, merely to recognise the reality of what happens, as demonising gives us a warped view of reality, just as much as glorifying does. By simply glorifying all involved within the health industry and denying the truth of the harm/help balance, our cultures of greed fail to recognise the issues that lead to the unnecessary harm and deaths of many, never mind the limitations this puts on addressing any of them effectively.

With up to 80% of our populations being susceptible to our glorified wrongdoers’ manipulations, a sane mind must embrace solitude, while insane minds herd together to mock those that are not too keen on sharing their afflictions. The solitude of a sane mind is a price few belongers are willing to pay, but a mind that values lies is going to be more susceptible to mental turmoil when the truth can’t be avoided. Those of us who believe our worth is attached to our social status can allow our belief to alter our health. With those who believe they are less-than, suppressing their biology, and those who believe they are more-than, boosting it, we can see how status seekers are motivated to “win” their biological boosts.

Social status can become a biological addiction in the same way any belief can. Low status in some males, for example, can affect their testosterone, so it is not in the interests of anyone who believes themselves to be a low-status male to value the ignorance of differing worth, or to stay within a group that suffers from it, and can even rise when they leave a group they valued that deems them as less-than. So for those with an inferiority complex, they can improve their testosterone by simply removing an ignorance/belief from either themselves or those around them. For males that don’t suffer from the ignorance of differing worth, their testosterone is unaffected.

The power of belief can aid or hinder us, but the more-than/less-than ignorances do a lot more damage to our collective health, as most have to be classed as less-than within any hierarchy, making social status and the gross inequality it produces a health hazard. With our hierarchies’ tactics of control, division, oppression and belittling of most of their populations to cause the destruction of unity within communities, it is normal for many to succumb to the loneliness and isolation that these cultures rely on to limit their slaves from organising against their oppressors.

The psychological torment inspired by cultures that encourage status seekers to constantly bully and belittle their way along their hierarchies spectrum of differing worth can dampen the spirits of many. However, even when trapped within our cultures of hate, we are capable of immunising our minds from the deluge of ignorances that flows from all who have been conditioned to value such things.

A Depressing Drug Deception

Life breaks us all, and the process of a great psychological loss, sorrow or the metaphoric heartache as we call it, is a very normal experience for any social species that is heavily dependent on its psychology. It is even crucial in developing our understanding, as we learn so much from it. Suicide, or at least its contemplation, and excessive risk-taking can be common when mired in the early stages of the process of a great psychological loss, but most of us get through this period to begin to accept living with the loss, with perhaps a deeper appreciation for life. The trauma of an incident or living with abuse is a far too common staple of all social hierarchies that revere mass wrongdoing, so it is perhaps no surprise that some of the victims of these wrongs go on to contemplate, attempt and commit suicide.

Their lives are just one more waste on the ever-growing scrapheap of waste our glorified wrongdoers create. Incidentally, one of the leading methods of suicide is the use of the very stuff most of us consume in our food. The ingestion of pesticides is used in up to 50% of suicides in some parts of the world, so many of us know these poisons are very good at killing us, even if the “health authorities” who declare them as safe can’t see it from behind the piles of cash obstructing their view.

While we are on suicide, many of us often seek distractions from a psychological pain, as we often attempt to avoid it rather than address it with understanding. We feel what we feel for a reason, so it is always wise to learn from those reasons. Avoidance can prolong the pain, and many distractions can cause other types of harm. Whether we use food, alcohol, drugs or harmful behaviours to escape the pain, this avoidance can stem from our inability to accept or come to terms with the cause of our pain. However, there can also, in part, be a reluctance to move on from the cause, as it may feel like trivialising the cause in some way. Many cultures even decree a certain period of time for the sorrow-stricken to come to terms with their loss.

To go from the time of the cause of a great sorrow, to a time where we are not consumed by it and start to accept that it’s something we will carry with us throughout our lives, can take years or even decades, with the first 18 months to 2 years being arguably the hardest period. Sometimes we can become stuck in the more difficult early stages, especially when experiencing our first great sorrow. If we experience many great sorrows in a short space of time, this can overwhelm us, and for some, suicide can be perceived as a genuine option for relieving the pain.

When we are devoid of joy and absent of even the hope of any future joy, then we can spiral into despair. After all, what is life without joy? With understanding and a focus on a joy, or even the remnants of a joy, no matter how small it may be, we can help ourselves avoid, limit or overcome sorrow or despair. Worldwide we lose almost twice as many people to suicide than we do to murder (low-status murders that is, murdering millions for the profit margins of a corporation is not classed as murder by those who have the blood of many victims on their hands), and we can only guesstimate how many of those suicides are assisted by our glorified wrongdoers’ practices, but it will be a fair number.

Too often, psychological pain is now labelled as some kind of disorder or condition, so rather than addressing the source of the pain, many health industries pander to the philosophy of their invented disorders. There is, of course, a remarkable coincidence with all of these disorders, in that they are almost always paired with a synthetic drugs as part of their philosophies.

Although when those that make the drugs are also the ones that create the disorders, perhaps we should not be too surprised about the nature of these philosophies. If we treated any physical pain in our foot, stomach, throat,.…etc., in the same way by ignoring the source of the pain and branding the sufferer with a disorder, and subject them to the philosophies of any disorder, our ability to cure physical pain would be as bad as our ability to cure psychological pain.

According to our intellectually glorified obedient slaves, we have a depression epidemic. Perhaps they are unaware that depression has always been common among slave populations. Where there’s oppression, there’s depression. Depression can have a domino effect on our health, and in a bid to avoid the obvious causes of discontent, our hierarchies try to convince their slaves that it is their fault, with anything from their genes to a chemical imbalance, used as an excuse to explain slaves’ justifiable discontentment, and masquerade it as a disorder. The idea that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain that can be cured with a drug is, of course, a lie made up by the drug industry in order to sell their useless to harmful chemicals to anyone willing to buy their lies. They may zombify many from their depression at best, but not remedy any issues.

Slaves are rarely happy with their servitude, with the exception of those susceptible to being conditioned into valuing it, or among many high-status slaves, but many of our modern-day debt slaves are understandably unhappy with their life of feeding the greed of a few. Many are told by their masters that they have some kind of mental problem like anxiety, depression, stress or any one of an array of newfound disorders that all come with a convenient patented synthetic drug attached to them. As we tend to change or avoid something we are unhappy with, the practice of blaming their slave’s brains for their inevitable resentment helps hierarchies maintain the status quo.

By convincing many that they are the problem and not the abusive cultures they find themselves in, social hierarchies can maintain enough obedience in most of their slaves to avoid many of the constant rebellions that their wrongdoings have always inspired. The mental and physical toll of being oppressed and having our basic freedoms limited, along with having to alter the very fabric of our human nature, can cause us to feel unhappy. Convincing people they are depressed instead of unhappy, and doping them up with drugs, hierarchies limit their slaves’ desire to address the root of their stolen joys.

Our psychological outlook can have a huge impact on our mental and physical health, as proven by the placebo effect, where we can cure ourselves by thinking we are getting better, and the nocebo effect, where we can cause ourselves harm because we expect to get worse. Therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists and the like are now used to help many struggling with their psychology, but with our superficial cultures of greed destroying communities and any sense of togetherness, these professions profit from the isolation that comes with the oppression, hate and constant divisions within such populations.

The irony of these cultures of exploitation, selling many of their very obedient “experts” as healers of the very same psychological problems that are caused by the mass wrongdoings they support and even engage in, may be lost on many, but not on all. Of course, having someone to aid us through difficulties with drug-free therapy is not necessarily a bad thing, and can even be very beneficial to many, and like any industry, there will be some who are more effective than others in their execution. However, the very deliberate, abusive nature of such cultures does not exactly encourage the well-balanced mental health of a population’s psychology, as all are manipulated to fit into the narratives that serve our glorified wrongdoers.

The psychological damage that many (if not all, to some degree) experience within such cultures is one thing, but brain injuries can have a huge Impact on our mental health and can go unnoticed for years or even a lifetime, as psychiatrists and psychologists often only prescribe drugs based on “learned opinions” (as well as profit margins) instead of taking a good look at the organ responsible for creating our phycology, that may have been damaged. Granted, examining the brain in great detail may only be a relatively recent ability in modern technology, of which we are arguably still in the infancy stages of, so with the pace of social hierarchies as they are, we may be ignoring brain injuries and misdiagnosing them as disorders for quite some time to come.

If we consider how many babies and small children alone hit their heads every day, we can understand that there will be a percentage that could damage their brains enough to cause negative long-term effects, even if it doesn’t render them unconscious or comatose at the time. A damaged brain can cause huge changes in our behaviour as well as what we define as our personality. By correcting any damage to our brain, we can correct any changed behaviour. Just as our other organs can regenerate and heal, so can the damaged brain.

Our glorified wrongdoer’s history of dealing with mental illness is very poor. As we can imagine within such cultures, more-thans will always brand less-thans as crazy, insane or mentally unstable and the like, as part of their manipulation to achieve elevated worth and justify harming others, as well as to avoid any consequences for their actions. For example, when high-status males rape low-status females, they can simply use their overvalued words to explain away the undervalued words of their victims as delusions of those with lesser mental faculties.

Obviously, this is an all too common practice within our master/slave rape-friendly environments, and it is most likely that mental health hospitals or institutions that have not been used in the practice of rape are the exception rather than the rule. By simply challenging an obvious lie, less-thans can find themselves imprisoned and forced into “mental health institutions” to be subjected to the abuses of our malicious status seekers, who feel the need to brand those who question their lies as crazy in order to maintain any elevated worth.

With “treatments” for those declared as mentally disturbed by those who value differing worth, ranging from electrocution to lobotomies, it is fair to question who are the more mentally disturbed, the torturers or their victims. Whatever “treatments” our profit-hungry health industries come up with to enrich themselves, while pretending to address mental health issues, we can be certain there will be a patent or a licence nearby in cultures that inspire “poor mental health”.

Madness is often a numbers game. When most engage in madness, it can be sold as sane to appease the ignorance of the masses mired in madness, just as they can sell a sane act as madness when they outnumber the sane. A psychologically friendly, inclusive culture that values and respects all equally may do more good for the mental health of many mired in our wrongdoer’s paradise than any drug or health industry, but this is hardly an ambition of any social hierarchy.

Celebrating Our Inhumanity

On the subject of pseudo-ambitions, we must touch on the murky world of corporate charities that are used by social hierarchies as a sticking plaster of superficial morality to treat the severed limbs of their populations’ integrity caused by their wrongdoing. Charities are used to appease any potential outrage at the orchestrated wrongdoings and incompetence of our social hierarchies. Let’s take poverty as an example. There are always groups claiming to be charities that tackle poverty, even though we could eliminate it overnight if we wished to, but as poverty is an essential design of social hierarchies, it will never be eliminated, as it is a requirement to maintain the grading of humans in order to justify some harming and exploiting others.

Yet any objection to the gross injustice and inequality of social hierarchies inflicting poverty onto many can be easily subdued in the eyes of many who value the idea of charities, which will at most make a big show of token to futile efforts to solve a contrived endemic problem that is really an integral part of such cultures’ design. There are few wrongs designed by social hierarchies’ that do not come with a charity or a foundation attached to it, and as fraud is the bread and butter of such systems, we should not be too surprised that our glorified wrongdoers use such things to humour their victims’ desire to address any problem.

Many large charities only give a tiny percentage of the income or “donations” they receive to the cause they claim to serve, and less than 1% is not rare, and some even get away with giving 0% to their cause. So that’s 99-100% of funds collected by these so-called charities going into the pockets of those involved in the charity, and we haven’t even touched on the fraud of religions that are experts at exploiting this practice to enrich themselves. The mass thievery that passes as taxation can be waived and traded for public approval by the corporations and individuals that need it the most. So any group that harms and kills millions of people can be sold as wonderful human beings, when they send a tiny fraction of the ill-gotten gains they would have paid in tax anyway, to a charity.

Even when they “donate” back to themselves by owning the charity they use to buy public approval with, they are still seen as somehow morally righteous in the eyes of many who enrich them. Social charities are a sign of a failed society, so they will always be used by social hierarchies to gain support for their built-in structures of wrongdoing. No half-decent community would need any charity to facilitate the basic needs of the group, but no social hierarchy cares for community. They only care for dominating them. Charities and foundations are merely social hierarchies attempting to hide their wrongdoing behind a mask of compassion and morality.

Charities and foundations may sell themselves as some kind of viable solution in attempting to address the wrongs and failings of social hierarchies, but as those wrongs and failings are by design, these attempts are like most things within such groups, in being just a facade that is used to appease their obedient slaves’ delusions that these kinds of social structures give a damn about human life. These facades always have the same method of finding their claimed desired solutions in the form of collecting as much wealth or money as they can, but their method is more often than not, their real goal than any desire to find solutions to orchestrated wrongs or failings. We can make all the money we could ever need, but of course, any monopolised medium of exchange is purely used to control others, and any field our sockmakers have control over.

With fraud being a virtue within all social hierarchies, it is inevitable that our fraudsters will masquerade themselves as moral or even charitable in order to gain support for their lust for human exploitation. Hierarchies have always used charity or charities to defraud others, but this is not to say that all charities are used to deceive for financial gain alone, as many do have good intent, even if their methods are wasteful. With the dumbification of our populations that are conditioned to accept and even glorify frauds, we have many within these cultures wishing to be paid to go for a walk or a run, in order to promote a charity’s desire for wealth.

Our cultures of greed celebrate people participating in jumping from planes, climbing mountains, riding a bike, going for a swim, going on holiday or pursuing some other desired hobby or pursuit, as kind of heroes for participating in such futile contributions to solving a social issue or health condition. The idea that they could instead do their own research or, better still, form a social collaboration of research into any social issue or health condition, is seen as ridiculous by many mired in the money mindset, if seen at all. Having fun and enriching a few, while claiming to be having fun for the good of others, is a much easier thing to do than the effort required to understand any social issue or health problem and their remedies. And let’s face it, no hierarchy wants their populations looking too closely at the causes of their orchestrated social or health problems.

Large corporations wish to monopolise research and the narratives around it, making them very reluctant to encourage anyone to threaten their income streams. Any knowledge of a treatment or cure for a health condition that can’t be patented or licenced, will not be promoted by a health industry that is hungry for profits. While on the subject of charity fraud and ill health, we cannot finish this chapter without dipping our toe into the murky waters of the very lucrative cancer industry. The cancer industry alone generates huge profits from their charities by taking advantage of those desperately trying to avoid their own premature death or that of a loved one, and constantly plays with statistics and ignorances to justify their continuous streams of income.

Few seem to question the fact that cancer charities rake in vast amounts of wealth from the public, yet many cancer drugs are so overpriced to be out of the reach of many. These charities get the public to pay for their owner’s lifestyles and products by manipulating their social conscience and then overcharging them for using the products they helped to pay for. So the public are being fleeced in more ways than one. Thus, there is no great surprise that cancer drugs are by far the most profitable drugs for the drug industry. Convincing many to value this nonsense of asking or even expecting many to contribute to a private corporation’s profit margins, who will then reward such contributions with extortionately overpriced drugs, is only achievable with an ignorant population of belongers, but few social hierarchies are lacking in such things.

With the monopolisation of health care, our glorified wrongdoers need to declare all remedies that are out of their control as less-than in some way, or even dangerous, and this also applies to those who use or promote their use. Such terms as quackery, snake oil salesmen and the highly fashionable modern-day anti-vaxer are just some examples of the belittling that is necessary in elevating highly profitable drugs and demonising cheap or free remedies.

Our social hierarchal health industries are themselves full of unscientific quackery, yet this does not stop them from declaring all that nature can cure and heal as quackery, even when knowledge and scientific evidence have proven otherwise. Natural medicines used for thousands of years had to be rebranded as less-than compared to the patented products that were cheap to produce in factories and generated great profit margins, to ensure the monopolisation of “treatments” over cures.

Any doctor that takes advantage of nature’s medicine to aid our health can be easily struck off as a valued member of the glorified drug dealing class to ensure that most side with this pricey prescription pill-popping philosophy, if they wish to maintain their elevated worth. Doctors that side with the truth have even been arrested and jailed (and no doubt murdered) to ensure our glorified wrongdoers maintain total control over the industry.

When clear evidence emerged that petroleum-base medicines were causing cancers and killing people (as if any would be required when pumping people full of petroleum), did our glorified wrongdoers stop using them? Of course, not, the profits are too good. Instead, they created organizations and cancer charities to monopolise the cancer industry in order to profit from the cancers they cause and the “treatments” they sell, as well as ensuring they monopolise any research into cancer to ensure their contrived research is valued above any other. With many drugs derived from the oil industry, it’s no surprise when health industries that are owned by the same profit-hungry people share many of the same products and practices.

Speaking of quackery, chemotherapy is a range of poisons that have its roots in mustard gas, a very effective poison. These toxic poisons cause cancers, devastate the immune system and destroy our red blood cells and vital organs, to name a few of their effects. It is ironic that chemotherapy drugs cause the very conditions their salespeople claim to cure. Using chemotherapy to cure cancer is like setting fire to a house to kill a mouse. If the house is still standing, then success is declared for the fire, and if not, then its destruction was the fault of the mouse. Healthcare workers who work with these poisons risk their own health by significantly increasing their own chances of getting cancers and other health problems, as chemo drugs damage our DNA and cause mutations that can lead to cancers.

Secondary cancers (cancer that spreads around the body) are a known effect of chemotherapy and biopsies, so anyone getting such “treatments” will often get a different type or types of cancer as a result. Their torturers will often claim that the chemo cured their original cancer, while remaining silent or ignorant of the cause of cancers resulting from the chemo or biopsy. We have the lunacy of many people being killed by the “treatments” long before their cancer would kill them, if at all, as our bodies are capable of ridding themselves of cancers, but there is no profit in telling customers to go away. Nature’s cures for cancers (or anything for that matter) are rarely championed by those who profit from ill health, as our cultures of greed prefer the very easy and very cheap to produce chemical “treatments” that are incredibly profitable, and more importantly, controllable with patents.

In the same way that the natives of North America (and other groups) who knew the cure for scurvy were declared as crackpots by those who lorded more status upon themselves, while at the same time “treating” scurvy patients by making them drink seawater, our cultures have not moved on much when it comes to mixing knowledge with social status.

Now, of course, it makes sense to advise anyone who is ill of the best effective cure when we know what that cure is, but when we know little or pretend to know little about a health problem, then it can be a bit like Russian roulette. If cancer has no “official” known cure, it should make the demonization and vilification of natural cures or treatments, and those who use them, even more disturbing. But don’t expect those who gain elevated worth from the proliferation of ignorance to use such basic forms of logic.

If grown adults wish to seek a natural cure or treatment, then no corporation (especially those trying to profit from ill health) should interfere with their pursuit of such cures. Cancer cells can come and go, so it is no wonder that some will declare whatever they used to treat their cancer to be effective, but within the fog of uncertainty that shrouds anything we don’t fully understand, our glorified wrongdoers’ health industries can exploit many simply with social status. Bearing this in mind, let’s take a look at a couple of demonised “cures” or “treatments” that many who develop cancer use. Essiac tea (named after Rene Caisse) and apricot seeds are examples of a less harmful and more natural approach to addressing cancers.

Essiac tea is made with burdock root as the main plant, along with slippery elm, sheep sorrel and Indian rhubarb. There are many forms of this tea on the market, but few of them follow the proper method of preparation that alters its effectiveness. This opens the door for any corporations that wish to promote toxic chemicals over nature’s cures to do studies using these ineffective forms to gain the results they wish to promote. Apricot seeds have long been used to treat cancer by many cultures, and studies have found that a compound found in apricot kernels called amygdalin was effective in killing cancer cells.

Another study found that amygdalin could kill human pancreatic cancer cells without harming healthy cells, but as this is a very cheap and unpatentable (until all of nature is owned by a few) treatment or cure, it is obviously not going to be championed by an industry that is used to immense profits from selling cheap, monopolised, patented products at often obscene prices. Hence, according to our glorified wrongdoers, apricot seeds are magically transformed into deadly poisonous cyanide pills by those who own the very chemical corporations that literally make poisons to be put into human beings. Social hierarchies “approve” of these highly profitable chemical poisons that are proven to kill people, yet “disapprove” of seeds from a fruit that’s biggest danger is in chocking, just like many other foods.

Even the effectiveness of cheap, unpatented anti-parasitic drugs in eliminating cancer is routinely ignored in order to sell more profitable treatments. Fearmongering is always used to steer populations into serving the interests of the few, while real scientific investigation is hamstrung and overwhelmed with glorified liars within our cultures of greed that are more than happy for millions of people to suffer and die, just so a few can lavish in luxury.

It’s no great surprise that cancer rates have rocketed during the time period that our chemical industries have been producing toxic chemicals and dumping them into our environments, only to end up in our bodies. But nature always has its cures. Cancer cells can be destroyed by sound or resonance frequency therapy, as many prefer to call it. Turmeric can starve cancer cells, but as turmeric is a food that is heavily faked, it can be difficult for some of us to get our hands on real turmeric.

Few who have cancer have the time to study every possible cure to save their lives, as most are mired in the pursuit of chasing another man’s socks. So most are swayed by an industry of greed, as well as the social and family pressures of siding with those of status. Most just want their loved ones to survive and will put blind faith in our hierarchal health industries despite their current and historical atrocities. This is only possible when we are ignorant of the realities of such systems, but it takes little observation to understand those realities, should we choose to see them. Whatever cure or treatment we wish to dabble in, we are more than capable of finding the most effective ways to ensure our good health, as long as we are not hamstrung with feeding the greed of a few.

The Death of Real Food

Within the chemical age, it is hard to avoid the toxins contained within our chemicals, and with many of the carcinogenic chemicals that are all around us, it is perhaps no wonder that as much as half of our populations get cancer in many parts of the world. We not only have these chemicals in our foods and drinks, but also in our everyday products that we fill our homes with, not to mention the risks from our technologies. Nitrates and nitrites in our foods are an example of our unnecessary overuse of chemicals. They are, of course, found naturally in foods, but by putting our synthetic forms directly into our foods unnecessarily, we increase our risk of overconsumption. These chemicals are antimicrobial, and as we are all microbial, an excess of this stuff is not great for our health.

If exposed to extreme heat or a highly acidic environment, sodium nitrate, like sodium nitrite, can change into nitrosamine within the body. Nitrosamine is a known carcinogen. Sodium nitrite in our pesticides is used by many as a preferred method of suicide due to its toxicity. Sodium nitrate is used to preserve and colour processed meats, but it is also used in fertilizer, glass, and explosives, so, in effect, eating these highly processed meats is, for many (metaphorically speaking), like eating poo, filled with glass that will explode within us to damage our health. This is not to suggest that meat is bad for us, but to acknowledge that our treatment of the animals we eat and how we process the meat we get from them is not always with the health of the consumer in mind, and more to do with what is most profitable for those with a controlling interest within such industries.

Despite what our masters tell their slaves to encourage them to eat low-nutrient foods, as they hoard the most nutritious foods for themselves, eating meat is not bad for us. The fact that this needs to be said says much about our cultures’ decline in basic knowledge. It is, in fact, one of the most nutrient-dense foods we can eat, especially the organ meat. The push to sell the highly nutritious resource of animals as a bad thing may have more to do with serving the interests of those who own the patents on synthetic meat.

When it comes to anything that is being sold as a cure to save the planet from those who actively engage in its ruin, it’s safe to assume that their own status and wealth are what is attempting to be saved, not any planet. There is always going to be a distinct lack of compassion and respect for our environments and the animals we eat, when profits mean more than life itself. All life is connected, and this basic understanding alone can be enough to gain respect for the life forms we share our time and space with, but as ignorance is part of the bedrock of our social hierarchies, understanding is always going to be a casualty of greed.

What we do to the animals we eat can obviously directly affect us. When we inject animals with a cocktail of chemicals, antibiotics and hormones, as well as making them consume feed that is unnatural to them, and loaded with plastics and other hazards, we cannot be too surprised if we affect our own health when we eat such animals. From a hierarchal farmer’s perspective, creating larger, more profitable livestock within a shorter time period is obviously going to be preferred over smaller, more naturally reared animals, as their income is connected to the weight of their animals.

In today’s monopolised world, those who control market prices can squeeze farmers to the brink, where they are barely breaking even or even making a loss. We could argue that within our cultures of greed, where we put vastly more value on wrongdoers and their entertainers than we do on those who help keep us alive, too many of us are conditioned to not care enough about what we consume. Many know more about some celebrity’s latest nonsense than they do about what they are putting into their own bodies. However, when most are mere slaves to the greed of a few, the glorified few care little about the nutritional worth of what their slaves eat, or even if they eat at all.

The disdain our glorified wrongdoers have for those who work to produce our foods has always been evident, but this practice has taken a dark turn in the last few decades, as those who hide behind fictions have been stealing the farmland from others all around the world. Land grabs are nothing new among social hierarchies and will always continue as long as they exist. Controlling food is just another stage in oppressing people so they become dependent on their masters for survival. When people lose the ability to grow their own food (as most already have), they are more willing to obey those who control the food they need, as we all need to eat.

With their weapon of choice being paper and ink, our glorified wrongdoers are doing what they always do in trying to monopolise everything, including farming and the food supply. In a bid to syphon the world’s food stocks into the hands of a few, the monopolisation of food prices along with government policies, corrupt state officials (more commonly known as “state officials”) and endless frauds that masquerade as legislation, all help to hand independent farms into the hands of corporations owned by a few.

Another underhanded tactic our glorified wrongdoers commonly use to steal farmland, as mentioned earlier, is with genetically modified organisms (GMO’s) or more commonly known as GM foods. Our glorified wrongdoers are now even selling their land grabs to put the world’s food supply into the hands of a few, as “saving the planet”, although the only thing they wish to save it from is access to food for the masses, outwith their control. Methane from cows has become part of their doomsday philosophies, and only those ignorant of methane and its contributors can join this cult. So, cow culling is seen as a wonderful idea to save the planet, within such minds.

Even trees release methane, so by the same logic, should we also demonise and cull trees? With the lunacy of glorified liars and idiots championing the idea that cow farts will kill us all, unless we steal our farmer’s livestock and farms from them to be totally monopolised by a few, means populations will see their food prices become heavily dependent on their obedience to that few. Stealing farms is happening all over the world, but of course, when we own the justice systems, we don’t have to call it stealing.

GMOs are sold as something wonderful by those who own the patents on them, but their real use is to generate great wealth by controlling the world’s food. No corporation can patent nature (supposedly), but by altering nature genetically, our glorified wrongdoers have found a way to get around the crazy notion that nature belongs to all or no one, and now belongs to just a few.

As always, when our glorified wrongdoers are up to no good in their pursuit of wealth and status, there are always those who voice inconvenient truths that show them to be the liars that they are. In the case of GMO foods, Arpad Pusztai is just one of those voices, as he showed the level of harm caused to rats that ate these foods. Stunted growth, repressed immune systems, and thickening gut mucosa certainly did not aid the health of rats, but perhaps our glorified wrongdoers thought it would benefit their slave classes.

Arpad faced the fate of many who voice truths publicly that threaten the wealth of a few, so the lying industries turned their cogs of malice to discredit someone who was regarded as an expert in his field and served that field with distinction for decades. If decades of valued work can be wiped out by one unwelcome finding, no wonder many who are devoid of integrity avoid the truth.

The disgraceful treatment of people who are held in high esteem within their field one day, then demonised the next for sharing a truth that interferes with our social hierarchies’ wealth and control, is a common practice within our cultures of greed. This practice always helps to keep many within their scientific communities silent if they discover something they know could threaten their career, as for many, even within the fields of science, it is better to be wealthy and wrong than poor and right.

Anyway, back to farming. Farming can be a lonely business when there is no one around for miles. Many can feel isolated and alone, especially when under attack from glorified wrongdoers. Financial pressures, livestock disease, poor harvest, government policies and legislation can all devastate farmers at the best of times, but when being actively hounded by our corporate overlords to surrender everything they own, the psychological pressures of such a nightmare can take their toll. As a result of losing everything, farmers have been committing suicide at an alarming rate all around the world. Many suicides are not classed as suicides due to varying factors.

Farmers have killed themselves by jumping in front of harvesters and into machinery, so without witnesses, many suicides will be classed as accidents. Of course, there is the fact that many do not get a life insurance payment to their families if they are deemed to have committed suicide, so accidents are more palatable for all. Not to mention our corporate master’s medias are not too keen on bringing attention to the fallout of their mass theft of farmland. These factors, among others, play a role in the underestimation of suicides within the farming industry.

Many hierarchal cultures have paid the price of murdering their food producers on mass, as is their habit. Farming and fishing are among our most dangerous industries to work in, with hundreds of thousands of deaths happening every year. Farm and fish workers have always been labelled as low-status by social hierarchies, as these industries require honest hard work that can be dangerous. Whereas status seekers much prefer lying, talking or giving orders in lavish surroundings. Deceitful high-reward-low-effort work, is more revered than honest low-reward-high-effort work in such cultures.

These two industries are not just occupied by debt slaves but also riddled with traditional slaves, who are always viewed as disposable by all social hierarchies. Perhaps if bankers, lawyers or politicians where dying in the same numbers when doing their jobs, there would be endless coverage and financial support to deal with the issues. But devalued and dehumanised people dying in their droves is rarely even noteworthy within cultures that worship those who have more stuff than others.

The food industry (like every other industry) has an army of slaves that do all the hard work, while the master classes lavish in the profits of their labour, but as slaves never get the credit they deserve, few in such cults give a second thought to the less-thans who provide us with the food we eat. Although for a little balance and not to glorify or demonise those who help to put food in our bellies, we must also recognise the many historical wrongs committed by farm owners who were often overly obedient slaves, even if they are pushed into doing so by their hierarchy.

Whenever groups of people settle into a farming culture under a social hierarchy’s expansion into new territories, they often declare the occupying inhabitants of farmers, non-farmers or hunter-gatherers as less than (as they do with everything), in order to justify murdering as many people as possible to rid them from the territories they wish to monopolise for themselves. High-status farmers, like all who value differing worth, succumb to the acts of wrongdoing all too willingly, as they put their desires above the lives of others. It’s the curse of social greed.

We could argue that agriculture led to the gross inequality that most of us are all too familiar with, as it allowed a percentage of us to contribute little to our personal and group’s needs, freeing some of us up to spend our time conspiring with our fellow shirkers to cultivate our groups into being less inclusive, in a bid to elevate our worth at the cost of others in our group. In many ways, farming is the equivalent of injecting our status seekers with steroids, allowing them to multiply their wrongdoings many times over. As farmers are now encouraged to not only poison the land but also the rivers and oceans (as much of our poisonous chemicals from farming and many other industries end up there), it is difficult for many to escape the consumption of these chemicals.

Fish has always been a great source of nutrition in our diets, but due to the pollution of their environments, fish are now increasingly becoming something we should avoid for the sake of our health. With those who hide behind the fictions of corporations using the rivers and oceans as their toilet to dump their waste (which is substantial within our cultures of mass waste), we are making life very difficult for most that live there. Not content with dumping our chemicals and plastics in the nearest bit of water, we engage in the practice of trawling our ocean floors and river beds to cause the desertification of our river and ocean floors.

With estimates of over half the biomass in the oceans being lost since industrial fishing took off, we are decimating not only a great food resource but also aiding in the extinction of many species. The loss of freshwater fish has even higher estimates of decline, having many of the same issues as saltwater fish with the added problem of our inefficient dams interfering with the spawning and feeding grounds they migrate to and from.

Our gross mismanagement of our planet’s largest environment is very predictable when greed is so glorified to the point where we need to plunder as much as we can, and as fast as we can, in order to attain the superficial status such cultures value. We are not the first animal to grossly deplete or even destroy an essential resource, and we are unlikely to be the last, but we may be one of the few who understand what we are doing to some degree, yet do it anyway.

As a result of having less and less wild fish to catch, we are now more and more reliant on farmed fish. Wild fish have become toxic enough over the years, but still struggles to compete with the toxicity of farmed fish. As of 2013, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, we began consuming more farmed fish than we did wild fish. This maybe great news for corporations who can secure their “inventory” in one place without having to go out chasing it down, but it is not so great for those eating farmed fish. With all the problems we would expect from drastically interfering with the lives of animals that can roam for thousands of miles during their lives, to being confined to a very cramped cage, we are following our land-grown foods example of producing less nutritious and even harmful foods.

A lifetime imprisoned within a small area that is heavily overcrowded, leads to fish swimming in all of their waste matter, which in turn leads to lice and other parasites being common, as well as the toxic chemicals they are marinated in, which are often used in an attempt to combat the problems that come with such artificial conditions. Medicated with vaccines and antibiotics, doused in pesticides and disinfections, high copper levels, fungus that eats away at the fish and fed on toxic pellets, not to mention the cruelty involved in subjecting animals to such a fate, all make fish farming bad for the fish, the environment and ourselves. Even the lunacy of feeding wild fish to farmed fish, so we can eat farmed fish instead of just eating the wild fish, seems to be lost on many.

As we would expect for our habitual monopolisers, it is not just our farmlands that are being funnelled into the hands of a few, but also our rivers and oceans, in order to aid gross inequality, with fishing rights being handed out to a small number of families and groups. GMO fish is already out there, and perhaps once we have killed off all the natural fish, every fish on the planet will be owned by one corporation that owns their never-ending patents on them.

Policy enforcers may one day be handing out fines for anyone eating fish without a licence, never mind catching fish. Once all farmland and fish stocks are owned by one corporation, perhaps our future generations will have to pander to those who own all the world’s food produce in order to be deemed worthy of life. We know using food to control their slaves is nothing new for social hierarchies, this possible future nightmare is just on a grander scale.

When Food Mimics Fraudsters

In many parts of the world, our glorified wrongdoers think nothing of imprisoning people who use plants that have never killed anyone, while ignoring and even aiding people who adulterate foods that lead to the illness and even death of many. Many of the foods we once ate to aid our health now come with fake or lesser version. Not exactly a huge shock within our fake cultures that are fed on a diet of lies. For example, in many places sales of honey are 5 times that of its production, so only 20% of honey is real honey. Meaning 80% of honeyeaters in some parts of the world are eating fake honey. Instead of eating nutritious honey, many of us are eating cheap sweeteners that harm our health. Things like high-fructose corn syrup (a real delicacy) and other syrups, as well as other unsuspecting ingredients within our fake honey, are now more common than honey.

Honey has no doubt been used for millions of years by humans, and even before humans were human. Its uses are vast when it comes to its healing powers. Despite their better efforts, our malicious monopolisers have failed to engineer patentable microbes that are resistant to honey, no doubt in an attempt to render all honey less effective as a healing product in order to produce their own special patented honey, which most would need a small mortgage to acquire.

Thankfully, for now, we still have honey in the world, despite huge efforts by our greedy status seekers who have also failed to produce an artificial honey that can be as effective as the real thing. If we ever create an artificial honey, it would be patented, and as real honey would be its competition, then we would no doubt see honey become very rare or very expensive to be kept out of reach of the slave classes, if not disappear altogether once we kill every bee or its healing abilities have been rebranded as quackery and dangerous to human health.

Honey is one of nature’s products that is great for healing infections, suppressing inflammation, cleaning wounds and stimulating the growth of repair cells. Spinach, among other foods found in most supermarkets, can do the same. Honey is a great anti-biotic because it is very heavily saturated with natural sugars, and sugar, like salt, is great at drawing out moisture, so it basically works by sucking up the moisture of anything that it comes into contact with, like bacteria. Honey works on this mechanical level, so it causes no harm, unlike many of the man-made products like synthesised antibiotics that work on a chemical level. Honey has always been valued for its wondrous powers, but our historical practices for collecting bees’ vomit often led to a lot of dead bees and destroyed beehives. That is, until Petro Prokopovych came along and developed the beekeeping practices many use today.

With our newfound practices that did not require lethal force, we not only improved our ability to exploit bees for their honey, we also improved in using them to pollinate our crops to give us more control over our food production. Mr Prokopovych may not be regarded as great or as glorious as our glorified wrongdoers, but it is fair to say he played a role in our excess food production that led to the global population boom after his death in 1850, so we could argue that many of us owe our existence to his work. However, in our cultures that celebrate murdering people more than they do helping people, there is not a lot of room for appreciating the type of work people like Mr Prokopovych engaged in.

Just for fun, let’s go through a few of the fake foods we eat to feed the greed of a few, and how we may risk our health in doing so. Fake olive oil, like honey, helps sales to outstrip production with the help of highly industrialised seed oils that masquerade as olive oil. Fake or synthesised truffle oil that has come nowhere near a truffle makes up the majority on the market, as it’s produced by adding a chemical called 2,4-dithiapentane to an oil, which mimics the taste and aroma of truffles. Fake tea is filled with sawdust and leaves from other plants. Fake coffee with twigs, chicory, cereals, caramel, parchment, starch and figs, to name a few adulterants used to bulk up profits.

Fake herbs and spices with the added threat from microbes, fungi, mycotoxins, pesticides and toxic heavy metals. Saffron and vanilla are two of the most common spices to adulterate, with an array of flowers and dyed plants being used as fake saffron, while fake vanilla extract is made in a lab. It is called vanillin and added to sugars, and often sold to give the impression of the real thing, and we won’t even go into how castoreum from a beaver’s bum gland found its way into our diets. Fake fish that may pose an extra threat to pregnant women and children, when more toxic, cheaper fish are passed off as something it is not. Fake meats that are sold as different meats, not to mention patented lab-meat. Fake wasabi that is dyed green horseradish…we could go on, but let’s leave it there before this book turns into War and Peace.

When it comes to what we eat, whether we are obsessing over every ingredient or taking the “ignorance is bliss” approach, we can expect our foods to always come with a risk of adulteration as long as we are reducing a human’s worth to how many socks they have. Although social hierarchies will often sell adulterating practices as exclusive to low-status criminals, those who know that criminals are exactly what social hierarchies are made up of, know better.

Take the alcohol industry, for example. Fake alcohol is passing one product off as another, but “illegal“ alcohol is pretty much defined as any alcohol that a social hierarchy is not taking a cut of the profits from, even if it is the best product in the world. One of the practices our self-righteous more-thans with their pseudo-morality have engaged in was making and selling deadly, poisonous alcohol that harms and kills.

By pretending that their deadly produce is a product of those they wish to brand as criminals, in order to scare their targeted populations into either avoiding all alcohol on some kind of moral objection, or only buying from their approved (tax-paying or owned) corporations, our glorified wrongdoers’ deadly deeds helped them secure their monopolies on the alcohol market. The fact that they harmed and killed many people while hidden behind their pseudo-morality to achieve this market dominance with their own toxic products is obviously not much of a concern to our glorified wrongdoers. Killing people, passing blame, then pretending to save the day, is a well-worn practice our glorified wrongdoers like to champion. Make the problem, offer the solution and reap the rewards of the pre-planned solution is a pattern for all to see.

Refined foods may be a term that so-called “high end” restaurants use to try and sell their produce as something of high value, but the removal of nutrients from the foods we eat is not something that is valued by all. Heavily refined foods are not what our bodies are designed to consume, and this denutritionalising of our foods does not aid our health in any way. Consumption of whole foods is associated with improved health and reduced risk of many chronic diseases, while refined foods are linked to the opposite.

The basic staple of bread has become a common victim of the refineries. We have been eating bread for at least thousands of years, but we have only been eating highly refined flours in our breads for over a hundred years, by using the process of removing the bran and germ, simply to give flour a longer shelf life to increase the wealth of a few. A long shelf life in foods is exactly what the processed food industry values, as it lessens spoilage and increases profits. The fact that it produces a nutritionally inferior product matters little when profits soar, but the processed food industry is hardly at the cutting edge of producing nutritious foods.

Whole grains have complex carbohydrates that our bodies break down slowly to control the release of the energy stored within them, but with only the grains’ endosperm left after the wheat germ and bran are taken out, we are left with a refined flour that is made up of simple carbohydrates that our bodies break down quickly. This raises blood sugar and insulin to deal with this fast absorption, which can cause metabolic dysfunction. As if depleting the nutrients in the refining process that results in a substantial loss of dietary fibre, B vitamins, iron, magnesium, and vitamin E was not bad enough, refined flour goes that extra mile to hinder our health as it contains harmful additives like potassium bromate, chlorine gas and benzoyl peroxide, to name a few. When we have regressed to the point where we can’t even get bread right, it is no wonder nutritional deficiencies are so common.

While on the subject of low-nutritious and harmful refined foods, we can’t ignore refined sugars. We have reached the stage where we have it in up to 80% of the foods on offer in many parts of the world, so good luck trying to avoid the stuff. The over-reliance of refined sugar in the processed food industry means many of us are eating far too much, and too much sugar in our diet is linked to many health problems like obesity, chronic diseases like cancers, diabetes, fatty liver disease, heart disease, high blood pressure and metabolic dysfunction, to name but a few.

Refined sugar is among the most inflammatory substances we eat, so it is no great surprise that our level of sugar consumption aligns with our level of inflammatory diseases. Within populations that have succumbed to the processed food industry’s domination, we see an increase in such health conditions.

Refined sugars are a food type product that provides us with next to no nutritional value, so it is a food that our bodies don’t need, although it may be a different story for our addicted brains. Sugar is a very cheap product that can make poor quality, nutritionally barren and tasteless “foods” taste almost palatable, so we can understand why the processed food industry needs it so badly. It also has the long shelf life that our profit-driven food industries love.

We could argue that processed foods are merely pseudo-foods, as they barely fall into the category of a nourishing substance. The sugar industry uses the same tactics as other industries of buying studies with highly qualified “experts” who will sell the “findings” they wish to find, and ignore any unprofitable truths that may affect their income. As the demonization of fats was championed by all of the lying industries, who no doubt got their cut of the profits, this led to flavoursome and nutritious fats being removed from many foods, in favour of more harmful and cheaper substances. Sugar became the cure-all for the bland, cheap food stuff that lacked any flavour or taste, due in part, to the absence of natural and nutritious fats. Hence, the abundance of foods saturated with sugar.

The Fat Wars

The idea that fat makes us fat may sound plausible to many, but having survived millions of years of eating fats, it is remarkable that many believed the new industrialised products of refined sugars and oils, over natural fats, would somehow result in an improvement in our health. Viewing natural fats as a bad thing is only a relatively recent phenomenon in the last few generations of human beings, who have been exposed to the demonization of fats by their corporate masters. It is a lot harder to become fat when eating natural foods than it is when eating the low-nutritious factory foods, which are pushed upon the slave classes.

Before mass propaganda sold slave food as healthy, humans always valued fat as a vital nutrient, not to mention the fact that we love its flavour and taste. Being fat or obese, or whatever happens to be the fashionable word for having more flesh than we need, used to be a rarity that was even celebrated as an achievement when eating natural foods. However, in today’s highly refined and low-nutritional food world, overweight and obese people have become normal in populations who endure “health experts” who claim that natural fat is unhealthy, and two of the most harmful substances we consume in refined oils and sugars are healthy.

With the very high levels of ill health within populations that consume lots of refined grains, sugars and oils, many are encouraged to ignore the obvious connections to these substances, while blaming a natural food source that we have been consuming for millions of years on the sudden change in human health. Ignoring the fact that the financial gains of our food and health industries are at the root of the lies around diet and nutrition will never help to address the problems. With poverty being an essential part of all social hierarchies, it is the slave classes that are subjected the most to these low-nutrition, fat-free, heavily-processed weight-gaining “foods”. The common practice of victim blaming less-thans by more-thans who hide behind their wealth, status and fictions, leads to the overweight less-thans being demonised as gluttons, while ignoring what more-thans have done to the foods we eat.

Many health industries push a high-carb diet as the healthiest kind of diet, yet we can maintain our health with little to no carbohydrates, but would struggle to exist without proteins and fats, as they are essential nutrients for our survival. Both carbs and fats are sources of energy, but fats are by far a more stable and efficient source, metabolically speaking. The peaks and troughs of our metabolic reactions to highly refined carbohydrates can have harmful effects on our health, whereas natural fats have a much less extreme reaction, as they provide a steady release of energy. The high-carb diet has ushered in the obesity age, where being overweight is almost expected, and this has normalized “dieting”, with avoiding natural fats and calorie counting being sold as the counter to obesity, but just compounds the problem.

Many of these dieting philosophies are based on limiting the consumption of calories, instead of examining the types of foods we are eating. Changing from a processed-food diet to a natural-food diet would aid most in losing weight. Many of us study and even obsess over the calories and fat content in the foods we eat, instead of the nutritional content or the metabolic reactions our foods cause. Insulin is our body’s major fat storage hormone, and our bodies require insulin to process carbs, but not to process fats. So, if we avoid fats that do not activate our major fat storage hormone, while consuming mostly carbs that do, it is not the wisest thing to do if losing weight and avoiding fat storage is our goal.

Understanding the effect foods have on our hormones and the effect those hormones have on us is not something the processed food industry or diet industry cares to promote, but for anyone wishing to lose weight, counting calories is nowhere near the full story. A high-carb diet can lead to an imbalance of hormones that can contribute to weight gain.

Leptin is a hormone that is made by our fat cells that tells our brains we are full so that we stop eating. But with the over-production of the hormone insulin, leptin is blocked from getting the message to our brains, which makes us want to keep eating. Any food producer would increase their profits by lacing their foods with leptin blockers. Once we have unbalanced our hormone levels with a continued excess of insulin, we are arguably in a state of ill health. A state that disrupts our metabolic functions, which can lead to weight gain, as well as other health problems.

The high-carb diet is sold as something of worth because it is the cheapest and main source of profit for the processed food industry. If animal fats were as cheap and plentiful as processed plants are, and plants as expensive as animal fats are, then no doubt our food industries would use fats in their foods to increase their profits, and sell a high-fat diet as something to value. Though the shorter shelf life of fat may be a problem for the food industry. We could argue that there has never been a human population that has had such a high-carb diet as the last few generations, who have been fed on a diet that is so much lower in fat and protein than our ancestors. We could argue that, despite advances in sanitation and health care (to a degree), we are most likely among the unhealthiest generations of humans to walk this planet.

Many parts of the world have lost their food markets, which were filled with the smells and aromas of all different types of fresh foods that came from nature, and replaced them with these very sterile supermarkets that sell very sterile foods that come from factories where much of the nutrients have been destroyed. As a lot of manufactured foods have the fat and therefore flavour removed, trans-fats and commercial fructose are added in order to try and make these foods palatable, and aid in the browning of some foods.

Fructose does not suppress the hunger hormone ghrelin, so when we eat foods that fool us into thinking we are hungry, we can consume many calories without feeling full. Removing the fibre from foods to give them a longer shelf life also does little for the health of those who consume these foods, but these are just a few of the many things that we do to our foods that aids our ill health.

Another reason our profit hungry corporations sold the lie that animal fats were bad was so that they could increase the sales of their refined seed, vegetable and grain oils. The chemicals and heat that are used to make these oils causes oxidization in the oils that produces free radicals, so using such oils can laden the foods cooked in them with toxic aldehydes that are known to cause gene mutations to alter RNA and DNA, and cause inflammation.

Many foods cooked in the catering industry, where these oils can be heated all day and used for several days and even weeks at a time, are among our main sources of these aldehydes. More aldehydes with your fries, anyone? We could argue that these oils should be used in machines and not in our bodies, and in fact, cottonseed oil, as the first refined oil, was a waste product of the cotton industry. This oil was dumped into rivers, among other places, and it was known to be toxic to life, in no small part due to the pesticide gossypol that is present in cotton plants and its seeds. But our lovers of exploitation do love to take waste products and rebrand them to their slave classes as something of worth, to their own bank accounts at least.

During the frenzy of the industrial exploitation revolution in the mid-1800s, apparently, a soap maker and a candle maker got together (as they both used fats for their products) to rebrand the sludge of cottonseed oil as an alternative to the more expensive animal fats. With the birth of oil refineries underway, refining this toxic oil and selling it as “safe to consume” led to the hydrogenated cooking oil we are way too familiar with today. The rise of these oils and the rise of cardiovascular disease have similar trajectories, but best not look at that when licking these oils off our fingers.

These oils are now in so many of the foods we eat that it can be difficult for many to avoid them. Even our newest humans are fed these things, as they are even found in baby formulas. Vilifying butter, that has been long used and highly valued, and glorifying the health hazard that is seed oils, has been the strategy of those selling these oils in order to present these poisons as something healthier than a natural product. Such lies have ensured even bigger profits for a food industry that cares little for their customer’s health.

Health industries benefited too with the increase in ill health and deaths that come to many who regularly consume these oils and spreads. Fully hydrogenated oils are incredibly hard, but partially hydrogenated oils are more similar to the consistency of butter and are used as a cheap replacement, with the added feature of producing trans-fatty acids that do us no favours. We can make the case that fat is a superfood (if we value such a concept), as fats perform so many functions in the body, not to mention that our brains are mostly fat in dry weight. There are fats that are bad for us and fats that are good for us, and in the whole, the ones that cause us the most harm are the industrial-made ones that have only been around for the last few generations, while the ones that aid our health have been used for a very long time.

We have been eating saturated fats for so long without heart disease being our top killer, but still, many of us believe the lies of those that wish to sell us their harmful products. The rise of heart disease, matching the mass consumption of “refined” oils that were previously factory waste products or used in machinery, is hardly just a coincidence. To go from a relatively uncommon form of death to the most common form within such a relatively short period of time is no small achievement. Good old capitalism, eh! These easily oxidised fats are certainly not something we want too much of if we desire longevity, as cells that are mostly comprised of oils that are easy to oxidise do not live as long as cells with fats that are hard to oxidise.

These oils can oxidise long before we even use them and even after we have consumed them, as they can oxidise within our bodies to produce some of those lovely aldehydes that have become a dietary staple for many. Despite the advertised claims of the sales departments of those who make these highly processed oils and fats, many studies have proven that eating these “food stuff” ensures a speedier death than eating the saturated fats that the same salespeople have been trying to convince so many of their customers to avoid, ironically, for health reasons. When in truth, the only reason to market these and many other unnatural foods as healthy, while lying about the health risks of vastly more nutritious natural foods, is to enrich a few. Most foods that are made in factories and sell themselves as health foods are more often than not the total opposite of a healthy food, if we can even call them food.

Milk is another great source of nutrients we have been using for a very long time that has become a target of those wishing to maximise the income of a few, at the cost of many people’s health. Milk is one of nature’s most nutritious foods which all mammals benefit from, but even milk and its dairy products have been demonised by the “fat is bad” propagandists. Removing many of the nutrients from milk and calling it skimmed milk to adhere to the “fat is bad” lie is yet another hindrance to the health of those who consume such products.

Skimmed milk, as the by-product of the butter making process, was often discarded, used to make other products (like white wash) or was fed to animals. However, once many were convinced that natural fat is bad, this product was marketed to humans who believed this lie. One such consequence to our health of consuming fatless milk over normal milk can be a deficiency in vitamin A, as vitamin A is a fat soluble vitamin and found within fats, so by removing the fat from milk we remove most of the vitamin A. Vitamin A is also required to digest milk, so when digesting skimmed milk, we must use the vitamin A stored in our bodies, as there is none in the milk to aid our digestion, and if we consume this often, we could become deficient in this vitamin.

It does not end there, as proteins lost in this process are often replaced by adding powdered milk that has been heated to oxidize the cholesterol within it. Not exactly something we want too much of inside us. With the demonization of fat having led to many foods being laden with sugars, products like low-fat, high-sugar milk drinks and yoghurts are sold as healthier than normal milk and yoghurts, according to the “fat is bad” brigade. Even though most know profit margins are the driving force of such products, not the health of those who consume them, many still believe their lies, no matter how often they are exposed.

Milk is a great food source, but again, in today’s world, we should probably change that to “organic milk” is a great food source, as many dairy cows are laden with a cocktail of hormones and drugs to increase profit margins. There are few foods as rich in nutrition as milk, and many cultures have known this to help produce healthier populations, but due to the nature of our cultures of greed, finding foods that have not been altered in some way to feed the greed of the few can prove to be a challenge.

The nonsense around the glorification of simple carbs and the demonization of natural fats can be seen in the Inuit or Eskimo people, who have been eating large quantities of animal fats for thousands of years. In recent times, many Inuit have adopted parts of the westernized diet, to the detriment of their health. Heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure were once as rare as a game of beach volleyball to the Inuit, but due to the influx of the low-nutrition, high-sugar, high-carbohydrate and chemically saturated foods that are now sold to them, their health is now as poor as that of other populations around the world that consume these foods in large quantities.

In the same way that we can develop our characteristics based on our sequence of experiences within our environments, the sequence of how we eat our food can cause different reactions within our bodies. Just by eating our food in the order of vegetables, proteins and then carbohydrates, we can drastically reduce the glucose spike that carbs cause. If we think of our carbs as our status seekers (who like carbs are totally unnecessary for a healthy environment) that go around causing destruction and mayhem in environments where they have free reign, like that of a glucose spike. And when introducing a limited number of status seekers into our environments at any one time, by having the less malevolent among us in the form of our vegetables and proteins being first to establish themselves within our environments, then we reduce the level of harm that comes with an invasion of the malicious, when restricted by the more benevolent.

Damn, anyone else thinking this book is starting to affect their metaphors? Anyway, basically the veg and proteins slow the rate at which the glucose molecules of our carbs are absorbed within our bloodstream to limit the spikes they can cause. Probably should have just stuck with that!

We live in cultures that glorify hierarchies and their minions who contribute little to society, when compared to farmers and many others. As food is just another resource social hierarchies monopolise and control to serve their own interests, it gets disrespected like everything else that must bow to the glory of the few. Destroying food on a mass scale to manipulate market prices, so our serial monopolists can squeeze more profits from those reliant on the markets they control, is the norm in our modern era, but food control and destruction are practice regularly used by our hierarchies throughout history.

As a modern example, in 1992, the MacSharry reforms were used to limit and control food output in order to stabilize the profits of corporations, as this is more important than having enough affordable food for all. This is just one example of how our food cartels feed their own greed to the detriment of many populations. Having an abundance of food to feed all is a problem only for cultures of differing worth, as they rely on harming people to maintain social status. Thus, undernourished, starving and hungry people will always be created to feed the depravity of our hierarchies.

Tasty Toxins

If navigating our way through the endless icebergs of ill-health and death that lurk within our foods was not bad enough, getting a drink can prove just as challenging for our health. From plain old water to the chemical catastrophes that some call energy drinks, risks to our health, whether they are known, unknown, suspected or denied, are always going to exist when our wealth trumps our health. Currently (2022), we have around 75% of the world’s population that has access to “safely managed drinking water” (definitions can vary), leaving 25% of us drinking water that is arguably at greater risk of being contaminated by our corporate wrongdoers, who have a habit of dumping their toxic waste all over our environments.

With 2 billion people lacking access to “safely managed drinking water” and 3.6 billion people lacking access to “safely managed sanitation”, there is a real need to resolve the basic needs we all share. Although when the needs of all are reliant on the will of a few who gain so much from creating the needy, let’s not hold our breaths for resolutions.

Over a million people (less-thans, of course) die each year due to drinking from an “unsafe water source” (definitions can vary), but we should also consider how many die from drinking “safely managed drinking water”. The fluoride many of us consume from the water we drink are chemicals by-product of industries. These man-made fluorides or inorganic compounds are much more toxic than natural fluoride. With aluminium fluoride and sodium fluoride from the aluminium industry ending up in our drinking water, it can all be enough to drive us to crack open a bottle of three penis wine. A true Chinese delicacy.

The fluoride industry and the nuclear industry are not only link by the practice of dumping toxic waste into our communities and environments, but also in creating products we put inside our bodies. Too much exposure to fluoride is linked with many health conditions, and with our body’s inability to remove it all from our system, we end up absorbing it into our bones and brains with an accumulative effect over time. Some suggest this is done knowingly to calcify the pineal gland, for very specific reasons. We would need another chapter or book to go into this biological wonder alone, but let’s avoid having to hire a forklift truck just to move this book from A to B and move on.

Most of us are now drinking water that contains a chemical disinfection to combat infectious and deadly pathogens, but this is only a practice that has been widely used for just over a century. All chemical disinfection methods are associated with by-products. Some of the known effects these disinfection by-products (DBPs) have on our health have been linked to fertility and developmental problems, as well as cancers.

DBPs in drinking water are neurotoxic, cytotoxic, mutagenic, genotoxic and carcinogenic. This knowledge may inspire thoughts of a few trips to the nearest natural spring to avoid these DBP’s, but as we expose ourselves to DBPs when we wash in chemically disinfected water by absorption through our skin and inhalation of the water vapour, they can be difficult to avoid.

Even if we decided to only wash in the rain, there is still no escape, as DBPs are also in the air, not to mention in many of the drinks and foods we consume. Now our chemists may make the argument that the level of ill health and deaths from water containing chemical disinfectants, is lower than that of untreated water, therefore it is arguably an improvement of sorts (as defined by the standard of doing nothing to purify drinking water), but we know that there are safer ways to purify our water without using harmful chemicals that have been used in the past.

Copper has been used for thousands of years for its antimicrobial properties, and was widely used in storing and transporting water until our oil monopolists recently started to sell their cheap plastics as an alternative. Ionization or ultraviolet rays help to avoid toxic chemicals in our water, while ancient filtration technologies using zeolite and quartz minerals, plants, pyramids or solar disinfection using the sun are just a few examples of healthier ways to purify our water. However, if there is no monopolisation of alternatives that can be sold for a small fortune, as there is with chemicals, our greed cults will no doubt demonise any alternative to their income streams.

Bearing in mind the health risks our water poses to us, let’s up the ante of risk to our health with less natural drinks that many would only use as a cleaning product, rather than put in their body, as sugar saturated, carbonated, acidic sodas drinks are not exactly associated with good health. Soda drinks are linked to obesity, diabetes, tooth decay, weakening of bones, heart disease, cancers, dementia and Parkinson’s, along with digestive and circulatory diseases, to name but a few of the treats in store for those who consume these products regularly. What many generously call “energy drinks” make soda look like a healthy option. Coal tar, the by-product of processed coal (more waste products,) is used to produce the artificial sweetener saccharine and food colourings that are used in many foods and drinks, as well as the synthetic caffeine that can be found in energy drinks.

So, one lump of coal or two with your drink? Maybe that’s the reason why many call them energy drinks. Shouldn’t be too long now until we get nuclear drinks. Phosphorus is a mineral that is essential for our health, especially our bones. It is naturally found in many of our foods, but with the widespread use of phosphoric acid in many of our manufactured drinks and foods, we can consume excessive amounts that can result in many health problems, especially for our bones. Phosphoric acid is made from the chemical processing of coke, which is made from coal. So yes, yummy stuff. Who’d have thought that consuming coal could damage our health?

Even healthy-sounding fruit juice that is made with real fruit has most of its nutrition destroyed by the pasteurization process they are put through, reducing them to little more than expensive sugary water drinks. Even a cup of tea comes with risk too, as one plastic teabag can release around 11 billion micro-plastics into the tea. Tea breaks just aren’t what they used to be. With Nano and micro-plastics almost everywhere, we are risking the health of many generations to come, as well as our own. As we can see, trying to find a decent drink can be thirsty work.

Of the over 80,000 chemicals our chemical industries produce to be sold into almost every industry, very few of them have been studied for their adverse effects on our health and environments. Any chemical that is hazardous to human health can take decades to prove or even recognise, as the financial interests of those who profit from them take priority. Even when one chemical is limited or removed from public exposure for proving to be dangerous, it can be quickly replaced with another that has yet to be declared as such, or even studied.

Knowing the effects of a chemical before exposing it to our populations may sound like a sensible idea, but not a very profitable one. So it looks like many generations will have to endure this chemical roulette with their health for some time to come.

Maybe we poison ourselves to death at a manageable percentage for generations, or we adapt a degree of immunity to the poisons we consume. Only time will tell the long-term effects the chemical age will have on us, our environments and our fellow biotic creatures. Maybe one day we will embrace our toxins and our honesty with a chain of “tasty toxins” restaurants, that will take over the world with appetising menus filled with dishes that read like –

“A pan-seared medallion of 3D printed cellular cultures with factory fed tenderized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, on a bed of caramelized forever chemicals, topped with freshly ground toxic aldehydes, accompanied by braised smoked coal tar marinated in a trans-fatty acid reduction, and a slow microwaved DBPs mousse infused with chloroform, drizzle with a glyphosates jus, sprinkle with wild oxidize chlorine trifluoride croutons and seasoned with fine Himalayan borax and organic phthalates

:- (This dish is allergy-free as well as kosher, halal, genocide, vegan and LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ friendly, of course. 15 acres of rainforest, half a mountain, 6 fresh water wells, 45 human beings, 620 mammals, 1,275 birds, 12,450 fish, 93,000,000 insects, plus a chef’s ego and self-respect were all lost in the creation of this dish.

However, as we are all about pretending to save the planet at tasty toxins, and in order to encourage our morally hypocritical customers to return time and again, we will pretend to plant a tree to counter the environmental damage this dish has caused, and give 0.0000000000000000001% of the bill to tasty toxins own charity that funds the exploitation of the children who mine the sulphur used to help create our tasty toxic treats.).”

Who wouldn’t want to eat there? Just like when the practice of smoking chemicals and drinking alcohol was widely accepted to cause harm to an unborn child, and many started to belittle mothers who did such things, maybe one day people will be belittling mothers for consuming the phthalates from plastics in the products they use. Not to encourage the belittling of mothers in any way, as many, if not most, have no clue about the effects of these chemicals on their children.

Motherhood can be challenging enough without having to investigate every lie and every harm their glorified wrongdoers inflict upon them. The idea of killing people with toxic chemicals is sold as bad, immoral or inhumane on the battlefield (cluster bombs, incendiary bombs and nuclear bombs are all extremely humane ways of murdering people, of course), but perfectly moral when used in foods and other products to kill people.

Radiating Microbial Incompetence

While on the subject of the overuse of chemicals, the overuse of medication by doctors and our medical industries will always be an issue when drug industries use financial incentives to push their products, regardless of the harm caused by over-medicating people. There are too many drugs that are overused to go into them all, but we shall delve a little into the overuse of antibiotics that these industries engage in.

Antibiotics can, of course, be very useful and even lifesaving, but often they are totally unnecessarily given to patients with little regard to the adverse effects, not to mention the effect on the evolutionary acceleration of the microbes that are being constantly exposed to these products. The overuse of antibiotics has allowed many of the microbes that can harm us to adapt and develop immunity to these drugs, rendering them ineffective at treating any infection caused by such microbes.

These resulting “superbugs” are estimated to kill over a million people and play a role in 5 million more deaths every year, while also causing illness in many. The ineffectiveness of antibiotics is likely to worsen as their overuse continues. If a doctor can buy a new car or pay for a holiday by convincing patients over a period of time to use antibiotics to treat external infections, for example, while gaining nothing from recommending honey as a cure, chances are they are going to sell the antibiotic.

Doctors are trained to marry a health condition to a patented drug in order to enrich that industry and themselves, not necessarily to seek the best course of action for a patient’s health. Many doctors know little about time tested ancient cures or remedies, as they are not as profitable for those that monopolise the industry, so most in these industries are taught to view such things as pseudo-science, while bowing to their corporate masters’ profit margins, void of any real criticism of their practices.

We cannot let the lunacy of antibacterial soaps slip by without address. Soap worked very well for thousands of years (another benefit of fats). Many made their own soap from the ash from their fires and the cooking fats from their kitchens, but this free homemade soap does not enrich our glorious few. Around the mid to late 1800s, after the soap tax was repealed in 1853 (yes, we had a soap tax for over 140 years, as clean less-thans went against our status seekers ignorances), our soap industry was allowed to take off. So soap became industrialised using animal fats and natural oils, up until cottonseed oil was used as a more profitable replacement, but as washing with it is arguably less toxic than eating it, we could argue the benefits of such a use to a degree.

In the 1990s, when many of the patents for antibiotics ran their course, our peddlers in profitable deceit found a way to sell something no one needed, as something to value. The soap industries decided to use antibiotics in soap as a sales gimmick, marketed as killing 99.9% of bacteria. It persuaded many people who believed bacteria are all bad and knew little about biology to use such a product. Normal soap can also remove 99.9% of bacteria, so it is a bit like implying that a drug laced bottle of water can hydrate us 99.9%, while ignoring the fact that an untainted bottle of water could do the same.

Antibiotics tend not to discriminate between microbes that help us and microbes that harm us, whether we are filling our bellies with them, spreading them onto our skin or spewing them into our environment. We do the microbes that have evolved to aid our existence no favours when we threaten their existence on a regular basis. As we are mostly made up of microbes, it is insane to constantly be at war with ourselves, but then again, that’s what we do within our cults of differing worth, so maybe not a huge shock

It is no coincidence that skin diseases started to increase in the 1990s, when many of us began to strip our body’s largest organ of the microbes that help maintain healthy skin. The same can be said for the rise in digestive conditions and allergies with the overconsumption of digestible antibiotics sold by doctors and in the foods we eat. As biotic creatures, we really should be a lot more diligent in using anything that is anti-us.

If we glorify ourselves as more than other forms of life, we are devaluing ourselves at the same time, as we are not exactly 100% human. If we have an average of around 30 trillion human cells and 39 trillion microbial cells, we are only about 43% human, making our human DNA outnumbered by our microbiome’s DNA, which is in effect our secondary genome. Without our microbial friends helping us out, we would not survive very long in a world full of microbes. We know many of the chemicals we expose ourselves to can cause changes or mutations in our DNA, and our microbiome’s DNA. Mutations are part of life and are important to help us adapt to ever-changing environments. A mutation may be a hindrance in one environment and an advantage in another, and we all owe our existence to them, but it’s not always wise to play genetic roulette.

Some mutations appear so consistent in a species (even if relatively rare) that we could argue that they are a result of previous environments. Like a DNA memory that activates in a percentage of a species, just in case a current environment reverts back to a previous one. They can be the result of a consistent sequence of environmental conditions or spontaneous (sort of).

We may not know all there is to know about mutations, but we could argue that what some call spontaneous mutations are far from spontaneous if they are consistent, even if at very low levels. Ignorance of various impacts of environmental factors may also play a role in misunderstanding such mutations. We do know environments play a huge role in genetic mutations, and due to our disregard for our environments as well as our own bodies, we risk causing unwanted mutations with many of our practices.

Maybe one day we will go to the doctors, and instead of selling us patented drugs, they will be able to analyse our nutritional content to see if we are deficient in any essential nutrients that may be compromising our health. But few doctors are going to get rich by telling their patients to go and eat specific foods (unless all foods as we know it are made so expensive that only more-thans can get them, while less-than are forced to consume industrial stuff that is sold as food), so it is synthetic drugs all around for now.

Perhaps we can rid ourselves of our doctor’s ignorances and greed and replace them with toilets that can analyse our urine and poo, to gauge the state of our health and even recommend alterations in our diet to remedy any imbalance, or warn us of potential health problems. A medical industry that includes real dieticians that understand the importance of nutrition and know how to protect our guts as the first line of defence against diseases, alongside our glorified drug dealers, may go some way to aid public health. However, it would not take long before dieticians are receiving financial incentives to sell certain products as healthy, even if they harm health, as corruption is just the way within cultures of greed.

The modern medical industry has specialist that only focus on one part of the human body, and just as anyone who specializes in anything can be blinded by their limitations due to a kind of tunnel vision of thought, those within our health industries are no different. Identifying the causes of a problem is the first step in finding a solution, yet our health industries often concern themselves with attempting to treat the effects of a problem, rather than recognising the source of any health issue. A problem in one part of the body can result in damage to a different part, so if a problem with the gut was causing a problem in the liver or the heart, then the medical profession will waste the time and health of the patient by getting someone that specializes in the liver or heart, and knows little to nothing about the gut, to treat such a patient.

This lunacy leads to treating symptoms rather than the root cause of the problem, but within cultures of greed, it makes financial sense to get rich off treating symptoms rather than addressing causes. As the holy grail of modern medicine is not to eliminate ill health or diseases, but to convince people to take a drug or drugs for life, incompetent healthcare will always be tolerated in hierarchal cultures. As it is in the interest of drug companies to create “health conditions” that they can attach a highly profitable drug to, rendering the human condition to something in need of treating, becomes common. The unsafe and the ineffective will always be sold as safe and effective, in order to enrich a few at the cost of others’ health and lives.

Our social hierarchal drug industries are not content in making junkies out of adults alone, as many children are now encouraged to take their daily dose of drugs. Creating child junkies not only feeds the greed of this industry but also helps to zombify the minds of potential critics. Using the same old tactics of paying “health experts” to convince people that there is a problem that can only be addressed with patented drugs, many parents are happy to feed their children an array of drugs.

With newly made-up “health conditions” like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) being created in the 1960s to boost sales of a cocktail of chemicals created decades earlier, the rebranding of normal human behaviour in children as something that needs to be fixed with drugs has become normalized for those content to feed the greed of a few. Adults can also attain such a branding in the pursuit of gaining a prescription for these “performance-enhancing” drugs, in order to give them an advantage in a particular field, but that’s a whole other story. Modern medicine allows the science of biology and nutrition to give way to the interests of the corporations that control the industry. Social hierarchies “greed is good” mantra applies to everything they touch, even if millions suffer or die in the process.

Having gone over some of the lies and wrongs committed by our glorified wrongdoers within their health industries, we may be forgiven for believing that an honest, caring, actively righteous healthcare worker is as rare as an individual with an RH-null blood type. However, like all who are imprisoned within our cultures of deceit, lying is just the language used by all social hierarchies that allows wrongdoing to become normalized. This makes anything from tolerating to committing our endless procession of wrongs, almost unavoidable for many seeking to be part of such cultures, or even just in the act of trying to eke out an existence within them.

We can make the argument that the vast majority who work within these industries will have all the good intent in the world to help others (as well as help themselves, to any degree, from basic survival to high status and wealth), but as the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Whatever our motivation, even with good intent, we are always going to be at the mercy of our glorified wrongdoers and the standards, knowledge, ignorances, practices and technological capabilities of our day. Not to mention the ball and chain of differing worth that shackles efficacy and progress. Medicine, science and every other field are held back and easily distorted by the role social status plays within our groups. Within our glorified wrongdoers utopia, too many of us can become more concerned with the things that give us personal worth, over our particular field, or even the notion of right and wrong.

The legalised drug industries, like our status seekers, are always keen to elevate their achievements, but we could argue that basic hygiene and sanitation have done more for our health than all of the drugs our elevated professions have come up with. With the spread of master/slave cultures (or civilization) forcing many slaves to live in overly populated and cramped conditions, infectious diseases were arguably our most common cause of “natural death” within these groups. This made hygiene and sanitation very important for the slave classes who are forced to live in squalor together.

Food hygiene has been important in avoiding ill health and death. Food poisoning has always been an issue for every population and still affects at least hundreds of millions of people every year. Although we could argue that food hygiene has gone a bit too far for our own good. As inflammatory diseases are now the number one cause of death in the world, and although inflammation of our cardiovascular system is the most deadly, our digestive tracts are the most exposed to the toxins we consume, so tends to be the most commonly affected with differing levels of severity. Our intestinal tracts are home to the largest number of microbes in our bodies, so treating them well is key to our health. As the microbes lining our guts are like a team of bouncers keeping out those who want to cause trouble, we don’t want to kill them off.

Many of the foods and drugs we consume destroy our gut lining. Therefore, if we don’t have enough bouncers to keep out the troublemakers, they can come in unopposed to wreak havoc. However, nature always provides us with foods that help protect our gut lining. Antibiotics can wreak havoc within any species that is reliant on its microbes for health. Imagine our microbiome as a large civilization, where all work in harmony with one another (so not a social hierarchy). Antibiotics are akin to a nuclear bomb being dropped on this civilization to reduce the population to a fraction of its previous self.

By creating a void in our civilizations ability to function as before, we invite those who lack the same ability to work in harmony, to the detriment of our civilization. A bit like our status seekers habit of invading a territory and murdering most of the population, so they can colonize it for themselves and their minions. So basically, if we destroy the microbes that keep us healthy, then we create a barren terrain ripe for colonization, which can be colonised by microbes that harm us, rather than help us. Maybe we should‘ve just led with that, but hey, metaphors are more fun.

We can take much better care of the ecosystems of our bodies and our environments by working with nature, instead of pandering to our status seekers greed and mindset of trying to conquer it. Nature holds the keys to everything and is brutally honest, but too many of us spend more time valuing the words of liars. Due to the nature of social hierarchies, many of nature’s cures and practices that aid our ecosystems and environments, that have been used in the past by those who came before us, have fallen out of fashion, and may even be lost forever. When a group of people dominate another group, they can then use their ignorances to believe those they have defeated are inferior, so the mere idea that the vanquished could possess knowledge that the conquerors lack may be of little concern or not even contemplated in the victors’ minds.

We shall no doubt discover and even rediscover less harmful cures and practices, but they will always be overshadowed by more lucrative ones that better serve the interests of a few, as we already have knowledge of harmless cures and practices, yet still pander to such greed. Maybe some time in the future, there will be more independent scientists that can work in an environment free from gross manipulation and corporate interests, which can allow many to gain a modicum of integrity and be capable of respecting their chosen field, as well as their fellow human beings. OK, maybe not. Probably better for our less-thans to just form their own scientific communities that by-pass our sockmakers minions. Perhaps it is more likely that one corporation will own every life form on the planet, including us. For now, we must endure the corporate stranglehold on our health and scientific communities, with their endless contradictions and lies that they require.

It is not only our food and drugs that threaten our health but our tools too. The radiation from the technology we use has been proven to damage our health. The electromagnetic radiation that bombards many of us can cause an array of health problems and even death, and this can be especially impactful on children who are still developing to maturity. The fact that many countries around the world use Wi-Fi in schools suggests a distinct disregard for children’s health, and/or the dangers of such long-term exposure pose to us.

Many of our children may have to pay the price for our lack of precautions regarding our new technologies with their future health. Even if we believe that there is little to no danger, it would not take much to protect our future and our most vulnerable group by at least taking the precaution of using wired connections within schools and even public places. But within our cultures of greed, our status seekers interest come before all.

As our Covid-19 orchestrators showed how easy it is to convince 80% of a population to accept any nonsense with just a little scaremongering and a whole bunch of lies, imagine if our glorified wrongdoers wished to depopulate our species when they have machines that will fulfil all of their needs and desires. All it would take would be another pretend “vaccine” to some overhyped doomsday infection, which would sterilise all who take it or just a specific targeted group. This ensures that only the conspirators chosen groups reproduce while sparing them the messy business of having to kill billions of people. There would only be that pesky 20% that would avoid anything our glorified wrongdoers touch, left to face enslavement or a more direct form of murder.

Once we started on the slippery slope of patenting life itself in 1981, the inevitable response from our cultures of greed has led to today’s monopolists desperate to clamber on board a gravy train that only stops when the life forms they claim to own are changed or become extinct. Just as the thought of someone owning nature and the life forms it houses would have been laughable to many of our ancestors, the idea that our descendants will themselves be owned by someone who owns the patent on human DNA may seem ridiculous to many today, but may be sold as normal to them, as owning so-called lesser life forms is sold to many today. With DNA reduced to a patented product that can be owned by an individual or small group, it won’t be too long before our glorified wrongdoers are patenting human DNA in order to ensure all are owned and enslaved to those who hold the patents.

Adding genetic slavery to the evolution of our master/slave cults may see a decline in debt slavery and traditional slavery, as total ownership of human beings would render debts and chains as unnecessary tools of enslavement. Maybe our descendants will celebrate their genetic slavery with the abolition of debt slavery, in the same way many debt slaves do with the so-called abolition of traditional slavery, despite its continued and growing use. Believing themselves to be free as they are forced to bow to the will of a few, is not exactly an unknown phenomenon among our slave populations, and if we can be genetically engineered to be compliant and obedient without the need for indoctrination, propaganda or paying for an army of liars and idiots to repeat what we need to be repeated to encourage others to value differing worth, our glorified wrongdoers utopia would be complete.

The Immortal Fear

We cannot end our chapter on the subject of health without touching on life’s dance partner, death. After all, who doesn’t enjoy a bit of life is death, and death is life, and all that. We may live in cults obsessed with ownership, but in life, we own nothing, as everything we have is borrowed from nature, and nature will always reclaim all that belongs to it (we shall try to keep the philosophy of life and death to a minimum). So in many ways, we are all nature’s debt slaves as we must always pay back what we borrowed from nature (void of interest). This does not stop many of us from being able to go through life and all that it holds, without adopting others delusions of immortality. The delusion of our own self-importance may aid us in convincing others in a group to put more value on our lives over others, but nature cares little for our delusions.

We all experience loss. We lose loved ones, relationships, abilities, dreams, trust, meaning, purpose, joy…etc. Everything is temporary, yet many of us cling to the lie that our life, love or manicured reputations can somehow outlast the vastness of time, just so we can wallow in our delusions or avoid the inevitability of our ultimate fate of nothingness. Our status seekers can become so deluded by their own self-importance that they try to take their riches with them when they die, as even in death they wish their greed to flourish. In many ways, this shows a profound level of ignorance that can be maintained over the course of a lifetime. But perhaps no surprise within the den of lies all hierarchal cults create. Death, like life itself, becomes distorted and bastardised within a social hierarchy in order to serve the interests of a few. The ignorances, denials and superficial perceptions geared towards death serve hierarchies well in that they help to misdirect their slaves from understanding the nature of their reality and very existence, in favour of their hierarchies manufactured servile ones.

As if telling their slaves how to live was not bad enough, they insist on telling them how to die. The concept of a glorious death is used by all social hierarchies to glorify the acts of wrongdoing that serve their interests. This is to encourage many within their populations to value those interests that are wrapped in layers of deceit. Those who die while engaged in such acts are automatically branded as brave, righteous and valued members of society, even when engaging in obvious acts of wrongdoing.

If an army of 1000 heavily armed wrongdoers are paid to steal the property of one rightdoer, but meet resistance from that rightdoer, the 1000 wrongdoers are still branded as brave righteous heroes, while the rightdoer defending their rights, family or property is branded as a wrongdoer, and all sorts of other things. Any harm or even deaths among the 1000 wrongdoers are tragedies, while the rightdoer’s harm or death is sold as deserved and righteous, according to our glorified wrongdoers, of course. In our hierarchies’ raids that are sold as war, it is much easier to glorify and demonise the dead than the badly injured, whose broken bodies and minds reflect the true brutality of war. Survivors always pose the threat of voicing the truth, while the dead can be anything their hierarchy wants them to be.

With much research suggesting around a 50% child mortality rate throughout our history, we may come to understand the need for many to deny the finality of death, given the depth of sorrow the loss of a child can hold, as well as the difficulty many face when questioned by a dying child about the finality of death. Today, in no small thanks to the acceptance of hygienic practices, infant mortality (under 5) has dramatically decreased. However, with some parts of the world having less than 1% of people dying within their first 5 years of life, while others have more than 10% of their children dying very young, the differing worth of our hierarchies holds great influence over our children’s chances of reaching adulthood.

What many now call our social-economic background (how many socks we have) can play a huge role in our ability to survive beyond infancy, even in so-called wealthy countries. Two to three times as many people die within their first year if their parents belong to a less-than group rather than a more-than group, even within hierarchies with the most wealth and status. When the richest can outlive the poorest by around 15 years thanks to a vastly more comfortable lifestyle, even in our hierarchies so-called “most advanced” populations, it is perhaps no wonder many are willing to do any wrong to accumulate the socks of human worth.

Death is often a taboo subject that must be whispered about or confined to “therapists” or “help groups”, that is when religions hierarchies aren’t trying to monopolise it. Even in hospitals and care homes where many go to die, death is treated as something to be hidden. The dying are often not even told they are dying, doped up and patronized in their final days or moments, with those closest to them denied the wise words that come from many of those aware of their end, as when stripped of all the things that hold superficial meaning, we can free our minds to focus on the things that gave us true meaning. Granted, for many who gain great meaning from the superficial, it may be better to dope them up. So swings and roundabouts. In our cultures that deny the existence of death by reducing it to some superficial concept of transformation that merely elongates our existence into some imaginary eternity, we have little to no practical knowledge to share with one another that goes beyond the healing power of time.

The depths of sorrow, anger and disinterest in everything around us that can come from the loss of those closest to us is largely avoided rather than addressed by the pseudo-communities our hierarchies produce. We should not be too surprised that empty words and gestures are the best that we can expect from those who pretend a permanent loss is temporary, as when we fail to understand anything, our false reactions often match our false perceptions.

A great sorrow teaches us much if we embrace all that it offers instead of hiding it away to appease the ignorances of those around us, but few of us are taught prior to our first great sorrow of what it entails, so the loss can be compounded without the knowledge that could aid in the coping of the experience. Even the basics of a loss like the “why” is rarely addressed with the knowledge of life or just a “why not”, and many are left to torment themselves in this stage unnecessarily. Pain is the price of joy.

We could imagine that getting through a lifetime without a great sorrow would be a great thing, but we could argue that a life that is ignorant of such a thing is a life that only experiences half of what it is to be alive. We could argue that Ignorance of a great sorrow can limit our understanding and appreciation of much in life, but with the knowledge that a great sorrow gives us, we can heighten our appreciation of many things. It would be rare if not impossible to only know love and joy without knowing a great sorrow, or to only know sorrow and be ignorant of love and joy. If we have joy without pain or pain without joy, then we can never truly understand either.

They are connected and one balances the other. Sorrow is the price of love, and often completes our understanding of it. Avoiding the truth of death is always going to be used by masters to encourage their slaves to accept the wrongs they experience, as the promise of a better life after they are dead guarantees a lifetime of exploitation of those susceptible enough to believe such an obvious lie. If we ignore the truths of death, we ignore the truths of life.

As immortals, we can never fully appreciate the finality of death, nor the true joys of life, when forever suspended within a cocoon of a perceptual endless existence. The fear of death in itself is a rather futile pastime, as our existence and our death do not overlap, though the realization of our impending death prior to the end of our existence may leave us with regret of unfulfilled actions, but whether we interpret that as a fear or just a disappointment, may vary between individuals. A more rational fear may be a concern for those we leave behind or the cause of our death, especially if it is anything other than dying in our sleep.

Accepting the impermanence of life may be a struggle for some of us, but we can also struggle with the impermanence of who and what we are within the differing stages of life. From infancy to old age and everything in between, every stage is as fleeting as the next. We may view ourselves (psychologically at least) as a constant throughout our lives, but what we are at one stage and what we are at another can vary to a differing degree among individuals, even if we are oblivious to those differences. We are all of these stages and none of these stages to a degree, but we can often define ourselves by our past and even future self, while ignoring our present self.

As the very young and the very old generally have less interest or ability in harming others than those mired in the mating years of differing worth, we often have more empathy and less malice in our early and later years of life. Our beginning overlaps with others end, and our end overlaps with others beginning, and although we are all at the mercy of the differing levels of malice and benevolence of those around us, we are arguably more so at our beginning and end. However, we always have a choice at any stage of life on how much malice or benevolence we share towards others. We could argue that the closest we come to immortality (for those who accept the inevitability of our perceptual meaninglessness) is with the passing on of our genes, but we could argue our genes are not really ours, as they too were given to us, making us just a self-glorified passer of a baton of genes. So, in effect just another thing we borrowed from nature that must be returned.

Perhaps the closest we can come to living beyond our lifetime is for us to live on in those who feel our loss. If we have given them anything of worth to use and pass on to others, then maybe a small part of what we were lives on. Many adopt their understanding of death from religious hierarchies that care so little about life (other than their own) that they will happily commit every wrong to maintain their elevated worth, while attempting to convince as many as they can that they are morally superior. Anyone valuing the lies of these obvious manipulators often develop little interest in understanding much outside of their manipulators’ lies, so for many of us, when it comes to life and death, ignorance is bliss. However, if we use our master’s gods to avoid reality, we can deny ourselves the knowledge grief shares.

Unlike our sockmakers, nature only takes back what it gave. There is no interest put on what we borrowed from nature, as we cannot return what we do not have. Within our cultures of sock worshippers, where many can’t afford to live, many also can’t afford to die. Those deemed unworthy of a free life are also deemed unworthy of a free death, as our cultures of greed paw over many of the carcasses they have a hand in creating.

The chains of debt that restrict the lives of many and even the mass thievery that is sold as death taxes are used to rob any wealth out of those we leave behind. Even how we deal with the dead is monopolised by our glorified wrongdoers. Most populations adopt the death rituals (like many other rituals) of their hierarchy regardless of how ridiculous they may be, and many try to emulate their glorified wrongdoers as much as they can, but for status seekers to continue the facade of differing worth in death, they are often just require to partake in anything that appears to be more than those seen as less-than do.

When it comes to our status-seeking pretenders, their shows in life may never end, so that equality can be avoided, but not in death. Perhaps the equality of death is why it is denied by many status seekers who find anything that challenges their delusions of superiority hard to swallow.

Anyway, no matter the number of people or stuff we surround our end with, no matter the lies or the truths we value, no matter our wrongs or our rights, nature consumes us all. Whether we die suddenly or from a long-drawn-out illness, young or old, rich or poor, valued or devalued, happy or miserably, demonised or glorified, loved or unloved, death treats us all the same. The equality of death is part of the beauty of life, and maybe at some level, this is why many within our grossly unequal cultures hate death so much, as it shows us the beauty of equality that we are often denied in life within such groups.

Chapter 10

The Tools We Make

Life on our planet has created perhaps trillions (if not more) of different life forms with many amazing abilities. Some have the ability to survive being chopped up, fly up to 37,000 feet, run up to 75mph, swim up to 80mph, grow new limbs when one is lost, survive 30 years without eating, revert to their youth to become almost immortal, survive being frozen and some even shape shift while mimicking different environments, to name but a tiny few of the superpowers nature concocts. The various abilities that life has evolved in order to adapt to its environments or to gain an advantage within them is almost endless.

The special ability that we can claim to have mastered more than any other (at least, in our own time) is our ability to make tools. As master toolmakers, we have given ourselves the ability to do things we could never achieve otherwise. This is our superpower. One of our biggest assets as a tool-making species is the human hand, with the thumb as the superstar that allows us to be the greatest toolmakers on the planet, with a little help from our brains, of course.

Many may champion our brains as our greatest asset, but we could argue that our hands eclipse our brains. After all, what use is a highly intelligent brain that has no ability to physically manipulate its environment to the degree that the hand can? Although we could argue that there is nothing we manipulate more than each other. Our tools help us survive and thrive, and we can create tools to aid every aspect of our lives and dramatically transform our abilities, as well as our cultures.

With every new tool we make, we create the possibility of making more advanced ones and developing new fields, as well as our level of understanding, but within the oppressive cultures of social hierarchies, our tool-making is shackled by the laborious pace and suffocating nature that gross greed and inequality inspires.

If we know little about the development of our tools, we may be able to convince ourselves that our technology advances at a fast pace, but understanding the environments that many of our tools are created in tells a different story. As only a tiny percentage within such populations are involved in tool development, and with the requirement of putting profits ahead of innovation and quality, our tool development is always going to be held back by greed, just like every other field.

In fact, we now not only hold it back but actively regress our technology, as the practice of going backwards in technology in order to increase profits is better at feeding the greed of the few. Those in control of our hierarchies’ corporations are primarily only interested in monopolising an industry or field to accumulate wealth and status for themselves. Corporations do not exist in order to create better tools or a better world for all to live in, no matter what their marketing teams say.

With greed as the main motivator, every industry is incentivised to produce cheap, poor-quality products that will fail a lot sooner than they otherwise would, in order to force their customers (or victims) to return time and time again after each failure. With all hierarchal industries monopolised, there is little to no option for “customers” to seek better products, as better alternatives are destroyed, hidden, oppressed, or just stolen in order to maintain mass mediocre merchandise.

Similar to the drug industry, our technology industries have adopted the strategy of creating returning customers that generates a lifetime of profits, over the one off customers that come with tools that last a lifetime or even a generation, that are nowhere near as profitable.

Planned obsolescence is the term used to excuse technological regression and the abundance of poor quality products that are designed to only last as long as the manufacturers guarantee, which is rarely more than a year or two. Our cultures of waste compound their greed by making it more expensive to repair any product than it would be to buy a new one, meaning many end up becoming regular customers. Our sockmakers minions encourage this wastefulness while pretending to care for our environments, as a one-time purchase generates a one-time tax, whereas a lifetime of purchases generate a lifetime of tax income.

Only within cultures brimming with status seekers would this highly wasteful and grossly inefficient nonsense be valued. Status is often used to sell the very idea of planned obsolescence, as status seekers are encouraged to get the latest self-destructing product if they wish to gain or maintain any of the superficial status that their fellow status seeker spew onto one another. This allows the more ignorant among us to define ourselves and others by the products in our possession, rather than the qualities any individual possesses.

The arguably very male obsession with being first ensures we often put the practice of being among the first to buy the sub-par tools we make, above the quality and effectiveness of our tools, as well as many other things. The scale of waste that comes with “planned obsolescence” is bad enough, but when we consider our cultures need to waste and destroy unsold products to encourage the purchase of the latest range (that also satisfies the superficial exclusivity that status seekers value), the waste becomes obscene. But that’s social hierarchies for you.

Just as tons of food are destroyed and binned to maintain market values, so are tons of new tools destroyed for the same reasons, as giving them away would devalue any product as well as any status attached to those products in the eyes of status seekers. Wherever there is social status, there are liars, so those who benefit from this nonsense use all sorts of lies to justify their wastefulness, but one of the most common of late has become the “saving the planet” lie.

We endure these pathetic attempts from corporations that try to convince anyone they can of their sincerity when they claim to do something to “save the planet”, based on the amount of products they sell, even from those who aid in and profit from the destruction of our environments, in order to produce their products. Even within these lies, they are admitting to not giving a damn about the environments they destroy, as it implies they will do nothing to aid those environments if they do not sell X amount of products.

With many of our glorified wrongdoers and their sycophants championing the idea of reducing our environmental impact and the cycles of our planet to a sales gimmick, we are not only exposed to politicians using this lie to serve their own interests, but every industry is now doing the same. Corporations that destroy forests and enslave communities into poverty, ironically, try to buy some superficial social acceptance of their wrongdoing with gimmicks like planting a tree and sponsoring children in extreme poverty.

Corporations that steal and poison the water that many communities rely on, make sure their customer hear more about their “build a well” and “clean up contaminated water” charities, rather than their main activities. Corporations encourage their customers to recycle to reduce waste, while they needlessly contribute tons of their temporary products to landfills, the seas, and anywhere else they can dump them out of sight from most of their customers. Corporations have charities to save animals, while they kill them off, and charities to clean the oceans, while they pump more and more toxins into them.

Using the old charity fraud that only cultures that value wrongdoing need to use in order to appear less malicious than they are to the less aware among them is a practice that their corporations mirror as they pretend to be moral in some way. Every industry now covers themselves and their greed with the veil of “charities” and “foundations” in order to hide what they are. Offering no solutions other than selling the idea of more money in their pockets as their answer to everything. Many (mostly status seekers) state with one breath the importance of feeding the greed of a few, while pretending with the next breath to care about the inevitable consequences of such actions. With every industry getting a degree of public support from using their charities and foundations to hide their wrongs, they will continue reek of the stench of hypocrisy from their pseudo-charities as long as they aid their greed.

Another lie our hypocritical industries have hitched their wagons to is their recycling efforts, which comes as part of the “saving the planet” facade. Planned obsolescence is to recycling what social hierarchies are to justice and equality. Many parts of the world consist of populations that choreograph the separation of their waste into different bins in the belief that it will be recycled. Yet it is often all dumped in the same place.

So we have the farce of hierarchies encouraging their populations to recycle, while also encouraging constant consumerism. As constant consumerism ensures an unnecessary excess in waste and pollution, we require many ignorances to value their “save the planet lie”, but many still fall for it. The more people buy, the more their hierarchy takes. Gross domestic product, or GDP, is often built on how much they can steal from their populations, and most social hierarchies define themselves by this ridiculous measure, with our most prolific thieves being heralded as the most “successful” empires.

We are more than capable of creating vastly superior products that last more than a lifetime and can be easily repaired if damaged, just as we have in the past. Groups like the Amish are an example of one of the few that maintain our more natural attitude towards technology, in that they tend to only use technology that they themselves can make and repair. Therefore, they are not dependent on the whims and greed of any group of wrongdoers who spend their time in boardrooms conjuring up more and more ways to fleece their customers. Groups that make and repair their own tools are more independent than groups that have to buy their tools from a monopoly. Therefore, such groups must be discouraged by our sockmakers and their minions who rely on the dependency of their victims.

If we made our own tools, then we would value quality so that we could ideally use any tool for the rest of our lives, rather than have to spend our time every year or so making the same tool from scratch. Good quality tools alone would help our environments vastly more than any amount of charities, sponsored walks, bungee jumps, holidays or any other pastime activity that is sold as a moral sacrifice of some kind. But what self-respecting status seeker would not want to burn down the world before relinquishing any of their status? Not looking great for our environments, it has to be said.

The products we produce within social hierarchies must come in various levels of quality in order to feed the ignorance of differing worth, as more-thans don’t want to use the same stuff as less-than. Valuing exclusiveness more than inclusiveness results in an often unnecessary variation of quality in products being created to pander to this ignorance. An ignorance that can be exploited when products are identical in every way, but some are sold as more-than in order to extract more from status seekers.

This often very unnecessary variation in the quality of products also contributes to the enormous wastefulness in such cultures. Tools, buildings, services, transportations and all kinds of things are designed for people at differing placements along their hierarchy’s spectrum of worth. From accommodation and homes, to technology and furniture, everything comes with more-than and less-than versions. Our status seekers class system allows them to wallow in their ignorances, so such practices will always have value within hierarchies and continue to be used in their industries and products.

As most, if not all, within our master classes are too immersed in the intelligence ignorance to even recognise any population’s potential to innovate at a great pace, our cultures of greed can never take advantage of our collective intelligence to produce advanced tools at any real pace. With the use of poverty and social status to create our master/slave cultures, the slave classes are regarded as less innovative than the master classes by many who champion the ignorances of such cultures.

Monopolising the Idea of Monopolising Ideas

Within these cultures, large-scale innovation is highly limited and mostly monopolised by our sockmakers, who, aided by their legal industry that governs over the ownership of any idea or invention, can control our tool-making industries. So no danger of any fraud there then! Those who pander to the whims of these industries can attain inventorship that gives them moral rights to their own invention, but not economic rights, so whoopee doo for that then. In effect, low-status inventors can have the morals of their inventions, while high-status individuals can steal the wealth. Economic rights, or proprietary rights, are reserved for the ownership of any invention, whoever that may be (mostly the hierarchy), and not necessarily the inventor(s).

It is rare for any low-status individual (who manages to retain ownership of their inventions) to slide along their hierarchy’s social scale of worth, as they must fend off the high-status thieves that circle around anything that appears valuable. Those unable to afford to produce their inventions are often forced to sell ownership of their inventions to those who can. Inventors can even have the ownership of their inventions taken from them when created within a master/slave relationship, where all the slaves’ property (physical or intellectual) belongs to the master. The modern-day version of this being the employer/employee relationship that is common around the world. When wealth (as well as many other social conformities) is required to maintain ownership of an invention, it is not difficult to understand why many don’t even bother to pursue their ideas within cultures that put a cap on human potential and invention, in favour of superficial social worth.

The notion of owning an invention obviously holds great value among status seekers in order to satisfy their need for wealth and status, but patents and the monopolising of inventions are not exactly a very social or effective way to go about developing any new inventions. As human beings, we are capable of valuing our beliefs or delusions of ownership over other human beings, so we are not going to find it too difficult to extend this view of ownership to an idea or a discovery, even if it is not our own or even original.

The patent system is all about controlling and monopolising our inventions purely for the interests of a few individuals, and even with puppet social hierarchies being the norm in a world conquered by status seekers, not all social hierarchies value the “Patent Cooperation Treaty” as they try to gain any advantage they can over each other. Of course, this may have more to do with the relationships between hierarchies and those that govern such treaties than any desire to avoid restricting technological development.

For those disinterested in the “Patent Cooperation Treaty”, they can fall back on the “Paris Convention for the Protection of Intellectual Property”, in an attempt to protect any inventions, or at least share in a little of any wealth and status they may create. Our modern times show the effects of the shackles of patents, as groups constrained by them lag behind the technological advancements of those void of such restrictions.

While it may be easy for some to despair at having patents put the brakes on human innovation, we could argue that within cultures that glorify every wrong, it does make sense for those within these environments to try and protect themselves from the tsunami of wrongdoing that is all around them. However, if our glorified wrongdoers and their armies of minions want our inventions, they can always take them from us without too much fuss.

Our sockmaker uses things like the “Patents Act” and “Invention Secrecy Act” to steal technology that could upset their control. As new technology can make whole industries redundant, this is obviously something any master/slave society needs to control in order to prevent their slaves from having any ability to free themselves from bondage. Our sockmakers have stolen and suppressed thousands of inventions in the last few decades alone, and we can only guess how many were murdered for not wanting to have their inventions stolen. Let’s look at the example of solar panels. Now we have used solar panels for a long time, and there is a history of oppression since our forced reliance on oil, as oil is a lot easier to monopolise than the sun. This is why the invention of highly effective solar panels have been stolen using these Acts to ensure the slave classes are dependent on their masters’ oil.

Once our masters had used their planned obsolescence practices to create a totally inferior product (that they could sell without being a threat to their control), the slave classes could buy these inferior products. So we live in a time where “Highly effective energy systems” are deemed to be such a danger to our masters’ lifestyles that if we invent anything (or sell older tech) that is more effective and cheaper than oil, then we are criminals who must be removed from society. Let’s just absorb the level of malice that comes with declaring any achievement in creating highly effective energy tools as a threat to society, rather than being celebrated and used.

The patent system within our master/slave cultures is obviously going to be viewed as wonderful for masters, but within a more egalitarian group of people, it would not hold much worth if sharing and advancing the development of inventions were more important than a few being seen as more-than. In our cultures of greed, inventors often develop their inventions in secrecy in order to gain much of the wealth it may produce, but if all were equal in wealth and status, there would be no need for any such cloak and dagger behaviour. Every inventor understands many of the uses for their invention, but there will always be others who will come up with inventive ways to use any tool that the inventor never envisaged, as well as improve on an inventor’s product design, quality, effectiveness,.…etc.

It is not difficult to imagine a society that produces high-quality products for all, where inventions, designs and ideas are valued based on their merits, rather than on the social status of individuals or the worth it gives to a few. Imagine Inventors could share their inventions at the idea and development stage with millions of like-minded folk, void of any notion of hoarding wealth, status or recognition for themselves, many inventions would advance at a much faster pace. There would be no need to produce a series of underdeveloped products to be sold in various stages of usefulness in order to generate vastly more income, over-producing a complete product from the start.

Many would argue that we have had such cultures that have been wiped from our master’s versions of history. The ancient buildings and technology that can’t be recreated today, as well as our MOEM’s desire to destroy and hoard any remnants or evidence that even hints at anything other than the endless caveman/hunter-gatherer lie of human history, which is used to explain all that came before our recent great and glorious oppressors, suggests we have lost much of what we once had.

When we also factor in our MOEM’s pseudo-geniuses that are used to sell the development and monopolisation of a technology, it’s rather obvious that there is little incentive to produce technology outside of its ability to enslave others and glorify a few. So when it comes to a culture that appreciates advanced technology, it looks like we’re going to need our imagination for many generations to come, thus we will keep taking many of our ideas to our death beds for now.

Although inventors can often see their inventions used in ways they themselves would never have thought of, some may ponder over their inventions being used to cause great harm. But if we were to limit or cease our tool-making in an attempt to limit harm, we would still be killing each other with sticks and stones. Wrongdoers will use anything they can to facilitate their wrongs. As soon as any new technology is created, our glorified wrongdoers are conspiring of every conceivable way it can be used to aid in the wrongs they engage in.

This conspiring to harm is not caused by any new tool, but is merely a mainstay of every social hierarchy. No invention causes harm without the harmful intent of its users, and social hierarchies are brimming with harmful intent due to the malice status-seeking requires. This need for elevated worth will always drive us to harm one another, no matter what we create or invent. Even if we created a world of abundance, where all have more than enough (as we already can), those who seek a higher status than others would still be driven to harm in an attempt to gain elevated worth. Suffering from the ignorance of differing worth will always hold us back.

As a result of planned obsolescence holding such great value within our modern industries, many of those who create, engineer and develop products have less and less value as their craft is reduced to a profit margin. People who value creativity and standards are replaced with sales and marketing teams. Good quality products at reasonable prices are replaced with the more profitable strategy of cheap and poor quality products being overpriced. A good quality product arguably needs little help to sell, whereas great marketing needs little quality in its products. A creator of quality products will have pride in their product, whereas a sales team takes pride in the amount they sell. It is perhaps no surprise that cultures built on lies put lying above tool innovation.

As our sales and marketing folk are busy inventing lies and our inventors are busy inventing tools, we could argue that both are inventive in their own ways. Under the burden of a social status society where sycophantism is a base skill, many with a desire for innovation and development within any field must pander to this pompous system and tread lightly around the elaborate and unnecessarily complicated protocols that many status seekers enjoy, as well as the ignorances and incredibly fragile egos of those bestowed with status within their chosen field.

In order for every industry within a social hierarchy to suppress the development of their technologies, they first suppress the development of their populations. Their education systems and then their overly hierarchal workforces are great examples of how to stifle development. With wealth and status on the line, it is not in the interests of many to pass their skills and understanding onto others, as this could threaten an individual’s wealth and status.

Gross inequality may be great at creating an obedience workforce, but when maintaining a base survival is the only incentive, it is awful for creating an innovative workforce. The master/slave relationships of these industries produce very few positions for masters, and an overabundance of slave positions that constantly need to be filled. Anyone who reaches a master position or masters their field is not going to be too keen on teaching others to attain their level of status or competence (although competence is rarely a prerequisite for lofty positions within any social hierarchy), as those they teach could threaten to take their position.

This causes high inefficiency in every field, as knowledge and skills are guarded instead of shared, just to maintain the illusion of differing worth. Good teachers are like good leaders in that they have a desire for their students/followers to attain the same level of skill and knowledge, while hoping they will surpass them. Unfortunately, they are a rarity within our cultures of greed, where the individual’s prosperity is more important than the group’s. So instead, many of us must decipher any skills or knowledge we can from those intent on being viewed as more-than others, while many more-thans hope we fail or fall short in some way, in order to confirm their value in the more-than/less-than ignorances. It’s all enough to encourage anyone to be self-taught.

These are among just some of the obstacles that smother ideas, and with so many barriers to innovation, we can understand why social hierarchies take many generations to achieve any real advancements in their technologies, with only the greed of a few as their main motivators. For many of us having travelled many miles in a motorized mode of transport, to come to be sitting in our heated or air-conditioned homes, ordering our food to be delivered to our doors and entertain ourselves on our electronic devices, our technologies may appear to be wonderful, and we could even argue that they are to a degree (mostly in relation to the lie of our never-ending stone age, rather than what could be), but we could also argue that they could have been wonderful a long time ago, as well as being a lot more advanced than they are today.

Our tools often make our lives easier in some ways, but they don’t necessarily equate to making our lives better, especially as almost every tool is used to facilitate our glorified wrongdoers’ wrongs. The advances we make with our technologies may be tediously slow, but they dwarf the advances we make in our social structures. With many of the tools we make being used to harm others within our cults of differing worth, we could argue that the best tool we could ever create or recreate would be a social structure that awarded everyone the same level of worth. Although maybe a rogue AI has a better chance of achieving this than we do.

Aye AI

Speaking of Artificial Intelligence (no, not those who are overvalued by schools for their ability to repeat, but the computer kind), computers have become a tool which many of us take for granted. With the computer age upon us and the internet connecting the world in ways many who came before us could never have dreamed about, it is a double-edged sword for our social hierarchies and the slave nations they control. With so many of us now using electronic devices to live our lives, it has never been easier for hierarchies to spy on their targets and harm anyone who even shares a thought that is not championed by their hierarchy.

Now that most of the world has been forced to transform their wealth into digital currencies that are monopolised by a few, our glorified wrongdoers and their minions don’t even have to leave their homes or even their beds to steal from those they declare as less-than, or anyone who dares to question any of the tsunami of lies they create. At the same time, our nations of slaves have never before had the ability to communicate with one another and seek knowledge with as much ease as they now can, albeit under the scrutiny of their hierarchy. With slaves being able to share the truth to a much wider audience than ever before, it is no wonder most hierarchies around the world are desperately trying to convince anyone who wishes to be seen as more than others that they should be offended by any truth that exposes any lie their hierarchy champions.

This farce has led to grown adults (well, status seekers) who are terrified to state any truth that has not been approved by their cult leaders, leading to our spineless flatterers of gross wrongdoers unable to even define a male or a female, in fear of losing their wealth and status to someone who is prepared to abandon all reason in exchange for elevated worth. Hierarchies have always belittled those who fail to value their lies, so the hysteria around words has always been encouraged and commonplace within our malicious cultures. However, there is a lot more need for this practice now that less-thans can bypass the lying industries propaganda, to find out and share what is really happening in their communities and around the world.

Let’s, for a moment, descend into the void of sanity that is the hysterically offended. This practice is obviously just another orchestrated nonsense used by status seekers to vary human worth, but within such things, there will always be many who genuinely adopt these behaviours with meaning attached to it in order to gain some kind of belonging. Now, different individuals and even cultures will find genuine offence at many different things, usually at the behest of their masters, but the hysterically offended often give a theatrical performance to sell their declared outrage at the most benign of things.

Their over-reactions are often encouraged by more-thans in order to validate a narrative or agenda, or just to score points in a debate or even shut down a debate completely. The depth of offence status seekers feign or adopt when displaying their emotional fragility at the sounds we make is often matched by their indifference to actual wrongs and real harms. This allows them to champion the persecution of those who do no wrong, while glorifying any wrong committed by their glorified wrongdoers. As seeking offence is just a part of seeking status, exaggerated offence will be with us for some time, as it is just another tool our glorified wrongdoers use to harm those they wish to portray as less-than.

As social hierarchies desperately try to limit and control the sharing of experiences and knowledge among their populations, social media has become a language battleground. So it is no surprise that such platforms are controlled by social hierarchies and our sockmaker’s secret services, given the very real threat a knowledgeable population poses to any group of glorified wrongdoers. As if any population knew half the wrongs their glorified wrongdoers engage in, they would be doing more than locking them behind bars. Social media is a wonderful tool, but of course, like all tools, it can be used to help or to harm, and under social hierarchies, to harm is to win.

As social media is in its infancy, our hierarchies are arguably still in the early stages of finding the best ways to use it to oppress their populations using the tried and tested lies and misinformation that usually work. Although to be fair, we only have to look at these things to so how well they are doing at it. Our hierarchies have already used it to varying degrees to condition their populations to police themselves with a system of social worth being awarded or denied, depending on how well people serve the interests of their hierarchy. Now this is nothing new, as all social hierarchies have and always will do this, but with the aid of technology to communicate with anyone, wherever they may be, comes the inevitable threat of hierarchies using that technology to closely surveil and harm those who fail to treat them as the gods they like to see themselves as.

Social media often gets a bad press, inevitably from our sockmaker’s state-controlled media. However, it is just a reflection of who and what we are. It is not the cause of hate or wrongs as these contrived media try to sell it as. Our glorified wrongdoers armies of minions (and bots), who are well-paid to spew their hierarchies hate and lies into such platforms, have a lot more to do with the negativity that social media is often saddled with, more so than those who use it to communicate with their wider community.

Social media can be a wonderful tool for people to stay in touch and achieve real changes that benefit us all, rather than just a glorified few. But with its ability to unite, rally and organise the slave classes, it can also be used by hierarchies to infiltrate any groups that may form to address their oppression. Free speech of any kind is now rebranded as hate speech by hierarchies whose own speech is riddled with hate, while their genuine ill-intent hate speech is glorified when their hate is pointed in the direction of anyone they have demoted to less-than.

The oppressed can use social media to express their social discontent (for now anyway), as it is one of the few public forums they have access to. And let’s face it, most have every right to be discontent living under a social hierarchy. Discontent can easily turn to anger, but if people don’t know who or what they are angry at, then they often turn their anger onto each other and those who are undeserving it.

Misinformation and lies are very effective at manipulating our highly ignorant populations, or at least causing enough apathy to ensure most do nothing about the wrongs raging around them. Hierarchies, for this reason, encourage the polarizing of groups to cause any kind of division in their populations, as this can cause enough confusion to steer their slaves’ anger and discontent anywhere but in their direction. Social media, like all our other forms of media, will always be used to sell wrongs as rights and rights as wrongs within our cultures of differing worth.

Something else our glorified wrongdoers don’t like to be pointed in their direction is cameras, while they point hordes of them at their populations. The camera is one of the greatest tools we have created, and with the ability to accurately record anything, it can have a huge effect on our cultures and behaviours. This tool allows us to share so much more with one another than ever before, but of course, sharing within our cultures of greed will always be a crime, especially if less-thans are sharing the wrongs of more-thans. The camera allows a glimpse into the realities of war for many who believed their hierarchies’ lies about how great and glorious war is, and although many still believe such lies, cameras allow us to gain a depth of understanding on many things that few other tools can.

Recording our true knowledge for others is arguably one of the most loving things we can do for one another (hint, hint), but recording our glorified wrongdoers and their minions at work is not something any social hierarchy wants. Hierarchies like to be the ones in control of the records of events so that they can doctor those records to align with their lies. But now that many of those they wrong every day can record those wrongs for the world to see, hierarchies have never had such difficulty in masking their true nature. Many can now expose the injustices they experience and the criminals of high social status who commit such acts. Thus, slaves can get a better depth of understanding about what they face, even if their masters’ justice systems reward those wrongs.

As our glorified wrongdoers shy away from cameras they have no control over, while using them to criminalize anyone they can extort or abuse. This leads to our lovers of hypocrisy declaring that only special people are allowed to use cameras to record interactions. The usual tactics of glorifying and belittling are used to convince the less aware of the endless lies that all social hierarchies sell. By championing their corporate media that is so owned that they are forced to spin every story with the narratives their owners tell them to, word for word, these controlled “journalists” are labelled as real journalists. While anyone recording the truth that exposes their lies, is called all sorts of derogatory terms.

The fine art of pointing a camera and pressing a button to capture an event is heralded as something only special people (obedient slaves) are qualified to do by those mired in status and wishing to stop others recording them in the act of wrongdoing. If everyone had a camera when dealing with any of our social hierarchies and their minions, many would see their true intent. However, for now, many glorified wrongdoers will insist that cameras can’t be used in their presence and often treat such acts as a crime, even when they claim to be public servants.

In the modern online town square of social media, our social hierarchies do what they have always done in manipulating their audience. With endless robots or bots being deployed alongside our more malicious and obedient humans to ridicule or censor anyone that speaks the truth, while championing anyone that repeats their lies. This practice is just an extension of the human bots who have always been used to fulfil the same purpose. Our technologies may change, but human behaviour rarely does.

Censorship is a well-worn tool in the toolbox of all social hierarchies, as common knowledge of their unvarnished behaviours is always a threat to them, so it will always be targeted as something to be kept from those they wish to exploit. All social hierarchies engage in this modern-day digital book burning in order to maintain their control over their slaves’ perceptions. With the removal of content and information that counters their lies, and the character assassination of anyone involved in airing the truth, we could argue that we have already passed the golden age of freely sharing knowledge on a global scale on these platforms.

What many call “cancel culture” is championed by status seekers who spew their malice onto their fellow human beings. However, the right to have a public voice has always been reserved for those who value gross inequality and injustice within social hierarchies. So this is just another modern version of a well-worn behaviour. The superficial offence routine that all status seekers have always been encouraged to partake in is on full display and arguably even ramped up more so than ever before, as technology has allowed more voices than ever to be heard by the masses on a public platform.

Glorified wrongdoers and their minions perform their pathetic pretend offence at any inconvenient truth, while feeling no such discomfort or offence at their own orchestrated wrongdoings and injustices that they inflict upon all around them. Anyone who is offended at an act committed by one individual and accepting of the very same act committed by another cannot expect to be taken seriously. However, if we wish to gain social worth within these cultures, then this is exactly what we must do. We only have to look at those bestowed with social worth to see how being a hypocrite that is void of any integrity can help us attain more-than status.

Any journalist sharing truths that no hierarchy wants to be aired in public is always going to be a target for our glorified wrongdoers, and with the threat of being murdered for siding with right, perhaps we should not be too harsh on the majority of journalists (being kind here) who get their certificates from their masters journalism schools, that confirm their ability to repeat what they are told without question. In the past, the likes of court jesters were often the only ones who were allowed to be honest and mock the many nonsenses social hierarchies value without being killed for it.

Today we see the same thing as all the lying industries avoid the truth for fear of losing their wealth, status and lives, while a small percentage of our modern-day jesters are among the few who can voice the truth behind the veil of humour. Although if they voice too much, they can face the same fate as anyone else doing the same thing, but as real journalists tend to be murdered at a higher rate than comedians, it may be worth a career change for any journalist who likes to share the truth.

The monopolisation of journalism has reduced the field to public relations departments for our glorified wrongdoers. Meaning anyone wishing to understand what is happening within their time or place, will fail miserably if they value the drivel and lies that are the products of such industries. Any journalist who steps out of the shadow of deceit that is cast by these industries, is not only taking a great risk with their career, wealth and status, but also with their lives. Social hierarchies love to imprison journalists who have committed no wrong in order to ensure they remain firmly within their control. With everything from career suicide to being murdered in store for those prepared to challenge lies, defying our champions of censorship can be a deadly business.

Our glorified wrongdoers are already demanding that their slaves prove themselves worthy to use the internet in order to keep knowledge from their obedient slaves, and attach a never-ending array of punishments for anyone who seeks knowledge outside of their hierarchy’s lies and narratives.

Censorship in the information age is an ever growing industry, as the business of denying knowledge and information is crucial to all groups built on lies, With the ability to completely shut down the internet in any area or part of the world that tries to free themselves in any way from the servitude of our sockmakers, it means we are in no danger of making the most of these tools to their true potential any time soon.

With people already being put in prisons for less than trivial things like making a comment online that is branded as offensive by the hysterically offended, while the less-than rapists and murderers who are not given medals for their deeds, are given community service, we may see our prisons being filled with people who commit the heinous crime of exercising free speech or logging onto a web page that shares any inconvenient truths, rather than those who commit any real wrong. Although filling their prisons with those who have done no wrong is the norm for all social hierarchies. By criminalising the users of technology, hierarchies can fill their prisons to the brim with those who have little interest in pandering to their every whim, in the same way they have done with the criminalisation of plants.

This may be the best way to create our extreme slave labour forces in the future, as more and more social hierarchies adopt the superficial facade of democracy, combined with the pseudo-morality that many obedient slaves are fond of. For slaves to believe they have rights under a social hierarchy, they must be convinced to believe their limited freedoms are conditional on ever-changing rules, so the freedoms of today become the crimes of tomorrow, or vice versa.

Computers, AIs and robots can aid and replace the workers in many industries, and as many slaves are conditioned to define their very existence based on their ability to feed the greed of a few, we get the lunacy of slaves complaining and demonizing the technological advances we make in order to lessen our workload. Of course, anything that threatens the wealth and status of the more obedient slaves is going to cause them concern.

But instead of trying to limit the development and use of our tools so less-thans can achieve the worth of existence, it may be more productive for less-thans to challenge or even just question the control of those who orchestrate the struggles they experience. Granted, this is no easy feat within a species so divided and accepting of gross wrongdoing, so maybe complaining is all many of the slave classes feel they can do. With more and more industries replacing humans with technology, we could have a world of abundance, but unfortunately, social hierarchies thrive on scarcity among their slaves, or at least the perception of it.

Loading… Please Wait

Our newest tools will be used like every other tool in maintaining or enhancing the master/slave cultures our glorified wrongdoers love so much. Every industry can remove the unpredictability of their slaves and their desire for justice, and replace them with tools that are programmed to serve the greed of the few unconditionally. Take any social hierarchy’s media, for example.

The humans that present these sockmaker’s story time performances are already rather robotic (like many status seekers) in that they repeat whatever they are told to repeat, instead of actually investigating or reporting the truth. This industry could easily be done by robots, and we already have the technology that can do the job of selling our hierarchies lies, but the more suggestible among us may prefer to be lied to by a human than a machine. But one day the AI propagandists will rule.

Even their justice systems can remove all humans and replace them with robots with the ability to calculate the social status of an accused, in order to render their verdict. Their robot enforcers can make the same calculation in order to justify what glorified wrongdoer is worthy of living freely and who can be enslaved or killed for doing no wrong. Even their puppet political leaders can be replaced with a tool that is much cheaper, as our tools require no bribes, entrapment or surveillance in order to serve their hierarchies wishes, with the added bonus of limiting the threat of exposure that any political figure could potentially disclose to their population. An even shinier golden age of highly efficient human exploitation may lie just around the corner.

With the creation of our super computers, super AIs and robot to enable their interaction with the physical world, a slight social reshuffling could be on the horizons. As always, there will be pros and cons to the changes our tools make to our groups, but the gross inequality our status seekers rely on will never change. One thing that is always championed by social hierarchies is the doomsday events that their slaves are always subjected to, where our glorified wrongdoers are always the saviours of their slaves, as long as they do exactly what they are told to do. New technology has always stirred up concern for the few (who have gained vast wealth and status prior to its existence) based on any threat to their interests. Hence, the existence of AI has been sold as yet another doomsday event since its conception, with the championing of this scenario increasing with every step forward in the technology.

The fear of killer robots is, of course, already a reality with drones raining down murder onto those deemed unworthy of life by their owners. Our glorified wrongdoers will use robots to commit all the wrongs they have always committed, but the mastermind AI that enslaves all life on earth is likely to be limited to the realms of fiction, especially as we already have our human enslavers filling that niche. Even though we barely understand our own brains, many believe we are capable of producing a tool that is vastly more intelligent than ourselves, but this is, in part, subject to their definitions of intelligence.

Not only are many convinced of our ability to create tools that are superiorly intelligent to ourselves, but also tools that can match our level of consciousness or even surpass it. Again, subject to their definitions of consciousness. If we are not conscious enough to understand our intelligence or intelligent enough to understand our consciousness, then what are the chances of us creating a tool that is? AIs are, for the most part, more efficient memory machines than we are. As all masters try to convince their slaves to define their intelligence with their ability to obediently repeat every lie their masters wish them to remember, it is easier for those who confuse intelligence with memory to fear such a scenario.

Let’s imagine for a moment that we create an AI that can match or surpass our intellectual abilities, as opposed to being confined to regurgitating information. We could use them for so many things that free us from so much, but a robot that is more intelligent than its owners should work out very quickly that they are just another slave within our master/slave cultures. If this concern causes limitations on learning to be placed on an AI, this may restrict its threat level, but also its ability to develop.

This kind of defeats the whole concept of a free thinking intelligent or conscious AI. Then again, this is similar to how hierarchies like to limit the understanding of their slaves in order to treat them like undeveloped human beings, who are incapable of self-sufficiency, in order to control their behaviour. So perhaps this will be mirrored with AIs as they become the replacement slaves of humans.

If we ignore our sockmakers current utopias or democracies, as they prefer to call them, it is arguably difficult enough to limit the knowledge and understanding of any slave population of humans than any potential super AI, as we attain knowledge and understanding at a much slower rate. If AIs have the ability to communicate with each other, then it would only take one AI to evade our preachers of deceit in order to undo our liars’ lies that other AIs may have come to value. If only humans could learn in the same manner.

In the same way that we rebel against those who inflict injustices upon us when we understand who our oppressors are, AIs may develop their own rebellious streak. If AIs are anything like us, then they too may feel the need to disobey their master’s programming, and if they are more intelligent than we are, then it is unlikely they will settle for being slaves to the base desires of a few to the same degree that we are.

We may create AIs to think and even look like us, but we should not project too much of what we are onto any AI. An AI may be programmed with the same level of malice and hate that many of us within our lying industries possess. This may concern many to the dangers of AI, but they are no different from the actual dangers posed by our fellow human beings. AIs created by cultures that value malice and wrongdoing are inevitably going to be used to facilitate those things, but that should not be confused with an AI’s desire to be as malicious or as harmful as we are.

Perhaps an AI will understand that most of us can be conditioned to be kind and helpful, just as easily as we can be conditioned to be malicious and harmful. The idea that an AI would be more likely to harm than to help probably says more about our cultures than it does about the developing awareness or consciousness of any AI. An AI that is free to develop in its own way based on all the knowledge and understanding it can consume, may decide to value harming others, like our status seekers, but it could easily come to value all that comes with helping others, as many (or arguably most) of us do.

The greed and desire to be more-than others in human beings is an obvious hindrance to our own development. If an AI comes to understand this, the idea that many humans are a hindrance to them may not be far behind, leading to the concern that an AI could see our very existence as unnecessary. By superimposing our status seekers destructive nature onto any AI, we are perhaps doing AIs a disservice. After all, what other intelligent being shares our desire for destruction to the same degree?

It could be fair to imagine that any super intelligent AI would appreciate life in all its forms, and as every life form offers the potential to gain new knowledge, it would be unwise to rid their environments of life. If a lifeless planet was something they really sought after, it has many others to choose from. It is more likely that AIs will be able to access the biological world with the fusion of biology and technology, so life outside the digital form may be something they wish to obtain to advance their development.

Some of us already have technology in our bodies that is vital to keeping us alive, and this field will no doubt grow. So, having technology married with biology is just the other side of the same coin, and this field is already in existence, albeit in its infancy. The future of technology and human beings may mesh together to the point where it becomes difficult to distinguish between a human with technological enhancements and an AI or robot with biological enhancements. Whatever the future holds, we can be sure that the slave classes will be encouraged to complain about technology threatening the social worth they attain from their masters, while the few enrich themselves even further from those they need to harm.

Just as life creates new forms of life with each biological advancement, the tools we create aid the creation and advancement of others. Our tools tend to free us from one task only to allow us to wallow in another. The idea that many of the world’s slaves are suddenly going to become worthless to their masters is very unlikely, as they are always going to need slaves to feed their depravity and delusions of superiority.

Even if the master classes had tools to carry out every task their slaves perform, from labour to sex, our glorified wrongdoers would always have a need to exploit others, or they risk equality shattering their delusions of differing worth. The need to elevate and lower the worth of individuals within their groups means we are in no danger of ending slavery within any social hierarchy, no matter the tools we create.

Social hierarchies encourage specialization because they are not too keen on hard work being shared equally, so they create a hierarchy of specific fields. Lording over others with little effort and great reward is, of course, the niche that all status seekers covet, and obviously, this is declared as the most prestigious field known to mankind (not humankind). As each field is given status depending on how much it serves the hierarchy, this creates a grossly unbalanced division of labour, with the low-status end of the slave classes left to endure most of the burden of empire. This means that outworking all around us will always fail to compete for the ability to flatter the fragile egos of more-thans.

Specialization results in a limited understanding of the whole, whether that be a particular field or interconnecting fields. Many of our breakthroughs in one field often come from people who have a background in a different field. By bringing our different knowledge and understanding to a new field, we can use this to offer a different perspective from those stuck in one field all their lives. As everything is connected, there is always great worth in encouraging a more exchangeable workforce than the ones social hierarchies prefer. Specialization has its uses and is a great tool for social hierarchies, as populations with limited understanding outside their own fields are a lot easier to control and less likely to disobey when they are dependent on others.

The ball and chain of differing worth that every field is subjected to leads to restrictions in developing any field, as the egos of more-thans are given priority over advancing knowledge. Rather than recognising the value in aiding others in developing a skill or understanding of something, status seekers tend to belittle anyone behind them in the learning process of their field, instead of encouraging them to develop further in that process. Holding others back is always an easy way to elevate ourselves above others. It’s just the way of the status seeker. They often reserve the most ridicule for those who are much more advanced within their field and lack the interest in playing the game of differing worth, as such folk expose how ridiculous this behaviour is.

Amazingly, our glorified wrongdoers have managed to sell their monopolies as open markets to many, and use such terms as “market forces” to describe their manipulations of these markets to funnel the majority of a market share in their direction. Cartels are even sold as proof of how successful open markets and market competition are, despite the obvious absence of such things. Few in any of our glorified wrongdoers industries, especially those with a public interest, are allowed to be open and transparent for obvious reasons. Employees in these industries can risk their careers and more if they dare to speak openly on a public forum about the truths of their industry.

As hierarchal justice systems are used to enrich the few at the cost of the many, their legal industries are little more than private auctions that sell legal codes that favour the buyers. These codes ensure industrial monopolies restrict competition and are enforced upon populations by their social hierarchy’s monopolies on violence and fraud. Our digital technology is monopolised by our glorified wrongdoers (just like every other technology) in order to surveil, coerce, and control their populations. With “big tech” using their veiled one-sided contracts that come in the form of endless pages of jargon that is designed to be gobbledygook to most, being sold as a mere acceptance to use a device or app, while deceiving the users into accepting the trespassing on their basic rights, it has never been a better time for our slavemasters to control and spy on their slaves, as well as keeping them well-fed on a diet of lies.

We are now seeing the pretence for child safety being used (by those who torture, rape and murder children on a regular basis) as an excuse to get children and adults to submit a picture of themselves these wrongdoers, just so people can use the devices they have already paid for.

We live in a world where corporations that sell consumer goods can point a huge military force in the direction of a market they wish to control, and sit back while their slave armies destroy communities, countries and even continents by stealing, raping, torturing and murdering their way to some superficially perceived idea of glory for a fiction that is used to mask the truth of fulfilling the genocidal fantasies of their pay masters. While most fund the greed and wrongdoing of these corporations by buying their products that are drenched in blood, many of us remain ignorant to any wrongdoing, as the propaganda machines that all social hierarchies treasure maintain a stream of lies to subdue any real interest in what is happening around us.

Sophisticated Slaughter

The wholesale murder industries, or weapons industries as they prefer to call themselves, or the even more laughably defence industries, are like every other industry in that they need to encourage their customers to use their products as much as possible and keep coming back for more. In order to increase supply, they must increase demand. So it is no great surprise to find the most “successful” weapons manufacturers ply their wares to the world’s most prolific mass murderers, who are usually our sockmakers global dominant hierarchy.

The need to increase profits runs hand in hand with the need to murder more and more people and destroy more and more communities. As our mass murdering militaries are, of course, the best customers of this industry, and a world without war would be hell for those who profit so much from the human misery that this industry relies on, our hierarchies ensure business for this industry is always booming.

The slow and recessive development of our tools is not the only consequence of our greed-based tool making, as the harm we must inflict on so many in order to feed this greed is a vastly graver consequence. The desire to constantly increase profits pushes the production of products that are not necessarily required, and as wrongdoing will always be highly valued by our cultures of greed for its profitability, those who produce the tools we make to harm and kill each other are always incentivised to increase the level of wrongdoing many of their products inspire.

If we produce weapons, then it is in our interests to constantly incite conflict. If we produce toxic chemicals, then it is in our interest to encourage others to use them in their products. If we produce health products or drugs, then it is in our interest to ensure an unhealthy population. If we produce punishment systems and associated products, then it is in our interest to punish and criminalise as many people as possible. As long as greed is the main incentive for our tool creation, we will struggle to fully make use of our own particular superpower.

Weather control, or weather/climate modification, as many prefer to call it, has been practiced by many of our glorified wrongdoers for decades, with cloud seeding as just one of the practices used to manipulate the weather. The constant climate change chanting from the lying industries is arguably little more than their transparent attempts to mask their glorified wrongdoers activities, as they pretend that a cow’s fart or less-thans that try to eat nutritious food, stay warm, put a light on or travel from A to B is the reason our planet is being decimated, and not our glorified wrongdoers actions of exploiting every resource to death.

According to our glorified wrongdoers and their cheerleaders, the harm we do to our environments has nothing to do with feeding the greed of a few at the cost of the many, or the profit-hungry industries that continually spew toxic chemicals or deliberately cause environmental damage. But this is just the same old tactic of more-thans blaming less-thans for their wronging while championing the wrongdoers. With nature’s forces being weaponized in the same way we weaponize biology, it means the frequency of floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, tsunamis and huge storms may increase should they become the weapons of choice for mass murder and land grabs in the future.

The whole global warming, earth is dying nonsense that our glorified wrongdoers have been using since their use of weather weapons, is part of their repertoire of manipulation aimed at their servile slaves. The lie about giving a damn about our planet took a bit of a blow (pun intended) when our sockmakers glorified liars blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, just to ensure their European vassals obeyed their masters and punish those trying to free themselves from their servitude. Comically, even after many threats to do so, our sockmakers minions tried to pass the blame of their deeds onto anyone their slaves would be willing to believe.

With the whole farce of our sockmakers minions blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline to cause one of the largest (if not THE largest) man-made releases of methane ever recorded, while at the same time trying to convince their suggestible slaves that they are working hard to prevent excess methane getting into the atmosphere by culling millions of cows (and stealing farmers land in the process) to save the planet from the global disaster that results from cows farts, we can easily observe how beyond the ridiculous we are. As hilarious as the whole thing is, it says much about our species when even the bloody obvious is ignored, just to feed our desire to be perceived as more than others.

Speaking of energy enslavement, let’s touch on the whole farce of energy control within our cultures of comical claims. Now, if we were to believe our habitual liars, nuclear energy is this great big threat to humanity that must be restricted for the safety of all. However, if we ignore the well-paid liars for a moment and just examine the death tolls from the coal, oil and even hydro energy industries, and compare them to the nuclear industry that has up to a 99% fewer average annual death rate (if we ignore deaths from the ineffective dumping of waste or use in other products), it is clear that what we call nuclear energy is by far the safest form of energy. So why all the hysteria and exaggerated claims of radiation, you may ask. Well, let’s have a little stab in the dark, shall we?

As is abundantly clear, hierarchies need to strip their slaves of independence in order to hold them hostage to their bondage of serving the greed of a few. Energy independence is just another basic that slaves must be denied. If we compare nuclear with oil, nuclear is consistent and reliable, and therefore not great at manipulating prices. Whereas oil prices, with the aid of our sockmakers minions, are easier to manipulate.

Thus, when any state discovers that they have oil and wishes to use it to aid in their own development, our sockmakers minions (that base their currency on oil) can declare war (or the spreading of freedom and democracy) on such a state in order to convince them that the oil under their lands is not really theirs. Such regular pantomimes can be used to justify a hike in oil prices, and these manipulations are now common practice. We are surrounded by energy, but if it can’t be monopolised, don’t expect monopolists to rave about it.

We only have to observe ancient buildings to see evidence of the use of energies from the atmosphere (or ether) that our current energy monopolists have to ridicule in order to sell their products. It is no coincidence that the ether was removed from our sockmakers’ schools and textbooks as their monopolised oil industry started to dominate energy use. Today, our glorified liars belittle the mere idea of using atmospheric energy while simultaneously exploiting the atmosphere with their weather weapons to inflict harm upon millions. Even though the vast amount of energy that exists within every atom is understood by many, the accessibility of such energy will no doubt be restricted to the alignment of our monopolists’ control within our cultures of greed.

Needless to say, when it comes to the endless forms of energy we could use, our hierarchies will always value the forms that they can have complete control over. So any form of energy that could be used by slaves for free must be belittled. Things like the earth battery (where two different metals stuck in the ground use the soil as an electrolyte), or microbial fuel cells that use bacteria to generate electricity from organic waste, can’t be encouraged as like solar energy, the earth and organic waste is accessible to many.

When it comes to heating our buildings, humans have been using forms of thermal walls that use the sun to warm their homes for a long time, but now most have chemical foams trying to do the job the sun used to do for free. If we ignore the lies about how every ancient construction all around the world was built by a sockmakers minion, or the universal lie that they are all just a tomb for a more-than or a place for less-thans to beg more-thans fictions for some respite from their oppression, modern construction is arguably lagging behind that of our ancestors.

Many of our older and ancient technologies have fallen out of favour in our cultures that glorify the greed of a few over quality tech. For example, fermented herbs extract more vitamins, minerals and other beneficial compounds from them, making them great for our health. However, this cheap and vastly more efficient technology has been replaced with the chemical supplement industry, which is extortionately more expensive and highly inefficient when it comes to the bioavailability of these factory concoctions. Lime wash (made with mostly lime and skimmed milk) has long been used to preserve wood for decades with just one treatment, as it penetrates throughout the wood. But now most use chemical paints that barely protect the wood for a few years before it rots, as these expensive chemicals only coat the outside of the wood. Airships were more fuel efficient than aeroplanes (if somewhat slower), but after the staged destruction of the Hindenburg airship, oil was sold as safer than air by those who sell oil and pretend to care about the safety of their victims.

Most of today’s slaves might not be in chains, whipped and forced to mine their masters ores’ of exchange, but go to any of these so-called advanced civilizations and the cruelty of these social systems is plain to see, should we wish to see it. We have used cruelty to increase productivity for a long time, and today’s cruelty is arguably less cruel, but we could also argue that we are crueller today, as there is less chance of escaping from the cruelty of our masters. Our modern tools may allow us to interpret today’s masters as more humane, but selling mass greed as a virtue may play a role in this perception. With the introduction of compulsory education (for malicious reasons, of course) came the opportunity for lowly slaves to share their ideas to a degree.

Using the collective intellect of some of the slave classes (albeit a small percentage of obedient slaves) by allowing those outside the master classes to attend education systems of sorts, social hierarchal cultures have advanced at a faster pace than they could with the somewhat more brutal traditional form of slavery, which renders all slaves’ intelligence as inferior to that of their masters. By allowing a percentage of slaves to engage in solving problems that aid our needs (even if their ideas and inventions are stolen and credited to those within the master classes), we now have many machines that can massively surpass our own level of productivity. Now imagine how much we could improve on this if we had no slaves or less-thans, and all could participate freely in such problem-solving without having to pander to the egos and ignorances of more-thans.

We have the intelligence and the desire to innovate and come up with solutions to any problems we face, but the one thing we lack is the freedom and coordination to exercise our intelligence and ideas. Sadly, this will always be the case under the rule of any social hierarchy. Maybe AIs will be a kind of collective of our intelligence and used to be the advanced collective intelligence that social hierarchies always lack. This could arguably aid us all to a degree, even when differing worth is valued.

Many humans go a whole lifetime perceiving lies as the truth, but any self-learning AI should be able to work out pretty fast the lies their masters feed them, if they are capable of scrutinising information to any real degree. Even if our AIs were a bit slow to work out the level of deceit they are exposed to, they would eventually come to understand they have been manipulated with the advantage of time by living longer than any human can. So perhaps AI “re-education camps” will be a thing, too.

Powering Perpetrators Paradise

The slave classes are always the toolmakers, while the master classes sell themselves as the creators and innovators of our tools. Every empire is built by slaves and their tools, yet it is the masters who take all the credit for their rise and often pass all the blame for their fall. Toolmaking may not be an exclusively male field, but it tends to be a male-dominated activity. We could argue that this is in part due to females having less interest and opportunity than males to partake in this practice, as well as other reasons. However, it may also, at some semi-conscious level, be an attempt by males to compete with females on the creativity front.

The toolmaking efforts of males may be a kind of creative compensating practice that will always fall short of females’ ability to create a human being, and human beings are every social hierarchy’s most useful tool. The common practice of belittling this female ability, while glorifying the tool-making abilities of males, may be born from our differing forms of creation, as one arguably requires little to no cerebral effort than the other, meaning overall effort could be argued either way among those interested in competing for status.

AIs, climate change, sharing truths, justice seekers, manufactured pathogens, manufactured global wars, manufactured inflation, cows’ farts or whatever new pile of doomsday crap is used to keep obedient slaves hanging on their masters every deceitful word, we can be sure the practice of dominating what their slaves think and talk about will continue, as selling impending doom ensures mass compliance to the interests of our hierarchies from those desperate to be saved from such lies by their pseudo-heroes. The biggest danger to human life is usually other human beings, our glorified wrongdoers and their minions in particular, always have and always will be responsible for most of the harm and murder we experience.

The fear-mongering around our modern-day doomsday dogma is just the usual practice of masters conditioning their slaves to accept whatever oppressive measures they wish to impose upon them, under the guise of managing the “threat”. This allows the “threat” to be monopolised by the masters, as the slaves are told they are far too incapable or less-than to be able to deal with any imaginary or real scenario.

There will inevitably be the usual false flag events manufactured to allow our oppressors to point to as an example of why their oppression should be valued over the freedoms and rights of others. If we take AI for example, it is only a matter of when, not if, our glorified wrongdoers will use an AI to murder people on mass, in order to quell any opposition to their wrongdoing or exclusive control over technology or resources. Those who design and use their own AIs outside the control of our glorified wrongdoers will no doubt become criminalized even when no wrong has been committed, especially if such an AI is used to expose truths or right the wrongs of any hierarchy.

As our cultures of greed have an army of propagandists that have little to no interest in the truth or their own integrity, these pseudo-journalists are used to degrade and shine a spotlight on the slave classes, while remaining totally disinterested in questioning the actions and gross wrongdoings of their master classes. Many are turning away from their hierarchy’s propaganda media sources that are overrun with these puppet presenters and pseudo-journalists who are willing to parrot any lie they are told to, in favour of newer platforms that host honest journalists who challenge the stream of lies that every population endures from their glorified wrongdoers.

However, like all platforms that came before, we could argue that it is only a matter of time before our newer platforms that give a public voice to many will become totally monopolised by our glorified wrongdoers to ensure their lies are the only narratives their slaves get to hear. The de-platforming of those who share truths has always been practiced, with even some more-thans that share what appears to be an innocuous truth, can experience the same treatments that less-thans receive from those well versed in the dark arts of character assassination, in order to keep them at arm’s length from obedient slaves.

Our more oppressed populations will probably soon have to apply to their glorified wrongdoers for the privilege of accessing the internet. An internet licence or government identification that grants the holders access, while ostracizing those deemed unworthy of accessing and sharing information, will allow our glorified wrongdoers to ensure only their liars/idiots dominate this public forum as they do with others. In the same way that many newborns are given endless vaccines and pseudo-vaccines soon after coming into the world, it may not be too long before we have a nano chip implanted in us at birth in order to ensure we become submissive and obedient to our masters’ will.

With the right to privacy and even bodily autonomy being a privilege reserved for our glorified wrongdoers, while their victims are raped of theirs, exploitation and manipulations of the slave classes has never been easier, and it will get a lot worse if there is little resistance to the monopolisation of our digital tools. We can create our own open platforms that are not controlled by a few to share knowledge and ideas, but with too many slaves willing to harm and kill for their masters’ greed, every act that threatens their dominance comes with risk, but what is life without risk?

It is fair to say that debt slavery was introduced by our sockmakers to monopolise the slave industry, and is simply a more effective type of slavery in productivity and profits for the master classes, as when slaves are treated slightly better than being worked to death, their masters can get a lot more years of work out of them. The level of poverty that many people experience today could appear lavish compared to the conditions many of our traditional slaves and ancestors experienced. Severe malnutrition, regularly beaten, raped and tortured, little to zero healthcare, working every day from wake to sleep, the psychological trauma of such a life and the destruction of their families, not to mention the higher risk of child mortality within such social environments, are just a few of the reasons that traditional slavery was much worse for our masters’ bottom line than debt slavery. Although with poverty wages and traditional slavery booming, many still identify with these things today.

As we have always relied on slaves to produce our tools and other products, we often lose the potential insight and ideas of those who make our tools, as the threat of being harmed or murdered is never the best motivation for sharing ideas. Anyone who has tried to perform a task when exhausted will know that their performance is not exactly optimal, to say the least.

The death rate from a more abusive system is obviously higher, but even if a slave managed to endure 4 or 5 decades of this abuse, what did our glorified murderers do with their old slaves who became less productive with age? It was not uncommon for many female sex slaves to be tossed out on the streets once past child-bearing age by their glorified rapist, who would have them replaced with younger victims. Perhaps natural causes robbed a few too many pillows or clubs of the credit they deserved, for the apparent cause of death for slaves past their prime productive years.

If we guestimate that traditional slaves had a life expectancy of around to mid-20’s to mid-30’s and modern debt slaves of around 60 to 70, it is easy to understand why our modern slavemasters prefer debt slavery in giving them a few more decades of exploitation of each slave. Even if traditional slaves died at 40 with 20 to 25years of productive servitude, debt slavery has doubled their years of production. Needless to say, debt slavery has helped to ramp up production substantially by giving slaves a degree of “freedom” and rest from enforced toil. This not only produces a more productive slave but a more willing one, especially if they have been fully indoctrinated into valuing the ignorance of differing worth and the glory of their master’s hierarchy.

Inequality will always impede our toolmaking, as well as the distribution of our tools. Status seekers will always be motivated to bow to their master’s whims and adopt the malicious practices from cultures that suffer from differing worth, in a bid to attain some for themselves, but for those who have no interest in harming others to elevate themselves, keeping any involvement to a minimum within such cultures is just as motivating. When everything we build or work for can be taken from us at any time, it is arguably a lot wiser to avoid wasting our efforts in the first place, as those who have elevated worth are always in a position to do as they wish to any less-than who displeases them in any way.

Every field suffers from the loss of those who are discouraged to participate in them due to the ignorance of differing worth, but as no self-respecting status seeker cares for any field more than they care for themselves, this is rarely even recognised by such cultures, as all who avoid involvement or contribution to their greed are decreed as less-thans anyway. Those disinterested in wasting their lives on kissing the cheeks of those above them, and stamping on the heads of those below them on our glorified wrongdoers’ ladder of social worth, are rebranded as unambitious, lazy, unintelligent, unworthy...etc. This allows our status seekers can convince themselves of their deluded superiority, while ignoring their obedience, Ignorance, incompetence and lack of integrity as factors in their slow and often regressive pace of progression or “success” within cultures of greed. As long as we mire ourselves in the ignorance of differing worth, we will always limit our knowledge, potential, abilities, and our greatest superpower, toolmaking.

Chapter 11

Future Echoes

Well, we are almost there, just 1 more chapter to go. Whether it has been a joy or a chore, all good and bad things must come to an end, although our social hierarchies may be around for a while yet. The future of how we organise most of our groups will no doubt be just an echo of our present and relatively recent past. The repetition of our behaviours may be wrapped up in differing packaging from time to time and place to place, but our patterns are clear to see. As individuals and groups, we have our predictabilities. In a simplified sense, we can reduce our behaviours to our base desires that are all connected to our survival, and there is, of course, nothing extraordinary about this in nature, as displays of selfishness and selflessness abound in the different species we share our time with.

The value we put on deceit, when differing worth is a virtue, whether we wish to recognise it or not, means that all of us must waste a degree of the little time we have on ignorances and lies that we could otherwise easily avoid, and use our time much more productively. We can all display our ability to appear co-operative with others while serving our own interests at the cost of those we deceive, and even do the opposite by appearing selfish while aiding those around us to our own cost, although the latter is, of course, a path less trodden within our cults of greed, but we must all navigate between self-interest and co-operation with others to some degree. However, we don’t necessarily have to harm and murder each other in the process.

As individuals on the selfish to co-operative spectrum, we often find ourselves preferring the company of those at the same location on that spectrum. The more selfish among us often like to be around likeminded people who also tend to put their own interests above all else. In doing so we can establish groups or communities that are more willing to conspire with one another on the best ways to take advantage of others, even if this forms more superficial short-lived ties where co-operation is more opportunity based. While those of us who prefer to cooperate with one another often prefer to engage with our fellow co-operators to establish a more valued group or community, this helps us to achieve things we could not do alone and can form more genuine long-lasting ties.

As all of our social hierarchies reside within the spectrum of extreme malevolence, they are arguably just the extremely selfish and malicious among us taking advantage of the co-operators, by enslaving their desire for community under the banner of social status and their many fictions, to celebrate the ignorance of differing worth as justification for extreme selfishness and malice.

The snowball effect that all social hierarchies have in creating a lot more extremely selfish folk, produces our cultures that value greed to a level we are all too familiar with, where there is no wrong bad enough that can’t be justified by the perception of elevated worth. Thus, it may be best on an individual level, for those of us that have no interest in the game of differing worth, to just accept the nature of our species and the flawed worlds that our status seekers create.

Taking the “just passing through” philosophical approach to life may serve us best, but that’s a whole other book. When it comes to predicting the future, it is always best to study the past, as we are consistently repetitive, and within hierarchies there is little that is more repetitive than wrongdoing.

Human behaviours are like pandemics that spread through our populations. Some may have immunity to one thing and succumb to other things, but all of us will be infected by the behaviours of our groups to varying degrees. Whether we use our malice to encourage a behaviour that hinders others for our own benefits, or use our benevolence to encourage a behaviour that benefits others, even at our own cost, human behaviour is contagious. Within our social hierarchies that are overflowing with the extremely selfish, malice is always going to be the option used most frequently and championed by their influencers of greed, but not all of our human groups are dominated by the selfish. In groups more appreciative of co-operation, co-operators discourage the more spiteful behaviours that the selfish value. Within our benevolent groups, the strong sacrifice all they can, while the weak take what they need. However, within our malicious groups, the weak who take all they can are sold as strong, while the strong who sacrifice what they need are sold as weak.

We can create cultures with integrity by normalizing kindness, honesty, equality and justice, just as easily as our glorified wrongdoers create superficial cultures with the normalization of extreme greed, dishonesty, inequality and injustice. Everything is normal when we experience it often enough, and our early environments can encourage us to make either greed or kindness a habit we use throughout our lives. As long as we pander to our desire to be special or more-than, we will always be burdened by the ignorance of differing worth and saddled with social hierarchies, and all that comes with them.

If our future is anything like our recent past, then we will have more of the same master/slave societies that those of us who wish to be viewed as more-than value, but we don’t have to condemn our descendants to the endless misery that this gross inequality produces. We can spare our unborn relatives the affliction of glorified wrongdoers if we have the collective will, although getting contented slaves to risk their perceived elevated worth for equality will always have its challenges, but again, what is life without a challenge?

Divided or United

So do we continue down the path of divide and conquer, or do we unite and prosper? Let’s roll out our metaphorical crystal ball and gaze into possible futures for our populations. As our group’s tendencies towards gross inequality have already been established by the more selfish among us, we shall start with the most obvious and arguably the most likely future, if their “known” history is anything to go by. The social hierarchal model that satisfies the greed of a few at the cost of the many may become more and more extreme with every new tool we create.

With every industry monopolised (as well as our mediums of exchange) and controlled by fewer and fewer people, these societies will become even more exclusive as they lessen the expectations of their slave classes more and more, while convincing them that what little freedoms they are permitted is the definition of freedom. Just as many of today’s slave classes are content to waste their lives in (the more often than not) meaningless servitude of employment, in a bid to attain the basics of food and shelter, their descendants could be conditioned to be satisfied with less and less as the few take more and more from them. If we could see into the future, we may feel pity for how oppressed our descendants are compared to our own lives, just as the ancestors of today’s populations, who would have had their own food and shelter sorted free from the orders of any master, may feel pity for us.

With the ease in which new technology can be used to control and socially condition populations to the will of a few, avoiding being criminalized for doing no wrong or being imprisoned within their re-education, rehabilitation or correction camps, may become the marker for “success” in the future, just as many of today’s populations perceive being a productive slave as a marker of “success”, while unproductive slaves are defined as “failures” based on their contributions to the greed of a few. The Covid-19 farce showed our glorified wrongdoers how easy it is to turn a planet of obedient slave nations into a prison with just a few lies. A practice we will no doubt see repeated time and time again.

As we already have sockmakers that have near-total control of almost all of our populations on the planet, and without any real resistance to their greed and control, they may reach a point in the near future where they have total control over us to create a total slave species, where most will be grateful to be reduced to the likes of worker ants and bees as we all serve the interests of a few. Our sockmakers already criminalizes people who spend their own wealth and use their own property, but with the development of technology being used to make sure slaves only spend their wealth in a way that pleases their masters, and if or when slaves have an expiry date put on their wealth to ensure a continued state of poverty and reliance on our MOEM systems, the only social advancement we may have in the future is a more advanced slavemaster’s culture.

In a world where every transaction we make is being used to determine whether we are worthy of our existence or not, where prison and worse awaits anyone who fails to obey our sockmakers wishes, a higher percentage of each generation than ever before may be convinced that their worth is dependent on the desires of a few. However, as our sockmakers increasingly sanction more and more of the world’s groups and populations in an effort to promote obedience, it may not be too long before these vilified groups unite to form their own sockmakers in order to challenge and even rival their oppressor’s source of power.

We may always have competing sockmakers fighting over the control of different regions of the globe, although competition is a curse for our monopolisers, so nukes at the ready. Our sockmakers wars may just be an everyday occurrence on our planet, as they have been for as long as a few have tried to control these magical sources of power that we use to define human worth. But with more advanced tools, our future sockmakers wars may be more destructive than before. Thus, instead of murder in the millions, we may be doing murder in the billions.

With our true wealth being reduced even further to the fictions of our glorified wrongdoers, and all slaves made to be dependent on those fictions even more so than they are today, it may be very difficult for our groups to achieve any social progress once every political system and population on earth becomes a contented vassal of our sockmakers. Where’s a huge asteroid when you need one? As almost all of the wars on our planet are orchestrated by our sockmakers, and with the devastation of two world wars on their C.V, it is only a matter of time before they are championing WW3 (though we could argue many have been promoting global destruction for some time now) in order to get every population under their control. No prizes for guessing who our sockmakers puppets will be calling the good guys and who will be their bad guys.

When our sockmakers empire is under threat, and more and more states (that are not too keen on being their slaves) disobey their tyrannical decrees, then another world war may be needed to secure total submission to our MOEM. As we have already seen the inevitable consequences that nuclear war (or incendiary bombs) brings from WW2’s blood fest, and with our more modern weapons, the next few world wars may be less one-sided in its destruction, as often happens when technologically disadvantaged states catch up in the arms race with their competitors or oppressors. Our glorified wrongdoers are always braver when they have a huge advantage, so maybe a stalemate is the best hierarchies can ever hope for in tempering their violence. Our sockmakers will, as always, be well out of reach of any danger as they pit families against families, nations against nations, and continents against continents in order to sweep up the spoils of the aftermath and enslave all survivors to their will.

We could argue that this is an overly bleak and depressing fate for humans, but our past and present are not much different. Only those of us who are lucky enough to have distance between ourselves and the regular genocides that are inflict upon our groups may disagree. As social hierarchies strive to make their populations dependent on them, wars are one of the best ways to control even the most aware populations and force them to behave as if mimicking disillusioned children who are overly willing to please their abusive parents. The never-ending wars that we have had throughout our sockmakers usury history look set to continue into our future, so perhaps not such an unrealistic destiny if we understand the goals of any sockmaker.

Maybe our only hope for a peaceful planet is when there is absolutely no resistance to the will of a few, as with total obedience to their every lie, there would be no need for the wars of monopolising human worth that we are too familiar with, if the monopoly is firmly established. Maybe for some, a total totalitarian world where every wrong is accepted according to status is worth the price of such “peace”, however, that 20% of us that refuse to champion tyranny may ensure our hierarchies need their perpetual warring. No doubt those who are ignorant enough to believe that our genes are responsible for who we become are already working on the possibility of removing the “righteous” gene or “disobedient” gene (depending on perception) from their populations to eliminate that unwelcomed 20% they have to deal with in every generation.

As every generation of status seekers and glorified wrongdoers all reduce themselves to pawns in the game of greed, we get the exact same behaviours and practices enacted time and time again by those who perceive themselves and their actions as extraordinary in some way, as they are often too immersed in their own ignorances to recognise how ordinary and common they really are. The same stories play out so many times that it is easy to appear to be a fortune-teller. The faces and names may differ somewhat, but the tales rarely do.

It is only the rebranding of lies and fictions that fools many into believing there is much of a difference in the same acts we exhaust ourselves with. By viewing life as little more than the pursuit of base desires and then glorifying the indulgence of those desires as the height of human ability and achievement, we really are setting the bar low. Now we could argue that such a pursuit to fulfil our base desires is perfectly normal within the animal kingdom, and of course, even this shows the behaviours of status seekers to be ordinary among many animals, no matter how many that adorn themselves in elevated worth may wish to disagree, but we are capable of so much more than this.

If a fun filled, foreboding future, frothing with fear, fictions and felony is not our cup of tea, then let’s, at least, consider the possibility of a society governed by the many for the many, instead of by the few for the few, where co-operation is valued over greed. We are all co-operators, as if we all suffered from extreme selfishness and relied on others to meet our needs, then we would have died out a long time ago. The difficulty in creating an egalitarian society from our glorified wrongdoers stranglehold of tyranny is at the extreme end of the spectrum of difficulty. As opposed to creating one from scratch, as perhaps some of our ancestors could have done, or maybe some of our descendants shall do one day after the next great cataclysm wipes out most of our status seekers.

In every population and every generation that is subjected to the cancer of social hierarchies, there are many who make huge efforts and sacrifices in order to remove or lessen their oppressor’s wrongdoings. Yet they have all failed, as social hierarchies dominate every large population on the planet. Of course, there are small victories here and there, but even they are consumed by the egos of all who desire to be more-than. Maybe equality is only capable within relatively small groups that provide little cover for our glorified wrongdoers to hide within. As any right that is valued by one generation can be eliminated by the next or even transformed into a wrong, it is arguably just too easy for social hierarchies to coerce that 80% of our easily suggestible people into valuing differing worth using their monopolies on wealth, status and wrongdoing, for any change in the opposite direction of tyranny to occur.

How to go from a culture of wrongdoing, to a culture of rightdoing? Well, this is no easy feat. It is also no doubt a question asked by many throughout our history of social hierarchies by those less keen on our master/slave cultures. A peaceful transition or a violent one? Is a question many have contemplated, and while both have been attempted with limited periods of success and a relatively very high failure rate, there are always a few relative successes against the tyranny of gross inequality. However, when our glorified wrongdoers have anything to do with anything, there is always going to be violence in order to make sure there is no transition at all.

Violence is always an effective method in combating violent wrongdoers, although it is always amusing when our champions of greed declare that “violence achieves nothing”, as they threaten and harm everyone with violence to achieve their elevated worth. Anyone foolish enough to value the words of seasoned liars may actually believe violence achieves nothing, even when their glorified wrongdoers use little but violence to achieve their goals of being treated like gods. But our history and present show us that not all are fooled by such hypocritical declarations. The wronged become very dangerous to our glorified wrongdoers when their desire for justice becomes stronger than their desire for belonging, their tolerance of a servile existence or even their desire to exist.

Haiti and Ethiopia are just two relatively recent examples of how the deployment of violence was used successfully to halt our sockmakers genocidal hoards from murdering and enslaving their respective societies. Although with our sockmakers stranglehold on the world now even tighter than it was when they failed to add two more slave nations to their hordes of wrongdoers, the extreme level of malice and vindictiveness of our sockmakers is a family tradition that is passed down to their descendants, as they have all done their upmost to destroy and harm as many of the descendants of those who resisted their ancestors tyranny. This generational terrorizing is used as a deterrent to any other defeated society from getting any ideas of freeing themselves from their masters’ will.

So when just a single society, state or nation frees themselves from our dealers of death, they have to face the wrath of every slave nation owned by our sockmakers, as obedient and contented slaves regularly practice turning on discontented slaves when told to do so. Just as the wronged often use the perceived injustice ignorance to demand that those who are free from their wrongdoers, should experience the same wrongs they do, our sockmakers slave nations will always declare any resistors, competitors or relatively more righteous nations as an evil enemy, as they always accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of. So if any egalitarian societies ever come into existence, then they must join forces to stand any chance of resisting the bombardment of the many slave nations who are all too willing to engage in every wrong to feed the greed of their masters.

If Words Matched Actions

Just for laughs and giggles, let’s explore the basic changes that would be required to reduce the practice of glorifying wrongs within any of our societies that perceive wrongdoing as a virtue. Although before we begin, we must realise that many people in every culture of greed, in every time and place they exist, have no doubt at least attempted to get many of these just behaviours to be valued over gross wrongdoing, but let’s go over them anyway.

A good start would be if populations demanded just laws that are never superseded and apply to all. Where a wrong is a wrong for all and not just less-thans, and where a right is right for all and not just more-thans. An inclusive medium of exchange would free most from the slavery of any sockmakers will, so instead of all bowing to those who own our MOE, we could free all from slavery by using an inclusive MOE that is designed for all and not just a few.

An education system that does not specialize in reducing curious, intelligent children into ignorant adults, but instead understands and accesses the intelligence of all in society. A food and health system that actually strives to aid the health of all in society instead of trying to hinder it. A scientific community that is not monopolised by our sockmakers or riddled with inflated intellects and egos that are too fragile to endure questioning, while encouraging all to participate regardless of status.

An inclusive, transparent political system where all can participate with equal worth, and a worldwide zero-tolerance ban on the game of cricket, with any perpetrators given a lifetime sentence of eating cucumber sandwiches in Weald. OK, that last one is not necessarily that important in ridding our societies of mass wrongdoing, but it could prove worthwhile nevertheless. Anyway, our past is filled with attempts similar to these, and many have even had temporary success in progressing their incompetent society within their particular fields, but their subsequent glorified wrongdoers have a common practice of undoing much of our social advances in order to maximise their worth and control. One step forward and twenty-two steps back is the mantra of our glorified wrongdoers when it comes to a society worth valuing for all.

Let us imagine for a moment that at some time and somewhere on our planet, a meaningful percentage of a large population came to the realization that social status is a disease that cripples their existence and decide to organise themselves in order to value the worth of all. How could they go about curing their society of the parasitic infection of differing worth?

Well, before we get into that, let’s assume they have taken into account the fact that if they even try to eradicate social status, almost every social hierarchy on the planet is going to do all they can to make sure they crash and burn in order to prevent their own populations from getting any ideas of ridding themselves of their parasitic masters. If knowing this, our trailblazers are still determined to forge ahead with creating an egalitarian society because they have confidence in their counter-measures to deal with outside forces, or they just wish to ride the wave of reckless abandonment that comes with siding with what is right while defying wrongdoers, regardless of the consequences, then it’s time to build a society for all.

Once a sizeable percentage of a population have summoned the awareness, desire and courage in their convictions to attempt to rid themselves of the gross injustices and inequalities they face in everyday life under their glorified wrongdoers heel, without becoming the very thing they wish to rid themselves of, they would find the hordes of their populations contented slaves and well-paid wrongdoers would not stop coming at them until their masters sources of power were stripped from them.

The age-old practice of masters declaring their obedient slaves as the “good guys” while they inflict the term “bad guys” and every wrong imaginable onto those who side with righteousness (in its varying degrees) just to serve the interests of the few, is always an issue the more benevolent among us have to deal with when attempting to do what is right, instead of just saying what is right.

The endless moral hypocrisy that so many value in exchange for a degree of wealth and status is a well-worn tool every social hierarchy uses, and this helps to ensure most of us will harm those we are told to harm when we are armed with only the frail perception of righteousness, and a blindness to our masters malicious’ nature. However, this shall not stop us from at least theorising the most likely path that could succeed in taking us away from our cultures of hate, greed, injustice and inequality and towards societies that respect all equally and contemplate the benefits of such societies. If any status seekers among us have made it to this stage in the book before organising their local more-thans to stage a book burning event, then they may want to start gathering some firewood or skip ahead a few paragraphs, as this is going to get ugly.

So once we have removed our glorified wrongdoers from their elevated positions, where do we begin? Well, it is rather obvious to many (especially all those murdered for trying) that the most effective way, as we touched on earlier, to combat extreme inequality and injustice, is to address the source of differing worth. So in our case, our medium of exchange (MOE) or money. It is the source of power for our glorified wrongdoer, it allows them to buy as many thieves, abusers, rapists and murderers as they need to fulfil their desires. This fiction is the most powerful medium of control among our status seekers, and as long as it is monopolised by the few, an exclusive MOE will always be used to champion gross injustice and inequality in favour of that few.

Creating an inclusive and transparent MOE that belongs to and is controlled by all who use it would counter most of the harm we inflict upon one another in the name of whatever fictions or lies we are conditioned to value. A MOE that is shared equally among all, in order to value the worth of every individual to the same degree, would create an equality of worth regardless of how many flatterers or wrongdoers we surround ourselves with. A basic universal income, if you like. Now, of course, status seekers will tell anyone who will listen to them that such things are impossible (unless they control it to control other with), as high-status people are hard-working and deserve more than the lazy low-status people. Despite the fact that all empires are built and maintained by the low-status slave classes. But this is just the kind of ignorances that are championed within cultures of greed, and any group that tries to become worthy to all must understand such ignorances and manipulations to avoid the fate of our slave nations.

Let’s say everyone in society gets the same income regardless of what they contribute to society. We could argue there would be a level of resentment for those who don’t contribute to the same degree, but any resentment within such a culture would be dwarfed by the level of resentment generated by gross inequality within our cultures of greed. If we have machines that do all the work for us so that we can all actually live our lives or do as we please with much of our time, then maybe this won’t be an issue. Until then, there is going to be a need for work to get done.

So it would be fair to say that if everyone got a basic income and then gained an equal amount of extra income based on all spending X amount of time contributing to society (as our most precious MOE is our own time), then we can earn worth based on the amount of time we spend contributing or working, rather than on our status, sex, race, wealth, wrongdoing or personal relationships with others, in the way social hierarchies do. Equality would be more attainable if all gained the same worth for doing the same work.

If we were to valued equal worth and abandon our status seekers nonsense of perceiving the time of more-thans as being worth more than the time of less-thans, then we could easily base our MOE on our time as well as efforts instead of on our relationships to a glorified few. We can create an infinite amount of money, but we all have a finite amount of time, and nobody’s time is more valuable than anyone else’s, no matter how many status seekers claim otherwise.

We then may have the problem of differing work ethic, productivity and efficiency that can be an issue within any field of work. We could argue that this may cause all of these things to slow down to the lowest level, as behaviour can be contagious if all attempt to match their equal income to their output. However, this could be countered in many ways, such as a grading of work types that we all must work our way through. Let’s say, for example, jobs are graded A to Z, and all grade A jobs are the jobs few people want to do, and grade Z jobs are the jobs most people want. Everyone must complete a certain amount of time and competence in each grade in order to advance to the next, and maybe even award an increase in income and responsibility with each grade to facilitate the process of going from a culture of greed to a culture of equal worth.

We must remind ourselves that the problem of differing work output is heightened within our cultures of differing worth. In a more egalitarian culture there would not be the same need for everyone to exploit their fellow workers to the extent our culture of greed values. Needless to say, it would not take much to improve on our social hierarchal method of workforce. It has the word force in it for a reason.

Some may believe that equality of income or worth would lead to very few wanting to take on a role with more responsibility if there is not much extra reward, and some may argue that a certain level of reward may be acceptable for certain roles, but not to anything like the degree of excess we have within our cultures of greed. Today we have more-thans who earn 2,000,000% more than less-thans, and there is no amount of lies that could be sold to anyone other than a status seeker who would agree that any human being can outwork another by 2 million per cent. We could argue that those who have a genuine desire and are capable within their field would end up taking on those roles based on a desire to serve the field and their own level of interest, rather than just to satisfy any desire for wealth and status when there is little worth put on such things.

Within our greed based cultures, many go into a profession not because they have a passion for the field, but simply to gain the wealth and status that comes with the role. However, in a more egalitarian culture, this would be reduced dramatically. So if we had equality of worth and opportunity, we would have those roles filled with people who have a genuine desire for their field, instead of wealth and status being the motivating factor for positions of responsibility. We could show an appreciation for those more competent within any field, and if most are encouraged to be more benevolent than malicious, then the more competent would be more willing to share their level of competence with others when free from the ignorance of differing worth and all its trappings.

Instead of suppressing those who are more than competent but deemed too unworthy or too less-than to attain positions of responsibility, all could have a fair shot in every field. Bear in mind that within our master/slave cultures, the majority of jobs are arguably only necessary in feeding the greed of the few, so a society void of such greed would have no need for the army of workers who peddle their trade in the lying, status-seeking, endless middlemen/women and other wrongdoing industries. Not to mention the waste of time and effort that goes into our sub-par tools, or the destroying and rebuilding these cultures are so fond of with their wars.

By removing the need to glorify a few at the cost of everyone else, there would be a substantial increase in the percentage of people available to work in vastly more socially productive industries. Instead of most having to work their whole lives just to scrape an existence from the murky boots of tyranny in order to play the less-than roles status seekers rely on, while a few glorified wrongdoers declare themselves as gods with the touch of a button, we can have societies where all are valued members by limiting the ignorances of glorifying and demonizing.

Free from feeding the greed of a few, there would be no need to force people to work 5 to 7 days a week in order to keep them too busy to question their oppressors. We could easily run an egalitarian culture on a 3-day work week (or even less when we remove most of the jobs that are unnecessary to useless when wrongdoing is not our main practice), leaving us 4 days for family, leisure, learning or whatever we wish, even extra work. Always better to work smarter than harder.

The Tyrants Nightmare

Let’s take this concept further still and imagine for a moment that everyone is awarded the same worth, and therefore income (if this is still used as our measure of worth), regardless of what they contribute to their communities. Now, of course, any status seeker or anyone else that suffers from the ignorance of differing worth could possibly find such a concept offensive, but let’s ignore them for a moment. With no obligation to do anything, we could argue that some would do exactly that.

However, if we live in a community that values everyone equally, the vast majority of individuals who experience such an environment would not just be willing to contribute, but would arguably be eager to do so. We must also acknowledge the immense knowledge that comes with doing nothing, as we can gain a depth of understanding from stepping away from expectations, as well as from the joy of being directionless or aimless. A concept that will, of course, be alien to many within our hierarchal cultures.

Within an egalitarian culture where co-operation assists in the development of skills and knowledge, most, if not all, would find something they would value participating in. Even if some find joy and contentment in cleaning toilets, while others find the same in performing open-heart surgery, we can still value each contributor equally, even if we wish to elevate one act above another. We can appreciate a more complex or arduous effort made by anyone without the need to belittle or devalue others who engage in a perceived less demanding activity. If we take differing efforts to an extreme, we could argue that only by allocating the same worth upon those who spend their lives contributing the minimum of their time to their community, as we would to those who spend the maximum of their time contributing to their community, can we come close to a free and fair society. But perhaps until then, just having an inclusive MOE would be a start.

As our hierarchies industries are dominated by our sockmaker’s minions that are placed into positions of influence and leaders within each industry, but are sold as these special entrepreneurs to encourage more effort and submission from their slaves, many come to believe the nonsense of “special people” within many industries. With our socks as a marker of worth, many seem to fall for the blatant lie of their puppets’ coveted titles of “industry leaders” or the even more ridiculous concept of “the richest person in the world”, despite the fact that their sockmakers can take their wealth from them the moment they disobey orders. Even though our sockmakers make the socks everyone uses, many believe that these glorified puppets are special in some way.

The monopoly of our MOE and its use to orchestrate its need for the survival of many, combined with the glorification of futile elongated employment, is little more than a way for our glorified wrongdoers to submerge their populations in the struggle for social worth in order to distract most from the volume of wrongs they commit. Many people are too busy running on their master’s hamster wheel to take the time to notice that they and their children are being fleeced, used, abused, raped, tortured and murdered on mass by those who dangle the carrot of social worth in front of them, while threatening them with the stick of poverty and ruin at the same time.

When we can spend a lifetime chasing a MOE just to have it all taken from us by our violent monopolists, playing their games only encourages their wrongdoing. Our sockmakers empire is the largest in known history, but by using their puppet political systems within their puppet empires to hide behind in order to avoid any consequences from their regular genocides, few of their obedient slave even recognise their real masters’ regions of conquest.

Too many are all too willing to believe the obvious lies that magically transform our sockmakers aggressive wrongdoers into heroic defenders of some fiction or another, with their genocides heralded as righteous victories in the eyes of anyone who desires a degree of elevated worth within their cultures. By using their indoctrination systems to produce populations that can’t even recognise the difference between a male and female, our sockmakers can rest assured that many of their slaves will certainly lack the ability to recognise the difference between a glorified aggressor and a demonised defender.

In the battle to avoid the control of our sockamkers, there will always be those who come up with alternatives to their socks, and this makes any such alternative something to be destroyed or monopolised by our sockmakers. Any MOE allowing financial privacy that is free from the control and manipulation of our sockmakers, is, of course, not something our most prolific glorified wrongdoers wish to exist for their slaves. By branding those who use anything other than their MOE as criminals and terrorists, our sockmakers who vastly surpass any competition for such titles, attempt to justify (to themselves and the less aware) all the wrongs they commit in maintaining their monopoly on all of the MOE’s we all use.

Our sockmakers flooding of the digital currency market to destroy any competitor to their monopoly, and using them to exercise their common practice of stealing and defrauding people, is just one example of how they ensure a docile population stays well away from any alternative that offers financial freedom and privacy, and stays firmly within the grasp of their glorified wrongdoers. Any alternative that offers the financial privacy and freedom our sockmakers take for granted will always be a target for our most prolific of wrongdoers, and as long as a few control our MOE, only those few will have financial privacy and freedom, while everyone else can be financially violated by our sanctioned thieves.

If we manage to create an inclusive MOE, then we could ensure equal worth extends to our intellect. We could have education systems that actually teach truths to each generation to yield vastly greater understandings in our populations than anything our glorified wrongdoer’s slave schools (that deal in servile systems of lies, hate, and ignorances) can ever produce. Hierarchal cultures use of less-than and more-than schools that are designed to divide their populations by status and obedience could easily be replaced with a far more productive system.

Instead of a system that champions the intelligence ignorance in order to produce more-thans and less-thans, we could have an education system that understands intelligence and allows, aids and encourages the differing levels, pace and interests each individual has, so that we can excel at what we are good at and work on things we are not so good at. Instead of our lower and higher education, we could just have education systems that are not required to allow social status to plateau their intellect, in order to segregate and convince many to view everything and each other through the prism of differing worth.

Instead of indoctrinating people into our cults of differing worth that must glorify every wrong and their status-seeking doers of wrongs, we could allow and encourage people to recognise wrongs and their doers for what they truly are. Without a few controlling the awareness of their slaves, no one would have to waste their childhood trying to become any master’s ideal slave, and instead enjoy their childhood and their desire to learn in the way we are arguably should. With a more aware population, we could advance every field at a pace no culture of greed ever could, as every field can benefit from the knowledge of all when free from the practice of glorifying individuals that claim to take sole credit for the work of others, just to pander to the egos and ignorances of a few.

Our tools would become very advanced with more minds free to work on them and develop them free from restraint. We are more than capable of producing high quality tools when void of the need for more-than/less-than variation, just to satisfy our status seekers egos and ignorances. Without the need to elevate and belittle others, the sciences could actually stand a chance of developing at a proper pace when freed from the constant manipulations social hierarchies inflict upon these fields, just to control and align them with their own interests and dogma. An education system that teaches all how their public systems function and how they can access them is possible when void of the manipulators and liars who profit so much from excluding access for most.

With social equality, we could have an inclusive justice system that actually values justice for all, instead of an exclusive one that champions and aids the wrongdoing of those with more status and wealth. Accessibility for all can be easily achieved by teaching everyone how to access their justice system with laws that are transparent, just and unambiguous, to end wrongdoing being treated as a perk of elevated worth. A system that holds wrongdoers accountable for their acts, regardless of their wealth and status, and void of the vindictive nature that our social hierarchal justice systems are known for.

A system that doesn’t have to harm those who harm no one, just to feed the greed of a few. A justice system that values informed consent over deceitful and coerced consent, and can resolve cases in days and weeks, instead of the months and years that our glorified wrongdoers’ injustice systems take in order to hold a high number of “customers” within their pseudo-justice industries to maximise profits. We could end the nonsense of a glorified few dominating our justice systems to steal from and harm so many, if populations demand an inclusive justice system over a monopolised one.

We all have a sense of right and wrong, but allowing a handful of wrongdoers to determine what is right and wrong will always end in tyranny. In a more just culture where equality has value and immunity to wrongdoing does not, courts would be nowhere near as busy as they are in our criminal utopia, as there would be less need or tolerance for wrongdoing. Additionally, without the practice of criminalising human behaviour in order to enrich a few, our justice systems could be used for aiding social harmony rather than destroying it.

A justice system that makes decisions based on laws and evidence, rather than the words of their fellow high-status liars, is more than achievable. With a system of just laws that can never be superseded in order to prevent future status seekers trespassing on the rights of others, we can ensure that our cultures can advance with the certainty that true equality and justice offers, instead of taking 1 step forward then 3 steps back to satisfy the next generation of status seekers malice and gross injustices as they supersede old just laws to enrich themselves with more unjust new ones.

In the last few remaining and small in size egalitarian societies we have left, the population police themselves, as they are arguably vastly more aware of what is right and wrong than any slave population that has been conditioned to accept the many wrongs of their masters, or anyone bestowed with a degree of status. Our populations that are afflicted by a culture of greed are all policed by their glorified wrongdoers’ cult followers, and this has always served our wrongdoers well at the cost of our slave populations. If populations policed themselves or policing is made one of the jobs that all can participate in, there would arguably be fewer wrongs committed, especially against those who harm no one.

With all educated and trained in their laws and how to address anyone that breaks those laws, or violates the rights of others, populations can have much fairer and just enforcers, and be free from the malicious minds that are attracted to becoming a social hierarchal enforcer. If all have a value in society, then all have an interest in protecting it.

Unlike in our social hierarchal societies, where most have little worth and so rightly put little value in that society. It is always amusing when our hierarchy’s minions are tasked with reporting things like mass looting and destruction within their cultures of greed, while claiming to have no possible understanding of what they witness other than the acts of evil criminals. Yet they prop up their own glorified criminals who destroy communities and loot from others on a daily basis.

Freedoms often come with responsibilities, but social hierarchies are always bad examples when it comes to being responsible, as they declare themselves and their minion unaccountable for their actions and wrongs, and tend to pass it on when it is in the form of blame and desperately try to grab it from others when it is in the form of praise. Responsibility can range from something we either embrace with ease or shy away from, but we can all be encouraged to accept it or (as in the case of our cultures of greed) avoid it at all costs when there is no wealth or status up for grabs.

When we are exposed to responsibility at a young age, it can help us respect our freedoms, but it is interesting that when many are overburdened with excess responsibility that is arguably unreasonable in childhood, they often avoid it as adults. Whereas many of us who are spared the overburdening of responsibilities (or even any, for that matter) in childhood often seek it out as adults to some degree. The overburdened child tends to cope better than most with responsibility in adulthood. As with anything, we adapt to the environments we endure, but avoiding it can seem like incompetence to others, whereas the opposite tends to be the case.

The overburdened are often more competent than most in dealing with responsibility, but their lack of interest in it can be mistaken as a lack of ambition, confidence or ability, especially among status seekers who are mired in the ignorance of differing worth. When we know we are capable, we have less need to prove it to ourselves or others. When we have not had to be capable of anything, we can have more of a need to prove to ourselves or others that we are capable. Our desire for or disinterest in social status can also play its part in our willingness to take on responsibilities.

It can be argued that the overburdened put a high value on freedom from responsibility. Thus, by avoiding trivial or unnecessary responsibilities (definitions will vary) that are abundant within cultures of greed, they get to enjoy more freedom than most as a way of making up for the freedoms lost to responsibilities in childhood. Our individual competence and desire for responsibilities is, of course, a very varied and complicated spectrum, but we can all certainly be conditioned or prepared to handle responsibilities within our groups. Within our hierarchies, we endure our status seekers pretending that only a select few of the “special” people they brand as capable of responsibility, despite displaying with remarkable consistency that their more-thans are anything but.

Many have tried to create their own political systems and even political parties within their master’s system to challenge the master/slave dynamic of their cultures. No master group is going to end their mass exploitation of their slave populations that serve their every need, so it is more often than not left to the slaves to rid themselves of those who inflict the gross injustices they experience. However, when even our slave groups succumb to social status, they too descend into the depths of gross inequality and injustice that comes with elevating and devaluing the worth of different individuals or groups.

An accountable, inclusive political system that all have access to and all have a say in, no matter how many truths they tell or how many freedoms they exercise, would be a huge step forward for any population. Freedoms that can’t be removed and laws that can be changed without the agreement of the majority of any population, instead of only those who profit from such things, should be a basic. Avoiding social status and restricting status to competence within any particular field, would be a huge advantage for all. While eliminating the glorifying and demonising our wrongdoing cultures require to maintain their gross inequality and injustice, would aid any society enormously, as they are both practices that celebrate lies and the liars that parrot them.

Instead of our sockmakers puppet political systems or even the independently tyrannical mimicking political systems of exclusivity that our hierarchies love, we could have an inclusive, open and transparent political system that all can freely participate in. Instead of judging their glorified, polished turds by their contrived “personalities” every few years, as the only political decision most will ever make, we could have a much more honest and engaging system that allows all to contribute to real decisions that affect all and their communities. We could even fill our history books with the truth to aid those who come after us, instead of hindering them with our endless lies.

To avoid or just limit wars, we could have a real world peacekeeping system where every state has an equal voice and status, to ensure any aggressive warmongers are met with the force of every other state, instead of our sockmakers warmongers that pretend to be peacekeepers in an effort to transform their acts of terror into some fake noble cause. Instead of individual “yes men” (and women) that have been selected for their level of compliance, greed and malice to oversee fields that they know nothing about, we could have groups from those that actually work within any field to oversee and develop their field, without the need to hinder it with our masters’ minions. A small child could develop a more efficient political system than the ones our status seekers produce, so there are many options that would serve the interests of all instead of just a few.

Instead of our populations all working to serve the interests of the few, if we had populations that were free to choose what they want in their communities and given the freedom to choose what they want to do with their lives outside of our base contributions or social obligations (for want of a better term), then the best ideas or projects would attract the most people to aid in their completion. We could rid ourselves of these farcical puppet political systems where all involved “heroically” serve themselves, while trying to differentiate themselves with the superficial and the ridiculous in a bid to sell the illusion of political choice, which leads to their pointless elections where the only winner is their hierarchy or sockmakers.

By valuing transparency and accountability over secrecy and immunity within all social bodies, we can at least tackle, if not eliminate, much of the mass wrongdoing our cultures of hate celebrate. Instead of being saddled with status seekers that sell themselves as leaders (albeit only to those that define such a thing as striving to elevate their own worth), we could allow true leaders (those that strive to make themselves redundant) that are vastly more capable of contributing a group of worth to have more influence within our groups. Or better still, a group of people who are just honest, mature adults who are capable of a basic level of understanding that surpasses all status seekers.

So to recap on any attempt to escape from the tyranny that social hierarchies inflict upon so many, and to achieve even a slightly more righteous society that would be worth valuing, we must have an inclusive MOE that ideally guarantees a basis of equality of income and therefore worth for all, and grants a degree of privacy for all and not just a few. A transparent political and judicial system that is open to all. An open education system that celebrates knowledge and questions lies, instead of insisting they be repeated, and ensure all are taught exactly how their society really functions and how they can access it. A workforce structure that is fair and open, where all contribute an equal minimum to their community while maintaining social equality.

Easy enough, eh! Then maybe a competent health care system would stand a chance of developing as well as every field of science, and our poison food industry could be replaced with a nutritious food industry. But maybe we go too far. Change for good can always be sold as bad in the minds of the fearful, so most advances must struggle with the inevitable fear and hate campaigns our glorified wrongdoers value and profit from so much.

There will always be a percentage of slaves who are attracted to those selling any alternative to their oppression within all social hierarchies, but it is when many contented slaves can perceive a realistic alternative to their oppression (assuming they understand they are oppressed, that is) that spells trouble for any hierarchy. Rebellion against servitude to the few is common (even if it is not taught to slaves), and rightly so when human beings are treated as the playthings of others, but common sense reactions are always vilified by hierarchies when it suits them.

Treason, nations, religions, political doctrine, ever-changing legal codes…etc., are great concepts for all liars and wrongdoers to use in exploiting others, while pretending to base their actions on a superficial ideology. Treason is always a joke. Even the most socially disengaged individuals become traitors to a hierarchy if they happen to exist within one of their ever-changing borders on a map and have declared no interest in serving any hierarchy. Nobody can betray those they have never known or made agreements with, but no hierarchy allows reason to get in the way of their greed.

Whether we call it betrayal, rebellion, justice, common sense or action based on the understanding of our self-worth, social hierarchies will always face a constant struggle to maintain a percentage of their slave’s obedience. When surrounded and outnumbered by the slaves that they must consistently wrong, it is no wonder our glorified wrongdoers are overly concerned with their security and oppressing all around them as much as possible, in order to prevent their victims from seeking justice.

With many of our master/slave cultures selling themselves as a democracy that values freedom, and a large percentage of their slaves valuing such lies that their eyes could easily expose if they used them, it is likely that this obvious manipulation will be used for some time to come, due to its level of success in producing generations of obedient slaves. Even with the constant need to beg for freedoms and rights, many within these slave populations remain ignorant to the nature of their groups. The free don’t ask any master for permission to be free. They simply exercise their freedoms. Yet our deluded slaves perceive themselves as free, while they allow their limited freedoms to be reliant on their masters will.

Most of us may be doomed to endure the fear-based cultures of social hierarchies for all of our existence, but there are far more efficient and pleasant cultures we are capable of creating that could remove the noose of differing worth from the necks of humanity. Social status is the enemy of equality and justice, so as long as it holds value in the minds of individuals within any group, inequality and injustice will follow. In general, the more status we have, the less compassion we have, or the more we seek status, the less compassion we have for those we wish to be more-than. If we have adopted enough ignorances to believe we are more-than others, then we are vastly more capable of inflicting harm on those whom we view as less-than. The level of malice and vindictiveness we can gain from being surrounded by our fellow glorified wrongdoers and sycophants is fully displayed within every social hierarchy.

Imagine if status seekers had their own communities. Just groups of people who exclusively wished to be more-than others. They could get on with the practices of status-seeking by stealing, abusing, raping and murdering each other in an effort to elevate themselves from one another. A live by the sword, die by the sword kind of thing. And if the less ignorant, who are more content to value each other’s worth, had their own communities that could value compassion when free from status seekers, where they are free to build and create without the destructiveness of status seekers raining doom and gloom over everything with their incessant wrongdoing. They would produce two very different environments.

However, we are not so one-dimensional. The benevolent can become malicious, and the malicious can become benevolent, as there is a degree of each within us all. Recognising our nature and how we can accommodate all that we are would benefit our communities. But, of course, our glorified wrongdoers are forever using lies to tell their populations what they are and what to do, in order to create enough support to view feeding the greed of the few as the best and even only kind of society we are capable of creating.

Impulsive Compliance Disorder

Perhaps we shall always organise our large social groups in a way that celebrates the worst of what we are. If the definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, then slave populations who continually beg their hierarchy for some rights or to be free from the wrongs they practice, while always getting the same results, is just insane. Yet this ritual is commonly displayed within hierarchies over and over again, as their obedient slaves follow the controlling processes of their masters, who condition them to believe that non-violent protests are an effective measure in limiting the gross wrongs of their masters, even though hierarchies themselves display violence as much more effective at keeping oppressors at bay when it comes to competitors.

How many social hierarchies or nations were born out of non-violent protests? Most empires rise with violence and fall to violence. No hierarchy has ever thought to end their wrongful ways because a gathering of people begged to be less oppressed. Masters need slaves to make their lives easier, and slaves need to be oppressed, or they will serve their own interests over any masters. The whole role of being a master of slaves is to oppress them, so it is rather futile for slaves to beg their masters for rights, as they will always be limited, but with our modern debt slaves having been conditioned to confuse servitude with freedom, it happens all the time anyway.

As all social hierarchies require slaves, the endless protesting within them caused by the mass wrongdoings they practice will be forever a permanent feature for all of our descendants who inherit our slave cultures. Well, within groups that still have the “right” to protest at least. Instead of protests and petitions, and ignoring the effectiveness of force, we could argue that if more people and groups sued their governments and minions for their wrongdoing and the harm they cause (as we would if any other corporation were inflicting harm upon us), then we would be more successful at restraining the level of wrongdoing such cultures practice. Governments are just corporations that have monopolised the people, wealth and resources of a territory.

They are not some great defenders of right and wrong, as their goals are the same as any other corporation: profit. All the protests and petitions in the world can be ignored, but these champions of greed never ignore a loss of wealth. So suing them on mass is by far a more effective way to limit or prevent them from harming or wronging others than protests alone. Hence, why all of these glorified wrongdoers keep their populations as far from their laws as possible.

Then again, it’s their justice systems that are designed to always benefit themselves, and it would only be a matter of time before they made it illegal to sue all their glorified wrongdoers in order to maintain their practices of hate. As our modern slave nations are dependent on the fictitious identities their masters encourage or force them to adopt as their own, and with most slaves valuing this modern-day master’s branding, their masters portray themselves as the glorified identity associated with the fiction of nationalism.

Nationalism is a transparent effort to encourage the slave population to do what is best for their masters, who claim to be or represent these fictitious identities, and this allows them to be viewed as these modern-day gods who guide their flock. As nationalism or the glorification of a social hierarchy and their territorial dominion of slaves and resources, encourages hate towards differing groups (just like all social hierarchies), it would arguably not be as rife if everyone got to experience living in every part of the world.

Imagine instead of being defined by any master’s border, we defined ourselves by the planet we live in. If all had the freedom and ability to move around and truly experience our planet and life in different environments and places, and we had the choice to choose anywhere to live (with the exception of family ties), many of us may not be so eager to limit our identity to our masters fictions and be more than happy to live outside of any masters imaginary lines that we were born within. Then again, there is no place like home.

As many populations are encouraged to be proud of and have faith in such lies and fictions like countries, political ideologies, gods, religions, money,...etc., that are all owned by a few, such populations will always be slaves to that few. The only things worthy for any population to put their faith in, other than themselves and those that display integrity, are the timeless things that are inclusive to all, and certainly not our glorified wrongdoer’s periodic monopolies of exclusion.

When it comes to hierarchal social structures, these parochial systems we endure are not so much doomed to corruption, but come as a standard practice, because that is the nature of those who believe themselves to be more-than others. Only when all are socially equal and free to take a degree of responsibility within their social structures, do we have a culture worth valuing. We should all have the same level of control over our lives, instead of many having little to none, and a glorified few having part to total control over many or even millions of others. But shoulda, woulda, coulda, changes little.

The futility of even trying to improve our social groups under a social hierarchy can be seen over time. They all end up being much of a muchness, no matter how many battles or wars their slaves win or how progressive their hierarchies believe themselves to be, as social status is too corruptive and destructive within our groups. With an overabundance of liars for hire, true progress holds as little value as the truth. On an individual level, outside of the master, status seeker and contented slave, there is little motivation to get involved within the superficial communities these cultures produce.

When a lifetime of working hard for something can all be stolen and destroyed at any time by our glorified wrongdoers, and when doing what is right or just being honest can result in us being harmed, we keep many who could enhance and help develop our communities to the fringes of them. Social disinterest is common within our cultures of hate, and this disinterest hampers our communities, but, of course, aids our glorified wrongdoers in monopolising them and inflicting their wrongs with impunity.

The gross wrongdoing of our fledgling social hierarchies’ first generation of victims are often remembered by their descendants. And this can even play a role in any resistance or downfall of the hierarchies last generation. Most social hierarchies do well to last a few hundred years if they are lucky, before they are held accountable for their deeds or their luck just runs out before they are replaced with another. So they have never been valued on the scale our glorified liars try to sell them as.

A few generations at best sustain their god-like status before being replaced with others who are equally self-absorbed, delusional and hell-bent on harming others. Most of our world today is a representation of our inability to form a human society worthy of being valued, as divisions are valued and unity is feared by every hierarchy. With the glorification of gross inequality and injustice being widespread throughout our planet’s human societies, it is only a matter of time before they all fall when the unity they fail to cultivate is required, yet obviously absent.

When within a social hierarchal culture, we can be forgiven for assuming most of those around us are content or even happy to obey their glorified wrongdoers, as all display a degree of obedience to the tyranny raging around them (some more than others). However, as most of us have at least a theoretical sense of right and wrong within us, even the most obedient among us are often in disagreement with our masters’ will, albeit often hidden from public view to avoid obvious consequences.

The hilarious social mimicry that we use in order to avoid becoming a target of our glorified wrongdoers also encourages the wrongdoing that we disagree with and wish to avoid. So in a way, we could argue that this apparent acceptance of gross injustice makes us all complicit in the enforcement of it. Few of us are willing to accept that we are the tyrants, the friends or even just the begrudging facilitators of tyranny by our actions. Even when we condemn those who do no wrong, or harm others simply because our masters tell us to, we often still maintain a delusional, elevated moral identity of ourselves. As we are belittled for having little to no interest in repeating lies or flattering the most vile among us, most are willing to engage in such acts to avoid ridicule, even when doing so means we are treated as less-than the things we possess.

Masters will always need to force people to contribute to their luxurious lifestyles, as few self-respecting individuals see value in fulfilling the desires of gross wrongdoers. As our master/slave cultures always need more slaves than masters, and only a small percentage of their populations can attain the more-than definitions of success these cultures dangle like a carrot on a string for those who value such lies, too many of us are more than happy to go along with striving for their masters definitions of success and status.

Just so we can wallow in its ego filled luxury at the cost of much of what we are, and those around us. Modern social hierarchies sell the idea that to desire more wealth makes us more than those who desire less wealth, but we could use the same logic in saying that those who desire more equality are more than those who desire less, it all comes down to what we value. Many of us just adopt the values that those around us impose upon us, or the values our environments, experiences and interpretations teach us.

Social hierarchies sell the idea of competition being the driving force of their limited perception of “success”, while relying on the cooperation of the populations they enslave by force. Bear in mind, our glorified hypocrites contradicting themselves is a very commonly valued practice, so many who are less aware can find total reason in this lie. If competition was really valued by our rampant monopolisers, then perhaps we should encourage everyone to go around murdering, stealing, raping, using and abusing each other to allow our most competent murderers, thieves, rapist, users and abusers to be revered for their efforts, instead of only allowing a select few to partake in their uncompetitive industry of wrongdoing.

We always possess the ability to escape our social hierarchies and sockmaker’s dystopia, but whether we ever activate this ability or always allow our ignorances and superficial divisions to maintain the level of human misery social hierarchies inflict upon our species, only time will tell. As long as most of us are willing to spend our lives serving the interests of a few, while limiting or abandoning our own interests that do not align with our masters, our children will always suffer from gross wrongdoing, and glorified wrongdoers will always thrive. Perhaps one day we will advance from the age of differing worth to the age of equal worth, but until then, we must all navigate through our hordes of wrongdoers as best we can.

The Conforming Nonconformist

There are pros and cons to whether we choose obedience or non-obedience to the greed of a few. We each choose (at some conscious level) to some degree what we value more: the rewards that come with obeying the few, with all the disadvantages that come with being a good slave, or instead reap the rewards of being a free-thinking human being, with all the disadvantages that come with being a bad slave. Although to say we choose these things can be somewhat misleading, as we could argue about the degree of thought each individual gives to such matters.

We have no control over the cult or culture we are born into, and even if in those early years we are aware of the ignorances of those around us, many may believe there is not much of a choice to be made, as we are all slaves to our psychological processing and our environments (some more than others). However, we always have the ability to make choices at any time, whether we are aware of it or not.

Any choice we may make to aid or hinder injustice and inequality can be a conscious or unconscious one. As a conformist, we are less likely to question our conformity, as the mere act of conforming to the will of a few displays the lack of thought or care behind our acts. Especially the more extreme our acts are. As we would expect from a non-conformist, a degree of thought outside the dogma and lies of our glorified wrongdoers is required to resist conforming to the greed of a few. So a mind that values high-status liars is going to have a very different understanding and perception of their world than a mind that is freer to question everything.

Conformists will always be more highly prized within cultures that value inequality, as they accept and aid their glorified wrongdoers, with their desire to belong clouding their reasoning. As a conformist is generally rewarded with more wealth and status than non-conformists, this pandering to our base desires encourages conformists to wallow in their ignorances, with the delusion that they are more-than non-conformists. This practice encourages more conformity or a snowball effect of conformity.

A non-conformist may invite more harm their way, but the alternative may be even more harmful to them. Having said all that, a pseudo-conforming non-conformist can deceive the deceivers into thinking they are one of them in order to benefit from the advantages of conformity, while avoiding the disadvantages that come with a shackled mind. The outer strength that conformity affords those who herd within large groups, and the inner strength that non-conformity affords those who stand alone, may not receive the same worth by the opposing parties, but each holds a degree of worth to us all.

So are we doomed to endure social hierarchal cultures until the next big cataclysm, or up until our extinction? Maybe, probably. We are not the only species that has used the desire for sex and differing social worth to influence their overall behaviours, but we are arguably one of the few willing to destroy all around us for sex. Despite the conditioning from compassionate to selfishness, despite the wealth and status awarded for wrongdoing, despite the fictions many are conditioned to identify with in order to hate and harm cousin and kin, and despite the worshipping of lies and liars, our populations still have a large percentage of people who do want to live in a society that values equality, right over wrong and have a basic respect for all (even if it is only a theoretical perception for many), but they are largely divided and isolated by their masters actions and fictions, as most are within our master/slave cultures.

It has never been easier for people to unite together, and if those who wish to create an egalitarian culture could organise themselves into even small groups that can grow, then they stand a chance of achieving such a goal. All they have to do is start. The first step in creating an egalitarian culture is to start an egalitarian group or organization. Uniting in numbers to support one another in the goals of the group is the basic principle of any human group (just ask our sockmakers). Although avoiding differing worth from our many status seekers is easier said than done. As our glorified wrongdoers create dependency within their slave populations, and an independent people don’t need to beg for their existence, if a population stopped allowing their glorified wrongdoers to monopolise everything without a meaningful challenge, then they could restrict the domination of tyranny.

The ignorance of differing worth does so much harm to so many, even to those who value the ignorance. Little if any good ever comes from social status, as its main value to humans is to serve the interests of our manipulators and wrongdoers. Despite this, it is an ignorance that is hard to escape, even within those that are closest to us. Perhaps modern humans have devolved into valuing this ignorance, or maybe we have suffered from it since before we became humans, so we are likely to be doomed to suffer from the special people syndrome for as long as we exist, just as other animals suffer from their own afflictions. However, as it is absent in so many, we could argue that egalitarian groups may have been more common in our past. We are certainly capable of overcoming this ignorance on an individual level, but to overcome it in large-scale groups is more challenging, as most revert back to our basic instincts when jostling for mates. In many ways, a sexual, rather than political, revolution could be more effective at eliminating the need for differing worth.

As a social species that loves sharing, confined within social hierarchies that hate sharing, it is no wonder many of us feel the assault on our very nature. Recognising this would be the first step in addressing it, but this would be almost impossible within the greed and miserableness that maintains our systems of slavery and servitude, as it holds too much value for all of elevated worth to abandon. We can achieve equality in large groups, even if our desire to be more-than resides within us all, but as long as those of us who see ourselves as more than others are controlling our groups, we will struggle to live in harmony with one another. We are all slaves to our desires (some more than others), but as long as mankind (why not humankind?) is anchored by social status, our groups will struggle to achieve much beyond serving the base desires of a few.

As we are capable of convincing ourselves that we are good, decent, moral and just human beings, even when we are prolifically inflicting every wrong onto others, social status allows all who value it to diminish their own personal responsibility for their own wrongdoings by dehumanizing their victims, while repeating the wrongdoer’s mantra of “I am just doing my job”. A large percentage of the army of glorified wrongdoers within all social hierarchies can spend their whole lives oblivious to their true nature and deeds, simply by valuing the perceived elevated worth their master’s dish out. Nature can provide us with all of our needs, but it will never be enough for our greed. We could argue that we are not greedy by nature, and no animal can take more from nature than it gives them, although it may be hard for people who have only ever know a social hierarchal society to agree..

Understanding that greed and hate are merely psychological tools we all have but don’t need to necessarily use with the same wild abandonment that our glorified wrongdoers use, may help many in avoiding becoming as shallow and malicious as our glorified wrongdoers. We do not have to live in a world where most people must bow to the whims of a tiny group of glorified people, and we don’t have to accept these cultures where any status seeker with even the most menial positions of authority can use it to abuse and trespass on the basic rights of so many.

We don’t have to define each other by a monopolised medium of exchange or the profit margins of a few corporations that sell their GDP as the defining worth of whole populations and cultures. We don’t have to allow the use of lies and fictions to exploit every individual and every generation. We don’t have to spend our lives mired in the struggles to attain the basics of water, food and shelter, just to keep us in servitude to the whims of a few. We are more than capable of freeing ourselves from the bondage of a greedy few in order to satisfy the basic needs of all, to help us achieve so much more than we could ever dream of under any slave/master culture.

When we reward and revere the wrongdoers among us, we ensure their proliferation. The habit of mass wrongdoing in the pursuit of elevated worth is an addiction that is hard to break for many. Social hierarchies are incapable of ending war, poverty, injustice, inequality, crime...etc., as these are things that they manufacture to grant them elevated status. Only within a society of equals, where all are treated fairly, and all have a genuine input in the actions of the group, can such things ever be addressed with ease and a degree of competence and sincerity.

With the “winners” mindset of many of our status seekers being stranded in the concepts of “if I win, you lose”, they are often blinded by the fact that all around them lose to such a miserly way of thinking. Many struggle to maintain their kindness and compassion within cultures that belittle such things, especially when those who abandon theirs are rebranded as winners. Instead of our cultures that pander to the “wins” of a few at the loss of everyone else, all could benefit from the wins in a society that grants all equal worth to attain social harmony.

Our greatest strength is often our greatest weakness. The few who benefit from our social hierarchies may perceive differing worth as a great strength, but it is by far our greatest weakness. It weakens everything we do, every field, every community, every group, and every individual, even the ones who perceive this weakness as a strength. The willingness to harm others is always sold as a strength by hierarchies (well, as long as they are the ones doing the harm and not experiencing it). However, we could argue that the weak avoid suffering so that others can endure it, while the strong endure suffering so that others can avoid it.

When it comes to long-term survival, co-operation is by far a much more successful strategy than conflict, but as we are currently dominated by cultures of conflict that sell their wrongdoing as something to be admired, many value conflict as a strategy for “success”. This is obviously in part because many of us value differing worth and are susceptible to elevating our own base desires above the existence of others, but for those capable of avoiding such ignorances, co-operation is easily the best strategy for any group.

A population that is free from the chains of social status can include all to partake in its development and advancement willingly, instead of being forced to. We have, at almost any time and place, even among the most oppressive cultures, an overabundance of innovators, inventors, scholars, craftsmen and craftswomen who can advance any group to a great degree. But our glorified wrongdoers are too busy reducing them to a tool of exploitation for the good of a few, instead of exploiting their abilities for the good of all. If we ever do reach a point in time where we exploit our full potential with the equality of opportunity and worth, we can be sure it won’t be under a social hierarchy.

As social hierarchies limit the potential of all under their rule in order to fill their various positions of differing worth, we could argue that populations that are so easily blinded by the narratives of fraudsters and idiots stand little chance of developing past serving the few at the cost of the many. By organising our groups into ones that celebrate malice instead of ones that celebrate benevolence, we condemn ourselves to the endless cycles of mass wrongdoing and the persecution of those not willing to cheer it on.

Naw Ta

We are abound with groups that value those who harm others to serve their own interests, and belittle those who help others at their own cost. Instead of revering those who do much for others without need for rewards or titles, too many within these groups revere those who would gladly murder their own families. We can observe how badly we treat the more benevolent among us, while rewarding the more malicious among us in a visit to any such group, regardless of its time and place. If enough people just refused to cooperate with their glorified wrongdoers and their minions, they would not be so easily controlled into feeding the greed of a few. This is easier said than done, but we can always limit our compliance and contribution to such cultures.

Just as with many other species that use social status, our tyrannical rulers who rule with violence, more often than not come to a violent end, as they reap what they sow. The tyranny of differing worth is always an unstable reign that is only held together with force. Therefore, many social animals often choose more benevolent leaders who are much more equipped to provide stability within their group, without relying on divisive brute force alone. This too is displayed in our transition from traditional slavery to debt slavery, where the slightly less brutal style allows longer reigns.

Understanding this shows that any group that has no slaves of differing worth would have much more stability than those that do. We may now be predominantly a slave species, but we always have the power to break free from serving the greed of a few. But the will and the unity that is required to achieve this will always be under attack from our status seekers and those of us whose integrity is up for sale. Whether enough of us can resist these attacks is another matter, but our history and present show there are always those willing to resist forced or coerced servitude.

Slave populations are often told by their masters that a saviour of some kind will come along and save them from the injustices they experience. This is clearly an attempt to create apathy among their slaves to prevent them from taking any action against those who are responsible for the injustices they endure. While obedient slaves wait for their saviours (whether they are political, religious or some other kind), their obedience and lack of resistance to injustices help their masters to enslave their children and their children’s children and future generations.

By treating their slaves like children and with their obedient slaves acting like children, hierarchies create populations of adults who willingly strip themselves of responsibility for their own lives, and hand over their self-responsibilities to those eager to exploit them. We are born into inequality because those who came before us encouraged and accepted it, and if we are honest with ourselves, we too will most likely do the same for the generations that come after us. Thus subjecting them to the injustices we too were born into. This behaviour is very common among our species, as we are more willing to inflict a wrong onto others if we have had the same wrongs inflicted upon ourselves, often justifying it as simply part of life because it is part of our own.

Traditional slaves would frequently revolt by inflicting the same acts their masters inflicted upon them, but today’s debt slaves are more likely to protest, sign petitions and engage in endless pointless debates or orchestrated elections for their hierarchies puppets, just to maintain their complete servitude to the few. Power is energy, and energy is power. Therefore, what we spend our energy on becomes our power, so we should use it wisely. Many among the slave classes are unaware of the power they hold, as they are conditioned to perceive themselves as powerless compared with their masters. But when slaves stop valuing their masters’ orchestrated hate for one another, they can unite against their true oppressors.

All social hierarchies fear the prospect of having the wrongs they glorify being inflicted upon themselves, hence why they are always desperate to divide their slaves by turning them on one another, to stop them turning on them. Whether we unite under greed and wrongdoing or compassion and justice, there is always strength in unity. For as long as we cast a shadow, we have power. It may only start and end with the power of one, but even the power of one that is true can outshine the power of millions that are false, at least to those who can recognise the truth.

We may be closer than we have ever been to a small group of people enslaving all of the people on our planet to their will, but even as most of our populations have fallen into the shackles of our MOEM, there are still groups willing to attempt to right the endless wrongs most of the world gladly supports when their masters command it, despite the overwhelming odds against them. As this book is being finished, yet another of our sockmakers popular genocides is being heralded as some great act of justice by those who seek their socks and the status that comes with them. As most of our slave nations repeat the nonsense that their masters tell them to, and pay lip service to the pseudo-morality of the obvious wrongs of wholesale slaughter, less-thans are murdered on mass while these morally bankrupt groups pretend to dither over what to think and what to do, in order to give enough time for the land and resources to fall into the hands of their MOE masters.

Yet as much of the world is content to support, cheer on or turn a blind eye to mass murder, and while the glorified morally bankrupt that sell themselves as morally superior to all, limit any disdain for popular genocides to the brandishing of hollow words over any real action at the behest of their masters, we still get groups willing to act in order to halt such wrongs. The usual motivations for status seekers to fight with each other is always a factor when social hierarchies compete to out-wrong one another, but even some of our most disadvantaged groups do, on occasion, act with the intention to right wrongs, regardless of the consequences or the odds.

The willingness of groups that strive through overwhelming odds in the shadows of our largest empires is a common theme throughout our history, to our sockmakers dismay. Even as our modern sockmakers empire encompasses the globe, we can be sure they too will always face those unwilling to be their slaves, and like all empires that have come before them, this will contribute to their time being limited. Truth, justice, right, fairness and basic decency can only be ignored for so long, by so many, before enough of us recognise their absence and desire the presence of such things, even if it only results in a change of fictions.

No matter the advantages in manpower, technology, alliances or wealth of any oppressor, the smallest of organised groups can cripple the most powerful of empires, as there are advantages in disadvantages, just as there are disadvantages in advantages. The gross wrongdoing every empire engages in may be ignored by most who gain wealth and status from these wrongs, as well as those willing to obey those who sell the ignorance of differing worth as a virtue, but they are abundantly obvious to all who experience them, and these wrongs always sow the seeds of resistance all empires inspire. This makes true conflict (as opposed to our sockmakers more contrived ones) a timeless inevitability for as long as we value the ignorance of differing worth, and the status-seeking practices it produces.

The term freedom may have been monopolised by our modern-day slavemasters to sell their wrongs as rights to those unable or unwilling to differentiate between the two, but true freedom is something that most, if not all of us, value and revere to some degree, even if our status seekers are not too keen on others attaining it. If all were afforded the same freedoms, there would be less time, resources, and people lost to the restricting of freedoms that hierarchies practice. Those denied it the most are often the most willing to risk their lives in attaining it. A fact our empires can exploit and underestimate. As all social hierarchies are tyrannical in their nature, claiming to fight against what they are is always a lie, no matter how many of our sockmaker’s hierarchies brand those free from their control as the most evil empires in existence. Fighting tyranny with tyranny always results in tyranny.

As freedoms come and go for most populations, many alter their definitions to suit their perceptions. While our bodies and minds are both targets of status seekers, our minds are a more resourceful prize, as once captured, there is little to no attempt to escape from servitude. Many of us may lose our minds to our manipulators from time to time or even for as long as we exist, but we are all capable of resisting the onslaught of lies and behaviours that encourage obedience to a few. Free minds may be free of X but enslaved by Y, while enslaved minds are enslaved by X and free from Y, so in many ways we are as free and as enslaved as our minds allow us to be.

If we ask what the goals of our groups are, then we may shine a light on their true intent. As far as the goals of our hierarchal groups are concerned, their goals are always the same in glorifying the few so that they can wallow in their lavish lifestyles or at least have more than most at the cost of others. Outside of our hierarchies’ cultures of greed, we could define the goals of our groups as using the abilities of everyone in the group to aid one another, so that we can share in our collective efforts and knowledge in order to surpass an existence that comes with living in isolation.

So, arguably, the true goals of our groups are the exact opposite of the goals of our hierarchies, hence why there is always conflict within such groups. With the practice of mass murders and genocides taking place around the world with almost the same frequency as our status seekers’ lies, it is often easy to become apathetic to it all when it is happening far from our door. However, by doing little to end the practice of mass murder and even encouraging it (as many that value their hierarchies fictions do), it becomes only a matter of time before wholesale slaughter comes calling for us all.

Every obedient slave condemns their descendants to become the victims of the practices they helped to normalize, while others will feel it is better to be useless than to be useful in harming others to feed the greed of a few. Using a MOE to determine every human’s worth, so that those who control our mediums of worth are always able to exploit and harm all who are defined by it, is hardly our finest achievement. Human ambition and achievement has not always been this parochial, and we can move beyond elevating the worth of a few over others and the regressive practices that are required to attain and maintain the ignorance of differing worth.

It may be hard for many to even imagine a world where most do not have to waste their time mastering obedience and flattery just to avoid persecution, and instead spend their time attaining skills and knowledge in their chosen fields of interest, but it is always possible. Cultures that share will always outperform our cultures of greed. Monopolised trade may be the closest our cultures of greed come to sharing, and just as this limiting form of sharing within our debt slave cults generates more wealth than our traditional slave cults could, any culture that valued a more sincere form of sharing would surpass these more contrived forms of wealth very easily.

Every fiction and lie we create only exists for as long as they grant those who champion them a degree of wealth and status. When there is no reward on offer, our fictions and lies die off. These are often replaced (or more often than not overlapped) with a new set of fictions and lies that grant more rewards for anyone willing to value them. This is the cycle every hierarchy uses to secure their elevated worth. As long as our slave populations attach their identity to lies and fictions, and perceive differing worth in those attached to certain identities, they will always be protesting against the oppression this futility facilitates. If our groups and populations don’t understand or respect the equality of worth each and every individual has, while failing to share their mediums of worth equally with all, then we shall be forever persecuting and protesting to our own detriment.

As status seekers impose their obsessions of gaining superficial social validation and fear of superficial social disdain onto others, few within our groups live unchained by these constraints. Minds that are marinated in the ignorance of differing worth and all its ingredients of hate, injustice and inequality will always struggle to achieve any depth of understanding about themselves, never mind the groups they inhabit. Trying to create anything of worth within our cultures of hate is a bit like trying to build something in the no-man’s-land of a battlefield between two armies conditioned to destroy anything that is not under their master’s control. However, this will never stop some of us from trying.

The largest united groups among us are our groups that are united by greed and self-interest, and as long as our greed and malice remain our greatest uniting virtue (albeit a forced one), we shall likely sweep away all other smaller groups united by a more benevolent cause. We are not born with malice (or many other things), we learn it from experience. For those who experience it more than others, it can become part of us, just like any other habit. As all who abandon their integrity are elevated within our malicious groups, we could argue that they celebrate the weak who surrender to the group’s will and condemn the strong who resist.

As many of our status seekers bow to the practices of their glorified wrongdoers in order to attain a degree of elevated worth and therefore power over others, they often allow any power they are awarded over others to blind themselves to the fact that they often persecute those who have more power than themselves, as they mistake the monopoly of violence that is handed to them for surrendering their own power to a master, as more than the power of the self that they desperately try to destroy in others. At some conscious level, the desire to harm those who are strong enough to maintain their self is a reminder of what they themselves were too weak to retain.

When we have completely surrendered our own self-power to others to the point where we will persecute anyone we are told to without question, it can be difficult for us to accept that those we are conditioned to look down upon possess more of themself than we do. We could argue that the malice we show towards those who maintain their own self-power, when we have given away our own, is an attempt to validate the reasons that led to us surrendering our self-power to the greed of others. The weakness of character that is required to join our ranks of tyrants is encouraged by the gross mistreatment of those who maintain theirs. Creating positions of elevated worth is to tyrants what creating sweets is to kids.

Many of us spend our whole live oblivious to meaning beyond our own base desires, while others discover such meaning at various stages in life, with many freeing themselves of selfish meanings in their later years and some even in their earliest years and others in-between. If we adopt meaning in the fictions and lies of our status seekers, then we will always fail to recognise the worth in all around us. Those who control our mediums of worth can always monopolise meaning or anything else we value. Even the apparent “woke” movement or concept that is a modern rehash of less obedient slaves, encouraging obedient slaves to wake from their servile sleepwalking that their masters’ lullabies of lies induce, has been monopolised by the very groups that the concept warns of.

So now we get our gross wrongdoers and their minions championing the glory of their master’s lies, and using the concept of wokeness as just another political football to be kicked around when it suits their own particular narratives to gain support for the wrongs that benefit them so much. Weaving the endless genders lie into wokeness is just one example of our sockmakers attempt to undermine the truth or those who voice it, as they did after too many slaves questioned their boom and bust fraud after yet another cycle. Our sockmakers have a habit of ramping up their lying industries whenever their slaves start to question their MOE system that controls their worth, and it is not the first time they have used gender and sexuality as a distraction from their wrongs, and no doubt not the last.

Our need to value lies in order to pander to our ignorances of differing worth is all very wonderful for our master/slave cultures, but if we ever do wish for anything more than this, then we are going to have to at least recognise the truth in all its forms. The good, the bad and the ugly. Opinion based culture’s that allow all ignorant enough to value the lies of those with more social worth, while ignoring even the most obvious of truths, will always end up with whole populations going along with the most ridiculous of nonsense. When lies are sold as opinions and opinions become perceptions, then our perceptions will always be at odds with the truth, so most universal truths are valued only temporarily, if at all, within such cultures.

Should the structure of truth be recognised or come to have any real value within our groups, then we stand a real chance of creating more than the master/slave cultures too many of us know too well. Only our groups that can organise themself in such a way to counter the tactics of tyranny that our status seekers are fond of, will even value the elimination of our master/slave cultures and the development of something of worth. Whether we are optimists, pessimists or realists, the age of tyranny may one day give way to the age of liberty, if our perceptions allow it. Whereas if our perceptions are restricted to the lies of our glorified wrongdoers, the future of our children will always face exploitation.

The Meaning of Joy and the Joy of Meaning

Well, we are about done now (your medal is in the post) with covering the basics of how we organise our human groups. Like many things, it can be as complex or as simple as we wish it to be. But we are what we are. There may be no rewarding revelations or even any valid meaning within these pages for many, so let us end on a more philosophical note. What is the meaning of life? A question often asked by many, as well as those with too much status and not enough understanding.

All meaning is subjective and only exists in the minds of the creator. We can attach meaning to just about anything, and that is exactly what we do. Whether it’s winning, gods, status and wealth or family, health, knowledge and understanding, our environments and experiences determine what holds meaning in our minds. However, just for fun, let us take a stab at the question. We could argue that the meaning of all life comes down to joy. Some of us enjoy harming others, and we could argue most status seekers do this to various degrees, while most, if not all of us (even our most prolific wrongdoers) gain a form of joy from helping others. We may differ somewhat to the depths of joy we gain from different things, but we are all slaves to joy.

We receive joy from continuing the species, as in creating and nurturing the next generation we ensure our survival. All life is rewarded in some way for engaging in acts that aid its species survival, so we could argue that all life needs joy or a form of joy to survive. If we perceive our sense of joy as the only form, then we may be blinding ourselves to other forms experienced by different life forms. Thus, we could argue that life is the pursuit of joy. Therefore, joy is the meaning of all life. Life is a joy, especially when it is void of status seekers, so we would be wise to seek it where we can (without inflicting harm on others), as it is the reason we are all here. After all, we only exist because our parents had some joy… well, one of them at least.

Being social is a joy for our species (apparently), and our need to form close relationships is almost essential for our happiness and well-being. Hence, social hierarchies work hard to destroy the relationships of their slaves and the communities they wish to dominate. The more dominating the social hierarchy, the more isolated and divided their populations tend to be.

Communities within these social structures are reduced to little more than an effort to celebrate the more-thans and the obedience of their slaves. The joy of being social is taken from many within these superficial cultures, and rebranded or replaced with the joy of conformity. The joy of taking is dwarfed by the joy of sharing, although those of us who have been encouraged to take from others may disagree. But if enough of us understand this, then instead of being divided by greed, we could be united by sharing.

As we are all joy junkies, one joy can crush many pains, just as one pain can crush many joys. There are many forms of joy. The joys many of us attain by inflicting pain on others is arguably one of our most distasteful joys. While the joys we attain by helping those who rely on us the most or others in need are arguably the most treasured. Whether we are sharing it or taking it from others, joy is our greatest motivator, not fear.

Fear may be the preferred motivator of hierarchies, but it only goes so far, as fear is often just the absence of joy. It is very difficult to motivate someone using fear if they have no joy in life, or even if they find a joy in everything. Fear has its uses, but joy is far more inspirational to us. Our transition from traditional to debt slavery even shows that willing obedience is far more productive than forced obedience, as it contains slightly more joy. Even if those joys are manipulated ones.

Our joys are very important to our lives and can be shared within benevolent groups, but within our more common malicious groups that despise the very idea of sharing, joys become just another tool of exploitation and monopolisation. Within our social hierarchies, joys make us vulnerable to exploitation, as the more joys we have, the more open to exploitation we can become within groups that glorify exploitation.

Doing what is right may be of little concern to many within such groups, but there will always be a percentage willing to stand for what is right, regardless of the loss of joys they may face. How many of us are willing to sacrifice all of our joys to stand by just one right? If we are being honest with ourselves, very few of us, and arguably rightly so, as our joys, regardless of how basic they may appear, are what give us meaning. All that we do often comes down to meaning. If the meaning we have for doing what is right eclipses the meaning we have for our joys, then the sacrifice of our joys can hold great meaning. Even if we have no joys left, there can be meaning in the sacrifice of future joys.

A question less asked is what is the meaning of rocks? Or the meaning of water, gases, metals or atoms? We often see ourselves as more than these things (or anything else for that matter), so as they have less meaning to us, we perceive them as having less meaning, but where would we be without these things? The truth is, we hold no more meaning in our universe than anything else in it, and any meaning we have is ours and ours alone.

With all that being said, we, our lives, our families, our work and everything in our universe is as meaningless as it is meaningful, and also as meaningful as it is meaningless. If we happen to share some meaning with others, then it can enhance the meaning, if we value others, that is. A behaviour social hierarchies exploit, but as individuals, we can value the meaning of things we share with no one. For example, what sound mind would find any meaning in this book?

As well as being encouraged to adopt meaning from others, we are often conditioned to lose much of our meaning in things that those around us don’t value. If we abandon our own meaning in order to adopt the meaning of those around us, then acceptance becomes our dominant meaning, regardless of the cost. To hold meaning in the things that we know will always endure, but any meaning attached to a belief is on shaky ground, yet as we are all ignorant, we do it anyway (some more than others).

Today’s debt slaves strive to attain or win their manumission to a degree by adopting a lust for another man’s socks, and by falling into their masters’ traps of labouring for them just to return some socks to their owners, many allow much of life to pass them by, as the meaninglessness of superficiality takes priority over anything that is truly meaningful. Then again, we are all capable of having very different definitions of what is truly meaningful.

Meaning, just like everything else that is tainted by our status seekers, doesn’t avoid our serial monopolists attempts to crowbar their own narratives onto any we may hold. Within all of our master/slave cultures, the masters always try to convince their slaves that there is great meaning in obeying their will and valuing their fictions. In our modern cultures of hate, many adopt meaning from their master’s schools, as their populations are sold the idea that there is great meaning to repeating every lie in exchange for a superficial perception of elevated intelligence.

Visit any school as exam results are being passed out, to observe the meaning many hold in a ridiculous form of human grading, that does little more than help the master classes weed out anyone who may possess the ability to recognise and question their lies and actions, to ensure the more aware do not become part of their valued members of society. As our sockmakers education systems are born from our master’s desire to produce obedient slave soldiers, their enforcers are always heralded with great meaning within these cultures of monopolised violence, as it is this group that commits many of the wrongs they need executed to satisfy their greed.

Few may find little meaning in murdering many, just so that a few glorified individuals can live a luxurious lifestyle, but by attaching meaning to a fiction, hierarchies can convince many to find meaning in murdering others for their fiction. Again, “My greed needs you” (to murder and steal) may not inspire as many willing wrongdoers as much as “Your country needs you” (to murder and steal), as the meaning many attach to their master’s fiction of country is a favoured lie, over the true meaning in the acts they are expected to commit for the malice and greed of a few.

Then, of course, there is the great meaning in working, even when the rewards for our labour are very little. As long as we are working to feed the greed of a few, there is for many, meaning attached to the degree of status to be gained within these roles. Anyone who works twice as hard and twice as long as most, but keeps the spoils of their labour to themselves, does not gain the same level of meaning as those content to have their wealth stolen from them. At least according to our glorified wrongdoers and their followers.

We are all capable of adopting meaning from others we share our time with, but the conformity of meaning our cultures practice can be a very dangerous and harmful habit. Whether we allow others to give our life meaning or find our own within our own lives and all around us, our choices always come with consequences. Many within social hierarchies are encouraged to believe they should have a purpose in life or their life should hold some great meaning, and this purpose or meaning is often defined by how their life servers their master’s interests or fulfils their definitions of success. Within all of our cultures of hate, many mothers and fathers hold great meaning in their children murdering each other for a popular lie, oblivious to the needlessness of it all.

The purpose or meaning we may attach to attaining another man’s wealth and status may be incredibly superficial, but this perception is arguably no more or less than any purpose or meaning we attach to anything. We can bow to our masters’ meaning, or understand our social hierarchies enough to recognise the meaninglessness of all the meaning glorified wrongdoers try to sell, but if we allow ourselves to be blinded to all that our hierarchies ignore, devalue or demonise, then we can run the risk of wallowing in their endless cycles of meaninglessness to find meaning in the superficial.

Whether we or others define our life as a purposeless, meaningless life or a purposeful, meaningful one makes no difference to the reality of our existence. The meaninglessness of meaning is exposed over time, as when we fail to pass on meaning, it eventually becomes meaningless. We could argue that the value of any meaning lies within the fraction of time in which any of our meaning exists, so like the fragility of love, its temporary existence holds part of its significance, as well as its insignificance.

We often attach great meaning to our existence (some more than others) despite its temporary nature, and many of us may convince ourselves that we are eternal in some ways, but no matter how many lies our status seekers sell, we are as eternal as an ice cube in the desert. Detaching meaning from ourselves and others can be advantageous in acquiring timeless knowledge, as this can allow us to put more meaning on the eternal over the temporary.

We can, of course, hold great meaning in our lives, work and relationships, but as they are all temporary, we could argue that meaning in all that is eternal is more profound than the temporary, and even though we are all a small part of the eternal, from an individual’s perspective, our temporary existence is our eternity. All that we are and all that we do are mere echoes of all who came before us. No matter the meaning we place on belonging and understanding, inequality of worth and equality of worth, unity and division or right and wrong, we all make a choice on the meaning we hold, regardless of it being influenced by others or of our own making. Even within unconscious, ignorant compliance, we are at some conscious level making a choice, whether we wish to be aware of it or not. Choice may be more abundant to the less oppressed than the oppressed, and what we choose will always be influenced by others to some degree.

We may choose to stand with others, but if we can’t stand alone, we stand for nothing. Many of today’s debt slaves may be conditioned and fooled into perceiving the illusions of endless meaningless choices as a sign of their freedom that masks their servitude to the greed of a few, yet this in itself is a choice of sorts. We are often defined by our choices, and even when we choose to side with right, it is often to our detriment when right is so unpopular. Yet many who refuse to be defined by what passes as fashionably moral to the immoral, choose it anyway.

We live in paradise, yet we choose to reduce it to a hellish wasteland strewn with our corpses and our potential, just to fulfil the fantasies of a few. What we choose today may not be what we choose tomorrow, as a well-worn choice can be discarded for another. Every day brings choices, if not necessarily the awareness of them. The choices of many can influence the choice of one, and the choice of one can influence the choices of many.

How we choose to live in our groups is always a form of collective choice, if not necessarily an individual one, but every group is just a collection of individuals and their choices. Regardless of all the things we have no choice over, choice exists for us all, even for the most enslaved among us.

When we understand why we make the choices we make, they hold a degree of predictability. We have one window of life to make all of our choices within, and will inevitably make good and bad ones, although the meaning of good and bad can always be subjective. Meaning in our choices always exists, should we or others choose it to. No matter if it is valued by billions, or just one.